"The great Father Zed, Archiblogopoios"
-
Fr. John Hunwicke
"Some 2 bit novus ordo cleric"
- Anonymous
"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."
- Kractivism
"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"
"Zuhlsdorf is an eccentric with no real consequences" -
HERE
- Michael Sean Winters
"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."
- Anna Arco
“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”
- Comment
"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."
- Sam Rocha
"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."
- Comment
"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."
- Anonymous
Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD
- Comment
Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.
- America Magazine
RC integralist who prays like an evangelical fundamentalist.
-Austen Ivereigh on
Twitter
[T]he even more mainline Catholic Fr. Z. blog.
-
Deus Ex Machina
“For me the saddest thing about Father Z’s blog is how cruel it is.... It’s astonishing to me that a priest could traffic in such cruelty and hatred.”
- Jesuit homosexualist James Martin to BuzzFeed
"Fr. Z's is one of the more cheerful blogs out there and he is careful about keeping the crazies out of his commboxes"
- Paul in comment at
1 Peter 5
"I am a Roman Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
I am a TLM-going Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
And I am in a state of grace today, in no small part, because of your blog."
- Tom in
comment
"Thank you for the delightful and edifying omnibus that is your blog."-
Reader comment.
"Fr. Z disgraces his priesthood as a grifter, a liar, and a bully. -
- Mark Shea
Loading ...
Just being Jesuitical…arguing from both sides of the issue so you can’t claim he’s not right.
Unfortunately, Fr. Martin is both editor in chief and editor at large of his own Twitter account.
Wait a minute: is he seriously suggesting that an “Editor at large” has “no say” in what gets published?
That could ONLY mean that an editor at large is not an editor. Which is to say (in other terms) that it is NOT an editor. Being an editor at large for him means getting the TITLE of “editor” without any of the content. Good deal, if you can get it.
Yes: being Jesuitical apparently means making up terms to mean whatever you want them to mean, at any given moment, changing without notice.
Has anyone bothered to notice that Martin is really a hum-drum hack? His writing would not be publishable material if it did not consist in reliably toeing the party line on every lib notion that comes down the pike, with a limp spine thrown in. It’s not like he has any access to information that is not readily available to everyone else, and he certainly does not present his ideas in any more elegant or more persuasive form than any other lib who has hung around academic circles for 20 years: yes, he can complete a sentence properly. The lib media celebrates him merely because he reliably backs up their prejudices. Wow, what a resume.
To be fair, I’ve been involved in many meetings at work about topics where I was not a decision maker. I find it hard to believe that someone with the title has _no say_ in what gets published. Maybe he’s not the final word, but I would think at least he’s involved in the discussions (which is what it sounds like).
Surely, that is the way God made him.
Heh.
America magazine editors (collectively) get to vote on pieces getting published or not. I am stupefied editor-at-large James Martin, LGBTSJ, does not know this.