Swiss Bishop forbids the use of churches and chapels to the SSPX

I am saddened by the following story, which I found on Vatican Insider in Italian from Andrea Tornielli:

“Lefevbrites are suspended a divinis, they cannot celebrate in Catholic churches”

His is a striking and suggestive position: the Bishop of Diocese of Lausanne, Geneva and Fribourg, Charles Morerod, Dominican theologian, onetime Rector of the Angelicum and Secretary of the International Theological Commission and member of the delegation from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in dialogues with the Society of St. Pius X – has published a decree forbidding Lefebvrite priests from celebrating Mass in churches and chapels of his diocese. He reaffirmed that priests of the Society are suspended “a divinis”.

The document, signed 20 January, deals with “the admission of other religions, confessions or religious groups, such as indeed the Society of St. Pius X, and of independent theologians in Roman Catholic churches and chapels”.

[…]

He cites the 1993 Decree on Ecumenism.

I am sure the whole thing will be translated soon, but that is the core of it.

I have said often in these electronic pages that, one of these days, the SSPXers are going to wake up and find that they are not considered Catholic by the Catholic Church.  I hope and pray that it will not come to that.  This is an open and suppurating wound in the unity of the Church.  We need what the SSPX can offer.  But they must bend to proper authority.

Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.

Posted in Benedict XVI, Pope of Christian Unity, SSPX, Year of Faith | Tagged , , ,
51 Comments

WDTPRS: Candlemas

Today is the final “peak” arising from the liturgical cycle of Advent/Christmas/Epiphany.  Today, called in the traditional way and according to the older Roman calendar the Feast of the Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Holy Church would cease to sing the Marian antiphon associated with Christmas,

It is forty days since Christmas.

In the physical world, we in the Northern hemisphere are beginning to notice more and more the growing of the light of day.  The seemingly endless darkness of the short days has finally in a noticeable way been attenuated.  I have noticed in the last couple days that the birds have broken their silence and are beginning to sing in a different way, even though winter here as far from over.  Today’s feast is also about light, in the broader symbolic sense.

This feast has its name from the Blessed Virgin, because the Law in Leviticus required her to go to the temple for purification after giving birth.  The Lord did not need to be baptized by John in the river, for He had nothing to repent.  Mary did not need purification, for she was spotless.  But they desired to fulfill the Law.  This feast also reminds us of the beautiful tradition of the “Churching” of women after childbirth, a special blessing given by the Church, which has alas fallen into desuetude.  “Churching” was done in honor also of this moment in the life Christ’s Mother.

This is, however, really a feast in honor of the Lord: He is being offered to the Father in a foreshadowing of His greater Sacrifice for our salvation.  The theme of offering, of sacrifice draws our eyes away from looking back at Christmas and Epiphany forward to the Passion and Easter.

You remember the story from the Gospel, in Luke 2.  Mary and Joseph come to the temple in Jerusalem to fulfill the Law.  Firstborn males had to be dedicated to the Lord. The old woman Anna and the old man Simeon had the special grace from the Lord to have their dearest desires fulfilled before they died: to see the Messiah. It is in this moment that Simeon makes the prophecy about the sacrificial sufferings Mary will endure and he speaks his great Nunc dimittis, which Holy Church sings in the darkness at the end of the day for Compline.

In the traditional Roman liturgy today in larger churches there would be a special blessing of candles and a procession before Mass would begin.  The chants sung for the rite contain many references to light.  Also, a lighted candle is to be held during the reading of the Gospel and during the Roman Canon.  The candle brings to mind also our baptism.

In a way, the faithful really ought to have candles at all Masses.  But now, in High Masses, the “touchbearers” fulfill this role for the congregation.  Remember that the next time you see the candles come in: that’s you up there.

Remember: Holy Church gives us candles so that we will use them When I baptize, I suggest to people that they save the candle, with a label indiciting what it is and who was there, the name of the priest, etc.  Perhaps then they could save that candle against the day when, perhaps, it might be used as one of the candles on the altar for their wedding, or with a home Communion set, for when they need Last Rites.  The candle you receive on other days of the year, the Vigil of Easter for example, or for Eucharist processions, could be burned in times of trial or danger, as when storms are coming or there is social upheaval.  These candles remind us that we too out to be filled with light for others, in their darkness and difficulties, to see and be guided by.

Candles are beautiful symbols of our sacrifices.  They are like living things.  They eat and drink the wax from the bees, made collectively in association with sweetness.  They breath air.  They move in their flames as they flicker.  They communicate to our eyes a beautiful light and give contrast to their surroundings by illumination.  They burn out at the end of their span.  So do we.  They are consumed for the Lord in the liturgy.  So should we be.  We do all these things.   And so, using candles in important times is a very wholesome and Catholic practice.  Leaving one of these little candles in a Church, as a symbolic sacrifice of your prayers and petitions is entirely natural.

For Holy Mass on Candlemas we hear some splendid prayers.  Let’s look at a couple.

Here is the third of several prayers recited by the priest for the blessing of the candles.  In older days, the priest would be wearing a purple cope and would switch to white for Mass.  By the time of the 1962 Missale Romanum all the rites are in white.

Domine Iesu Christe, lux vera, quae illuminas omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum: effunde bene+dictionem tuam super hos cereos, et sancti+fica eos lumine gratiae tuae, et concede propitius; ut, sicut haec luminaria igne visibili accensa nocturnas depellunt tenebras; ita corda nostra invisibili igne, id est, Sancti Spiritus splendore illustrata, omnium vitiorum caecitate careant: ut, purgato mentis oculo, ea cernere possimus, quae tibi sunt placita, et nostrae saluti utilia; quatenus, post huius saeculi caliginosa discrimina, ad lucem indeficientem pervenire mereamur. Per te, Christe Iesu, Salvator mundi, qui in Trinitate perfecta vivis et regnas in saecula saeculorum.
R. Amen.

Daily Missal and Liturgical Manual (Baronius Press):

O Lord Jesus Christ, the true Light who enlightenest every man that cometh into this world: pour forth Thy blessing + upon these candles, and sanctify + them with the light of Thy grace, and mercifully grant, that as these lights enkindled with visible fire dispel the darkness of night, so our hearts illumined by invisible fire, that is, by the splendor of the Holy Spirit, may be free from the blindness of all vice, that the eye of our mind being cleansed, we may be able to discern what is pleasing to Thee and profitable to our salvation; so that after the perilous darkness of this life we may deserve to attain to neverfailing light: through Thee, O Christ Jesus, Savior of the world, who in the perfect Trinity, livest and reignest, God, world without end.

There is an adage that sin makes you stupid. Note the connection between vice and blindness and darkness.  The visible fire is not just a symbol of the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.  It also signifies life properly lived, a fact seen by others.

At the beginning of the procession an wonderful antiphon is sung.  Remember the Gospel.  Mary would have been brought within, carrying the Lord, the Light of the World, and led to a place of sacrifice, the offering of her Firstborn.  In the Churching of woman after child birth, they are met a the entrance to the church and then led forward.

Adorna thalamum tuum, Sion, et suscipe Regem Christum amplectere Mariam, quae est coelestis porta: ipsa enim portat Regem gloriae novi luminis: subsistit Virgo, ad ducens manibus Filium ante luciferum genitum: quem accipiens Simeon in ulnas suas, praedicavit populis, Dominum eum esse vitae et mortis, et Salvatorem mundi.

Adorn thy bridal-chamber, O Sion, and welcome Christ the King: with loving embrace greet Mary who is the very gate of heaven; for she bringeth to thee the glorious King of the new light: remaining ever a Virgin yet she bearest in her arms the Son begotten before the day-star: even the Child, whom Simeon taking into his arms, declared to the peoples to be the Lord of life and death, and the Savior of the world.

At Christmas we receive the Lord.  At Candlemas we offer Him.

In addition to the theme of light functioning throughout the rite there is also another echo of Christmas and Epiphany.  God meets man.  God comes to us, and we go to Him.  Today there is another meeting of God and man, expectant man, symbolized by Anna and Simeon.  The hymn sung in the procession frames our meeting, our Encounter as the liturgy of the Greek East calls this say, in nuptial terms.

In the Mass itself, we have the

COLLECT (1962MR):
Omnipotens sempiterne Deus,
maiestatem tuam suppliciter exoramus:
ut, sicut unigenitus Filius tuus hodierna die
cvm nostrae carnis substantia in templo est praesentatus;
ita nos facias purificatis tibi mentibus praesentari
.

This is an ancient prayer, going back at least to the 9th c. and is found Liber sacramentorum Romanae ecclesiae ordine excarpsus.

You will see what is happening quickly, if you are a student of Latin, by taking careful note of the ut in the second part, which leads to a subjunctive down the line.  Also, there is a typical sicut…ita constuction, the ita part having the subjunctive result of the ut.  There is a nice turn of phrase at the end, using a trop hyperbaton, whereby that tibi separates the two elements of the ablative absolute purificatis … mentibus.  I also like that use of praesentatuspraesentari, a trope called, if memory serves, polyptoton.

The word maiestas is associated with gloria, a divine characteristic which transforms us who encounter it.  Thinks of the transformation of Moses’ face after he met with the Lord in the tent or on the mount: he had to wear a veil because his face was too bright to look at.  Also, Romans liked addressing people in indirect ways.  We still do this in some formal discourse and letters.  It is courtly, courteous.  Here maiestas can be heard as a form of address: Your Majesty.  So, maiestas has layers on layers of meaning.

Note the philosophical language of substantia.  Some times people will argue that the switch from Greek to Latin, the spoken language in ancient Rome, is justification for using the “vernacular” today.  The problem with that argument is that the Latin used in the Church for prayer, was not the language spoken by the people. It had technical vocabuary (e.g., maiestas, substantia) and turns of phrase nothing like everyday speech (e.g., hyberbaton, polyptoton).

See what happens?  It all seems straight forward.  Then you start to drill.

Candlemas is a beautiful feast full of meaning and symbols.

Holy Church puts candles in your hands today, to remind you of your gifts and your duties.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Patristiblogging, WDTPRS | Tagged , ,
18 Comments

Knights of Divine Mercy

I am in Pine Bluff, WI, in the Diocese of Madison, to help on the First Friday, with an outstanding men’s group started by the parish priest, Fr Heilman.

For the Knights of Divine Mercy tonight we began with Holy Mass in the Extraordinary Form, Exposition, and then a period for confessions. The chaplet of Divine Mercy was recited, the Blessed Sacrament temporarily veiled, and now the local bishop, Most Rev. Robert Morlino, is speaking.

20130201-192904.jpg

His Excellency had touched on how the Church has become feminized, and how important it is for men to be men. He has touched on the damage rejection of Humanae vitae did, along with no-fault divorce, to marriage. “We have to stay focused on accountability for our commitments, even before the state.” “There are demands built into human nature.”

Once the way is opened by totally contraceptive, sterile, marriage, then the way is opened to calling anything you want marriage.

He is moving on to orientation and “gender identity”.

He is hitting one after another out of the park!

Posted in Brick by Brick, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, What Fr. Z is up to, Year of Faith |
15 Comments

Card. Mahony’s next move? Deflect responsibility to Archbp. Gomez.

Read what I wrote HERE about Los Angeles’s Archbishop Gomez bumping Card. Mahony off the diocesean schedule because of Mahony’s cover-up of abuse of children.

Now Card. Mahony writes on his blog… and it sincerely grieves me to point this out… writes on his blog a statement to Archbp. Gomez:

When you [Archbp. Gomez] were formally received as our Archbishop on May 26, 2010, you began to become aware of all that had been done here over the years for the protection of children and youth. You became our official Archbishop on March 1, 2011 and you were personally involved with the Compliance Audit of 2012—again, in which we were deemed to be in full compliance.

Not once over these past years did you ever raise any questions about our policies, practices, or procedures in dealing with the problem of clergy sexual misconduct involving minors.

I have stated time and time again that I made mistakes, especially in the mid-1980s. I apologized for those mistakes, and committed myself to make certain that the Archdiocese was safe for everyone.

[…]

HUH?!?

So… he is deflecting his responsibility to Archbp. Gomez.

I hope Archbp. Gomez does not respond.  Let the papal nuncio and the Holy Father deal with this one.

In the meantime, will the National Schismatic Reporter call on Card. Mahony to do a Card. Billot? Resign from the College of Cardinals?  The NSR’s (aka Fishwrap) editors and writers have danced a circle around Bp. Finn with torches and inflated pig’s bladders hooting for him to resign as bishop of Kansas City – St. Joseph.  What will the paper of record for heretics and schismatics do now?

Posted in Clerical Sexual Abuse, Linking Back | Tagged , , ,
113 Comments

More about Obamatax – Will families be ready to pay $20k per year?

More about

From CNSNews:

(CNSNews.com) – In a final regulation issued Wednesday, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) assumed that under Obamacare the cheapest health insurance plan available in 2016 for a family will cost $20,000 for the year.

Under Obamacare, Americans will be required to buy health insurance or pay a penalty to the IRS.

The IRS’s assumption that the cheapest plan for a family will cost $20,000 per year is found in examples the IRS gives to help people understand how to calculate the penalty they will need to pay the government if they do not buy a mandated health plan.

The examples point to families of four and families of five, both of which the IRS expects in its assumptions to pay a minimum of $20,000 per year for a bronze plan.

“The annual national average bronze plan premium for a family of 5 (2 adults, 3 children) is $20,000,” the regulation says.

Bronze will be the lowest tier health-insurance plan available under Obamacare–after Silver, Gold, and Platinum. Under the law, the penalty for not buying health insurance is supposed to be capped at either the annual average Bronze premium, 2.5 percent of taxable income, or $2,085.00 per family in 2016.

In the new final rules published Wednesday, IRS set in law the rules for implementing the penalty Americans must pay if they fail to obey Obamacare’s mandate to buy insurance.

[…]

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Liberals, Religious Liberty, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
30 Comments

White House “takes out the trash” in its fake HHS Mandate tweaks

On the TV series The West Wing you learn about “taking out the trash”.  That is, the White House releases what might be potentially problematic news on a Friday, so that things can calm down over the weekend and other stories can drive the bad item out of the news cycle.  So, today the Obama Administration released “tweaks” to the anti-Catholic, anti-1st Amendment HHS Mandate.  It’s Friday and Hilary Clinton is stepping down as Secretary of State, there was a terrorist attack in Turkey, etc.  Get it?

So, what do the new HHS Mandate tweaks do, if anything?  First, it seems they do nothing, for this could be just a proposal of new rules.

Moreover, there are 80 pages… 80 pages… of regulations.  The Obama Administration still claims the right to determine which institutions are to be granted religious freedom.

It still does not exempt Catholic charities and Catholic universities.  It does not exempt Catholics who own businesses.

At EWTN we find this statement (in part):

We have analyzed today’s notice with our legal team from the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and the initial conclusions are not promising. First, this is simply a notice of a proposed rule; it is not an actual rule that changes anything. Second, while the proposed rules might expand the mandate’s religious exemption for some organizations affiliated directly with the Church, it does not appear that EWTN will qualify for this exemption. Third, the proposed rules have not dealt with the concerns of self-insured health plans like EWTN’s. Today’s notice from the government simply kicks this can further down the road.

Sadly, throughout this proposed rule, the government continues to make the erroneous assertion that contraception, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs are health care. They are not.

Apart from our interest in things Catholic, companies such as Hobby Lobby, Christian-owned, are still going to be fined into bankruptcy.  HERE.

Reminder: a pro-abortion catholic runs the HHS Department: Kathleen Sebelius.

[wp_youtube]HenyeGwyLmU[/wp_youtube]

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Liberals, Religious Liberty, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,
22 Comments

Waiting for the hat to drop: Card. Mahony relieved of duties in Los Angeles.

The Archbishop of Los Angeles, Most Rev. José H. Gomez, has said “Effective immediately, I have informed Cardinal Mahony that he will no longer have any administrative or public duties.”  See the pdf of the letter HERE.

What this means is that His Eminence cannot be any sort of representative for the sitting Archbishop or for the Archdiocese.  Canon law itself gives Cardinal some faculties.  According to can. 357§2, “in those matters which pertain to their own person, cardinals living outside of Rome and outside their own diocese are exempt from the power of governance of the bishop of the diocese in which they are residing.”  So, there is little that Archbp. Gomez can do, except cancel every public event in which Card. Mahony was going to play a principle part, such as confirmations.

We shall see what the happens next.  It could be that this will roil and bubble for a couple weeks and then settle down.  People have been thinking about Card. Mahony for a long time. So, this is not staggering news. Also, L.A. is not Boston. Card. Mahony lobbied for immigrants and migrant workers, therefore he will get a partial pass from the press and from catholic liberals such those at the National Schismatic Reporter (aka Fishwrap).

Will Mahony get a pass from Fishwrap?  There is an editorial over there but it reads as if it were written and released before the news about Archbp. Gomez’s letter.  Predictably, the editors of the National Schismatic Reporter take advantage of this dreadful news to bash the Holy See and Bp. Finn.  The dopiest line in their piece must be this: “The most egregious and glaring example of a lack of accountability among the hierarchy is Bishop Robert Finn of Kansas City-St. Joseph, Mo.”  Say what?  The “most egregious” example is Bp. Finn and not Card. Mahony?   Is this L.A. or LaLa Land?

The National Schismatic Reporter, ladies and gents!

Given what has happened, I cannot see an alternative to Pope Benedict XVI removing Card. Mahony from the College of Cardinals.

Posted in Clerical Sexual Abuse, Liberals, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , ,
135 Comments

A note on registration (which has been switched off)

I have been under siege by vile spammers who deserve to roast in the deep cinders of hell, as Dr. Maturin would put it.

As a result, I switched off registration for the blog in the hope of thwarting the reprehensible plots of these nefarious ne’erdowells.

I will, however, switch registration on now for a while.

If you have been trying to register, register.  I will turn it off again later on.

UPDATE 1 Feb 15:21 GMT:

I have switched it off again for a while.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, O'Brian Tags |
19 Comments

QUAERITUR: Blessing chickens

From a reader:

I’m planning on hatching chickens in the next couple of weeks. I’m using shipped eggs which have a higher mortality rate from being through the mail system. (but I simply can’t get what I want locally) Is there a blessing for hatching eggs? These poor little chooks are going to need every advantage they can get.

It is good that you made the distinction about “hatching”.  More on that below.

There is in the old Rituale Romanum the Benedictio volucrum, a Blessing of Fowl.

After the usual introduction, the priest continues with Old Testament images so common to blessings,  as in (not my translation) …

Among the many created species which thy bounty prompted to bestow for man’s use, thou didst also bring forth winged creatures from the waters.  With these, Noe, in coming form from the ark, rendered thee a pleasing burnt offering.  And in Israel’s deliverance from Egypt, thou didst order through Moses, thy servant, that the people should ear the birds of the air, separating the clean from the unclean…

The older Rituale Romanum and its abbreviated Collectio Rituum has many blessings for things of daily life.  We should reintegrate the use of these blessings and sacramentals into our lives.  They help to keep our hearts focus on God and on goodness, truth and beauty, and many of them are meant to put to flight the enemy of the soul.

Get the priest to bless the eggs using that blessing.  He’ll need holy water, too.

And, as I have said before, I don’t think the newer “Book of Blessings” (De Benedictionibus) is worth the paper it is printed on.

As to the “hatching” distinction, there is in the older Rituale a Benedictio ovorum, a Blessing of eggs, which we would commonly do at Easter time.  This blessing is intended for eggs we are going to eat.  For the hatching eggs, I would go with the Blessing for Fowl.

In the meantime, does anyone else think chickens are funny?

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , ,
43 Comments

Women Priests? No. An explanation.

CNS has posted a video of an interview with the Theologian of the Papal Household, Fr. Wojciech Giertych, OP. He talks about male only priesthood.

[wp_youtube]GfGJs-iFtS8[/wp_youtube]

Posted in Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, The Drill | Tagged ,
41 Comments