Vatican talks with LCWR leadership – ‘open and cordial’

From CNA:

Farrell & Mock in the park lot outside the Palazzo del Sant'Uffizio

Vatican City, Jun 12, 2012 / 11:11 am (CNA/EWTN News).- The Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has described talks with the Leadership Conference of Women Religious [a subsidiary of the Magisterium of Nuns.] as open and cordial.

“The meeting provided the opportunity for the Congregation and the LCWR officers to discuss the issues and concerns raised by the doctrinal assessment in an atmosphere of openness and cordiality,” said a statement issued by the Vatican press office June 12.

In April 2012 the Vatican called for a reform of the body after a four-year audit or “doctrinal assessment,” which concluded there was a “crisis” of belief throughout its ranks.

On June 12, Franciscan Sister Pat Farrell and St. Joseph Sister Janet Mock, who are respectively the president and executive director of the conference, went to the offices of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome and met with officials there for approximately 90 minutes.

They discussed matters with Cardinal William J. Levada, the congregation’s prefect, and Archbishop Peter J. Sartain of Seattle. He has been charged by the Vatican with leading the renewal of the LCWR.

“We are grateful for the opportunity for open dialogue and now we will return to our members to see about next steps, and that is all we have to say,” Sr. Farrell told CNA upon leaving the meeting.  [Remember?  I said HERE they would talk to the press as soon as they walked out the door.] They said they will now take the matter to their annual assembly in St. Louis this coming August. [Interesting speakers at that conference, too.  I am waiting for my invitation.]

Earlier this month the group. Whose leaders represent approximately 80 percent of women religious in the U.S., [From what I understand the LCWR actually is comprised of the leadership of different communities of sisters.  It does NOT therefore represent all the sisters who might belong to those groups.  Therefore, it seems to be a misrepresentation to say they “represent … 80 %”.   Take a look at THIS.] described the Vatican’s doctrinal assessment as “based on unsubstantiated accusations” and “a flawed process that lacked transparency.”

In their statement today the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith reminded journalists that the religious conference “is constituted by and remains under the supreme direction of the Holy See” according to canon law.

They also explained that the purpose of the doctrinal assessment had been to “assist the LCWR in this important mission by promoting a vision of ecclesial communion founded on faith in Jesus Christ” and also on “the teachings of the Church as faithfully taught through the ages under the guidance of the Magisterium.”

The assessment had found serious theological and doctrinal errors in presentations at the LCWR’s annual assemblies in recent years, with many showing “scant regard for the role of the Magisterium.”

Concern has also been expressed at the conference’s choice of new-age author Barbara Marx Hubbard as the keynote speaker for the annual assembly this August. A non-Catholic, Hubbard advocates a worldview entitled “conscious evolution.” [She is not the only troubling speaker.]

Her talk to the assembly is billed as helping religious communities become “open to the new levels of consciousness, even as that revelation exceeds the boundaries of present day understanding of one’s faith.”  [Do you suppose she helped Pres. Obama evolve into the First Gay President?]

 

Posted in Linking Back, Magisterium of Nuns |
14 Comments

Not Just Too Cool but Super Too Cool

I will do more about this later, since I am in a moving bus, but this news got me worked up.

Some has discovered 29 unknown sermons of the 3rd century Alexandrian theologian Origen.

The intrepid Tornielli in Vatican Insider writes (sorry… translation must wait):

[…]

È una clamorosa scoperta quella effettuata nella Bayerische Staatsbibliothek di Monaco di Baviera, dove sono state da poco ritrovate 29 omelie inedite di Origene di Alessandria, scrittore e teologo cristiano vissuto tra secondo e terzo secolo.

L’Osservatore Romano, nell’edizione di domani, definisce «la scoperta del secolo» quella di una filologa italiana nella biblioteca di Monaco di Baviera, annunciata ieri dalla stessa Bayerische Staatsbibliothek. Nel pomeriggio dello scorso 5 aprile, Giovedì santo, studiando un codice bizantino dell’XI secolo, il Monacense greco 314, Marina Molin Pradel si è infatti accorta che alcune omelie sui Salmi in esso contenute corrispondevano a quelle di Origene tradotte in latino da Rufino all’inizio del V secolo. E subito dopo Pasqua, estendendo i controlli sul manoscritto, la studiosa è arrivata alla conclusione che tutte le 29 omelie contenute nel codice, finora inedite, sono del grande intellettuale cristiano.

«Nella prima metà del terzo secolo – scrive il quotidiano della Santa Sede – Origene aveva dettato sul Salterio una serie imponente di opere che hanno presto avuto un influsso decisivo sull’esegesi biblica sia greca sia latina. Ma proprio la loro estensione, oltre alla condanna del 553, ne spiega la quasi totale perdita, già in epoca antica».

[…]

Can you imagine finding something like that?

There are treasures yet to discover!

Posted in Just Too Cool, Patristiblogging | Tagged
26 Comments

Fishwrap on the heaving thronging pro-LCWR rally!

Jamie Manson, whose mentor … mentrix?… when obtaining the coveted MDiv at Yale was RSM Sr. Margaret Falrey, the highly-noted author about “self pleasuring”, is aflutter in the Fishwrap that tens of people showed up in NEW YORK CITY for a demonstration for the poor oppressed nuns, so oppressed and besmirched by their male Roman oppressors.

Jamie is scheduled at the LCWR meeting in August. I suppose they need to keep the group going at least until they can give all their talks and get paid.

I still haven’t received my invitation, by the way. Dum spiro spero.

Anyway the group called Nun Justice – yes I am sure you know them – held a Big Apple Bash … (sorry, that was a lame attempt to sound like a different blog) … New York City rally and tens of people showed up! Can you imagine the excitement? 150 people rallying!

The outpouring of support for the sisters has been truly impressive. I believe some of them even had signs!

Thanks to the ministry of the Fishwrap and Nun Justice, the oppressing masculine resolve of the oppressive male oppressors of the CDF and USCCB will soon crumble. It wont be long now but the teaming crowds of activists will all obtain from the men of the hierarchy that approval they so … deeply … crave.

Posted in Lighter fare, Magisterium of Nuns | Tagged , , , ,
12 Comments

Pres. Obama’s commitment to abortion results in open hypocrisy

Even as The First Gay President seeks through mandates imposed by the unelected minions of his administration to repress the consciences of Catholics and others, in defending an abortion issue he uses the conscience card.

From LifeNews:

[…]

In 2010, they pressed ObamaCare—a top-down, healthcare system takeover—on the American people, and earlier this year, they followed with their abortion pill mandate: a conscience-trampling decree forcing all employers to pay for insurance to cover abortion pills for employees who want them.

Then, on May 31, with the possibility of the passage of legislation in the House of Representatives that would have banned gender selection as a determining factor in abortions, the White House opposed the bill on grounds that it would have “intruded in medical decisions or private family matters.”

In other words, the Obama administration was arguing that the bill would allegedly intrude into decisions best left to individuals. Or, dare I say, it would intrude upon matters of conscience?

[…]

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty | Tagged
3 Comments

What are YOU doing to defend your religious liberty? No. Really. What?

The First Gay President, Pres. Obama, and his administration have been eroding our first liberties.  He is attacking the First Amendment, this time through the Dept of Health and Human Services (HHS).  The most aggressive pro-abortion president in history is bent on forcing us to pay for things that are morally objectionable not only on religious grounds, but also according to natural law.  We must resist these attempts to diminish our first freedoms.  We will not and we cannot comply with Pres. Obama’s attacks on the religious freedom of all Catholic institutions.

From CNA:

Archbishop Lori highlights role of laity in Fortnight for Freedom
By Michelle Bauman

Washington D.C., Jun 12, 2012 / 02:19 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Archbishop William E. Lori of Baltimore stressed the importance of laity involvement in efforts to defend religious freedom from the ongoing threats in the U.S.

“It’s important, of course, for bishops to be teachers and leaders.” But “it is crucial for lay men and women, mothers and fathers of families, lay leaders in all walks of life to advocate for freedom and justice in our society,” Archbishop Lori told CNA on June 9.

Without those voices and without the involvement of the laity, we just won’t get very far,” he added.

“In the Church’s understanding,” he explained, “it is the laity who are the ones that bring about the just and tranquil society. It is the laity who are the forefront of creating what Pope Paul VI called the ‘civilization of love.’”

Archbishop Lori, who leads the U.S. bishops’ religious freedom committee, encouraged the laity to get involved in the June 21 to July 4 “Fortnight for Freedom” event through education, prayer and advocacy.

[…]

Read the rest there.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Emanations from Penumbras, New Evangelization, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , ,
29 Comments

COMMUNIQUE CONCERNING DOCTRINAL ASSESSMENT OF LCWR (i.e., the meeting they had)

From VIS:

COMMUNIQUE CONCERNING DOCTRINAL ASSESSMENT OF LCWR
Vatican City, 12 June 2012 (VIS) – Given below is the text of an English-language statement released by the director of the Holy See Press Office concerning a meeting held at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith about the doctrinal Assessment of the LCWR.

“Today the superiors of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith met with the president and executive director of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) in the United States of America. Archbishop Peter J. Sartain of Seattle, the Holy See’s delegate for the doctrinal assessment of the LCWR, also participated in the meeting.

“The meeting provided the opportunity for the Congregation and the LCWR officers to discuss the issues and concerns raised by the doctrinal assessment in an atmosphere of openness and cordiality.

According to Canon Law, a conference of major superiors such as the LCWR is constituted by and remains under the supreme direction of the Holy See in order to promote common efforts among the individual member institutes and cooperation with the Holy See and the local conference of bishops (cf. Code of Canon Law, canons 708-709). The purpose of the doctrinal assessment is to assist the LCWR in this important mission by promoting a vision of ecclesial communion founded on faith in Jesus Christ and the teachings of the Church as faithfully taught through the ages under the guidance of the Magisterium.

Get that?

The Magisterium.

Not the Magisterium of Nuns or any other pretended teaching authority.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Magisterium of Nuns, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged , ,
13 Comments

BLOOD! BLOOD! MORE BLOOD!

Please use the sharing buttons!  Thanks!

QUAERUNTUR:

What’s your blood type?  Have you, because of some problem, ever needed blood?  Have you ever given blood?

I understand that Thursday is World Blood Donor Day.

I have a pretty rare blood-type. As an A- (about 3.5% of the population) I can receive blood only from A+, A-, AB+, and AB- while I can give only to A- and O-.

AB+ can receive from anyone but give only to AB+, while O- can give to anyone and receive only from O-.

It has been a while since I have given blood. When I was a college student I sold blood pretty regularly. For a few years then I regularly gave blood. When I moved overseas I got out of the practice. It’s time to start doing this again.

Sometimes I write about disaster preparedness. We have a social responsibility, it seems to me, to help in a broader effort. Bad things happen to people and a good blood supply could save lives.

Just for the heck of it, lets have a poll or two.

My blood type is...

View Results

Also, try this one. Choose your best answer and add comments below.

Giving blood

View Results

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Global Killer Asteroid Questions, POLLS, TEOTWAWKI | Tagged , , , ,
68 Comments

The CDF wanted to hurt Margaret Farley, not help her sales. Right?

Some Fishwrap types have chortled that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith aided sales of Sr. Margaret Farley’s dread and perverse book.   Why, they burble, would the bad men at the CDF do something so stupid as to condemn Farley’s books?  If those bad men reeeeeeally want to hurrrrrrrt Farley, they would have ignored her book!  Leave aside that the CDF has no desire to hurt Farley.  They are trying to defend the Faith and help people, including Farley, avoid going to hell.

That is the way Fishwrap types view fidelity to the doctrine of our Catholic faith.

At the site of the Cardinal Newman Society, there is a good response to the idiots who weigh Farley’s spot on the amazon.com list against the CDF’s actual role.

Here is part:

[…]

So why would the CDF condemn Just Love: A Framework for Christian Sexual Ethics by Sr. Margaret Farley? Especially since the author herself wrote on Yale’s website “that the book was not intended to be an expression of current official Catholic teaching, nor was it aimed specifically against this teaching.  It is of a different genre altogether.”

Well, somebody forgot to tell that to many Catholic theologians, because they’ve used the book in classrooms in Catholic colleges all across the country and as support for their own writings, sometimes challenging the teachings of the Catholic Church.

While Just Love has been largely ignored by the public, it seems to be quite popular in the world of Catholic higher education. [Get that?]

Perhaps most offensively, Fordham University theology and religious education professor Kieran Scott lists Farley’s book as one basis for his argument to “reassess cohabitation as a viable moral option” outside of marriage in Human Sexuality in the Catholic Tradition (2007), which Scott co-edited with Fordham religious education professor Harold Horell.

Sister Farley’s Just Love was a required text in Fairfield University’s 2010 religious studies course, “Sexuality and Spirituality in American College Life.”  Really, doesn’t that say everything about the contemporary Jesuit university?

The prior year, Fairfield lauded Sister Farley’s “keen intellect and prophetic voice” in a statement praising Farley as well as her book, “in which the notion of justice serves as a key to understanding, and re-thinking, human sexuality and the Christian moral tradition.” Farley was there to deliver the University’s Anne Drummey O’Callaghan Lecture on Women in the Church.

At Loyola University Chicago, the spring 2012 seminar for first-year doctoral students in ethics and theology, taught by Sandra Sullivan-Dunbar, required students to read Just Love. The spring 2010 “Christian Ethics” course at Seattle University, taught by Susan Secker, also required Sister Farley’s book. And Loyola Marymount University in 2009 listed Just Love under “required texts” for its “Issues in Moral Theology Today” course taught by Jonathan Rothchild.

Secker seems particularly enamored of Sister Farley, as she noted in her course description:

Sister Farley is an eminently respected Catholic ethicist who has written this volume as a pastoral response to issues of sexual ethics shaped by her years of teaching and ministering at Yale University. Make sure you read her preface and introduction. Of particular importance is her attentiveness to gender, culture, race and religious pluralism in her construction of a framework for sexual ethics. [And don’t miss her descriptions of “self-pleasuring”.]

Just Love was a “suggested” text for the “Christian Sexuality” course at Seattle University in 2011, taught by Fran Ferder and John Heagle. Boston College offered a spring 2010 seminar class on “Contemporary Theories of Justice” by Fr. David Hollenbach S.J., who listed Farley’s book in a supplemental reading list for students. In 2005 Fr. James T. Bretzke, S.J., then of the University of San Francisco, included Farley’s book in his Sexual Ethics Bibliography under “Miscellaneous Sexual Ethics.” Father Bretzke is now a moral theologian at Boston College.

Sister Farley noted her own book in a speech she delivered at the Conference for Mercy Higher Education at Gwynedd-Mercy College, a Catholic college in Pennsylvania, in 2006.

This is far from an exhaustive list. There are likely many other instances of Farley’s book being used in classrooms of Catholic colleges or listed in footnotes of several theological articles or books. Far from being in “a different genre altogether,” as Farley has claimed, her book was being used in theology classrooms and was the basis for many articles being read by college students now and over the past decade.

And it is that serious concern, not how high the book ranks on Amazon, that should matter most to the Vatican – and undoubtedly it does.

[…]

There it is.

The book contains many things that are contrary to the Catholic faith and advance things that are spiritual dangerous.

THAT is why the CDF issued the Notification.

 

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Magisterium of Nuns | Tagged ,
20 Comments

QUAERITUR: Tattoos

From a reader:

Dear Father – can you please advise if it is ok to have a tattoo. My
son who is 18 would like to have a tattoo in latin, via, veritas et
vita. I have searched the web, it does not look like the church
prohibits it.

Is it okay?  It is prohibited?

I don’t know and I don’t think so.

Holy Church doesn’t prohibit getting a tattoo.  But tattoos are subject to cultural taboos and customs.

However, if your son is living under your roof, you could lay down a house rule that people who get tattoos can’t live there.

I suspect no one here will have an opinion about tattoos.  Nope.  No chance.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
122 Comments

Obama’s judicial appointment who helped craft Roe v. Wade

From LifeNews:

The Senate will vote on Monday on Andrew Hurwitz, President Obama’s pro-abortion nominee to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Obama added to his pro-abortion record by placing yet another abortion activist in nomination to a top federal appeals court — this time a lawyer credited with helping craft the Roe v. Wade decision. He appointed Hurwitz to the 9th Circuit Court, the most liberal appeals court in the country based in San Francisco and covering laws approved in western states.

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 13-5 in March to approve Hurwitz as a candidate for a vacancy on the appeals court. Now his nomination heads to the full Senate, which will decide whether to invoke cloture on the nomination.

Hurwitz was instrumental to providing some of the legal framework for Roe, which resulted in 54 million abortions. In a law review paper published in 2002, Hurwitz takes partial credit for drafting opinions as a law clerk that the Supreme Court would later use to frame its landmark decision in Roe v. Wade.

[…]

Call your Senators office and tell him what you think about approving this appointment.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes | Tagged , ,
8 Comments