Fishwrap’s good lesson in liberal tactics

As you watch the coverage of various dust-ups in the Church watch for a particular tactic used by the liberal left.

A great example comes to us today from the site of the National catholic Fishwrap about dissident priests in Ireland.

Get this:

DUBLIN, IRELAND — Just weeks after a report from a Vatican inquiry into the Irish church lamented what it described as “fairly widespread” dissent from church teaching, it was revealed that the Vatican has “silenced” Redemptorist Fr. Tony Flannery.

The Holy See’s move provoked fury among the members of the 800-strong Association of Catholic Priests, [… THERE’s something to lose sleep about…] which has accused the Vatican of issuing a fatwa against liberal clerics.

[NB] It’s not exactly clear why Flannery, a popular author and retreat director, has come under Vatican suspicion. He has voiced support in the past for opening up debates around the ordination of women, a change to the church’s ban on artificial birth control and an end to mandatory celibacy.

[…]

Gee, I dunno!  Why do you suppose such a wonderful priest would attract the eye of the CDF?

You have seen this same tactic from the supporters of the LCWR.  “We were so surprised! We have no idea why Rome is doing this to us! What could they mean by all this?”

At least now the LCWR isn’t alone in being persecuted.  This Irish Ass. of Catholic Priests is under siege as well.

 

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Blatteroons, Dogs and Fleas, Magisterium of Nuns, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, The Drill, The future and our choices, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , ,
23 Comments

UPDATE on the tumult in Platteville. Bp. Morlino sends a letter to the community.

A little while I posted an update about a group of liberals in Platteville, WI (D. Madison) who, rebelling against their priests, worked to undermine the finances of the parish and school. The fruit of their labors has now come to light. It is necessary to close the parish school.

This sad situation has something important to say to people in other places where there may be tensions between priests, bishops, laity.

The Diocese of Madison has a posted on their website a letter from His Excellency Most Rev. Robert C. Morlino.  PDF HERE.  You will find a 3 page letter with Bp. Morlino’s explanation of the situation, his decisions, and his pastoral reflection, and then 2 pages of citations from documents of the Church, including Lumen gentium of Vatican II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, and the Code of Canon Law.

A point that comes through in Bp. Morlino’s letter (we are seeing his response and not the correspondence -and gossip, apparently – that he has received) is that those who are fighting against their priests are making a hell of a tumult.

In Bp. Morlino’s letter there is the suggestion that if the tumult continues there could be “issuance of Canonical warnings“.  He repeats the possibility later in the phrase “… formal warning and action“.

When, in this ever-so-pastoral day and age, you see that sort of language coming from a bishop in a public letter, you know that someone is in spiritual danger.

Aside from that, in this day when both the substitution of feelings for reason and the solipsistic exaltation of poorly understood “rights” cause pastors of souls no small difficulties, Bp. Morlino gets to the nub of a problem:

Excerpt:

Your feelings do matter to me, and I do not take them lightly. However, our end goal should not be simply to restore good feelings. No, there is something greater than good feelings at stake, as good feelings come and go. Much deeper than feelings, what these priests have been sent to offer, is Jesus Christ, He who suffered with and like you, who died for you, and who has been raised to new life, so that you might have lasting joy, lasting hope, and lasting peace – eternal life. The reality of following Jesus is not at every moment full of good feelings; neither Jesus Himself, in His human nature, nor Mary, nor the Apostles were even granted that gift of freedom from painful emotions. By allowing ourselves, with openness, to enter into the mystery of His Church and His Sacraments we find that deep inner joy which passing emotions can’t eradicate.

And then:

There can be no “firing” of priests by the parish community in the Diocese of Madison.  Thus, the priests of the Society of Jesus Christ the Priest will remain in priestly ministry at St. Mary and St. Augustine Parishes in Platteville, and they stand ready to serve you and to seek stability, understanding, and healing. I beg you to seek the same so that the light of Christ might shine. I ask you to forgive, whatever that takes, and to move forward in faith, in hope, and in love.

I cannot (and don’t want to) look into the minds of liberals to figure out what they are really after, but if there is in those minds any shred of Catholic identity left, properly understood, any sense that Christ gave to Holy Church bishops and priests in Holy ORDERS, to order the Church for the sake of the salvation of souls, to sanctify, to teach, and also to govern, I suggest to the folks who have carried on this tumult against authority – regardless of how it was sparked off – to consider the implications of “formal warning and action”.

And you can bet they will read this.

In this day when a theology of the role of laity in Holy Church has been vastly expanded and our practical understanding expanded with it, something pretty dire must be going on when we read about a bishop who sees a possible need for canonical warnings.  That means there is spiritual peril on the horizon.

I pray that the lay people involved will give due consideration to all the elements of the bishop’s letter, which demonstrates a sincere effort to find a way through and beyond the conflict.

“But Father! But Father!” some of you are saying by now, “Why are you, with this big visible blog giving attention to something in a remote corner of the global Church?  Don’t you have bigger fish to fry?”

Yes, and no.

This sad situation in this small town underscores some important problems and we will be seeing a lot more of this in the future.

The decades following Vatican II devastated our Catholic identity.  Leaving aside for now the reasons for this, putting aside blame, we see more and more a sharp and outright rebellion against the Church’s teaching authority in faith and morals and also against her duly appointed, God-anointed pastors.  The poor catechesis and spirit of dissent, fostered for so long, is rumbling to the surface in an exaltation of improperly understood “rights”.  People who have no idea what they are talking about when they speak of their “rights” because they are “baptized” (or whatever – cf. the serpent’s lie to Adam and Eve), are claiming authority to themselves to do, essentially, as they please without reference to their vocations in the Church or the Church’s Magisterium.  There are ecclesiological strains building within many sectors of the Church’s life, like pressures that build on fault lines in the Earth’s crust.

Let’s put this another way and with a less seismological metaphor.

A properly understood and embraced Catholic identity does not mean that no one can say anything to authority.  But it does mean that roles in the Church must be recognized for what they are.  In the ancient Church there could be literal rioting in the streets when bishops and flocks were in conflict.  That’s what comes with the miter and staff.  That’s what comes from belonging to a Church made up of sinners… not made up primarily of sinners, but (in our Church Militant) entirely of sinners. Bishops, priests, religious, laity – every single one a sinner.  But in the end, when there are conflicts, it is the role of bishops to make the decisions.  We might not like the decisions. It may be hard to accept them.  We may think they are impractical, wrong, unjust.  But Catholics accept hard decisions in view of the long term, in view of a larger Church, in view of our vocations in the here and now.  We must learn through pain and tears to see that, yes, even in the hard decisions, God’s will shall come to pass, and that God’s will is always the best thing for us.

The Church has always had its share of cafeterias.  In these cafeterias we will always see ugly food fights.

Frankly, I think ugly food fights must happen from time to time.

But when the food has been thrown, and everyone is a little messy, it is time to clean up.

Let the people who start throwing food (the liberals who attacked the priests) remember that, at the end of the fight, there is less for people to eat. Because of their choice to fight, some are going to go hungry.

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", "How To..." - Practical Notes, Mail from priests, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , ,
33 Comments

“To me, the most serious element in all this was the breach of fundamental, liturgical consciousness.”

Please use the sharing buttons!  Thanks!

In Co-Workers of the Truth: Meditations for Every Day of the Year, from the works Joseph Ratzinger (you know who) for 25 April we read a blurb from his perennially useful Feast of Faith (US link HERE, US Kindle HERE, UK HERE, UK Kindle HERE):

“The Council did not create new articles of faith, nor did it replace existing ones with new ones. Its only concern was to make it possible to hold the same faith under different circumstances, to revitalize it. As for the work that preceded the Council, it seems to have been more intensive in Germany than elsewhere, for Germany was the heartland of the liturgical movement, the primary source in which the documents of the Council had their origin. But many of these documents were issued too abruptly. To many of the faithful, most of them seemed to be a challenge to the creativity of the individual congregation, in which separate groups constructed their own “liturgies” from week to week with a zeal that was as commendable as it was misplaced. To me, the most serious element in all this was the breach of fundamental, liturgical consciousness. The difference between liturgy and festivity, between liturgy and social event, disappeared gradually and imperceptibly, as witness the fact that many priests, imitating the etiquette of polite society, feel that they ought not to receive Holy Communion until the congregation has received; that they should no longer venture to say “I bless you” [German euch: familiar form of plural “you”]—thus dissolving the fundamental liturgical relationship between them and their congregation. In this context belong also the often obnoxious and banal greeting which, it must be admitted, many congregations tolerate with a kind of patient forbearance. In the period before the new missal made its appearance, but after the old one had already been characterized as “old-fashioned”, people forgot that there is a “rite”, that is, a prescribed liturgical form, and that liturgy is genuinely liturgy only if it is not subject to the will of those who celebrate it.”  See: The Feast of Faith, pp. 83–85.

Any effort of renewal of any sphere of our Church and lives must be preceded by and accompanied with a revitalization of our liturgical worship.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , ,
14 Comments

Ultra-liberal NPR manages decent interviews about the LCWR dust-up. Donna Bethell shines.

Please use the sharing buttons!  Thanks!

I read the transcript (there is also audio available) of an National Public Radio segment on the recent develops between the American Bishops, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (a subsidiary of the Magisterium on Nuns).

The players are the NPR interviewer, who despite working for this ultra-liberal outlet does a fair job, the nearly-ubiquitous John Allen of the Fishwrap, Donna Bethell, Chairman of the board of directors for Christendom College, Sr. Simone Campbell, executive director of NETWORK (one of the organizations associated with LCWR and under review by the Holy See).

Some great things happen in this interview.

Allen gave a workman-like summary of what is going on, but the really interesting stuff happens in the second part of the segment.

First, Donna Bethell really shines, hitting one after another out of the park.  Don’t miss her demolition of Sr. Campbell’s utilitarian eisegesis of Scripture moment of Our Lord and the Samaritan woman at the well.  Also, when a caller named “Mary” presented her point of view:

CONAN: So you don’t think that your disagreements on doctrine make you any less of a Catholic?

MARY: No, I think I’m a good Catholic. In fact, when I go to confession, I sit there, and I say: You know, I really don’t have a whole lot to say because I think I do a pretty good job. [The confessor heaves a sigh…] Maybe pride is my biggest sin. But no, I think I’m a good Catholic. I think our social doctrine, social justice doctrine is ignored, and we’re focusing on this contraception. [How paradigmatic this is!]

And when I’m out feeding people and helping women with three or four kids, they could probably do without all these kids with no family support. And to be pushing against contraception and pushing against, you know – and I get so – what was your question?

(SOUNDBITE OF LAUGHTER)

MARY: No, I don’t think it makes me worse of a Catholic. I think I’m a good Catholic if I pay attention to the doctrines that are important: Eucharist and social justice. I think our social – and taking care of the poor. That’s – that is what we’re supposed to be doing, and so few do.

CONAN: Mary, thanks very much for the call, appreciate it.

MARY: Thank you.

CONAN: And I wonder, Donna Bethell, that’s somebody who people would – some would uphold as a model, and others would say, well, that’s an a la carte Catholic.

BETHELL: Well, in effect she said she was an a la carte Catholic. She said that she was going to accept the things that were important to her. And I think she sounds like a wonderful lady, a very generous lady, a very warm and caring lady, and that’s just the sort of person that you would like to have as a Catholic.

I think she has not been presented, probably, with the fullness of Catholic doctrine. She probably has not been – had a full explanation to her of why contraception is a problem.

[…]

Anyway, if I ever run into Donna Bethell, I’d be happy to buy her lunch and thank her for her recent media appearances!

Take the time to read the transcript or listen to the audio.  There is a lot going on.  And you who have been reading here for a while will hear all the themes and cliches.

We could even try to create a list of themes to listen or watch for!

So, share your favorite bits here.

And listen for how Sr. Campbell tries (and fails) to back herself and NETWORK away from the Magisterium of Nuns.  Too good.

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Magisterium of Nuns, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , , , ,
26 Comments

Of whales and cannons and movies and burgers and consonants

I was flipping around on movie channels while flipping a burger for supper (lots of double consonants) and I caught this:

“He tasks me! He tasks me, and I shall have him! I’ll chase him round the Moons of Nibia, and round the Antares Maelstrom, and round perdition’s flames before I give him up! Prepare to alter course!”

You must know which movie this is!  The quote, however, is obviously an allusion to Moby Dick by Melville.  Ahab, obsessed with revenge against the white whale cries out:

“Aye, aye! It was that accursed white whale that razeed me; made a poor pegging lubber of me for ever and a day!” Then tossing both arms, with measureless imprecations he shouted out: “Aye, aye! and I’ll chase him round Good Hope, and round the Horn, and round the Norway Maelstrom, and round perdition’s flames before I give him up.”

More double consonants!  Too bad the whale’s blubber isn’t referred to there.

Moby Dick is a favorite of reference point for Star Trek movies, I think.  In another one, First Contact, Picard says:

“And he piled upon the whale’s white hump the sum of all the rage and hate felt by his whole race. If his chest had been a cannon, he would have shot his heart upon it.”

Cannon!

In Moby Dick the real quote:

“He piled upon the whale’s white hump the sum of all the general rage and hate felt by his whole race from Adam down; and then, as if his chest had been a mortar, he burst his hot heart’s shell upon it.”

Come to think of it, a character in another vast SiFi series is named from a character in Moby Dick.  So, through I am in the middle of prepping supper, and the burger zizzles and I must away to put creatures in my body (trekkies will get the reference), I thought I would scribble this note. As soon as possible I will butter and grill the bun on the griddle and, all hassles aside, take the opportunity to apply pepper and drizzle mustard.

Burgers are a dish best not served up cold, after all.

I was out of gagh.

[wp_youtube]wRnSnfiUI54[/wp_youtube]

UPDATE:

I had forgotten that the movie ends with a quote not from Melville, but from Dickens.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged , , , , ,
36 Comments

Mike Malloy (liberal radio talk-show host) calls Pope “Nazi scum” and all Catholics “child-raping sons of bitches”

Here is something I saw on CMR:

Lib Radio Host: “Scum, Nazi Pope.”

Remember when everyone in the media lit their torches and sharpened their pitchforks for Rush Limbaugh for calling a woman who wanted the Catholic Church to pay for her contraception a “slut.”

But last week a liberal radio host in discussing the Hilary Rosen/Ann Romney story, called Catholics “child-raping sons of bitches” and then dropped the “Nazi scum” moniker on Pope Benedict XVI. But oddly,this outburst has hardly caused a ripple among the powers that be.

According to Google News, there has not been one mainstream media story. Not one.

Here’s the transcript from Newsbusters and I warn you, it’s pretty offensive.

MALLOY: And the Catholic League – that piece of human waste Bill Donohue – then twitted or tweeted or tweaked – ‘glad to know Hilary’s fans are in a state of apoplexy – you’d think she was outed by their hysterical reaction. Get over it and grow up! You child-raping sons of bitches in the Catholic Church, I am so sick of all of you – especially your priests and your bishops and your scum, the Nazi Pope, I am so sick of all of you. And this Donohue freak — wow.

Can you honestly imagine saying similar things about any other group of people without becoming the lead story on Anderson Cooper? Jews? Muslims? Gays? Heck, I don’t even think you could say that about oil men and get away with it.But denigrating Catholics with truly offensive language is just completely ignored.

I wonder if President Obama will call Pope Benedict like he did Sandra Fluke. I’m sure Pope Benedict will be waiting by the phone.

I have never heard of Mike Malloy.  His page is HERE.
I think this is a list of the stations which carries his show.  HERE. If you are in the area of one of these stations, you might call the manager and express your opinion about what they are broadcasting.
Posted in The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , ,
47 Comments

A shift in the cyber meaning of “pro-life”?

Dictionaries are important. When dictionaries change there can be wide repercussions. For example, when the standard reference point for American English back in the day, Webster, changed their basic approach, their lexicographical theory, as it were, from being being proscriptive (saying what a word means and ought to mean) to being descriptive (saying how a word is being used), the ground for the meaning of words and communication started to get squishier.

Back in the day when I was studying German, I learned about the differences in the definitions of the same word in dictionaries made in West Germany (in the free West) and East Germany (under Communist domination). Off the top of my head, I can’t think of a particular term that had disparate meanings on either side of the Iron Curtain, but imagine how commies would want to have certain political and economic terms tilted in a favorable or unfavorable direction.

Today I read an entry on Life News:

Wikipedia May Redefine Term “Pro-Life” in Every Abortion Entry
by Ryan Bomberger

Yesterday, official discussion ended in Wikipedia’s effort to possibly redefine the abortion debate according to its contributors’ worldviews.

Wikipedia, which ranks 6th in the United States and globally as the most accessed website, is not known for its accuracy nor impartiality. [On the other hand, if a printed book gets something wrong, it will still be wrong tomorrow.  Wikipedia can be corrected.] From reporting people dead before their death (Ted Kennedy, Miley Cirus, Sinbad) to defaming the famous (Bill Gates, Rush Limbaugh, Fuzzy Zoeller) to contributors posing as authoritative figures and then being debunked (supposed professor of religion exposed as 24 year old college dropout) the online encyclopedia is a constant source of controversy.

Wikipedia’s bias toward abortion is nothing new. Conservapedia (which itself reveals bias and incomplete information) lists a handful of examples that only scratch the surface of Wiki’s glaringly evident pro-abortion advocacy. A more recent example of the absurdity of contributor-bias is Wikipedia’s Maafa 21 entry. It asserts that the film “has been praised by pro-life activists and condemned by historical scholars, pro-choice activists, and other writers…”

Apparently, pro-life activists are not historical scholars, or medical professionals, or professors, or other types of educators…just nebulous “activists”.

The article then avoids any of the actual substance of the thoroughly researched documentary and instead relies upon mostly unattributed assertions or feelings about Planned Parenthood. Most noticeably, however, is the ratio of Support versus Criticism in the entry with 5 sentences supporting the documentary and 20 criticizing it. Nowhere in any of the criticism is any actual assertion proven wrong in Maafa 21.  [Perhaps more people with credentials should get involved with Wikipedia?]

The closest the pro-abortion critics come to denying anything specific is in the false accusation that the Negro Project was cast as an abortion initiative, when clearly the documentary (if any of the contributors actually watched the film) presented the initiative as a failed birth control initiative.

Within its official “discussion”, numerous options are provided in changing the vernacular Wikipedia will pursue in addressing abortion in the United States. Its bias toward the ever genteel sounding “abortion rights” is summed up in one assertion found under “Arguments regarding Support for the Toleration of Abortion/Opposition to the Toleration of Abortion”, stating: “virtually no one is in favour of abortion per se”. Yes, Wikipedia, there are many who are in favor of abortion-on-demand for any reason and at any point in a woman’s pregnancy—Planned Parenthood, NARAL, NOW, International Planned Parenthood Federation, ACLU et al.

Wikipedia never opted to include the labeling choice “Opposition to care for both women and (born/unborn) child” versus “Support for care for both women and (born/unborn) child”, pro-abortion and pro-life respectively. It goes to show how myopic a Wikipedia worldview of abortion is and continues to be. Liberals always define the pro-life side as “in opposition” to or “anti” something. These gatekeepers of voluminous misinformation have the audacity to point to mainstream media’s depiction of each side of the abortion debate as proof that they should follow suit.

Invoking the AP, NY Times, CBS News, NPR and other blatantly biased news networks’ use of “anti-abortion” and “abortion rights” to define each side apparently doesn’t immediately strike these self-described “neutral administrators” of the inherent bias.

Bias is the natural result of agenda-driven funding. Wikimedia Foundation’s short list of major donors includes two of the largest population control organizations: the Ford Foundation and the Hewlett Foundation. Both of these organizations have poured hundreds of millions into population control efforts including the Planned Parenthood Federation of America and the International Planned Parenthood Federatio–the world’s largest killers of the unborn. In fact, Cecile Richards, President of Planned Parenthood, is a recent Board Member of the Ford Foundation.

Funny. Like so many other crucial and relevant details, that fact isn’t mentioned on Wikipedia.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
18 Comments

A reader on going back to Confession, the Sacrament of Penance

From a reader:

I’ve been reading your blog for a few years and I wanted to write and thank you for continually posting about getting back to the Sacrament of Confession. For the past 3 years I have been discerning a call to the priesthood. I knew that to discern properly I needed to get back to Confession, but your blog and insistence on going really brought me back to the Sacrament and made it less “scary” as it has always seemed. It was a truly awesome experience and confession has made helped my discernment so much that I was recently accepted as a seminarian for ….

To all the Priests that may read your blog: I hope they would consider offering confessions more than once a week at their parish. They’d be pleasantly surprised at the response from the faithful! Keep spreading the Good Word!

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION, Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
10 Comments

Sally Quinn of WaPo: a lesson in getting it wrong.

Sally Quinn of WaPo offers her stunningly shallow take on the reforming efforts by the Holy See and USCCB now being applied to the LCWR (a subsidiary of the Magisterium of Nuns).

Aside from the risible claims Quinn makes, I found this part amusing:

While the “radical feminist” nuns were taking care of the poor and the sick, what were the priests and bishops doing? More than a few were being accused of sexually abusing children and covering up for each other.

[…]

This is worthy of special attention not because of the increasingly cliché liberal tactic of throwing out the child abuse issue every single time the Catholic Church acts like the Catholic Church ought to act, but because the very LCWR Quinn is defending has itself cooperated in the cover-up of sexual abuse of children by women religious.

Don’t take my word for it.

It seems that even SNAP (and I am no great fan) protested at a meeting of the LCWR in 2010 because the leaders of the LCWR (the darlings of Sally Quinn’s defense) were resisting and squelching every effort to get them to come clean about the sexual abuse of children inflicted by women religious.

Even the National catholic Fishwrap… er… Reporter wrote about this.

To quote the Fishwrap:

[SNAP director David Clohessy] said that in coming forward and sharing the pain, healing can finally take place. The second reason for the conference, he said, was to send a message to the women religious leadership that it should do more to “come clean” about abusive nuns. He called for LCWR to develop a national abuse policy that could be a model for the bishops and for the entire world. Sadly, he said, efforts to work with LCWR have been rebuffed for the past six years.

During these past six years, Clohessy said, SNAP has repeatedly asked to address LCWR at its annual national gathering, a request that has been denied. He said SNAP has also asked LCWR to allow a SNAP link on the LCWR website and to give SNAP the names of regional women religious sex abuse victim coordinators, requests that have also been denied, he said.

Maybe Sally Quinn could do some real reporting and write an article about women religious who abused children.

There is a lot of material out there on the internet… if you look for it.

And WDTPRS has looked for it.

 

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Clerical Sexual Abuse, Dogs and Fleas, Magisterium of Nuns, The Drill, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , , ,
16 Comments

Ex ore infantium perfecisti laudem! A must see video.

This is stupendous.  Take a few minutes to watch this.

[wp_youtube]5LFPTwVMUVE[/wp_youtube]

Biretta tip to Kathryn Lopez.

Posted in Just Too Cool |
22 Comments