Sec. Sebelius already barred from Holy Communion under can. 915

I want to remind everyone of something that The Canonical Defender wrote on his fine blog.

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, a major proponent of the Obama administration’s push to mandate contraceptive coverage regardless of religious conviction, is already barred from holy Communion as a result of her pro-abortion activities while governor of Kansas. Bishops in the Washington DC area declared their intention to honor Bp. Naumann’s 2008 directive, and I’ve not heard of any change in the situation. In other words, no reasonably well-informed Catholic believes that, in conducting herself as she does, Sebelius is acting as a Catholic entrusted with high public office ought to act. Thus, the scandal that Sebelius gives is significantly reduced.

Considering the spiritual consequences, we should pray for her.

Posted in 1983 CIC can. 915, Dogs and Fleas, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , , ,
18 Comments

All 180 diocesan US bishops have issued a statement about Pres. Obama’s attack.

The young papist, Peters Fils, has been tracking the response of the US Bishops to Pres. Obama’s attack on the 1st Amendment and, specifically, on the Catholic Church.

He has good news.

All 180 diocesan bishops have issued a statement concern Pres. Obama’s attack.

Now he is also tracking the list of Catholic institutions which have reacted against Pres. Obama’s attack through the HHS mandate.

This was unthinkable just a few years ago.

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty | Tagged , , , ,
36 Comments

USCCB: “Seis cosas más que todos debemos saber sobre el mandato del departamento de salud y servicios humanos (HHS)”

From the USCCB Blog, the Spanish language version of what they have previously posted in English.

1. La disposición que ha creado tanto alboroto no ha cambiado para nada las cosas, sino que todo ha terminado como estaba. […]

2. La disposición deja abierta la posibilidad de que hasta los “empleadores religiosos” exentos están obligados a cubrir la esterilización. […]

3. La nueva “concesión” no es una regulación, sino una promesa que queda pendiente para más adelante, pasado el tiempo de pedir responsabilidades públicamente ante los electores. […]

4. Aun cuando todas las promesas de un “arreglo” se realicen en su totalidad, los grupos religiosos de caridades, escuelas y hospitales estarán forzados a violar sus creencias. […]

5. La promesa de “concesiones” ni siquiera trata de ofrecer apoyo a aquellos aseguradores que presenten una objeción de conciencia, a los empleadores religiosos con fines de lucro, a los empleadores laicos, o a personas individuales. […]

6. Cuidado con las afirmaciones, especialmente las partidistas, de que los obispos son partidistas. […]

Aquí podrá encontrar las primeras seis observaciones de la Conferencia de Obispos Católicos de Estados Unidos referentes al mandato de HHS

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , ,
2 Comments

Catholic League on Sebelius’s admission before a Senate committee

SebeliusYesterday I saw video clips of Kathleen Sebelius, catholic Dem who as Pres. Obama’s patsy is implementing his anti-Catholic agenda, testifying before a Senate committee. She admitted that the Administration did not to any significant degree consult with the US bishops before issuing their mandate. Of course, the Administration didn’t care what the bishops would have said. The President was going to do this no matter what.

From The Catholic League:

OBAMA MANDATE NEVER SCRUTINIZED

February 16, 2012

Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments as follows:

Following her testimony yesterday before the Senate Finance Committee, Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Kathleen Sebelius was asked whether she spoke to the bishops about the controversial mandate she is pushing. She admitted she did not. Then she said, “I know that the president has spoken to the bishops on several occasions.”

Sebelius is wrong. Bishop William Lori, who heads the bishops’ Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty, said this week that administration officials should have sat down with the bishops. “That certainly did not happen,” he said. Archbishop Timothy Dolan, who heads the bishops’ conference, met once with the president, and that was three months ago; the two phone calls he has had since were to inform him that the bishops’ religious liberty concerns would not be honored.

Under questioning from Sen. Orrin Hatch, Sebelius further admitted that HHS never subjected the religious liberty issues to a legal analysis, as requested by 27 senators. She also admitted that she never asked the Justice Department to consider this issue.

It gets worse. Today’s New York Times reports today that the administration announced the Obama mandate “before it had figured out how to address one conspicuous point: Like most large employers, many religiously affiliated organizations choose to insure themselves rather than hire an outside company to assume the risk.” As the Times points out, this is not a slight issue: 60 percent of all workers with health insurance are covered by a self-funded plan, and the figure jumps to 82 percent for large companies. And no one bothered to address this?

So they refused to consult with the bishops; they refused to weigh the First Amendment religious liberty concerns; and they refused to study how the mandate might impact self-insured companies. In other words, with characteristic arrogance, they just “winged it.” Wait until the Supreme Court hears all of this.

Contact our director of communications about Donohue’s remarks:
Jeff Field
Phone: 212-371-3191
E-mail: cl@catholicleague.org

The bishops need to start using can. 915.

Posted in 1983 CIC can. 915, Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , ,
28 Comments

In for a penny

For your Just Too Cool file from the History Blog:

A metal detector enthusiast has discovered a unique silver penny issued by William the Conqueror in a field north of Gloucester. Maureen Jones and two other women from the Taynton Metal Detecting Club were exploring the open field last November when Ms. Jones’ detector went off. She recognized that it was a hammered silver coin, but didn’t realize that was the face of the Norman bastard himself staring back at her from the obverse.

[…]

It is a William I silver penny minted between 1077 and 1080 in Gloucester.

How cool would it be to find something like that?

I’d settle for finding, say, the second book of Aristotle’s Poetics or the rest of Livy’s Ab Urbe condita.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
22 Comments

What’s on your reading/listening list right now?

KindleSlated for reading on my Kindle right now:

Ameritopia

I think he might have not quite understood St. Thomas More’s notion of Utopia, but he is exceptionally good.

Vince Flynn

More Mitch Rapp from my homey, Vince Flynn.  Prequel.

Kydd

Hoping it will be a tenth as good as Patrick O’Brian.

Slated for listening on my iPhone/iPod:

Homer

It is good to review.  I got this from Audible.  I don’t know if the link will work.

Paul Creston

I learned about this composer from the great Fr. Perrone.

Jesu Dulcis Memoria

Wonderful motets.  Every one of them.

On my desk slated for reading:

Deaconesses

The definitive book on the matter.  I read it years ago, but need to review.  Lots of nutty ideas going around these days about this issue.

Another view of the Roman Canon, and that is all I use.

Could there have been a better title?  It is polemical in spots.  Gosh!  Who knew?

I am also getting some things together for Lent.

Posted in What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged , , , , ,
92 Comments

What does the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei” do?

Does the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei” do anything?

I received a note from a reader together with an image of a letter he received back from the PCED concerning the fact that, on the Vatican’s website, the text of Summorum Pontificum is still available only in Latin and Hungarian.

What did the PCED respond?  It is the Secretariat of State’s sphere of concern.

Secretary of State

You can click for a larger version.

Notice that this is just a form letter, probably not written by an English speaker, signed by nobody, given no protocol number, but at least with the stamp of the Commission.

QUAERITUR [bis]:

Msgr. Guido Pozzo
Secretary of the
Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei
Palazzo del Sant’Uffizio
00120 Vatican City

Reverend and Dear Monsignor,

The Instruction Universae Ecclesiae states in par. 8 that “the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum constitutes an important expression of the Magisterium of the Roman Pontiff and of his munus of regulating and ordering the Church’s Sacred Liturgy.”

Why, in this digital age, is Summorum Pontificum, released in 2007, available only in Latin and Hungarian on the Holy See’s website?

Please, Monsignor, urge that translations of Summorum Pontificum be made available on the Holy See’s website in the major modern languages generally recognized and used in the Roman Curia when important documents of the Holy Father’s Magisterium are released.

With gratitude for the work of the Pontifical Commission and with a promise of prayers for you and your collaborators, I am

Sincerely yours in Christ.

Fr. John Zuhlsdorf
wdtprs.com

Posted in SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM |
35 Comments

Spirit spotted on Mars

The intreprid little Mars rover Spirit, which began its mission in 2004 died, mired in sand, in 2009. It couldn’t capture enough sunlight to power up.

Spirit’s twin Opportunity is still going strong!

The orbiting Phoenix, circling Mars since 2006, recently caught sight of Spirit.

Spirit

Poor little Spirit.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged , , , ,
6 Comments

QUAERITUR: School principal orders girl not to wear a chapel veil during Mass

From a reader:

My daughter attending Catholic school at our novus parish determined after reading 1 Corinthians that she should be wearing a chapel veil at Mass. She began wearing it at Sunday Mass two months ago. However, when she tried to wear it at Friday daily Mass during school, the principal made her remove it, referring to the dress code. I argued with the principal that a sacramental is not subject to the dress code. She referred the subject to the priest (self-proclaimed child of VII) who backed the school rather than the Bible.
Do you see any point in pushing this further? Note: we don’t attend the novus anymore as there is now a latin Mass nearby.

You would think they would be pleased to see that a girl was serious about her faith and trying to be reverent at Mass.  But nooooo…. liberal ideology trumps common sense once again.

You have every right to pursue this matter with the diocese. A reasonable priest and principal would make a reasonable accommodation to their dress code, but, it seems, we’re no longer living in reasonable times.

HOWEVER… I suggest NOT pursuing this with the diocese right now, mostly for the girl’s sake. You would probably end up in a nasty battle.

It rarely pays to argue with the obtuse.

This could be a good opportunity chat with your daughter about respect for authority, even when they are wrong.

When faced with an order that’s just plain wrong, we have to use our God-given reason to discern whether obeying the authority (unless the order is against divine or natural law) could be the better course for growth in holiness.

But… wouldn’t it be great if all of a sudden all the girls showed up wearing chapel veils?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged ,
73 Comments

Lent begins in one week! Have you made your plan.

Pre-Lent

Updated:

Lent begins in a week, 22 February this year.

It is time to make your plans for Lent.

You should start thinking about one or more mortifications (and consider something other than chocolate) as well as some corporal and/or spiritual work of mercy to pursue during Lent.

Before Lent starts make a plan for your meals and for your participation at Mass and the Sacrament of Penance.

Don’t let this go until Thursday after Ash Wednesday.

Write some ideas down and stick them to your refrigerator door or on the bathroom mirror.  Talk about this with your spouses.  Revisit the ideas for the next two Sundays to see if they need some realistic tweaking or refinement.

Perhaps parents could make some suggestions for a family observance of Lent, including pointers for children, so as to make it meaningful but not overly burdensome on those who are not bound to do heavy penances.

Also, for some reading during Lent you might consider our Holy Father’s two volumes about our Lord.

Volume One focuses on our Lord from His Baptism in the Jordan to His Transfiguration, themes explored during our liturgical worship in Lent.

Jesus of Nazareth

(UK readers click HERE.)

Volume Two focuses on Holy Week, from the Lord’s entrance into Jerusalem to His Resurrection.

Jesus of Nazareth

(UK readers click HERE.)

They are both available on Kindle.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, GO TO CONFESSION, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , ,
61 Comments