QUAERITUR: Can I be a pall bearer for my non-Catholic grandfather’s funeral?

From a reader:

My Grandfather died yesterday, may he rest in peace, and he was a Presbyterian. My immediate family including my Grandfather’s eldest child (my Mother) are Roman Catholics (my Mother is a convert).

As a Catholic, I am assuming that I may attend the Protestant funeral but is it permissible for me to be a pallbearer? Or would that be participating in a Protestant religious service?

Additionally, how am I to act if I am permitted to attend a Protestant Funeral?

I feel very uneasy being around anything non-Catholic.

I am sure the readers here will, as I just have, stopped to say a prayer for your grandfather.

Yes, you can go to the funeral and, yes, you can be a pall bearer for your grandfather.  That does not constitute participation in a non-Catholic religious rite.

Be at ease about this.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
5 Comments

QUAERITUR: Going to SSPX priest for absolution of excommunication

Despite the fact that I wrote pretty clearly in my post about forgiveness, confession, censures, excommunication, and abortion that email isn’t a good medium for solving serious problems, I am getting email from people asking about their own situations.

How I wish I could solve everyone’s problems.

I am acutely aware that people in some places have a hard time finding a priest whom they trust.  But email is not a good medium for these sorts of things.

You really do need to seek out a solid priest in your area, even if you have to drive a while, and do things in person.  Even if I could answer everyone’s email – and it is physically impossible for me  – I cannot through email or phone or skype or any other method absolve either censures or sins.  This is the sort of thing that must be done personally, in the presence of the penitent.

Also, perhaps it is time to overcome some trust issues about priests in your area.  Some people write and say that there is not a single good priest around where they live.  REALLY?  I find that hard to believe.  And there is always the local bishop, even if it requires nagging for an appointment and a long drive.  If you say you think you have a problem of having incurred an excommunication, that tends to get a priest’s or a bishop’s attention.

When faced with penitents with serious problems, even goofy liberals seem to sober up and get focused.

Furthermore, if you are going for confession and absolution of a censure, that doesn’t mean you have to invite the guy to supper or start liking the way he preaches.  His job is to give you the benefit of the sacraments and the Church’s jurisdiction over censures.  Also, you don’t have to like him or enjoy the experience of making the confession and getting the censure lifted.  After all… who cares?  You want the censure lifted.  Go get it done.  Ask him to do his job and do it right for the sake of your peace and immortal soul.

That said I will add a response to a question I received, because I know there are a lot of followers of the SSPX who read this blog.

I do not mean this in any polemical intention.  I am simply going to answer the question factually.

From a reader:

I confessed abortion many years ago to a priest of the SSPX. Later I
was worried that this confession was not valid, and that I was
excommunicated. I raised it with a diocesan priest in confession who
replied “a priest is a priest”. I still worry from time to time that
I’m not absolved and may even be under excommunication. Can you
explain?

Here is the deal, friend.

That priest who said “a priest is a priest” is right, in that the priests of the SSPX are validly ordained.  But priests need to have permission of the Church to absolve sins validly.  They have to have what is called a “faculty” from proper authority to exercise this ministry for the Church.

This is a little different from what SSPX priests do when they say Mass.   When they say Mass, they validly confect the Eucharist.  No question.  They do so illicitly but validly.  But when it comes to absolution of sins, the Church’s law says that the priest must have permission to absolve validly.

In the Code of Canon Law, can. 966 §1 says that the validly ordained priest must have faculties, i.e. permission, in order to absolve validly:

“The valid absolution of sins requires that the minister have, in addition to the power of orders, the faculty of exercising it for the faithful to whom he imparts absolution.”

Can. 976 says that when someone is in danger of death then any validly ordained priest has the faculty to absolve validly, even if the priest has been out of ministry voluntarily or has been expelled, even if there is an active, regular priest there.  But the situation itself is what constitutes the basis, in that moment, for the priest to have the faculty to absolve.

Again, priests don’t have faculties because they want them.  They have them because they have been granted them by proper authority, usually the priest’s diocesan bishop and/or religious superior.

The priests of the SSPX, or – not to single them out – Sedevacantist or other independent priest, do not have faculties to receive confessions, which -as is clear from the law – is required by the Church’s law for validity.  Also, they do not have any authority to lift any censure.  Who would give it to them?  The bishops of the Society have no authority to grant any kind of faculty to any priest.  They, too, are suspended from the exercise of Holy Orders.

Some will argue that of late there are situations in which SSPX priests have been assumed to absolve validly.  It may be that some of them in some circumstances have sought faculties from a local diocesan bishop the faculty to do X, Y or Z.  In that case, the priest might have obtained the necessary faculty from proper authority.  Great!  That is a great step in the right direction.  Some will argue that lack of knowledge on the part of the penitent is enough to make whatever happened valid.  Oh yah?  Really?  Are we sure about that?

Without going into those claim in any detail, the Church’s Canon Law remains pretty clear.  Any claims to the contrary are doubtful claims or they involve particular instances that do not establish any general overriding of the Church’s law.

Bottom line: Is it worth it, really worth it, to fool around with something this serious?

Go to any local parish, even one where the clappy happy rubbish is going on, and the priest there will more than likely have the faculty from the local bishop to lift the censure that is incurred by participating directly in an abortion.  In the USA, at least, I think it is now standard operating procedure for bishops to grant the faculty to his diocesan priests to absolve the excommunication.  It may be that the bishops of some places have given permission only to certain confessors, say at the cathedral or some shrine, to absolve the excommunication.  This is easily determined where you live by means of a couple simple questions which are entirely within the right of the faithful to ask.

Think about it this way: the local parish priest might be a dope, he might be a liberal heretic, he might be a sloppy or a bad confessor, but … he has faculties to hear confessions and lift the censure. Sadly, the smart cassock-wearing, prayerful priest at the SSPX chapel does not.

That’s just the way it is and it is one reason why I sincerely look forward to the reconciliation of the SSPX priests as soon as possible.

If there is even the slightest doubt that an SSPX priest, or – not to single them out – Sedevacantist or other independent priest has faculties to absolve and no authority at all to lift censures, it is really a good idea to seek that route when you know or suspect that you have a censure?  Really?

Please find a solid priest in your area who is in union with the Church and lay out the story to him.  He should be able to help.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
Comments Off on QUAERITUR: Going to SSPX priest for absolution of excommunication

An exploration of two Collects, Extraordinary Form and Ordinary

This morning I used the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite for Holy Mass, as is my wont, and therefore celebrated the feast of St. John Eudes.   But one of our long-time readers alerted me to the differences between the Collect of the EF and the Collect for St. John’s day in the Ordinary Form (also today).

Shall we have a look?

Let’s compare the Collects for St. John Eudes in both the Extraordinary Form and the Ordinary Form.

1962
Deus, qui beatum Ioannem, Confessorem tuum,
ad cultum sacrorum Cordium Iesu et Mariae rite promovendum,
mirabiliter inflammasti,
et per eum novas in Ecclesia tua familias congregare voluisti:
praesta, quaesumus;
ut, cuius pia merita veneramur,
virtutum quoque instruamur exemplis
.

2002 (1970 etc):
Deus, qui beatum Ioannem presbyterum
ad annuntiandum investigabilies Christi divitias
mirabiliter elegisti,
da nobis, eius exemplo et monitis,
ut, in tua scientiae crescentes,
secundum Evangelii lumen fideliter conversemur
.

1962:
O God, Who wondrously enkindled St. John, Your Confessor, to promote the religious veneration of the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary, and through him willed to found new religious families in the Church; grant, we beseech You, that we may honor his holy merits and may learn from the example of his virtues.

1973 ICEL:
Father, you chose the priest John Eudes to preach the infinite riches of Christ. By his teaching and example help us to know you better and live faithfully in the light of the gospel.

2011 ICEL:
O God, who wonderfully chose the Priest Saint John Eudes to proclaim the unfathomable riches of Christ, grant us, by his example and teachings, that, growing in knowledge of you, we may live faithfully by the light of the Gospel.

You see… it isn’t just the faults of the 1973 that changed the theology of prayers.  The Latin prayers themselves were changed.

Observations?

What sense do you get from the different prayers?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Drill, WDTPRS | Tagged ,
15 Comments

QUAERITUR: How to do an emergency baptism.

From a reader:

It’s getting close to my wife’s due date, and since her pregnancy is considered high risk, I wanted to be prepared for every condition. If there is a need to preform an emergency baptism at the hospital when my daughter is born, is there an official “rite” that needs to be followed? In an emergency, I’m not sure a priest would be able to make it to the hospital in time so I want to prepare myself in case I would need to baptize her myself. Thanks for your help on this.

First of all, I think the readers here will stop this instant and say a prayer for your wife and child, that everything go well and smoothly.

In case of an emergency, anyone – even a non-believer – can baptize an infant validly.  They must cause water to flow on the head while saying – and it must be the same person – the words “I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.”  That short form and the pouring of water on the head is all that is needed for valid baptism in an emergency.  Some medical personnel, such as nurses, will often be sensitive during emergencies and will even know what to do.

If the water cannot for some reason be poured on the head, then it can be poured over another part of the body.  If that is the case, however, then there must be a conditional baptism performed if the child survives.

In either case, when the child survives the full rites surrounding the baptism should be celebrated when possible.

However, will all will pray for a perfect and happy outcome.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
37 Comments

Benedict XVI to young people: “Let nothing and no one take away your peace; do not be ashamed of the Lord.”

When Benedict XVI arrived in Madrid, Spain for World Youth Day, he made a speech at the airport.  Here is the salient part of his address:

[…]

Why has this multitude of young people come to Madrid? While they themselves should give the reply, it may be supposed that they wish to hear the word of God, as the motto for this World Youth Day proposed to them, in such a way that, rooted and built upon Christ, they may manifest the strength of their faith.

Many of them have heard the voice of God, perhaps only as a little whisper, which has led them to search for him more diligently and to share with others the experience of the force which he has in their lives. The discovery of the living God inspires young people and opens their eyes to the challenges of the world in which they live, with its possibilities and limitations. They see the prevailing superficiality, consumerism and hedonism, the widespread banalization of sexuality, the lack of solidarity, the corruption. They know that, without God, it would be hard to confront these challenges and to be truly happy, and thus pouring out their enthusiasm in the attainment of an authentic life. But, with God beside them, they will possess light to walk by and reasons to hope, unrestrained before their highest ideals, which will motivate their generous commitment to build a society where human dignity and true brotherhood are respected. Here on this Day, they have a special opportunity to gather together their aspirations, to share the richness of their cultures and experiences, motivate each other along a journey of faith and life, in which some think they are alone or ignored in their daily existence. But they are not alone. Many people of the same age have the same aspirations and, entrusting themselves completely to Christ, know that they really have a future before them and are not afraid of the decisive commitments which fulfill their entire lives. That is why it gives me great joy to listen to them, pray with them and celebrate the Eucharist with them. World Youth Day brings us a message of hope like a pure and youthful breeze, with rejuvenating scents which fill us with confidence before the future of the Church and the world.

Of course, there is no lack of difficulties. There are tensions and ongoing conflicts all over the world, even to the shedding of blood. Justice and the unique value of the human person are easily surrendered to selfish, material and ideological interests. Nature and the environment, created by God with so much love, are not respected. Moreover, many young people look worriedly to the future, as they search for work, or because they have lost their job or because the one they have is precarious or uncertain. There are others who need help either to avoid drugs or to recover from their use. There are even some who, because of their faith in Christ, suffer discrimination which leads to contempt and persecution, open or hidden, which they endure in various regions and countries. They are harassed to give him up, depriving them of the signs of his presence in public life, not allowing even the mention of his holy name.

But, with all my heart, I say again to you young people: let nothing and no one take away your peace; do not be ashamed of the Lord. He did not spare himself in becoming one like us and in experiencing our anguish so as to lift it up to God, and in this way he saved us.

[…]

Posted in New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Pope of Christian Unity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
16 Comments

In praise of the cassock from an unexpected source

The cassock is the proper garb of the Roman priest.  It is true that conferences to bishops can determine other forms of garb for priests, such as the black suit and Roman or military collar (or in Italy also dark blue and gray), but the cassock remains the proper garb of the priest.

Since the Councils of Baltimore, in the USA, as in England, it was not the custom of Catholic priests to go about the world in the cassock.  They used the cassock at home and while engaged in their ministry, but at other times they were to wear, back in the day, the frock coat and some sort of clerical collar or neckcloth.  So, in the USA priests of a certain age have it pretty much drilled into them that the cassock is not proper “street attire”.

That seems to be changing.  The strictures of the Council of Baltimore don’t seem to apply anymore.  There aren’t a lot of frock coats around nowadays anyway, though I knew a priest who had one…. and wore it.  Younger priests today seem quite willing to use the cassock as street attire.  Times are a changin’

On that note, I read an interesting by our friends at Rorate, which I share with added emphases.

From what used to be, until 1991, the official daily of the Italian Communist Party, L’Unità, founded by Antonio Gramsci in 1924:

The Cassock
The Church has been for quite some time strenuously defending herself from a media-driven movement that has turned on the lights on the phenomenon of the erotic activities and aberrations of the clergy. And it is not only about the horrors of pedophilia, but also red-light feasts, orgies, and clandestine sorties of every kind. Abandoning the cassock and wearing civilian clothes, many priests have gone from the sacred onto the secular in no time. I ask a friend who writes for this paper, Father Filippo Di Giacomo, if it would not be more appropriate, for him and for his jolly colleagues, to renounce walking around in civilian clothes and go back to wearing the long habit of the priest. It would not be embarrassing to wear it, on the contrary, it would be a sign of respect for the Catholic community and would even have the power of eliminating any ambiguity. It is hard to recognize a priest from a fellow in a shirt: we are in the presence of a deception, at least at the semiotic level. My friend Di Giacomo should throw his “lay” habits out of the window and launch an appeal to all priests in the world that it be forbidden to wear anything except for two cassocks: one of wool for winter, and one of cotton for summer. This will certainly not deter the truly possessed from eros, but will keep at bay the profusion of numerous, small daily corruptions. It is said, in general that “l’abito non fa il monaco” [“the habit does not a monk make”], but it is not thus for the Church: the habit must make the monk. Catholicism, as other religions, lives off of symbols, of rites, of chastity, of foundational and unrenounceable values, of faithfulness to doctrine, of rigorous obedience to priestly rules. The cassock, at the simple sight, conveys to us all this: much spirit and little flesh. A priest who replaces his cassock with plains clothes gives up the spirit, as it were.

August 15, 2011 [Vincenzo Cerami]

Perhaps the Council for the New Evangelization could issue a statement about the cassock.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Just Too Cool, Lighter fare, Mail from priests, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices |
37 Comments

The most important thing I will ever write on this blog

This is the most important thing I will ever write on this blog. If I get nothing else through to any reader here, long-time visitor or new, I would want it to be this.

There is no sin that we little mortal humans can commit which is so bad that our infinite and loving God will not forgive us, provided that we are sorry for our sins and ask for God’s forgiveness.

The way that our Savior Himself desired that we confess our sins and receive forgiveness is through the sacrament He instituted while still with us on earth, the sacrament of penance/reconciliation.

When you confess all the mortal sins you are aware of to a priest confessor and he gives you absolution, those sins are gone, removed, taken away. They are no more. They are not just covered over. They are not just ignored. They are no more. The sin may have been horrible, as red as blood and scarlet. You may still have the burden of the memory and other scars from that sin. You may have a lot of penance to do because of that sin. You might need additional help or counseling. But when you receive sacramental absolution, you have been washed clean in the Blood of Christ, who died for your salvation and who forgives you through the person of the priest. When you receive absolution for your good, sincere confession, you have been forgiven. And you can know that you have been forgiven and not just have to guess or wonder or hope.

Everything we have been given by Christ through Holy Church aims at bringing as many people as possible to the happiness of heaven. Nothing else is more important than that goal.

You don’t have to live in the knowledge of your unforgiven sins. You can seek reconciliation. And when you obtain it, you don’t have to doubt it.

Since I posted about the visiting priests in Spain at WYD receiving from the local bishop the faculty to lift excommunications resulting from procuring an abortion I have been getting notes in my email from people who are filled with anxiety, afraid that they are in spiritual danger or that they have not been forgiven their past sin, sometimes many years in the past. A few people are really scared about this.

It is good to be scared about sins. A little fear is healthy and pushes us to get ourselves in order. A lot of fear, too much fear, is unhealthy and can paralyze us rather than motivate us. Sometimes lack of knowledge about something makes us more afraid than we have to be. Knowledge about the Church’s teachings and laws can not only spur us to a little anxious action, but can also put us at our ease, reassure us that we didn’t actually do wrong or incur a censure we were worried about. Knowledge helps.

That said, and that was the really important part for everyone, let’s turn back to that WYD issue about excommunication and abortion.

The 1983 Code of Canon Law for the Latin Church states in can. 1398 that there is a sanction, a penalty, a censure imposed on people who participate in the procuring of an abortion. Censures are intended to help people understand the spiritual danger they are in and seek a remedy, and also in the case of publicly known situations let other people know that there is something gravely wrong with the behavior that incurred the censure.

Excommunication is a censure that means a person cannot receive the sacraments, any sacrament, until there is reconciliation and a lifting of the excommunication by the ecclesiastical authority of the proper level. The person also cannot hold any ecclesial office while under such a censure. Some censures can be absolved by diocesan bishops or their delegates, some are reserved to the Holy See and must be absolved by the Holy Father, the Apostolic Penitentiary, or a confessor to whom the faculty to lift the censure has been given. Once the excommunication is absolved, then the person can also receive absolution for the sin which incurred the excommunication and any other sins besides.

There are those cases when the sin and the censure are not public knowledge (they are “occult” in the sense that they are not widely known and have not been formally declared) when a confessor (and by “confessor” I mean a priest who has faculties to receive sacramental confessions) can absolve a person from a censure for a period of time, while placing that person under the strict obligation to seek reconciliation from the proper authority, such as the local bishop or the Holy See. If the person doesn’t seek reconciliation in the given length of time, 30 days, then he once again falls under the censure. An example of this might be the case of a priest who does something to incur a censure which is not public knowledge or declared. However, he cannot fulfill his duties while the censure is in force.  Furthermore, scandal must be avoided, Masses must be said, confessions heard, people married, buried and baptized, etc. Therefore he can receive absolution from a confessor and fulfill his duties, but under the strict obligation to seek fuller reconciliation from the proper authority, such as the local bishop or the Holy See. In that case, the confessor and penitent priest would have an appointment set up for the near future and the confessor could then seek from the proper authority the faculty to lift the censure the next time the penitent priest returned.  The same could be applied, say to a lay man, say, a seminarian facing ordination.  It may be that many years in the past he did something that incurred a censure that has never been lifted.  He learns about this in canon law class and seeks a confessor who can lift the censure so that when he is validly ordained he would not be actually suspended a divinis from the moment of his ordination.  The ordination would be valid, but illicit because the ordinand was irregular for Holy Orders, but not irregular in a way that made the ordination invalid.  Even if no one else knew about any of this, he would know and that would scorch him from within and taint his priesthood until he was reconciled properly.

To incur an excommunication a person must be 16 years or older, aware of the gravely sinful nature of the action, aware that it incurs the censure, have the use of reason and must be acting with unimpaired free will. If a person is in state of fear or is mentally disturbed, if a person is being coerced, or is otherwise not able to exercise free will, he or she does not incur the censure.

That said, abortion is a crime/sin which incurs automatic excommunication if there are not mitigating factors. It can be hard to determine in some case the level of a person’s participation in the sin of another, but certainly the medical personnel who perform the abortion and those supplying the means and money for it, and who counseled it or provoked it would fall into that category.  If the mother herself knows it is wrong, knows there is a censure and does it anyway from free will, even if she is a little afraid, she incurs the excommunication.  A woman who is terrified, truly fearful, perhaps bullied by an angry husband, parent, boyfriend, does not incur it because her freedom is compromised.

If you are worried about yourself, seek a confessor right away and lay out the whole story, even it is painful or embarrassing.  Priests maintain the secrets of confession. They do not break the Seal of Confession.   What you say there, stays there and will not be revealed to any one on earth unless you permit it.  Even with your permission the priest will be reluctant and probably won’t say anything.  And this is something I have noted even among the most goofy liberal priests: even they protect and maintain the Seal of Confession.

It could be that the priests of a diocese, your diocese, have been granted the faculty to absolve the censure of excommunication incurred by participation in an abortion.  In most places these days that is the case for priests in their own dioceses.  This is why the bishop in Spain where WYD is gave the faculty to absolve the censure of excommunication to all the visiting priests as well as his own priests.  It may be that the priest you talk to will have to seek the faculty or that he will tell you that you must seek the bishop.  But in most cases, a priest in his own diocese will probably be able to absolve the censure.

No matter what he tells you in regard to getting that censure lifted, no matter how hard it might seem or embarrassing at the moment, it will be worth it.

If you are excommunicated you may not receive the sacraments, including the sacrament of penance. You must get that censure lifted.

NEVER NEVER NEVER omit confessing a mortal sin which you do in fact remember and know that you haven’t yet confessed. If you purposely omit confessing a mortal sin, you do not receive valid absolution or the graces of the sacrament. Just DON’T DO THAT. Always confess everything in both kind (what the sin is) and number (how many times).

If you were involved directly and in an active way in the procuring of an abortion, and if you have not confessed that to a priest confessor with the faculty to lift the excommunication or to a bishop, then you have an important task to do, as soon as you can. If you are worried about whether or not you incurred an excommunication or you were properly absolved, seek out a sound, knowledgeable confessor very soon. Don’t delay. Make a place in your oh-so-busy schedule for this soul-saving heart-healing matter.

In most places these days, at least in the USA, priests have been given by their bishops the faculty to lift the excommunication resulting from abortion.

No earthly pursuit is as important as your eternal salvation and your peace of mind.

Email isn’t really a good way to deal with these issues, friends. Most people’s situations are both very personal and also usually involve circumstances that cannot easily be related in writing because of the privacy of others.

You need a conversation with a good, knowledgeable priest confessor who can either put you at your ease or put you back on course.

Again, what follows is the most important thing I could ever write on this blog.

There is no sin we little people can commit that cannot be forgiven provided that we are truly sorry for it and ask God’s forgiveness through His priests and are willing to amend our lives.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, Emanations from Penumbras, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , , , ,
23 Comments

Prayer before connecting to the internet – UPDATE! – New language

A long time ago now, I wrote a prayer for people to use before they got online and used the internet. Originally in Latin, it has been translated into many languages (sometimes more than once).

I often forget to pray before using the internet. I often fail in charity when using it. This tool of social communication and research and entertainment has amazing upsides and spiritually deadly perils. We all should be very careful in how we use it – and through – use each other, “use” in the finer sense of “treat”.

It has been a while since I have received a new language version (I think the last was Hungarian). Today I found a new one in my email box.

SLOVENIAN!

Molitev pred prijavo na internet:
Vsemogočni in večni Bog,
ki nas je ustvaril v tvoje slike
in ukazal, naj nam da iščejo po tem, ko vse, kar je dobro, resnično in lepo, še posebej v božanski osebi Vaš edinorojenega Sina, našega Gospoda Jezusa Kristusa, dodelitvi sredstev, smo Vaši, prosim, da, na priprošnjo sveti Izidor, škof in dokter, v času našega potovanja prek interneta bomo neposredno naše roke in oči, samo tisti, ki je prijeten za tebe
in zdravljenje z ljubeznijo in potrpežljivostjo vse tiste duše, katere smo naleteli.
Po Kristusu, našem Gospodu. Amen.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
4 Comments

QUAERITUR: Are SSPX confirmation valid?

From a reader:

I was confirmed by His Excellency Bishop Tissier de Mallerais. He belongs to the SSPX, and I was reading that my confirmation was valid but illicit. Should I get confirmed again. (If I get a disposition from the bishop of ___) I know this has been done before by many SSPX converts to the ICKSP in my parish.

Confirmation, like baptism, cannot be repeated.  If the SSPX confirmation was valid, and it was, then it cannot be repeated.  If there are cases of doubt, then confirmation would be conferred conditionally.  But I don’t think that is necessary in your case.

SSPX bishops are really bishops.  They validly confirm, even though they have no permission from the Church to do so.  That said, I don’t believe that the SSPX priests could validly confirm, since there is no one with any ecclesial authority who could give them a delegation… unless they got it from the local bishop.  Hard to imagine that.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
32 Comments

Reading certain things in certain places

The great Laudator has a fun entry today about the best places in which to read certain authors.

I resonate mightily with this a amusing post, since I have fond memories of a summer sitting in the sun reading 19th c. English novels for a course for my minor, of going to famous places in Italy and reading Latin texts with Fr. Foster, such as the poem about the Fons Bandusiae at Horace’s villa… with bottles of white wine chilling the very spring, of reading Patrick O’Brian while crewing a boat in the North Atlantic, Edward Rutherford’s London in London, Dante’s Inferno in Monteriggioni and other parts of Tuscany.

One could have a lot of fun with this.

Here’s the Laudator and his guest contributor:

In Part XII of The Anatomy of Bibliomania (1931; rpt. New York: Avenel Books, 1981), Holbrook Jackson asks and answers the question How Bookmen Conquer Time and Place. Topics include Of Reading Places (section II, pp. 236-239) and The Association of Book and Place (section III, pp. 239-241).

D.B.Wyndham Lewis, On Straw and Other Conceits (1927; rpt. Hartford: Edwin Valentine Mitchell; New York, Coward-McCann Incorporated [1929]), pp. 30-32, has some thoughts on this question:

It is evident that to extract the essential soul and flavour of certain books one should endeavour to read them in the exact surroundings in which they were conceived, or in surroundings as nearly similar as may be; for the clear air, the sky, the water are, as it were, mixed with the writer’s mind and woven into the very stuff of his imaginings. But whereas there are plenty of books pointing out What To Read and Why To Read, there is as yet, I think, no guide showing Where To Read. I have therefore drawn up from my own experience, haphazard, a modest and sketchy list which may serve as the foundation for such a Guide, though it clearly touches only the edge of the fringe of a vast and absorbing subject.

SHAKESPEARE. One would naturally read Shakespeare in a Warwickshire meadow in buttercup time; or else in the Fitzalan Chapel at Arundel.

RONSARD. To derive the greatest solace from the poetry of Ronsard one must read him lying on the banks of the Loire, at about sunset of a June evening, upon the grass, with a flask of the wine of Vouvray, or Chinon, or Bourgueil at hand; and with the soft air and the murmur of flowing water there should be mixed the gracious voices of girls.

Some demand, in addition, a lute, and a distant voice singing “Bonjour mon coeur, bonjour ma douce vie,” the words by Ronsard, the music by Orlando de Lassus.This seems (as Samuel Butler said about dumb-bells — see above) academic.

KIPLING (MR.). The works of this famous author are most profitably read in the Crystal Palace on Empire Day, during a massed Brass Band Contest; if that can be arranged.

CONGREVE naturally demands to be read in the Sunken Garden at Hampton Court, on the William-and-Mary side of the palace — not the Cardinal’s.

HERRICK should be read in a Devon lane in the time of violets.

TCHEHOV. To extract the best from this author and his English imitators, their work should be read in a dimly lighted dissecting-room; the corpse rather damp and the surgeon and his assistants rather sick of it, in a moody, gaga sort of way.

RABELAIS must be read among the rich lands of the Chionnais in Touraine, on the edge of a white road with cornfields and vineyards on either side. But let there be a farmyard near, with a ripe and aromatic muck-heap in it, the scent of which must be borne to you on the wind; and let there be also loud bursts of rustic laughter and a bottle of Chinon.

One could swell the list indefinitely, in many cases with two, three, or four alternatives each. There is one English man of letters, for example, who holds stoutly that the only place to read the Bucolics of Vergil is at a café-table opposite the Bourse in Paris, when the money-grubbers are howling their damnedest. My own theory is that the Bucolics are best read in the barber’s parlour at the Cosmopole, with a menial squirting costly unguents on the hair and the Rich all round one being polished and trimmed. Again, most of the modern “analytical” novelists need nothing better than a room filled with stale tobacco-smoke: but what kind of room? And again, there may be a law against reading Mr. M******* M***’s prose in the Elephant House at the Zoo.M.M. is probably John Middleton Murry.

Fun, no?  I am sure you could come up with some of your own, real or imagined.

Your own Kindle, and a thermos of Mystic Monk Coffee or Tea could make this a lot easier, too, though the aesthetic of the book is hardly to be discounted.  And so many good things to read are available for free through the Kindle, classics of poetry and novels.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Lighter fare | Tagged , , ,
33 Comments