Archdiocese of Milwaukee files for bankruptcy

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports that the Archdiocese of Milwaukee is to file for bankruptcy.

Part of the story… read the rest there.   My emphases.

Archdiocese filing for bankruptcy

The Catholic Archdiocese of Milwaukee, which is facing more than a dozen lawsuits over its handling of clergy sex abuse cases, is expected to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection this afternoon, the archdiocese said Tuesday.

Archbishop Jerome Listecki said the move was necessary to fairly compensate victims and continue the “essential ministries” of the church, and urged the faithful not to blame the victims.

“For those of you who may feel anger and resentment that we have come to this moment, STOP,” Listecki said in a letter to church members on Tuesday. “We are here because of one reason: Priests sexually abused minors.”

Jeff Anderson, [You could smell that name ahead of time, I’m sure.] the Minnesota lawyer who represents victims in the Milwaukee cases, called the action sad and alarming, characterizing it as a ploy to delay the lawsuits and the disclosure of damning information in depositions of retired Archbishop Rembert Weakland and Richard Sklba. [Gifts which keep on giving.] Sklba’s deposition was initially scheduled for January and recently rescheduled for February.

“The bankruptcy essentially stops the cases from moving forward,” Anderson said. “In other cities it’s often been done on the eve of trial. In this case it’s on the eve of the deposition.”

[…]

How very sad.

Posted in Clerical Sexual Abuse, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , ,
16 Comments

Possible miracle attributed to Ven. John Paul II

From the blog of the intrepid Andrea Tornielli comes this note about the possible approval of a miraculous healing through the intercession of Ven. John Paul II:

In Il Giornale today there was published the news of the upcoming apporoval, on the part of the “medical team” of the Congregaton of the Causes of Saints, of a miracle attributed to the intercession of John Paul II, the healing of a French sister with Parkinson’s.

In additon to approval by the medical specialists, the dossier on the miracle (positio super miro), was also approved by the theologians before the end of 2010.  In these last days the folder describing the healing came to the cardinals and bishops called to give their final judgment before it is presente to Benedict XVI.

The plenary meeeting of cardinals is foreseen for the middle of this month.  If they also, as is foreseeable, approve the positio on the miracle, Angelo Card. Amato, Prefect of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, could go to the Pope to ask him for the promulgation of the decree for the recognition of the miracle.  As you may remember, Benedict XVI on 19 December 2009, already approved the heroic virtues of John Paul II.  At that point, the beatification of Papa Wojtyla will be only a question of the date.. It is still possible that this would happen next summer, or it could even be in October.?

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged , ,
22 Comments

Video interview with Card. Burke

A video interview with Raymond Card. Burke from gloria.tv.

He speaks about speaking about abortion in the public square, about the Extraordinary Form, Communion in the hand, and the “pro multis” issue.  He mentions “mutual enrichment” and “reform of the reform”.

It is about 20 minutes in length.

You can tell that His Eminence’s mind is working partly in Italian, with phrases such as “make a discourse”.

This is a great interview.  Listen carefully.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , ,
12 Comments

QUAERITUR: altar candles… what can they be made from?

candlesFrom a seminarian:

It is becoming increasingly popular to use those fake candles with replaceable oil. Even the side-altars in St. Peter’s use these, and as we know, there are many priests who daily celebrate private Masses in the EF at those altars. I was under the impression the real candles with a certain percentage of real beeswax were specified.

This isn’t just about being fussy.  It is good to pay attention to candles.

Candles are interesting things.  They do more than simply shed light or, in this age of electricity, create an ambiance.  They, like we do, breathe in air.  They move.  They eat.  They die.  We use them as a sacrificial offering, for once they are used, they are gone for good.  They stand in our place when we have intentions to pray for.  We light them to avert storms.  They remind us that, in this dark fallen world, the light of Christ will be victorious.

It seems to me that Summorum Pontificum did not automatically revive all the pre-Conciliar legislation and decrees for the rubrics and things used for Mass and other rites.  That said, there is an interior logic to the way things were done before.  It seems like a good idea to follow those ways as closely as possible when we are dealing with the Extraordinary Form.

At the same time, not ever place where the Extraordinary Form is used is exclusively for the Extraordinary Form.  That being the case, there must be for the time being some flexibility about what we do.  There are bound to be some accommodations to the way things are set up for the Ordinary Form.

For example, if there is one altar cloth being used on a parish altar that is also used for the older form of Mass, given the fact that there are often time restrictions and less than adequate labor available, it doesn’t seem reasonable to require a re-clothing of the altar every time.  The logical solution would be to have the altar permanently clothed for the older form.  That sounds to me like a healthy and reasonable approach.  First, our forebears figured out the best and most practical way to do things.  The number of cloths have a purpose: if there is a spill of the Precious Blood, three cloths will effectively contain the spill whereas one probably will not.

Similarly, it could be too hard to switch all the candles before celebrations of a TLM.  So, we forge ahead hoping that, perhaps, the choice will be made to adjust the present use according to our tradition.  That said, if it is not possible to have better candles, I suppose we just have to sigh and move forward, keeping our hod and trowel close at hand.

Here is something that was posted by a commenter here some time ago on the question of candles.

This is more about candles than you may want to know!

Fr. John Bolen, “The Wax Candle in the Liturgy,” The Ecclesiastical Review, May 1942, 376-383 makes some distinctions.

The 1904 decree stated that the Paschal Candle, the candles used in the blessing of baptismal water, and the two candles needed for the celebration of Mass, must be made of wax, at least “in maxima parte”; all other candles used on the altar must contain a “greater or notable part of wax.” Bolan reports that “In maxima parte” was interpreted as low as 65%, “greater part” meant 51%, and “notable part” was interpreted as low as 25%.

More recently, a guidelines – I don’t think a law – from the U.S. bishops in the USCCB’s Built of Living Stones (2000), n. 93:

Candles for liturgical use should be made of a material that provides “a living flame without being smoky or noxious.” To safeguard “authenticity and the full symbolism of light,” electric lights as a substitute for candles are not permitted. [The footnote is the Notitiae text quoted elsewhere.]

Also at n. 94:

“Above all, the paschal candle should be a genuine candle, the pre-eminent symbol of the light of Christ.

About the sanctuary lamp before the Blessed Sacrament look in “Holy Communion and Worship of the Eucharist Outside Mass” (1973) in the General Introduction, n. 11:

As an indication of Christ’s presence and as a mark of reverence, a special lamp should burn continuously before a tabernacle in which the Eucharist is reserved. According to traditional usage, the lamp should, if at all possible, be an oil lamp or a lamp with a wax candle. [The footnote refers to Congregation of Rites, Instruction Eucharisticum mysterium, n. 57.]

That said, in 1974 the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments answer a question about candles in Notitiae (10:80 (1974), no. 4):

“Query: Must the lighted candles that are to be placed in candlesticks for the celebration of Mass consist in part of beeswax, olive oil, or other vegetable oil?

Reply: The GIRM prescribes candles for Mass ‘as a sign of reverence and festiveness’ (nos. 79, 269). But it makes no further determination regarding the material of their composition, except in the case of the sanctuary lamp, the fuel for which must be oil or wax (see Holy Communion and Worship of the Eucharist Outside Mass, Introduction no. 11). The faculty that the conferences of bishops possess to choose suitable materials for sacred furnishings applies therefore to the candles for Mass. The faculty is limited only by the condition that in the estimation of the people the materials are valued and worthy and that they are appropriate for sacred use. Candles intended for liturgical use should be made of material that can provide a living flame without being smoky or noxious and that does not stain the altar cloths or coverings. Electric bulbs are banned in the interest of safeguarding authenticity and the full symbolism of light.”

In the GIRM (2002) at n. 316:

In accordance with traditional custom, near the tabernacle a special lamp, fueled by oil or wax, should be kept alight to indicate and honor the presence of Christ.

So, there is quite a bit of flexibility about the material of the candles, but the vector of the Church’s thought is pretty clear.  Candles should be of a material that is for the most part natural.  A high percentage real bee’s wax is preferred, always remember that 100% bees wax candles can get a little droopy in hot weather.  They should produce a good flame without guttering.  Tallow or animal fat is too smokey and smells bad.  Vegetable oil, especially olive oil is permitted.

Finally, as a personal note, nothing makes a church smell “Catholic” more than the lingering scent of incense, some wood polish, and bee’s wax candles burning.  That combination alone is just about enough to get you thinking about converting or going to confession or saying the Rosary … you know… doing something Catholic.

Maybe some readers have more.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
21 Comments

Canonist Ed Peters about Bp. Hubbard and on Gov. Cuomo receiving Communion

This is a commentary by the distinguished canonist Ed Peters about the public perception of New York’s new governor, Andrew Cuomo.

Cuomo’s concubinage and holy Communion

Andrew Cuomo, governor of New York, and Sandra Lee, a television celebrity, live in what is known technically as public concubinage. The fact that both Cuomo and Lee are divorced renders the concubinage adulterous on both sides as well.

Under Decretal law, concubinage among laity was a crime that, if not foresworn after three warnings, could result in the excommunication of the offender(s). Taunton, The Law of the Church (1906) at 226. Under Pio-Benedictine law, lay concubinage was a crime that, upon conviction, could result in “exclusion from ecclesiastical acts”, something less than interdict (itself one step shy of excommunication). 1917 CIC 2357 § 2. Finally, under the Johanno-Pauline Code, concubinage among lay persons is not criminalized, though it can have some effects under marriage law which are not relevant to this case. 1983 CIC 1093.

But, notwithstanding the steady canonical “decriminalization” of concubinage (basically for the same kinds of reasons that led to adultery being decriminalized in most states), [This gets to the meat of it…] the lifestyle adopted by Cuomo and Lee continues to have—or should have—serious consequences under Canon 915 for the reception of holy Communion. [The canon which applies also in the case of public scandal in the matter of support for abortion.]

Cuomo, on the grounds of his public concubinage alone (and setting aside complications arising from his strong support for legalized abortion, etc.), should not approach Communion per Canon 916; if he does approach, he should be refused the sacrament per Canon 915. Cuomo should still attend Mass, of course (c. 1247), and within one year of his last Confession he should duly receive that sacrament again (c. 989), but he should not be taking Communion while he lives in public concubinage. And if Lee is Catholic, the exact same analysis would apply to her.

It is Albany Bp. Howard Hubbard’s responsibility to see to it that the common discipline of the Church is promoted and that all ecclesiastical laws are observed, exercising particular vigilance against abuse of the sacraments and the worship of God. 1983 CIC 392.

Unfortunately, Hubbard’s rah-rah inaugurational homily before Cuomo and Lee, in which, without admonition for their objectively and publicly sinful status, the prelate seemed to have anointed the pair as his kind of evangelizers in government, and his complicity in the administration of Communion to Cuomo, amounts, in my opinion, to another dereliction of pastoral duty. + + +

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , , , , ,
27 Comments

Grand Imam in Egypt disagrees with Pope Benedict’s call for respect for Christian lives?

With a biretta tip to Rorate, I note a story on Ahlul Bayat New Agency that… well… read it yourself.

My emphases and comments:

CAIRO (Ahlul Bayt News Agency) – Egypt’s top Muslim cleric on Sunday criticised Pope Benedict XVI’s call for world leaders to defend Christians as interference in his country’s affairs, the official MENA news agency reported.

The call, [from Pope Benedict to respect the lives of Christians…] following a deadly church car-bombing in northern Egypt, was “unacceptable interference in Egypt’s affairs,” Ahmed al-Tayeb, the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, the oldest Islamic seat of learning, told reporters. [This isn’t exactly the Imam at “Ahmed’s corner mosque in Lower Black Duck”, is it.] “I disagree with the pope’s view, [that Christians have the right to be alive…?] and [This is great….] I ask why did the pope not call for the protection of Muslims when they were subjected to killings in Iraq?” he said at a news conference. [Ummmm…  First, they weren’t being killed because they were muslims.  Second, Pope’s asked for peace and respect for human life, there and everywhere.] Benedict at a New Year’s Mass at the Vatican appealed for the “concrete and constant engagement of leaders of nations” to protect Christians in the Middle East, in what he termed a “difficult mission.” In the wake of rising tension and “especially discrimination, abuse and religious intolerance which are today striking Christians in particular, I once again launch a pressing appeal not to give in to discouragement and resignation,” he said.

Tayeb, who renewed his condemnation of the New Year’s Eve church bombing which cost 21 lives, said Azhar, the highest institute in Sunni Islam, would form a joint committee with the Coptic Church to resolve disputes between the communities. The committee, which should begin its work in two weeks, will “discuss reasons for deterioration (in Muslim-Copt ties) and propose appropriate solutions,” he said. Tayeb later met with the head of Egypt’s Coptic Church, Pope Shenouda III, at his headquarters in Cairo’s St Mark Cathedral.

Let’s hope something comes from such meetings.

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia, pray for us.

UPDATE 4 Jan 0037 GMT:

On the site of Vatican Radio we read, with my emphases:

The Director of the Holy See’s Press Office, Jesuit Fr. Federico Lombardi renewed the Holy See’s commitment to authentic religious liberty as the essential element in the search for true peace.

He was responding to remarks from the chief imam of Al-Azhar in Egypt, who on Sunday condemned the deadly New Year’s attack on Coptic Christians emerging from church in Alexandria, but criticised the appeal by Benedict XVI to Egypt’s leaders to counter the persecution of Christians, as an “interference” in internal Egyptian affairs.

In his note, Fr. Lombardi notes both the Imam’s condemnation of the attack, and his personal visit to the Coptic Pope to offer his condolences, before going on to reiterate the position of the Holy Father and the Holy See.

In the note, Fr. Lombardi says that Pope Benedict XVI’s position is very clear, and always has been: a radical condemnation of violence, closeness to the community that has been so horribly stricken, and concern for the religious freedom of Christian minorities. As he said in his Peace Day Message, the Pope’s concern for the religious freedom of Christians has always been within the context of his concern for the religious freedom of all people, not only Christians.

Time and again, the Pope has condemned violence against all people – not only that, which is perpetrated against Christians. We recall his recent discourse to the new Ambassador to the Holy See from Iraq, in which the Holy Father spoke of the innocent victims of violence, both Muslim and Christian.

Right now, we need the commitment of all those responsible for the safety of peoples and the fight against terrorism; we also need all those from all faiths, from every persuasion, who work for peace, to commit themselves to opposing a foul plan that evidently aims to divide, to arouse tension, hatred and conflict. The Pope’s invitation to Assisi for this coming October demonstrates his desire to repeat the message that no war may be waged in God’s name, but only peace. Between the 6th and the 7th of January, Coptic Christians celebrate Christmas. Let us unite ourselves to them in profound solidarity with their suffering and with prayers for the peace of all their communities.

Posted in Modern Martyrs | Tagged , ,
45 Comments

QUAERITUR: Why do deacons distribute Communion? Are they just glorified EMHC’s?

deaconsFrom a reader:

What makes a Deacon an “ordinary” minister of the Eucharist?

Is it simply that he is ordained? I tried to ask our local Deacon, and
was expecting a more theological treatment, but maybe I was expecting too much. I wanted to be able to explain to our entourage of EMHC’s that what they did was different than what the Deacon does/represents.

Why isn’t the Deacon simply a glorified EMHC with a title?

Sadly, many permanent deacons I have known in times past were little more than glorified EMHC’s (Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion) because they were lacking in good theological preparation before ordination.  I am glad to hear far and wide that programs of formation for the permanent diaconate are being overhauled and vastly improved.

That said, a deacon is an ordinary minister of Communion, not merely an Extraordinary Minister of Communion, because of their ordination.  Diaconate, after all, is a step of Holy Orders, which conforms their souls for the tasks to which Holy Church sets them.

We make a distinction between Ministers of the Eucharist and of Communion.  The former confect the Eucharist.  The latter distribute the Eucharist.   Deacons don’t confect the Eucharist.  Cf. Redemptionis Sacramentum 154.

This has roots, of course, in Scripture.

Whereas it is hard in to decipher the difference in Scripture between priests and bishops, it is pretty clear that deacons were something else.   They were ordained to assist or serve the priesthood in concrete ways.  The very word “deacon” comes from the Greek word for “servant”.    In Acts 6 we get the story of how the Apostles, obviously overwhelmed with tasks, needed help so that people, for example, widows, in need of works of mercy were not neglected.   In order to bee freer for prayer and the ministry of the word, the Apostles chose men to assist them.

Their earliest duties would have extended to distribution of food, probably during the earliest Eucharistic contexts.  We have a pretty clear idea that deacons distributed the Eucharist Itself in the first centuries, because at the Council of Nicea it was debated whether or not they should be allowed to do so.  Nevertheless, they retained a special relationship with the sacred vessels, and were allowed to touch them even though their hands were not consecrated.  This probably harks to the distribution of food and goods, as well as the Eucharist.  Some say that they are particularly conformed to see to the “kingly” dimension of the three-fold ministry of Priest, Prophet and King, which the Church receives from Christ, who is all three perfectly.  The kingly office would pertain especially to the administration of goods, which clearly flows from their earliest purpose in the minds of the Apostles.  That involves concrete tasks such as distribution of something tangible, even as the Eucharist at Communion is tangible, consumable.

Also, consider that the Church’s legislation concerning EMHC’s indicates that, in most circumstances, they probably shouldn’t be their at all.  Make it clear – delicately – they don’t have a right to do what they do and not to get their back up if they aren’t called upon to do it.  This isn’t a way to “get lay people involved in active participation”.  EMHCs, even those deputed for a time, have only an ad hoc role, a temporary deputation, a momentary task depending on circumstances and the will of the priest.  Deacons have a stable task for the Church, not just for the moment.  True, they will usually and properly give way in the presence of other priests, but, nevertheless, when deacons are present they should be the first to fill the role the Church designates for them, namely to proclaim the Gospel in liturgical worship, assist with the sacred vessels and distributed the Eucharist.  Occasionally also to preach (though my heart still shudders at what I have in the past heard for a few… but I digress).

“But Father! But Father!”, I can hear the Reverend Messers exclaiming out there. “What about…? … And what about…? And then there’s this…!  And!!! ….”    They are nearly elbowing me off my own keyboard as I type, so eager they are to get in here.

I will let them, since it is part of their ministry to assist and serve, they can assist and serve in this thread and serve out the very best of their insights as food for thought and soul.

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
58 Comments

“The ground was one circle of solid red.”

It is past the season, but this is fine indeed, and it matches something of my mood and my To Do List.

Via the Laudator:

Robert Frost, Unharvested:

A scent of ripeness from over a wall.
And come to leave the routine road
And look for what had made me stall,
There sure enough was an apple tree
That had eased itself of its summer load,
And of all but its trivial foliage free,
Now breathed as light as a lady’s fan.
For there there had been an apple fall
As complete as the apple had given man.
The ground was one circle of solid red.

May something go always unharvested!
May much stay out of our stated plan,
Apples or something forgotten and left,
So smelling their sweetness would be no theft.

Posted in Poetry | Tagged
3 Comments

Blogs You Might Consider

I like bloggers who work and play well with other bloggers. Some don’t, you know. Some bloggers think that others bloggers are competition. I think we can all help each other out.

Here are three who have lately caught my eye.

For your consideration.

  • Catholic Fiction: Responding to Myths & Half-Truth is run by a young man with zeal. He is into apologetics and has quite the grip on web development and social
    networking.  He also adds this blog’s new entries to his Twitter feed!  I appreciate that!
  • Ex Fide is the blog of another young man, an Anglo-Catholic and the sacristan of the beautiful (quite high) Anglican Church St. Magnus Martyr in the City (for people in Rio Linda, that’s in London, which is in England, a whole other country).  I am particularly glad to add this blog, because of the link between the church, which I have visited and posted on here, and a favorite poet of mine T.S. Eliot.  The blogger says, “I have a particular interest in the liturgy and devotions of the Church.”
  • The Crescat… what does one say?  Her not quite comprehensible blog title does invite a little head scratching.  She has a mordant sense of humor and great openness about her personal travails, be it marriage and dating or, on the other hand, her admiration for real women religious.  Her “DISCLAIMER: Any resemblance to sanity or rational thought on this blog is purely intentional, though may be highly incomprehensible.”  She also has some useful contests including Ugliest Vestment, Tacky Catholic Kitsch Award, Ugliest Church Art Contest, “Is it a Catholic Church or a Prison” Contest, Bad Art Makes Baby Jesus Cry, and Every tacky nativity scene every created.

Go spike their stats and enjoy.

Posted in Blogs You Might Consider |
Comments Off on Blogs You Might Consider

Serviams’ 2010 CINO Award winner surges to victory

Serviam’s 2010 CINO Award winner surges to victory

“Congratulations” to the National catholic Reporter on winning the 2010 CINO Award.  It was a closer vote than in years past with NcR edging out Nancy Pelosi by only 115 votes out of more than 1600 cast.

Go to SERVIAM and check out the entry.

Posted in Linking Back, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
5 Comments