Abandon all hope, ye (criminals) who enter here!

From a reader (and regular commentator) in Wisconsin:

 

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
43 Comments

QUAERITUR: Eucharistic fast… AFTER Communion? Wherein Fr. Z rants.

From a reader:

I heard recently that there is a rule that after receiving Holy Communion, a person should not eat for fifteen minutes (I think because that’s how long the Body of Christ is in us after Communion).

Most of the time, this wouldn’t pose an issue because with the prayers after Communion and after Mass it would be longer than 15 minutes after Communion before people even get out of the church. But at my college ___ we have Daily Mass before lunch. The Mass is very quick, and I believe that many times Mass gets out and people go and get lunch before the fifteen-minute period after Communion is over. Is there actually such a 15-minute rule? If there is, I’d like to spread the word around my campus to make sure people aren’t breaking their fasts!

There is a law, risible as it may be, applicable to most people to fast for one hour before reception of Holy Communion.  I say most people, because sometimes there are special circumstances and I risible because an hour is… simply put… not enough, in my humble opinion.  But it is the law of the Latin Church.  Also, the one hour is before reception of Communion and not, as some people mistakenly think, before the beginning of Mass.  Some Masses are long enough that you could be eating your pork and beans on the way up the stairs of the church and still be okay for reception of Communion.

There is no law concerning fasting after reception of Communion.

There is, however, a rule of thumb.

It is usually suggested that you allow at least 15 minutes to pass before taking food.

The reason for this is grounded in our belief that, after the consecration, as long as the accidents of bread remain, then the Eucharistic Christ is truly present.  Once the substance is broken, and we can no longer discern the accidents of what was bread, then Christ is no longer sacramentally present.  It probably takes about 15 minutes – on the safe side – for the Host to be changed in the process of swallowing and digestion to the point where it is no longer the Eucharist.

If we truly believe what we say we believe about the Eucharist, doesn’t it seem right to stay and pray a bit even after Mass and say “Thank you!” to our Lord?

So, the good rule of thumb is about 15 minutes.  And it turns out that in some parishes there are enough announcements and other blabblab that 15 minutes are eaten up, if you’ll pardon the pun.

Friends, we should cultivate the practice, and set a good example for others, by remaining in church in prayer of thanksgiving after Holy Mass concludes.  Fathers!  Bishops! You should talk about this as well!

Let us promote reverent silence for prayer after Mass! Rise up against the profaning of our churches by kneeling down in silent and prayerful thanksgiving!

Unite!  Promote the new evangelization!  Reclaim the sacred spaces of our churches!

Take our churches back from jabbering cretins who fill the air after Mass with their relentlessly mundane GABBLE!!!

ehem

No, there is no law.  But it is a good thing to remember after Mass on your way to the doughnut line.

Here is a prayer that you could learn and recite after Holy Mass during which you dared to receive Communion:

A Prayer For After Mass

I give thanks to Thee, O Lord, most holy, Father almighty, eternal God, that Thou hast vouchsafed, for no merit of mine own, but out of Thy pure mercy, to appease the hunger of my soul with the precious body and blood of Thy Son, Our Lord Jesus Christ. Humbly I implore Thee, let not this holy communion be to me an increase of guilt unto my punishment, but an availing plea unto pardon and salvation. Let it be to me the armour of faith and the shield of good will. May it root out from my heart all vice; may it utterly subdue my evil passions and all my unruly desires. May it perfect me in charity and patience; in humility and obedience; and in all other virtues. May it be my sure defence against the snares laid for me by my enemies, visible and invisible. May it restrain and quiet all my evil impulses, and make me ever cleave to Thee Who art the one true God. May I owe to it a happy ending of my life. And do Thou, O heavenly Father, vouchsafe one day to call me, a sinner, to that ineffable banquet, where Thou, together with Thy Son and the Holy Ghost, art to Thy saints true and unfailing light, fullness of content, joy for evermore, gladness without alloy, consummate and everlasting happiness.  Through the same Christ our Lord.  Amen.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged ,
38 Comments

QUAERITUR: Confusion about celebrating parish, patronal feasts

From a reader:

The Parish to which I belong is dedicated to the Patronage of a Saint Gianna Beretta Molla (April 28) and the Parish Church (brick and mortar) is dedicated to Saint Bernadette Soubirous (April 16). Canon Law prohibits changing the name of a church once it is dedicated to a specific saint, etc. However, in the current U.S.A. Ordo, Saint Gianna is not yet listed and St. Bernadette is only mentioned in the Ordo for February 11 (Our Lady of Lourdes) with no option of celebrating her feast on April 16. (Perhaps that is because in 2013 April 16 fell within the Easter Season). If this parish wishes to honor their patronesses on the dates of their feasts what options do they have? I can understand if these dates were on a Sunday, but in the future, may the option for celebrating the Mass for A Holy Woman be used for Saint Gianna and the option for a Religious be used for Saint Bernadette?

You will find at the beginning of the Roman Missal a table of liturgical days (also here).
This should tells us all we need to know.

Regardless of whether a particular saint is on the General Calendar, or the Particular Calendar of a nation or a diocese, if a parish is dedicated to that saint, his or her feast is “on the calendar” for that parish.

A helpful guide is HERE.

Unless 28 April or 16 April fall on a higher-ranked celebration (such as Easter or Ascension), the parish celebrates its titular feast day and the titular feast day of the parish church.  Patronal/titular feasts are ranked as solemnities, but proper solemnities rather than solemnities such as the important feasts of the Lord or Our Blessed Mother and so forth.    So, we should give proper liturgical observance to the patron of the place, the titular patron saint of the church and also the anniversary of the dedication of the church building.

If the pastor wants to transfer the celebration to a Sunday of Ordinary Time, he should consult with the local bishop about the praxis of the diocese. The local diocesan bishop can grant permission (and this is fairly common, I think) to transfer the celebration.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
6 Comments

Ed Peters on “Clerical Slumming” (make popcorn)

The pesky, trouble-making canonist Ed Peters – I am glad he is on the side of the good, the true and beautiful, by the way – over at his site vivisects a priest.

After reading this, I made popcorn and then read it again.

Go over there by clicking HERE.  He doesn’t have an open combox and he doesn’t mind if I post his stuff here, so please go over and spike his stats as a gesture of gratitude.

Clerical slumming

by Dr. Edward Peters

You know what slumming is. It’s where rich kids pretend to be poor and do poor for a spell, knowing it’s all fake for them, of course, and that, when they’re done slumming, they can go home and get a hot shower and have yummy snack and sleep in a clean bed, unlike their slum-buds for whom the poor life is very real and for whom daddy’s dollars aren’t a phone call away and able to make everything alright if they get into trouble.
Well, apparently, there’s a priest who decided to try something similar and pretend that he was an alien trying to get to America. [!] I first heard the story on Univision yesterday but attributed my confusion over it to gaps in my knowledge of Spanish. Now I’m thinking my Spanish was maybe okay; it was the stunt itself that I could not fathom.

Not making this up. [Fact can be weirder than fiction.]

An American priest decided to experience what it’s like to cross the US-Mexico border illegally, you know, so he can talk intelligently about border issues. He lifts $ 3,000 from the parish till (excuse me?), [?!? Niiiiice… huh?  How would you feel if your priest was using the money you put into the Sunday collection to fund his… what is this… hobby?] goes to Mexico, and pays the three grand to coyotajes to lead him to the border (forgetting, I guess that, the North Star points—guess which way?—north, and that one can look at it for free). Anyway, the priest gets to the border, sits down and stares at the iron fence for a couple hours, and then climbs it. No one sees him. After a day of no one noticing a US citizen being in America, the priest turns himself in, provokes a stunning lack of interest in US authorities who release him (I guess American citizens climbing the fence into America must not be a high priority concern for them), and he tells his story to the media. Who treat it as a news story, instead of as a joke.
Per the Chicago Tribune, “The pastor said he believes he is the first Chicago priest to cross the U.S.-Mexico border by climbing a wall.” Well, thank God for that, at least. I mean, how many well-fed, able-bodied American-citizen priests with too-easy access to cash do we need who can pretend to break into their own country, yet can’t get arrested over it for love or money, and who obviously wouldn’t face deportation even if they were arrested, in order to prove that this kind of stunt is pointless?
I would hope, not more than one.

Well done.

I think this is the Univision story here.  Take note of the way this … fellow during his sermon walks around with a microphone as if he were a gameshow host.

UPDATE:

I’ve been pondering this lifting of money from the parish coffers for this project.

Is it possible that Fr. Graf called the diocesan chancery beforehand and said “This is what I plan and how much it will cost!”, and then told the members of the parish – through the parish bulletin and pulpit announcements – what he was up to with the money?

Sure. It’s possible.

Posted in Goat Rodeos, HONORED GUESTS, The Drill | Tagged , , , , ,
45 Comments

Pope Francis, the Devil, and You

The Holy Father, Pope Francis, talks frequently about the Devil.

This is another example of how Francis is, in his preaching, a bit more concrete than Benedict.

During his fervorino for Mass today, Pope Francis spoke about the “prince of this world”.

“We can safeguard the Church, we can cure the Church, no? We do so with our work, but what’s most important is what the Lord does : He is the only One who can look into the face of evil and overcome it. The prince of the world comes but can do nothing against me: if we don’t want the prince of this world to take the Church into his hands, we must entrust it to the One who can defeat the prince of this world. Here the question arises: do we pray for the Church, for the entire Church? For our brothers and sisters whom we do not know, everywhere in the world? It is the Lord’s Church and in our prayer we say to the Lord: Lord, look at your Church … It’ s yours. Your Church is [made up of] our brothers and sisters. This is a prayer that must come from our heart”.

My friends, the Devil is real. Francis sure believes in the Enemy.

Let’s review.

The Devil and the fallen angels hate you.

They have angelic abilities. They never sleep, never tire, are never distracted, have no need to travel from point a to b, and they never miss what you are up to.

Think this through.

Imagine what sort of profile on you some government agency could put together.

Imagine that government agencies wanted to build a psychological profile of you, much as the FBI might when they use clues and evidence to hunt down an unknown serial killer.

So these government agents … just to make this fun, let’s call it The Agency (under Obama’s fourth term), teamed up with his newly minted Domestic Security Force, are profiling Catholics… because they are probably terrorists and dissidents and refuse to worship Moloch and offer sacrifices of incense to the statue of the POTUS.

The Agency and DSF start to plot your movements through your mobile phone as you move in and out of cells which they monitor to triangulate your location.  They learn something about you through your patterns of travel.  They learn about your tastes and interests through your purchasing history.  They monitor your calls, where you go on the internet, what you write and read in your email and on webpages.  They look at all your online transactions. Through your credit card records they hunt up the actual receipts and examine what you bought at every store…  including those embarrassing things.  After all, you leave amazingly information-rich and detailed trails and clues to who you are with every move and purchase.  The Agency and DSF review all your library checkouts, your magazine subscriptions, your movie going habits, your DVD choices through Netflix or digital downloads through iTunes.  They watch your channel selections through your cable or satellite. All this information can be mined.  They watch your every interaction with your friends… and strangers too, for that matter, with listening devices and cameras.  After gathering all this information, the Agency’s profiling experts build a picture of you, get into your head.   They figure out what you are about, who you are, and what you going to do next.

They are merely humans with a lot of bits of information.

How much better can fallen angels, the demons do this?

Angels, the holy angels and the fallen, have missed nothing of your live since the instant of your conception.  And they never forget anything.

Fallen angels, the enemy, the Devil, can’t literally get into our heads or thoughts or touch our will, but they don’t have to in order to know us really well.

And they hate you.   They hate you.  They hate you.

With relentless malice the “prince of this world” will work to trick you into letting him have some control in your life.  Demons will cleverly and with perfect timing stimulate appetites and passions based on how well they know your proclivities.   They strive to twist your heart and mind away from God in order to diminish even by a little the love everyone will share in heaven as they shine in the magnified glory of the Trinity.

The Devil and other demons are always held in check by God.  They cannot simply have their way with us or the material cosmos around us unless God permits it according to His plan.   But they are devious and tireless.

It is good that Pope Francis talks about the Devil, the enemy of our soul, the prince of this world.

Remember your Guardian Angels.  Call on them to help you.  Remember Our Lady, Queen of Angels.  Remember St. Joseph, whom we invoke in his beautiful litany as the “Terror daemonum… the Terror of demons”.

Examine your consciences and go to confession.

The Sacrament of Penance is a mighty weapon against the demonic agents of Hell.

A good confession can put to flight the dark legion that seeks your downfall.

A good confession prompts the angels and saints to raise joyful praise to God in their longing for you someday to be happy with them in heaven.

UPDATE 18:31 GMT:

The nice people at Catholic News Service sent an email to alert me to this video.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Francis, GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
16 Comments

What homosexual “marriage” advocates are really after

This was sent by an alert reader.

From the site of the Illinois Family Institute earlier in April comes this.

Homosexual Activist Admits True Purpose of Battle is to Destroy Marriage Written

By Micah Clark | 04.06.13

Even knowing that there are radicals in all movements, doesn’t lessen the startling admission recently by lesbian journalist Masha Gessen. On a radio show she actually admits that homosexual activists are lying about their radical political agenda. She says that they don’t want to access the institution of marriage; they want to radically redefine and eventually eliminate it.

Here is what she recently said on a radio interview:

“It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. …(F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie.

The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago.

I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, [Ahhh… aren’t they all just soooo hip? Soooo superior?  That’s what the MSM and entertainment industry would have you think by their portrayal of them.] and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally… I met my new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted son also considers him his father. So the five parents break down into two groups of three… And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.”

(Source HERE)

[…]

Read the rest there.

Remember this when you read something on a dissident site such as the Fishwrap that we need to evolve in our view of same-sex unions or “marriage”.

Posted in Liberals, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
74 Comments

WaPo: Homosexual Episcopal bishop dictates to Catholics what we should believe

I saw in WaPo that the homosexual Episcopalian ex-bishop of New Hampshire is telling Catholics what their doctrine and discipline should be.

This serves as a follow-up to my post about Protestants who deign to determine for Catholics what ordination really is and what Mass really is.  That is to say, when Protestant churches host a women-priest circus, they are either blatantly protesting the Catholic Church concerning her most sacred rites, or they are dictating to the Church what Catholics ought to believe.

So much for ecumenism!

Similarly, the openly homosexual Robinson takes it upon himself to tell Catholics what to do.  We should conform ourselves to his private homosexual life-styles choice.  And if we don’t, we are bad and backward and will lose all our membership in the Church, because, after all, no one believes what white male Catholic prelates say.

If you do read his piece, take note that Robinson thinks that the clerical abuse scandal we Catholics endured – and have pretty much cleaned up – has provided him and everyone else under the sun with carte blanche when it comes to telling Catholics what they ought to believe.   Never mind the fact that Protestants have their own black swamp of child abuse problems.  Oh no!  They get a pass from the media, and from themselves, because they are not Catholic.  And shall we forget Robinson’s colleague in the episcopal episcopate?  The female bishop – subsequently their presiding bishop – who ordained an ex-Catholic whom she knew was accused of child abuse?  HERE

I won’t go into all the details of Robinson’s condescending diatribe, but I will comment on this, from the very first paragraph:

Polling shows that ex-Catholics are the third largest religious group in the United States. Many Catholic laity are experiencing a painful disconnect between the official teachings and pronouncements of the Catholic hierarchy and what they believe in their hearts. It’s no wonder they are voting with their feet.

Two points.

First, even if he is right and fallen-away Catholics are indeed the third-largest religious group, that still makes them a lot bigger than the pro-sodomy, pro-abortion Episcopal Church.

Second, as much as I would like to recover our fallen-away brethren, if they will not embrace their Catholic Faith in its fullness, then they should go join Robinson.  His churches are emptying too.

UPDATE 22:06 GMT:

A reader sent this…

Gene Robinson was elected Bishop of New Hampshire in 2003. This was the dawning of the New Age when “All sorts and conditions of men,” as the Prayer Book would say, would begin flocking to the Episcopal,Church. Especially in New Hampshire…

AVERAGE SUNDAY ATTENDANCE
EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE:
2001 5,289 people attending
2011 4,083 people attending
DECLINE 2001-2011 -23.0%

UPDATE 23:03 GMT:

Ed Peters, the trouble-making academic and canonist, comments on Robinson HERE.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , , ,
67 Comments

YOUR URGENT PRAYER REQUESTS

Please use the sharing buttons!  Thanks!

Registered or not, will you in your charity please take a moment look at the requests and to pray for the people about whom you read?

Continued from THESE.

I get many requests by email asking for prayers. Many requests are heart-achingly grave and urgent.

As long as my blog reaches so many readers in so many places, let’s give each other a hand.  We should support each other in works of mercy.

If you have some prayer requests, feel free to post them below. You have to be registered here to be able to post.

Finally, I have a serious personal petition.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
60 Comments

What is your good news?

Do you have some good news to share with the readers?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
32 Comments

Tensions

I have been thinking a lot about Gregorian chant these days.  As often happens when I am pecking away at a subject, someone sends me a link to something useful.

There is a series of videos on YouTube in French taken from VHS of a course on Gregorian chant by the monks of Solesmes. If you have French, even remotely, you will find them interesting.  They are not the final word and they are dated, but they are helpful.

One thing caught my eye in the video Le chant grégorien à Solesmes (4) : Modes, impacts, Legato.  This inscription is displayed – I assume that it is at Solesmes, if not in the church then in the monastery – while a chant is played as a demonstration of a point that was made.

There is always going to be a tension between the insights of the past and the insights of the present, especially as we learn more and develop and deepen our understanding of an aspect of the Faith.  There is also always a tension in this life between authority (external to us) and one’s own will.  This applies to doctrine, as Bl. John Henry Newman pointed out, and to our liturgical worship, as Pope Benedict XVI so ably underscored.  Bringing these elements into harmony can be the task of a lifetime.  The inscription above provides a good starting point.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , ,
4 Comments