Pope Francis shoots down bishops who want Summorum Pontificum overturned

Recently there was a news item about some Italian bishops griping (that’s not news) to Pope Francis (ditto) about Summorum Pontificum (as before). They think it should be extirpated (more of the same). Francis shot them down. That’s news.

I am having days filled with museums at the moment, and therefore living on my computer is low on my list. However, my friend Fr. Tim Finigan, His Hermeneuticalness, has the low down. Let’s see what clever analysis he offers (my emphases and comments):

The Bishops of the region of Tavoliere met recently with Pope Francis on an ad limina visit. On their return home, one has given a fascinating glimpse of the attitude of Pope Francis to those who are seeking to use the opportunity of his papacy to attack the traditional Mass. This is reported in the Italian paper Il Foglio, in the article: La messa antica non si tocca, il Papa gesuita spiazza ancora tutti (“The old mass is not to be touched, the Jesuit Pope wrong-foots everyone” [spiazza… floors, shocks])

Here is [Fr Finigan’s] translation of the relevant part of the article which tells of other bishops raising concerns with the Holy Father and goes on to speak of the intervention concerning the old Mass:

Then it was the turn of the bishop of Conversano and Monopoli, Domenico Padovano, who recounted to the clergy of his diocese how the priority [what a sad group of men] of the bishops of the region of Tavoliere had been that of explaining to the Pope that the mass in the old rite was creating great divisions within the Church. The underlying message: Summorum Pontificum should be cancelled, or at least strongly limited. But Francis said no.

Mgr Padovano explained that Francis replied to them saying that they should be vigilant over the extremism of certain traditionalist groups but also suggesting that they should treasure tradition and create the necessary conditions so that tradition might be able to live alongside innovation.  [Right.  And we could even have a document that says that!  It could be called… how ’bout… Ecclesia Dei adflicta?  In it the Pope could command by his Apostolic authority that bishops do that.]
This is not really a surprise (did anyone expect that Pope Francis would somehow “repeal” Summorum Pontificum? [Apparently those bishops did.]) but it is a welcome confirmation of what we would all expect.

One thing that jumps out of the story is that the bishops of this region judged that their main pastoral priority – to be communicated to the Pope on a five-yearly visit – was to attack Summorum Pontificum. [“priority”] Forget abortion, embryo experimentation, the push for same-sex marriage throughout Europe, the loss of faith of many Catholics and our failure in catechesis and evangelisation. No, the really big problem is a small number of priests legitimately saying the old Mass. [small but growing, especially as the Biological Solution kicks into gear] Given what Pope Francis has said about the danger of being a self-referential Church, I can well imagine he gave them short shrift.  [Good insight.]

Those bishops fell into the trap of pitting Pope Francis against Pope Benedict.

Francis himself gave us an example of READING FRANCIS THROUGH BENEDICT.

I will now repeat what I wrote after the election of Pope Francis, addressed to those who were unsure about how to proceed giving the new Pope’s different (outward) style.

The tank has only one gear.

If you are feeling down and don’t know what to do, if you are discouraged because Pope Francis is doing different things, remember that Pope Benedict left juridical provisions.

If you don’t know what to do…

… take the training wheels off and RIDE THE DAMN BIKE.

Get something going.  Now is not the time to hesitate.  Press forward.

 

Posted in Benedict XVI, Brick by Brick, Francis, Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Our Catholic Identity, Reading Francis Through Benedict, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , ,
31 Comments

QUAERITUR: Should I serve at the altar if I don’t want to be a priest?

From a reader:

I have been an altar server for several years. However, after a
slowdown two years ago, I have figured out that priestly ordination is
probably not for me. Occasionally, I still serve at an Eastern
Catholic parish, whose pastor likes when I am able to do it. However,
I question if I should really be doing something priestly if it is not
(likely) my vocation?

Sure. I don’t see any reason to stop serving at Holy Mass.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
48 Comments

QUAERITUR: American patriotic stuff in church

From a reader:

Is it permissible to recite the pledge of allegiance at Mass before
the final blessing and then omit the final blessing? Is it permissible
to display the American flag on the main altar during Mass?

Omit the final blessing? NO! Not unless there is a liturgical reason to do so.

But to have the Pledge at that point? Before the blessing? That’s out of place. After Mass would be okay. In the past I have after Mass willingly lead people in a recitation of Archbishop Carroll’s prayer for public figures. When I am in England I have after Mass happily lead a prayer for the Queen.

I believe there is no law for the universal Church that governs the placement of flags in church. Diocesan bishops could issues particular rules for their dioceses. However, if memory serves, flags in the sanctuary itself are discouraged.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
33 Comments

Little careerist!

A lighter moment.

Little careerist!

Posted in Just Too Cool, Lighter fare | Tagged
10 Comments

Of the obligatory bagel

Manhattan is the only place so far where I manage to enjoy bagels. And, here, I enjoy them indeed,

KA, at your request, this one’s for you!

20130527-125851.jpg

It is a spectacular day, and I am in a great spot, perched in the shade on the edge of Bryant Park.

20130527-130017.jpg

Urban parks often disclose moments of bared humanity… and I don’t mean the apricators:

20130527-130208.jpg
I’ll meet a friend for lunch. There is a new Chinese place I want to explore. Let it be open!

I am so grateful that the sacrifices of so many have made such a rich and carefree day possible. My we remember them always.

I passed a plaque on my way to the park which struck home that so many have paid the great price for many years indeed.

20130527-130623.jpg
UPDATE

Lunch!

Crispy cold Sichuan cucumber

20130527-135134.jpg

Stir fried tea tree mushrooms! I smell the peppercorns….

20130527-135509.jpg
Rather like eating delicious shreds of tire.

Live! Learn!

20130527-135936.jpg

20130527-142627.jpg

UPDATE:

20130527-145323.jpg
The first time I’ve had something resembling ice cream since… I can’t remember. Even since the last few times in Rome.

20130527-145439.jpg
Gents play petanque.

Wonderful.

20130527-145553.jpg
And there are other amusements.

20130527-145629.jpg

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
28 Comments

What is your good news?

Please share some of your good news with the readers.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
47 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes

Trinity Sunday can be a tricky moment for a preacher.

Was there a good… I wrote GOOD… point in the sermon you heard for your Sunday Mass?

Let us know what it was.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
51 Comments

The Feeder Feed: packed museum edition

The Metropolitan Museum is jam-packed today, which is to be expected. I limited myself to a brief assault just to see a couple pieces. I did, however, want to share a Christological goldfinch in this painting by Sano di Pietro (+1480). The Sienese like the finches. They also often show little Jesus with some Mom’s veil in his hand.

20130526-153803.jpg
A closer look.

20130526-153840.jpg
I am pretty sure that grasping her veil or cloak is a reference to His having taking our humanity from her.

I also liked this delightful (not quite) still life by Georg Flegel (+1630):

20130526-154130.jpg

20130526-154143.jpg
An early version of: Today I am as happy as a bird with a French fry!

It’s time to get out into the wind and the sun, to find some dappled paths and soughing in the leaves.

20130526-154440.jpg

UPDATE:

A beautiful day in the park.

20130527-104337.jpg

20130527-104349.jpg

20130527-104403.jpg

UPDATE

After supper, I got a lift home from friends. Heading across town on 46th we saw a HUGE nearly full dark yellow moon rising between the buildings across the width if the island.

The photo doesn’t do it justice.

20130527-104722.jpg

20130527-104728.jpg

Posted in On the road, The Feeder Feed, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged
7 Comments

Ahhhh…. ducky!

Duck soup!

Wonderful.

20130526-131838.jpg

20130526-132800.jpg

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged
9 Comments

Liberal survey of priests on new translation is inaccurate

A little while ago, some people who hate on the new translation of the Roman Missal had a little survey of priests and their reception of the translation. It may not come as a huge surprise that the survey found that the majority of priests didn’t like it!

An expert on polls looked at the survey and offered that the results are probably not accurate. The respondents were self-selecting. Therefore, those who responded were those who wanted to vent. Even then, only only 59% didn’t like it, compared with 39% who did like it.

Sheesh! My polls are self-selecting too, but even I get better results than that!

From CNA with my emphases and comments:

Survey on priests’ dislike of Missal may be inaccurate
By Carl Bunderson

Hamden, Conn., May 25, 2013 / 04:03 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- A survey of U.S. priests’ attitudes towards the new English translation of the Roman Missal showing “widespread skepticism” may be inaccurate because of its methods, according to a polling expert.

On May 21, St. John’s School of Theology, located in [liberal]Collegeville, Minn., released its survey results saying that the majority of priests in America dislike the new Missal.

Of the some 1,500 priests who responded to the survey, 39 percent like the new text, and 59 percent dislike it, according to the Collegeville survey.

“All 178 Roman Catholic Latin rite dioceses in the U.S. were invited to take part in this study; 32 dioceses participated…in the period February 21 – May 6, 2013, priests in participating dioceses were invited to participate in the online survey via an email to all priests on the diocesan distribution list,” according to the survey’s executive summary.

Peter Brown, who is assistant director of Quinnipiac University’s Polling Institute, discussed polling procedures with CNA May 23. [NB:]“Random sampling is the key to getting accurate poll results,” he said.

Since only a few dioceses chose to participate in the survey – just under 18 percent – and only some priests in those dioceses chose to respond, survey respondents were “self-selecting.”  [That means that the sample wasn’t representative of priests in the USA.]

“They participated not randomly, but because they were the ones that chose to respond,” Brown explained. “Self-selected samples are not generally thought of….they don’t produce a random sample.”

Since polls rely on a small number of people to represent the attitudes or beliefs of a larger population, “you have to be absolutely sure that the random group is a random group.”

The Collegeville survey, Brown said, “might not meet those criteria” since its participants were self-selecting.

“It’s very difficult to know exactly” in this particular case, he added, though he had noted that self-selecting samples are generally not random.  [Did he mentioned “self-selecting”?]

The survey’s project manager, Chase Becker, is a graduate student in liturgical studies at St. John’s School of Theology, and holds a bachelor’s degree in philosophy. No ostensible polling experts were involved, and the survey’s professional consultant was an associate professor of psychology at the institution. [LOL!]

The poll also had no indication of its margin of error.  [It just get’s better, doesn’t it?]

The survey’s results were welcomed by vocal critics of the new translation, such as Bishop Donald W. Trautman, Erie’s bishop emeritus.  [There’s a shocker.]

[…]

 

You can read the rest of the autopsy over there.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, POLLS, Priests and Priesthood, The Drill, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , ,
23 Comments