REVIEW: Roman Missal from the Catholic Truth Society (UK) – spiffing!

At long last I received my new altar edition of the Roman Missal by the Catholic Truth Society in England. The book was ridiculously held up in customs. I have looked virtually all the new missals. I really like this one. It is an English edition, not an American edition. But that doesn’t make too much difference to me.

There was a story in the Catholic Herald about the making of these missals.

20111122-192817.jpg

Opening the box you find that the book is within a cloth bag, to protect it.

20111122-192827.jpg

The book’s outta da bag.  Beautiful.

Behold the Altar Missal edition.

20111122-192834.jpg

Nice ribbons.

20111122-192841.jpg

Here is a close up of the leather.

20111122-192850.jpg

There is a little bit of padding under the leather of the bind, which gives the book a very nice feel.  The book feels valuable and special and worthy for use at the altar in front of people.

20111122-192900.jpg

20111122-192910.jpg

20111122-192916.jpg

Turning to the inside, there is beautiful art.  The Magnificat edition also has a lot of art, most of it, if memory served, full-page.  I think I like this better.

20111122-192931.jpg

20111122-192938.jpg

20111122-192945.jpg

20111122-192951.jpg

This is what the musical notation looks like.

20111122-192959.jpg

The tabs.

20111122-193006.jpg

In the back there are tones for singing readings.  And some of the readings for some feasts are provided.

20111122-193016.jpg

I was very pleased with this splendid book.  Again, it is a British edition of the Missale Romanum and, therefore, it does not have the adaptations for the USA.  Those don’t enter into play very much, except perhaps on days such as American Thanksgiving Day, for which there is a Mass formulary in the USA.

I am pretty sure that at this late date most of my priest friends have chosen their editions of the new Roman Missal.  However, if someone out there is not certain about what to get, I liked this wonderful volume.  Also, if you are looking for a nice gift for a priest, and you know he doesn’t have his own edition, check this out.

This book, along with some of the other editions I have seen, suggest that the silly season for liturgical books is well and truly over.  If the new CDW “team” for liturgical decorum and ars celebrandi is going to oversee (in some still nebulous way) things destined for sacred use, they are not going to have to worry that this book is unworthy.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, REVIEWS, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , ,
39 Comments

Platitude Cookie Alert!

20111122-115721.jpg

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
21 Comments

Fishwrap promotes a “sermon” by a wywymprystess

The National catholic Reporter quousque tandem?

The Fishwrap brings us today the “sermon” of a woman who thinks she is a priest.  She is a member of the big-puppet crew, the wymynpryst thingie.

Honestly, as I read this I had a suspicion that Fishwrap was engaged in self-parody.  I promise, I am not making this up.  And the caption on the photo, below, is “Janice Sevre-Duszynska prepares for liturgy Nov. 19. (Submitted photo)”.  Really.

My emphases and comments.

How do you welcome strangers?
Nov. 22, 2011
By Janice Sevre-Duszynska

Editor’s Note: The following is the homily preached Nov. 19 by Janice Sevre-Duszynska, ordained a priest [The Editor accepts that she is ordained, it seems.] in the Association of Roman Catholic Women Priests. She and Franciscan Fr. Jerry Zawada led an inclusive Catholic eucharistic liturgy [simulated a Mass?] at the SOA Watch Vigil at Ft. Benning in Columbus, Ga., as part of the Progressive Catholic Coalition. Zawada and Sevre-Duszynska have both served jail time for civil disobedience to protest nuclear weapons and militarism.

First Reading: “Comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable,” in The Eucharist and the Hunger of the World by Monika K. Hellwig.
Second Reading: Ballad of the Carpenter (sung in English, then read in Spanish)
Gospel: Matthew 25: 31-46.
We afflicted the comfortable after showing “Pink Smoke Over the Vatican” for the first time in Rome in October. Following our press conference, our group met at the corner of Via Concilizione, the street leading to the Vatican. We were members of Call to Action, Women’s Ordination Conference, and women priests. We were here to support Roy Bourgeois and women priests. [Remember that great event?  I think there were, what… five people there?]

“What shall we sing?” we asked one another. [I promise… I am not making this up and it seems to be sincere…] I shook my ordination tambourine as the WOC banner was displayed and Roy brought out his red-and-white banner with “Ordain women priests” in English and Italian.  [Ordination Tambourine!   I didn’t get one of those.]

We were chanting the Celtic Alleluia and singing “Here I am, Lord” on our way to the Vatican to present the petition signed by 15,000 supporters of Roy and women priests. We were in Rome to cleanse the Vatican temple of sexism. A church that excludes women distracts us from being aware of the feminine aspect of spirituality and the experience and perceptions of women’s living and dying. The result is we have a church with a distorted understanding of God. The imbalance creates evil, sin and the suffering continues in our world community.

“What do you want? Women priests. When do you want them? Now,” we shouted out.
Roy turned to me and said, “Janice, we’re turning over the tables in the Vatican.”
“Yes, Roy. We are,” I nodded, smiling
.  [And the music swelled….]
Temple cleansing is not easy and can be unsettling. The Vatican showed its resistance by having the Italian police take the WOC banner away from Erin Hanna, as she was the organizer, and putting her and Miriam Duignan, the translator from womenpriests.org in London, into the police car, and with sirens at full blast, taking them to the police station. Then a plainclothes detective of the Italian police violently grabbed the banner away from Roy, pushing him. Roy joked at CTA in Milwaukee earlier this month that when he was driven to the jail in the police car, he had no sirens.

[…]

I bet the comments over there are a hoot.

My response:

I need to buy an Ordination Tambourine.

Posted in Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , ,
97 Comments

More Christmas shopping ideas: Angelus Press will have free shipping.

The nice people at Angelus Press wrote to let me know that:

… this upcoming Monday, November 28, Angelus Press will be offering Free Shipping on all orders to the continental United States.  I’m letting you know since I think that this is a sale of which many of your readers may want to take advantage.

In the past I have recommended their great, small pamphlets on the care of liturgical linens and some of their calendars.  You can find some of the things I have reviewed under my “reviews” tag and “Angelus Press” tag.

Their 2012 calendar features the Mysteries of the Rosary.  For some reason of other, they did not include the Luminous Mysteries.   Hmmm.  I guess that’s because there aren’t 16 months in a year.

They have reprinted many wonderful and perennially useful titles.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
12 Comments

Reader challenge: craft a response

From a readerette (as is):

I am a lady of an age group that never was allowed on the alter. I
always love to see the little server girls and so wish it had been
allowed in my day. I am a Eucharistic minister now and feel so happy to do that service to my Maker. Is the church going to prohibit women from the alter? Manyyoung priests seem to be baying for women to be purged from this service to God. It would grieve me greatly if the women of the church were refused the chance to touch the hem of Our Lords gown as he passes nearby. Surely Christ never refused any service the women of the church offered him? One only has to look at the stations of the cross to see women there all the way loving Christ and reaching out to touch Him and return His Love. I cant understand and it is never explained by any priests why women are to be treated so disrespectfully (the church always seeming to discount us) when
Christ Himself always dignified women. This is not about women priests its about treating women the way Christ treated them. Surely the church wont ban us from the alter?

To my ear, this note has the feeling of what in the talk-radio sphere is a seminar caller. I could be wrong. However, the points that are brought up are commonly heard and read.

Ground rules:

1) Keep your response brief.
2) Do NOT … NOT… engage other people in the combox. Let everyone post his or her own response without worrying that everyone will get out their knives.
3) Think for a while before posting.
4) I am particularly interested in responses by priests.
5) Write as if you are responding to the woman, not responding to this entry. “Dear Ms. Jackson…” (“Jackson” is a generic name.)
6) Don’t be rude.
7) You can respond either way, in agreement or not.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, HONORED GUESTS, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
65 Comments

New architecture and music “team” at the Vatican’s Congregation for Divine Worship?

From the intrepid Andrea Tornielli of Vatican Insider. Not my translation, but my emphases and comments:

New Vatican commission cracks down on church architecture

The new commission will be established shortly, as part of the Congregation for Divine Worship. It will also be in charge of music and singing in the liturgy

ANDREA TORNIELLI
VATICAN CITY
A team [It “equipe”] has been set up, to put a stop to garage style churches, boldly shaped structures that risk denaturing modern places for Catholic worship. [I wonder how that is going to work.] Its task is also to promote singing that really helps the celebration of mass. [Ah yes…  Primum non nocere.] The “Liturgical art and sacred music commission” will be established by the Congregation for Divine Worship over the coming weeks. This will not be just any office, but a true and proper team, [It “squadra”] whose task will be to collaborate with the commissions in charge of evaluating construction projects for churches of various dioceses. The team will also be responsible for the further study of music and singing that accompany the celebration of mass.  [“responsible for study”?  “collaborate”?  “team”?  How on earth is this going to function?  Such a “team” would have to have some actual power.  If it merely a resource local commissions can collaborate with, it is toothless.  No?  Am I getting this wrong?  Of course, if it has some teeth and says to the Bishop of Black Duck that the Church of St. Ipsidipsy in Tall Tree Circle will not be reoriented so that it is apse-backward, won’t the usual suspects start shouting that this was how the CDW ruined the new translation? Vatican IMPOSITION! TYRANNY!]

Cardinal Antonio Cañizares Llovera, Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and Benedict XVI, consider this work as “very urgent”. The reality is staring everyone in the eyes: in recent decades, churches have been substituted by buildings that resemble multi purpose halls. Too often, architects, even the more famous ones, do not use the Catholic liturgy as a starting point and thus end up producing avant-garde constructions that look like anything but a church. These buildings composed of cement cubes, glass boxes, crazy shapes and confused spaces, remind people of anything but the mystery and sacredness of a church. Tabernacles are semi hidden, leading faithful on a real treasure hunt and sacred images are almost inexistent. The new commission’s regulations will be written up over the next few days and will give precise instructions to dioceses. It will only be responsible for liturgical art, not for sacred art in general; and this also goes for liturgical music and singing too. The judicial powers of the Congregation for Divine Worship will have the power to act.

As is known, last 27 September, Benedict XVI transferred jurisdiction of two areas, from the Congregation for the Divine Worship to the Rota Romana (the Holy See’s Court of Appeal), under the motu proprio Quaerit simper. [Great typo!] The first of these areas is the nullity of priestly ordination, which similarly to marriage, can be annulled due to defect of form, consensus and intention, by both the ordaining bishop and the priest who is ordained. The second area is the special licence for marriages that have been contracted but not consummated. These are practices that occupied a lot of Cañizares’ time as head of the dicastery. [Really?]

In his motu proprio, the Pope explained: “Under the current circumstances, it seemed convenient [“è parso conveniente che”] for the Congregation for Divine Worship and the discipline of the sacraments to be mainly devoted to giving fresh impetus to the promotion of the Church’s sacred liturgy, according to the renewal required by the Second Vatican Council since the establishment of the Sacrosanctum Concilium.” The dicastery must therefore devote itself to “giving fresh impulse” to the promotion of the liturgy, giving it the focus insisted upon by Benedict XVI, including and above all by showing an example. In this aspect, in contract [sic] to the initial plans, the idea of a liturgical “reform of the reform” (an expression used by Ratzinger himself when he was a cardinal), seems to be eclipsed by a large-scale project favouring the ars celebrandi and a loyalty to the dictates and instructions of the new missal. It does so without proposing any modifications to the mass. [Ehem… I recall something about a “mutual enrichment”.  Apparently that isn’t supposed to happen yet.]

It is worth remembering, in fact, that the abuse of the liturgy that has gone on in recent decades, becoming common practice, is committed against the laws established by Paul VI’s liturgical reform. It is not therefore the reform that needs to be amended; [The phrase “Say The Black – Do The Red” comes to mind.] rather, further study into the sense of the liturgy and its proper celebration is needed and must be salvaged in some cases. It is for this reason that the Congregation for Divine Worship intends to promote the training of priests, clerics and catechists, starting from the bare basics. By following the example and teaching of Benedict XVI, the Congregation aims to revive a sense of the sacredness and mystery of the liturgy.

Some liturgical texts need to be reviewed, because they are dated, as is the case of the penitence ritual, published in 1974. Indeed, in the years that followed, an apostolic teaching, a motu proprio, a new Code of Canon Law and a new Catechism were published. In this and in some other cases, updates will be needed. The idea Cardinal Cañizares is working on, is that of reaffirming the primacy of grace in human actions, of the need to give space to God’s action in the liturgy as opposed to actions which are left up to human creativity. There will be many opportunities to reflect on these topics. The year 2012 will mark the 50th anniversary of the Second Vatican Council and the year after that will mark the 50th anniversary of the first approved conciliar text, the constitution Sacrosanctum Concilium on the sacred liturgy.  [Not to mention Inter mirifica. Perhaps a coordinated effort with the New Evangelization office and Social Communications might be in order.]

There can be no renewal or effective “new re-evangelization” until our liturgical worship is revitalized. Worship is the key. I believe that Summorum Pontificum must play an important role in this revitalization. At the same time, a concerted effort must be made at every level to make sure that our liturgical books are being followed.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , ,
18 Comments

ACTION ITEM! WDTPRS POLL ALERT

On WaPo we find this tendentious poll.

I’m not suggesting how you should vote… but…

Here are the results so far.

UPDATE  22 Nov 1324 GMT:

UPDATE  22 Nov 1552 GMT:

UPDATE  22 Nov 2134 GMT:

UPDATE 23 Nov 2206 GMT:

UPDATE 30 Nov 0038 GMT:

Something very curious has occurred with that poll. Very curious indeed.

Did they not like the results they originally obtained?

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, POLLS | Tagged
62 Comments

CH: “You cannot be an Anglican and use the Roman Missal.”

On the site of the best Catholic weekly in the UK, The Catholic Herald, there is an interesting piece about Catholic and Anglican and Anglo-Catholic and Anglicanorum coetibus Catholic identity.

The Bishop of London is right about Anglicans using the Roman rite

One cannot be an Anglican and use the Roman Missal – it is one or the other

By Fr Alexander Lucie-Smith on Monday, 21 November 2011

The Bishop of London has written a letter about the Eucharist, which makes interesting reading, and which can be read in full here. I am not an Anglican, and therefore it is not my place to comment on what Dr Chartres has to say to his flock, but there are some things that he says which reflect on us Catholics, which I feel I must comment on.

Dr Chartres writes:

In an age when Aristotle’s analysis of objects in the physical world as being composed of “essences and accidents” was widely accepted, transubstantiation was seen to have value as a picture of how the eucharistic elements were transformed. In the Windsor Agreed Statement which emerged from the first series of international discussions between Anglican and Roman Catholic theologians, transubstantiation appears only in a footnote as “affirming the fact of Christ’s presence and of the mysterious and radical change which takes place. In contemporary Roman Catholic theology it is not understood as explaining how the change takes place.”  [Reminds me about how I was railed at in class during seminary for affirming transubstantiation.  I was told that the old Aristotelean categories are no longer valid and that the Church no longer taught transubstantiation.  I disagreed.  I was thrown out.  But I digress.]

While not wanting to dismiss the Windsor Agreed Statement as irrelevant, or criticizing the wording of that footnote, the truth of the matter is that the doctrine of transubstantiation is not a footnote in Catholic life, but central to Catholic belief, identity and practice. Nor does belief in transubstantiation depend on Aristotle, even if it borrows, or better steals, Aristotelian language. Long after Aristotle is forgotten, or is himself a footnote to theology, the doctrine of transubstantiation will be with us. Transubstantiation is not to be dismissed as an idea whose time has passed. It seems to me that if one were to ignore the clear doctrine of transubstantiation, one would pretty soon find oneself losing one’s belief in the true nature of the Mass as a sacrifice and the doctrine of the Real Presence.

The Bishop then goes on to talk about the “new rites” that the Catholic Church will be adopting this Advent. This is misleading. There are no new rites, there is merely a new translation of the Roman Rite. There has been no innovation, but rather a return to the original text, through greater fidelity to the Latin. [A return toward the original text.] But the Bishop says: “The new Roman rite varies considerably from its predecessor and thus from Common Worship as well.” The first part of this statement is simply factually incorrect; the second part leaves me wondering. What did the old translation have in common with Common Worship that the new translation does not? The Bishop refers to “a convergence of eucharistic doctrine and rites” between Anglicans and Catholics, but he gives no evidence for this optimistic view. Perhaps he means that Common Worship has been modeled on the old translation of the Roman Missal. But what he says about transubstantiation above indicates to me that there has been no substantial convergence, even if there may have been some accidental ones. (That Aristotelian language again!)

Then the Bishop delivers his bombshell, if it may be termed such:

Priests and parishes which do adopt the new rites – with their marked divergences from the ELLC [English Language Liturgical Consultation] texts and in the altered circumstances created by the Pope’s invitation to Anglicans to join the Ordinariate – are making a clear statement of their disassociation not only from the Church of England but from the Roman Communion as well. This is a pastoral unkindness to the laity and a serious canonical matter. The clergy involved have sworn oaths of canonical obedience as well as making their Declaration of Assent. I urge them not to create further disunity by adopting the new rites.

Of course, His Lordship is completely right about this. [NB:] The use of the Roman Missal, in whatever translation, by someone, anyone, who is not authorised by a bishop in communion with Rome, is absolutely wrong. Dr Chartres even goes so far as to mention canon law, which is, I believe, but rarely invoked in the Anglican Communion, which shows how seriously he takes this matter.

The Bishop seems to be putting clear blue water between us Catholics and his own flock, perhaps more clearly than he intends. It is clearly wrong for Anglican clergy to use the Roman Missal, from both an Anglican point of view and from our point of view. [I wonder if that includes both the Roman Missal and the Missale Romanum, in its pre-Conciliar form.] But I would add this: the Roman Missal, especially in the new translation, reflects a very clear belief in the doctrine of transubstantiation which Anglicans do not hold. Therefore they should not use the Missal. Or if they do hold to the doctrine of transubstantiation, they should come into the Ordinariate. [There it is.]

“Three priests in the Diocese have taken this step. They have followed their consciences,” remarks the Bishop speaking of the Ordinariate. Is there a third way? It would seem not. Dr Chartres, while mentioning canon law and its obligations, nevertheless makes no threats: “There will be no persecution and no creation of ritual martyrs,” he says. But the appeal to conscience and indeed logic is clear in this powerfully argued letter. You cannot be an Anglican and use the Roman Missal. It is one or the other. On that all should agree.

Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Pope of Christian Unity, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
60 Comments

Stir Up Sunday Christmas Pudding Prep Report: Part I & II

It’s Stir Up Sunday and time to make a Christmas Pudding, perhaps even in the manner of Max himself!

The first pudding I will make (I may make several for gifts) will be from a recipe suggested in the combox under another entry.    I will probably make one or more smaller puddings using a different recipe, which it’s from Lobscouse and Spotted Dog: Which It’s a Gastronomic Companion to the Aubrey/Maturin Novels.  I the idea of this recipe not only because of the Aubrey/Maturin books but also because it was given to me by a reader of this blog!

However, the first pudding to be made requires a two day process.  So, I start on Stir Up Sunday, since this is when the ingredients must be combined, but really early in the morning.  That way I will have time enough tomorrow for the steaming.

Start with a really large mixing bowl.

20111118-173937.jpg

The apple – finely chopped – came from the tree near the chapel.

I stirred in several stages.

20111118-173955.jpg

Zest from an orange and a lemon.

20111118-174003.jpg

My good ol’ graduated cylinder helps when measuring in ml‘s.

75 ml of stout and of barleywine, each.

20111118-174017.jpg

Do you know what barleywine is?

Yum.

Mixing the beery liquid together, with a bit of rum and eggs.

20111118-174024.jpg

Pouring it into the mix.

20111118-174040.jpg

The consistency: loose.

20111118-174050.jpg

I transferred it into a smaller bowl for its overnight rest.

20111118-174058.jpg

The weight, minus the weight of the bowl… just over 3 lbs.

20111118-174112.jpg

Back to the barleywine.  This was the stuff I used.

20111118-174122.jpg

Since I only needed 75 ml of this… well… what to do… what to do…

Anyway, the pudding must rest over night.

In the next phase, it will be transferred to a greased basin, covered up, tied up, and steamed for 8 hours.

More later…. sleeeeeep.

UPDATE 21 Nov 0115 GMT:

Okay, after a rest of a few hours, I transferred the mix to the pudding basin.

20111118-174134.jpg

I covered it with wrap and tied it down… which is the hardest part of the process, actually.

20111118-174141.jpg

This year I created a handle for easier extraction at the end.

20111118-174158.jpg

Into the kettle for steaming.  I have it propped up on tiny pyrex bowls.

20111118-174206.jpg

Eight hours later…. this is what it looks like!

20111118-174215.jpg

I let it cool and wrapped it up again.

The pudding is now in a covered wooden wine crate in the cellar.

The next time I see this, will be when I get it ready for the next round of steam before it is eaten!

How about your Christmas Puddings?

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen | Tagged , , , ,
26 Comments

PODCAzT 123: The Liturgical Year and a Custom

It is the Last Sunday of the liturgical year.  In the older, traditional form of the Roman Rite it is the 24th and Last Sunday after Pentecost, even though numerically it is the 23rd.  The Last Sunday is always the 24th.

Today we hear from dom Proper Gueranger and his introduction about what the “liturgical year” is all about from his monumental 15 volume The Liturgical Year. I read a little bit of the Preface to the work.  If you can get some of these themes into your head and heart before the beginning of a new year – a year which we will be hearing in a new way! – you may find an extraordinary new depth of participation at Holy Mass.

At the end of this offering a offer some frivolous and, then again, not so frivolous comments about this Sunday, “Stir Up” Sunday (from the first words of the Collect for the Mass for the Last Sunday after Pentecost, and the making of a Christmas Pudding.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, PODCAzT | Tagged , , ,
6 Comments