QUAERITUR: When during Mass should people strike their breasts?

From a reader:

For those of us who attend the Tridintine form of the Holy Mass, we see the servers striking their breasts at several points in the liturgy.

In the Novus Ordo, where are appropriate points for the servers (or faithful) to do the same? In the upcoming revised translation, we have the restored “mea culpa” in the Gloria, but anywhere else? The recitation of “Lord have mercy,” or, “have mercy on us,” comes to my mind.

My bearded-Spock side suggests that during the Novus Ordo – especially considering how it is often celebrated – the faithful should be striking their breasts constantly.

That said, I think there is only one point at what the faithful are directed to strike their breasts: during the Confiteor in the penitential rite at the beginning of Mass.  New, corrected translation:

I confess to Almighty God,
and to you, my brothers and sisters,
that I have greatly sinned
in my thoughts and in my words,
in what I have done and in what I have failed to do,
And, striking their breast, they say:
through my fault, through my fault,
through my most grievous fault;
Then they continue:
therefore I ask blessed Mary ever-Virgin,
all the Angels and Saints,
and you, my brothers and sisters,
to pray for me to the Lord our God.

But in the Novus Ordo, there are various options for the penitential rite.  I’m afraid that this isn’t always used.

That rubric about continuing, by the way, suggests to me that the people should strike thrice, and not just once.  Could one surmise that perhaps a good point at which to strike the breast might be the word “fault”?  Perhaps?  Three times?  I digress.

I suspect the servers, during the Novus Ordo, are imitating the priest who must also strike his breast at a point during the Roman Canon (1st Eucharistic Prayer).  Also, many priests have integrated from the older, traditional form of the Roman Rite, striking their breasts during the Agnus Dei and perhaps also the Domine non sun dignus, just before their own Communion.

St. Augustine said that at the mention of words such as “mercy” or “confess… confiteor his flock would beat their breasts so hard that the sound rumbled in the church.  Romano Guardini (d. 1968) wrote in his 1955 work Sacred Signs:

“To brush one’s clothes with the tips of one’s fingers is not to strike the breast.  We should beat upon our breasts with our closed fists. … It is an honest blow, not an elegant gesture.  To strike the breast is to beat against the gates of our inner world in order to shatter them.  This is its significance. … ‘Repent, do penance.’  It is the voice of God.  Striking the breast is the visible sign that we hear that summons. … Let it wake us up, and make us see, and turn to God”.

The future Pope Benedict XVI wrote in Spirit of the Liturgy (p. 207):

“We point not at someone else but at ourselves as the guilty party, [which] remains a meaningful gesture of prayer. … When we say mea culpa (through my fault), we turn, so to speak, to ourselves, to our own front door, and thus we are able rightly to ask forgiveness of God, the saints, and the people gathered around us, whom we have wronged.”

We oh-so-modern Catholics will benefit from clear talk about sin and the physical action of beating our breast to counteract the “I’m Okay, You’re Okay” rubbish so prevalent today.

We need Mass precisely because we are not “okay”.

Sinners need a Savior.

A realistic recognition of who we are and who we are not is a necessary starting point for all worthy prayer and liturgical worship.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
22 Comments

Blessed Waters and You.

In another entry I answered a question about water suitable for valid baptism.  Someone asked about Holy Water.  Here are a few notes about different blessed waters we Catholics use and enjoy.  This is not meant to be exhaustive, of course.  I just want to give a snapshot to those of you who haven’t heard of these things before.

The blessing and use of Holy Water goes back to very early Christian times.  Using the traditional Roman Ritual, the water for Holy Water is first exorcised.  Exorcised salt is mixed with the water.  In both exorcisms the water and salt are addressed directly, as if they were almost sentient, “O you creature of salt, be thou a blessed salt”, and so forth.  The salt has symbolic value, of course, but sure the saltiness of the water helps retard algae growth.

EasterBaptismal Water or Easter Water is blessed at Easter and at Pentecost.  Easter Water is blessed while mixing in Oil of Catechumens and Sacred Chrism.  The Paschal Candle is also held in the water.   There is a rite for blessing Baptismal Water apart from Easter or Pentecost.  This is the water we generally use for baptism, though in a pinch, other true water may be used.

There is a blessing of water for the reconciliation of a church, or for the blessing of an altar at the time of the consecration of a church called Gregorian Water, which involves the admixture of blessed ashes and blessed salt and blessed wine.

There is also a blessing of water at Epiphany which involves the basic salt and water combination of Holy Water.  However, there is a nice rite which can be performed in the context of, say, Vespers which involves some grand marching around and singing psalms.  This water would be used to bless houses, along with the blessed chalk, of course.  I would like to do this one someday, in the context of sung vespers!

On different feast days priests could bless water in honor of such and such a saint, for example, St. Raymond Nonnatus or St. Ignatius.  Lots of these.

And we mustn’t forget the Benedictio maris, blessing of the sea, wherein, I believe God has already mixed in the salt.  Spectacular prayers.  I’d love to do that one sometime, preferably with a procession with a statue of the Blessed Mother to the shoreline, with the city’s oompa band.  There are blessings of a spring and a well, as well.  When you don’t get your water from a tap, a state to which we may all soon be returning, you want a priest around to bless your water source.  The blessing for the well includes the serious “repulsis hinc phantasmaticis collusionibus, ac diabolicis insidiis, purificatus atque emendatus semper hic puteus perseveret.”  Nice clausula.

Anyway, we Catholics are deeply interested in water and we like our water blessed, thank you very much.  A thousand and one uses!

The devil hates this stuff.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , ,
17 Comments

QUAERITUR: Valid matter, water, for baptism

From a reader:

Several months ago, we attended a violin recital in a Methodist church (did not attend their service) and the pastor announced that he would be doing a “beach baptism”, and I imagine that he used the salt water from the ocean. According to my Angelus Press missal, “Salt water should only be be used when necessary, but should be used then (i.e. in danger of death), and the same applies to melted ice or snow.” Because the pastor announced this, it didn’t sound like a case of extreme necessity.

That said, would such a baptism (using salt water) be valid if there was no danger of death?

Salt water is really water.  Melted ice is, last time I checked, water.  Melted snow is, last time I checked, water.  Valid baptism is conferred using true liquid water, sweet or salt.

Yes, salt water can be used.    As a matter of fact, the Holy Water blessed by the priest using the older, traditional form of the Roman Ritual has salt in it, exorcised salt.   Were a priest to use Holy Water to baptize, surely that would be valid matter.

Baptismal Water, blessed on Easter or Pentecost, does not have exorcised salt in it, as does Holy Water.

In any event, it is always best to follow the official books given to us by the Catholic Church for the conferral of valid sacraments, no?  The only reason why we would care what a Methodist minister might say about the water she is going to use for a baptism is that, when the baptized person wants to become a Catholic, we want to be sure that valid matter was used.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
14 Comments

CNA: Prosecutor cuts deal with Bp. Finn, diocese because the case is weak?

You read, for sure, about the deal struck between Bp. Finn of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph and the county where Kansas City, MO is located. From CNA comes this.

Bishop Finn agreement seems to indicate prosecution’s weak case

Kansas City, Mo., Nov 17, 2011 / 05:13 am (CNA/EWTN News).- A county prosecutor’s agreement with Bishop Robert Finn of Kansas City-St. Joseph is a sign of the weakness of the charge that the bishop illegally failed to report suspected child sex abuse, a Missouri lawyer says.

The prosecutor of Clay County, Missouri is “reluctant” to follow the lead of the prosecutor in Jackson County because “he wasn’t going to have a successful prosecution,” St. Louis attorney Michael Quinlan suggested.

“The prosecution is avoiding a risky trial, and the bishop is avoiding what would be a less risky trial, but certainly a tremendous expense and bad publicity and all the terrible things that go along with that,” said Quinlan, who is not involved in the case.

“I would have thought that this would suggest to the prosecuting authorities in Jackson County that they might step back from the brink, but I don’t know whether it will have that effect or not.”

In Quinlan’s view, the possibility of a conviction is “slim” and the relevant statute “simply does not apply to the circumstance.”

“I think a fair minded jury should and would conclude that, there being no abuse victim, there could be no requirement to report,” he told CNA on Nov. 16.

Jackson County prosecutors have indicted Bishop Finn and the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph on one misdemeanor count of failure to report suspected abuse of minors by a priest who faces child pornography charges.

Prosecutors in neighboring Clay County, however, have reached a five-year agreement with the bishop.

Under the agreement’s terms, the bishop must meet face-to-face with the Clay County prosecutor Daniel L. White each month for the next five years to discuss any allegations of child sex abuse against clergy or diocesan staff within the diocese’s facilities in the county. Bishop Finn must also describe what steps the diocese has taken to address any allegations.

White would then decide whether to encourage police to investigate any allegations.

The bishop also agreed to visit all nine parishes in Clay County to outline new programs that the diocese is implementing to protect children. The diocesan ombudsman and a new director of child and youth protection will accompany the bishop at the meetings.

[…]

Read the rest there.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
Comments Off on CNA: Prosecutor cuts deal with Bp. Finn, diocese because the case is weak?

There should be market consequences for Benetton: make it happen

I picked this up from Catholic Vote and share it now with you.  I think the suggestions below are good.  Remember that the Christmas “buying” season is coming up.  Make a dent.

I won’t post the disgusting photo in question.

International clothing retailer Benetton pulled a provocative ad featuring Pope Benedict XVI kissing a Muslim cleric on Wednesday after the Vatican threatened legal action to protect the pope’s image.

Vatican spokesman Rev. Federico Lombardi had called the Benetton campaign a “totally unacceptable” show of “grave disrespect.”

The image of Benedict kissing Sheikh Ahmed Mohamed El-Tayeb, imam of the renowned al-Azhar Mosque in Cairo, was pulled almost immediately after the Vatican protested.

“We reiterate that the meaning of this campaign is exclusively to combat the culture of hatred in all its forms,” a Benetton Group spokesman said in an official statement. [USA Today]

That’s a start, but I want you to join me in demanding Benetton go farther. Why? Because Benetton has a long track record of doing things like this (a previous ad of theirs depicted a priest kissing a nun) and second, because Benetton is going to make a lot of money off of this advertising campaign. It’s designed to be offensive and will attract sales among people who endorse mocking the pope.

Here’s my simple plan: let’s all get together and say “bye, bye” to buying Benetton until they make a donation to the papal foundation.

Benetton claims its “UNHATE” campaign is dedicated to “the creation of a new culture of tolerance.” Fine. The Papal Foundation, the pope and the Catholic Church are at the forefront of creating a peaceful and loving culture worldwide. Instead of trying to make money by offending those who actually promote love and peace, Benetton should help them out for a change by donating a chunk of change to them.

Here’s three things you can do now to join the “bye bye, Benetton” movement:

1. Join facebook.com/boycottbenetton

2. Retweet this status announcing you’re joining the boycott

3. Tell your friends.

In the meantime, there’s a Benetton store a few miles from where I live. I won’t be darkening their door again until I see Benetton change course.

Let’s turn this offensive example of mocking the pope into positive support for the pope’s mission!

UPDATE 1: An observant reader notes that Benetton still references the pope and this photo in their online press materials.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged ,
39 Comments

Pope Benedict: Everyone should pray the psalms, Liturgy of the Hours

Pope Benedict during his Wednesday Audience said:

“I would like to renew my call to everyone to pray the Psalms, to become accustomed to using the Liturgy of the Hours, Lauds, Vespers, and Compline.”

From VIS:

Wednesday, November 16, 2011
PRAYING THE PSALMS ENRICHES OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD

VATICAN CITY, 16 NOV 2011 (VIS) – During today’s general audience in St Peter’s Square, attended by over 11,000 pilgrims, the Holy Father imparted the final catechesis of his cycle dedicated to the Psalms. He focused on Psalm 110, which “Jesus Himself cited, and which the authors of the New Testament referred to widely and interpreted in reference to the Messiah. … It is a Psalm beloved by the ancient Church and by believers of all times”, which celebrates “the victorious and glorified Messiah seated at the right hand of God”.

The Psalm begins with a solemn declaration: “The Lord says to my lord: ‘Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies your footstool”. Benedict XVI explained that “Christ is the Lord enthroned, the Son of man seated at the right hand of God. … He is the true king who by resurrection entered into glory, … higher than the angels, seated in the heavens over all other powers, … and with all His adversaries at His feet until the last enemy, death, is definitively defeated by Him”.

God and the king celebrated in the Psalm are inseparably linked. “The two govern together, to the point that the Psalmist confirms that God Himself grants the regal sceptre, giving the king the task of defeating his adversaries. … The exercise of power is a task the king receives directly from the Lord, a responsibility which involves dependence and obedience, thus becoming a sign to the people of God’s powerful and provident presence. Dominion over enemies, glory and victory are gifts the king has received, that make him a mediator of divine triumph over evil“.

The priestly dimension, linked to that of regality, appears in verse four. “The Lord has sworn and will not change his mind ‘You are a priest forever, according to the order of Melchizedek'”. This priest, the king of Salem, had blessed Abraham and offered bread and wine following the victorious military campaign conducted by the patriarch to save Lot from the hands of his enemies. The king of the Psalm “will be a priest forever, mediator of the divine presence among His people, a catalyst for the blessing of God”. Jesus Christ “is the true and definitive priest, Who will complete and perfect the features of Melchizedek’s priesthood”. In the bread and wine of the Eucharist, Christ “offers Himself and, defeating death, brings life to all believers”.

The final verses portray “the triumphant sovereign who, with the support of the Lord, having received power and glory from Him, opposes his enemies, defeating adversaries and judging nations”.

The Church traditionally considers this Psalm as one of the most significant messianic texts. “The king as sung by the Psalmist is Christ, the Messiah Who establishes the Kingdom of God and overcomes the powers of the world. He is the Word generated by God before any creature, the Son incarnate, Who died and rose to heaven, the eternal Priest Who, in the mystery of the bread and wine, grants forgiveness for sins and reconciliation with God; the King Who raised his head in triumph over death by His resurrection”.

The Psalm invites us to “look to Christ to understand the meaning of true regality which is to be lived as service and the giving of self, following a path of obedience and love ‘to the end’. Praying this Psalm, we therefore ask the Lord to enable us to proceed along this same journey, following Christ, the Messiah, willing to ascend with Him on the hill of the cross to accompany Him in glory, and to look to Him seated at the right hand of the Father, the victorious king and merciful priest Who gives forgiveness and salvation to all mankind”.

Finally, the Pope explained that, in the course of his catechesis dedicated to the Psalms, he had sought to focus on those “that reflect the different situations in life and the various attitudes we may have towards God. I would like to renew my call to everyone to pray the Psalms, to become accustomed to using the Liturgy of the Hours, Lauds, Vespers, and Compline. Our relationship with God can only be enriched by our journeying towards Him day after day”.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
96 Comments

On the preparation of Christmas Pudding: advice sought

Since Stir-Up Sunday is upon us and it is time to make the Christmas Pudding, I thought consult in advance with some of you who have experience.  I made one last year, of course.  It was wonderful.  I shared it at the end of a nice meal with my literary group which gathers on roughly a monthly bases.  It was a real hit.  It had a nice sprig of holly sent by a reader here and also took the fire well when the moment came.

I will be using once again the Christmas Pudding recipe from a cookbook for food mentioned in O’Brien’s books. Lobscouse and Spotted DogWhich it’s called Lobscouse and Spotted Dog: Which It’s a Gastronomic Companion to the Aubrey/Maturin Novels. I want to use this book because it was given to me by a reader of this blog!

This year, I was thinking about using dark bread bread-crumbs this year.  Does anyone have any thought about this?  For example, pumpernickel?

Last year I thought the pudding was a bit light in color.  I opined at the time that this was partly a result of using a lighter color brown sugar.

Last year’s pudding.  It seemed light in color.

Also, since I will making a meal before the use of this pudding, I decided to add a couple jars of brandy butter sauce to my wishlist.  That said… any tips about making it from scratch?

UPDATE 15 Nov 1637 GMT:

One of the commentators, below, suggested this recipe, which I believe I shall try.  Intriguing, but I need to gather additional ingredients.

In that recipe there is an ingredient called “mixed spice”.

That seemed a bit vague, so I looked it up.  Sure enough, there is something called – keep in mind that I am no baker – “mixed spice”, which is pretty much analogous to a “pumpkin pie spice” mix, involving your expected cinnamon, clove, nutmeg, ginger, etc.  That mix brought two things to mind.

First, many people these days are ordering Mystic Monk Coffee in the “Pumpkin Spice” flavored version.  You can order some too.  Now, as a matter of fact!  It’s swell!

Second, speaking of Pumpkin Pie, which may be my favorite, there is this ditty entitled “Farewell O Fragrant Pumpkin Pie”:

Farewell, O fragrant pumpkin pie!
Dyspeptic pork, adieu!
Though to the college halls I hie.
On field of battle though I die, my latest sob, my latest sigh
shall wafted be to you!
And thou, O doughnut rare and rich and fried divinely brown!
Thy form shall fill a noble niche in memory’s chamber whilst I pitch
my tent beside the river which rolls on through Kingston town.
And my Love—my little Nell,
the apple of my eye to thee how can I say farewell?
I love thee more than I can tell;
I love thee more than anything—but—pie!

I will now squash this digression and return us to our Christmas Puddings.

And you can help me make them!

UPDATE 1432 GMT:
Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen, Lighter fare, O'Brian Tags | Tagged , , , , ,
33 Comments

Looking for gift ideas for priests? Here’s one!

I have had a few notes from people asking for ideas about what to give to priests for Christmas.  Yes, I know it is early, but getting these things done early is better than leaving them to the last minute… sort of like confession.

Because the great Vincenzo, official WDTPRS photoshoper, has been so good to me over the years, I want to push his fun Pius Clock.  I have one.

A clock with the Popes Pii as the numbers.  Fun.

I got the large wall clock.

This CD gives you a sense of the scale.

On the wall over my desk area.

I encourage you to check out Vincenzo’s online Pope Pius Clock store and “give him the business”.

Vincenzo has often amused us here with his good humor in the images he has created and posted in comments. He has been of help to this blog with some graphics work.

We can’t know if we will ever see a Pius XIII. Until such time, the Popes Pius are serving in yet another role!

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
18 Comments

Anglican Use Mass – differences? Similarities?

Yesterday at the USCCB meeting it was announced that the Anglican Ordinariate for the USA would be set up officially on 1 January 2012 according to the provisions in Pope Benedict’s Anglicanorum coetibus.

I get questions occasionally about the liturgical worship of former Anglicans who are now in union with Rome.  I must admit I don’t know much about it.

Today, however, someone sent a link to a page with two embedded videos.  One of them shows the consecration during an Anglican Use Mass.

[wp_youtube]r5fYCFqGGWE[/wp_youtube]

It might be helpful for the whole readership here, and for me, to have a discussion of some of the differences and similarities of Anglican Use worship and the Roman Rite.

And Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes | Tagged , , ,
57 Comments

QUAERITUR: Priest’s role, duty when someone “misuses” confession

From a reader:

When does the Seal of Confession actually take affect in that the priest can’t say anything outside of the Confessional? For example, if someone goes into the confessional/reconciliation room with no intention of confessing, but some form of misuse, would the seal of confession be in effect and the priest not able to rebuke the person outside the confessional, or if misuse became a problem among the congregation, speak out about it from the pulpit?

I must admit that I am not sure what you are talking about.

But let’s be clear about something.

If someone “misuses” the confessional, the priest or other people present should immediately put a stop to the “misuse”.  If a person commits a crime around or in a confessional, that crime should be stopped and reported to the police. If someone gets into a confessional and makes problems, the priest is within his rights to raise his voice, to get out of the confessional, to seek help from bystanders or authorities, and to defend himself and others nearby.

Just because the priest is sitting in the confessional, that doesn’t mean he is forced by the Church’s law to take abuse and do nothing.  He doesn’t have to allow others to be mistreated and do nothing.  And once the incident is a matter of public knowledge the priest can speak about it.

You might also spend some time reflecting also on what a horrible sin sacrilege is.

To raise your hand against a priest is not only a sin because of the harm you might do to a person, it is also the sin of sacrilege, because the person is a sacred person, ordained.  David did not spare the man who killed Saul, because that man raised his hand against the Lord’s anointed, in that case, the king.  If this is the case for a king, it is also the case for sacred persons, and even more serious for a priest or bishop.

Misuse of sacred things, places and persons is the sin of sacrilege.  The confessional is a sacred thing and place and the church is a sacred place.  Intending to harm the Lord’s anointed by physical violence or by detraction is a serious sin.

ADDENDUM:

If someone get’s into the confessional to discuss something that has nothing to do with making a sacramental confession, I suppose that could be called “misuse” of the confessional.  However, in that case, because no “problem” or “ruckus” was caused, even though there wasn’t any sacramental confession involving the Seal, the priest should probably just treat it as if it were under the Seal and not discuss it lest there by any risk that people think he is breaking the Seal.  This is a tricky one, of course. It would depend on what was being discussed.  If someone got into the confessional and reported that there was a crime being committed, but the person thinks there is anonymity similar to that properly expected by a penitent making a sacramental confession, the priest had better inform the person that the Seal may not apply.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , ,
15 Comments