Dr. Krauthammer on Pres. Obama’s attack on “corporate jets”

Were Charles Krauthammer to run for President I might just vote for him.  Just think of the great press conferences and State of the Union addresses.

Yesterday, Dr. K had provide Special Report on Fox News Channel a blistering and at the same time hilarious analysis of something Pres. Obama claimed during his seemingly endless press conference, which I watch for penance for my many sins.

I wanted a video but NRO transcribed it, ne pereat.

From Wednesday night’s Fox News All-Stars.

On President Obama’s attack on the corporate jet tax break to achieve debt reduction:

He himself, as we just heard, said you can’t reduce the deficit to the levels we need without raising revenues. Then he talks about the [tax break for] corporate jets, which he mentioned not once but six times.

I did the math on this. If you collect the corporate jet tax every year for the next 5,000 years, you will cover one year of the debt that Obama has run up. One year.

To put it another way, if you started collecting that tax at the time of John the Baptist and you collected it every year — first in shekels and now in dollars — you wouldn’t be halfway to covering one year of the amount of debt that Obama has run up.

As for the other one, he mentions again and again, the oil depreciation tax break — if you collect that one for 700 years, you won’t cover a year of Obama deficits.

And then here’s my favorite. I worked it out in the car on the way here. If you collect the corporate jets and the oil tax together — get all the bad guys and the fat cats at once — and you collect it for 100 years, it covers the amount of debt Obama added… in February!

And he pretends that he’s the serious adult at the table.

Posted in Just Too Cool, The Drill | Tagged , , , , , ,
65 Comments

Feet

From 17-18 June in England there was an “Invocation Weekend“.

Here is a shot that causes, at least caused me, a double-take.

His Hermeneuticalness has more on the event.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
13 Comments

Spiffy

L’Osservatore Romano is going for baroque.

Now about that … content.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
6 Comments

Defense of marriage in Minnesota

The Winona (Minnesota) Daily has an opinion piece about the defense of true marriage, and the attacks on true marriage by proponents of relationships that are contrary to nature.

My emphases and comments.

Dick Houck: Marriage based on children, not love

By DICK HOUCK | St. Paul | Posted: Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Recent letters to the editor allege that support for maintaining the traditional definition of marriage in the eyes of the law is based on fear and bigotry, particularly religiously motivated bigotry. [Which would make resistance to contrary-to-nature unions a… hate crime.  Right?  That’s the next phase, folks.]

However, a closer examination of the institution of marriage and the reason government recognizes it shows those claims are false.

Man and woman naturally complement each other physically, emotionally, psychologically and spiritually. They were made to give themselves completely and fully to each other, for the two to become one. Marriage is merely one man and one woman making a complete and total gift of self to the other, for the rest of their earthly lives, and this is consummated in the act of sexual intercourse, which reflects and echoes this two becoming one in a physical way.

The two literally become “one flesh” and this one flesh union is the sole means by which human life is transmitted. [There are a lot of people trying to change that.] This procreative capacity of marriage is the reason the government recognizes and bestows financial and legal benefits on it that are not bestowed on any other union. Those benefits are given to bind the husband and wife together, to bind the children to their mother and father, and to help the mother and father financially support their children, because children do best when they grow up in a stable home with their mother and father.

Recognizing marriage and endowing it with government benefits helps guarantee such an environment for children, and government has a compelling reason to do this in virtue of its responsibility to safeguard and promote the common good.

Government is justified in denying same-sex relationships as equivalent with marriage for the simple fact that same-sex sexual acts, such as sodomy and mutual masturbation, are inherently sterile and can never under any circumstances result in the transmission of human life.

In the words of a venerable law professor from Minnesota “The government is not in the love business, but the baby business.” [Stop here.  Do you see a problem with this?  What contrary-to-nature unions involves is not.really.love.  It isn’t love, properly understood.  Whatever it is it is something … and there’s no denying that it could be strong or emotional.  But it isn’t truly love.]

Moreover, when the government changes the legal definition of marriage, all laws that mention marriage are automatically changed, and some of these changes jeopardize the religious freedoms of religious organizations and individuals.

For instance, in Washington, D.C., and in Massachusetts, Catholic Charities was forced to abandon its adoption services because it would not place children with same-sex couples in contravention of Catholic teachings. [Could that actually be a form of child-abuse?  Allowing children to be adopted by same-sex couples?] A more ominous example is found in Canada, where a Catholic bishop was brought before a human rights tribunal accused of hate speech on several occasions for preaching homilies that merely articulated and explained Catholic teaching that same-sex sexual acts are sinful.  [What did I say?]

Although he was acquitted, in a similar case from Sweden, a Protestant pastor was convicted of hate speech for preaching a similar homily and his conviction was upheld by the highest court of Sweden and only overturned on appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.

Proponents of same-sex marriage claim this is a matter of civil rights, but what about the religious freedom of religious organizations and ordinary citizens? Isn’t that a civil right? Yet recognition of same-sex marriage would imperil that civil right. [It won’t be for long if they have their way.]

Lastly, where is the discrimination? All men and all women are treated equally. There are many things the law prevents us from doing, murder for example. “Marrying” someone of the same sex is one of those things and that does not discriminate.

We thus encourage all people of goodwill in this great state to support the Minnesota Marriage Amendment.

Dick Houck is president of the Catholic Defense League.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
19 Comments

The Feeder Feed: some Orioles and a not-Oriole

Just a couple shots.

The young Orioles are still around.

They fight over the grape jelly.

You lookin’ at me?

Really blue.


Posted in Lighter fare, The Feeder Feed | Tagged ,
3 Comments

AFP: China detains Vatican-backed Catholic priest

From Agence France-Presse:

China detains Vatican-backed Catholic priest

(AFP) – 6 hours ago

BEIJING — Chinese police detained a Vatican-backed Catholic priest and blocked his ordination as a bishop, a parishioner said Thursday, in a move likely to raise tensions with the Holy See.

The detention of Joseph Sun Jigeng came as China’s state-run Catholic church reportedly ordained another bishop without the consent of the Vatican, which stipulates ordinations can only go ahead with the Holy See’s blessing.

“Joseph Sun Jigeng was taken away by police on June 26 and he has not been released,” a member of the Handan Catholic church in northern China’s Hebei province told AFP by phone.

“On June 29, we had planned to have the ordination ceremony, but the police have blocked the road and no ceremony can be held. Police said it was an ‘illegal activity’,” said the church member, who refused to be named.

But the Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association (CPCA) — which controls the state-backed church — denied Sun, 43, had been detained when contacted by AFP, while police in Handan refused to comment.

[…]

Last week, the Beijing-backed church said it wanted to ordain at least 40 bishops “without delay”.

On Wednesday, Paul Lei Shiyin was ordained without Vatican approval as the bishop of Leshan in a ceremony held in southwest China’s Sichuan province, the Vatican-linked AsiaNews website reported.

Liu Bainian, deputy head of the CPCA, confirmed Lei’s ordination but was noncommittal about Vatican approval.

“We have not contacted the Vatican on this, but I think they know it. I’m not sure whether they agreed to this or not,” he said.

China’s 5.7 million Catholics are caught between staying loyal to the ruling Communist Party or showing allegiance to the pope as part of an “underground” Church not recognised by the authorities.

Posted in The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

How to make your parish more self-centered

Tim Drake, a columnist for the National Catholic Register (Register – Good.  Reporter – Bad.) has 14 points for how to make your parish more self-centered.

(The point is: Parishes should not be self-centered.)

Here are the points.  You can read his commentary on each point over there.

14. Community Center
13. Move the Music to the Front
12. No More Smells and Bells
11. Ditch the Artwork
10. Remove the Stations of the Cross
9. Scrap the Kneelers
8. Favor the Horizontal over the Vertical
7. Technologize
6. Better Bread
5. Turn the Mass into a Talk Show
4. Get Rid of Reconciliation
3. Social Center
2. Play with the Liturgy
1. Move the Tabernacle

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
45 Comments

Protest blasphemy

This came in my email from American Needs Fatima.

Caution: blasphemous material.

Please protest the Southern California Premiere of the blasphemous show Jerry Springer: The Opera, which is full of profanity, impurity and blasphemous content, such as

  • The Crucifixion is mocked and the Eucharist is trashed
  • There is a lady singing “Jerry eleison” (mocking the Mass: Kyrie Eleison)
  • Jesus is introduced as “the hypocrite son of the fascist tyrant on high.” He wears a diaper, is fat and effeminate.
  • Eve gropes Jesus in a manner too indecent to describe while the Annunciation is described as immorality.
  • God is a fat man in a white suit who complains about being blamed for everyone’s problems.  He invites Jerry Springer to join Him to “sit in Heaven beside me, hold my hand and guide me.”  At the end, Jerry emerges as the true savior of mankind.

You and I cannot accept such insults to Our Lord and the Catholic Faith!

Send your e-protest message to the Chance Theater in Anaheim California

I suggest also praying the maledictory psalms for their conversion.

I note that this theater receives funding from the Anaheim Arts Council, which is an organization of the City of Anaheim.  I assume that this blasphemous show is receiving support of taxes on the people of Anaheim.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged
Comments Off on Protest blasphemy

Lose the bear.

Another view.

Posted in Lighter fare |
5 Comments

Pope Benedict, the lark and the raven

I picked up something from Ignatius Insight which caught my eye.  They posted an excerpt from Pope Benedict’s autobiographical Milestones: Memoirs 1927-1977.

His Holiness recounted something that happened during his ordination to the priesthood, sixty years ago today as I write.  The Pope wrote:

We were more than forty candidates, who, at the solemn call on that radiant summer day, which I remember as the high point of my life, responded “Adsum”, Here I am. We should not be superstitious; but, at that moment when the elderly archbishop laid his hands on me, a little bird—perhaps a lark—flew up from the high altar in the cathedral and trilled a little joyful song. And I could not but see in this a reassurance from on high, as if I heard the words “This is good, you are on the right way.”

Now for a personal anecdote of my own.

In April 2005 for Pope Benedict’s first big Mass in St. Peter’s Square to inaugurate his pontificate, and when people were still buzzing a bit about why he chose the name “Benedict”, another interesting bird event occurred.

For that Mass I happily had a break from work for Fox News (I was on a lot as a contributor and doing “color commentary” in those days).  For the Mass I was in the press section on top of one of the big “arms” which stretch out from the Basilica, rather close to the Basilica itself in the straight part before the arm curves.

I believe it was just after the sermon of the Mass, in a silent aftermath … no choir singing, no organ playing, no one talking… a raven flew out from behind the Basilica, on our arm’s side, swooped in a couple circles over where the altar was positions, cawing loudly, and then disappeared whence it came.

Benedict chose the name “Benedict” in part because of the pivotal figure of St. Benedict of Nursia, whose monastic tradition played such an important role in the developed of liturgical worship and in the preservation of Western civilization.

St. Benedict is very often depicted with a raven in artistic representations.

“But Father! But Father!”, some of you are surely saying.  “A raven? Isn’t that a bad bird?  Isn’t a raven is sign of something …  ummm…. bad?”

Yes, the raven has developed some bad P.R. over the centuries.  But the raven also has its good press.

Consider, for example, the Bible.  Elijah was fed by ravens in the wilderness.

St. Gregory the Great (+603) wrote of the life of St. Benedict.  Gregory in his Dialogues tells how in the wilderness Benedict fed a raven with some of his meager bread.  Later, when a wicked priest tried to kill Benedict with poisoned bread, Benedict asked the raven to take the deadly morsel away and put it where it couldn’t harm anyone.

Gregory writes:

Then the raven, opening its beak wide and spreading its wings, began to run around the bread, cawing, as if to indicate that it wanted to obey but was unable to carry out the order. Again and again the man of God told him to do it, saying, ‘Pick it up, pick it up. Do not be afraid. Just drop it where it cannot be found.’ After hesitating a long time, the raven took the bread in its beak, picked it up and flew away. Three hours later it came back, after having thrown the bread away, and received its usual ration from the hands of the man of God.

Toward the end of the sermon at that inaugural Mass, Pope Benedict – newly and reluctantly elected – said:

At this point, my mind goes back to 22 October 1978, when Pope John Paul II began his ministry here in Saint Peter’s Square. His words on that occasion constantly echo in my ears: “Do not be afraid! Open wide the doors for Christ!” The Pope was addressing the mighty, the powerful of this world, who feared that Christ might take away something of their power if they were to let him in, if they were to allow the faith to be free. Yes, he would certainly have taken something away from them: the dominion of corruption, the manipulation of law and the freedom to do as they pleased. But he would not have taken away anything that pertains to human freedom or dignity, or to the building of a just society. The Pope was also speaking to everyone, especially the young. Are we not perhaps all afraid in some way? If we let Christ enter fully into our lives, if we open ourselves totally to him, are we not afraid that He might take something away from us? Are we not perhaps afraid to give up something significant, something unique, something that makes life so beautiful? Do we not then risk ending up diminished and deprived of our freedom? And once again the Pope said: No! If we let Christ into our lives, we lose nothing, nothing, absolutely nothing of what makes life free, beautiful and great. No! Only in this friendship are the doors of life opened wide. Only in this friendship is the great potential of human existence truly revealed. Only in this friendship do we experience beauty and liberation. And so, today, with great strength and great conviction, on the basis of long personal experience of life, I say to you, dear young people: Do not be afraid of Christ! He takes nothing away, and he gives you everything. When we give ourselves to him, we receive a hundredfold in return. Yes, open, open wide the doors to Christ – and you will find true life. Amen.

In another connection, it was at that inaugural Mass that Pope Benedict received his pallium as Bishop of Rome, just as today, on his 60th Jubilee and the Feast of Sts. Peter and Paul, he conferred the pallium on others.

Do say prayers for the Holy Father, asking God to give him the graces he needs not to be afraid in his role as Vicar of Christ.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Linking Back, Patristiblogging | Tagged , , ,
19 Comments