QUAERITUR: Traditional Mass but newer office

From a reader:

Father, I seem to be in a quandry about the liturgy. I attend a Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter Parish in Tulsa and I am an Oblate of Clear Creek monastery, which also uses the 1962 liturgies. My question is this: Is there anything really wrong with using the Liturgy of the Hours as my daily Office? I’ve heard all the standard arguments from my ‘super-traddy’ friends, but they don’t seem to wash. I have an FSSP priest-friend that uses the LOH and is quite pleased with it. What’s all the fuss.

First, it is good that you are interested in the Church’s other liturgical prayer, the office, either with the Breviarium Romanum or some smaller office, or the Liturgy of the Hours.

Since you are a layman without the obligation to recite any office, you are free to do as it pleases you to do.  Use this book or that.  Say it all, or a little, or none at all.

That said, it makes sense to use the older books together and the newer books together.  This way what you do at Mass and with the office has more coordination, especially between the calendars.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
30 Comments

QUAERITUR: Explain devil to very small children

Can some parents help with this?

From a reader:

My four yr. old grandson saw a “devil” Halloween outfit and asked his parents alot of questions to his parents.

They asked me to explain things about the devil to him. Kids in preschool liken Satan like a bad super hero foe. Some of these poor misguided children ( and parents who should know better ) actually want to be a devil for Halloween. ( I do not like Halloween – it isn’t what it should be…… unless we dress the children like saints !)

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, SESSIUNCULA |
43 Comments

Sunday Supper: Dies Domini

I needed today.

The Solemn TLM this morning at Assumption Grotto parish in Detroit was well-attended and  well served.  The music, by Stravinsky, was – for me – transporting.  It was a delight to hear the Mass in the setting for which it was composed, a Mass written from true piety.  A great advantage was having a conductor who is a priest, who loves the older Mass and who also has a veneration for the composer.  He really got it.  I heard things in the music I hadn’t ever heard in recordings.

After Mass there was a big parish event, a luncheon and raffle and your usual parish fundraiser things with lots of people and kids (note the distinction).  Quite a few blog readers!

Then a real treat.

Fr. Perrone is a gifted musician.  His instrument is the pianoforte.  He and a parishioner, a very good soprano (not to mention mother of a seminarian) gave a mini recital in the parlor of the rectory of small song cycle by a 20th century Italian Francesco Santoliquido.  This little known writer fell out of favor after the war for having written some anti-Jewish things.  He eventually settled in Anacapri and Anacapri was the setting of the songs I heard today, for soprano and piano.

Sheer delight.

The songs themselves were evocative.  You were on Capri, in the different times of day and different seasons.  Santoliquido also wrote the texts.  The performance was fine.

But one of the best aspects of it was the decorum of the moment.

People used to  learn to play and sing and they would provide their own live entertainment in their homes.  They read aloud and played music and sang.  You regulars know that I enjoy the books of Patrick O’Brien in which the principles play music together on shipboard.  Many people were accomplished.

It was so very human.  It was a delight.

Then… off for ice cream with the priests of the house and the sister from the convent.

People should be together on Sundays.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
15 Comments

WDTPRS: 21st Sunday after Pentecost – “the sort of Collect liberals hate”

I am amused and horrified whenever I hear liberals propose that we modern men and women are all grown up now and that we no longer have to kneel as if cowering before a stern master God.

With that in mind… let’s have a look at the Collect for the upcoming Sunday in the TLM – 1962 Missale Romanum.  This a portion from my article for The Wanderer.

This Collect has been in use at least since the time of the Liber Sacramentorum Gellonensis, which is a variation of the ancient Gregorian Sacramentary.  It survived the Novus Ordo cutter-snippers as the Collect for the 5th Sunday of Ordinary Time.

COLLECT (1962MR)
Familiam tuam, quaesumus, Domine,
continua pietate custodi:
ut a cunctis adversitatibus,
te protegente, sit libera;
et bonis actibus tuo nomini sit devota.

The first part was used almost like a template in other prayers, as in the Collect of the 5th Sunday after Epiphany: “Familiam tuam, quaesumus, Domine, continua pietate custodi, ut, quae in sola spe gratiae caelestis innititur, tua semper protectione muniatur.”   Note not only the similar beginning, but also a connection in the vocabulary with that form of protego.  This suggests to me that the prayers are related.

That word familia, though it seems so familiar, should have some attention.  Familia and forms of famulus occur often in our prayers.  Think of the line in the Roman Canon including “Memento, Domine, famulorum, famularumque tuarum… Be mindful, O Lord, of Your household servants and handmaids”.  These words look like “family”, as does familia, and that is often appropriate depending on the context.  However, the core meaning of the root of the word, fama, which comes from Latin’s ancient cousin Oscan must guide our minds to the whole body of people in an ancient household, including especially the servants.  The different words for “family” in Latin include all the servants and staff, with the extended family, not just the core.  The paterfamilias, “father of the family” had virtual power of life and death over most of his household and his word was law.

Custodio, common in military language, means “to watch, protect, keep, defend, guard”.

Pietas is complicated, as we have seen many times.  Obvious English “piety” comes from this, but the Latin is more involved.  Your Lewis & Short Dictionary, oddly cheap considering its usefulness, says pietas is “dutiful conduct toward the gods, one’s parents, relatives, benefactors, country, etc., sense of duty.” The classic application of pietas and the adjective pius is to the figure of Aeneas in the Latin poet Virgil’s Aeneid.  As Troy was being destroyed by the Greeks after the incident with the wooden horse, Virgil (+A.D. 19) has Aeneas carry his elderly father Anchises from the wreckage of the burning city while leading his little son along by hand.  This image of the man with his father on his back and his son by the hand perfectly expresses the duties Aeneas, future founder of what will become Rome, had toward his family, his pietas.  He was also scrupulous in relation to the gods.  So he is usually called pius Aeneas, which as you now know is far more complicated than the mere “pious Aeneas”.

Christians adapted ancient terms like this to a new context, to express new meanings. In Jerome’s Vulgate in both Old and New Testament pietas is “conscientiousness, scrupulousness regarding love and duty toward God.”  You see that the core of pietas remains “duty.”  Pietas is also one of the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit (cf. CCC 733-36; Isaiah 11:2), by which we are duly affectionate and grateful toward our parents, relatives and country, as well as to all men living insofar as they belong to God or are godly, and especially to the saints.  In loose or common parlance, “piety” indicates fulfilling the duties of religion.  Sometimes “pious” is even used in a negative way, as when people take aim at external displays of religious dutifulness as opposed to what they is “genuine” practice (cf. Luke 18:9-14).

All this is involved when we use pietas to describe ourselves, what human beings have regarding, God, family, country, etc.   But in our prayer today, we are asking God to guard us with His pietas.   When we speak of the pietas of God, we are generally referring to His mercy toward us.  While it is not strictly right to imply that God has a duty toward us, He has made promises and God is true to His promises.  We can depend on Him not because He is obliged by pietas, as we are, but because He is loving and merciful.  So, God’s pietas towards us has a different tone altogether.

I note as well that in that line from the Canon I quoted above in respect to familia, down the line a bit, we come to the Latin word devotio.  We have a form of that word in today’s Collect.  There must be a connection between the concepts of familia, pietas and devota, an adjective connected with familia.

Your L&S reveals that devoto “to dedicate, devote” as well as “to bewitch, enchant” and, in a related sense, “to invoke with vows”, and by logical extension it comes to mean “to curse”, though clearly today’s use doesn’t bear that connotation.  In the French source for liturgical Latin we call Blaise/Dumas, we find that the adjective devotus, a, um has a specially connection to devotion to service of the Lord.

We can also draw insight into what is really being said here by bringing in the force of devotio, an obvious derivative.  In classical usage devotio is “fealty, allegiance, devotedness; piety, devotion, zeal.” Devotio also means, as devoto implied, “a cursing, curse, imprecation, execration, a magical formula, incantation, spell.” That is not our direction today!

Briefly, I hear devotio as “a devotion to duty”.  In that sense it picks up the meaning of pietas. Our “devotion” leads us to keep God’s commandments and attend with focus to the duties of our state before all else.  If we are truly devout, pious, in respect to God, devoted to fulfilling the duties of our state in life truly is here and now, then God will give us every actual grace we need to fulfill our vocations. We are, in effect, fulfilling our proper role in His great plan and thus He is sure to help us.   God fulfills what He promises to us as we do our part in His plan in which He gave us a role from before the creation of the universe.

ICEL (1973 translation of the 1970MR):
Father,
watch over your family
and keep us safe in your care,
for all our hope is in you.

LITERAL TRANSLATION:
Guard your family, we beseech you, O Lord,
with continual mercy,
so that that (family) may be free from all adversities
as You are protecting it,
and in good acts may be devoted in Your Name.

This prayer speaks first of all to how interconnected we are as Catholic Christians.

By baptism, we are the adopted children of the Father.  We look to Him with the reverence of children, not merely as cowering slaves.  We belong to a family.  In the arc of our lives we have roles and states to fulfill.  Within the Church we have our manner of participation.

We are all in this together.  My strengths support yours.  My sins weaken us all.  My defeats become your concern. All our triumphs are shared as we raise them up to God.

In remembering our common bonds with each other in the Father, we must also remember a profound inequality in our bonds – children are no less members of the family than parents, but they are dependent they are not the equals of their parents.

God is not our peer.  We are not His equal.  We are all children before His gaze.

As I said at the top, I am amused and horrified when liberals suggest that modern man is so sophisticated now that we no longer have to kneel before God as if He were… I don’t… a Lord or something.  God is pretty lucky, after all, that we came.

Our prayer gives us an image that runs very much contrary to the prevailing values of the last few decades, a period in which the family as a coherent recognizable unit has been systematically broken down.

Our Latin prayers also often reflect the Church’s profound awareness of our lack of equality with God.

The prayers are radically hierarchical, just as God’s design reveals hierarchy and order.

The prayers are imbued with reverential love, awe.

Compare this attitude with prevailing societal norms.

Posted in WDTPRS |
7 Comments

Anglican Bishop announces intention to use Anglicanorum coetibus. Fr. Z rants.

I was remiss in not posting about this before, but the lovely and persistent Anna Arco of The Catholic Herald posted that the Anglican Bishop of London, … well.. here it is…

The Anglican bishop of Fulham and the chairman of Forward in Faith International has announced he will resign before the end of the year to join an Ordinariate.

Speaking at Forward in Faith’s National Assembly today, Bishop John Broadhurst, who is a senior figure in the Anglo-Catholic movement, said he intended to tender his resignation before the end of the year and join the Ordinariate in Britain when it is established. He has said that he will remain the chairman of Forward in Faith, which he says is not an Anglican organisation.

Bishop Broadhurst is a suffragan bishop of the Diocese of London. He said the Bishop of London would likely appoint someone new to fill the post Bishop Broadhurst is vacating.

He is the first senior Anglo-Catholic to announce publicly that he will join an Ordinariate when it is founded.

[…]

Pope Benedict is the Pope of Christian Unity.

In the meantime, many disgruntled Catholics are on pins and needles waiting for the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams to issue the long-expected Romanorum coetibus, which will give a safe-haven to liberals who want to keep their large puppets and pottery, 60’s music and the ordination of women, prayer to the earthmothergoddess… all without the spirit-repressing domination of masculine Rome!

“But Father! But Father!”, you might be saying with furrowed brow.  “Who, pray tell, should go over to them?  Do you have anyone in mind?”

Since I am in Detroit at the time of this writing, I suggest all the Call To Action types and those associated liberal confab Archbp. Vigneron warned against the other day… and all their speakers… should just go. The folks who are determined to poison reception of the new translation should think over carefully which Church they truly desire to belong to.   99% of the writers of the NCR.   There is hope for some of them, however.  Nearly all the members of the LCWR and CHA could join the wymynpryst types who should immediately get out.  Remember girls! There is a safe haven for all of you! It’s such a small step.   Since I am on it… the dissidents fighting against Archbp. Nienstedt in St. Paul and Minneapolis and against all the Minnesota bishops who are sticking up for true marriage, according to God’s will revealed in nature and in revelation.  Hasta la vista.

This is not an invitation for you to add your own names.  I am ranting.

See what a few hours in Detroit has done to me already?  I am all worked up!  Back to the situation in England…

Damian has this and this.  His Hermeneuticalness has this.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Pope of Christian Unity, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged
21 Comments

DETROIT: Sunday 17 Oct – Solemn TLM at Assumption Grotto

This morning I picked up my impedimenta and moved the castra from Manhattan to Detroit.  What’s the old saw?   I just flew in and, boy, are my arms tired.

Tomorrow, Sunday 17 Oct at 12 Noon at Assumption Grotto parish in Detroit there will be a Solemn TLM (Extraordinary Form).  The setting of the Mass is by Igor Stravinsky.   I, the undersigned, will be celebrant for the Mass and I will preach.

Assumption Grotto’s annual benefit dinner is also tomorrow after the Mass.  See their site for details.  I hear there is a raffle.  Shall I win?

I am eager to hearing the Stravinsky Mass in the setting for which it was intended!  It was written to be a Mass and not a concert piece.

Additional music for the Mass will be by J.S. Bach.   That’s not a contrast, is it?

Stravinsky was Orthodox but effectively Catholic in spirit.  He wrote his Mass setting from real piety and not for a commission.  I was told a story by Fr. Perrone that when Stravinsky was at a concert of his music in the 1970’s in Los Angeles, in the old cathedral, whereas everyone was yaking it up in church as in a concert hall, the elderly Stravinsky genuflected to the Lord in the tabernacle when he would pass by.

PS: No gunfire yet.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

“beige Catholicism”… inculturation…

On this blog and in print I have often made a distinction about inculturation.

Inculturation is inevitable and necessary and a nature dynamic of who we are as Catholic Christians.  But inculturation must be properly understood and applied.

There is a two-way street between the influence of the world on the Church and the Church on the world.  It is always going on and always will and always must.  But where modern inculturation has gone dreadfully, tragically, destructively wrong, is that all too often what the world has to give to the Church has been given logical priority over what the Church has to give to the world.

The process of the exchange is chronologically simultaneously , but the Church must have logical priority.

The Church shaped cultures.  Those cultures gave things to the Church, which reshaped them and gave them back, which resulted in more exchanges yet.  Modern inculturation stiffed the healthy process in favor of one in which the world, especially the immanent was given priority.

I see that Fr. Ray Blake of St. Mary Magdalen in Brighton has linked to a piece about inculturation by Fr. Robert Barron on “beige Catholicism”.

On a side note, many of the offices of the Vatican were redone during the time of the reign of Paul VI.  They were painted in what some called “Paul VI beige”.

Posted in New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
16 Comments

Anscar Chupungco, wrong about relics

From our friends at Rorate, more information about just how wrong liturgist Anscar Chupungco, OSB really is.  My emphases.

Veneration of relics is “a sad chapter in the history of the liturgy”

From Anscar Chupungco’s What, Then, is Liturgy?: Musings and Memoir, Claretian Publications, Quezon City 2010, pp. 51-52:

The veneration of the bodies or relics of saints is a sad chapter in the history of the liturgy. In the Middle Ages dealers made a big business out of the sale of bones purportedly of saints but later discovered, thanks to modern technology, to be of animals. Unsuspecting devotees brought them and built magnificent chapels to house richly Italicadorned reliquaries. When I was a student in Europe it was one of my diversions to look for some of the most amusing kinds of relics: a feather of St. Michael the Archangel, a piece of cloth stained with the milk of the Blessed Virgin, one of the prepuces of the Child Jesus, and believe it or not, a bottle containing the darkness of Egypt! The great reformer Martin Luther, appalled by aberrations committed on relics, fiercely took issue with the Catholic Church. Indeed, who would not be scandalized by reports that when priests were compelled to celebrate only one Mass a day to stifle the abuses surrounding Mass stipends, some had the temerity to simulate the Mass and raise the relic of a saint at the supposed moment of consecration? I can still hear my mentor Adrian Nocent’s dismissive remark when he listened to stories of relics, private apparitions, and saccharine devotions: “It’s another religion!”

Abstracting from the deviations of the past and from the odd practice of displaying dismembered parts of the bodies of saints for public veneration, it is important to keep in mind that the liturgy gives special honor to the human body, whether it is of a great saint or a departed ordinary Christian…

Adrian Nocent OSB was one of the leading lights of the liturgical reform of the 1960’s.

First, the abuse of something doesn’t obliterate the things proper use.  Just because there were excesses or abuses in some period, that doesn’t mean that relics cannot be venerated properly.

Also, the writer undermines his own argument.  He states that we give special honor to the human body… um …. exactly.

Finally, the writer seems to ignore that people have venerated the bodies of dead heros for a lot longer than Christianity has been around.  People know in their bones that their bones are important, even when we are not at the moment actually using them. The followers of John the Baptist obtained John’s body.  The Lord’s Body, taken down from the Cross, was treated with tenderness. The earliest Christians treated the bodies of their dead, especially martyrs, with reverence.   They built their altars over or close to the graves of their great holy brothers and sisters.  Relics inspired not only excesses or abuses – which I would remind the writer came from being sinful, the desire to cheat or deceive – but also deep and lasting piety that lead to emulation of the holiness of our forebears.

But it may be that Chupungco, in his desire to affirm the present, the ephemeral in local cultures, has no interest in that which ties us to the past.  Relics certainly tie us to the past.  Relics are countercultural.  That is not what someone totally dedicated to liturgical “inculturation” would want at work.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged
26 Comments

New director of the Sistine Chapel Choir

This looooong overdue.   It is hard to understand what took Pope Benedict so long to take this important step for the improvement of papal liturgies in St. Peter’s Basilica.

Fr. Massimo Palombella was appointed as the director of the Sistine Chapel Choir.   I will henceforth suspend my automatic application of the epithet “Sistine Screamers” until we have an suitable period of time to hear them improve.  We also look forward to an improvement in the choice of settings for Mass as well as the quality of the singing.

From VIS:

NOMINA DEL MAESTRO DIRETTORE DELLA CAPPELLA MUSICALE PONTIFICIA DENOMINATA “CAPPELLA SISTINA”

Il Santo Padre ha nominato Maestro Direttore della Cappella Musicale Pontificia, denominata “Cappella Sistina” il Rev.do Don Massimo Palombella, S.D.B., Docente presso la Pontificia Università Salesiana, Fondatore e Direttore del Coro Interuniversitario di Roma.

Rev.do Don Massimo Palombella, S.D.B.

Il Rev.do Don Massimo Palombella, S.D.B., [Some people think that SDB means Società Salesiana di San Giovanni Bosco.  It really means “Socio di Bertone… colleague of (Card.) Bertone”] è nato a Torino il 25 dicembre 1967. E’ stato ordinato Sacerdote per la Congregazione Salesiana il 7 settembre 1996.

Ha compiuto gli studi di filosofia e teologia, conseguendo il Dottorato di Ricerca in Teologia Dogmatica, e gli studi musicali con i Maestri Luigi Molfino, Valentín Miserachs Grau, [who has good ideas about sacred music] Gabriele Arrigo e Alessandro Ruo Rui, diplomandosi in Musica Corale e Composizione.

Fondatore e Maestro Direttore del Coro Interuniversitario di Roma, lavora nella pastorale universitaria della Diocesi di Roma dal 1995.

[…]

Last year Fr. Palombella’s inter-university choir sang for the academic year’s opening at my school, the Augustinianum. They’ve got game.

Posted in Brick by Brick | Tagged , ,
11 Comments

Wherein Fr. Z asks a question, directed especially at bishops.

Under another entry, in a comment, a participant here raised an interesting question.

Many of us Latin Mass attendees have boys who also have affection for the “Beauty” of the Latin Mass … , and many of these young men are interested in the priesthood. It sure is sad that this fact is ignored in many of the places / dioceses where priests are needed most.

I wonder what would happen … what would happen with vocations … if a bishop, with a seminary or without, made it crystal clear that he (and the seminary) were going to make sure that every man was trained also in the older, traditional, Extraordinary form of Mass and he intended to support every priest who desired – cum serena pace – to celebrate that form in parishes.

Imagine an ad campaign from the diocese, the bishop speaking of this in talks about vocations and at parishes, writing in the diocesan paper, going to visit the seminarians in support, using the older form himself with generosity even if it is not his preference?

After all, a large percentage of priests and parishioners deal with liturgy that is not their preference all the time.

What would happen to the number of men applying for seminary?

We can get all dreamy about this, of course.   Some older people and most liberals would simply freak out.  They freak out anyway.  Sure there would be some spittle-flecked dudgeon here and there.   But consider the sort of person who would flare up like that about something both legitimate and sacred and the wave of the future anyway.

Who in the long run, Your Excellencies, will go to the wall for you when you are standing in the line of fire.  I submit that that would be traditionally-minded priests, not liberals.

I suspect many men would come out of the woodwork.  Good men, who otherwise might be thinking about going somewhere else to pursue priesthood.  People in the pews?  Remember those polls about what people would think about having the old Mass in their parishes?

Your Excellencies… before you click away, look at surveys about support for the old Mass in parishes. (Here and here.)

I wonder what … would … happen?   Do you?

Posted in Brick by Brick, I'm just askin'..., New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices |
38 Comments