Wholly Ours

In a conversation with a friend today it became clearer and clearer to me how the Second Vatican Council’s document on liturgy, Sacrosanctum Concilium, is entirely the property of … on the side of the traditional/conversative argument.

The usual narrative which has predominated over the last decades is that Sacrosanctum Concilium is the driving force behind liberal reforms.

Sacrosanctum Concilium is a conservative document which was hijacked.

It is wholly ours.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA, The Drill | Tagged
116 Comments

Where you are

I did a quick snapshot of some of the places you are when you come to visit WDTPRS.

I cut out the "unknown" and entries that were too vague, such as "Canada" or "Germany".

These are approximations of locations in many cases.

Metairie, Louisiana
Tallahassee, Florida
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Kawasaki, Kanagawa
Makati, Rizal
Brentwood, Essex
New Orleans, Louisiana
Perth, Western Australia
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Raynham Center, Massach…
Denver, Colorado
Cincinnati, Ohio
Mobile, Alabama
Toronto, Ontario
Washington, District of…
Hopeland, Pennsylvania
Adelaide, South Australia
West Babylon, New York
Oxford, Oxfordshire
Gastonia, North Carolina
Phoenix, Arizona
Washington, District of…
Harrisville, Rhode Island
Miami, Florida
Monroe, Louisiana
Charlottesville, Virginia
Singapore
Clifton Springs, New York
Clementon, New Jersey
Kitty Hawk, North Carol…
New York
Mountain View, California
Warsaw, Warszawa
Madrid
Lexington, Virginia
Grand Rapids, Michigan
East Providence, Rhode …
Shirley, Indiana
Chesterfield, Missouri
Picayune, Mississippi
Baltimore, Maryland
Ternitz, Niederosterreich
Collegeville, Pennsylva…
Hinsdale, Illinois
Shreveport, Louisiana
Des Moines, Iowa
Patchogue, New York
West Bridgewater, Massa…
Alexandria, Virginia
Braslia, Distrito Federal
Ottawa, Ontario
Buffalo, New York
Richmond, Kentucky
Rochester, New York
Warren, Michigan
Kalamazoo, Michigan
Philadelphia, Pennsylva…
Loughton, Essex
Stockholm, Stockholms Lan
Raleigh, North Carolina
Shakopee, Minnesota
Franklin Park, Illinois
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Spring, Texas
Winona, Minnesota
Long Beach, California
Otisville, New York
Barcelona, Cataluna
Manchester

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
87 Comments

What is your good news?

Have any good news for us today?

I was able to spend some time with friends in KC, MO, meet with Bp. Finn, and help a priest friend by taking one of his four Sunday Masses.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
50 Comments

REVIEW: Mystic Monk Coffee

was so impressed by the proposed plans for the new Carmelite Monastery in Wyoming, that I decided to check out Mystic Monk Coffee and help them peddle some.

Pounds and Grounds and Compounds

I developed a strong interest in good coffee when, for a few years, I had a job in a coffee/tea store long before the invasion of Starbucks and Caribou was spotted on the horizon.  We designed our own blends and roasted our own beans.

I am in Kansas City, visiting a friend, who purchased some varieties of Mystic Monk Coffee.  I have now had a chance to try a few of them.

In my mug right now is Midnight Vigils Blend.

I am favorably impressed.

I prefer a sturdy bean (Sumatra is a favorite) and dark roast.  I like my coffee very strong.

The Mystic Monk does it for me.

I endorse this coffee.  I have decided to change my own coffee drinking patterns. It is competitively priced compared to, say, Starbucks (which I have been been buying), especially when you consider free shipping on their 4 Bag Sampler.

Furthermore, buying coffee from the monks will help the monks.  As a bonus, if you buy it through my link, you will help me as well.

You can buy their coffee HERE and help them build their place while fueling your caffeine addiction.

What’s not to like?

Buy coffee.  Build a monastery.

UPDATE 31 Aug 21:23 GMT

I just saw that you can buy their coffee in larger amounts!

Posted in REVIEWS | Tagged , , ,
Comments Off on REVIEW: Mystic Monk Coffee

WDTPRS: 14th Sunday after Pentecost

Today’s prayer survived the snipping and pasting of the Consilium and the late Rev. Annibale Bugnini’s liturgical experts to be used on Tuesday of the 2nd week of Lent.

COLLECT (1962MR):

Custodi, Domine, quaesumus,
Ecclesiam tuam propitiatione perpetua:
et quia sine te labitur humana mortalitas;
tuis semper auxiliis et abstrahatur a noxiis,
et ad salutaria dirigatur.

Propitiatio, in its fundamental meaning, is “an appeasing, atonement,  propitiation”.  The dictionary of liturgical Latin Blaise/Dumas also gives us a view of the word as “favor”.  This makes sense.  God has been appeased and rendered favorable again towards us sinners by the propitiatory actions Christ fulfilled on the Cross.  We have renewed these through the centuries in Holy Mass.

Mortalitas refers, as you might guess, to the fact that we die, our mortality.  Inherent in the word is the concept that we die in our flesh.  So, you ought also to hear “flesh” when you hear mortalitas

Labitur is from labor.  This is not the substantive labor but the verb, labor, lapsus.  It means, “to glide, fall, to move gently along a smooth surface, to fall, slide”.

Auxilium, in the plural, has a military overtone.  There is also a medical undertone too, “an antidote, remedy, in the most extended sense of the word”.  Pair this up with noxius, a, um, which points at things which are injurious or harmful.  There is a moral element as well or “a fault, offence, trespass”.

Salutaria is the plural of neuter salutare which looks like an infinitive but isn’t.  Our constant companion the Lewis & Short Dictionary says the neuter substantive salutare is “salvation, deliverance, health” in later Latin.  The adjectival form, salutaris, is “of or belonging to well-being, healthful, wholesome”.  Think of English “salutary” and O salutaris hostia in the Eucharistic hymn by St. Thomas Aquinas (+1274). 

When this word is in the neuter plural (salutaria) there is a phrase in Latin bibere salutaria alicui … to drink one’s health” or literally “to drink healths to someone”.  In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet during the famous “Queen Mab” speech Mercutio declares that a soldier dreams, inter alia, of “healths five fathom deep,” (I, iv) and in Henry VIII  the King says to Cardinal Wolsey, “I have half a dozen healths to drink to these” (I, iv).

Wine and health are closely related in the ancient world. In the parable of the Good Samaritan the good passerby pours oil and wine into the wounds of the man who was assaulted (Luke 10:25-37). St. Paul wrote to St. Timothy: “No longer drink only water, but take a little wine for the sake of your stomach and your frequent ailments” (1 Tim 5:23). 

Apart from its resemblance to blood, it is no surprise that Christ should choose this healthful daily staple as the matter of our saving Sacrament. 

Wine was often safer to drink than water in the ancient world, though it was nearly always mixed with water to some extent. To drink uncut wine, merum in Latin (from the adjective merus “unadulterated”, giving us the English word “mere”) was considered barbaric. Cicero (+43 BC) and others hurled that accusation at Marcus Antonius (+31 BC) who was a renowned merum swiller.

Catholics sing the word merum in the hymn of the Holy Thursday liturgy, Pange lingua gloriosi, by St. Thomas Aquinas: “fitque sanguis Christi merum… and the wine becomes the Blood of Christ”. In sacramental terms, there is a link between wine and health in the sense of salvation. During Holy Mass, we offer gifts of wine with water to become our spiritual “healths” once it is changed into the Blood of Christ. These archaic and literary references help us drill into the language of our prayers.

Let’s drill some more.  Did you know that the index finger was called digitus salutaris, and that the ancient Romans held it up when greeting people? We don’t do that very often these days.  I believe modern usage, at least on roadways, more commonly employs a different finger. The special designations of fingers in Latin are pollex (thumb); index or salutaris (forefinger); medius, infamis or impudicus (middle finger); minimo proximus or medicinalis (ring finger); minimus (little finger, “pinky”).  The priest, during Mass, always held the consecrated Host only between his thumb and the digitus salutaris.  One way to harm a priest, our mediator at the altar and in the confessional, was to chop off his index fingers.  Priests were forbidden to say Mass without special permission from the Holy See and those fingers were clearly understood by those who hate the Church, priesthood, and the Eucharist as being especially important. 

Let’s push this a little more. 

The adjective medicinalis, “medicinal, healing”, comes from the verb medeor or medico, the original meaning of which has to do with “to heal” by magic. The verb traces back to the stem med– or “middle”.  So, medicus, “doctor” is associated with “mediator”.  We can think of this in terms of the English word “medium”, who is a mediator with the spirit world.  The Latin poet Silius Italicus (Tiberius Catius Asconius Silius Italicus +101) called magicians medicum vulgus (Punica, III, 300). The ancients saw what we call the “ring finger” as having magical powers.  This is reflected in the name digitus medicinalis, the “medicinal/magic” finger.

One of the most important Patristic Christological images in the ancient Church is Christus Medicus, the “Physician”. St. Augustine does amazing things with this image, and Christus Mediator.  He is the doctor of the ailing soul.  He is the only mediator between God and man.   

LITERAL TRANSLATION:
Guard your Church, we beseech You, O Lord,
with perpetual favor,
and since without You our mortal flesh slides toward ruin
by means of your helping remedies let it be pulled back from injuries
and be guided unto saving healths.

We all know the image of the slippery slope.  Once you are on this slope, scrabble and scratch as you can, you can’t get a purchase. 

You slide and slide, faster and faster. 

Down. 

Our fallen nature and our habitual sins drag us onto the slope from which we cannot save ourselves.  In the sacraments and teachings of Holy Church, Christ extends the fingers of His saving hand. 

He draws us back from a deadly slide.

Watch how the old incarnation of ICEL ruined the imagery in the lame-duck version we still hear in our churches today.

ICEL (1973 translation of the 1970MR):
Lord, watch over your Church,
and guide it with your unfailing love.
Protect us from what could harm us
and lead us to what will save us.
Help us always, for without you we are bound to fail.

There are different ways to do this, but I wanted to place in evidence the image of health and the flesh and medicine.

Posted in WDTPRS |
6 Comments

QUAERITUR: In the USA is it against the law to kneel for Communion?

From a reader:

I know this may seem a bit odd, but  I was hoping to get your perspective on the U.S. GIRM 160, which states:  "The norm for reception of holy Communion in the dioceses of the United States is standing. Communicants should not be denied holy Communion because they kneel. Rather, such instances should be addressed pastorally, by providing the faithful with proper catechesis on the reasons for this norm."
 
There are people, including the popular and much visited website, Catholic Answers who have spoken that kneeling for communion is inappropriate as it goes against the norm in the United States, and that one is disobedient if one still chooses to kneel even after having been "pastorally" corrected as to the proper norm in the country. 

Can you provide further clarification according to your knowledge as to whether or not it is "licit" for one to kneel in the U.S. even though it may not be the U.S. norm, and whether or not one is disobedient after being "pastorally" corrected according to U.S. GIRM 160.

Since this veered into the technical, I consulted a canon lawyer before answering.  I will adapt his response with my own.

Part of a response must involve what "norm" means.  I admit that I use the term "norm" rather loosely when writing and talking, and often morph it into "laws", and vice versa.

A norm is not the same as a law.

The "norm" for the U.S., in accordance with GIRM 160, is that communicants stand when receiving Holy Communion.

One thing we have learned from post-modernists, is also to read a text for what it doesn’t say.  GIRM 160 doesn’t say, "In the United States, Holy Communion must be received while standing."   That would be a disciplinary liturgical law.   It would require a dispensation to do something different (i.e., to kneel).

Rather, GIRM 160 in the USA is a norm.   That is to say it points to a normative thing, the usual practice, the custom.  In 25 years we can have a discussion on what legal force this custom has, but now is not the time.  

What the U.S. bishops did in including this norm, with the approval of the Holy See, is state that the normal manner of receiving Holy Communion, in the United States, is standing.   The usual way… it is customary now.

The addition of the second statement (communicants "should not be denied Holy Communion because they kneel") shows that the norm is not some sort of enforceable law.

The situation is to be addressed "pastorally", with explanations, catechesis, etc.  Once people have been provided with this, if they chose to continue to kneel they are not being disobedient. They do not do something illicit.  They have chosen to follow a practice that differs from the norm.  That does not violate a law.

Moreover, whereas a Fr. M might go to lengths to explain that the "reasons for the norm" are excellent because, after all, we members of the Resurrection people (whose name is Alleluia) are all grown up now as modern men and women and, no longer cling to out-dated oppressive hierarchical and patriarchal, Eurocentric feudal habits we therefore must stand in self-affirmation, a Fr. Z might describe the "reasons for the norm" otherwise, and add that we miserable sinners know that we are unworthy to approach the ineffable gift won for us in the bloody Sacrifice of Calvary, and, humbly recognizing the need for a Savior, therefore appropriately kneel in the presence of the Almighty GOD.

It’s all a matter of pastoral nuance.

It is not proper to accuse someone who kneels of being disobedient. 

One could go into various digressions about whether people who kneel when everyone else is standing are really just drawing attention to themselves.  Are they perhaps creating a traffic problem?

My favorite objection, by the way, is "Someone might trip over their legs!"

I will turn this around and argue that, for insurance purposes, there should not be a dangerous chow line approach with the potential of hazardous legs unexpectedly thrown in front of the unsuspecting.  Far better, and safer for insurance purposes – as well as charity and common sense – would be to spread out the communicants in a line, say parallel to the edge of the sanctuary, perhaps even where the nave and sanctuary come together.  There people could kneel and not be obstacles.  Furthermore, again for insurance purposes and charity and common sense, perhaps there could be a low supporting structure along that line across the sanctuary where people might kneel.  This low supporting structure could at once have a theological purpose pointing to the area of the nave where the baptized – according to their own dignity – have a place that the priest will not often confuse with his own place, but it could also have a practical purpose, giving older people an aid for kneeling and rising with greater ease.

I don’t know… maybe someone could figure out how that might work, what that low supporting structure might look like, etc.  It might need, come to think of it, some sort of gate to permit entrance to the sanctuary. 

We have to be practical.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , , ,
97 Comments

If you live long enough…

… you’ll see just about everything.

Brick by brick.

I have nothing else worthwhile to add to that.

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9_RZQ3GLmI]

Posted in Parody Songs |
93 Comments

QUAERITUR: important kitchen tools

Here is a change of pace.

A reader recently asked me about necessary cooking tools.

Among the several things which more obvious, good bowls are essential. Sturdy, heat resistant and in different sizes.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
25 Comments

Bl. Teresa of Calcutta saved Card. Comastri’s priesthood

From CNA with my emphases:

Cardinal Comastri recounts how Mother Teresa saved his priesthood

Rome, Italy, Aug 26, 2010 / 05:46 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The Archpriest of St. Peter’s Basilica remembered at Mass on Thursday how a promise he made to Mother Teresa 40 years ago preserved his vocation. She taught him that without prayer, charity cannot exist.

Cardinal Comastri presided over the Eucharistic celebration at Rome’s San Lorenzo in Damaso Church, which had a very welcoming feel with the presence of more than 100 Missionaries of Charity sisters, over 20 concelebrating priests, local government leaders and a very diverse collection of faithful.

Church-goers were pleasantly surprised by the presence of newly-arrived prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, Cardinal Marc Ouellet, who also concelebrated and read a message from the Pope at the beginning of Mass.

In a homily which emphasized that love is the foundation of our existence, Cardinal Comastri remembered a personal encounter he had with the Missionaries of Charity’s founder when he was just a young priest.

His first contact with Mother Teresa came when he mailed her a letter just after he was ordained a priest. Her "unexpected" response was especially striking, he recalled, because it was written on "very poor paper, in a very poor envelope."

At a later date, Cardinal Comastri sought her out when she was visiting Rome to thank her for the answer. When he found her, she asked him a question that left him "a little embarrassed."

"How many hours do you pray a day?" she asked.

In 1969-70, he recalled, the Church was in a time of "dispute," so thinking that it was "near heroism, then-Father Comastri explained to her that he said daily Mass in addition to praying the Liturgy of the Hours and the Rosary.”

To this, she responded flatly, "That’s not enough.

"Love cannot be lived minimally," she said, and then asked him to promise to do half an hour of adoration every day.

"I promised," said Cardinal Comastri, "and today I can say that this saved my priesthood."

Trying to defend his case at the time, he told Mother Teresa that he thought she was going to ask him how much charity he did. She answered him, "And do you think if I didn’t pray I would be able to love the poor? It’s Jesus that puts love in my heart when I pray."

She helped the poor, but it was "always Jesus’ love," the saintly sister told him.

Then, Mother told him something that he would never forget: she told him to read Scripture.

Through Jesus’ teachings, she said, we are reminded that "without God we’re too poor to help the poor.” This, she explained, "is why so much assistance falls into the void. It doesn’t change anything, it doesn’t contribute anything because it doesn’t bring love and it isn’t born of prayer."

Concluding, Cardinal Comastri said, "Through this little woman … we are reminded that charity is the apostolate of the Church and that charity is only born if we pray."

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

Anyone having internet problems today?

Earlier today, on and off, I had some real problems with use of the internet.  Some sites wouldn’t load, and others would.  I had particular problems with loading anything from a Google search.

Did you have this experience?  Did something happen out there?

BTW: I heard that a trans-Atlantic cable was severed some weeks ago and repaired.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
24 Comments