Jurassic Liberal Park

I could add a great deal more, and in rather strong language, to the observations made already over at Creative Minority Report.

When you watch this through, I think you will pretty much conclude that this old feller is perhaps less of heretic than he is of being not a very bright old liberal.

Wow. This is truly unbelievable.

This is a video by the Rev. Joseph Patrick Breen, pastor of St. Edward’s Catholic Church in Nashville TN. This video is posted by the pastor on the parish website.

In this video Fr. Breen, as communicated to us by a reader commits multiple counts of video heresy and hits most of the heretical bases.

Women’s ordination – Check!
Reversal of the Church’s teaching on artificial contraception – Check!
Divorce – Check!

He then goes on to slam (married) former Protestant clergy who convert and are ordained Catholic clergy,

He shows open disdain and insults the Pope, the Roman Curia, today’s bishops, today’s seminarians. About the seminarians he says they are intellectually inferior to those of yesteryear and are probably from dysfunctional families.

And there is even more! Watch!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
72 Comments

Prayer Request

Will you please pray for an important intention?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
21 Comments

That Canon Law Conference

I wrote before about the Canon Law conference I attended at the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe south of La Crosse, WI.

First, do visit that Shrine.  It is amazing.

Second, here is a quick shot of three bloggers, Dr. Edward Peters of In the Light of the Law, Fr. John Boyle of Caritas in Veritate, and the undersigned.

That Canon Law Conference

I promise you… it’s not that I am that short.  It is that these guys are so tall!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
28 Comments

Division in the pews!

There is a workshop going in Milwaukee, WI sponsored by the USCCB-FLDC about the implementation of the new English translation of the Roman Missal.

There in article about this workshop in Journal Sentinel.  There is not much in this article of great interest, but a few things popped out at me.  Thus, I edit and add my emphases and comments:

Clergy to convene, discuss Catholic missal changes
Priests concerned about alterations in midst of other church issues

By Annysa Johnson of the Journal Sentinel

Posted: Aug. 5, 2010

[]

The new translation introduces more formal, rarefied language into the liturgy. But Cooper and others who have studied drafts say it ignores English grammar and syntax and introduces terms – "consubstantial," "oblation," "ignominy," to mention a few – unfamiliar to many American Catholics. And some worry it will sow division in the pews.  [Right!  I can see it now.  Fights will break out in the pews when the Creed is recited.  People will hang their heads in shame and weep.  Some will rend their garments.  "Consubstantial!"  But I suppose we will have the opportunity to relive the experience of the early Church, when there were riots over changes to the words of Scripture or liturgy.  There were great Fathers of the Church who experienced exile over "consubstantial".  I am unaware that anyone went to the mat for something like "one in being with the Father"… whatever that means.]

[…]

"Much of the music that has come up over the last 30 years will no longer be useable," [Picture me in my grief.   Is there a better reason than this single point for the implementation of the new translation?] said Father Alan Jurkus of St. Alphonsus Parish in Greendale, who sent out a letter this month notifying members of the coming changes. 

[…]

"The bottom line for me is why. Why, with everything else that’s going on in the church, do we have to rub salt in the wounds?"  [Could it be that weak liturgy created the environment in which our "problems" have run rampant?]

[…]

Posted in Brick by Brick, SESSIUNCULA, The Drill | Tagged
147 Comments

50K young people at Wednesday General Audience

From CNA:

More than 50,000 altar servers on Rome pilgrimage learn communion of faith

50K young people at Wednesday General AudienceThe pilgrimage that brought altar boys and girls [sic] to Rome en masse this week concluded on a high note at Wednesday’s general audience. Bringing tens of thousands of young people together in what appeared to be a small scale World Youth Day, the event showed the true colors of Church and the communion of its youth.

The final tally of participants included well over 50,000 young people from at least 17 European countries, who took over St. Peter’s Square during the general audience with the Pope. The altar servers were seen dancing, singing and generally enjoying the culminating event of their pilgrimage to Rome, organized by the Coetus Internationalis Ministrantium (CIM).

Youth from each country represented were distinguishable by the color of their pilgrims’ scarves. By far, the dominant shade seen in the square and all over the city in the last three days was the German participants’ vanilla-colored garment, one of which CIM president Bishop Martin Gächter offered to Pope Benedict XVI during the audience.

Austrian pilgrims with their yellow scarves were the second-most visible, while the 18 Lithuanians in pink and the six Albanians wearing blue were a much rarer sight among the over 80,000 total audience attendees.

More than 25,000 people who were not directly involved in the pilgrimage were also there to be with the Pope for a little over an hour.

Flags from Europe and many other countries waved ceaselessly during the audience, which was described in the context of the greater pilgrimage by L’Osservatore Romano editor Gian Vian as an "extraordinary Catholic party."

The colorful and happy gathering resembled the World Youth Day 2010 celebration Benedict XVI hosted in the square last March that drew 70,000 young people.

Many in the media have referred to the greater meaning of the event amidst Church scandals, as proof that the Catholic Church is strong, however, Bishop Gächter, in his words to Pope Benedict at the beginning of the audience, commented on the meaning of the pilgrimage through the eyes of the youth.

He said simply, "Here in Rome, we have learned to better know our communion of faith," a reality witnessed these days on the streets of the city.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Lighter fare, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
12 Comments

Does Speaker Pelosi’s hypocrisy have no limit?

Does the Speaker’s hypocrisy have no limit?

From CNA:

Speaker Pelosi avoids question about unborn Jesus’ right to life

Washington D.C., Aug 5, 2010 / 06:10 am (CNA).- Citing her previous references to the Incarnation, a journalist recently asked legal abortion supporter House Speaker [Catholic] Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) at what point she believes Jesus acquired the right to life. However, she declined to answer the question, saying she’d rather talk about the subject “in church.”

At a July 29 press briefing a reporter with CNSNews.com noted her remarks at the Catholic Community Conference on Capitol Hill, where she said that her favorite word was “the Word, as in the word made flesh.”  [READ THIS. Did the Speaker think people would forget?]

At the May 6 conference, Pelosi told her audience “you know the Gospel reference of the Word.” She added that people have to give voice to “what that means in terms of public policy that would be in keeping with the values of the Word.”

She cited the Prologue to the Gospel of John’s description of Jesus Christ, “the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us.”

At last week’s press briefing CNSNews.com reporter Jane McGrath asked: “So, when was the Word made flesh? Was it at the Annunciation, when Jesus was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit, as the Creed says, or was it at the Nativity when he was born of the Virgin Mary? And when did the Word get the right to life?”

Speaker Pelosi, a self-described Catholic, replied: “Whenever it was, we bow our heads when we talk about it in church, and that’s where I’d like to talk about that.”  [I think the Speaker has forgotten that St. Paul forbids women to speak in church. And what was that point the Lord made about…. what was it again… something about tepid….  There was that other thing too… if I could only recall… something about denying me and denying you.  Gosh.  Gotta look that up.]

CNSNews.com reports that it sought clarification from Speaker Pelosi’s press secretary Nadeam Elshami, asking in an e-mail what the speaker’s position is on the question “Did Jesus have the right to life from the moment of conception?”

Elshami replied in an e-mail “The speaker answered the question. Thanks.”  [No.  The Speaker did NOT answer that question.   I think we should keep asking until she does.]

The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that the Son of God assumed humanity and “made it his own, from his conception.” The Church also recognizes that the child has the right to life “from its conception.”

Speaker Pelosi favors legalized abortion and voted against a ban on partial-birth abortion.

WDTPRS applauds the journalists who put these questions to the Speaker.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
32 Comments

Concerning matters of taste

Here is a fun piece via the Laudator:

R.S. Thomas, Taste:

I had preferred Chaucer
but for the slop in his saucer:

or grave Edmund Spenser
moving formally as a dancer.

But Shakespeare’s cut and thrust,
I allow you, was a must

on my bookshelves; and after,
Donne’s thin, cerebral laughter.

Dryden I could not abide,
nor the mincing fratricide

of Pope. Jonathan Swift,
though courageous, had no uplift.

But Wordsworth, looking in the lake
of his mind, him I could take;

and Percy Shelley at times;
Byron, too, but only for his rhymes.

Tennyson? Browning? If I mention
them, it is but from convention,

despite the vowel technique
of the one, the other’s moral cheek.

Then Hardy, for many a major
poet, is for me just an old-stager,

shuffling about a bogus heath
cobwebbed with his Victorian breath.

And coming to my own century
with its critics’ compulsive hurry

to place a poet, I must smile
at the congestion at the turnstile

of fame, the faceless, formless amoeba
with the secretion of its vers libre.

Posted in Lighter fare |
3 Comments

Conference news

I will have some great photos coming from the conference, but I don’t think I brought the doohickey I need to transfer them to my computer.

This was an amazing canon law conference at the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe south of La Crosse, WI. 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on Conference news

QUAERITUR: confessing sins in both number and kind

From an older response.

A reader asked:

I’ve often heard priests say that when going to confession it’s important to confess sin both in kind and number. I recently went to confession though to a priest who told me at the beginning of the confession that he’s "not the kind of priest who wants to hear the number or frequency" and just to confess the sin. I didn’t know what to do. This seemed contrary to what the Church teaches and what I’ve been told in the past. Is it official teaching of the Church to confess sin both in kind and number, and if so, where can I find some references to this? How can a priest understand the gravity of the sin if he doesn’t know the frequency?

You are absolutely correct in your understanding that mortal sins are to be confessed, to the best of one’s ability, in both kind and number. This is very important and it is the ordinary way in which we are to make every auricular confession.

Emergencies can be different, but even after the emergency is over, we are still obliged to make a full confession in both kind and number.

In the 1983 Code of Canon Law we read:

Canon 988 – §1. A member of the Christian faithful is obliged to confess in kind and number all serious sins committed after baptism and not yet directly remitted through the keys of the Church nor acknowledged in individual confession, for which one is conscious after diligent examination of conscience.
§2. It is to be recommended to the Christian faithful that venial sins also be confessed.

The Council of Trent stated pretty clearly that

"To obtain the saving remedy of the sacrament of penance, according to the plan of our merciful God, the faithful must confess to a priest each and every grave sin that they remember after a diligent examination of conscience" (cf. sess. XIV de poenitentia cc. 7-8: COD 712).

Remember that each sacrament has both matter and form. The matter of the sacrament of penance is the telling of sins. While we are not obliged to include all sorts of circumstantial information surrounding the sins, we do need to indicate number and/or frequency, by number can change the severity of the sin and indicate to the confessor (and yourself) where your principle problems are.

Sometimes it will happen that your memory is not clear about the number of times you committed a sin. Just do your best, in that case. Even when your memory is faulty, if you do your best the sins you don’t remember or confess (through no fault of your own) are also indirectly remitted.

So, this priest was ABSOLUTELY WRONG to suggest that you do not need to confess sins also in number/frequency. As a matter of fact, he suggested that you violate the Church’s law in this matter. Confession is a matter of spiritual life or death.

You don’t mess around with confession.

Finally, there is nothing so bad that we can do that God cannot forgive. So, confess EVERYTHING!

Let’s mix a few analogies, to get at what a magnificent gift this sacrament is.

The confessional is not the rack. The confessional is a tribunal in which you are at the same time the prosecutor and the accused. The priest acts, in the person of Christ, as judge who exercises God’s loving mercy.

The confessional is an operating table on which our Savior, with your cooperation, acts as the Physician of your soul and heals your ills.  Sometimes that process of healing will have its painful moments.  But the relief at the end is worth any measure of discomfort.

Both these images, though on the surface seemingly stern or intimidating, lead through on the other side to blessed blessed relief.

There is nothing so fine as making a good confession, for it leads to the good reception of Holy Communion in the state of grace.

If you know you are not in the state of grace, don’t receive Holy Communion until you have made your good confession of all you sins in both number and kind.

You need to be in the habit of making a thorough examination of your conscience to be able to do this well.

See my 20 Tips for Making a Good Confession.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , ,
54 Comments

4 August: St. John Vianney

From the 2005 Martyrologium Romanum:

Memoria sancti Ioannis Mariae Vianney, presbyteri, qui, quadraginta amplius annos paroeciae ipsi commissae in vico Ars prope Bellicium in Gallia actuosa praedicatione, oratione et paenitentiae exemplo mirum in modum ministravit et cotidie pueros et adultos catechizans, paenitentes reconcilians atque ardenti caritate e sacra Eucharistia velut e fonte hausta refulgens tantopere provexit, ut longe lateque consilia sua diffunderet et permultos ad Deum sapienter duceret.

 

Translate and discuss!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
15 Comments