ASK FATHER: Am I excommunicated for desecrating the Eucharist?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I have something in mind that has been troubling me. In my past, there has been an incidence where I dropped a host while receiving communion (I used to receive by hand, I no longer do), I may have dropped a crumb or crumbs (I went to a Jesuit college where they used a crumbly bread for the host. The incident was a long time ago and I don’t remember exactly what happened. I vaguely remember seeing the crumb, lowering my hand and then raising it back up once it dawned on me. I don’t remember if I got it or not.), and I vaguely remember once or twice accidentally letting a piece of “chewed” host come out of my mouth (I vaguely remember thinking I had something in my teeth and went to remove it. I don’t think I had malice in my heart to defame the Eucharist, but again, a long time ago and I don’t remember exactly). Did I incur latae sententiae? Help, I feel confused and concerned. I did talk to my priest (a good and holy priest) and he said that my circumstances seemed to not fit canon 1367 CIC. He said he would offer me absolution. Am I being paranoid or is there something I should worry about here.

First, be at ease.  From what you described, you DID NOT incur a censure.   In order to incur a censure you have to have committed a mortal sin and, from what it seems, you didn’t.  I can’t see how you knowingly and willingly violated can. 1367 so as to incur a censure.

I think you might be able to find a little fault in, at the time, a bit of carelessness in consumption of the Host.  Then again, we are human beings and a, say, cough can come suddenly, or a transient pain, etc.   Things happen even when we are being really careful.   But if they are unintentional you didn’t commit a sin and if you didn’t commit a sin, you didn’t incur an automatic censure.

Your story, however, is a great example of why we should, why we must …

  1. eliminate Communion in the hand.
  2. eliminate “substantial’ bread or hosts that are not well made.

 

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Canon Law, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
5 Comments

#ViganoTestimony – THE SEQUEL

At LifeSite we see that Archbp. Viganò has released another statement.

ROME, September 27, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) — Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò has today issued a new extraordinary testimony, responding to Pope Francis’ refusal to answer the charge that he knew of Cardinal Theodore McCarrick’s sexual abuse, yet made McCarrick “one of his principal agents in governing the Church.”

In the four-page document, the former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States also responds to the Pope’s recent homilies which seem to cast himself in the role of Christ and Viganò as the diabolical “Great Accuser.”

“Has Christ perhaps become invisible to his vicar? Perhaps is he being tempted to try to act as a substitute of our only Master and Lord?” Archbishop Viganò asks in the new statement, sent to LifeSiteNews today.

[…]

The PDF is HERE.

Here is a taste from Archbp. Viganò:

[…]

If [the Pope] had said: “Viganò lied,” he would have challenged my credibility while trying to affirm his own. In so doing he would have intensified the demand of the people of God and the world for the documentation needed to determine who has told the truth. Instead, he put in place a subtle slander against me — slander being an offense he has often compared to the gravity of murder. Indeed, he did it repeatedly, in the context of the [short daily St. Martha sermons during] celebration of the most Holy Sacrament, the Eucharist, where he runs no risk of being challenged by journalists. When he did speak to journalists, he asked them to exercise their professional maturity and draw their own conclusions. But how can journalists discover and know the truth if those directly involved with a matter refuse to answer any questions or to release any documents? The pope’s unwillingness to respond to my charges and his deafness to the appeals by the faithful for accountability are hardly consistent with his calls for transparency and bridge building.

Moreover, the pope’s cover-up of McCarrick was clearly not an isolated mistake. Many more instances have recently been documented in the press, showing that Pope Francis has defended homosexual clergy who committed serious sexual abuses against minors or adults. These include his role in the case of Fr. Julio Grassi in Buenos Aires, his reinstatement of Fr. Mauro Inzoli after Pope Benedict had removed him from ministry (until he went to prison, at which point Pope Francis laicized him), and his halting of the investigation of sex abuse allegations against Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor.

[…]

The plot very much thickens as the heat is applied.

Posted in The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
18 Comments

A story about St. Luke’s: “I have seen wonderful moments of grace there; priests and Religious who limped in, who left healed.”

The other day I posted about how bishops have used “psychological evaluation” as a weapon against conservative and traditional priests. At the time I acknowledged that some priests really do need help. Along with the horror stories I have received about “treatment”, I have received more positive stories from priests as well.

Here is one of them.

In fairness we have to hear of these as well.

Dear Father:

As always, I am following your excellent posts, which are such an education to us and such a service to the Church. This might be a useful bit of background.

I am an alumnus of Saint Luke Institute in Silver Spring, MD; my presenting issue was abuse of alcohol. I was vividly aware of the lurid reputation of the place from the Father Peterson days (frankly, and I think you’ll understand this, I was rather pleased to get the chance to see for myself what goes on there!).

The place does an awful lot of good. That there are a strong representation of young conservative clergy is true — but younger priests tend to be conservative (as they understand the Tradition) today. I met really fine, solid, wonderful priests and brothers and nuns who needed a break and to learn to care for themselves. It was a privilege to live with them. I was truly edified. They created among themselves a caring, supportive community; a number of Religious (Brothers and Sisters) told me that they had experienced the deepest level of community life they had ever known. I think that is a tribute to priests and Religious who found themselves in an unexpected place and did the best they could, and did very well.

I saw three problems at Saint Luke which I would mention:

1. The first problem: the abuse of these places by some members of the episcopate is certainly real: I think of one Bishop who seems to send ANY of his priests or deacons there if they get into trouble, and there is no path back: they never get readmitted to ministry, despite promises, regardless of the severity of the problem. It is a treatment center; he uses it to park a problem while he figures out how to get rid of him. I think perhaps he is too distracted by the building of his great vanity project, his Cathedral, and he forgets that each of his priests and deacons are Temples of the Holy Ghost. The sunlight off the crystal must distract him, I suppose.

2. The second is like unto it: you have used the word, “conflict of interest.” There is a fundamental conflict of interest in Saint Luke’s in that the client in the therapy is not the priest or religious; the client is the Diocese or Religious Order. It is paying the bills. It’s not conceivable that decisions made by staff do not take into account the fact that they do not want to hack off the Bishops who pay the bills and decide to send the next client.

2a. I know I said just three problems, but how can I resist this: the Bishops are the fly in the ointment, the bride at every funeral and the corpse at every wake. The turd in the punch bowl…

3. The embrace of the professional counseling standards by Saint Luke is undoubtedly necessary from their point of view. They need to maintain professional standing and accreditation. This is just how we lost our Catholic colleges and universities and seminaries. A priest who, for example, has experienced same-sex attraction, and — probably linked — drug- alcohol- social problems, is counseled from the perspective of, Are you comfortable in your own skin, rather than “Let us look at your same sex attraction from the perspective of the Church’s teaching.” The problem becomes, “are you comfortable with this,” and that does not address the moral issue, nor does it treat of how you live (the ministry, the Religious life, your Christian life) fruitfully.

In other words, the standards St Luke Institute adopts are the professional standards expected by its peers in evaluation. That will always be a problem. But I have seen wonderful moments of grace there; priests and Religious who limped in, who left healed. This is the other side of the story.

I am very glad for Father’s story, especially because I have known men admitted to St. Luke’s and I know that others whom I know may have to go there as well.

There are inevitably two sides to these coins we toss about.   It is important to pay attention to the reverse of the medal.

Posted in Priests and Priesthood, The Drill | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

Oppressed priests and portable altars and true emergency conditions

St. Joseph’s Apprentice has made beautiful, practical portable altars for me and for many priests.

I have called his portable altars “the ultimate gift for a priest”.  I have one that I can travel with, using a Pelican case, that houses also travel vestments which you have all seen (thanks to a few readers for donations!) and everything else.  When it is all set up, it is grand and reverent.  Then back into the milspec case it goes.  That’s just my over the top solution, but the “travel altar” could go into a backpack, as it was designed to do.

In light of the horrors that some priests are subjected to right now these altars may be more and more important.

I received a note from the wonderful man who is “St. Joseph’s Apprentice”:

We (my wife and I) were so glad you did a post on the persecuted priests who are being forced into psych wards. We have been asked to build two altars so far for such priests. Fr. ___ even posted one on Twitter. This is a picture of his “Altar of Repose” he set up in his psychiatric hospital room on Holy Thursday. We used to be able to “google” this priest’s name but now he is no longer found on the Internet.  [I’m being targeted too.]

Your idea to start some respite [redoubt! Different.] for them in Montana sounded great. Something definitely should be done for these priests.

We had the idea that if you think it advisable, we could start a “GOFUNDME” account for altars for these priests. I definitely do not need the extra business as I am working 2-3 months out, but would like to be of help to these priests in whatever way possible. We also could find a safe haven up here in the Idaho woods for a priest or two. Keep us in mind. My nephew (a recent business grad from Univ. of Dallas and a good Catholic man) has offered to manage the gofundme account as I definite can’t manage that at this time. – Rick

Since I have been posting on the troubles of priests, people have poured notes into my email about their willingness to take them even into their homes.

Folks, this is very moving.

The GoFundMe account isn’t a bad idea.   Heck, we made it work with Leaflet Missal and the birettas, right?

At the same time, I think you know that in 90% of circumstances priests can’t stay in the homes of people whom they don’t know well.  Of course emergencies are emergencies.

All of this makes me think and think hard, but without losing a sense of humor (I hope).

Imagine a whole bunch of priests with checkered pasts, some maybe with real issues, descending on a home or town. The first scenes of the Hobbit movie with all the dwarves arriving comes to mind.  Imagine that these various and very different men find a kind of haven, a sort of “island of broken toys” and manage to form a new priestly community or society.  I think I would dust off my old plan to found “The Rubricians”.   Or maybe it would be more like, “The Dream Team”?

Posted in Be The Maquis, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

A story about St. Luke’s: “you are totally in their power – you are utterly at their mercy.”

The horror stories are pouring in from priests who have been through The Psych Strike Gambit by their bishops or superiors.   Here is one, with some detail, which I have permission to post and which I have anonymized.  His is a fairly recent experience, under the new, not ancient, regime of St. Luke’s.  It’s current.

My emphases and comments.

I am a solemnly professed religious (not a cleric) in what is regarded as a very orthodox community. As one of your comments mentioned, sometimes these things are not ideologically motivated, it’s just a way of dealing with someone who stepped out of line/ might need help. That was my case.  [I’ve also mentioned that there, truly, some priests and religious who really do need help.] (Nonetheless, I saw and experienced many in the ideologically motivated position you spoke of.)

[…]

As I mentioned, I did an evaluation at St. Luke’s. Before I even got there, I was given the strong impression that my vocation depended completely on going. Once there, the impression of the power of that place over my future was overwhelming. You clearly know that you and your whole future in your vocation depends upon getting a good report from these people. I saw and heard that same fear in the others I met there. I was surprised by the number of younger men, especially those who were amenable to tradition, etc. Also, what you said about lack of communication and total lack of privacy is completely correct. You have to sign disclosures immediately upon arrival.
Specifically, one of the doctors evaluating me mentioned how strange is was that I was not sexually active during high school and had not experimented with homosexual acts. He said that such behavior was a normal part of development. Thus, on top of everything, I was deemed sexually immature, even though I had had no problems with chastity. As far as I could tell, the vast majority of people there were on a lot of meds. Thankfully, I avoided that.
Now, for the six months in St. Louis. Again, you know that you are totally in their power and that everything depends upon getting a good report. The St. Louis Consultation Center (now the St. Luke’s Consultation Center, it was recently acquired by St. Luke’s) is an outpatient program, which makes it much less intense and provides more individual freedom because there is no residential aspect to the program. What I saw and heard over the course of six-months: I was personally encouraged to masturbate (that was normal, and I know that others were likewise encouraged)/ I was told that if I went on a “leave of absence” I could explore dating and “see where that went”/ I saw other priests and religious in the program whose struggles surrounded homosexuality freely encouraged to fully identify as gay/ praying the Liturgy of Hours/ going to Mass daily, etc. was considered “rigid.” The sanctity of vows or one’s vocation was not taken seriously. Eg. Priests who were otherwise totally capable of being good priests (and had been for many years) were totally unchallenged in “discerning” out of the priesthood. Finally, one priest who became a good friend of mine was sent there for preaching against contraception.
Also, a note. At both of these places, your stay can be extended beyond six-months at the behest of your bishop/superior or the staff.  [Sweet Mother of God, Queen of the Clergy, save these men!]
I think you get the drift. [NB] It’s too bad, because for those who need psychological/ emotional help, they do that part very well. There is a lot to gain for those who need it. It’s just not reinforced with the Church’s teaching, or free from the atmosphere of pressure and coercion. In that respect, it was all disheartening and confusing.
The main thing I would emphasize is that you are utterly at their mercy. Further, bishops/ superiors can use your time at these programs as justification to do whatever they want with you/ to you for the rest of your life. Whenever they want, the simple fact that you were there can come back to haunt you (often completely outside the bounds of Canon Law). As you said, they never forget who is paying the bills. Unfortunately, I would know about this, since, after going through all of that, I have been treated very unjustly (not just according to me) and now have to be represented by a canon lawyer.
Please pray for me. Know of my prayers for you and your very good work.

Story after story, friends.

Take away… and this is consistent with other things I have heard.  They can do a good job with priests and religious who need real help.  I’ve heard that they can do that well.  However, they also can be the arm of the bishop.

It seems that they will do anything for money, good job, hit job, whatever.

Mary, Queen of the Clergy, intercede for us with Your Son the High Priest.

UPDATE:

For a POSITIVE take… HERE

Posted in Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , ,
15 Comments

Fr. Z thanks readers who want to help priests.

It doesn’t surprise me even as it surprised me.   I am ever amazed at the response I get from readers in certain circumstances, even as I have, over time, learned to expect it.

Since I posted about Fr. Kalchik, and since I wrote about a dream in which there was a haven for priests in a Western state, and especially since I posted about how some (not all!) bishops deal with troublesome priests – The Psych Strike Gambit – quite a few of you have written to offer help to priests who are under fire.

  • Some of you have offered your homes.
  • Some of you have offered to set priests up somewhere.
  • Some of you have in a generic way said that they are praying hard.
  • Some of you, quite a few, have told me that you know priests in these situation.
  • Some PRIESTS have written about their own experience with The Psych Strike Gambit played by their bishops (or religious with superiors).

Is this something that has to go somewhere?

I don’t know what that would be, exactly.

I had a glimpse, as mentioned elsewhere, of a community set up almost like the Camaldolese, wherein each man has his own “cabin” but there is more of a community life than in a Carthusian set up.

If suddenly some wealthy guy in the mountains of Montana or Idaho or Wyoming sends photos of this sort of place already built and ready to go…

… wouldn’t that be interesting?

You never know.  Providence works mysteriously.

I think it is fascinating that the new Gower Abbey church was fully consecrated in the traditional rite.  Those Benedictines have the apostolate of praying for bishops and priests.

Timely.

 

Posted in Priests and Priesthood, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged
14 Comments

Wherein Fr. Z rants: the tyrannies of #sodoclerical euroweenies with their self-centered, condescending effeminate blather

The old phrase is: Piscis primum a capite foetet.

Over the many years I have been either going to or living in Rome, it has been interesting to see how the styles and modes change in the ecclesiastical shops. These modes are driven by two forces: market forces and the imaginations of the shopkeepers, trying to anticipate where clerical tastes will go in this or that pontificate. Toward the end of John Paul’s life, the shops were getting more and more traditional, losing the sheer crap of Pauline aestheticism.  In Benedict XVI’s time that accelerated. Now, you see junk returning, edging back in. However, seminarians and priests these days seem, as far as I can tell, to want the more traditional stuff.  I don’t think seminarians, from what I hear, are paying much attention to this… new stuff we are hearing.

On the other hand, the Vicariate of Rome’s subtle messaging from above drives many things which happen inside churches. The last time I was in Rome (May) I noted the sudden appearance of liturgical MONSTROSITIES, entirely out of place in the spaces where they were callously installed. Think of the altar in the Pantheon and the ghastly pile of rubbish now defacing Sant’Andrea della Valle.  It is enough to make angels hang their heads in embarrassment and cause those interred within the sacred walls and floors to rattle their bones in the indignant dust.

I received this note from a priest:

My experience of studying in Rome tells me that Italy (and probably most of Europe) is far behind the United States as regards “winds” of liturgical movement. Whereas we in the USA seem to have left the truly crazy days behind and turned a corner in some degree of liturgical “sound mindedness,” Italy is in the heyday of post-Vatican II nonsense. [Italy is a liturgical wasteland.] Visiting Rome this week after many years, liturgical appointments seem even more cheap and tawdry than my last visit. Some truly sinfully stupid things are going on in sanctuaries in Rome. Some pics are with this email.

I was shocked at Sant’ Andrea della Valle that the presbytery/sanctuary has been completed vacated and a huge stage area set up just outside the Communion rail. In a certain sense I’m glad that the new junk isn’t in the sanctuary but the notion of having vacated the true sanctuary is such a telling and emblematic move.

The Basilica of Sant’ Eustachio seems to have a food pantry operation taking place in a side chapel before an altar that had once been made and consecrated for sacred worship. The area is complete with caterer chafing dishes lined up like a buffet serving line and a bread cutting station.

The Church of Santa Lucia has some new art productions hanging in a side chapel. One modern style painting is of a woman (Mary?) standing behind a young boy (Jesus?). For some reason the woman is crowning the boy (what does that even mean) and more inexplicable the boy is stark naked.

What is this garbage?! As much damage as has been done in the USA we do at least seem better off than Europe. However lasting damage and still undeveloped ripple effects from having changed our rites is an ongoing tragedy on both sides of the Atlantic.

This is a manifestation of a clericalism that is probably also #sodoclericalism if you get my drift.

These Italian clerical euroweenies fancy themselves aesthetes.  How sophisticated they are!  They disgusted me for decades with their self-centered, condescending effeminate blather.    I suffered for years from their sacrilegious tyrannies.

I honestly don’t think they have the faith.  They certainly have no respect for people who come into the churches or for their forebears who built them.

And they don’t, when there are conflicts or disagreements, act like normal men do to trash them out.   That also characterizes those bishops who send men off to the psych ward.

We must hold on.  We must hold on and expand.   The weenies will drop away and leave the field open for our advance if we just have the will to get out beyond our comfort zones and start inviting people to join us, reclaim tradition.   In order to do that, you will have to be smart and patient and excel in good works.

You must, as traditional Catholics, learn to overcome your anxiety about the times we are enduring and, on the contrary, exude hopeful joy.

Joy will attract.

It is one thing starkly to identify what is going on, as we do in these pages, and what other do on their sites.   We must, however, also underscore the good things that are going on.  And there are good things!

More and more young priests are turning to traditional liturgical worship, an ars celebrandi.  Good bishops are getting good vocations and are inviting groups to take dying parishes.  The mask is being pulled off the fakers and the parasites.  People are waking up.

This is a WAR but this is also an OPPORTUNITY.

 

Posted in Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged
15 Comments

“Why do I keep reading stuff Popes said? Pathetic old Roman Catholic me.”

From The Great Roman today:

Why do I keep reading stuff Popes said? Pathetic old Roman Catholic me. I can hear the cobbles in the Piazza screaming at me with the voice of my grandma multiplied by the thousands: “Pray! Fast! We could use some help here!!!”. Maybe I am just going insane.

It seems to me that someone else once said that if the truth would be suppressed, even the stones would cry out.

Would that the following still echoed off the stones of the Piazza San Pietro.

“(…) our doctrine is detached from the errors which circulated and by now flourish in the culture of our time, and which could completely ruin our Christian view of life and history. The Modernism represented the characteristic expression of these errors, and under other terms it is still current.  (Cfr. Decr. Lamentabili di S. Pio X, 1907, e la sua Enc. Pascendi; DENZ.- SCH. 3401, ss.) We can therefore comprehend why the Catholic Church, yesterday and today, must give such great importance to the rigorous conservation of authentic Revelation, and considers it inviolable, and must have a conscience so severe about its fundamental duty to defend and to transmit the doctrine of the faith in unequivocal terms; othodoxy is her first concern; the pastoral magisterium is her primary and providential function; in fact the apostolic teaching secures the canons of her preaching; and the instruction of the Apostle Paul: Depositum custodi (1 Tim. 6, 20;2 Tim. 1, 14) constitutes for her such a responsibility that it would be treason to violate it.  The Church as teacher does not invent her doctrine; she is the witness, the guard, the interpreter, the vehicle; and, regarding the truths belonging to the Christian message, she can be called conservative, intransigent; and to those who strive to make her faith easier, more relative to the tastes of the changing mentality of the times, she responds with the Apostles: non possumus, we cannot (Act. 4,20).

Paul VI General Audience, 19 Jan 1972

 

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liberals, The future and our choices | Tagged
2 Comments

UPDATED – INTERVIEW – @ArchChicago parish burns a “rainbow flag”

UPDATE: 27 Sept

Part 2: HERE

UPDATE: 26 Sept

Church Militant has a video interview with Fr. Kalchik. Father is in hiding, concerned for his safety.

Some of the content is NOT for kids. Be aware.

UPDATE: 23 Sept

It just gets worse.

UPDATE: 22 Sept

From 2 Peter and Mahound.

Chicago Priest Who Burned Gay Flag Flees After Archdiocese Threatens Forcible Removal

Just hours ago, new Chicago Auxiliary Bishop Mark Bartosic arrived unannounced at Resurrection Parish on Chicago’s Northwest side and told Pastor Paul Kalchik that he had just minutes to get his belongings together and vacate the premises or the police would be called to arrest him for trespassing.  [… in mercy, of course, this is called “accompanying”.]

Fr. Kalchik was about to perform a wedding.

Soon after, Fr. Kalchik left for an undisclosed location, accompanied by his brother who had been visiting the parish.

Bp. Bartosic performed the wedding instead, hastily slipping out the door of the church only seconds after concluding the ceremony.  [Gosh it must have been special for them to have had a bishop.]

Fr. Kalchik had been ordered by Cardinal Cupich and the archdiocese to report for psychiatric counseling and perhaps confinement yesterday after controversy broke concerning the exorcism and burning of a “gay rainbow flag” on parish grounds last week.

Fr. Kalchik had also called for Catholics to “boycott” masses celebrated by Cardinal Cupich due to Cupich’s alleged involvement in the current clerical sex abuse scandal.

[…]

Today, a small group of parishioners not involved in the wedding but who had heard of the sudden appearance of Bp. Bartosic, stood stunned outside the Church. The group also included two employees who were hastily told by the bishop to report to work as normal on Monday.

One of the parishioners, a Chicago policeman, told me of some of the bizarre events of the last week, including numerous threats of death and rape against Fr. Kalchik, at least two probable attempted break-ins or acts of vandalism, one of which included breaking keys into all the locks in the doors of the church office. And then there was the visit by two Archdiocese representatives, yesterday, ordering Fr. Kalchik to vacate his parish and commit himself into psychiatric confinement.

One of these was Fr. Dennis Lyle, the same prelate who had visited St. John Cantius a few months ago to inform parishioners that their pastor, Fr. Phillips, had been relieved of his position there.

Fr. Kalchik had written of his own psychological trauma after being molested as a boy and young man by two priests in separate incidents. It is assumed that he will not comply with the order of the archdiocese. He is not now “hospitalized” as some reports have suggested.

The parishioners outside told me that Fr. Kalchik, who has been at Resurrection Parish for eleven years, has the full support of his parish.

Many of them will no doubt only discover what happened, tomorrow, when coming to Mass assuming it will be celebrated by Fr. Paul, will instead encounter Bp. Bartosic.

UPDATE: 22 Sept

Some of you will remember what I wrote recently about bishops sending priests for “evaluation”.

UPDATE:

Right on cue, homosexuals are after this priest’s chitlins.  An Alder… woman?  Aldergal? is on his case, calling for protests.

Chicago Tribune

WGN – with the obligatory comments of shock from a protestant ministrix.

It’ll be interesting to see what the Archdiocese does to this priest.  I hope he is left alone, but that is not what I expect.    I expect that he will be “mercy-ed”.  Maybe even “accompanied”… out the door.

UPDATE:

I see that the Church-hating McClatchy newspaper group is spreading the story.

 


NBC news’ local affiliate had informative video interview with Card. Cupich of Chicago. Remember?  He said that Francis has better things to do than investigate clerical abuse, like protect fish from plastic straws – HERE).

NBC now reports that there was an act of defiance in Chicago recently.  But they left out some critical information.   Better is ChurchMilitant and also Chicago Sun Times:

Priest defies Cardinal Cupich, burns LGBTQ flag on church grounds

A North Side priest who says he “can’t sit well” with Cardinal Blase Cupich burned a gay-friendly flag outside his Avondale church last week — against the wishes of the cardinal he claims is trying to minimize the clergy sex-abuse crisis.

Rev. Paul Kalchik says the banner, featuring a cross superimposed over a rainbow, had been featured prominently in the sanctuary at Resurrection Catholic Church but had been taken down and was forgotten in storage at the parish at 3043 N. Francisco for more than a decade.

Kalchik led seven parishioners in a prayer of exorcism Friday, and the flag was burned inside a portable fire pit placed the schoolyard next to the church. The ashes of the flag now rest in a church compost heap.

“That banner and what it stood for doesn’t belong to the Archdiocese or Cardinal Cupich. It belongs to the people of this parish who paid for it,” Kalchik said. “What have we done wrong other than destroy a piece of propaganda that was used to put out a message other than what the church is about?”

[…]

Kalchik, 56, claims he was preceded by three “bad priests” who were “big in promoting the gay lifestyle” before he was ordained as pastor of Resurrection by Cardinal Francis George in 2007.

The flag was first displayed prominently at the church’s altar in 1991 to welcome LGBTQ worshippers to the faith, according to Kalchik, but it was later taken down and put into storage — along with priestly vestments and candles emblazoned with rainbow colors.

Kalchik said he found the vestments and destroyed them when he arrived in 2007, but somehow missed the flag until another cleaning session last month.

“The people of this parish have been pretty resilient and put up with a lot of B.S.” Kalchik said in an interview in his office Tuesday night. “And it was just by accident that this banner that was made to celebrate all things gay … did not get destroyed when I first got here.”

[…]

In a church bulletin dated Sept. 2, Kalchik announced that he planned to burn the flag Sept. 29 for “the Feast of Saint Michael, Gabriel and Raphael.” But a few days later, the archdiocese told him to scrap the burning after officials were notified of his plans by a reporter for the Windy City Times.

The priest says the archdiocese threatened him with “canonical penalties” if he went through with the flag burning, and that Cupich has since blocked Kalchik’s request to transfer to a diocese in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, where Kalchik has family.

Despite the orders from the archdiocese, Kalchik admits he went ahead and destroyed the flag “in a quiet way” on Friday.

Kalchik — who says he was sexually abused by a neighbor as a child, and again by a priest when he began working for the church at 19 — says the sex-abuse crisis plaguing the church is “definitely a gay thing.” Cupich has rejected a connection between the scandal and gay priests but has drawn criticism in recent weeks for comments claiming the church should focus on other priorities instead of being “distracted” by the sex-abuse crisis.

“I can’t sit well with people like Cardinal Cupich, who minimizes all of this,” Kalchik said. “Excuse me, but almost all of the [abuse] cases are, with respect to priests, bishops and whatnot, taking and using other young men sexually. It’s definitely a gay thing.”

Of gays in the church, Kalchik says “scripture is crystal-clear. It’s against God’s law.”

As of Tuesday night, Kalchik said the archdiocese had not contacted him since the flag was torched.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, Mail from priests, Si vis pacem para bellum!, Sin That Cries To Heaven | Tagged
83 Comments

25 September: Bl. Herman “the Cripple”

One of my Roman interlocutors reminded me by text that today is the Feast of Bl. Herman of Reichenau, “the Cripple”, honored in the Benedictine Tradition.  This was an amazing guy!  He could barely move and hardly speak, stricken with many maladies.

When you might think that you have it bad, try reading about Bl. Herman!

As my interlocutor wrote:

For the Benedictines today is the feast of Bl. Hermann “the Cripple” who wrote the Salve Regina and the Alma Redemptoris  Mater. He was a genius of math, geometry, music and natural sciences.His story is simply amazing. Spina bifida, cleft palate, all sorts of illnesses. He needed a monk to help him for everything. But he had a wicked sense of humor and was admired universally.  But in today’s Europe his birth would have been considered a disgrace and aborted or euthanized. Or called an ossified unreconstructed manualist and neopelagian self-absorbed judgmentalist.

He could barely speak in an intelligible way and suffered excruciating pain all his life. And yet he was always joking with his fellow monks and encouraging them through adversities. Pope Leo IX and Emperor Henry III visited him and his advice was sought by prelates and authorities. This guy was a victory over the damages of the original sin through and through.

Here is a link to some of his works: HERE

The wiki entry on Bl. Herman lists many of his attributes.

He spent most of his life in the Abbey of Reichenau, an island on Lake Constance in Germany. Hermann contributed to all four arts of the quadrivium. He was renowned as a musical composer (among his surviving works are officia for St. Afra and St. Wolfgang). He also wrote a treatise on the science of music, several works on geometry and arithmetics and astronomical treatises (including instructions for the construction of an astrolabe, at the time a very novel device in Western Europe). As a historian, he wrote a detailed chronicle from the birth of Christ to his own present day, ordering them after the reckoning of the Christian era. One of his disciples Berthold of Reichenau continued it.

At twenty, Hermann was professed as a Benedictine monk, spending the rest of his life in a monastery. He was literate in several languages, including Arabic, Greek and Latin and wrote about mathematics, astronomy and Christianity. He built musical and astronomical instruments and was also a famed religious poet. When he went blind in later life, he began writing hymns, the best known of which is Salve Regina (Hail Holy Queen).

Herman died in a monastery on September 24, 1054, aged 40. The Roman Catholic Church beatified him in 1863.

Raise a prayer to Bl. Herman to intercede with God for many graces on those who have children with great challenges.

Listen and think of the gift we have received from Bl. Herman.   Sung by the Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles, who now have the the beautifully, recently consecrated, Gower Abbey.

Alma Redemptoris Mater.

Salve Regina.

UPDATE:

I see that  DiPippo over at NLM beat me to it!   He has a good post there on Bl. Herman.

Posted in Our Solitary Boast, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged , , ,
2 Comments