#ASonnetADay – 82. “I grant thou wert not married to my Muse…”

Posted in Poetry, Sonnet A Day |
Comments Off on #ASonnetADay – 82. “I grant thou wert not married to my Muse…”

Canon Law changed – bishops will now need permission of Holy See to establish religious institutes

At vatican.va and National Catholic Register…

Francis issued a Motu Proprio and changed 1983 CIC can. 579 “which concerns the erection of religious orders and congregations, referred to in Church law as institutes of consecrated life and societies of apostolic life.”

VATICAN CITY — Pope Francis has changed canon law to require a bishop to have permission from the Holy See prior to establishing a new religious institute in his diocese, further strengthening Vatican oversight over the process.  [“oversight”?  Is that what we are calling it now?]

With a Nov. 4 motu proprio, Pope Francis modified canon 579 of the Code of Canon Law, which concerns the erection of religious orders and congregations, referred to in Church law as institutes of consecrated life and societies of apostolic life.

The Vatican clarified in 2016 that by law the diocesan bishop was required to consult with the Apostolic See before giving canonical recognition to a new institute. The new canon provides further Vatican oversight by requiring the bishop to have the prior written permission of the Apostolic See.  [Permission… from this Curia.]

According to Pope Francis’ apostolic letter “Authenticum charismatis,” the change ensures that the Vatican will accompany bishops more closely in their discernment about the erection of a new religious order or congregation, and gives “final judgment” over the decision to the Holy See.  [“accompany bishops more closely in their discernment”]

The new text of the canon will go into effect Nov. 10.

The modification to canon 579 makes “the preventive control of the Holy See more evident,” Fr. Fernando Puig, vice dean of canon law at the Pontifical University of Santa Croce, told CNA. [NB: “preventive control”… to keep undesirable results from occurring, of course]

“In my opinion, the base [of the law] has not changed,” he said, adding that “certainly the autonomy of the bishops decreases and there is a centralization of this competence in favor of Rome.”

The motivations for the change, Fr. Puig explained, go back to a clarification of the interpretation of the law, requested by the Vatican’s Congregation for Institutes of Religious Life and Societies of Apostolic Life in 2016.  [The same Congregation which helped out the FFIs.]

Pope Francis clarified in May 2016 that, for validity, canon 579 required bishops to consult closely with the Vatican on their decision, even if it did not require them to obtain permission per se.  [But now it isn’t consultation … it’s permission.]

Writing in L’Osservatore Romano in June 2016, Archbishop José Rodríguez Carballo, the congregation’s secretary, explained that the congregation asked for the clarification out of a desire to prevent the “careless” establishment of religious institutes and societies.

According to Archbishop Rodríguez, crises in religious institutes had included internal division and power struggles, abusive disciplinary measures, or problems with authoritarian founders who feel they are the “true fathers and masters of the charism.”

Inadequate discernment on the part of bishops, Archbishop Rodríguez said, had led to the Vatican needing to intervene in problems which could have been prevented if they had been detected before giving canonical recognition to the institute or society.

In his Nov. 4 motu proprio, Pope Francis said that “the faithful have the right to be informed by their Shepherds about the authenticity of the charisms and about the integrity of those who present themselves as founders” of a new congregation or order.

“The Apostolic See,” he continued, “is responsible for accompanying Shepherds in the discernment process that leads to the ecclesial recognition of a new Institute or a new Society of diocesan right.”

He quoted Pope John Paul II’s 1996 post-synodal apostolic exhortation “Vita consecrata,” which said that new religious institutes and societies “must be evaluated by the authority of the Church, which is responsible for the appropriate examination both to test the authenticity of the inspiring purpose and to avoid the excessive multiplication of institutions similar to each other.”

Pope Francis said: “The new institutes of consecrated life and the new societies of apostolic life, therefore, must be officially recognized by the Apostolic See, which alone has the last judgment.”

So what is now the difference between institutes established by diocesan bishops and those by the Holy See?

I don’t know about what’s going on in Africa, S. America, etc.  However, it seems to me that this is aimed directly at the prevention of the undesirable rise of traditionally oriented religious institutes.   I have a strong sense that just about the only new groups that are being founded are, in fact, tradition leaning.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged ,
35 Comments

Blue Angels getting a make over

Have you ever seen the US Navy’s Blue Angels?   They won’t be the same again, after today.  They are making a change!

From the Navy Times:

Blue Angels to make final flight in the legacy F/A/-18 Hornet as they transition to Super Hornets

The Navy’s Blue Angels will conduct their final flight in the legacy F/A-18 Hornet fighter jet Wednesday [today, 4 Nov!]

The flight, which will take off from and land at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida, marks the end of the F/A-18 A/B/C/D platform’s 34 years as the Blue Angels’ aircraft as the team transitions to F/A-18 E/F Super Hornets.

The move to the Super Hornet will mark the first time the elite Navy and Marine Corps demonstration team has changed aircraft since it moved from the A-4F Skyhawk II to the Hornet back in 1986.

[…]

See the article for more.

Blue Angels getting a make over

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
6 Comments

ASonnetADay – 81. “Or I shall live your epitaph to make…”

Posted in Poetry, Sonnet A Day |
Comments Off on ASonnetADay – 81. “Or I shall live your epitaph to make…”

The 2020 Election and MILITARY ABSENTEE BALLOTS – not counted yet

A Military Times (via Navy Times) – my emphases.

There are still tens of thousands of military absentee ballots yet to be counted

Could absentee ballots coming from military voters and U.S. citizens overseas still make a difference in this election, even after most of the counting is done?

That remains to be seen, with the changing margins of votes. In four of the states that are still in play for the president’s race, election officials allow absentee ballots from military voters and overseas citizens to arrive after Election Day. That includes Pennsylvania, which requires those ballots to be signed by Nov. 2, but can arrive up until 5 p.m. on Nov. 10.

Wisconsin and Michigan were still up in the air as of this writing, but those military and overseas votes had to be in to election officials by 8 p.m. on Election Day.

The military and overseas ballots could also be a factor in some close Senate races.

According to Associated Press numbers as of 10 a.m. Wednesday, President Donald Trump was ahead of Joe Biden by 560,010 votes in Pennsylvania. There are more than 1.4 million mail-in votes yet to be counted in Pennsylvania. But through Nov. 10, valid ballots can still arrive from military absentee voters and U.S. citizens overseas. It’s anyone guess as to how the margins will change, but in the 2016 presidential election, Pennsylvania counted a total of 22,327 ballots from these voters, to include 7,788 military ballots, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

North Carolina: The margin of Trump over Biden was 76,712 votes, with the count continuing. In 2016, there were 17,201 military and overseas absentee ballots counted, including 6,317 military. But in North Carolina, local election officials accept absentee ballots from military and overseas voters through Nov. 12 — and no postmark is required on the ballot.

Georgia: The margin of Trump over Biden was 102,212 votes, with the count continuing. In 2016, there were 12,432 military and overseas absentee ballots counted, including 5,203 military ballots. Georgia election officials accept absentee ballots from these voters by Nov. 6, as long as they were postmarked by Nov. 3.

Nevada: Biden was ahead of Trump at the latest count, by 7,647 votes. In 2016, Nevada counted a total of 6,290 military and overseas absentee ballots, to include 2,677 from military voters. Nevada election officials accept ballots through Nov. 10, as long as they were postmarked by Nov. 3.

Overall in 2016, there were 252,574 military absentee ballots counted by all the states; and 382,896 absentee ballots from U.S. citizens overseas, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

As everyone has seen, the margins of votes in this election are changing rapidly as more votes are counted. Military and overseas citizens’ votes will be counted by election officials, but the fact that some states have previously carved out later deadlines to allow for more transit times for these ballots could make a difference. On the other hand, a number of these voters got their ballots in earlier.

Under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, commonly known as UOCAVA, states must make certain provisions to make voting easier for UOCAVA voters. That includes offering voters the option of receiving their blank ballot electronically (states can choose to offer email, fax, or online portal); and accepting the FWAB as a backup ballot for all federal elections. States were required to send the blank ballots to UOCAVA voters at least 45 days before an election.

In 29 states and the District of Columbia, their laws and rules allow election officials to count ballots that arrive after the polls close from military, their family members, and U.S. citizens overseas, according to an analysis conducted for the Count Every Hero campaign. That organization has cautioned news organizations, candidates and election officials about declaring winners before the military vote is counted.

Posted in The Coming Storm, The Drill | Tagged ,
3 Comments

News about a TMSM vestment project: Solemn Mass set in violet

Cheery news!

I occasionally get checks from kind readers for the Tridentine Mass Society of the Diocese of Madison, a 501(c)(3) organization of which I am the jefe.

Even in this time of the Wuhan Devil, which has shut down a lot of our more solemn liturgy here, the TMSM is still having worthy vestments made against the time when things are brighter.

For example, right now in production by Sacra Domus Aurea is a Solemn Mass set in violet, which will be received by Advent.  I’ve received a few photos of the set as they are being completed.

The cope…

News about a TMSM vestment project: Solemn Mass set in violet

News about a TMSM vestment project: Solemn Mass set in violet

The chasuble

News about a TMSM vestment project: Solemn Mass set in violet

A dalmatic

News about a TMSM vestment project: Solemn Mass set in violet

We will have matching humeral veil, antependium, and tabernacle veil.

We are moving FORWARD.

Thank you to you donors to the TMSM.  When things settle down a little, I will try to organize a SOLEMN Mass for your intention.

Meanwhile, I will say a Mass for your intention tomorrow, Feast of the Holy Relics.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , ,
1 Comment

ASK FATHER: Does the Sacrament of Anointing *always* forgive sins or are there conditions that must be met?

ASK FATHER: Does the Sacrament of Anointing *always* forgive sins or are there conditions that must be met?From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I have received extreme unction four times since April.
Does the Anointing *always* forgive sins or are there conditions that must be met. I’m worried now since through my own lack of planning COVID-19 and just being disabled, and sick I’ve not confessed since last year. I know i know. But it’s no longer a wheelchair ride away.

Anointing forgives sins sometimes, not all the time.  There are conditions.

The effects of the Sacrament of Anointing or Anointing of the Sick or, sometimes, Extreme Unction, are:

  • To increase sanctifying grace in a moment of great need (danger of death)
  • To console the person
  • To strengthen against temptation
  • To heal the body
  • To forgive mortal sins when a person is incapable of confessing them or is unaware of his state of soul

Anointing was placed in the category of “sacraments of the living”, a handy way of saying that for them to be as effective as they can be, we must receive them while “alive”, that is, not “dead in sin”, that is, in the state of grace.

If a person is compos sui and can make his own decisions and understand what is going on, he must be given a chance to make his confession before being anointed. Even if his communication is impeded, he should indicate by signs and respond to the priest’s questions.

If a person is not sui compos, cannot respond, and isn’t aware of what is going on, such a person can be anointed and, in that case, the sacrament can also impart forgiveness of mortal sins.

If a person in the state of mortal sin – who is able to confess and receive absolution – receives the sacrament of anointing, the sacrament will not be effective in her in the way Christ and the Church intend.

If a person is NOT able to confess, then the sacrament also forgives mortal sins so that the sacrament can be effective.

How merciful is our God?

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
5 Comments

#ASonnetADay – 80. “O, how I faint when I of you do write…”

Posted in Poetry, Sonnet A Day |
Comments Off on #ASonnetADay – 80. “O, how I faint when I of you do write…”

Notes about Holy Communion

Notes about Holy CommunionI saw a very good post at Ann Barnhardt’s blog. HERE

It is in no way polemical or political. It is, however, both timely and perennial. It is something that needs refreshing in the minds and hearts of many and introduction to even more who may never have heard things expressed with this urgency about…

… Holy Communion.

In a prayer I wrote against the Wuhan Devil (linked on the top menu and HERE) while begging for relief from the disease I ask God to forgive the countless sacrilegious Communions people have made over the last decades.  Remember also the study that shows a huge decline in belief in the Church’s teaching of the Eucharist.  Put all that together with the COVID acceleration of the demographic sinkhole that was already opening up under the Church and, well, we’ve got trouble, my friends, trouble, I say trouble right here in 2020.

Have a look at Anne’s post.   In a nutshell, she reminds everyone, quite properly, that we should treat every Holy Communion like it was our first, our last, and our only Communion.  In fact, every Communion could be our last, because we are going to die and we do NOT know when.

We don’t know when.

Also, take some time to look at the image she posted.  It has excellent details that, once upon a time, would have been understood by all but, now, we are recovering.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Four Last Things, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World | Tagged ,
15 Comments

ASK FATHER: A priest complains about another priest’s form of absolution in his confession

ASK FATHER: A priest complains about another priest's form of absolution in his confessionFrom a priest reader…

QUAERITUR:

At the risk of testing your patience . . . is it valid if the Priest (after improvising the first half of the absolution formula) says: “I absolve you from all the sins of your life . . .”?

I am a Priest, and I cannot find ANYONE I know that doesn’t mess around with the absolution formula! I say it (and all sacramental formulae) EXACTLY as they appear in the rituals. It drives me crazy!

I have mentioned it to the offending priests , only to get a snotty reply; I mentioned to the Priest who was pastor at the time. He was kind and seemed concerned–but nothing happened.

Given the state of the Church, I have lost confidence in our Bishop and even the SCDF–it’s cardinal against cardinal and bishop against bishop! I am so disgusted and disheartened at this point.

Father, I hear you.

First, what the well-meaning and likely soft-headed improve amateur said was probably valid.   That doesn’t in any way excuse this sort of thing.

As far as I know, the only approved English translation – at least in the USA – for the new-fangled post-Conciliar form of absolution is (with my emphasis):

“God, the Father of mercies, through the death and resurrection of his Son has reconciled the world to himself and sent the Holy Spirit among us for the forgiveness of sins; through the ministry of the Church may God give you pardon and peace, and I absolve you from your sins in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.”

It is amazing how many questions I get about the antics of jackass priests in the matter of the words of absolution or some other fundamental aspect of the sacrament.

Priests have to get the word out about the legitimate form of absolution.   Furthermore, they should not in any way allow another priest to say something weird and questionable during their own confessions.  No.  This has to be firmly resisted, put to an end.

ASK FATHER: A priest complains about another priest's form of absolution in his confession

By the way, I have an old PODCAzT about the Latin Forms of Absolution

PODCAzT 155: Latin Forms of Absolution, Vetus and Novus Ordo

Finally, in the document Redemptionis Sacramentum we read at the end:

Complaints Regarding Abuses in Liturgical Matters

[183.] In an altogether particular manner, let everyone do all that is in their power to ensure that the Most Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist [all sacraments, actually] will be protected from any and every irreverence or distortion and that all abuses be thoroughly corrected. This is a most serious duty incumbent upon each and every one, and all are bound to carry it out without any favouritism.

[184.] Any Catholic, whether Priest or Deacon or lay member of Christ’s faithful, has the right to lodge a complaint regarding a liturgical abuse to the diocesan Bishop or the competent Ordinary equivalent to him in law, or to the Apostolic See on account of the primacy of the Roman Pontiff. It is fitting, however, insofar as possible, that the report or complaint be submitted first to the diocesan Bishop. This is naturally to be done in truth and charity.

I would add to this that, in a parish, start with the pastor – if feasible – and work your way up.

And always always always say a prayer for any priest who might be doing something a little dodgy.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests | Tagged ,
7 Comments