Worried about Coronavirus? Feed your anxiety, and commonsense. – UPDATED

UPDATE 31 Jan 2020:

We’ve learned that, in Chicago, there is a case of human to human transmission of the virus.  W.H.O. declared an emergency.

Today I read.

___ Originally Published on: Jan 28, 2020

A little anxiety can create clear thinking.  A lot of anxiety can cause paralysis.   We need information to help us game things out in our heads, which ought to be a constant, commonsense, practice of situational awareness.

I’ve been a reader of dystopian novels for some time, though I had taken a bit of a break.   They help you game things out.  I’m now calling back to mind some books that dealt with pandemics as one of the SHTF scenarios.

You can get these on Kindle, my reader of choice especially for current events books or just entertainment.  Great for travel.  And you can search the books.  Moreover, they don’t gather dust in stacks around my apartment.

First, there’s one from the writer of Dune, Frank Herbert.  A truly creepy scenario.

The White Plague

US HERE – UK HERE

There is another dated book by Stephen King

The Stand

US HERE – UK HERE

Closer to our own calendar date

THE JAKARTA PANDEMIC: A Modern Thriller (Alex Fletcher Book 1) by Stephen Konkoly.

US HERE – UK HERE

This next fellow, Bobby Akart, writes without strong language, vulgarities or sexual innuendo.  He wants young people also to be able to read.

Pandemic: Beginnings: A Post-Apocalyptic Medical Thriller Fiction Series (The Pandemic Series Book 1)

US HERE – UK HERE

Remember also…

The Plague by Albert Camus

The Andromeda Strain by Michael Crichton

Executive Orders by Tom Clancy

With Kindle Unlimited you can read lots of books for free.

I once heard an interview with someone from the CDC, who talked about cycles of pandemics.  He said that we are way over due, in the cycles of these outbreaks.  He commented that, were a bad one to break out, we will be totally overwhelmed.  The image he used was “stacking bodies like cord wood”.

In any event,

GO TO CONFESSION.

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION, Semper Paratus, TEOTWAWKI, The Coming Storm | Tagged ,
28 Comments

A troubling, curious point in the Third Secret of Fátima

Something was made known to me a while back that I have been pondering.  It involves the Third Secret of Our Lady of Fatima.  It really bothers me.

A refresher:

The three children who were the seers at Fatima, received three secrets on the 13 July apparition.  Carmelite nun Sister Lúcia, who as a little girl was one of the three children to whom Our Lady appeared, revealed two secrets in 1941.  She did not disclose the third secret until 1943 at the command of the bishop.  She wrote it down and sealed it in an envelope and said that it should be opened in 1960.  It was eventually sent to Rome in 1957 where it was stored away securely.    The text of the Third Secret was released by the Vatican in 2000.

There is controversy about the Third Secret.  Firstly, the timing of its release was a problem.  Also, the other secrets have explanations from Mary.  Where’s Mary’s explanation of the Third?

More in this book, CLICK.

Also, the Third Secret was kept in both the archive of the Holy Office and also in a safe in the papal apartments in the Apostolic Palace… so it was divided.  Also, there are indications that Popes read the Third Secret for “first time”… twice.  How do you do that if it is one thing?   Was one the text and the other the explanation?   In 2000 Card. Ratzinger gave a theological explanation.  Frankly, and with respect, that didn’t resolve a lot of the questions.

In any event, returning to the thing in the text of the Third Secret that was brought to my attention and that really bothers me.

Here is the whole text.  The part in question is in bold.

“I write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy Mother and mine. After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendor that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: “Penance, Penance, Penance!” And we saw in an immense light that is God: “something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it,” a bishop dressed in white. “We had the impression that it was the Holy Father.” Other bishops, priests, men and women religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other bishops, priests, men and women religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two angels each with a crystal aspergillum in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.

What bothers me?  Not the part about persecution.  That’s a given.

Note that reference to seeing an image like to that of an image in a mirror.

When you see someone pass in front of a mirror, you see two of them, the real one and the image.  Two.

Hence, in this case, the vision involved seeing two figures dressed in white, one being the real one and the other being the image of the real one.  And, according to the description, Lúcia says she saw whom she took to be the Pope and a figure that was not the Pope but an image like the Pope.

One figure the Pope and the other, close by, as in a mirror, not the Pope but looking like the Pope.

 

Posted in Benedict XVI, Francis, Our Solitary Boast, What are they REALLY saying? | Tagged ,
69 Comments

Wherein Fr. Rutler hits for six

Fr. George Rutler knocks it outta da park today.  Rather, he would probably prefer to have hit for six.  “Hit for six”, as he would know, is not only a good thing in cricket, but is also “to be hit for six” a figure of speech for being hit with devastating news.

HERE

“Sometimes you’re the Louisville Slugger, baby. Sometimes you’re the ball.”  (cf. Mark Knopfler)

Several veiled references to people active today are peppered through his piece.  If they aren’t knocked for six after reading this, then we have reason to question their acuity.

Rutler blasts Pollyannaism, and its often hypocritical attendant Flattery.

A couple of quotes from Rutler’s apaugasmatic offering…

Pollyanna lives on in a parallel ecclesiastical world of new springtimes, new evangelizations, second Pentecosts, conferences of “diocesan leaders” with mic’d up motivational speakers “celebrating the life and dignity of the human person”, and Falstaffian clergymen bereft of sense and burdened with unction. Catholic writers who confuse innocence with naïveté may print anodyne words that in the storms of the day become fatal to fact. They are to theology what Barney the Dinosaur is to paleontology.

I literally laughed aloud at that.

Of course, in order to identify the clergyman Rutler has in mind you have to know who Falstaff is. (cf. Shakespeare)

Here’s another…

Flattery is Pollyanna’s protocol. There even was a clergyman in the service of the pope who said that the Church “is openly ruled by an individual rather than by the authority of Scripture alone or even its own dictates of tradition plus Scripture.”

Hmmm… who could that be? Is this the same fellow, with a penchant for CTRL+C, who recently appeared on a Jesuit (whose else?) stage to promote deaconettes?

More devastating yet, Rutler continues with references to Obediah Slope and Uriah Heep, the character, not the rock band. (cf. Trollope and Dickens)

From that point, Father transitions to the three Japanese monkeys Mizaru, Kikazaru and Iwazaru, who have absolutely nothing to do with the Nairobi Trio (cf. Ernie Kovacs)

By now you have twigged to my hint. Go read it.

HERE

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
3 Comments

ASK FATHER: The “churching” of women after childbirth and the blessing of expecting mothers

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I recently had a conversation with an Episcopal priest about the approaching Feast of the Purification. He said that he would not emphasize the Churching of Women connection. There is such a ceremony in the old Episcopal Prayerbook. So it must have been a Catholic practice in the Middle Ages. Is that so? Do you know when it stopped as a regular Catholic practice? (Feminism, perhaps?)

The custom of “churching” is making a comeback.  A very good thing.

For those who don’t know, “churching” is an act of thanksgiving after child-birth, in wedlock.  The mother comes to church to receive a special blessing.

Surely the custom stems from the ancient Jewish laws about ritual purification and how 40 days after the birth of the Lord, to fulfill the Law, Mary brought the Lord to the Temple – which we celebrate at Candlemas on 2 February.

However, the “churching” of women doesn’t have anything to do with ritual purification, for that is all done with and superseded.  This is an act of thanksgiving.

How does this take place?

The woman kneels at the end of the church with a lighted candle.  The priest sprinkles her with Holy Water and recites Ps 23 and then leads her to the altar rail. He recites the Kyrie and Pater Noster with verses and responses and concludes with a prayer and blessing.

Of old, the blessing was not given to women who allowed their child to be baptized outside of the Catholic Faith.   The blessing can be given to women even if the child dies or was stillborn.

Also, it should not be done outside of a church, or a chapel where Mass is said.

Sometimes this blessing is conferred immediately after the baptism takes place, which is a reasonable time to do it.

Here is a prayer from the Rituale for “churching”:

Let us pray.

Almighty everlasting God, who by means of the blessed Virgin Mary’s childbearing has given every Christian mother joy, even in her pains of bringing forth her child; look kindly on this servant of yours who has come in gladness to your holy dwelling to offer her thanks. And grant that after this life, through the merits and prayers of that same blessed Mary, she and her child may be deemed worthy of attaining the happiness of everlasting life; through Christ our Lord.
All: Amen.

That’s the how.

How about when?

There was for a long time a FALSE idea that women were not to come to church until they came for churching.  NO!   Also, churching is not obligatory.   I can’t imagine why a woman would not want to go to church as soon as possible and to obtain this blessing.  But there is no obligation one way or another.

The Collectio Rituum for these USA there is this blessing for the child (children, I guess, if they are twins, etc., mutatis mutandis):

Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the living God, begotten before time was, yet willing to be an infant within time; who love childhood innocence; who deigned to tenderly embrace and to bless the little ones when they were brought to you; be ready with your dearest blessings for this child as he (she) journeys through life, and let no evil ways corrupt his (her) understanding. May he (she) advance in wisdom and grace with the years, and be enabled ever to please you, who are God, living and reigning with the Father, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, forever and ever.
All: Amen.

There is another prayer in the case of a still born child as well as a fine prayer for an expectant mother.

I am very happy that, as happens pretty often these days, women who are with child have been asking for the special blessing for expecting mothers.   There is a phrase in Latin in that prayer – Benedictio Mulieris Praegnantis –  which, every time I read it, blows my mind.

… custodi partem tuam, et ab omni dolo et iniuria duri hostis defende; ut obstetricante manu misericordiae tuae fetus eius ad lucem prospere veniat ac sanctae generationi servetur, …

… guard Your (unborn) individual and defend it from every evil plot and injury of the heartless enemy; so that, as the hand of Your mercy is working like a midwife, her unborn child (fetus) will favorably come to the light and be protected in a holy generating.

You can hear how the Latin, Roman mind works in that super literal version.

That image, “obstetricante manu misericordiae tuae” is spectacular.  It describes the hand of God, hence God, acting as a obstetricius or obstetrix.  The verb is obstetrico “to perform the office of a midwife”, in turn from obsto, “to stand before”.

I invite you Latin scholars out there to dig into that use of “partem“.   It seems odd to refer to the unborn child as a pars, a portion or part.  The only way to make sense of it, it seems to me, is to take it as being like the English word “party”, that is used now only in juridical contexts, for a “person”, as when the “party of the first part” and the “party of the second part” enter into a contract.   In the Rituale Romanum, describing the Sacrament of Matrimony, uses partem for individuals in the case of a Catholic marrying a non-Catholic: “Matrimonium vero inter partem catholicam et partem a catholicam extra ecclesiam…”.    Hence, there is in the prayer a way of underscoring the separate persons, mother and child.  Just some thoughts on a tricky word.  Priests ought to understand what they are saying.

But I seem to have strayed from the question.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
6 Comments

Too often TV and film directors and designers get Catholic thing wrong, absurdly so.

There are quite a few churchy things in TV and film these days.   For example, the intellectually insulting Two Popes (absurd on the face of it) and the weird and often vile sequel The New Pope.

Also, churchy things are often on TV series as part of the plot.  For example, on one of the only shows I follow, Blue Bloods, priests or bishops appear.

It is amazing how these directors and producers get wrong.   They get things so wrong that you want to throw things at the screen.  They even get casting wrong, as in the case of The Irishman.  What a joke. I won’t be seeing that.

I saw this tweet after a reader sent it to me, with some question marks.

First, this is probably some C of E thing, but that doesn’t make any difference.

Talk about getting this wrong.   The actor has the chasuble on BACKWARDS, the back in front.

How stupid is this.

 

Posted in You must be joking! |
22 Comments

Your Good News

It has been too long since I have asked about your good news.   What’s up?  Are there good things going on that you would like to share with the readership?

For my part, I going to work on some Hebrew.   Also, I had a great tech consult this morning about using a password manager.  Moreover, I received a few more notes from people who explained how the blog has helped them.

Now I need to fight off a cold I picked up.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
10 Comments

Death, #KobeBryant, and You

You will hear a great deal in the next few days about the early death of basketball star Kobe Bryant, who seems to have been a practicing Catholic.   It might even bump some impeachment coverage off the waves.

A death like this is very sad.  We should say a prayer for him and his closest.

His death will seem sadder to many because of his fame.

YOU are no less valuable to God, no less desired by Him for heaven than the late Mr. Bryant.

Sudden death happens.  It happens to quite a lot of people, as a matter of fact.

Bluntly, if sudden, unforeseen, death happened to Kobe Bryant, it can easily happen to you.

Just look the wrong way at the wrong moment.

Some deaths are foreseen or predictable or made more likely by circumstances.  One universal circumstance is that every single one of us is going to die.  The question is when and how, not if.

Will it be slow?  Will it be swift?  Will we know when it’s coming?  Will we have no advance warning?  Will we be aware or wholly unaware?

One of the most poignant and important petitions in the Litany of Saints is our plea to God is:

A subitanea et improvisa morte, libera nos, Domine.

From a sudden and unprovided death, save us, O Lord.

Sudden death is one thing.   It can be a grace, as opposed to a long, drawn out agony.   On the other hand, for some people the long agony is a grace, for it gives them the chance to repent and offer their suffering in reparation for their sins.

So, sudden or foreseen or long or quick… that’s one thing.

Unprovided is another. 

An “unprovided” death is a death without access to the last sacraments, especially absolution from a priest.

That’s a scary thought…. especially if you haven’t been to confession for a  long time.

When did you last go to confession?

Dear readers, one of the main reason I put myself into this blog, my force multiplier, is because every single one of you is going to die.  I want every one of you to enjoy the happiness of heaven.  Some of you, however, haven’t darkened the door of a confessional for a long time.  I tremble for you.

I beg you.

GO TO CONFESSION.

It might be your last.

 

Posted in Cri de Coeur, GO TO CONFESSION | Tagged , ,
23 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes: 3rd after Epiphany (TLM) & 3rd Ordinary (NO) 2020

Was there a good point made in the sermon you heard at the Mass that fulfilled your Sunday Obligation? What was it? There are a lot of people who don’t get many good points in the sermons they must endure.

For my part… I riffed on the “Domine non sum dignus” prayer for a while.

NB: You can probably tell that I am coming down with something.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
7 Comments

VIDEO: Doing something

I really like this.

Believe me. I’ve said that graffiti splatters should be publicly beaten.

This is another thing.

These guys are making better art with spray cans than most of the other “icon” work I’ve seen. Some of the images are truly arresting.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Our Solitary Boast |
10 Comments

My View For Awhile: Staunton Edition

There are certain things that one chooses for his “daily carry”. You can guess at a couple of the things I always carry.

Did your guess include…

Why carry this all the time?

CNA reported that a car crossed a center-line and ran straight into the bus carrying students from Covington.  The driver died.

What is it about Covington and the March for Life?

The CNA report says:

Witnesses told WLWT that a priest on the bus gave the driver of the car a final blessing.

Fortunate driver, to have a priest there.

I had to give last rites several times on Roman streets, once on a train track.  In other words, in emergencies out and around, not in ER’s or hospices.

From a sudden and unprovided death, save us O Lord.

Since today I had some time to kill between my check out time at the club and my check in for the flight back to Mad City, I was pleased to have been able to sit down and play a little chess with their chess club.   It was really fun.

I like those classic vinyl beige and green boards with the clean Staunton pieces.

I haven’t played much chess… well, virtually any chess for the last, say, four decades.  This group is pretty new, and they meet every other week.  Nice people, there were both men and women.   I was offered a game right away, with a generous hour clock.   All in all over a couple hours I split my games and watched one wrap up.

UPDATE:

On my way into the airport lounge I was handed a little bag-let for the Lunar New Year.

There are some candies and what I fear is really a “platitude cookie” disguised as a fortune cookie.

Let’s find out.

UPDATE:

It wasn’t as bad as I feared it would be.

What is the force, I wonder, of that “You do not…”.   Is that futurity?   Is this, in fact, a fortune cookie and not a mere platitude cookie?

I think it would be a hoot to start up a fortune cookie company and write the messages… ominous things, in cookies died black with squid ink.  “Watch your back today!”   “Don’t forget.  It could make all the difference.”   “Are you sure you’re healthy?”  “You didn’t check your math, but others did.”  “Tell her she has to stop doing it.”  And my favorite… “RUN!!!” Enigmatic and yet unsettling.

Perhaps you have ideas.

UPDATE:

My ride this afternoon.   Good ol’ N361NW.  An A320-212.   I’ve been upgraded.

You can see the Capitol dome on the horizon.

 

 

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
11 Comments