“Learn to love as I love thee.”

1403 Nativity Conrad_von_SoestReal Epiphany was on 6 January.  In the traditional calendar, however, we are in the Season of Epiphany.  Hence, I’ll go on talking about Epiphany for a while.

At one of the blogs I now eagerly follow, A Clerk of Oxford, I read a beautiful poem from the 14th century but in modern spelling.  You can read more detail about the original over there.

Note well that this Christmas poem (still appropriate for Epiphany) is a dialogue of the Christ Child and Mary.  Christ starts in the first stanza and Mary follows through.

[Infant Christ] Learn to love as I love thee.
In all my limbs thou mayest see
How sore they quake for cold;
For thee I suffer all this woe,
Love me, sweet, and no mo; [no other]
To thee me take and hold.

[Mary] Jesu, sweet son dear,
In poor bed thou liest now here,
And that grieveth me sore.
For thy cradle is a bier,
Ox and ass are thy fere, [companions]
Weep may I therefore!

Jesu, sweet, be not wroth;
I have neither scrap nor cloth
Thee in for to fold;
I have but a piece of a lappe, [the skirt of a garment]
Therefore lay thy feet to my pap
And keep thee from the cold.

Cold thee taketh, I may well see;
For love of man it must be
For thee to suffer woe;
For better it is thou suffer this
Than man should lose heaven’s bliss.
Thou must ransom him thereto.

Since it must be that thou be dead
To save man from the fiend,
Thy sweet will be done.
But let me not stay here too long:
After thy death me underfonge [receive]
To live for evermore. Amen.

How about that first line, Christ speaking to Mary and, in her, to us?

Posted in Christmas and Epiphany, Poetry |
2 Comments

OLDIE POST: What was the Star of Bethlehem?

In the older, traditional calendar, and in the tradition of both East and West from the earliest days, Friday 6 January was Epiphany.  However, we are now in the time after Epiphany.

I want to remind the readership of a cool DVD (sent to me last a couple years back by a reader) and website wherein a good argument is made about the Star of Bethlehem.

What was the Star of Bethlehem, anyway?

Surely it is a fact. It happened. But what happened?

This is the best explanation I have seen, and it is compelling.  It is offered by a Christian lawyer who examined all the available evidence from Scripture and added to it historical information from other ancient sources.  He also used spiffy software to recreate the motions of the planets during a period of time around Christ’s birth as viewed from the Holy Land.  This is also, therefore, an argument about the date of Christ’s birth… with some help from God’s big celestial clock, this solar system and view of the greater created cosmos.

HINT: An ancient manuscript copying error made a huge difference!

His presentation is available online HERE. Check it out. It’s fascinating. I won’t spoil the fun of drilling into it.

HINT: It was not a comet.

It’s on YouTube:

Posted in Just Too Cool, Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged ,
8 Comments

If “2+2” can equal “5” in theology, then it can also equal “9” and “catfish”

The other day, Jesuit Fr. Antonio Spadaro, who associates himself very closely with the Holy Father, tweeted this:

Antics like Cameli’s [HERE] can only be topped by Jesuit Fr. Antonio Spadaro’s tweet yesterday.

Spadaro ran into a buzz saw with this one, I’m afraid.

Go over to CWR and check out Carl Olsen’s demolition of Spadaro’s dreamy antic.

Olsen got Spadaro’s unwritten point right away:

Fr. Spadaro was apparently trying to make a point about certain theologians who are supposedly too rigid, dogmatic, or scholastic in their approaches to complex or difficult moral situations. A number of folks responded to his tweet, pointing out, in essence, that it was wrong, vapid, and otherwise embarrassing.

[…]

Olsen goes on to explain the incoherence of the nominalist tweet. He concludes … but you should go see the whole piece and savor it…

If “2+2” can equal “5” in the realm of theology, then it can also equal “9” and “catfish” and “?” and just about anything you want it to. More than a considered belief that there are exceptions to “the rules”, this is an irrational belief that “the rules” are essentially arbitrary and without objective, transcendent basis. And that is #arecipefordisaster.

Posted in Liberals, Lighter fare, You must be joking! | Tagged , ,
54 Comments

TIsk… tisk… look at all those traditional hats! Fancy vestments! Gold! Tradition!

I am watching a live stream on Russian TV of the Christmas Divine Liturgy.  The feed started in the Moscow Cathedral and then cut to Vladimir Putin’s church, where he seemed to be following the prayers attentively.  Then it returned to Moscow and Patriarch Kiril.

A couple observations.  First, the liturgy is at midnight and not at 9:30.

Next…. look at all those CROWNS!  Look at all that GOLD!  What’s with all that tradition and rigid adherence to the way it has always been?
17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_14

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_01

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_02

Meanwhile… back at the dacha…

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_03

And back to Moscow…

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_04

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_05

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_06

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_07

I suppose some people will want to titter at all this and suggest that it somehow isn’t manly.

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_08

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_12

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_13

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_17

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_18

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_19

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_21

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_22

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_23

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_24

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_25

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_26

Lots more singing and then they closed the doors.  They closed the doors and the TV feed of what was going on was suspended!

Our Rite and theirs manifest the apophatic dimension of worship: at certain times your senses must be deprived.  In the East you see certain things at certain times, and your view is obscured.  The same goes for the West.  Showing everything all the time to everyone eviscerates our rites.

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_27

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_28

17_01_06_Russia_Xmas_29

Posted in Both Lungs, Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
48 Comments

Card. Napier: Communion for the divorced and remarried? How about Polygamists?

The Archbishop of Durban, South Africa, Wilfred Card. Napier, a hero in the Synods on the Family, has opined on Twitter:

Yes… he gets it.

The Five Dubia of the Four Cardinals are important because they seek clarity about the the perennial teaching of the Church not just about the issue of Communion for the divorced and remarried, but about a whole slate of serious questions that touch on the nature of moral acts, what the Sacraments are, who Christ is.

UPDATE:

See the Catholic Herald piece HERE

Posted in One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Synod | Tagged ,
19 Comments

What Do The Little Dots Really Say? Drilling into a distortion at America Magazine

UPDATE 7 Jan:

Catch Fr. Hunwicke’s comments.  HERE

___ Originally Published on: Jan 6, 2017

Sometimes libs try to pull one over on us by shaking and rattling the shiny object so that you don’t see what they are doing with their other hand.

Such is the case today at Jesuit-run America Magazine.  There the unwitting reader will surely not be able to avoid a piece by a priest from Chicago, Fr. Louis J. Cameli, who takes on the Four Cardinals and the Five Dubia.

Let’s drill.

First, Cameli denies the obvious and claims that there really isn’t anything unclear about Amoris laetitia Chapter 8.  This is nonsense.  AL 8 has content which is objectively unclear.

Next, Cameli accuses the Four Cardinals of being dishonest.  According to Cameli, the Five Dubia are not genuine doubts or questions, but rather assertions.  However, even if assertions are within the Dubia, they remain honest questions about the magisterial status of Veritatis Splendor, etc., which can easily be answered by a “yes” or a “no”.

Then, Fr. Cameli begins his own defense of Amoris laetitia 8.  There are several points which we might look at over the next couple days, but let’s start with how he handles one of his most important proof texts.

Cameli pits St. John XXIII and his opening speech, “Gaudet Mater Ecclesia” at the Second Vatican Council against the Four Cardinals, whom he has already accused of being disingenuous.

I don’t think we should allow St. John XXIII’s words and the Second Vatican Council to be so abused.

Watch how the meaning of Gaudet Mater Ecclesia is completely changed by the cuts Cameli makes.  Read these side by side, taking note of the ellipses (those are the little dots…):

GME 6 used by Cameli GME 6 more accurately translated GME 6 Original Latin
The salient point of this Council is not…a discussion of one article or another of the fundamental doctrine of the Church which has repeatedly been taught by the Fathers and by ancient and modern theologians, and which is presumed to be well known and familiar to all. The salient point of this Council is not, therefore, a discussion of one article or another of the fundamental doctrine of the Church which has repeatedly been taught by the Fathers and by ancient and modern theologians, and which is presumed to be well known and familiar to all. 

 

Neque opus nostrum, quasi ad finem primarium, eo spectat, ut de quibusdam capitibus praecipuis doctrinae ecclesiasticae disceptetur, atque adeo fusius repetantur ea, quae Patres ac theologi veteres et recentiores tradiderunt, et quae a vobis non ignorari sed in mentibus vestris inhaerere merito putamus.
For this a Council was not necessary

[HERE HE LEAVES A BUNCH OF STUFF OUT]

 

 

the Christian, Catholic, and apostolic spirit of the whole world expects a step forward toward doctrinal penetration and a formation of consciousness in faith and perfect conformity to authentic doctrine….

[HERE HE LEAVES MORE STUFF OUT]

 

For this a council was not necessary. But from the renewed, serene and tranquil adherence to all the teaching of the Church in its entirety and preciseness, as it still shines forth in the acts of the Council of Trent and the First Vatican Council, the Christian, Catholic and apostolic spirit of the whole world expects a step forward toward a doctrinal penetration and a formation of consciences in faithful and perfect conformity to the authentic doctrine which, however, should be studied and expounded through the methods of research and through the literary forms of modern thought. Etenim ad huiusmodi tantum disputationes habendas non opus erat, ut Concilium Oecumenicum indiceretur. Verumtamen in praesenti oportet ut universa doctrina christiana, nulla parte inde detracta, hic temporibus nostris ab omnibus accipiatur novo studio, mentibus serenis atque pacatis, tradita accurata illa ratione verba concipiendi et in formam redigendi, quae ex actis Concilii Tridentini et Vaticani Primi praesertim elucet; oportet ut, quemadmodum cuncti sinceri rei christianae, catholicae, apostolicae fautores vehementer exoptant, eadem doctrina amplius et altius cognoscatur eaque plenius animi imbuantur atque formentur; oportet ut haec doctrina certa et immutabilis, cui fidele obsequium est praestandum, ea ratione pervestigetur et exponatur, quam tempora postulant nostra.
The substance of the ancient doctrine of the deposit of faith is one thing, and the way in which it is presented is another.

[HE LEAVES CRITICALLY IMPORTANT STUFF OUT THIS TIME, AND WITHOUT THE ELLIPSES]

 

The substance of the ancient doctrine of the deposit of faith or the truths which are contained in our time-honored teaching is one thing, the manner in which these truths are set forthin the same meaning and understanding – is another. Est enim aliud ipsum depositum Fidei, seu veritates, quae veneranda doctrina nostra continentur, aliud modus, quo eaedem enuntiantur, eodem tamen sensu eademque sententia.
And it is the latter that must be taken into great consideration with patience if necessary, everything being measured in the forms and proportions of a magisterium which is predominantly pastoral in character [emphases added]. And it is the latter that must be taken into great consideration, with patience if necessary, everything being measured in the forms and proportions of a magisterium which is predominantly pastoral in character.” Huic quippe modo plurimum tribuendum erit et patienter, si opus fuerit, in eo elaborandum; scilicet eae inducendae erunt rationes res exponendi, quae cum magisterio, cuius indoles praesertim pastoralis est, magis congruant.

Cameli made these cuts not simply because he had a word limitation on his article.  He wanted to diminish the stress that St. John XXIII placed on continuity between the Second Vatican Council and earlier Catholic teaching, including Trent and Vatican I.

We shall have to look at more of this piece in the days to come.

Posted in Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, What are they REALLY saying?, You must be joking! | Tagged , , , , , ,
12 Comments

ASK FATHER: Friday penance on 6 January where Epiphany is transferred

The Unwise Men, heading off to Sunday.

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Hi Father Z,

I’m confused about this Friday and the obligation to do penance this Friday. Our Bishops’ Conference (Canada) transferred the Feast of Epiphany to the Sunday, but we who follow the 1962 Calendar observe it on the Friday. Does that mean we still have to do penance on Friday, since the Bishops officially moved the Feast Day to Sunday, or are we exempt because we’re celebrating Epiphany on the Friday? I’m confused. Please help.

If the Canadian bishops where you are (Canadia) have determined – contrary to tradition – to anoint the intentional euthanizing of Epiphany and it to Sunday (which is already a day of obligation), then Friday is no longer a “Solemnity”.

Only a Solemnity ranks high enough to suppress the obligation for penance. Therefore, you are obliged on Friday to do penance, even though it is traditional Epiphany.

Even if you attend an Extraordinary Form Mass (or perhaps some Eastern Rite Divine Worship) celebrating the Epiphany on Friday, then 6 January is not a Solemnity in these USA or in Canadia … unless your parish is dedicated to St. Andre Bessette… no, wait, St. Andre Bessette in Canada is, I think, on 7 January… too bad.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
22 Comments

WDTPRS – Epiphany Collect: transformed by the beauty of Your sublime glory

In the Novus Ordo calendar Epiphany (which is supposed to be 12 days after Christmas – the reason it is called “Twelfth Night”) is sometimes moved to the Sunday.  I suppose that they reasoned that more people would celebrate the important feast that way.  I say that 1) that signals that bishops think that our obligations according to the religion of virtue aren’t that important, 2) the liturgical year isn’t that important, and 3) parishes lose a collection.

In the ancient Western Church and in the East, Epiphany was more important than the relative latecomer Christmas.  Epiphany is from the Greek word for a divine “manifestation” or “revelation”.  There are many “epiphanies” of God in the Scripture.  Think, for example, of the burning bush encountered by Moses.

The Latin Church’s antiphons for Vespers reflect the tradition that Epiphany was thought to be not only the day the Magi came to adore Christ, but also the same day years later when He changed water into wine at Cana, and also when He was baptized by St. John in the Jordan.  In each mysterious event, Jesus was revealed to be more than a mere man: He is man and God.

The Epiphany Collect was in the 1962 Missale Romanum and in ancient sacramentaries.

Deus, qui hodierna die Unigenitum tuum stella duce revelasti, concede propitius, ut qui iam te ex fide cognovimus, usque ad contemplandam speciem tuae celsitudinis perducamur.

Stella duce is an ablative absolute.  The adjective hodiernus means “of this day, today’s”.  In older Latin, celsitudo is “lofty carriage of the body”. In later Latin it is used like the title “Highness”.  In our liturgical context it is a divine attribute, God’s transcendent grandeur, glory.

SUPER LITERAL VERSION:

O God, who on this very day revealed your Only-begotten, a star as the guide, graciously grant, that we, who have already come to know You by faith, may be led all the way unto the beauty of Your glory to be contemplated.

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

Father, you revealed your Son to the nations by the guidance of a star. Lead us to your glory in heaven by the light of faith.

NEW CORRECTED ICEL (2011):

O God, who on this day revealed your Only Begotten Son to the nations by the guidance of a star, grant in your mercy, that we, who know you already by faith, may be brought to behold the beauty of your sublime glory.

In Latin prayers species (three syllables) often means “beauty”. It is also a technical, philosophical term about the way the human intellect apprehends things.  Species has to do with the relationship between the thing known and our knowing power.  A species transforms the mind of the one perceiving a thing.  The object we consider acts upon our power of knowing.  Simultaneously, the knowing power acts upon the object known.  Our knowing power’s active and passive aspects meet in the species and the object of our consideration is known directly, without intermediaries.  Easy.

This is what we are praying for, hoping for, living our earthly lives for: to see God face to face, directly and immediately.

In this life we know God only indirectly, by faith, our reason aided by the authority of revelation and by grace.  This is St. Paul’s “dark glass” (1 Cor 13:12) through which we peer toward Him in longing.

Christ is the visible image of the invisible God. He is the Father’s Beauty. He is Truth and Beauty and Glory itself.

St. Hilary of Poitiers (d 367) conceived God’s divine attribute of glory as a transforming power which divinizes us by our contact with it.  After Moses talked with God in the tent of the Ark, he wore a veil over his face, which became too bright to look at.  We pray today, literally, to be brought “all the way to the beauty of glory (species celsitudinis)” of God “which is to be contemplated”.  His beauty will act on us, increase our knowledge of Him and, therefore, our love for Him … for all eternity.   We will be, all the more, the images He intended.

Christ could be understood to be the species celsitudinis of this prayer. Contemplate His truth and beauty.  Christ is the true speaker and spoken truth of every prayer of every Mass.

If eternal Beauty transforms us, “divinizes” us, then beauty in this life changes us too.

Could a fostering of beauty in our churches help us reach people today in a way that arguments or other appeals may not?

Our liturgical worship of the Most High God must lead us to encounter beauty, truth, transcendent mystery.  Holy Mass requires the finest architecture, vestments, music – everything – we can summon from human genius, love and labor.  What we sing and say and do in church, and the church itself, ought to presage the liturgy of heaven, where the Church Triumphant enjoys already the Beatific Vision.  Liturgy should be “epiphany”, wherein we encounter transforming mystery.

Let us celebrate every Mass in such a way that we become shoeless Moses before the burning bush which is never consumed.  Let Mass make us Magi with sight and mind fixed in longing upon the beautiful, true and yet speechless Word, in whom transcendent glory was both hidden and revealed.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS | Tagged , , , , , ,
1 Comment

“Let y’all know!” The “Noveritis” Epiphany chant announcement of 2017’s liturgical dates

Screen Shot 2017-01-02 at 08.54.48Someone posted a printable image of the Noveritis (“Let y’all know”) in Gregorian chant notation for the singing of the liturgical dates for 2016 which takes place at Epiphany after the Gospel.  Find it over there.

BE WARNED: At that site is also posted a version transfers the celebration of Ascension Thursday and Corpus Christi Thursday to Sundays which is a rather dreadful thing to do.  The REAL Noveritis is provided without those aberrations.  HERE

A sheet you can pass out with the text and translation, HERE

The singing of the key liturgical dates in a solemn way, underscores how these dates and seasons are all interconnected, how the liturgical year is a reflection of and on the mystery of our salvation.  Some liturgical dates are movable.  For example Septuagesima, in 2017 12 February (in 2016 24 January) doesn’t fall on the same date every year because the date of Easter changes each year.

“But Father! But Father!”, you libtards are surely sputtering.  “What does this chant sound like? Do it in English like the Spirit of Vatican II wanted!   But you won’t because YOU HATE VATICAN II!”

Here is what it sounds like, in case some deacon or priest out there, less familiar with chant, wants to give it a shot.  It sounds rather like the Exultet, sung at the Easter Vigil.  The Noveritis is a little awkward, however.

What Does The Prayer Really Sound Like?

I’ll allow you to post your own, flawless, accurate and yet smooth English translations.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, PRAYERCAzT: What Does The (Latin) Prayer Really Sound L | Tagged , , ,
4 Comments

Just For Fun

Here is a detail of a work now in Boston dating to about 1340 by Barna da Siena, The Mystical Marriage of St. Catherine.   At the bottom, there are depicted a few saints, including this lovely rendering of St. Margaret beating the Devil with a hammer.

It cheers me up every time I see it.

17_01_05_Barna_da_Sienna_S_Margaret_devil_hammer_det

This is what we do when we…

GO TO CONFESSION!

So….

GO TO CONFESSION!

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION | Tagged ,
2 Comments