Learn from Luther… and kneel to receive Holy Communion!

The brilliant Fr. Hunwicke has a keen eye.

To wit:

Learning from Luther

Cardinal Marx believes in learning from Luther. Today, Rorate publishes a nice early engraving of Lutherans receiving Holy Communion into their mouths, and kneeling.

Nuff’ said.

Here is the image.

Cranach_Luther

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged , ,
7 Comments

Assessing the importance of stuff that happens

This struck me as useful for assessing the hic et nunc:

15_01_01_xkcd_worrying

Posted in Lighter fare, The Drill | Tagged
2 Comments

VIDEO: Online Gregorian Chant course!

My good friend Fr. Eduard Perrone of mighty Assumption Grotto, that liturgical oasis in troubled Detroit, is a fine musician.  He is putting his extensive training and experience to work with social media.

Here is the first installment of a video series to help people learn…

GREGORIAN CHANT!

NB: This is done in coordination with Church Militant, which is Michael Voris’ intiative. Michael is in Detroit and goes to Assumption Grotto. It is premium content, btw. I don’t have access to Church Militant’s premium content… even though I’ve been on his radio show and… but… okay, now I get it. I did some hard-hitting investigative reporting about them. That must be the reason.

Never mind.

See my…

SECRET WDTPRSNEWS INVESTIGATIVE REPORT: Fr. Z with Michael Voris at the Church Militant studio!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
7 Comments

ASK FATHER: Revealing tops and dresses… dress code?

People-in-their-Sunday-Best-GettyFrom a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Do you think there should be a dress code for attending Mass? I am talking about girls and women wearing shorts and revealing tops and dresses?

It would be a bad idea to have a dress code at Holy Mass, especially one where girls and women would be required to wear shorts and revealing tops and dresses. If it were required for females to wear shorts and revealing tops and dresses, it would be very difficult to distinguish church from the supermarket, the mall, ball park, or almost any other venue.

As a priest, I might end up forgetting that I’m at church and, instead of reciting the prayers at the foot of the altar, I might start looking around for the concession stand. In colder climates, requiring shorts would be very difficult for those women who have become accustomed to wearing jeans, quilted jackets, and baseball caps, just like their brothers.

But seriously, fashions change over time, which is why enforcing a dress code would be nigh on impossible. We would have to pick a particular moment in the evolution of fashion and determine that it is optimal and beyond improvement, as our Amish friends and certain Old Calendar Russian Orthodox have done, not to mention some homeschool groups.

What has been the practice for centuries is the concept of wearing your “Sunday best” for Holy Mass, on Sundays and Holy Days. Wear what you would wear if you were going out to a nice restaurant (with tablecloths, silverware, and without plastic cups and a serve-yourself soda station).   Rather, wear what you ought to wear to such a restaurant.

If you were to have a private meeting with the President, or – better – someone respectable such as Pope Emeritus Benedict, what would you wear?

Why not wear that for an audience with the King of Heaven?

Outside of schools and certain work environments, dress codes are probably not the best way of enforcing any sort of dress code.

Perhaps public embarrassment would do the trick? From lay person to lay person. “Oh my dear. I hate to be the one to tell you this, but I do believe that you forgot to put a dress on over your slip this morning. Oh. That IS the dress you intended to wear? Oh. Well, pardon me then. You might want to talk to Sr. Euphrasia, she has some very nice second hand things folks have donated if you can’t afford a complete outfit.”

You get the idea.  Once again, it’s about decorum.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Decorum, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
50 Comments

What did Pope Francis really say?

I had the chance finally to review, to listen to, Pope Francis sermon for 1 January, Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God.  It was interesting especially because I had first reviewed the written text that was released in the Bolletino (and was released before Mass under embargo).

However, it is always necessary to verify a text against what was actually spoken.  Most of the time, small changes make little difference.

This time, however, there was a variation that caught my ear, because it seemed a departure from how Francis usually speaks.

CONTEXT: The paragraph about the unity of Christ and the Church, and then Mary as Mother of the Church, in the official English translation from the Bolletino. My emphasis for the part that interests me:

Likewise inseparable are Christ and the Church – because the Church and Mary are always together and this is precisely the mystery of womanhood in the ecclesial community – and the salvation accomplished by Jesus cannot be understood without appreciating the motherhood of the Church. To separate Jesus from the Church would introduce an “absurd dichotomy”, as Blessed Paul VI wrote (Evangelii Nuntiandi, 16). It is not possible “to love Christ but without the Church, to listen to Christ but not the Church, to belong to Christ but outside the Church” (ibid.). For the Church is herself God’s great family, which brings Christ to us. Our faith is not an abstract doctrine or philosophy, but a vital and full relationship with a person: Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God who became man, was put to death, rose from the dead to save us, and is now living in our midst. Where can we encounter him? We encounter him in the Church, in our hierarchical, Holy Mother Church. It is the Church which says today: “Behold the Lamb of God”; it is the Church, which proclaims him; it is in the Church that Jesus continues to accomplish his acts of grace which are the sacraments.

The Italian official text of the part I emphasized:

Dove lo possiamo incontrare? Lo incontriamo nella Chiesa.

Note that there is no “hierarchical” in the official Italian (“Where can we encounter him? We encounter him in the Church.”), though in the official English there is.

The English version is correct.  Pope Francis stuck in a few words that were not in his written text (as released).  The English version was updated, and the Italian was not.  The French updated the text.  The German updated the text.  The Spanish does NOT update the text, and it lacks “hierarchical”.  Portuguese does NOT update.  The Polish updated.

I am not sure what’s up with that.

However, my mind flits back to how the Synod’s Relatio post disceptationem was swiftly translated into several language in a matter of hours, and distributed, but somehow the Relatio Synodi has encountered problems.

Pope Francis, who has clearly taken a populist tone, doesn’t talk about his role as “Pope”, preferring to emphasize “Bishop of Rome”.  Except, of course, at the end of the Synod in October, when he hammered the point that he is Pope.  He tends to play down, and, it must be said, even run down the Church’s hierarchy, as is evident from his daily, non-Magisterial fervorini during Mass and during his 2014 Christmas Address to the Roman Curia.

Therefore, when I heard Pope Francis say, clearly, ” Lo incontriamo nella Chiesa… nella nostra santa Madre Chiesa gerarchica.”

It isn’t a big deal for a Pope to say that the Church is “hierarchical”.  That’s part of our Catholic Faith, though it is downplayed or left in silence by some of our catholic brethren.  It isn’t unusual for a Pope to say something that the Second Vatican Council clearly taught in Lumen gentium, ch. 3.  However, it did perk up my ear this time, given the present environment.  This could be of more interest for the quality control of translations and actually getting what the Pope says, than what he says.

UPDATE:

I received this from a Jesuit reader with my emphases:

I, too, was struck by Pope Francis’ use of the term “nostra santa Madre Chiesa gerarchica.” It is an expression that St. Ignatius uses towards the end of his Spiritual Exercises at the beginning of the “Rules for Thinking, Judging, and Feeling with the Church”:  [NB: When Francis talks about “sentire cum Ecclesia”, he means something other than what the LCWR nuns thought!]

353: The First Rule. With all judgment of our own put aside, we ought to keep our minds disposed and ready to be obedient in everything to the true Spouse of Christ our Lord, which is our holy Mother the hierarchical Church.

In the edition of the Spiritual Exercises I am using (by George E. Ganss, S.J., of the Institute of Jesuit Sources) the footnote to the section suggests that this view of the Church as hierarchical fits well with Ignatius’ vision of the Society organized with strong superiors.  The other 17 rules follow from this first rule, for example, the 13th:

“To keep ourselves right in all things, we ought to hold fast to this principle: What seems to me to be white, I will believe to be black if the hierarchical Church thus determines it. For we believe that between Christ our Lord, the Bridegroom, and the Church, his Spouse, there is the one same Spirit who governs and guides us for the salvation of our souls. For it is by the same Spirit and Lord of ours who gave the ten commandments that our Holy Mother Church is guided and governed.”

Fr. Manuel Ruiz Jurado, S.J., a former president of the Institute of Spirituality at the Pontifical Gregorian Institute, sees these Rules as the transference of the exercitant’s love and allegiance for Jesus, which has been prayed for and strengthened during the month of the Exercises, to the visible Church, Christ’s living spouse and body. [For the Greater Glory of God: A Spiritual Retreat with St. Ignatius. The Word Among Us Press, 2002. pp 190-193.]

Really helpful!

Posted in Francis, The Drill | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2015

Fr. Z’s Prediction for 2015

1. The Synod of Bishops on the Family will be rigged and explosive.
2. The “AFFORDABLE” Care Act will continue to flop and to be unpopular.
3. The number of places in which Extraordinary Form (TLM) Masses are offered will continue to grow.
4. Pope Francis will be welcomed in these USA with hysterical enthusiasm.
5. Curial Reform will continue to meet significant resistance.
6. Pope Francis will release his next encyclical at the United Nations.
7. There will be more cyber-attacks on corporations and government entities.
8. Mass attendance will continue to decline.
9. Former-Father Greg Reynolds will still be excommunicated.
10. Fr. Z will still not be a Monsignor.

How did I do last year?

Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2014

1. Israel will attack Iran (still waiting for this one) [-1]
2. SCOTUS will rule in favor of the Bishops on the HHS Mandate (still waiting on this too) [-1]
3. The “AFFORDABLE” Care Act will continue to flop and be unpopular. [+1]
4. The number of places in which Extraordinary Form (TLM) Masses are offered will continue to grow. [+1]
5. The Canonization of Popes John and John Paul will see the largest crowds in history gathered in Rome. [-1]
6. Emeritus Pope Benedict XVI will attend the canonization Mass. [+1]
7. Curial Reform will not make significant progress. [+1]
8. The Extraordinary Synod of Bishops on the family will leave people wondering why they bothered. [-1]
9. Former-Father Greg Reynolds will still be excommunicated. [+1]
10. Fr. Z will still not be a Monsignor. [+1]

 

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
19 Comments

Fr. Z’s Blog 2014 Person of the Year

  • Whereas His Eminence is a fierce and constant defender and promoter of justice for all parties in service of the Truth,
  • Whereas His Eminence willingly celebrates Holy Mass in the Extraordinary Form,
  • Whereas His Eminence is kind to children,
  • Whereas His Eminence contributes to scholarly books in defense of Holy Matrimony,
  • Whereas His Eminence humbly submits to the proper garb appropriate for his office and role in the Church,
  • Whereas His Eminence does not eschew the cappa magna,
  • Whereas His Eminence is from these United States of America,
  • Whereas His Eminence is going to be “papabile”,
  • Whereas His Eminence speaks in clear terms about Catholic doctrine when speaking to the press,
  • Whereas His Eminence has extensive pastoral experience,
  • Whereas His Eminence continues to support and frequent the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Wisconsin,
  • Whereas His Eminence generously spends time to travel to support new religious institutes and Catholic schools,
  • Whereas His Eminence now gives spiritual support to one of the world’s most effective charitable organizations,
  • Whereas His Eminence supports the Cause of Fr. John Hardon, SJ,
  • Whereas His Eminence sponsors an annual Canon Law Conference,
  • Whereas His Eminence participates in conferences on Sacred Liturgy and Holy Priesthood,
  • Whereas His Eminence provided unparalleled service as Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura,

Fr. Z’s Blog has named His Eminence Raymond Leo Card. Burke, Person of the Year for 2014.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
35 Comments

ASK FATHER: Who can dispense Holy Day of Obligation?

lords leapingFrom a reader…

QUAERITUR:

A friend of mine just informed me that the Solemnity of Mary isn’t [wasn’t] a Holy Day of Obligation in the whole state of California. What ecclesiastical body has the authority to grant such dispensations?

In light of can. 87 of the 1983 Code for the Latin Church, a diocesan bishop can dispense from the obligation of a particular Sunday or Holy Day.

I suppose one might wonder when such a move would be appropriate. Off the top of my head, I can imagine a scenario wherein a major earthquake has devastated a city of the diocese. In that case, the people can simply can’t get to Mass are relieved of the obligation anyway, but there may be marginal cases that are harder to decide.

BONUS QUESTION

On a related point, another person asks…

My wife and I will be traveling to Los Angeles on New Years Day and were flabbergasted to learn that Jan 1st is not a Holy Day of Obligation in the Archdiocese of LA. We have a very busy day on the 1st and were hoping to find a church with a early Mass time. This is proving impossible (many of the churches in the area we will be staying in are even closed that day)!

If you travel to a place where the obligation to attend Mass has been lifted or dispensed, you do not have an obligation to hear Mass.

You are free to lament the zeitgeist that has so confused the liturgical calendar such that Holy Days are regularly moved, suppressed, or ignored, and that has twisted the calendar so far that, for example this year, the Three Kings arrive, not on the Twelfth Night, but on the Tenth Night … therefore lifting the obligation placed on true loves from sending Ladies Dancing and Lords a’Leaping to their sweethearts this year.

But, in those places where the obligation has been legitimately lifted by the authorities who have the power to do so, there is/was no obligation.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
17 Comments

ASK FATHER: Father was sick, we went to Mass, now we’re sick too!

From a reader…

Our priest simply announced “I have the flu ” and proceeded with his sermon. Only a few , like me, refrained from receiving Holy Communion. My wife received and several days later she and I had it also. Since we are in our seventies and I am undergoing cancer treatment and many others are vulnerable to this life threatening illness it seems to me he should refrain from distribution entirely rather than recklessly infect a trusting group. What say you ?

First, I am really sorry that you have cancer.   If I had it my way, no one would have to suffer with cancer.   We can blame Eve for that.  Then blame Adam.   I am also sorry that you are ill.  Blame Eve.  Etc.

You have no idea where you picked up that flu bug.  No. Idea. At. All.

The priest is, however, a convenient target.

What is ironic in this is, had someone announced before Mass was scheduled to begin that Father was sick and he couldn’t make it, people would then grouse that he was coddling himself, that other people with real jobs can’t just take days off, that when parents get the flu, they still have to show up and be counted.  Or, had Father come, sick or not, then all sorts of people who were themselves sick, would then want to talk to Father about A, B or C.  They’d cough into their hands a few times and then want to shake Father’s hand after Mass, and even hang onto it for a while as they told him something.  But then when Father didn’t show for Mass the week after, because he was sick, they tisk and say that he ought to take better care of himself.

I am just getting over a nasty case of something that took me three weeks and antibiotics to shake.

Everyone… if you see that Father is ill, and you are concerned about picking up what he has, then don’t go to Communion if you are worried that that’s how diseases are transmitted, and, please, leave him alone after Mass.

Also, people are not obliged to receive Communion.  And yet so very many people today think that somehow, if they don’t go to Communion, they haven’t “been to Mass” or the haven’t “gotten anything”.  Communion is reduced to something … well… that everyone does because… well… that’s what you do.   You go forward, someone puts the white thing on your hand, and then you sing the song.  Okay… go to Communion when Father is sick and “get something”.

I repeat.  No one is obliged to go to Holy Communion.  Make a spiritual Communion.

I hope you feel better very soon.  Blessings.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
26 Comments

WaPo buried hit-and-run female Episcopalian “bishop” but highlighted Catholic lesbian Communion denial

From Newsbusters:

WashPost Buries Hit-and-Run Death Caused by Female Episcopalian Bishop; Front-Paged Catholic Lesbian Scandal

Which offense is more serious? [A] Denying a lesbian communion at a Catholic funeral? Or [B] a female Episcopalian bishop hitting and killing a bicyclist? The Washington Post has picked (A).[What a surprise.]In 2012, they splashed across the front page (with a picture) that lesbian activist Barbara Johnson was denied communion at her mother’s funeral. [Remember Fr. Guarnizo?]

On December 30, the Post [The Washington Post, that is…]buried a hit-and-run-bishop story on page B5 with the headline “Bishop put on leave after fatal crash: Episcopal diocese says Heather Cook drove car that killed bicyclist.”

The No. 2 Episcopal bishop in the Diocese of Maryland has been placed on administrative leave after she was involved in a car crash Saturday that killed a bicyclist.

Bishop Heather Elizabeth Cook, who is the bishop suffragan, or second bishop for the diocese of Maryland, which is headquartered in Baltimore, left the scene but returned later “to take responsibility for her actions,” her bishop said in a statement.

[…]

Court records show that Cook received “probation before judgment” in 2010 for a drinking and driving charge on the Eastern Shore, where she worked before becoming a bishop. She had been charged at the time with possession of marijuana paraphernalia as well. But those charges were dropped, and she successfully completed her probation. [Good candidate for “bishop”.]

On December 31, The Post ran another story on page B6 headlined “Bishop involved in fatal crash had a DUI arrest in 2010, and diocese knew.”

Leaders in the Episcopal Diocese of Maryland who this spring made Heather Elizabeth Cook a bishop – the diocese’s first female bishop – knew the ugly details of her 2010 drunk-driving arrest but determined “that this one mistake should not bar her for consideration as a leader,” the diocese said in a statement Tuesday.  [I want you, all you readers, to pause right now.  Pause for a moment.  Breathe in.  Breathe out.  Now… in the story substitute “Catholic” for “Episcopal” and “real bishop” for “pretend bishop”.  Imagine what the Washington Post would have done had this been a Catholic bishop who did a hit and run.  The national press, every sort of media, would be dancing around the chancery with torches and pig heads on spikes.]

[… lots of unpleasant details… and then…]

The Barbara Johnson [lesbian] communion scandal kept drawing stories on page B-1 or in the A-section, unlike these hit-and-run bishop stories in 2012 (not counting editorials):

March 12: Priest is placed on leave from ministry (Page B-1)
March 15: Priest disputes archdiocese’s account (Page B-1)
March 18: Two unusual Catholics create firestorm (Page A-17, 2499 words) [!]

The Washington Post also creditably stuck to the story of Rabbi Barry Freundel and his improper taping and exploitation of unclothed women in ritual baths. That’s repeatedly been a B-1 story. [QUAERITUR…]So for what reason — other than feminist ideology — is this story being buried in the back?

Interesting.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, The Drill, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , ,
14 Comments