Writing to Fr. Z

Some of you want to write to me.  GREAT!

Please use my contact forms on the top menu.  ALWAYS!

If you have some piece of news, observation, etc., use “Contact Fr. Z by EMAIL”

If you have a question for the ASK FATHER Question Box, use “ASK FATHER Question Box”

It may be that I have responded to you by email at some point in the past.  It may be that you have received a personal note of thanks from me because you sent a donation or item from my wish lists.  It may be that you will be tempted to write to me without using those forms.   Fight that temptation.

You maximize your chance that I will read and respond if you use those forms.

You greatly diminish the chance that I will read and respond if you don’t use those forms.

I get a LOT of email.  I have mail from those forms flagged to go into special folders, which I check often.  If you don’t use those forms, your notes don’t go into those folders.

I’m just sayin’.

Also, I can’t promise that I will respond to every email.  I don’t consider emails to be commands.  Also, other things may require my time.

I very much appreciate feedback.  I am especially happy to read how this blog has positively affected you.

I also have VOICEMAIL.  Check the sidebar.  Voicemails are great.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes |
Comments Off on Writing to Fr. Z

Excellent Letter for Lent from Archbp. Chaput of @ArchPhilly – Fr. Z rants, gives 3 points of advice about sin.

Excellent Letter for Lent from Archbp. Chaput of @ArchPhilly - Fr. Z rants, gives 3 points of advice about sin.

Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia has issued a great letter on the threshold of Lent.

 

As I read it, the Archbishop’s reference to the history of the Church in German with the Nazi state and the 1933 , could be not only warning about our compromises with the three perennial enemies of the soul, but also on the current compromises with the the state in China.  It also could be read as a warning about compromising with the world in the matter of Communion for the divorced and remarried.  I suspect that that wasn’t the Archbishop’s intention, but the principle he underscores can be applied to many burning contemporary issues.

Here is Caput’s letter which can be found at Catholic Philly with my emphases and comments.

Toward a deeper experience of Lent

By Archbishop Charles Chaput, O.F.M. Cap. • Posted February 13, 2018

History is a great teacher, sometimes in unusual and very personal ways. Here’s an example.

Reading the Reichskonkordat (“Reich concordat” with the German state) today, 85 years after its 1933 signing, sparks some interesting thoughts. Structured as a treaty to govern the relations between the Holy See and German government, the text is remarkably positive. It’s also thorough. As deals go, this was a good one. The state got a stable legal relationship with a well-organized, potentially troublesome, and internationally connected religious minority. The Church got protection for her people.  [It was negotiated by Eugenio Card. Pacelli and it is still in force today.]

A few problematic passages in the text do exist. Article 14.2 obliges the Church to consult the German Reich on the appointment of archbishops and coadjutors. Article 16 requires new bishops to take an oath of loyalty to the state. But details like these weren’t unknown in Europe’s historical context. The concordat’s guarantees of Church freedom to profess and practice the Catholic faith, and to pursue Catholic education and social ministries without interference, are extensive, explicit, and generous.

They were also empty. The Reich began violating the deal almost as soon as the ink on the treaty was dry. State pressure on Church life was so harsh by 1937 — just four years later — that Pius XI’s encyclical, Mit brennender Sorge (“With burning concern”) had to be smuggled into the country. It was read from all of Germany’s pulpits on Palm Sunday of that year. In it, the Holy Father condemned the Reich’s (Nazi-directed) neo-paganism, race hatred, “Aryanized” Christianity, widespread attack on human rights, and contempt for the Old Testament. In response, the state simply doubled down on its pressure.

What’s the lesson here? It’s this: If you sup with the devil (so the proverb warns), you’d better bring a long spoon. It’s probably a bad idea in the first place.  [A great proverb, and one to remember throughout Lent.  It was, by the way, already in circulation when Chaucer wrote the “Squire’s Tale”.]

But there’s more. As it is in diplomacy and politics, so it is in every person’s individual life.  [NB] The deals we make with the world, and the flesh, and the devil, always go south. The line dividing good and evil is usually — not always, but usually — pretty bright for anyone who wants to see it. Most of us really don’t want to see it, of course, because doing so would cramp our own daily behavior. We negotiate little “concordats” with our favorite personal sins, ugly habits and dictatorial appetites all the time.

If we’re constantly angry, it’s because everybody else is so unfair. If we’re hooked on porn, surely cutting back to just an hour of it every day is “better” than three. If alcohol’s the problem, four drinks is obviously “better” than six — right? For every forbidden, hurtful, dishonest thing we like to do, we’re experts at self-deceit; at training our consciences to perform like pets … well-manicured poodles that offer us alibis on demand, like:

“I didn’t have a choice;” or
“Hey, there were extenuating circumstances;” or
“The Church is out of touch;” or
“There’s a new paradigm for thinking about this particular unpleasantness;” or [Didn’t some prelate recently make a fancy fallacy laden argument about a paradigm shift?]
“I know it’s not ideal, but this is the best I could do;” or [Haven’t some compromised prelates and theologians stated that not everyone can live up to the Church’s “ideals”?]
“There’s been a revolution in Church thinking on all sorts of complex issues — like mine;” or [cf. “paradigm shift”]
“OK this is wrong, but it’s not THAT bad.”

We all have a barrel of excellent excuses. You do. I do. And we add to them all the time.

February 14 this year is Ash Wednesday, the start of Lent. It’s the day on which a loving God invites all of us to smash our miserable little concordats with sin and its alibis to bits. The teaching of the Church – rooted in the Word of God, confirmed by experience, consistent in its expression, sometimes difficult but always liberating – is the standard of holiness and the guide to our Father’s expectations. We need to cling to it, confident in God’s mercy, in judging our own actions and redirecting our lives, no matter how radically that new path demands.

So may God grant all of us a holy and fruitful Lent, and I ask you to pray for me, as I will pray for you.  [That has a familiar ring!]

Good analogy.  Great letter.

A daily examination of your conscience will help you to identify where your weak spots are and what konkordats you have made with the world, the flesh and the Devil.  Know yourself!  After you have identified them, you have to do three things.

First, make a plan.  When you notice that you are in the pattern of behavior that usually leads to committing that particular sin, kick in the plan you made beforehand about what you would do instead.  You have to know what you are going to do ahead of time.  When you see that you are on the path that ends in sins, implement the plan: “Instead of doing X, I’m going to scrub some oil stains off the floor of the garage.”

Second, resolve, even perhaps by writing it down and hanging it on the wall beneath a Crucifix, that you are willing to suffer.  When you say “No!”, you will begin to suffer.  Know it ahead of time.  Be ready for it.  Look it in the face.  Be willing to suffer.  Offer the suffering in unity with the Passion of the Lord in reparation, perhaps in accord with Our Lady’s words at Fatima.

Third, GO TO CONFESSION!   Each sacrament has its effects.  One of the effects of the Sacrament of Penance is a strengthening against sin.  Graces are offered to fight off temptations and to fulfill what you declared in the confession: amendment of life.

Today, some prelates and theologians have, in effect, denied that people are capable, with the help of God, to amend their lives.  In effect, they deny grace and God’s mercy.  

Yes, our application of mercy is important in this veil of tears, but not at the expense of truth and, therefore, heaven.  We must fix our hearts and mind on the long game.  When it comes to fulfilling the commandments God has given us and the image He wrote into us, we must be confident that God will not let us down.

What God and the Church proposes is not just a “policy” that can be changed according to the changing circumstances and trends of society.

Those who deny that God offers sufficient graces to sinners or who say that sinners cannot amend their lives, are agents of Hell.

UPDATE:

As I read I was reminded of a book about “The Lion of Munster”, Bl. Clemens August von Galen.  It also reminded one of you readers, who sent me a note.

US HERE – UK HERE

Excellent Letter for Lent from Archbp. Chaput of @ArchPhilly - Fr. Z rants, gives 3 points of advice about sin.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Fr. Z KUDOS, GO TO CONFESSION, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , ,
4 Comments

ASK FATHER: Why can lay people read at Mass?

ASK FATHER: Why can lay people read at Mass?From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

My family goes to EF Masses on Sundays most of the time, but Novus Ordo once
a month.

My 3-year-old son asked me a question which I have no answer. He asked, “Why is the reading done by people but not the priest?” He asked this because in usus antiquior, the readings must be done by the priest, the assisting sub-deacon, or the clergy in choir. Reading done by laity is a complete novelty for my 3-year-old.

I know it is allowed in the Novus Ordo, but I really could not answer “why” it is allowed. Is there any good reason other than “The spirit of Vatican II allowed active participation”?

Fr. Z responds: Even a 3 year old can see it.

GUEST PRIEST RESPONSE: Fr. Tim Ferguson

In the early Church, there were many liturgical offices, all performed by men in the clerical state. Porters stood guard over the doors of the church, lest non-Christians sneak in. Acolytes attended the major ministers, brought the bread and wine to be consecrated to the priest, and handled the books. Lectors read the lessons and epistles. Cantors or psalmists chanted the psalms. Eventually, by the Middle Ages, a “cursus honorum” had developed with clear steps leading from one office to the next. Young men in the clerical state would be ordained as porters, then, if they showed some competence, they would be ordained as lectors, then acolytes, then exorcists, and ultimately, if they were deemed worthy, they entered into major orders as subdeacons, deacons, and then priests.

The work of one of the minor clerics could always be done by someone in a higher order, since they had been already ordained to that lesser order. Gradually, especially in parish settings, the only one actually ordained was the parish priest. Especially after the invention of seminaries in the 16th centuries, those who were progressing through the minor orders were seldom to be found outside of seminaries and religious houses. Starting by way of exception, men, and eventually boys were permitted to assist the priest after the manner of ordained acolytes, even though they weren’t clerics and, strictly speaking, should not have been allowed to enter into the sanctuary. This exception became the norms in most places. Similarly, the choir, which once would have been composed entirely of clerical chanters, became primarily and often exclusively composed of laymen and even women.

At the time of the Second Vatican Council, some of the Fathers, imbued with the romantic vision of the liturgical movement, hoped to restore the ancient situation with manifold ministers, each performing his specific ministry within the holy Mass. Yet, rather than restore the ancient clerical nature of these ministries, the Council Fathers and their successors in the Vatican, used the contemporary practice of lay people serving in those roles once reserved to ordained acolytes and cantors as a model, and instituted the notion of laymen performing the role anciently reserved to the ordained lector. By the early 1970’s, Pope Paul VI entirely eliminated the vestiges of the ancient ladder of minor orders and the subdiaconate and, in their place, established two new ministries, acolyte and lector, with these ministries being open to laymen. An exception was given by Pope Paul, that these ministries could be fulfilled even by those not formally commissioned to them, and it did not take long in most places for that exception to become the norm.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
19 Comments

ASK FATHER: When should babies be baptized?

ASK FATHER: When should babies be baptized?From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

This subject comes up constantly in Catholic mom groups online. I would love your take on it.
Canon 867 §1. Parents are obliged to take care that infants are baptized in the first few weeks; as soon as possible after the birth or even before it, they are to go to the pastor to request the sacrament for their child and to be prepared properly for it. There are some who baptize their babies immediately after giving birth and some who wait 2-3 months. I’m in the second camp for several reasons….  Clearly, if there was an issue with the baby, a priest would be called in to do an immediate baptism or we would do an emergency baptism ourselves. Those in the other camp say that canon law must be followed to the T. Most parish/diocese policy also makes it difficult to do a baptism immediately after birth. My parish requires a birth certificate, which I didn’t receive until about 6 weeks after my son was born. Baptism prep classes can take up to a month to complete. Some parishes do not allow baptisms during Lent or only arrange one day for baptisms in each month. I’ve never even heard of someone baptizing their child before birth. Is this really done? So, what do you say to this? I feel that those of us on both sides of the\ issue are doing the right thing in seeking the sacrament for our children soon after birth. Is the difference between 2 and 12 weeks really a big deal? Are those of us who wait a month or two sinning?

GUEST PRIEST RESPONSE: Fr. Tim Ferguson

First, a clarification, baptism is not done before birth – the canon refers to going immediately after or even before birth to talk to the priest to arrange for the baptism.

The deeper question – how long should one wait before having one’s child baptized? In some cultures and in some places, baptism take place almost immediately after birth. Pope Benedict XVI was born early in the morning on Holy Saturday and was baptized in his parish church later that same day.

The canon speaks of “the first few weeks,” without giving further specificity. A month? Two months? Three months? Perhaps a good litmus test would be: how do you refer to the age of your newborn? “Billy’s seven weeks old.” “Amanda’s just over 10 weeks now.” “The twins are five months old.” “Ryan is 37 years old, and almost ready to stand on his own now. We’re so proud!”

If you’re still referring to your child’s age in weeks, I would argue, you’re still within the canonical range of “the first few weeks.”

Making reasonable preparations for family members to attend, and giving mother and child a chance to rest up before making the big public appearance does not seem to me to be incurring any sin, especially if the parents are knowledgeable and prepared to baptize their child in case of an emergency.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Canon Law, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
23 Comments

OLYMPICS 2018 12 Feb: CURLING!

I’ve been remiss in mentioning the most exciting sport of all the Winter Olympic events.

Put aside the humdrum sports of figure skating, downhill skiing, etc. No no. That’s not where the real excitement lies.

Here’s something that really deserves attention… biathlon! Ya’ gotta ski. Ya’ gotta shoot. Yep, people racing on skis with gravity mostly fighting you rather than helping you, and then, with heart pounding, hard breathing, maybe with strong wind and snow, you have to shoot with a .22 at a target the size of a DVD with a golf ball sized bulls eye 50m away!  If you miss, you have to do also a penalty loop.

Biathlon: Mercy, tempered by the Truth.

That’s cool.

OLYMPICS 2018 12 Feb: CURLING! OLYMPICS 2018 12 Feb: CURLING! OLYMPICS 2018 12 Feb: CURLING! OLYMPICS 2018 12 Feb: CURLING!

Then standing.  Very cool.

OLYMPICS 2018 12 Feb: CURLING!

There is a great video about the rifle.  HERE

Pretty soon we’ll also have Skeleton.   Memento mori!

Of course that pales in comparison with the raw excitement of…

CURLING!

We’ve all, I’m sure, been watching the weekly Curling Night in America for that weekly dose of pathos, thrills and adrenaline.  Now we are at the Olympics.

Lest you miss any of the ACTION a curling specific schedule is available HERE.

Curling isn’t all beer and skittles.   Well… it’s kinda like skittles and there’s probably a lot of beer involved outside the games, but… this Korean curler falls, reminding us all that….

Ice Is Slippery.

OLYMPICS 2018 12 Feb: CURLING!

This Cancukette has made a boo boo.  She throw the wrong rock, one of the Korean team’s.  No big, however.  They just swapped them out.

Curling: It’s merciful, but truthful.

OLYMPICS 2018 12 Feb: CURLING!

So, let the curling discussions begin.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

BOOKS RECEIVED: @DouthatNYT on state the Church under Francis (terrific) – John Rist in Reading Augustine series (a scream)

John Rist is one of the best working scholars on Augustine and writers on ethics in the world.   His books are fantastic, but they are hard.

Who is this guy?  HERE  He was also one of my profs in Rome.

Rist sets out to clarify who Augustine was and wasn’t, who he is and isn’t.  Then he critiques contemporary theology, etc., a kind of status quaestionis through Augustine’s own eyes.  I’ve been interested in what Augustine would think of contemporary issues ever since my first thesis, which was on Augustine and the figure of the “theologian” (suggested to me by Joseph Card. Ratzinger, btw).  If anyone can tackle this issue in a big way, definitive way?, it’s John Rist.

US HERE – UK HERE

BOOKS RECEIVED: @DouthatNYT on state the Church under Francis (terrific) - John Rist in Reading Augustine series (a scream)

[…]

In the first seven chapters of this book Augustine will say little about contemporary ‘theology’ and theologians, though he will show as he proceeds that he understands the need to tell a more substantial, less impressionistic theological story than most theologians now think necessary or even possible, for their judgements have been formed by a systemically developed ignorance of the history of theology. [Might I also add ignorance of history?  Recently a highly placed prelate gave a lecture in England and uttered all manner of absurdities based on premises that any 1st year student of the ancient world would have found laughable.  But I digress.] In these chapters he will indicate that his philosophical arguments, contextualized in much older and half-forgotten ‘philosophical’ and ‘theological’ beliefs, can call to account many of our own culture’s sacred cows. Then in Chapter 8 he will turn directly to contemporary theological trends and practices, to point to the minimum specifically intellectual work required if the discipline of ‘theology’ (as distinct from ‘philosophy’) is to be saved from the contempt in which (except in head-in-sand quarters) it is now almost universally held. His aim will be to replace secular idols (whether or not worshipped by quisling theologians) by something surprisingly like the thoughtful ‘theological’ Christianity he preached even to the uneducated in the early fifth-century North African city of Hippo.

[…]

In his own day Augustine argued with dissident Christians and with pagans. Nowadays few would call themselves ‘pagans’, though many would be happy to be called ‘secularists’. Our Augustine might see scant conceptual difference between the content of the two terms, for the secularists have their ‘gods’ (their idols) too, albeit they do not so designate them: their rights, their ‘charismatic’ politicians, their celebs and their ‘autonomy’. [NB] Throughout the following narrative Augustine will make little distinction between pagans and secularists when treating of recent centuries; indeed, he will view our age as in many respects a reversion to some of the least attractive and least defensible aspects of ancient paganism.

Things really pop in Chapter 8 – The Inevitable Irrelevance of Most Contemporary Theology.  One of my theologian friends told me that it’s “a scream”.  And that’s the right word.  I literally laughed aloud a couple of times.  A taste…

[T]he Catholic Church has thus gradually tended to evolve – other churches have already completed the mutation – into yet another NGO, albeit tarted up with a hypocritical or even nominal adherence to belief in a transcendent God….

And…

[A] prominent Roman Catholic Cardinal bases his account of truth not on the ancient notion that it is higher than the human mind but rather that it ‘arises’ from a ‘dialogue’ between the pantheistic Spirit of the Whole and man’s increasingly secular awareness.

Rist includes, pace Newman’s Apologia, “Austin’s Brag”.  He also has a “Transcript of a Radio Interview with Bishop Austin Redivivus: 1 April 2016.”

And his “Further Reading” list is a treasure.

The Kindle edition has a clickable index!  Verrrrry helpful.

Speaking of the 21st century, this next title should be interesting reading in juxtaposition to Rist’s book.

Ross Douthat’s newest… I just received an advance uncorrected review copy.

To Change the Church: Pope Francis and the Future of Catholicism

In his opening remarks at Jesuit-run F.U in NYC, Douthat recently made three points which might be used to evaluate the papacy of Pope Francis, five years on: 1) his impact on the public’s perception of the Church; 2) his attempts at reforming the Vatican bureaucracy; 3) his position on “moral-theological controversies,” specifically, communion for the divorced and remarried.  These are spun out in the course of the book’s conclusion.  But how he get’s there is riveting.  This is a status quaesitionis book which resolves in a provocative: “Quo?” 

PRE-ORDER now at a discount for its March release.

His preface is deeply personal. He lays out his background and positions and clearly states that he doesn’t intend to be neutral.  The first sentence:

This is a book about the most important religious story of our time: the fate of the world’s largest religious institution under a pope who believes that Roman Catholicism can change in ways that his predecessors rejected, and who faces resistance from Catholics who believe the changes he seeks risk breaking faith with Jesus Christ.

US HERE – UK HERE

BOOKS RECEIVED: @DouthatNYT on state the Church under Francis (terrific) - John Rist in Reading Augustine series (a scream)

His chapter on Benedict’s resignation (as I write, it is the 5th anniversary of his announcement), is a pretty good summary of the issues of his papacy.  His chapter on the election of Francis starts out with the Sankt Gallen project.  His final chapter, pre-maturely perhaps entitled “The Francis Legacy” has this sobering paragraph.  He talks about sweeping aside cardinals and others who stand in his way and goes on:

This is, sometimes, what Francis himself has seemed to be aiming at with his footnotes and fraught silences-off legacy of theological liberalism in effective power, but with enough room left for theological conservatives parenthesis including all those “rigid” priests he dislikes but whom the church obviously needs) to feel like their understanding of Roman Catholicism still has life. But as we have seen just in the two years since Amoris was published, this kind of truce is difficult to sustain. The old truce worked, sort of, because both sides thought of themselves as playing a long game: Conservatives had a (complacent) confidence that papal authority would gradually overcome dissent, and liberals accepted that they would not enjoy power for the foreseeable future, which meant that it almost didn’t matter what happened in Rome day-to-day, because when the necessary changes came, all of the mistakes of the John Paul era would be swept away together.

Under the new truce, though, the day to day stakes for conservatives are much higher-with more popes like Francis, Catholic truth will stand on a knife’s edge, and the promise for liberals much more immediate and tempting and hard to resist pursuing further.

[…]

There are so many bits I would like to quote from his concluding chapter, as he describes the present state of things in this papacy.

I think that he has nailed it.

Back to Rist for a moment.

To anyone who studies Augustine, Rist’s book is necessary.  Just buy it.

US HERE – UK  HERE

BOOKS RECEIVED: @DouthatNYT on state the Church under Francis (terrific) - John Rist in Reading Augustine series (a scream)

 

And this is a hard book, but rewarding.

US HERE  – UK – HERE

BOOKS RECEIVED: @DouthatNYT on state the Church under Francis (terrific) - John Rist in Reading Augustine series (a scream)

 

Posted in Francis, REVIEWS, The Campus Telephone Pole, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
4 Comments

Benedict XVI’s resignation 5 years on. Your thoughts.

Five years ago today, Pope Benedict XVI announced that he would abdicate, effective 28 February.  My posts on that day.   HERE

Lightening struck the dome of St. Peter’s Basilica.

The Feast then, as today, of Our Lady of Lourdes.

I remember where I was when I heard the news.  I’ll be you do too.

Five years down the road, what are your thoughts about this monumental event?

Please.  Switch on a filter or two and think before posting.  The moderation queue is ON for this and for all posts.

The Holy Father: ipsissimis verbis…

Play video

Benedict XVI's resignation 5 years on. Your thoughts.

Click HERE.

Benedict XVI's resignation 5 years on. Your thoughts.

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged
60 Comments

Carmelite Nuns seeking Priest Chaplain

Carmelite Nuns seeking Priest ChaplainThe last time I played yenta for a group of sisters looking for a chaplain, the results were pretty good!  HERE

Today I received a note from Mother Mary Bethany OCD, of the Discalced Carmelite Nuns in Georgetown, California (D. Sacramento).

They need a new chaplain by MARCH.

I asked for some details and Mother wrote back:

We are requesting a (reverent) Novus Ordo Mass, which most of our Sisters are used to.  Our Divine Office is in English also.

Our chaplain would have the use of a furnished house on our property, a car, a stipend commensurate with his needs and/or our abilities.  We would hope for Confessions every two weeks, and a Benediction /Adoration service on Sunday afternoons.

We are located in the Sierra Nevada foothills in a quiet rural place, so our chaplain should be able to endure silence & solitude, with some limited apostolate to the little town of Georgetown if he is able.  Not necessary.

There are 14 of us, 2 novices in formation and 12 black veils, ranging in age from 20 – 85.

We’re dedicated to St Therese , we love the Holy Face devotions, we love St Teresa of Avila!

Our bishop is Jaime Soto (Sacramento) and he is aware of our search.

Our phone is 530-333-1617.

Fr. Yenta now steps aside.

I won’t do this very often.  However, when I saw their page about the restoration of a statue of Our Lady of the Clergy, I admit that my cold, black heart warmed slightly for maybe.. two beats.  I’ve been looking for a statue of her for a while.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole, Women Religious | Tagged
Comments Off on Carmelite Nuns seeking Priest Chaplain

JUST TOO COOL! Wherein Fr. Z is AMAZED at … coincidences? I think not.

JUST TOO COOL! Wherein Fr. Z is AMAZED at ... coincidences? I think not.Okay… someone tell me what’s going on here!  (Trick question.  I think I know.)

As you recall, I have a great portable altar from St. Joseph’s Apprentice, and Pelican case to ship it in.  HERE

I also now have great reversible travel vestments for that altar, including little frontals.

JUST TOO COOL! Wherein Fr. Z is AMAZED at ... coincidences? I think not.

I’m am also getting ready for an interesting pilgrimage to S. Italy and Sicily in April and May.

So… I’m thinking about this situation, of the portable altar, the case, the shipping.  What to do?

JUST TOO COOL! Wherein Fr. Z is AMAZED at ... coincidences? I think not.

US HERE – UK HERE

Meanwhile, I get out a DVD of… “Hey, I haven’t seen this for a while!”… For Greater Glory.  It’s about the Cristeros.

After weighing my options, I call St. Joseph’s Apprentice, and told him to start making a “Wilderness Altar” for me.  After all, I won’t need the internal storage space inside my other beautiful altar, because I have the case with the formable foam.  That’ll lighten the load and I’ll have more storage space.

I had seen photos of the Wilderness Altar on his site.  HERE

JUST TOO COOL! Wherein Fr. Z is AMAZED at ... coincidences? I think not.

During our phone conversation, St. Joseph’s Apprentice told me how meaningful it had been to make that altar (above), which contains a relic of the Mexican boy martyr… Saint José Luis Sánchez del Río.

For Greater Glory… portable altar… St. José Luis Sánchez del Río ….

Then – out of the blue? – I get an email from a priest entitled “Viva Cristo Rey!”   With an attached photo of… St. José Luis Sánchez del Río!

Father says that TODAY is the Feast of St. José, who was murdered exactly 90 years ago today: 10 February 1928.

I called up St. Joseph’s Apprentice to tell him that, and he tells me that the first altar he ever made had a link to the… Cristeros.

He explained that he had built a shrine for his brother in law and the local priest came to bless it.  Afterward, the priest said he wanted an altar built for an altar stone he had been given by another priest.  It was from the Cristeros.  That was Altar #1!

So, folks, you tell me what’s going on with this.

I suspect that this project and the upcoming pilgrimage may have the smile of “Joselito”, which is a diminutive of “José… Joseph”, which might be used to describe a certain builder of beautiful portable altars, who was Cristeros inspired.

Play video

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, Just Too Cool, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged , , ,
5 Comments

Concerning lying by omission, the perils of words, and the advantages of silence

At First Things there is a piece by Ramona V. Tausz, who rightly admires the discretion of Queen Elizabeth II regarding the media and too much public exposure.  She writes:

[T]here is something refreshing about Elizabeth herself. Nowadays, we expect our politicians, presidents, and even popes to be stars—celebrities who express their individuality in tweet-storms and air their every whim on Facebook. Elizabeth’s remarkable discretion (The Coronation marks the first time she has agreed to an on-camera interview) may strike us as both odd and downright boring. Yet her infamously “stringent control” over media access to the monarchy is integral to her success. For sixty-six years she has faced the challenge of balancing her individuality as Elizabeth Windsor with her public persona as Elizabeth Regina, and in all her time on the throne she has rarely permitted her personality to overshadow her office. It is this regal emphasis on office—on “the monarchy, not the monarch,” as Claire Foy’s Elizabeth puts it in The Crown—that Americans could stand to learn from.

Not only Americans.

I would also hazard to say, many churchmen around the world of every possible level.

Two principles.

1- Less is more.  Keep in mind that familiarity breeds contempt.
2 – By and large the media is not to be trusted.

The latter was evident to me and my recent unfortunate experience with a BuzzFeed reporter.  He was going to write an article about me anyway – I am convinced at the behest of people who pretty much hate my guts and want me silenced – and it probably would have been worse had I not consented to a meeting and interview before the final product was excreted for public view.

That experience was a good lesson, because it was an example of how reporters lie by understatement.  I wrote about understatement – HERE – also in regard to the Jesuit homosexualist activist James Martin, who deceives – like Geryon with the face of an honest man – by leaving out something really important that ought not to be left out.  Leaving out something of critical importance is a form of lying.   In the case of the BuzzFeed piece, the reporter began his deception from the top, by quoting something controversial that I wrote, but – with ellipsis … left something critical out.  He deceived.

There is a great moment in the Old Testament that shows how deceptive “understatement” can be.   Take the machinations in the Book of Esther about Haman – loathed by Jews, and rightly so.

Concerning lying by omission, the perils of words, and the advantages of silenceHaman was the adviser of the Persian King Ahasuerus.  This is the time of the Babylonian Captivity for the Jews.   Haman plots to have all the Jews killed.  He needs Ahasuerus to sign on.  How to convince him?  Haman lies to him by telling him the truth… partly.   First, Haman tells the king that that Jews are spread through his whole kingdom, which was true.  That makes the Jews seem to be a factor for the whole kingdom, were they to become a problem.  Next, Haman tells the king that the Jews obey different laws than the rest of the people, which was true but only partially true.  They obeyed the Jewish dietary laws, etc., but Haman left out that they also obeyed the king’s laws.  The omission of that last bit, the Jews’ obedience to the king’s laws, made the Jews seem a) widespread and b) disobedient, therefore dangerous.  Finally, Haman concludes with an plain lie: Jews must not be tolerated.  Ahasuerus issues the edict to kill all the Jews.  He deceives by the juxtaposition of truth, half truth and outright falsehood.

What Haman did was so appalling that, on the feast of Purim (celebrating the deliverance of the Jews) and their reading of the Book of Esther, when Haman’s name comes up in the text they substitute a noisemaker called a “grogger”, much like the twirly gizmos we use during the Triduum instead of bells.

That’s how most of the media, especially secular media, works.  Alas, that’s how some churchmen these days work as well.  I recently read something spectacularly wrong about the primacy of conscience that was perfectly deceptive, though it was couched in otherwise true terms.  Important – really important stuff was left out.

Haman – Patron of BuzzFeed, etc.

The Book of Esther is a terrific story, btw, and part of our family history.  I digress.

When we choose to speak, we should weigh words carefully and think.  The Italian proverb I learned in my first week or so of Italian seminary is: Prima pensa, poi parla, perché parole poco pensate portano pena … First, think, then speak, because words which have been weighed little bring penalties.  If we speak on something important, we must be careful to include all the bits that really matter to the topic.  The “whole” truth, as it were.

The flip side of speaking with precision, is not to speak at all. Not rarely in both the pulpit and the confessional I comment that we could avoid a lot of sins (trouble) if we were just to keep our mouths shut.   The more we talk, in general, the greater the chance is that we can get ourselves into trouble.  Unintentional trouble is still trouble.

But, “who am I to judge”?

So, churchmen out there… be careful.  Learn from the discretion of Queen Elizabeth when it comes to the press.  Less can be more.

And when WE are elected to the See of Peter, We shall – firstly, suppress the Jesuits, and then we will disappear into the Apostolic Palace for stretches of time so long that some will wonder if we have died.

At this point I will shut up and direct you all to Card. Sarah’s wonderful book.

Benedict XVI wrote a brief essay as an afterword for a future re-printing of Robert Card. Sarah’s great book The Power of Silence: Against the Dictatorship of Noise.

US HERE – UK HERE

Concerning lying by omission, the perils of words, and the advantages of silence

Posted in Biased Media Coverage | Tagged , , , , , , , ,
4 Comments