The Philippines: vast super typhoon, devastation, death

A massive storm has devastated the Philippines. Thousands are dead.  Some 10,000 are dead.  Who knows how many are injured and displaced.

I will say Mass for the dead from the storm tomorrow, Monday.  I am sure you will join your prayers to mine.

Some of your fellow readers of this blog, and contributors in the combox, are from the Philippines.

The US military’s Pacific command has been mobilized to help. It is hard to say how many military personnel will eventually be dispatched to the area, but I am pretty use chaplains will be with them.  But, remember, the Fishwrap and other liberals are attacking the collection to help the Archdiocese for Military Services.  I don’t want anyone to forget the National Catholic Reporter‘s sustained attack on military chaplains during this time when US forces are heading to aid those poor, suffering people.

Click to donate!

I imagine that there are reliable Catholic services which will be organizing aid. Also, I will be watching to see if one of my favorite groups, Team Rubicon, heads across the Pacific.

UPDATE:

Team Rubicon has launched Operation Seabird.  HERE

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Global Killer Asteroid Questions | Tagged , , ,
17 Comments

Of liturgical silence and gigantic centipedes

Here is a great point for our reflection on our obligation to revitalize our liturgical worship of God.

Unless we revitalize our liturgical worship, no other aspect of a New Evangelization will have any lasting effect.

Dan Burke wrote at the National Catholic Register:

The Devil’s War On Silence in Mass

A consistent thread in the resulting dialogue from my post “The Devil’s War On Silence” was on the common problem of the disturbing absence of silence in Mass. This is clearly a challenge that is very familiar to the majority of faithful Catholics.
Frequently, the noise assaults us right when we enter the church — from the choir, the parishioners and other sources. This despite the fact that the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (GIRM) clearly outlines the critical importance and specific instructions for the place of sacred silence in the Mass:
“Sacred silence also, as part of the celebration, is to be observed at the designated times,” the GIRM says. “Its purpose, however, depends on the time it occurs in each part of the celebration. Thus within the Act of Penitence and again after the invitation to pray, all recollect themselves; but at the conclusion of a reading or the homily, all meditate briefly on what they have heard; then after Communion, they praise and pray to God in their hearts.

Even before the celebration itself, it is commendable that silence be observed in the church, in the sacristy, in the vesting room, and in adjacent areas, so that all may dispose themselves to carry out the sacred action in a devout and fitting manner.” (#45)

Why Silence?

The most important portion of this instruction is contained clearly and elegantly in the last line, and it’s worthy of repetition: We need silence “so that all may dispose themselves to carry out the sacred action in a devout and fitting manner.” Here we have the wisdom of the Church, as the Holy Spirit leads us to eschew all human priorities outside of God and to draw our hearts to the reality of this sacred encounter. The Mass finds its ultimate purpose in the condescension of God to meet with us and nourish us — and for us to respond in a manner worthy of this gift of all gifts.

It stands to reason that our behavior at Mass will be proportionally devout to the degree we believe this meeting of heaven an earth is actually happening. In contrast, those that see the Mass as a kind of religious social gathering — and harbor disbelief or lack proper instruction — will see no need for such formality, and will act accordingly.

What Is the Answer?

Those who do know the proper reality should lead by example and teach it in a way that is focused first on the reality of God present, and then on how we should respond. This cannot be done in a spirit of condescending traditionalism that worships tradition (as did the Pharisees). Instead, it must be done in a spirit of love that recognizes the power of liturgical tradition to aid and order the heart of the believer toward offering just praise to our most merciful and deserving God.
Those who are not called or able to teach (Note: almost no one in the Church falls into this category) should emulate the behavior they desire, but without the negativity often flowing freely from those who worship at the altar of traditionalism. Yes, we must live out our love for God in our reverent worship and love those who have yet to know the benefit of sound formation or maturity. For those who turn others away from God by their bad attitudes will be judged by a higher standard than those who know far less or who have yet to effectively live out what they know. Need convincing? Take a look at Matthew 18:21-25 for a glimpse at Jesus’ perspective on the wrong approach to this kind of situation.

So What Does the Devil Have to Do With All of This?

[…]

You can read the rest there.

In his Spirit in the Liturgy, Joseph Card. Ratzinger wrote of liturgical silence:

We are realizing more and more clearly that silence is part of the liturgy. We respond, by singing and praying, to the God who addresses us, but the greater mystery, surpassing all words, summons us to silence. It must, of course, be a silence with content, not just the absence of speech and action. We should expect the liturgy to give us a positive stillness that will restore us. Such stillness will not be just a pause, in which a thousand thoughts and desires assault us, but a time of recollection, giving us an inward peace, allowing us to draw breath and rediscover the one thing necessary, which we have forgotten. That is why silence cannot be simply “made”, organized as if it were one activity among many. It is no accident that on all sides people are seeking techniques of meditation, a spirituality for emptying the mind. One of man’s deepest needs is making its presence felt, a need that is manifestly not being met in our present form of the liturgy. For silence to be fruitful, as we have already said, it must not be just a pause in the action of the liturgy. No, it must be an integral part of the liturgical event.

There is an old adage in theatre: Everything is nothing.   If the whole set is red, you stop looking at it.  If the volume is nothing but loud, you stop listening.  If there is constant noise, sound, something to hear and process, you tune out.

However, there is a greater purpose to silence in liturgical worship.  There is apophatic dimension of worship which must be fostered.  We need to be able to experience mystery between the signs, just as Moses had a glimpse of God through the crack in the rock.

Meanwhile, remember what Screwtape said about silence and noise:

Music and silence – how I detest them both! How thankful we should be that ever since our Father entered Hell – though longer ago than humans, reckoning in light years, could express – no square inch of infernal space and no moment of infernal time has been surrendered to either of those abominable forces, but all has been occupied by Noise – Noise, the grand dynamism, the audible expression of all that is exultant, ruthless, and virile – Noise which alone defends us from silly qualms, despairing scruples, and impossible desires. We will make the whole universe a noise in the end. We have already made great strides in this direction as regards the Earth. The melodies and silences of Heaven will be shouted down in the end. But I admit we are not yet loud enough, or anything like it. Research is in progress. Meanwhile you, disgusting little –

[Here the MS. breaks off and is resumed in a different hand.]

This is what Screwtape in his rage accidentally transforms himself into a giant centipede.  Nasty.

If the Mass you attend regularly has little or no silence…  you need to make a change.  A Mass that has no silence in it, that is constantly at you to pay attention to something in an invasive way, to force you into the wrong sort of “active participation”, is sort of like a giant demonic centipede crawling its way into your head.

BTW… did you know that John Cleese did an audiobook reading of The Screwtape Letters?  Marvelous.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, The Drill | Tagged , , , , , ,
51 Comments

Happy 238th Birthday USMC!

Click to donate!

Happy Birthday US Marine Corps!

Thank you and OORAH!

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged
13 Comments

Let’s play Global Thermonuclear War!

Fishwrap (aka National Schismatic Reporter) has yet another attack piece against the important collection to be taken up this weekend for the Archdiocese for Military Services.

In other words they are attacking Catholic chaplains.

In the latest divisive hate piece Fishwrap has this suggestion:

Outside the clergy, a small, lay-led online effort seeks to offer Catholics opposed to the collection an alternative when the basket makes its way through the pews.

Catholics Against Militarism has made available on its website downloadable cards for Catholics opposed to the collection “to put in the collection basket instead of money, just to make their voices heard,” member Ellen Finnigan said.

The cards, in part, read: “A nationwide collection for AMS sends a message to American Catholics that the Catholic Church condones America’s current military activity and post-9-11 wars. … Church is no place to glorify the ideals of the professional military class, which run contrary to most, if not all, Christian beliefs and teachings, including the Christian Just War theory. Today, in a spirit of peace, I offer my dissent.”

Fishwrap upbraids those who create “divisiveness” or who use sharp rhetoric.

And yet here is Fishwrap attacking an established, recognized ministry to well over 1 million lay people, some of whom are children, some of whom are suffering in horrible life-threatening circumstances.  Some of them are poor, they work for almost nothing.

How ’bout this.  There is special collection for nuns every year.

CLICK TO DONATE

Do they deserve a handout after all the strife and division some of them create in the Church?

How about I create a card you can download and print to offer your disgust about the LCWR when it is time to take up a collection for women religious?

“A nationwide collection for women religious sends a message to American Catholics that the Catholic Church condones America’s women religious dissenting from Church teachings and causing scandal and confusion among the faithful. … Church is no place to glorify the ideals of the dissenting nuns, such as those of the LCWR and CHA, which run contrary to most, if not all, Christian beliefs and teachings, including just about everything in the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Today, in a spirit of peace, I offer my dissent.”

Hey!  I recognize a good idea when I see it.   Liberals are the experts at division.  This is a Leftist idea and tactic.

I don’t see the USCCB rushing to denounce the tactic.  The Left gets away with this garbage all the time.  Not this time. Let’s start a card campaign, too!

Look. For those of you in Columbia Heights, I am making a point about how the Left works. I don’t really want to start a campaign against the sisters. But the LEFT thinks this is a great idea: attack Catholic chaplains and then create division in parish churches by smearing the Military Archdiocese as warmongers. I am kidding.  They are serious.

If this isn’t divisive, what is?

If we wanted to, we could play the game, too.

Remember that movie WarGames?

Joshua: Shall we play a game?

David Lightman: [typing] Love to. How about Global Thermonuclear War?
Joshua: Wouldn’t you prefer a nice game of chess?
[Jennifer laughs]
David Lightman: [typing] Later. Let’s play Global Thermonuclear War.
Joshua: Fine.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Whom shall we nuke next? How ’bout KANSAS CITY!

And Greg Reynolds is still excommunicated.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liberals | Tagged , , ,
60 Comments

We also had the “Church Indifferent”.

Former-Father Greg Reynolds is still excommunicated.

The most wonderfullest and fluffiest Pope ehvur did this.

Always keep that in mind when you read liberal cant about how he is shaking things up.

There is an article about former-Father Reynolds who, like all dissenters, seems not to be able to shut up about himself.

This is an interesting tidbit about him…

After completing an economics degree at Monash University, Reynolds started questioning whether there was more to life. A friend of his mother’s suggested he enter the seminary, where others were surely grappling with such questions.

“I went into the seminary not even sure that God existed,” he says. “I didn’t put a time frame on it, but it was certainly just going to be a temporary arrangement, ’til I got a few answers and then I’d get out.”

He enjoyed it and began to think that he could be a priest. “But it’s a bit awkward if you don’t believe in God,” he says laughing. “So I gave God, if She’s [sic] out there, a bit of time, saying, ‘You’re going to have to sort this out because I can’t go on here indefinitely.’?”

You will by now be asking: “How the hell did this guy even get into the seminary in the first place?”

This sort of thing, the Greg Reynolds types, don’t just “happen”.

We have the Church Suffering, the Church Militant, and the Church Triumphant.

We also had the Church Indifferent.

Posted in Liberals, The Drill | Tagged
37 Comments

“Latinitas” rediviva

This is from News.va:

Presentation of the new journal “LATINITAS”

Vatican City, 8 November 2013 (VIS) – This morning a press conference was held in the Holy See Press Office to present the first issue of the new series of the journal “Latinitas”, published by the Pontifical Academy Latinitas, instituted by Pope Benedict XVI in November 2012. The speakers were Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, president of the Pontifical Council for Culture; Professor Ivano Dionigi, president of the Pontifical Academy for Latin and rector of the University of Bologna, and the writer Valerio Massimo Manfredi.

The first issue will include an article responding to the questions, “Latin for whom? Why Latin?” by the new director Ivano Dionigi, following an epigraph dedicated to Pope Francis.

The journal is divided into three sections: scientific (“Historica et philologica”); “Humaniora”, dedicated to contemporary literature in Latin, and “Ars docendi”, which considers didactic issues related to classical languages and cultures, ranging from antiquity to the present day.

The volume is completed by an appendix in Latin with “Breves de Academiae vita notitiae”, a brief summary of the main activities of the academy, the “Argumenta” or abstracts of the contributions to the journal in accordance with current international norms for scientific publications, and a useful “Index universus”. The new “Latinitas” will publish articles in Latin and, for the first time, in Italian and other languages.

Posted in Brick by Brick | Tagged ,
13 Comments

What Francis says… what liberals hear…

Pope Francis says something like: “We need a deeper theology of women.”

What liberals hear: “The Pope is going to name women cardinals!”

That Francis might create females cardinals is patently absurd.

The cartoon, by the way, is from this week’s number of The Catholic Herald, the UK’s best Catholic weekly.  You can get the entire paper in digital format (avoid that pesky late postal delivery) and look at the entire archive by getting a subscription.  It is good for us in these USA to keep an eye across the pond.  They are farther along in the culture wars than we and their experiences should be object lessons to us.

And former-Father Greg Reynolds is still excommunicated.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged , ,
43 Comments

New NYC Mayor pledges to expand abortion, wipe out crisis pregnancy centers

From Breitbart:

NYC MAYOR-ELECT DE BLASIO PROMISES TO WIPE OUT CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTERS

The city in which 41 percent of pregnancies end in abortion has elected a new mayor who is pledging to partner with Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers to expand their businesses even further by providing them with “city-sponsored” space to set up shop.
Bill de Blasio, who was elected Tuesday with 73 percent of the vote, [!] also pledged to help abortionists wipe out their main competition – pro-life crisis pregnancy centers – which he refers to as “sham” clinics. These centers offer women financial and logistical assistance to either keep their babies or place them with adoptive families.
LifeSiteNews reported that de Blasio expressed his view that since crisis pregnancy centers refuse to perform abortions, they do not offer “legitimate health care.” He has promised to continue the city’s appeal of a court order striking down a law aimed at closing down these centers.
Should the court appeal fail, however, de Blasio states he will “craft new regulations to prevent [crisis pregnancy] centers from masquerading as legitimate health care providers.”
De Blasio said that, in order to ensure a sufficient number of abortionists to meet the high demand, he will also continue to force doctors who train in city hospitals to perform abortions as a routine part of their training. The mandate is a NARAL-backed program that began under Mayor Michael Bloomberg and which de Blasio referred to as “groundbreaking.”
To make sure women can pay to have abortions, de Blasio has pledged to use ObamaCare to expand state-funded abortion coverage to more New York City women. [Get that?  No matter where you live, this wicked man will try to force you to pay for this evil program.  I hope you catholic Dems are happy.]
A self-described “democratic socialist,” [Or just Democrat?] de Blasio traveled to the Soviet Union as a student and honeymooned with his wife, in violation of the travel ban, in Cuba.
The mayor-elect spent many of his early adult years traveling to Nicaragua, where he supplied the Communist Sandinistas – whom he called “really inspirational” – and their allies with funds and food while working with the Quixote Center, a Maryland-based leftist Catholic group that once referred to American opposition to Communist leadership in Nicaragua as “spreading terrorism.”

What do you think about this?

I am waiting for Fishwrap to endorse de Blasio.

Posted in Liberals, Pò sì jiù, Religious Liberty, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , ,
60 Comments

“Missale Romanum cum lectionibus” now available online

A watershed.

The busy bees at Corpus Christi Watershed – apart from providing the great music resources for the older, traditional form of the Roman Rite – has now provided for your free download the whole of the 4 volume Missale Romanum cum lectionibus.

I have these precious volumes, useful especially because they allow the priest to say the Novus Ordo from one book alone (something Annibale wanted to prevent).  It was great for travel… back when I said the Novus Ordo alot, that is.

Click HERE

Be aware, however, that on every single page of the PDF, Corpus Christi Watershed placed an announcement that is time limited.  This is super annoying.  It will be even more annoying after “early 2014”.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
17 Comments

A 1st TLM experience: “I had the sense that that Host was REALLY consecrated.”

Some will find this provocative.  I find it to be true.

I had to make a call to a local parish office today, and while chatting with the secretary, found out that she attended her first Extraordinary Form Mass on Christ the King Sunday. [Last Sunday of October.] I asked her what she thought, and her response was:

“I had the sense that that Host was REALLY consecrated.”

She went on to explain that she understands that the two masses are the same, [Both are valid.] but that she definitely felt there was something more solemn going on in the Sung Latin Mass.

Her comment made my day, and I thought it might make yours as well!

This comment opens up many issues.

First, she isn’t saying that a Host is more consecrated because it is the Extraordinary Form.  To be clear: When I consecrate a Host in the Ordinary Form it is not more or less consecrated than it is when I use the Extraordinary Form.  Nor is it more or less consecrated were I to consecrate using the Maronite Rite or the Ambrosian Rite or the Byzantine Rite or the Braga Rite.  Nor is it more or less consecrated than when I am eventually named a monsignor or, for my sins, a bishop, cardinal or pope.

However, considering Mass merely from the point of view of the bare minimum of validity is dangerous.

We mustn’t fall into that trap.

Mass is more than the sine qua non, all important, valid consecration.  Mass is a whole.

Yes, something more is going on during a Missa Cantata in the traditional form, and even more in the Missa Solemnis and even more in the Missa Pontificalis.  It is important that the older, traditional form be revived, relearned, reclaimed far and wide.  We need its influence.  We need it to rehabilitate liturgical worship in the Latin Church everywhere.  No initiative of “New Evangelization” or of renewal of the Church will have any concrete effect unless we renew our liturgical worship.

THEREFORE, I am deeply grateful and encouraged when I hear from seminarians that they and most of their seminarian colleagues are open to and/or eager to learn and then to use the Extraordinary Form.

Benedict XVI gave us a vision and a mission.  The vision and the mission remain.  They have not been superseded.  They have not been cancelled, annulled, repudiated. As I have said before, it is time to take the training wheels off and ride the damn bike!  If you want the TLM, work for it.  If it is hard, keep working.  This is NOT the time to ease up.  This is exactly the time to keep pressing onward, petitioning for more and more and more, not just for little crumbs off the liberal cool-kids’ table.  Young priests will be with you.  Support them 250%.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , , , ,
70 Comments