"The great Father Zed, Archiblogopoios"
-
Fr. John Hunwicke
"Some 2 bit novus ordo cleric"
- Anonymous
"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."
- Kractivism
"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"
"Zuhlsdorf is an eccentric with no real consequences" -
HERE
- Michael Sean Winters
"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."
- Anna Arco
“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”
- Comment
"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."
- Sam Rocha
"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."
- Comment
"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."
- Anonymous
Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD
- Comment
Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.
- America Magazine
RC integralist who prays like an evangelical fundamentalist.
-Austen Ivereigh on
Twitter
[T]he even more mainline Catholic Fr. Z. blog.
-
Deus Ex Machina
“For me the saddest thing about Father Z’s blog is how cruel it is.... It’s astonishing to me that a priest could traffic in such cruelty and hatred.”
- Jesuit homosexualist James Martin to BuzzFeed
"Fr. Z's is one of the more cheerful blogs out there and he is careful about keeping the crazies out of his commboxes"
- Paul in comment at
1 Peter 5
"I am a Roman Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
I am a TLM-going Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
And I am in a state of grace today, in no small part, because of your blog."
- Tom in
comment
"Thank you for the delightful and edifying omnibus that is your blog."-
Reader comment.
"Fr. Z disgraces his priesthood as a grifter, a liar, and a bully. -
- Mark Shea
Not 100% sure (I will be after going on the retreat in May in Nebraska), but I think it’s the 1962 latin-only version from Novus et Vetera. I’ve never heard of another edition being used. Not sure if the reader wants to know the year (1962) or the publisher (Novus et Vetera), but as far as I know, that’s the one. The FSSP uses only the 1962 books and I don’t know of any other publishers that make the full ’62 Breviary.
Baronius Press will soon (2009-2010 according to their previous promises) will release the bi-lingual Latin-English edition originally published by Liturgical Press, Collegeville.
http://www.fraternitypublications.com/brroin.html
More specifically: http://www.fraternitypublications.com/brrotrobrso.html
The Breviarium Romanum (1962)
That’s from the Fraternity Publishing, that’s the main source for the Breviary currently… though, soon Baronious Press is to release it at their site I believe.
Yes, the Nova et Vetera BrevRom was actually published in cooperation with the FSSP. The individual priests, however, most likely use just whichever book they have.
The Fraternity Publications Service appears to be selling the Nova et Vetera edition.
For the SSPX, see http://www.angeluspress.org/
Regarding the Nova et Vetera Breviary they indicate here
http://www.breviariumromanum.com/links.html
That the FSSP Bookstore is the authorized distributor in the US
It would be great to have the volumes for side by side comparison.
I have a few sets of different editions. One I have been using is a reprint of the 1961 BrevRom by Dessain done by the FSSP. But I think there is a different version now.
There is a brand new edition out by FSSP and information is on their website http://www.fssp.com. Click on the bookstore. It is 2 volumes with text of the Psalms from the Vulgate. Text set in traditional 2 columns, all Latin. Complete new arrangement of text in classical order. Rubrics promulgated by Pope John XXIII. Approved according to Canon Law (C826). It’s $298 for the 2 volumes.
Wait, and buy the new Baronius edition coming out any minute. It will be a good product.
You can get it free online here. Make sure to click “1960 Rubrics.”
http://divinumofficium.com/cgi-bin/horas/officium.pl
It has the English as well, which you can use as a crutch.
If you have an iPad, with this site, you have a “FSSP” Roman Breviary, though sometimes it doesn’t have all the English for the Matins Readings – you just have to tough it out in Latin.
ad Jesum per Mariam,
Taylor R. Marshall
Taylor – thank you for the website & iPad recommendation! The FSSP Breviary [which is gorgeous] is printed in Latin only, and I definitely need the English to get started (& probably will for a while!)
Just to be clear: is it by selecting “Divino Afflatu” that we access the version used by FSSP?
I assume the “Divino Afflatu” version refers to Pius X’s encyclical, so it is probably not the one preferred by FSSP, but presumably used by SSPX? As Taylor said, use the “1960 rubrics” version.
Emilio III: the SSPX also use the 1960 Office. Divino Afflatu refers to older rubrics (as you say), and the creator of the site happens to use this form the of breviary.
Thanks !
I’ve seen a fair number of different breviaries in use by SSPX priests. I’ve got the Mame edition – supposedly an illegal reprint from the bad old days when these things were really hard to come by otherwise.