Pres. Obama’s disrespect for the military

I was really angry when I first saw this.

Mr. President.  These guys are NOT your valets!  They are NOT hotel doormen!

From the Daily Caller:

Obama breaches Marine umbrella protocol

The commander in chief of the American armed forces today forced a violation of Marine Corps regulations, so he wouldn’t get wet.

According to Marine Corps regulation MCO P1020.34F of the Marine Corps Uniform Regulations chapter 3, a male Marine is not allowed to carry an umbrella while in uniform. There is no provision in the Marine Corps uniform regulation guidelines that allows a male Marine to carry an umbrella.

Nevertheless, during a press conference under a light drizzle with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan this morning, President Obama allowed the First Head to be protected from the elements by an umbrella held by a male Marine corporal.

The relevant portion of the regulation reads, “3035. UMBRELLAS (Female Marines). Female Marines may carry an all-black, plain standard or collapsible umbrella at their option during inclement weather with the service and dress uniforms. It will be carried in the left hand so that the hand salute can be properly rendered. Umbrellas may not be used/carried in formation nor will they be carried with the utility uniform.”

Items not expressly delineated as authorized components of the Marine Corps uniform are prohibited. Male Marines are informed never to carry an umbrella from the earliest phases of training.

Not even the President of the United States can request a Marine to carry an umbrella without the express consent of the Commandant of the Marine Corps, according to the Marine Corps Manual.

The Marine Corps Manual, the guidebook that defines protocol for officers and enlisted Marines, in section 2806 paragraph 2, specifically states: “The Marine Corps Uniform Regulations, published by the Commandant of the Marine Corps, shall be binding on all Marines. No officer or official shall issue instructions which conflict with, alter, or amend any provision without the approval of the Commandant of the Marine Corps.

UPDATE:

I saw this.  Amusing.

Posted in Liberals, Pò sì jiù | Tagged , , , ,
76 Comments

Need a review of what’s up with the LCWR?

If some of you are wondering what is going on with the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, there is a good summary piece at the National Catholic Register.  That’s the Register, not the National Schismatic Reporter (aka Fishwrap… which is in the tank for the LCWR).

In case you have been scratching your head, this is a decent summary of what has been going on.

HERE

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Magisterium of Nuns, The Drill, Women Religious | Tagged ,
5 Comments

Beauty break

Wow…

From Astronomy Pic of the Day: Explanation: Above this boreal landscape, the arc of the Milky Way and shimmering aurorae flow through the night. Like an echo, below them lies Iceland’s spectacular Godafoss, the Waterfall of the Gods. Shining just below the Milky Way, bright Jupiter is included in the panoramic nightscape recorded on March 9. Faint and diffuse, the Andromeda Galaxy (M31) appears immersed in the auroral glow.

For a big version go HERE.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged ,
12 Comments

Francis and friend

A reader sent me this:

Posted in Francis, Lighter fare | Tagged ,
26 Comments

QUAERITUR: Getting married on a Friday. Must I abstain from meat? Fr. Z includes a brief rant.

From a reader:

im getting married on friday may 31st the day after Corpus Christi.

can i eat meat at the reception or do i need a dispensation?

All Fridays, except for liturgical Solemnities, are days of penance even if one is doing something celebratory on that day. Congratulations, by the way, on your upcoming nuptials!

You can ask for a dispensation from your parish priest in individual cases.

You also have the privilege, in the United States, of substituting some other penance in lieu of abstaining from meat.

Now for my brief rant:

Would it not make a strong statement in favor of reviving Catholic culture were you as a couple, marrying on a Friday, to offer only meatless options at your reception?

It is certainly possible to do that without diminishing the celebration.

I’ll bet the readers here could think of zillions of great meal options that don’t include meat but are nonetheless both beautiful to look at and better to eat!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , ,
39 Comments

FATHERS! Is your wi-fi, your network, secure? BISHOPS! Read this and ponder!

Related to the news about Bp. Finn which I posted HERE, there is a story which ought to get the attention of, and scare to bits, every priest and bishop out there in the wide, hostile world.

First, the good news, HERE:

No child porn found on computers seized from Independence Catholic church

INDEPENDENCE, Mo – Computers seized from a Catholic church in Independence contained no child pornography, according to the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph.
In March, several computers were taken from St. Ann Parish after it was discovered somebody had used the church’s unprotected IP address.
“The parish had been using an unsecure, non-password protected wireless signal, so the files could have been downloaded either at the parish office or by someone within range of their wifi signal,” the Diocese said in a statement.
The Diocese says investigators are returning the computers taken from the church.

WHEW!

Men, secure that WI-FI! Secure your network!

Be sure your security on your wireless internet is functioning and effective. You might ask around the parish to see if there is some computer guy or gal who understands security and have your set up assessed.

Imagine: Some scumball loon connects to your unsecured wi-fi, cruises nasty sites, and then blows the whistle on you. On you. Some creepy sicko get’s into your network, puts bad things on one of your computers, and blows the whistle on you. On you.

Be careful out there. Things are going to get hot and you better make sure you are ready on all fronts.

Semper parati!

Bishops! Perhaps you might send a copy of this story to all the pastors of your diocese.

Click!

PS: Check out the great Demotivators stuff!  Funny!

 

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Semper Paratus | Tagged , ,
13 Comments

Judge rules: Bp. Finn cannot be held liable in a civil lawsuit against a priest

From Catholic World News:

Bishop Finn not liable in child-porn lawsuit, Missouri judge rules

A federal judge in Missouri has ruled that the Diocese of Kansas City (Missouri) and Bishop Robert Finn cannot be held liable in a civil lawsuit against a priest who had lewd photos of the plaintiff.

Father Shawn Ratigan, who has entered a guilty plea to child-pornography charges, is now the defendant in a civil lawsuit, brought by the family of a young girl whose photos were found on the priest’s computer. Judge Gary Fenner ruled that while that lawsuit can go forward, the plaintiff cannot argue that the diocese and Bishop Finn aided Ratigan in collecting the photos. Last September, Bishop Finn was found guilty on a criminal charge of failing to report evidence of child abuse. [If memory serves, guilty of one misdemeanor charge and innocent of another misdemeanor charge.] The bishop has consistently said that he was not fully informed of the nature of the photos found on Ratigan’s computer.

Posted in Clerical Sexual Abuse, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged ,
2 Comments

Again about validity of absolutions by SSPX priests

A priest reader sent me a link to an article on the site of The Remnant, which is I believe a bi-monthly newspaper staunchly on the traditional side of our Catholic spectrum.  The article in question concerns the validity of absolution of sins given by priests of the SSPX.  HERE

In a nutshell, the article argues that SSPX priests absolve validly.  I do not believe that to be true.   SSPX priests do not have faculties to receive sacramental confessions.  Period.  Faculties are necessary for validity.

I will not here replicate the piece from The Remnant.  Visit their site and read it on your own.   On the other hand, after consulting a canonist whom I trust can I offer this response.

The article in The Remnant is mostly another “Ecclesia supplet” argument which Jimmy Akin, among others, has handily proven faulty in these circumstances. HERE

The author of the Remnant piece decries that Rome has made no public official pronouncement on the matter. Therefore their confessions MUST be valid.

On the other hand, Rome has made an official pronouncement on the matter – it’s called the Code of Canon Law and it was issued in 1983.

Just to review, here are the key canons in the 1983 Code for the Latin Church (my emphasis):

Can. 966 §1 For the valid absolution of sins, it is required that, in addition to the power of order, the minister has the faculty to exercise that power in respect of the faithful to whom he gives absolution.

§2 A priest can be given this faculty either by the law itself, or by a concession issued by the competent authority in accordance with can. 969.

Can. 969 §1 Only the local Ordinary is competent to give to any priests whomsoever the faculty to hear the confessions of any whomsoever of the faithful. Priests who are members of religious institutes may not, however, use this faculty without the permission, at least presumed, of their Superior.

§2 The Superior of a religious institute or of a society of apostolic life, mentioned in can. 968 §2, is competent to give to any priests whomsoever the faculty to hear the confessions of his own subjects and of those others who live day and night in the house.

So, a man must be validly ordained and must have the Church’s permission to use the power to absolve sins validly.   That line about “the law itself” refers to a case of danger of death.  If someone is in danger of death, even a former priest validly absolves sins, even if he was a convicted pedophile or supporter of women’s ordination whose clerical status was removed.

The Remnant writer claims that canon 144 allows an SSPX priest to deem his own absolutions to be valid “due to legal common error”.  However, canon 144 is not for the individual priest to interpret. The legal error must be on the part of the one confessing.  For example, if I go to St. Ipsidipsy in Tall Tree Circle and confess my horrible black sins to a validly ordained priest in the confessional, but I am unaware that that priest’s faculties were suspended that very day, my sins would probably be forgiven.  I would be in error about the facts through no fault of my own.

So, the law is clear. No reasonable person, and I include SSPX priests in this category, can say that an SSPX priest has faculties to receive sacramental confessions and absolve. There is no reasonable error of law about this.

The author of the Remnant piece makes a false distinction about the accommodation the Catholic Church grants to the Orthodox.  He effectively argues “if THEIR absolutions are valid, then why aren’t OURS?!” That does not hold water.  If the SSPX are truly not schismatic, and if they are “merely” disobedient sons of Holy Church, then they should be held to a higher standard than the accommodation extended to the schismatic Orthodox.

If an SSPX priest is truly concerned about the validity of his absolutions, then he needs to find a bishop in communion with Rome and humbly beg that his situation be regularized.   I would go so far to say that if an SSPX priest even doubts that his absolutions may be invalid, then he ought to run, walk, limp or crawl to a friendly diocesan Catholic bishop and beg to be regularized.

I’ll bet that in most cases a diocesan bishop would find some work for the man which would include celebration of the sacraments in the older form.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , , , , ,
41 Comments

Edgewood College to have a “Dominican Catholic mass”?

A reader sent me a link to the site of the Dominican-run Edgewood College in the Diocese of Madison.  HERE

A Dominican Catholic mass welcoming and embracing all faith traditions. Please bring your family to this celebration of Edgewood College! RSVP is appreciated.

From a quick reading, doesn’t it sound as if they are having Mass in the traditional, Dominican Rite?

Okay… Mass didn’t merit a capital letter, and there is that odd phrase “embracing all faith traditions”.

Perhaps the “Dominican Catholic mass” means that the celebrant will preach against Albigensians.

 

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged , , ,
18 Comments

Ramifications of the new normal

With the rise of the homosexualist agenda I am seeing more news reports, on both sides of the pond, about state sponsored “anti-bullying” campaigns for children in schools.

I really dislike bullies, which is one reason why I go after liberals with such frequency.  They are bullies.

I am concerned, however, that these school “anti-bullying” campaigns, sometimes advertised with the additional “anti-homophobic” bullying campaigns, are really excuses for pro-homosexual sex campaigns.

This is going to be recruiting on the part of those advancing “the new normal”.

Therefore, one component of the “anti-bullying” campaigns will be precisely an insidious form of bullying: shaming.

Children will be forced to repudiate the vestiges of Christian values they have gained from their families.  If they don’t, they will be systematically shamed, bullied, by teachers and administrators until they conform.

If this goes as I fear, the homeschool movement will with justification grow.   Then the state will attack homeschooling.

The ramifications of “the new normal”, which is nothing like the true normal, may be wide-reaching indeed.

We shall know swiftly.

Posted in One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , ,
66 Comments