Three years ago today, Pope Benedict XVI abdicated.
My posts from that sad, remarkable day, HERE.

For your interest and edification, Benedict’s Last Official Speech.
Three years ago today, Pope Benedict XVI abdicated.
My posts from that sad, remarkable day, HERE.

For your interest and edification, Benedict’s Last Official Speech.
This is amusing via PJ Media:
Time Magazine: Evelyn Waugh, Leading Woman Writer
This never would have happened back in my day. David Harsanyi caught the flub:
TIME magazine asks: “What do 1 million reading lists reveal about higher education today?” [Indeed, what? Are students reading something other than text messages?] Well, what it reveals is that someone at TIME shouldn’t be writing about reading lists.
There are many unsurprising names compiled by the Open Syllabus Project. And according to TIME’s “analysis,” Toni Morrison, Jane Austen, and Virginia Woolf, all rank in the top 10. But for some reason, and this had me laughing out loud, George Eliot was accidentally included on the women’s list.
That’s a joke, in case you don’t get it… [George Eliot is the pen-name of a women, Mary Ann Evans.]
In any event, college-aged women are devouring some eclectic authors, everything from the individualist tracts of Ayn Rand to the dystopian fiction of Margaret Atwood and Naomi Klein. But I was most excited to see Evelyn Waugh, author of Brideshead Revisited and Scoop, one of my favorite novels ever, sneaking in at #97. She is awesome.
Most of the names on the list are of persons of the female persuasion that you’ve never heard of. Here’s why:
MethodologyThe Open Syllabus Project collected 1.1 million syllabi (of an estimated 80 to 100 million in existence) in the U.S., United Kingdom, Australia and Canada that date from the past 15 years to compile a list of the 10,000 most-assigned books, short stories, journal articles and screenplays (the majority of the course assignments are from the past decade). TIME aggregated the top 10,000 titles by author, then used the Notable Names Database to confirm the author’s gender [sex] and generate a list of 100 most-read female authors.
Oops.
Correction: The original version of this story included Evelyn Waugh, who was a man.
The very masculine author of Black Mischief, Vile Bodies, Scoop and The Loved Onecould not be reached for comment.
It’s funny and sad at the same time.
At the Getty Museum in Los Angeles there is now a splendid exhibit of tapestries of Louis XIV of France.
This exhibit prompted a friend to forward the following about the birth of King Louis XIV and about one of my favorite Marian titles.
“My child, this is not my Son, it is the child that God wants to give to France”
The King of France Louis XIII founded the church of Notre-Dame des Victoires (Our Lady of Victories) in Paris in 1629, in thanksgiving for the victory of the royal troops in La Rochelle against the Protestant Huguenots, whose surrender the king attributed to the intervention of the Virgin.
On December 8, 1629, the eve of the laying of the first stone of the church, and feast of the Immaculate Conception, Brother Fiacre, an Augustinian friar, saw the Virgin Mary in a vision. She presented to him the child that God wanted to give France, the future Louis XIV, saying: “My child, do not be afraid, I am the Mother of God… My child, this is not my son, it is the child that God wants to give to France.”
In this vision, reported to the King and the Queen, the Virgin asked for three novenas to be offered to Our Lady of Graces (a Marian shrine located in Cotignac, southern region of Provence), Our Lady of Paris and Our Lady of Victories. Brother Fiacre prayed these three novenas himself from November 8 to December 5, 1637.
Exactly nine months later, on September 5, 1638, the queen gave birth to a son, Louis, called “Dieudonné” (God Given). On account of the vision of Brother Fiacre, Louis XIII consecrated France to the Virgin Mary. On January 6, 1638, the text of the Royal Vow was adopted, and it was signed on February 10th. This document fixed the date of the official consecration of France to August 15th of the same year in the cathedral of Notre-Dame de Paris.
An interesting Marian post for Our Lady’s Saturday.
How stupid do things have to get before we either come to our senses and start behaving normally or have violent whiplashes?
From CBS in Philly.
Catholic League Wrestler Will Not Wrestle Girl In District Tournament
PHILADELPHIA (CBS) — After the Philadelphia Archdiocese revised its rule and for the first time was going to allow a Catholic league male wrestler to take on a female wrestler, a new development has switched things up. [The Archdiocese revised its rule?]
Another wrestler had to drop out of the tournament. Now, Tatyana Ortiz, from Mariana Bracetti Charter School, will take on a male from the public league.
For Catholic high schools in Philadelphia, men and women competing in contact sports has been a no-no. That rule almost meant a potentially career-ending forfeit for Tim McCall this weekend.
That is until a surprising change of heart.
Eyewitness News reached out to the Philadelphia Archdiocese earlier in the week and prompted this response:
“The decision to take part in any post season individual championship PIAA wrestling match will be at the discretion of the individual student and his parents.” – Ken Gavin, Archdiocese of Philadelphia Spokesperson.
Meaning Tim McCall could wrestle Tatyana Ortiz after all. But again, with the bracket revision, she will now take on a boy from the public league instead of Father Judge’s McCall.
Who thinks this is a dreadful idea?
What does a guy do in a situation like this? Go into the ring and bust her in half? Would that be right? Go into the ring and risk losing because you can’t do what is necessary to win and still be … decent?
I am reminded of Chariots of Fire… of Sandy Koufax….
I just had some super news – truly – about a great development for the New Evangelization.
I can’t say what it is yet because the right people have to make this public. Still it is exciting enough that I want to say something good happened and then ask…
… do you have good news?
I know I asked recently.
From a reader…
With contraception back in the news, a hypothetical question came to my mind. If a couple that has sterilized themselves converts to the faith, what would the church require of them? Contraceptive marital acts are immoral, so would the church require them to abstain from marital acts? To get the sterilization reversed (which can be cost prohibitive)? Or would the church see it more as a medical condition (albeit one that the couple brought upon themselves)?
Having repented of their sinful actions and having confessed their sins and having received absolution, they may receive Holy Communion and continue in their vocations to help each other get to heaven.
Now that the sterilization is a fact, they are not obliged to seek a reversal of the procedure. It is praiseworthy that they do and they may, but they are not strictly obliged. It is now and existing condition and they are not strictly obliged to reverse it.
They may engage in marital relations.
It seems to me that it would be good for that couple to live a continent life and pay close attention to penances and mortifications in an ongoing way.
At this point it is necessary to remind people that God cannot be fooled. Someone who would go in for a sterilization thinking “I’ll just confess it later and I am off the hook for good!” would be committing a truly appalling sin. Such an attitude would be perilous indeed and I would tremble for such a person’s fate. It shows a callousness about God’s mercy that might verge on being unforgivable without a sincere and deep conversion.
There is nothing that we poor little mortals can do that is so bad that God will not forgive it and remove the stain of the sin from our souls in confession provided that we are truly sorry and that we intend to amend our lives.
From a reader…
QUAERITUR:
A committed Church of England man, Steve, married Jenny, a Catholic who had baptism, 1st communion, confirmation in the Faith. She in full knowledge of her large Catholic family did not seek a dispensation for their wedding in a CofE church. She has blocked their 2 children from being baptized in the CofE but didn’t agree to Steve’s suggestion of baptism in a Catholic church. She never moved away from her family geographically or emotionally. Jenny only ever goes to church some distance away from her home area. He has been a good father and husband, but she is now suing for divorce. No 3rd parties are involved. He is quite rich and suspects an in-law conspiracy, especially after I told him of Catholic marriage law – English non-Catholics really do not know any problems can possibly exist. As a Catholic in those circumstances, can Jenny be accused of entering into the marriage in bad faith?
Cutting through all this drama…
As Catholics, we are obliged to follow the Church’s laws on marriage. If we (or rather you, since my attempt at marriage would be invalid for other reasons, can. 1087), marry outside the Church without a dispensation, the marriage is not valid.
In this case, regardless of whether Jenny entered into her union with Steve out of good faith, or bad faith, or a mix of the two, the marriage is invalid in the eyes of the Church because one party was Catholic and did not observe canonical form.
Here’s some good news! Via Church Militant.
His Excellency Most Reverend Michael Burbidge, Bishop of Raleigh, has forbidden a dissident priest from talking at a Catholic institution in the diocese.
Bishop Michael Burbidge is rescinding an invitation to Fr. Michael Crosby, OFM Cap
RALEIGH, N.C. (ChurchMilitant.com) – The head of the Raleigh diocese is rescinding a speaking invitation to a dissident priest.Father Michael Crosby, a Franciscan priest well known for dissenting on Church teaching with regard to clerical celibacy, female ordination and homosexuality, was scheduled to give a Lenten mission at St. Stephen the First Martyr parish in Sanford March 12–16.
He was going to be the homilist for the weekend English Masses, and then give talks for the following three days. The title of his mission was “Obstacles and Occasions of Grace to Fulfill the Great Command.”
Earlier this week, ChurchMilitant.com contacted Bp. Michael Burbidge, head of the Raleigh diocese, to inquire about the event. Thursday morning, we received an email from William Atwell, diocesan communications director, informing us that Fr. Crosby’s speaking engagement was being canceled.
“We have reviewed this matter with all appropriate parties,” Atwell stated, “with the result being that Father Crosby will not be speaking in the Diocese of Raleigh.”
[…]
Fr. Z kudos.
There are still reassuring indications of sanity in some places.
QUAERITUR:
I’ve been reading the Celebration of Mass by J.B. o Connell and at the section concerning the consecration of the Host O’Connell writes that a priest should not say a vocal prayer at the elevation, obviously, but the annotation on the bottom of the page continues to say that the priest should not even say “my lord and my God” in a low voice (and implied even saying it mentally) as to be in accordance with the (old) canon law (818, to be exact). So my question(s) are bit of a tricky one. Can a priest say the ejaculation now that we don’t follow the old code? Is the old code still valid? Does it affect the Mass if it is?
The old Code is not in force now. That doesn’t mean that it doesn’t contain good guidance in many matters.
If you flip open the pages of the Missale Romanum to the consecration you will not find any indication that the priest must, can, should, could, may add his own prayers during the elevation. Unless you are a Fishwrap reader, most would agree that the two-fold consecration and elevation is a pretty important part of Mass. As such it deserves precision and restraint. Father shouldn’t impose his own devotional practices on everyone present when the rubrics themselves give indications of what he should do in favor of the devotion of the faithful. This is a greater danger in, I think, the Novus Ordo, which has an inherent looseness born of optionitis and which is mostly celebrated versus populum, which can lead a priest to drift into exhibitionism.
That said, there are a lot of things that are left undescribed in the Missale Romanum, such as how long an elevation ought to be. There is a bit of room for personal choices even at this moment. I admit to varying the length of elevations, depending on the occasion and mood and my sense of how Mass is proceeding.
It seems to me that if Holy Mass is celebrated ad orientem, where there is little chance that the congregation will see that the priest is saying something during the elevation – which could lead to distraction, confusion, questions, speculation, imitation, etc. – not much harm is done were a priest to say or mouth the words, “My Lord and my God!” Just why he would think it so important to utter them aloud at that moment is not clear to me. I would like to think that most priests are capable of thinking something without actually having to say it aloud.
Over the years I’ve been able to summon the self-control to think “My Lord and my God!” during the elevation, and ponder the weight of the moment and reality, without saying anything aloud. Yes, yes… it strains credulity. We all know clerics who suffer from a version of ecclesiastical Tourette’s.
The wisdom of our forebears should inform our choices in these matters. They were experts on humanity, after all. If they said DON’T do this, there are good reasons.
So, in this case, Say The Black, Don’t Say The Stuff That’s Not There, Do The Red.