MYSTIC MONK COFFEE K-CUPS NOW AVAILABLE – What do they call them? Click and learn!

URGENT UPDATE!

I just had a note from “Brother Java” of the Wyoming Carmelites.

On your behalf I wrote to suggest decaf in K-Cups as well.  Here is the response:

Dear Father,

Thanks for the suggestion!  We’re going to add Decaf Arabica, Midnight Vigils Blend, Cinnamon Coffee Cake and Royal Rum Pecan to our Monk-Shot range.  The Cinnamon Coffee Cake and Royal Rum Pecan will be the next ones available and the others (hopefully) within the next few weeks.

Ask, and it shall be given.

_____

ORIGINAL POST:

For all of you who have been longing for Mystic Monk in K-Cups for your fancy coffee machines…

TA DA!

Monk Shots.

Click and buy.

They explain:

Our Monk-Shots are compatible with all major single serve brewers including Keurig ®, Breville ®, Mr. Coffee ® and Cuisinart ®, single-serve machines. Each pod contains up to 20% more coffee than most major pod brands, [!] making for a richer, fuller cup. Unlike other single-serve options, our Monk-Shots are made with recyclable materials. Our best selling regular coffee, Breakfast Blend has rich and complex notes of cedar and baking spice. The mouthfeel is smooth and aftertaste lingering. Recommended for any time of the day!

Warning: Our Monk-Shots are stronger than regular single serve coffee pods [Do I hear an “Amen”?] and can produce far more coffee with a much more delicious taste. This taste is due to the freshness, quality and amount of coffee in each Monk-Shot.

(Use the larger size cup setting for a normal cup of coffee and less for a very delicious strong coffee. We recommend using the 10 oz setting on your machine for a normal cup.)

14 x Single Serve Monk-Shots

And… they have GIFT CARDS!

And… they have small sample packs (nine pack and thirty pack and MUG sampler… but buy my mugs instead). Perfect small gifts or stocking stuffers.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
17 Comments

The Economist: A traditionalist avant-garde

We are in The Economist this week.  It is a pretty good article, all in all.  There are a couple little glitches, but they don’t touch the substance.  Enjoy!

My emphases and comments.

A traditionalist avant-garde
It’s trendy to be a traditionalist in the Catholic church

SINCE the Second Vatican Council in 1962, the Roman Catholic church has striven to adapt to the modern world. But in the West—where many hoped a contemporary message would go down best—believers have left in droves. Sunday mass attendance in England and Wales has fallen by half from the 1.8m recorded in 1960; the average age of parishioners has risen from 37 in 1980 to 52 now. In America attendance has declined by over a third since 1960. Less than 5% of French Catholics attend regularly, and only 15% in Italy.  [But remember… Vatican II produced many wonderful things!] Yet as the mainstream wanes, traditionalists wax.

Take the Latin mass, dumped by the Vatican in 1962 for liturgies in vernacular languages. [Umm… not quite. It was after 1962, but let that pass.  The date is not of the essence.] In its most traditional form, the priest consecrates the bread and wine in a whisper with his back to the congregation [That old “back to the people” chestnut again?  Sigh.]: anathema to those who think openness is the spirit of the age. But Father John Zuhlsdorf, an American priest and blogger, [Him again?] says it challenges worshippers, unlike the cosy liberalism of the regular services. “It is not just a school assembly,” he says.

Others share his enthusiasm. The Latin Mass Society of England and Wales, started in 1965, now has over 5,000 members. The weekly number of Latin masses is up from 26 in 2007 to 157 now. In America it is up from 60 in 1991 to 420. At Brompton Oratory, a hotspot of London traditionalism, 440 flock to the main Sunday Latin mass. That is twice the figure for the main English one. Women sport mantillas (lace headscarves). Men wear tweeds. [Shouldn’t that be “wear mantillas… sport tweeds”?]

But it is not a fogeys’ hangout: the congregation is young and international. Like evangelical Christianity, traditional Catholicism is attracting people who were not even born when the Second Vatican Council tried to rejuvenate the church. Traditionalist groups have members in 34 countries, including Hong Kong, South Africa and Belarus. Juventutem, a movement for young Catholics who like the old ways, boasts scores of activists in a dozen countries. Traditionalists use blogs, websites and social media to spread the word—and to highlight recalcitrant liberal dioceses and church administrators, who have long seen the Latinists as a self-indulgent, anachronistic and affected minority. In Colombia 500 people wanting a traditional mass had to use a community hall (they later found a church).

A big shift came in 2007 when Pope Benedict XVI formally endorsed the use of the old-rite Latin mass. Until that point, fondness for the traditional liturgy could blight a priest’s career. The cause has also received new vim from the Ordinariate, a Vatican-sponsored grouping for ex-Anglicans. Dozens of Anglican priests have “crossed the Tiber” from the heavily ritualistic “smells and bells” high-church wing; they find a ready welcome among traditionalist Roman Catholics.  [And not mainly because of liturgical sensibilities, though liturgy is doctrine, but because of open, clear adherence to the Church’s teachings in union with the Roman Pontiff.]

The return of the old rite causes quiet consternation among more modernist Catholics. [And not so quiet, too.] Timothy Radcliffe, once head of Britain’s Dominicans, sees in it “a sort of ‘Brideshead Revisited’ nostalgia”. [LOL!  Nice deflection Timmy, old shoe.  You can see his game with that reference, right?] The traditionalist revival, he thinks, is a reaction against the “trendy liberalism” of his generation. Some swings of pendulums may be inevitable. But for a church hierarchy in Western countries beset by scandal and decline, the rise of a traditionalist avant-garde is unsettling. Is it merely an outcrop of eccentricity, or a sign that the church took a wrong turn 50 years ago?

There is an open combox under this piece over the site of The Economist.  I’m just sayin’…

Click HERE.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Liberals, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices, Vatican II | Tagged
22 Comments

Ladies, still worried about those final Christmas preparations? Fr. Z is here to help.

When in doubt about your Christmas gift list, Fr. Z suggests…

  1. stuff on amazon through Fr. Z’s links
  2. stuff from Fr. Z’s store
  3. stuff (=coffee) from the Wyoming Carmelites using Fr. Z’s links (new K-Cups!)
  4. lots of ammo and guns

Not necessarily in that order.

I don’t have an affiliate program with any ammo suppliers yet, otherwise I would suggest you use my link for that, too.

Perhaps this will help.  A tip of the biretta and beretta to Fr. H and Mr. K:

[wp_youtube]0UqEhUm2B_8[/wp_youtube]

Just to help you get even more into the Christmas buying frenzy, check out this fine piece of classic literature, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, sort of by emerging author Jane Austen.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged , , , , ,
12 Comments

“No tiger in its Armenian lair would do it, no lioness … But tender girls do it, though not un-punished”

I have posted this in the past, but it has been a while.  Perhaps new readers here have not seen this before.  I thought of it because, at the end, I post a video which a reader sent.

___

Today I step out of my patristicist shoes and take off my theologian’s cap, to become for a moment what I started out as lo those many years ago: a classicist.

TV representations of ancient Rome often give you the impression of unbridled licence and unchecked immorality.  In fact, the ancient Romans were, just like all normal people, rather conservative in their views.   They were, as a matter of fact, quite negative about abortion.  Yes, it is true that there was infanticide at times, as in many cultures, but I suspect that was mostly among the very wealthy.

In any event, the ancient poet Ovid has something to say about abortion.  Here are two of his elegies from the Amores (not my translation) which say something about the attitudes of common people.

I find these two poems provocative and moving.

Keep in mind that Ovid is one of those Neoteric poets, men who rejected the very long, epic style of poem, in favor of shorter, snapshots.  They also like to use lots of fancy references and hints to other places and people: sort of like post-modernists do when they write.

In this first elegy, a frightened Ovid is relieved that his mistress “Corinna” survived an abortion, from which she nearly died.  My emphases.

Book II Elegy XIII: The Abortion

Corinna lies there exhausted in danger of her life,
after rashly destroying the burden of an unborn child.
I should be angry: she took that great risk
and hid it from me: but anger’s quelled by fear.
All the same it’s me by whom she conceived – or I think so:
I often take things for facts that only might be.
Isis, of Paraetonium, and the joyful fields of Canopus,
you who protect Memphis, and palmy Pharos,
and the land where the swift Nile spreads in its wide delta,
its waters flowing through seven mouths to the sea,
by your sistrum I pray, by the sacred head of Anubis –
so may Osiris love your holy rites for ever,
and the slow serpent glide about your altar,
and the horned Apis follow your procession!
Turn your face towards us, and spare both in one!
Then you will grant life to her, and she to me.

Often she’s taken pains to attend your special days,
when Gallic laurel crowns your worshippers.
And you, Ilythia, who pity girls struggling in labour,
whose hidden child strains their reluctant body,
be gentle with her and hear my prayers!
It’s proper for you to demand gifts for yourself.
I myself, in white, will burn incense on your smoking altars,
I myself will lay at your feet the gifts I vowed.
I’ll add an inscription: ‘Naso, for saving Corinna!’
Make that occasion soon, for the inscription and the gifts.
If it’s still possible to warn you, girl, in such a state of fear,
let it be enough for you to have fought this one battle!

Abortion also scares, and scars, men.

At the time Ovid was writing, some Egyptian mystery religions were big in Rome.  Thus all the references to slithering.  But there is no self-deception about the poet’s own feelings.  In this poem, de-Nile is just a river in Egypt.

Were Ovid a Catholic, he might be writing about lighting a candle or having Masses said.  Some things are universal, aren’t they?

Ovid had the amazing ability, perhaps unlike any other Latin poet we have, of turning out verse after verse of gorgeous flowing words.  Simply amazing talent.

The next poem also concerns abortion, but this time we see revealed something of the attitudes of the masses.  Read carefully and note also the comparison he uses.

Book II Elegy XIV: Against Abortion

Where’s the joy in a girl being free from fighting wars,
unwilling to follow the army and their shields,
if without battle she suffers wounds from her own weapons,
and arms unsure hands to her own doom?
Whoever first taught the destruction of a tender foetus,
deserved to die by her own warlike methods.

No doubt you’d chance your arm in that dismal arena
just to keep your belly free of wrinkles with your crime?
If the same practice had pleased mothers of old,
Humanity would have been destroyed by that violation.
and we’d need a creator again for each of our peoples
to throw the stones that made us onto the empty earth.
Who would have shattered the wealth of Priam, if Thetis,
the sea goddess, had refused to carry her rightful burden?

If Ilia had murdered the twins in her swollen womb,
the founder of my mistress’s City would have been lost.
If Venus had desecrated her belly, pregnant with Aeneas,
Earth would have been bereft of future Caesars.
You too, with your beauty still to be born, would have died,
if your mother had tried what you have done:
I myself would be better to die making love
than have been denied the light of day by my mother.

Why rob the loaded vine of burgeoning grapes,
or pluck the unripe apple with cruel hand?
Let things mature themselves – grow without being forced:
life is a prize that’s worth a little waiting.
Why submit your womb to probing instruments,
or give lethal poison to what is not yet born?
Medea is blamed for sprinkling the blood of her children,
and Itys, slain by his mother, is lamented with tears:
both cruel parents, yet both had bitter reason
to shed blood, revenge on a husband.
Say, what Tereus, what Jason incites you
to pierce your troubled body with your hand?
No tiger in its Armenian lair would do it,
no lioness would dare destroy her foetus.
But tender girls do it, though not un-punished:
often she who kills her child, dies herself.
She dies, and is carried to the pyre with loosened hair,
and whoever looks on cries out: ‘She deserved it!’
But let these words vanish on the ethereal breeze,
and let my imprecations have no weight!
You gods, prosper her: let her first sin go, in safety,
and be satisfied: you can punish her second crime!

The poet’s rage and sorrow are nearly palpable.

Who knows what Einsteins or St. Francis of Assisis have been killed before birth?

Doesn’t this also say something about the poet’s sense of the role of women in society, in life?

He seems to be saying that women are, by their very nature, deeply connected to giving life, not taking it.  Thus, Ovid uses military imagery and then references the animal kingdom.  “Not even lionesses do this!”   The masses of people who see the funeral of the girl who dies from the abortion are also enraged.

Every once in a while it is good to turn to different times and cultures for a reality check.

___

Now the video.

[wp_youtube]1zgJzuHEIfc[/wp_youtube]

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Linking Back | Tagged ,
11 Comments

QUAERITUR: Whither Papal Tweets?

What I really want to know:

In which section of the Acta Apostolicae Sedis are the Holy Father’s tweets going to be published?

Which theological note will they be assigned?

Posted in Benedict XVI, Lighter fare, New Evangelization | Tagged , , , , ,
14 Comments

Antinomianism

At American Thinker there is a thought provoking piece on antinomianism:

Antinomianism: The Soft Heresy
By Daniel Ciofani

[…]

Here is the definition:
an•ti•no•mi•an•ism (noun)
1. Theology; The doctrine or belief that the Gospel frees Christians from required obedience to any law, whether scriptural, civil, or moral, and that salvation is attained solely through faith and the gift of divine grace.
2. The belief that moral laws are relative in meaning and application as opposed to fixed or universal.
In case you are wondering, Antinomianism is a Christian heresy. This gentle and soft heresy is popular for many reasons. First, it’s very old. The original Antinomians were Gnostics. They believed that Christianity was a secretive and privileged message that only the learned understood. They were the climate-changers of their day. The Gnostics held those who just didn’t get it in contempt. With that secret knowledge, you could do whatever you wanted in this life, because the material world was ultimately unimportant. Antinomianism made a return during the Reformation, and Luther had to formally put the heresy in its place. Sure, the Just shall live by Faith. Sure, good works don’t get the job done. However; Faith and bad works means all bets are off. Even the Council of Trent made a case for its specific heresy. All Christians get to clearly understand this one: antinomianism is an equal opportunity Salvation destroyer.
Today Antinomianism is alive and well in all churches. We have all met many Antinomians. They are the Christians comfortable with bankrupting the country and confiscating others’ property. They are Christians who somehow believe that Salvation has a quota based on skin color. They are the pro-choice Catholics, and the Anglicans who encourage the homosexual clergy. They include the Lutherans who pray long and hard for their church to finally move from Sola Scriptura to Some-a-Scriptura. They are even the Evangelicals who actively await the destructive end, while not even voting to prevent it. They are Saved, so they do whatever they want, even if it’s deadly. All of these Christians use their gift of Faith as an escape valve for their own irresponsible moral, religious, and Biblical decisions and public policy.
And so the next time you attend church, (assuming you still can stomach attending since November 6th) ask your spiritual leader if he or she is an Antinomian. Most will say that they’ll have to get back to you on this one, while they go and look it up. When they do respond, they’ll contend, of course not! You’ll then have to ask them to describe one religious law of the faithful, defended strongly by your church in secular society. If your spiritual leader has no response, then you have met another Antinomian. No matter how the conversation goes, it is common practice for all religious leaders to suggest, for the sake of the Church, that you pray on it. In the meantime, for the sake of the Church, the Devil too, will be preying on it.

Posted in New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged
9 Comments

Scientists experiment on Sedevacantist, determine stress from Novus Ordo

From the amusing Eye of the Tiber:

Scientists Test Effects of Novus Ordo On Longtime Sedevacantist

Los Angeles, CA–Attempting to explain the physical and emotional toll that an average Sedevacantist would endure during a Novus Ordo, students at UCLA have recently begun tests on 54-year-old Sedevacantist John Weiss of Glendale, California. ”Thus far the results have been quite fascinating,” Head of the Department of Sciences at UCLA Dr. William Manders told Eye of the Tiber. “We began by strapping Mr. Weiss in a pew beside a man wearing shorts. After placing eye clips over his eyes to keep his lids from shutting, we had a woman wearing a tanktop sit directly in front of him. You could immediately see that Mr. Weiss was beginning to sweat and was becoming extremely anxious…almost agitated.”

With the help of the UCLA Theatre Department, Manders began a battery of tests on Weiss, which included a staged Novus Ordo. “It appears as though the moment Mr. Weiss runs across anything remotely sentimental during the Mass, such as a smile on the a priest’s face, his heart rate begins to rise and he begins to mutter what seem to be bitter remarks. At one point Mr. Weiss became quite physical when one of our mock parishioners went to hold his hand during the Our Father. Luckily, we already had placed a taser collar on him, which we were quick to use.”

One department faculty member said she became worried for the “poor soul” when the mock congregation, led by a bearded, ponytailed guitarist, began to sing One Bread, One Body. “He was beginning to twitch for goodness sakes, and I knew then that that was about as much as I could endure. By the time I left he was foaming at the mouth. Don’t they have sedevacantist mice they could test on?”

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
30 Comments

Pipiavit @Pontifex – FOLLOW UP and POLL

The Pope sent his first tweet.

[wp_youtube]gy4sNYmfpt8[/wp_youtube]

UPDATE 12/12/12 22:36 GMT:

The Pope has something around 1.5 million followers across his various language oriented accounts.  English is the leader with close to a million.  The number is going up by 10k each time I check it, it seems.

So far he has 7 tweets.

Tweets All / No replies

Offer everything you do to the Lord, ask his help in all the circumstances of daily life and remember that he is always beside you

Any suggestions on how to be more prayerful when we are so busy with the demands of work, families and the world?

We can be certain that a believer is never alone. God is the solid rock upon which we build our lives and his love is always faithful

How can faith in Jesus be lived in a world without hope?

By speaking with Jesus in prayer, listening to what he tells you in the Gospel and looking for him in those in need

How can we celebrate the Year of Faith better in our daily lives?

Dear friends, I am pleased to get in touch with you through Twitter. Thank you for your generous response. I bless all of you from my heart.

 

I have been watching a little of the @pontifex feed.

Pretty strange and pretty much as I knew it would be.

The deeply twisted and the profoundly dumb are out in force.

The insults have mostly to do with perversion (homosexual acts) and scatology.

Honestly, some of these people write things that are so stupid I marvel that they even know how to breathe.

So far, I am confirmed in my opinion that it would have been better for the Holy Father’s cat to have a Twitter feed.

Time will tell what fruits this will produce.

By the way, I am unconvinced that Popes should tweet.  There, I said it.  Yes, I know about social media and the New Evangelization.  Blah blah blah….

Choose your best answer and give your reasons in the combox.  You don’t have to be registered to vote, but you do have to have an approved registration to post.

Should Popes tweet?

View Results

I am not quite at this point, but…

UPDATE 13 Dec 1812 GMT:

In the meantime, I just caught this from a bigwig on the Pontifical Council for Social Communication:

The Twitting Bishop @raspanti speaks about the Twitting Pope @pontifex: http://ow.ly/g4RyR  (in Italian)

 

Posted in Benedict XVI, Brick by Brick, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
59 Comments

Archd. Seattle: No same-sex marriages, receptions, preparations, events. Period.

From the Canonical Defender, Prof. Ed Peters at his excellent blog In The Light Of The Law:

Seattle’s got it right
by Dr. Edward Peters

That we even have to go over this is . . . well . . . we have to go over it, so let’s.

The Archdiocese of Seattle has published four ‘policy refresher’ points regarding Catholic ministration in regard to “gay weddings”. [I object to the use of “gay” like this.  “Unnatural”… “same-sex”… “fake”… these will fit, however.] Here are Seattle’s policies in bold and my suggestions as to underlying rationales for same in regular print.

1. No priest or deacon or lay minister may officiate at a same-sex “marriage.”

Before a wedding is conducted, “it must be evident that nothing stands in the way of its valid or licit celebration” (c. 1066). Canon law defines marriage as the union of a man and a women (c. 1055 § 1). [Mean old backward Church!] Because marriage cannot arise between two men or two women, something obviously “stands in the way” of the valid and licit performing a “gay wedding”. QED. By the way, Catholic officials who attempt nevertheless to perform such “weddings” are liable to punishment under Canon 1389 § 1 for abuse of office. [Get that?]

2. No church facility or school facility may be offered for such an event, even if it is to be witnessed by a non-Catholic minister or civil official.
This seems a sound application of, among other strictures, the moral prohibition against doing evil (CCC 1707), here, by rendering proximate material cooperation to objectively evil acts (by providing a venue for same sex couples specifically to hold themselves out as marrying).

3. No church facility or school facility may be used for a reception after such an event. [I wonder if this isn’t how the activists are going to attack.  They’ll sue when they are denied hall rental.]
This seems to fall under, among other strictures, the moral prohibition against doing evil (CCC 1707), here, by rendering at-least remote, if not proximate, material cooperation to objectively evil acts (by providing a venue for same sex couples to celebrate specifically their holding themselves out as having married).

4. No church ministers, ordained or lay, may offer “wedding preparation” for such couples.
This seems to fall under, among other strictures, the moral prohibition against doing evil (CCC 1707), here, by rendering formal cooperation with objectively evil acts (namely, by instructing couples precisely in how to assume a status in the Church that they cannot assume, this by, in most instances moreover, their simulating a sacrament contrary to c. 1379).

Quid putatis, lectores?

I will take up what Peters (wrong about some things, right about this thing) said at the top.  It is nearly unthinkable that a diocese would have to clarify these things… but for the fact that it in entirely thinkable that a diocese would have to clarify these things.  And clarify them not only ad extra but also ad intra.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , , , ,
44 Comments

Madison State Journal: Bp. Morlino “cracks down” on loony nuns (ACTION ITEM!) – UPDATED

The State Journal of Madison has a breathy article about a recent move by His Excellency Most Reverend Robert C. Morlino.

Bishop Robert Morlino cracks down on Madison nuns for espousing ‘New Ageism’ and ‘indifferentism’

Morlino sent a memo to the priests of the diocese of Madison not to allow some loony nuns and a couple of their acolytes to have workshops, do spiritual direction, etc., at their parishes or other diocesan institutions.  The memo was, of course, leaked to the press as the chancery mandarins knew it would be… or should have known.

The women, who are connected to an “interfaith” center called “Wisdom’s Well”, are into some pretty strange stuff.  A couple of them are Sinsinawa Dominican nuns.  If you know anything about that group, then you have the basics.  Think Macbeth.  One of them left their bonfire lit labyrinth long enough to torture me and my friends at St. Paul Seminary years ago.  Let’s just say that clearly I remember those days, and her, and all her ilk.  But I digress.

In any event, His Excellency is going to take another one on the chin in the local paper… as if he cares.

A link to the secular paper’s article is HERE. The article isn’t blatantly skewed but it slants in the direction you would imagine in a town like Madison: women enlightened and oppressed by mean male bishop.

That said, I would like to plug an effort to create a spiritual bouquet for Bishop Morlino for his birthday on 31 December.

Please help!  Click HERE.

UPDATE:

The Diocese of Madison has issued some clarifications in the wake of the secular paper’s story.  HERE.   One of the main points is that Bp. Morlino is not cracking down on all women religious in the diocese, just these odd balls associated with that group.

UPDATE 12/12/12 19:06 GMT:

Bp. Morlino was pretty viciously attacked in a Madison publication which, as far as I can tell, is little more than a shopper insert or one of those cat-box liners you can pick up for free on wire stands inside the doorways of gas stations.  No… wait… maybe it’s only digital.  I don’t know.

The writer, styling himself “Citizen Dave”… inspired by the French Revolution, I guess… aka Dave Cieslewicz is the former mayor of the city of Madison (he lost his last mayoral election bid).  He is, big surprise, a Democrat and a “former Catholic”.

Let’s have a taste:

Citizen Dave: Bishop Morlino is failing Madison

Bishop Robert Morlino is failing badly in his role as a community leader. If the Catholic Church had any sense, they would replace him with someone more in touch with the community he should be serving. Of course, they won’t.

I don’t say this as a church hater. I grew up in a more or less devout Catholic family, and I had twelve years of Catholic education through elementary and high school. My father’s uncle was the priest in our parish. I even find myself in the odd role of defender of the faith when some non-Catholic goes off on the church. My feeling is that only those who have had their knuckles wrapped by Sister Mary Katherine get to dis the faith, I guess.

But I stopped being a practicing Catholic when I was twenty and, truth is, I stopped buying into any of it while at Thomas More High School. Ironically, the good education given to me by the Brothers of Mary taught me to think critically, and Catholicism just didn’t hold up very well to critical thinking. If you aren’t willing to accept the answer to every hard question as “it’s a mystery,” well, then it’s pretty hard to remain a Catholic.

Moreover, even as a young kid I thought that the people who were the most outwardly religious were the least likeable people I knew. There was nothing — intellectually or socially — to hold me in the church.

[…]

I am sure this guy’s column has tens of regular readers, perhaps extended family.  My linking to it will probably get him more attention in a day than he otherwise gets in a year.  Oh well.

Again, please use the link, above, to contribute to the spiritual bouquet for Bp. Morlino.

Another thing you could do to help is send an online donation to support the diocese’s seminarians. The diocese has 35 seminarians right now, if I am not mistaken.  They have foundation that budget for only 2 per year, which means that they are way over their budget to pay for the formation of the seminarians.

I have met some of these men.  They are great.  Also, Bishop Morlino has told them -and I heard this with my own ears – that he expects all of them to know the Extraordinary Form before he ordains them!  I wrote about that HERE.

The diocesan website has a donation page with a drop down menu.  Choose the St. JOSEPH Fund.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Liberals, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, Women Religious | Tagged , , , , , ,
39 Comments