A priest with something to say:
[wp_youtube]ptzi4ZrkiJE#![/wp_youtube]
“They have killed our temporal king. Now they want to kill heavenly king. Who is worth fighting for, and even dying for, if not Him?”
That is a line from the soon-to-be released film by Navis Pictures called The War of the Vendée. US HERE – UK HERE
I received a review DVD today and watched it this evening.
Given the professional beginning, with the good score, I was soon scratching my head at age inappropriate actors. They were far too young and, as young actors, they performed, well…. like young actors. I started to wonder how I could write positively about this film. My suspicion that I was missing something of critical importance drove me to the Navis Pictures website, which has as its goal the creation of a new genre of film: Children’s Cinema.
The some 250 young actors in this film are all under 21. This is, therefore, a direct contradiction to the old adage about never working with kids.
I don’t know how it escaped me, but I didn’t know about this aspect of the film before I stuck the DVD into the machine!
Navis, which means ship in Latin, like the Barque of Peter, wants to inspire young people to get into the film industry and other performing arts at a young age, presumably to begin to transform the industry from within. The director, Jim Morlino – yes, like the bishop but not too closely related he tells me – explains his project in a 3 minute video HERE. Great idea!
Once you give yourself over the fundamental point of this project, this genre, you look past the rough spots, and enjoy the production immensely.
I suspect this film will be inspiring to children, both because the story is historically important but also because it is by young people for young people.
The music score was very good. The composer, Kevin Kaska, was top notch (which is one of the reasons why I was puzzled at the beginning by the age of the actors). Kaska orchestrated the music for the Batman movie The Dark Knight, and the The Passion of the Christ. The War of the Vendée is Kaska’s second film as a composer.
If I ever get that three-hour a day call-in talk radio show, I will probably ask Navis for permission to use a clip from for my bumper music.
Of liturgical interest are portrayals of Holy Mass. I was outraged… outraged, I say, to see a maniple on the right arm of the young actor priest! Can you imagine? If people are going to make movies about the old days, why don’t they talk to someone who knows what’s what? And the Latin… mon Dieu! (I’m kidding, of course.) Later in the movie, for Mass before a battle, they get the maniple right… er left…
[UPDATE: I had a note from Jim Morlino of Navis Pictures who wrote: “RE the maniple – scene was originally shot with the correct placement of the maniple (I and many in the film are TLM folk) Due to an error on my part in maintaining “screen direction” for the Mass scene, I had to digitally “flop” the shot, and so, the Maniple appears to be on his right arm…when in fact it was correctly placed on his left arm the entire time. I knew that was going to raise some hackles, but there was nothing I could do about it.” No hackles from Fr. Z, Jim. I was yankin’ yer chain.]
The age of the actors sometimes made it difficult to know who was intended to be an adult and who was a child. The fact that these were kids, meant that they weren’t using real guns. They had to add effects, but they did a pretty good job. And there is a battle scene that turned out pretty well, along with a “follow the bullet” moment and the death of a good guy.
I loved the bad guy official of the Republic with the braces on his teeth.
Another point is the prominent positive role of the female characters. This is perhaps best captured in the line: “Men of the Vendée, either pick up your weapons now, or we will wield them for you!”
In the balance, the filmmaker and composer and these kids told a good story and they told it well. There were moments of humor, but serious things are presented throughout about Catholic identity, faithfulness, the role of men and of women in life, honor, and the virtue of religion.
It is timely that this film comes out even as governments are today attacking freedom of religion and the Catholic Church. I could well imagine a parish screening with a discussion period before and after, especially talking about contemporary attacks on the Church and our future choices.
We may need inspiration from the men and women of the Vendée again, and very soon.
Here is the trailer:
The disk has French and Spanish subtitles, director and cast commentary tracks, widescreen options and is regionless.
They are giving a 50% discount to customers in France!
And do they need it! This film comes at a time when we need that New Evangelization of which Pope Benedict has spoken.
It is good to see Catholic films being produced by and for young people. The War of the Vendée could introduce children (and their parents) to this important moment in our Catholic history. If there is sometimes a family playhouse feeling to the film, it also teaches about a dark time in our larger Catholic family history about which every Catholic should know. Thus, The War of the Vendée will clue a wider (and younger) audience into that period in France’s bloody history, just as There Be Dragons did to a certain extent about the Spanish Civil War, or Of Gods and Men did about the monks who were martyred in Algeria.
There is a moment in the movie which echos Navis’ “Children’s Cinema” purpose of the film.
A little boy playing a little boy, Remy, is not permitted to attend a meeting of adults (played by boys… it can get confusing). When Remy pouts, his sister (I think) remonstrates with him saying”
“Remy, don’t be so anxious to be older. Can’t you stay young just a little while longer?
“Being young’s no fun. Who wants to be a child?
“I know someone who wants everyone to be like a child. Someone who knows your name and who loves you so much He became a child Himself.”
[She gives little Remy a patch that the men wear. He says:]
“Now I’ll look just like papa when he was my age!”
The film, with its high production values, does indeed look like a grown up film.
I imagine that these kids had a blast making this movie. You and your children will enjoy watching it. They will probably want to be more Catholic.
Will we be as ready and the men and women of the Vendée?
They were willing to fight and even die for the honor of their Heavenly King and Holy Mother Church.
I initially posted on the story HERE. Lot’s of comments, including excellent canonical points from Dr. Peters.
As a follow up I posted HERE about can. 915 and the denial of Holy Communion to sinners.
As an update, there is an op-ed in the Washington Post from an official of the Archdiocese of Washington D.C. here.
The lefty-leaning MSNBC covers the story HERE. There is a video. They interview the woman by phone. The video will raise your blood pressure for sure.
I have now seen the letter of apology from the Archdiocese to the woman who was denied Communion HERE.

Also, Deacon Kandra has a good summary post on his blog HERE. Among the other things Rev. Mr. Kandra posted, he has this, with my emphases:
A reader from Maryland writes about the never-ending communion controversy there:
I just wanted to let you know that there is a lot more to this story than has been published. I was in a meeting with Fr Marcel [The priest in question] and heard the whole story. The woman in question brought her lesbian partner into the vesting sacristy just before the funeral Mass and made sure to introduce her partner to Fr Marcel, introducing her as her ‘lover’. He told her then that she should not present herself for Communion. I have been to many Masses said by Father Marcel and he is a good and holy priest. He speaks very softly when giving out Holy Communion, almost whispering “Corpus Christi” — and did not publicly denounce her but rather said in a whisper that he could not give her Holy Communion. He did feel sick at the end of Mass and made sure to have a replacement priest accompany the body and family to the cemetery.
Father Marcel has a very active role in the very public and weekly vigils at Carhart’s late term abortion clinic in Germantown. He has been a staunch and vociferous defender of life. It is my belief that this is a calculated attempt to discredit him. (Remember – same sex marriage will be signed into law this week in Maryland.) ‘Catholics for Equality’ and other gay groups are feeling pretty strong right now. Fr Marcel is their enemy because he speaks the truth and does not back down…
I am telling you all this because Fr Marcel cannot speak for himself right now. And because he at the very least deserves the benefit of the doubt from you and Ed Peters and others who do not know all the facts. Please use this information to bring some balance to the discussion. And please pray for our bishops who must defend their priests from these attacks!
[Kandra continues:] As I noted here, Barbara Johnson is telling a different version to the press of how the priest found out about her.
Did you get that last part? I think it is important.
It is so sad to watch the public lynching of the priest.
If a priest has sure and reliable knowledge that a person ought not receive Communion, is he not obliged to deny it? Tough call.
The great Canonical Defender, Dr. Ed Peters, might not have an open combox on his fine blog In The Light Of The Law, but he does have this interesting post about the denial of Holy Communion according to can. 915, vis a vis the story I posted the other day about the priest in the D.C. area who denied Communion to a woman at her mother’s funeral because he had been reliably informed that she was an active and unrepented lesbian.
With my emphases, take it away Dr. Peters:
A thought exercise occasioned by the lesbian/Communion controversy
March 1, 2012
Perhaps this thought exercise might help folks to think through the lesbian/Communion controversy better. Imagine we’re looking at the line of those approaching for holy Communion one Sunday morning at Mass.I see ten men approaching. One of them is dressed in Neo-Nazi gear. Quick, which one (in my view) is ineligible for holy Communion per c. 915? Would pretty much everyone there know why I turned him away?
I see ten people approaching. It’s Gay Pride Week and two of them are wearing Rainbow Sashes. Quick, which two (in my view) are ineligible for holy Communion per c. 915? Would pretty much everyone there know why I turned them away?
I see ten people approaching. One of them is Nancy Pelosi. Quick, which one (in my view) is ineligible for holy Communion per c. 915? Would pretty much everyone there know why I turned her away (even if they disagreed with my decision)?
Okay, now, I see ten women approaching. One of them is a lesbian. Quick, which one (according to some) is ineligible for holy Communion per c. 915? And how would anyone there know why I turned her away?
See the problem? Everyone knows what Neo-Nazis, and Rainbow Sashers, and Nancy Pelosi look like, but what does a lesbian look like?
Canon 915 (unlike Canon 916!) is about public consequences for public behavior. But “public” must be taken here as understood by canon law, and not necessarily as assumed from casual parlance.
Some evil conduct is so open, protracted, and well-known in the community (whether locally or nationally) that consequences at Communion time should (in a well-ordered body ecclesiastic) come as no surprise to the faith community. But other conduct, even though it is gravely wrong (one element of Canon 915) is not so open, protracted, or well-known (another element of Canon 915) so as to allow the community in question to understand what is happening to the individual in question.
If Nancy Pelosi is turned away from Communion, no one is going to wonder whether it is because she is, say, carrying on a torrid affair against her husband; if Rainbow Sashers are turned away from Communion, no one is going to suspect that, I dunno, they’ve embezzled money from their employers; and if a Neo-Nazi is turned away from Communion, no one is really going to wonder why. But if a some normal-looking woman in line for holy Communion is tuned away from the Sacrament, even politely, how are people supposed to know why? Did she kill maybe someone? Is she a porno queen or a prostitute? Maybe she runs that abortion clinic. Is she cheating on her husband or taking bribes at work? What?
Unless a substantial majority of the community in question (I assuming them to be adults, reasonably aware of Catholic life around them, etc.) knows at the time why a given individual is being denied holy Communion , that’s a pretty good sign that Canon 915 has not been satisfied, and that Canon 912 (and some others norms) has been violated.
Now, sure, over time, and under certain circumstances, any of the behaviors described above can become so well-known in the community that those involved in such activities should be denied holy Communion, provided the other elements of c. 915—like, say, “obstinacy”— are also satisfied.
A few years ago, Bp. Ricken made exactly this kind of determination about, in fact, two Catholic lesbians who had repeatedly proclaimed their aberrant lifestyle in the local media. He contacted them and told them they were not permitted to approach for holy Communion. He acted entirely appropriately, in accord with canon law (and sound sacramental theology), and his action won support from neutral observers. But, notice, his conduct was a far cry from a quick decision regarding ALL elements of c. 915 (not just one or two of them) made a few minutes before Mass one day.
And the fallout from the two cases has been night-and-day different.
At this point I have a question.
First, since the case that provoked this was not a Sunday Mass, but rather a funeral, and since funerals are generally attended by a much more closely knit group of people, and since it is likely that many of the “community” in that church for that funeral probably (that’s an assumption, I know) knew about this woman’s proclivities, could that adequate for considering denial? Most of the people at that particular funeral would have understood why the priest denied the woman communion. Iffy, I know.
UPDATE 2055 GMT:
The Washington Post has an essay about this issue written by an official of the Archdiocese of Washington DC, Fr.. William Byrne is Secretary for Pastoral Ministry and Social Concerns for the Archdiocese of Washington and pastor of St. Peter Church on Capitol Hill. This is about, of course, the denial of Communion to Ms. Johnson by a priest of that diocese.
In an effort to encourage Catholics to pray for religious freedom Saint Benedict Press and TAN Books are offering Saint Michael the Archangel prayer cards FREE to parishes while supplies last.
Please see press release for more details:
https://tanbooks.benedictpress.com/index.php/page/shop:prayercards
Hey New Yorkers, and anyone nearby, mark your calendar. The Catholic Artists Society will have an evening of recollection for artists and media professionals on Thursday, March 1st at 7pm at the Church of St. Vincent de Paul, 123 W. 23rd Street (between 6th and 7th Avenues) in New York City.
Father Gerald Murray, the parish’s pastor and outstanding priest and good friend of many years, will offer a meditation on themes related to the work and spiritual life of the artist. There will be opportunity for confession and silent adoration of the Blessed Sacrament, followed by Solemn Benediction and a reception afterwards.
An invitation with more details will follow soon.
Of special interest to artists – The Church of St. Vincent de Paul is an architectural gem, with a 19th century interior designed in the classical style by Henry Englebert, and a facade added by Anthony Depace in 1939. The interior boasts many beautiful works of art, including 10 Tiffany stained-glass windows. The church has a long connection with the city’s Francophone community, and was the venue for the 1952 marriage of Edith Piaf to Jacques Pills, in which Marlene Dietrich acted as matron of honor.
We have probably all seen an email or blog post with some funny but wrong answers kids have offered on tests. One of the most famous is this:

Recently was sent a few that I have not seen before, including this one.
This answer left the teach a bit concerned about the mother’s influence on her child.

As it turns out the child was drawing a picture of her mother with a snow shovel at her workplace Home Depot.
The moral of the story is that we should be careful about being too literal (as in the first example) and remember that appearance can be deceiving (as in the second).
This could also be an object lesson about how to apply canon law.
From a readerette:
Father,
Back before the new translation was implemented, I talked to my six year old son about the changes and what the new words meant. Since, then, it hasn’t come up again until today.
We were in the car and my kids were looking through their Holy Trinity Missals. My four year old daughter asked, “Mommy, did the Devil disobey God AND Jesus?” My son replied, “Yes, Bella, because Jesus is consubstantial with the Father. That means they’re the same!”
If a six year old can hear a word and definition and months later bring it up explaining it in his own words, I think most adults should be able to learn it as well.
Ex ore infantium…
“But Father! But Father!”, I can hear some readers saying. “That boy is a heretic! He said the Father and the Son are ‘the same’! ‘The same’! Get it? HERESY! He is a Sabellianist! Father, you should apply can. 915 now that he is proven to be a manifest heretic and – since all six year olds are by definition obstinate – deny him First Holy Communion!”
Let’s give the six-year old a pass on this one and assume that, in all good will, he meant what “consubstantial” conveys, okay? I am pretty sure that, in using “consubstantial”, he gets that the Father and the Son are ‘the same’ in the sense that they are both eternal God, of the same divine substance, etc., but they are different divine Persons and not just different modes of being God.
In any event, Junior were a Sabellianist, he would still have done better than many theologians, including any who might teach at a Jesuit university and who were dressed down by the USCCB’s committee on doctrine for opening the door to modalism when writing about the Trinity.
Since I regularly listen to Lauds sung by the Benedictine Monks at Norcia (and, I am glad to say, they may be correcting a tendency to go flat when singing psalms) I will happily from gratitude for what they do, and in reciprocity for what they give daily to me, advertise their new video about their way of life: Quaerere Deum… To Seek God.
From their Blog:
Eight years ago, our close friends, Tom Kolenberg and Eric Griffin, produced our first short video which gave a glimpse into our life. The video was an immediate success. But within a short time, we realized that a new video would be necessary which could illustrate the tremendous growth of the community and in a longer format, depict more aspects of our daily life.
Inspired by the full length documentary of Carthusian life, “Into Great Silence” we sought to produce a medium length film of high quality which would expose those far away from us to the inner workings of our life. Thus the idea of “Quaerere Deum” was born. The title comes from the first task of all monks, To Seek God, as described by the Rule of St Benedict
We especially want to thank Peter Hayden, brother of our Br. Evagrius, who gave of his time and talent to produce this wonderful film. May God continue to bless him and the work he does, as well as all of our friends who watch this video. Without further ado, we present to you “Quaerere Deum”.
[wp_youtube]djyjgbXwXUI[/wp_youtube]
If Pres. Obama has his way, this will coming to a neighborhood near you.
From the Beeb:
China to overhaul ‘threatening’ one-child slogans
By Viv Marsh
BBC NewsChina is to overhaul the sometimes threatening slogans used to enforce its one-child policy, the authorities have announced.
Details of the project were published in the Chinese communist party newspaper, the People’s Daily. [Which I believe also runs the New York Times.]
State media blamed local officials for coming up with phrases such as, “If you don’t get sterilised, your house will be demolished“. [So, it’s a little heavy-handed. James Carney would probably try to distant the White House from this one.]
They said they would be replaced by friendlier expressions. [Like… “Change!” and “Free Reproductive Services For All!” “It’s a Right!”]
But they insisted that the one-child policy itself would not change. [As a matter of fact, it will soon be tested in that country whose debt the Chinese own.]
The Chinese Communist Party has long appreciated the value of the concise, direct political slogan, but in matters of family planning, street banners and wall posters are frequently seen as lacking tactfulness and taste.
‘Kill your family‘ [It has the advantage of being brisk.]
Research by China’s National Population and Family Planning Commission, [Hey! Wait! Isn’t Pres. Obama’s science adviser John Holdren?] published in the People’s Daily, concluded that a quarter of slogans posted in furtherance of its policies had been crude and harsh in the past. It described some as spine-chilling.
Among the examples it cited were, “Kill all your family if you don’t follow the rule” and, “If you escape (sterilisation), we’ll hunt you down; if you want to hang yourself, we’ll give you the rope“. [Not as snappy, but … memorable!]
The research said milder expressions should be used to “avoid offending the public and stoking social tensions”. [Easier to sell that one in the US.]
For the past three decades, most Chinese couples in urban areas have been limited to having a single child.
Implementing the law has been hugely controversial, and has frequently involved sterilisation and even forced termination.
The one-child policy has also been blamed for causing a gender imbalance, with families eager to have male children and selectively aborting girls. [Remember! Reproductive services are your RIGHT!]
The People’s Daily said future propaganda would address this issue, and suggested the slogan: “Caring for the girl means caring for the future of the nation.” [Yahhhh…. that’s work.]
Upbeat slogans were also mooted to prevent birth defects. The paper said one new slogan would be: “Please get rid of the alcohol and cigarettes before you plan to be a father”.
A more friendly One Child Policy!
