The next frontier for homosexualists will be the legal age limit

Remember my post about The 2020 annual LCWR Assembly?  The assembly’s theme would be “Age: The Final Frontier“.

Now I read this in The Guardian: Paedophilia: bringing dark desires to light.

The article isn’t calling for laws to allow paedophiles to act on their impulses.  This is about reclassifying paedophilia so that paedophiles are not stigmatized.  This is the first step.  De-stigmatize the “orientation”.  When it becomes an “orientation” like every other “orientation”, then you confer “civil rights” on it.  Then you punish the Catholic Church for being against it.

This is disgusting, but it is something to watch out for.  The next frontier for the homosexualists will be the legal age limit.  Mark my words.

Won’t it be ironic when the last institution on Earth to oppose paedophilia is the Catholic Church?

Posted in Liberals, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
49 Comments

Is training in the Extraordinary Form forbidden at St. Mary’s College in Oscott, England?

I have been sitting on this for months, but…

As a preamble, let me repeat something.

The Supreme Pontiff’s 2007 Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum established juridically that the Roman Rite has two forms, not one.   Thus, if a man has not been trained in seminary to handle the Extraordinary Form, the Usus Antiquior, then he has not be properly formed before ordination.  A priest or deacon must know his Rite.

With that in mind, when a man is elevated to the diaconate or priesthood, someone must stand up and testify, publicly, during the rite, that the men are properly formed for the order to which they are to be ordained.

Damian Thompson at the Telegraph has now “gone loud” about something I heard about months ago.  I didn’t want to write about this, because I was concerned that some seminarians would be punished.  Now that it is out, let’s get out the whip of cords.

My emphases and comments:

Seminary visited by the Pope bans traditional Latin Mass

I really don’t want to have to go back to writing about how the Catholic Church in England and Wales is ignoring the Pope’s provision for the traditional Latin Mass, but… well, here we go again. [You would have thought this nonsense over by now.]

Seminarians at St Mary’s College, Oscott, in Birmingham recently asked the rector if they could have the Extraordinary Form celebrated there – note, they did not ask to be trained how to say it. [They should have asked to be trained.]
The answer? Essentially, get stuffed, but couched in genial and friendly language. Oscott, which trains priests [see above] from the Midlands and North of England, has decided that Summorum Pontificum – which requires that a group of the faithful have the old Mass celebrated for them if they make an appropriate request – does not apply within its walls. But seminarians are generously told that they can attend the EF elsewhere (like every other Catholic in the world).  [Keep in mind that seminarians, like most priests, have the right to a Christian burial, and that is about it.]
Some of the students are pretty disgusted by this ruling: not only does it go against the letter and spirit of Benedict XVI’s legislation, but the “House Notes” in which the news was broken also seem to play the trick of turning the request for the celebration of the Mass (which should be automatically granted) into one for special training in it (which is easier to turn down). Here’s the relevant section:

One final thing, I know it was raised at Dean’s Coffee about the availability of celebration of Mass in the Extraordinary Form. This was actually discussed in the Bishops/Staff Meeting last February. This is the advisory group of Bishops [Get that?] who meet with Archbishop Bernard and the Formation Staff once each year. The Bishops [Get that?] made it quite clear in February that the priority for Oscott, considering how much there is to fit into the curriculum should be to educate and train seminarians in the Ordinary Form so that they can celebrate it well and be able to draw out its full potential, including the use of the riches of our Latin liturgical tradition in music. They made it clear that the Extraordinary Form was not to be celebrated here but that seminarians were free, within the constraints of our timetable, to experience the Extraordinary Form where it is provided locally, both at home and here in the Archdiocese of Birmingham.

Sorry, but no “advisory group” has the authority to strike a red pen through bits of the Motu Proprio it doesn’t like. Does Mgr Mark Crisp, the rector, support this decision or has he been leant on by the bishops? How poignant that the Pope held his last event at Oscott at the end of his visit to Britain. That seminary has now become a no-go area for the Mass that he restored to the Church. Archbishop Bernard Longley of Birmingham should be ashamed of himself.

PS: I’ve just noticed, re-reading the document, that it says students are free “to experience” the EF – ie, it’s downgraded to “an experience”, like going to the zoo or the Planetarium.

There it is.

Universae Ecclesiae, the Instruction about Summorum Pontificum, says:

21. Ordinaries are asked to offer their clergy the possibility of acquiring adequate preparation for celebrations in the forma extraordinaria. This applies also to Seminaries, where future priests should be given proper formation, including study of Latin and, where pastoral needs suggest it, the opportunity to learn the forma extraordinaria of the Roman Rite.

The 1983 Code of Canon Law says that all seminarians must be very well trained in Latin. I am not making this up. The CIC can. 249 requires… it doesn’t suggest… it requires that all seminarians be very well-versed in Latin and also any other language useful for their ministry: “lingua latina bene calleant“. Not just calleant, but bene calleant. Calleo is “to be practised, to be wise by experience, to be skilful, versed in” or “to know by experience or practice, to know, have the knowledge of, understand”. We get the word “callused” from this verb. We develop calluses when we do something repeatedly. So, bene calleant is “let them be very well versed”. Let is also review Sacrosanctum Concilium 36 and Optatam totius 13!

How often does some fellow stand up in front of a bishop and say that the men to be ordained are properly trained even though they cannot say the Extraordinary Form and they don’t know any Latin?

 

Posted in Liberals, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill, The future and our choices, Universae Ecclesiae, Year of Faith | Tagged , , , , ,
38 Comments

Bitcoin?

Bitcoin… discuss.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes | Tagged
35 Comments

QUAERITUR: What is wrong with women being lectors?

From a readerette:

Thank you for your wonderful blog.

I have been reading lots of comments, and seen some criticism of women lectors. What is wrong with women being lectors?

I will open the floor to readers in a moment.

First, only men are instituted, “official” lectors. Women can only substitute for them in their absence. Thus, they are a permitted exception to the rule.

Second, the very idea of women entering the sanctuary to perform a liturgical role is a historical oddity.

Third, we need a deeper understanding of “active participation”.

Fourth, because the lectorate has always been a step to Holy Orders, women reading in the sanctuary can be seen by some as a step to the ordination of women to the priesthood.

I am sure others will have comments. I will now back out of the room… but not entirely.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , , ,
185 Comments

In case you were wondering…

… the episcopal motto chosen by the new Prefect of the Papal Household, His Excellency, George Gänswein. Titual Archbishop of Urbs Salvia, is …

Testimonium Perhibere Veritati.

This is from John 18:37:

Pilate therefore said to him: Art thou a king then? Jesus answered: Thou sayest that I am a king. For this was I born, and for this came I into the world; that I should give testimony to the truth. Every one that is of the truth, heareth my voice.

The presence of the term, veritas in the motto, harks to the episcopal motto of Joseph Ratzinger, Cooperatores Veritatis, 3 John 8:

We therefore ought to receive such: that we may be fellow helpers of the truth.

You will notice right away that the dexter side (the heraldic “right hand” is on the viewer’s left) of the stemma is the stemma of Benedict XVI, which seems appropriate, given that he was at his right-hand for some years.  Perhaps, given that his name is “Georg”, the other side is a reference to St. George who slew the dragon?  As an interesting aside, my family’s also has a blue background, a star in chief and a pointy weapon.  In my case there are crossed cross-bow bolts, but no critter.  The hat is green, because green is the color for bishops and archbishops.  The number of tassels is ten on each side, as befits an archbishop, as does the cross with two transverse bars.

So… there’s your trivia for the day.

Small gestures and signs have cumulative effects.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes | Tagged , , , , , , ,
20 Comments

Sunday Supper: More Hot Plate Adventures

For lunch today I thought of something Eastern, in honor of the Magi, but something not Chinese. Since I am working with a hot plate, I wanted to keep it simple.

Chicken Tikka Masala.

Start with boneless, skinless chicken thighs cut into small pieces.

20130106-133732.jpg
I happened to have a packet of simmering sauce.

20130106-133831.jpg

Add basmati rice.

20130106-133901.jpg

Cover and let it cook for a while.

I ate it with yogurt.

20130106-133952.jpg

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen | Tagged , ,
16 Comments

“During Pres. Obama’s third term…”

I have sometimes made a passing comment about what was going to happen to us during the third term of Pres. Obama.

The usual sort of person pooh-poohed that.  “But Father! But Father!”, they chortled, “You can’t be serious!  That’s against the the 22nd Amendment of the Constitution and… and… he’s … like, you know… a constitutional scholar!  Besides, how bad would that be?”

Pretty bad.

And truth is stranger than fiction, friends.

On gov.track you will find catholic Rep. Jose Serrano’s (D-NY 15) offering H.J.Res. 15: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

He has done this before, by the way.

Aside from the fact that resolution is abysmally stupid, it is also abysmally evil.

Liberals attain their goals through creeping incrementalism.

They introduce something.  It’s gets shouted down.  But they have bumped the needle a half point in their direction.  They introduce it again.  It’s gets shouted down again.  But they have again bumped the needle a half point in their direction. They introduce it again.  It’s gets shouted down again.  But they have again bumped the needle a half point in their direction. They introduce it again.  It’s gets shouted down again.  But they have again bumped the needle a half point in their direction…. until… one day it passes.

This is what they have done on a range of issues which you can name all by yourselves.

And catholic quislings collaborate.

 

 

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liberals, Pò sì jiù, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , ,
43 Comments

Benedict XVI: Bishops must be courageous, expect to be repeatedly beaten

But, inevitably, we will also be beaten by those who live lives opposed to the Gospel, and then we can be grateful for having been judged worthy to share in the passion of Christ.

This is what Pope Benedict said today, Epiphany 2013, in his sermon for a Mass during which he consecrated four new bishops.

Here is the sermon, with my emphases and comments.

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

For the Church which believes and prays, the Wise Men from the East who, guided by the star, made their way to the manger of Bethlehem, are only the beginning of a great procession which winds throughout history. [Keep in mind that, for Benedict, as he explained in his newest volume (US hardcover HERE.  Kindle HERE), the Magi or Wise Men are historical figures.  The Gospel are also historical documents.] Thus the liturgy reads the Gospel which relates the journey of the Wise Men, together with the magnificent prophetic visions of the sixtieth chapter of the Book of Isaiah and Psalm 71, which depict in bold imagery the pilgrimage of the peoples to Jerusalem. Like the shepherds, who as the first visitors to the newborn Child in the manger, embodied the poor of Israel and more generally those humble souls who live in deep interior closeness to Jesus, so the men from the East embody the world of the peoples, the Church of the Gentiles – the men and women who in every age set out on the way which leads to the Child of Bethlehem, to offer him homage as the Son of God and to bow down before him. [and so, I think, by implication, those who are not so humble!] The Church calls this feast “Epiphany” – the appearance of the Godhead. If we consider the fact that from the very beginning men and women of every place, of every continent, of all the different cultures, mentalities and lifestyles [“modi… di vita”], have been on the way to Christ, then we can truly say that this pilgrimage and this encounter with God in the form of a Child is an epiphany of God’s goodness and loving kindness for humanity (cf. Tit 3:4).

Following a tradition begun by Pope John Paul II, we celebrate the feast of the Epiphany of the Lord also as the day when episcopal ordination will be conferred on four priests who will now cooperate in different ways in the ministry of the Pope for the unity of the one Church of Jesus Christ in the multiplicity of the Particular Churches. [Even if they are now only titual.] The connection between this episcopal ordination and the theme of the pilgrimage of the peoples to Jesus Christ is evident. It is the task of the Bishop in this pilgrimage not merely to walk beside the others, but to go before them, showing the way. But in this liturgy I would like to reflect with you on a more concrete question. [classic Ratzinger] Based on the account of Matthew, we can gain a certain idea of what sort of men these were, who followed the sign of the star and set off to find that King who would establish not only for Israel but for all mankind a new kind of kingship. What kind of men were they? And we can also ask whether, despite the difference of times and tasks, we can glimpse in them something of what a Bishop is and how he is to carry out his task.

These men who set out towards the unknown were, in any event, men with a restless heart. [ENTER (stage right): St. Augustine] Men driven by a restless quest for God and the salvation of the world. They were filled with expectation, not satisfied with their secure income and their respectable place in society. They were looking for something greater. They were no doubt learned men, quite knowledgeable about the heavens and probably possessed of a fine philosophical formation. But they desired more than simply knowledge about things. [Can you hear the scientia and sapientia pairing behind this?] They wanted above all else to know what is essential. They wanted to know how we succeed in being human. And therefore they wanted to know if God exists, and where and how he exists. Whether he is concerned about us and how we can encounter him. Nor did they want just to know. They wanted to understand the truth about ourselves and about God and the world. Their outward pilgrimage was an expression of their inward journey, the inner pilgrimage of their hearts. They were men who sought God and were ultimately on the way towards him. They were seekers after God.  [Though visible signs, too.]

[QUAERITUR:] Here we come to the question: What sort of man must he be, upon whom hands are laid in episcopal ordination in the Church of Jesus Christ? We can say that he must above all be a man concerned for God, for only then will he also be truly concerned about men. [There is a hierarchy to our relationships, at which God is the summit.  If that relationship is disordered, all other relationships will be disordered, less than they ought to be.] Inversely, we could also say that a Bishop must be a man concerned for others, one who is concerned about what happens to them. He must be a man for others. But he can only truly be so if he is a man seized by God, if concern for God has also become for him concern for God’s creature who is man. [There is more to this than meets the eye.  Read that in the light of the Holy Father’s 2012 address to the Roman Curia in which he spoke about the problems that confront society today, including the problem of scrambled “gender”.] Like the Wise Men from the East, a Bishop must not be someone who merely does his job and is content with that. No, he must be gripped by God’s concern for men and women. [Not his own concern… or rather, he subordinates his concern and harmonizes it to God’s concern.  And what does God want for us? Salvation.] He must in some way think and feel with God. Human beings have an innate restlessness for God, but this restlessness is a participation in God’s own restlessness for us. Since God is concerned about us, he follows us even to the crib, even to the Cross. “Thou with weary steps hast sought me, crucified hast dearly bought me, may thy pains not be in vain”, the Church prays in the Dies Irae. [Again, classic Ratzinger.  Here he is at Epiphany and, after bringing in an Augustinian theme, he quotes the Dies Irae.] The restlessness of men for God and hence the restlessness of God for men must unsettle the Bishop. This is what we mean when we say that, above all else, the Bishop must be a man of faith. For faith is nothing less than being interiorly seized by God, [This is the fides qua, the gift.] something which guides us along the pathways of life. Faith draws us into a state of being seized by the restlessness of God and it makes us pilgrims who are on an inner journey towards the true King of the world and his promise of justice, truth and love. On this pilgrimage the Bishop must go ahead, he must be the guide pointing out to men and women the way to faith, hope and love.  [Augustine in his Confessions describes, according to ancient notions of gravity, how the heart strives to go to the place where it will be at rest.  That is why, away from God, the heart is restless.  Augustine says, amor meus pondus meum… my love is my weight.]

Faith’s inner pilgrimage towards God occurs above all in prayer. Saint Augustine [and there he is…] once said that prayer is ultimately nothing more than the realization and radicalization of our yearning for God. Instead of “yearning”, we could also translate the word as “restlessness” and say that prayer would detach us from our false security, from our being enclosed within material and visible realities, and would give us a restlessness for God and thus an openness to and concern for one another. The Bishop, as a pilgrim of God, must be above all a man of prayer. He must be in constant inner contact with God; his soul must be open wide to God. He must bring before God his own needs and the needs of others, as well as his joys and the joys of others, and thus in his own way establish contact between God and the world in communion with Christ, so that Christ’s light can shine in the world. [There is a liturgical implication for this.  Prayer which detaches us from our false security is, supremely, Holy Mass.  Holy Mass, celebrated properly, should detach us from our false security, leave us restless. It should, ideally, leave us unsettled to the point even of being filled with awe at transcendence, an awe that verges on the holy fear that is the beginning of wisdom (sapientia).  During Mass we should be brought through the outward signs and the spaces between the signs to encounter the mystery which is tremendum et fascinans.  Yes, should detach us from false security.  How can it not, if it is truly prayer?]

Let us return to the Wise Men from the East. These were also, and above all, men of courage, the courage and humility born of faith. Courage was needed to grasp the meaning of the star as a sign to set out, to go forth – towards the unknown, the uncertain, on paths filled with hidden dangers. We can imagine that their decision was met with derision: the scorn of those realists who could only mock the reveries of such men. [How many bishops today, courageous bishops who speak with clarity, are derided in the mainstream media?] Anyone who took off on the basis of such uncertain promises, risking everything, could only appear ridiculous. But for these men, inwardly seized by God, the way which he pointed out was more important than what other people thought. For them, seeking the truth meant more than the taunts of the world, so apparently clever.

How can we not think, in this context, of the task of a Bishop in our own time? The humility of faith, of sharing the faith of the Church of every age, will constantly be in conflict with the prevailing wisdom of those who cling to what seems certain. Anyone who lives and proclaims the faith of the Church is on many points out of step with the prevalent way of thinking, even in our own day. Today’s regnant agnosticism has its own dogmas and is extremely intolerant regarding anything that would question it and the criteria it employs. [You can say that again!] Therefore the courage to contradict the prevailing mindset is particularly urgent for a Bishop today. He must be courageous. And this courage or forcefulness does not consist in striking out or in acting aggressively, but rather in allowing oneself to be struck and to be steadfast before the principles of the prevalent way of thinking. The courage to stand firm in the truth is unavoidably demanded of those whom the Lord sends like sheep among wolves. “Those who fear the Lord will not be timid”, says the Book of Sirach (34:16). The fear of God frees us from the fear of men. It liberates.  [Remember the Holy Father’s first sermon as Bishop of Rome?  “My dear friends – at this moment I can only say: pray for me, that I may learn to love the Lord more and more. Pray for me, that I may learn to love his flock more and more – in other words, you, the holy Church, each one of you and all of you together. Pray for me, that I may not flee for fear of the wolves. Let us pray for one another, that the Lord will carry us and that we will learn to carry one another.”]

Here I am reminded of an episode at the very beginning of Christianity which Saint Luke recounts in the Acts of the Apostles. After the speech of Gamaliel, who advised against violence in dealing with the earliest community of believers in Jesus, the Sanhedrin summoned the Apostles and had them flogged. It then forbade them from preaching in the name of Jesus and set them free. Saint Luke continues: “As they left the council, they rejoiced that they were considered worthy to suffer dishonour for the name of Jesus. And every day… they did not cease to teach and proclaim Jesus as the Messiah” (Acts 5:40ff.). The successors of the Apostles must also expect to be repeatedly beaten, [!] by contemporary methods, if they continue to proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ in a way that can be heard and understood. Then they can rejoice that they have been considered worthy of suffering for him. Like the Apostles, we naturally want to convince people and in this sense to obtain their approval. Naturally, we are not provocative; on the contrary we invite all to enter into the joy of that truth which shows us the way. [On the other hand, the invitation is a provocation.] The approval of the prevailing wisdom, however, is not the criterion to which we submit. Our criterion is the Lord himself. If we defend his cause, we will constantly gain others to the way of the Gospel. But, inevitably, we will also be beaten by those who live lives opposed to the Gospel, and then we can be grateful for having been judged worthy to share in the passion of Christ.

The Wise Men followed the star, and thus came to Jesus, to the great Light which enlightens everyone coming into this world (cf. Jn 1:9). As pilgrims of faith, the Wise Men themselves became stars shining in the firmament of history and they show us the way. The saints are God’s true constellations, which light up the nights of this world, serving as our guides. [classic Ratzinger] Saint Paul, in his Letter to the Philippians, told his faithful that they must shine like stars in the world (cf. 2:15).

Dear friends, this holds true for us too. It holds true above all for you who are now to be ordained Bishops of the Church of Jesus Christ. If you live with Christ, bound to him anew in this sacrament, then you too will become wise men. Then you will become stars which go before men and women, pointing out to them the right path in life. All of us here are now praying for you, that the Lord may fill you with the light of faith and love. That that restlessness of God for man may seize you, so that all may experience his closeness and receive the gift of his joy. We are praying for you, that the Lord may always grant you the courage and humility of faith. We ask Mary, who showed to the Wise Men the new King of the world (cf. Mt 2:11), as a loving mother, to show Jesus Christ also to you and to help you to be guides along the way which leads to him. Amen.

Posted in Benedict XVI, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , , , , , , ,
28 Comments

Benedict XVI consecrates 4 new bishops… Roman vestments

Today the Holy Father consecrated four new bishops.

Roman vestments.

Pianeta by pianeta.

I’m just sayin’

Prayers for the new bishops.

More images from the video feed.

Nice to see that they have been bringing out some of the splendors of the papal sacristy.

The Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, His Eminence Marc Card. Ouellet (future pope?) makes the formal request that the four priests be raised to the “onus” of bishop.  The Holy Father responded “Libentissime“.

Litany of Saints

Consecratory prayer.

The new bishops get their gear: the book, the ring, the miter, the staff.

Then they are seated in a “cathedra”, because they are teachers.

When Pope Benedict and Bishop Gänswein exchanged greetings, the latter seemed rather moved.

Heading down to greet other bishops.

More about Gänswein’s stemma, HERE.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Benedict XVI, Brick by Brick |
24 Comments

QUAERITUR: Vegetarian wonders about Friday penance

From a reader:

Thank you so much for your tireless ministry!
I apologize if this question seems silly, but it’s been weighing on my mind for a while: I have been a vegetarian since I was about ten years old. When I stopped eating meat, it was partially because my mom is a vegetarian, and partially for “animal rights” issues.
Twelve years later, as I rediscover my faith (as a newly-traditional, cradle-hippy-novus-ordo Catholic, sometimes I feel as though I’m relearning everything!) I’m beginning to reconsider my vegetarianism.
I currently fast from something else (like chocolate) on fasting days, but it’s beginning to seem as though I’m missing out on a huge part of Traditional Catholic culture. Am I failing to use God’s gifts fully and prudently? Or am I just overthinking my hippy-dippy roots?

Yes, you may be “overthinking” this a little.

I don’t see the sense in starting to eat meat so that you can give up eating meat as a Friday penance.

If you are healthy and happy with your diet as it is, fine. You can substitute some other penance for abstinence from meat.   You could also perform corporal works of mercy.  You could, for example, do something that would please St. Leo the Great (+461). Leo preached to his Roman flock that, during fast times, they were to give not just from their excess, but from their necessities, and then give what they would have eaten to the poor.  Perhaps you could donate food or money or time to food shelf.

On the other hand, if you want to start eating meat, fine.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box |
18 Comments