New CDF Prefect on talks with the SSPX

From CNA:

Rome, Italy, Jul 24, 2012 / 04:00 am (CNA/EWTN News).

Although the new head of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is optimistic about reconciliation with the Society of St. Pius X, he says that the teachings of the Church – including the dogmatic content of the Second Vatican Council – will never be up for re-negotiation.  [I know this is a news report, but I think the SSPX would not reject the “dogmatic content” of Vatican II.]

“The purpose of dialogue is to overcome difficulties in the interpretation of the Second Vatican Council,” Archbishop Gerhard Ludwig Muller told CNA July 20, “but we cannot negotiate on revealed faith, that is impossible. An Ecumenical Council, according to the Catholic faith, is always the supreme teaching authority of the Church.”  [Well… of course.  But we have to see whether or not everything in every Council is of equal weight.]

[…]

In a July 19 statement, the society said it had “determined and approved the necessary conditions for an eventual canonical normalization” at its recent General Chapter, but added that it still rejected “all the novelties of the Second Vatican Council which remain tainted with errors” as well as “the reforms issued from it.”

The assertion that the authentic teachings of Vatican II formally contradict the tradition of the Church is false,” Archbishop Muller stated.  [Again, I don’t know the language (I am on a bit of a break, but you will surely dig everything up), but who would reject the “authentic” teachings?]

He added, however, that between various texts of the council there are “gradations[There it is!] of teaching authority. By way of an example, Archbishop Muller drew a comparison between the council’s document on social communications, “Inter Mirifica,” which carries “less weight” than “dogmatic declarations” like the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, “Lumen Gentium.”

“Whatever is dogmatic can never be negotiated,” [Is everything in the document, therefore, dogma?] he said, while still expressing hope that the members of the Society of Pius X “can overcome their difficulties, their ideological restrictions so that we can work together to proclaim Christ as the Light of the World.”

[…]

A key problem for Rome in recent discussions seems to be the perception that the Society of St. Pius X often speaks about errors in the conciliar texts themselves.

[…]

Posted in Brick by Brick, SSPX | Tagged , , ,
35 Comments

Card. Burke: Catholic colleges should require the required “mandate” for profs to teach

From the Cardinal Newman Society:

Cardinal Burke Says Theologians’ Mandatum Should Be Required by Colleges, Disclosed to Students

Theologians, Canonists Respond to Pope Benedict’s Call for Compliance

Manassas, Va. – Catholic families have a right to know which theology professors have the mandatum, and Catholic colleges and universities should require it as a condition for employment, [Do I hear an “Amen!”?] affirmed the Vatican’s chief judge Cardinal Raymond Burke in a new report prompted by recent concerns from Pope Benedict XVI.

Cardinal Burke and several bishops, canon law experts, and theologians discussed the mandatum with The Cardinal Newman Society in an online report published today at www.cardinalnewmansociety.org.

The report, titled “A Mandate for Fidelity,” follows upon a May 5th address by Pope Benedict to several American bishops during their ad limina visit to Rome. The Pope expressed concern that “much remains to be done” toward the renewal of Catholic identity in U.S. Catholic colleges and universities, “especially in such areas as compliance with the mandate laid down in Canon 812 for those who teach theological disciplines.[Can we have some compliance with can. 915?]

He cited “the confusion created by instances of apparent dissidence between some representatives of Catholic institutions and the Church’s pastoral leadership.”

Canon 812 of the Catholic Church’s canon law states, “Those who teach theological disciplines in any institutes of higher studies whatsoever must have a mandate from the competent ecclesiastical authority.”

As implemented by the U.S. bishops, a theology professor requests a “mandate” (commonly identified by the Latin mandatum) from the bishop presiding over the diocese where the theologian is employed. The professor commits, in writing, “to teach authentic Catholic doctrine and to refrain from putting forth as Catholic teaching anything contrary to the Church’s Magisterium,” according to U.S. guidelines.

But in the United States, many Catholic colleges and universities have not required theology professors to have the mandatum, or even to disclose to students and their families which professors have the bishop’s recognition. The 1990s saw vigorous opposition to the mandatum by some theologians and the Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities, but the controversy has since cooled down, largely because in practice the mandatum has not had much relevance to students and college leaders.

[…]

Be sure to read the rest there.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Benedict XVI, Brick by Brick, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
14 Comments

What is your good news?

Do you have some good news to share?

I, after a couple really nasty weeks, am getting together with a group of priests for an annual meeting.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
48 Comments

Sr Patricia Miller in op-ed canonizes St. Obama for his respect for religious liberty. No, really.

Joseph Goebbels advised that when telling lies, tell a big one and tell it often. Another approach is to jam so many distortions into so brief a space that they are too hard to refute in as short a period and in keeping with attention spans.

Here is an op-ed piece from – to our shame as Catholics – a woman religious, Sr Patricia Miller in the Des Moines Register.

She must have an interior landscape like Salvador Dali painting, since she wafts incense at Pres. Obama for his, and the HHS mandate’s respect for the religious liberty of Catholics. n the HHS mandate.

I’m mobile right now do I will post this as is:

[…]

I believe President Obama’s vision to advance the common good and provide justice for all is aligned with the values Catholics cherish.

In this election, it has been unseemly to see partisanship and ideology above our call to serve the needs of the elderly and poor. As a lifelong Catholic, I have dedicated my life to care of my fellow human beings and tending to the needs of the poor and vulnerable in line with the tenets of the Catholic Church. I believe in President Obama’s commitment to provide health care for all citizens.

As a nurse and health care administrator for many years, I can say unequivocally our old health care system that left so many people without care and uninsured needed to be reformed. Our emergency rooms were overcrowded with people seriously ill with no prior records, with costly tests, treatments and follow-up. We spend twice more than any country in the world on health care with fewer results. Forty-five million citizens were without health care. That has dropped to 30 million already.

With the Affordable Care Act, no one can be denied care. It is the first time in history that a national commitment has been made to provide adequate care for all our citizens. The act is based on the Christian values that every person has the right to health, and we are responsible for each other.

Therefore, it is inclusive, accessible, affordable and accountable. It is already benefiting millions by offering preventive care and allowing our young people to stay on their parents’ health insurance, eliminating lifetime limits on policies, prohibiting dropping people from coverage when they become very ill or receive extensive treatments.

The president is diligent in viewing the needs of all citizens. Iowa, in 2000, was one of the first states to require our insurance companies to cover contraception. The bishops requested that those whose beliefs were against contraception not pay for others who use them. President Obama obliged with a plan that persons not using contraceptives, because of their beliefs, would not have their insurance increased, but it was refused by the bishops.

Through all actions and laws, President Obama is not taking away our religious freedom as Catholics. He has always considered the value systems of the different religions and tries to accommodate as best possible.

The president has been a faithful and loyal partner for Catholics starting as a community organizer in Chicago working with Catholic parishes in poor neighborhoods. His salary was funded by a grant from a group of the Catholic Church.

He knows that local churches often do more good for a community than a government program ever can. The Obama administration has proven its support for Catholics worldwide in the increase of funds directed toward charities, education and volunteer services to lift the vulnerable communities at home and abroad.

I believe President Obama’s values to advance the common good and provide justice and opportunity for all Americans are aligned with those Catholics cherish. This is in stark contrast with Mitt Romney’s support of the Ryan budget, which he has praised for being “marvelous.” The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has assailed the Ryan budget, stating, “A just spending bill cannot rely on disproportionate cuts in essential services to the poor and vulnerable persons; it requires shared sacrifice by all.” That letter was led by Des Moines Bishop Richard Pates.

The Nuns on the Bus tour to highlight the devastating impact of the Ryan budget noted “it’s not who we are as a nation, it is not in keeping with who we are, and we must speak out against it.”

The Ryan budget, which was passed by House Republicans, is an affront to Catholic social teaching by gutting programs, targeting the homeless, housing, nutrition, Medicaid, and Medicare while granting even more tax cuts to the wealthiest among us. This comes as we just learned the number of Iowans receiving food stamps has increased 7 percent in the last year.

President Obama has stood up for the Christian principles of loving our neighbor, caring for the disadvantaged and promoting the common good. I have seen his faith leading him to restore economic fairness and an economy where hard work and responsibility pays off, if everyone does their fair share and plays by the rules, our country will be better off.

[…]

Surreal.

Have at.

Work together on this.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Blatteroons, Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Magisterium of Nuns, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, SESSIUNCULA, The Drill, Women Religious | Tagged , , ,
68 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes

Was there a good point from the sermon you heard for your Mass of Sunday obligation?

Share it!

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
38 Comments

Encouraging Extraordinary Form News

For your “Brick By Brick” file.

My old friend His Excellency Most Rev. Alexander Sample, Bishop by the Grace of God and the Apostolic See of Marquette in Michigan, recently ordained deacons and subdeacons for the Institute of Christ the King.

His Excellency has a Facebook page HERE.  The ICK has photos HERE.

Dressing the bishop…

The bishop dressed:

The bishop ordaining:

The bishop and friends:

Lot’s of photos over there.

Encouraging!

 

Posted in Brick by Brick, Mail from priests, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , ,
27 Comments

Mass for Benefactors

This morning I had the honor to remember at Mass a passel of benefactors, those who have sent donations and other useful things:

DH, KW, AN, WH, MK, TS, IH, Fr. LT, JB, AH, NH, C’OD, LS, EMcG, KA, AMcK, KB, AM, BB, AN, FN, JP, AS, BD, ML, WH, VW, VS, JD, JR, CG, NH, MF, EC MB, AS, MH, AR, JS, MS, MH, TP, MK, RQC, JB, HP, JEM, AH, TT, ML, AG, RW, DN, HE, CL, RB, HE, TB, LL, SS, AM, LT, LS, CO’C, ZA, MH, EMcG, JS, JB, WL, KB, BB, GMcI, LMF, LL, ER, AN, FN, JP, JB, AS, ML, MJC, VW, VS, JJ & JJ, KW, JR, CG, NH, PD

And, just before Mass this morning, MH for the Amazon gift cards and MMR for the garment bags (to protect vestments)!

You prayers are appreciated and I reciprocate with my own poor prayers and grateful remembrance at Mass.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on Mass for Benefactors

In Minnesota: Marriage Amendment Supporters Lead Among Likely Voters

At a conference not long ago, I learned that, in Minnesota, only 2% of those polled were undecided.  That means everything hinges on voter turn out.

Now this comes from KSTP:

SurveyUSA/KSTP Poll: Marriage Amendment Supporters Lead Among Likely Voters

A new SurveyUSA/KSTP poll shows supporters of the marriage amendment lead among likely voters as the issue heads to the ballot in November.

According to the poll, 52 percent of Minnesotans favor defining marriage as between one man and one woman.

Thirty-seven percent are against it and 11 percent are either not voting on the issue or not sure. [That’s not 2%, but it is low.  However: a non-vote counts as a no vote.]

Republicans favor the amendment by an overwhelming margin – 75 percent for the amendment to 12 percent against. Democrats oppose it by a smaller margin – 54 percent to 38 percent.

Watch our video above to see how independent voters side on the issue. [Go there to see that.]

Posted in Brick by Brick, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
3 Comments

Honorary Doctorate?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
58 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can diocesan priests use the Extraordinary Form Carmelite or Dominican or Cistercian Rite?

From a reader:

I recently read an article about a Carmelite priest who had to jump through all these hoops to get permission to celebrate the Carmelite rite Mass, but then the article pointed out later that, under Universae Ecclesiae 34, “The use of the liturgical books proper to the Religious Orders which were in effect in 1962 is permitted.”

My question is this: to whom is that permission granted? It would seem that the obvious answer is that only a religious may celebrate a religious rite, and even then only the rite of his religious order. But the reason I ask is because I am a diocesan priest and in my parish boundaries lies a Carmelite monastery of nuns. We are responsible for celebrating their Masses because the nearest Carmelite priest is far away and only comes once a month. Unlike many other Carmelite nuns, these ones are still fully habited and really do strive to live like nuns, and I imagine that they would enjoy experiencing the Carmelite rite Mass. I really doubt, however, that the Carmelite priest who comes once a month would be willing and able, and I so I wonder whether it would be possible for the diocesan clergy responsible for their regular spiritual care to celebrate that rite for them.

How generous of spirit you are, Father. I applaud you.

Firstly, you don’t say what sort of Carmelites they are. I don’t think the Discalced reform of the Carmelite Order used celebrated the Carmelite Rite. Part of that reform included the use of the Roman Rite by all houses of discalced nuns and friars.

Therefore, to give them their patrimony, your spiritual care of the sisters would involve saying Mass for them as St. John of the Cross did in the presence of St. Teresa of Avila – that is, in the Roman Rite in its Extraordinary Form.

Moreover, I doubt permission would be given to a diocesan priest to use a the Carmelite Rite or any other Rite of an Order. Those Rites are for members of the Orders. The normative text of Article 34 of Universae Ecclesiae reads, “Sodalibus Ordinum Religiosorum licet uti propriis libris liturgicis anno 1962 vigentibus.” That extends the use of the Religious Rites in effect in 1962 solely to “sodalibus“.

Back in the day, permission was not granted to diocesan priests to use the Rites of Orders, nor did members of Orders normally say the Roman Rite, except in rare cases. Thus, if a diocesan priest were visiting a Dominican parish he would have to have used the Roman Rite even if he were himself a Third Order Dominican.

However, priests can cross over, as it were, and act as lesser ministers in Solemn Masses.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
17 Comments