The arrant thief, giver of memories

The summers of my youth were intense rites of watching minor league ball games with my grandfather, bare-backed horses, swimming, crackling buzzing nights with chess pieces and a short-wave radio over the sound of distant trains.  Summers were given to running, brown and busy, with hardly a sense of time.

In the blazing summer of ’69 these my rites were interrupted.  I ceased scraping my knees for a few days and gave myself mind and imagination to the black and white console TV in my grandparents’ Montana living room.

During the earlier Gemini and Apollo missions I was a fanatic acolyte of NASA.  With each launch I rushed home from school to see what might be going on.  I slept on the couch with the TV on, deeply annoyed with simulations.  I knew the tag names of each spacecraft, the astronauts, what they did on the missions.  I built models of the Mercury and Gemini capsules. The Gemini capsule had little astronauts who could come out of their seats for space walks.  I used the precise term, of course: Extra-Vehicular Activity.

As the day of the big launch approached, I biked to a store across town on my green sting-ray with the taped over cracked white seat in search of a thing sublime.  At last I bought that big box, that grail, that model kit of the Apollo.

Apollo 11.

Within the Sacred Carton, barely to be balanced on the handle bars, there were arrayed in webs of parts and pieces the Command and Service Modules, a Lunar Module or “LEM” with retractable legs, and the housing for the same.  I worked and worked on that model.  I cut and trimmed and glued.  I painted and applied the decals.  I followed every rubric, intoned all the directions. No piece was excluded in impious haste.  I scrounged a map of the Moon, even a little Moon globe.  The secrets of why one side was dark were revealed. Why she waxed and waned were not hidden from me.  I knew where the Mar tranquillitatis was, and even what it was.

Columbia and Eagle.

Men were going to go to, orbit, land on, walk upon the surface of the Moon.

It was time empyrean.

When the actual landing took place, I was there.  During the walk there was no move, no shadowy lunar suggestion I didn’t see or crackle I didn’t strain for.

But true acolyte as I was, I was eventually impelled outside.  I had to see it happening, face to face.

It was July, hot, still.  The stars glittered and the Moon gazed back, silver white and gray.  Everywhere there echoed the same broadcast sounds.  The block synchronized with the same flashes and flickers from every living room.  No leaf moved in distraction … and it wasn’t science fiction.

Men were up there walking.

Forty years ago.

Shakespeare called our Moon an arrant thief.  Year in and year out she may snatch her pale fire from the sun, but in that young summer she bestowed on me bright memories.

It was an age – a closing age as it turns out – when browned kids ran free in their own games.  We dashed through yards and houses were not locked.  No sprinkler was unchallenged and every tree held out an invitation.

I remember my grandparents and that summer.  I remember a summer without sunscreen when it was still right to be just a boy.  I was nine, simply into everything, and men walked on the Moon.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Linking Back, Look! Up in the sky!, My Favorite Posts | Tagged , , , , ,
43 Comments

Contrasts

London is a town of amazing contrasts. For example, you will find ancient and modern together.

By now most people recognize "the pickle" shaped building which appears in all recent movies and TV shows based in London. Looking fora livelier area, I hopped on the tube for Holborn. I found to my delight a small Catholic church St Ambrose and St Cecilia I believe [correction: St Anselm and St Cecilia], which Exposition of the Blessed Sacrament in course. I spent a little while there before moving along into the busy streets.

Now a pint before moving along to find something to eat.

It is a bit strange to hear "American Pie" in a London pub.

… and some people singing along.

Posted in My View |
16 Comments

QUAERITUR: use of the traditional Rituale Romanum

From a seminarian:

I’m a seminarian and have a few questions regarding blessings. A newly ordained priest, who is a friend of mine recently started using blessings from the 1964 Collectio Rituum. For example, he uses the Blessing for Water and he does it all in English.

The Book of Blessings claims that the use of the book in English is mandatory (i.e. no other vernacular version may be used). Since I don’t have a Latin copy available for inspection I do not know if the Latin typical edition requires its use for blessings. Summorum Pontificum in Art 9 gives permission for the use of the older ritual and the circular letter form Bishop Trautman interprets it to mean the one in force in 1962 (in America that includes the 1961 Collectio Rituum). [NB: While I think that instinct is sound, I would need more convincing that local bishops are the authentic interpreters of papal documents.] However, he subsequently notes that this book is out of print and for that reason suggests the use of the 1964 Collectio. The 1961 Collectio was in accord with the 1959 permission granting the use of the vernacular in a limited way, while the 1964 makes provision for a far more substantial use of the vernacular.

My question is three fold:

1) Does the Latin typical edition of De Benedictionibus mandate the exclusive use of this book for the imparting of blessings?  [If is did, that is no longer relevant since Summorum Pontificum.  Priests may use – and I hope they will use – the Rituale RomanumDe Benedictionibus is, for the most part, dreadful.]

2) Summorum Pontificum references the use of the older ritual for the sacraments listed in Art. 9. How is this legitimately extended to the use of the blessings also contained in the older ritual[The rutale Romanum contains all the blessings.  Thus, all those blessings may be used.]

3) What should be the stance on the use of the vernacular, should the rubrics and permission in force in 1961 be used or is it permissible to use those suggested by Bishop Trautman in accordance with the 1964 edition.  [Good question.  I use Latin.  However, I believe the English in one of those approved editions may be used.  This is the case for the readings during Holy Mass in the older form according to Summorum Pontificum: vernacular readings may be used in an approved translation.  I don’t think anyone has taken that to mean a translation that was approved in 1962.  That also includes later approved translations.]

Thanks for your time. I very much enjoy your blog. Due to my status I would appreciate anonymity if you publish this email. [Always, for priests and seminarians if requested!]

I have said this before on other occasions.  The book De Benedictionibus is so awful that I hope one day soon it will be ash-canned.   This is also the opinion of some good liturgists I have known who have even held key positions.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , ,
35 Comments

QUAERITUR: Cassock for seminarian

From a reader:

I have a friend entering the seminary soon and we are looking to get him a cassock. I searched high and low for the post from sometime ago about where the best place to get a cassock is, to no avail. Would it be possible for you to send me a link to that post if you happen to be able to find it offhand? Or give me some advice on where to find a good cassock for a new seminarian?

 

I don’t really have a lot of time to dig this stuff up, and so I ask the help of readers.

Also, he didn’t specify what country he is in.

So… dear WDTPRSers… discuss… good sources of decent off the rack cassocks.

You might also check with John in Church Goods at Leaflet Missal Company, which has a site you can look up.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick |
29 Comments

Birmingham (AL-USA): TLM workshop for laypeople – 15 Aug

From a reader with my emphases and comments.

On behalf of Una Voce Northern Alabama, I am pleased to announce our first ever diocesan-wide workshop for the laity: "Introduction to the Extraordinary Form." This free, daylong workshop will take place on Saturday, August 15–the Feast of the Assumption of Our Lady, at the Cathedral of St. Paul in downtown Birmingham. Fr. Justin Nolan, FSSP, will offer conferences on the theology and ritual of the Ancient Form of the Roman Rite of the Mass. The highlight of the day will be Solemn High Mass in the Cathedral. Lunch will be provided directly following the Mass.

During the conferences, Fr. Nolan will answer many frequently asked questions regarding the basics of the Traditional Latin Mass, such as:

  • Why does the priest not face the people?
  • Why is the Mass in Latin?
  • How can I participate?
  • What is Summorum Pontificum?
  • What are Pope Benedict’s thoughts on the Extraordinary Form?

This event is free and open to the public–all are invited and no registration is required. However, we ask that you please RSVP online at www.unavocenorthernalabama.com to help us plan for the event. A nursery will be available if you wish to make use of it.

We have provided below a tentative schedule for the event and a flyer with all of the pertinent information. Please help us spread the word about this workshop by telling those who may be interested. Please contact us if you have any questions. We look forward to seeing you on August 15!

Ad Jesum per Mariam,

David Biddle, President
Una Voce Northern Alabama
Introduction to the Extraordinary Form
Tentative Schedule
*All events at the Cathedral Life Center except the Solemn High Mass, which is in the main church.

8:00am – Coffee and donuts
8:30am – First Conference: The Mass as Sacrifice
9:15am – Break
9:30am – Second Conference: Priest and Laity at Mass
10:15am –  Break / Confessions / Mass preparation
11:00am – Solemn High Mass
12:30pm – Lunch
1:00pm – Third Conference over Lunch: Latin and the Language of the Liturgy / Informal Q&A

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM |
14 Comments

QUAERITUR: English language for the Office

From a reader:

A priest friend of mind does not like the Grail Psalter translation. He tends to think the bishops saw the word, ‘Grail’ and thought ‘that would be good!’ but no. He doesn’t like the ‘Glory be to the Father’ becoming, ‘Glory to the Father’ without the ‘be’.

Is there an alternative prospect for my friend? What breviaries are American priests allowed to choose from?

I don’t think there is much of a choice, if you want to use English for the office.

Also, I don’t think that just because a priest is an American, he is restricted only to the "American" edition.

The present "American" edition is… well.. not great.   Some men chose to use the "English" edition, which I understand is noticeably better.  I can’t say anything about that, since I have never used it.  I have an "American" edition, but only use it when I am with other priests who want to say the hours together.

If one is opting to use the older office, I assume that the English in the bi-lingual 3 vol. edition of the Roman Breviary put out decades ago would suffice, though those volumes are like hen’s teeth now and very dear.

I am assuming that, because of Liturgiam authenticam, one day the whole thing will have to be redone.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM |
50 Comments

D. Fort Wayne-South Bend, Bp. D’Arcy’s norms for TABERNACLES

From a reader comes new from the Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend, where His Excellency the exemplary John M. D’Arcy is bishop. 

His Excellency has made a statement about the placement of the tabernacle in churches of the diocese. Document.

Here is the cover letter with his statement with my emphases and comments:

PROMULGATION OF DIOCESAN NORMS

June 14, 2009 Feast of Corpus Christi

To Priests, Deacons, Religious, and to All the Faithful,

The presence of Jesus Christ in the Blessed Sacrament is at the center of our faith and of the devotional life of our Catholic people.

In recent years, the place of the tabernacle in our churches has become a source of controversy. This should not be. The Eucharist, whether we are referring to its celebration or to the place of reservation, should always be a means of unity and communion, and never of division.

The place of the tabernacle in our church should reflect our faith in the real presence of Christ, and should always be guided by Church documents.

My experience is that our people, with their instinct of faith, have always desired that the tabernacle be central and visible. They find it confusing when the tabernacle in their churches is not visible, and if possible, central[Amen. Alleluia.]

Because of my responsibility to foster the devotional life of our people, and to keep it sound, I have asked our Office of Worship to prepare norms for the placement and design of the tabernacle in this diocese. These norms were brought before the Presbyteral Council, the Liturgical Commission, and the Environment and Arts Committee. Suitable refinements and improvements were prepared.

These norms are promulgated to the Diocese of Fort Wayne–South Bend on June 14, 2009, the Feast of Corpus Christi, the Body and Blood of the Lord. They will be effective on August 4, 2009, the Feast of Saint John Mary Vianney, the patron saint of priests, in whose honor the present Year for Priests has been dedicated by the Holy Father Benedict XVI.

I urge all priests to follow these norms carefully and completely, and most importantly – to foster devotion to the Blessed Sacrament.

With every best wish and prayer, I remain

Sincerely yours in our Lord,

Most Reverend John M. D’Arcy
Bishop of Fort Wayne – South Bend

 

"But Father! But Father!", surely you are by now eagerly shouting.  "Don’t leave us in suspense!  What does the bishop really say?"

Here are a couple highlights from the norms which you can read on your own.

4. In the Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend, the Bishop has judged that the tabernacle is normally to be prominently located in the sanctuary of the church, along the central axis behind the main altar. Under this arrangement, the tabernacle should be at an elevated, open location in the apse area, or in another central place in the sanctuary that is equally conspicuous. Where a high altar with a tabernacle remains in place, it is appropriate to continue using this noble structure for the reservation of the Blessed Sacrament.

5. This prescription is to be observed in all future construction or restoration projects involving places of sacred worship (including all churches, oratories, and private chapels) in the Diocese. Any exception to this norm must be approved by the Diocesan Bishop, and must clearly demonstrate itself as a worthy alternative that would accentuate the sacramental nature of the church building and contribute to the spiritual life of the worshiping community.

6. In those existing places of sacred worship where the tabernacle is currently located elsewhere in the sanctuary or the main body of the church, a liturgical consultation with the faithful and with the Diocese should begin, regarding the possibility of moving the tabernacle to a central position in the sanctuary. Especially if the tabernacle in a particular church was central at one time and then was moved, it should be returned to its original location.

24. Aside from tending to the tabernacle itself, we must ensure that the faithful receive proper guidance and formation with respect to reverence before the Blessed Sacrament. [Amen. Alleluia.  I would add RECEPTION as well… but that is not the topic of these norms.] Today there are many of all ages who inadvertently do not genuflect or bow in the correct situations.

Care should be taken to instruct the faithful that genuflection is the appropriate sign of adoration in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament, “whether reserved in the tabernacle or exposed for public adoration.” Before or after Mass, when the tabernacle is visible somewhere in the church, genuflection should be directed towards it. Although those who genuflect when a tabernacle is not present or when the Blessed Sacrament is clearly removed from the tabernacle (for example, during much of the Sacred Triduum) typically do so out of a commendable pious habit, they should instead bow out of reverence towards the altar.

25. Every church should strive to make the tabernacle accessible for prayer during the day, and to preserve a peaceful setting favorable to prayerful visits. Meetings and other activities without a strictly spiritual purpose should therefore be held elsewhere on the church premises whenever possible. Under extraordinary circumstances, such as if it became necessary for a church to host an event of a purely secular nature, the Blessed Sacrament may be removed from the tabernacle and transferred to the sacristy or another suitable place. The location should be secure, with the ciboria veiled and the Lord’s presence clearly marked.

WDTPRS sends huge kudos to Bp. D’Arcy for another good day’s work in the Lord’s vineyard.

Posted in Brick by Brick | Tagged , , , , ,
62 Comments

QUAERITUR ALIBI: Why isn’t Mary considered a priest?

Mark Shea in his blog, Catholic and Enjoying It, has a good Q&A:

A reader asks:

Why isn’t Mary [the Mother of God] considered the first priest since she actually brought Christ into this world?

Well, in a certain sense she is since she participates in the common priesthood of all the baptized [If she was baptized… hmmm…]. However, the short answer is: Because Christ did not ordain her to the sacerdotal priesthood.

In many respects Mary willingly participated in Christ’s perfect sacrificial self-offering in the greatest degree that any human could, and certainly greater than anyone else ever has.

But she was not chosen by Christ to be a priest in the way he chose the Apostles and their successors in the ministerial priesthood.

I do not recall any speculation in the Father about Mary having been baptized.

Her lot in the economy of salvation is privileged.  I don’t think we can easily speak of her as needing precisely what all of us need, for example, the baptism which forgives the guilt of original sin, the baptism which would make the Mother of the Church a member of the Church, the baptism which would make her who gave Christ his Body a member of the Body of Christ.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Linking Back |
43 Comments

Gotta love a saint named Swithun

Over at the well-written The Sensible Bond we find this on an interesting English Saint:

Today is traditionally the feast of St Swithun, bishop of Winchester. If people know anything about him, it tends to be the legend that associates his feast day with summer weather. Should it rain today, the legend states, it will rain for forty days. If it stays fine today, then it will supposedly stay fine for forty days. When Saint Swithun died in 862, his mortal remains were buried at his own request outside the old minster of Winchester. There his grave could be walked upon and there it lay open to the gentle elements; a bishop must be humble, even in death. In 971, however, after the construction of the new minster in Winchester they moved his body from the original grave and into the new church where a shrine was established until the Reformation (now re-established). Yet, that very night, a terrible rain storm began and it reportedly rained for forty days. This was said to be a sign of the saint’s wrath at his being moved.

 

Check out the post "Greatness in a handful of dust" for the rest!

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols |
19 Comments

QUAERITUR: Why in the TLM are Gospels mostly from Matthew?

A question from a priest friend, for some discussion.

A question from a confrère. Why does the 1962MR have scriptural readings that are mostly from Paul’s Epistles and Matthew’s Gospel?

 

I don’t know.

I suppose is makes sense that the reading generally called the Epistle be from letter, and most of those are by St. Paul.  I also suppose more reflection was given to those letters in the Church of Rome and areas where some Mass formularies were developed.

As far as the Gospel of Matthew is concerned….

Perhaps readers can help?

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
37 Comments