A reader sends a useful comment

I received this from a reader.  My emphases and comments:

I really enjoy your blog and have learned a lot in reading your posts; however, I’m going to stay away for Lent.

The comments are just too polarizing; the traditionalists and SSPX-ers/supporters, presume that every Novus Ordo Mass is a clown fest; those who attend liturgically improper Novus Ordo Mass and like it, are phobic about Latin long before they get to Extraordinary Form Mass and the presumed evils thereof. Neither side contemplates the possibility of a middle ground.

There’s also a bit of contentiousness between cradle Catholics and converts; as an adult Catholic who has yet to be confirmed, I fall somewhere in between. What I notice is that each group somehow feels superior to the other; while it may be true that cradle Catholics tell people they don’t or can’t understand things as converts, sometimes there is no substitute for experience. I have also encountered converts who think they have all the answers and are quick to correct others, even if they’re correcting someone whose statement was not wrong.

I am praying for Pope Benedict XVI, that he may have the strength to lead the church on its true course through these turbulent times. I’m not attached to any vision of how that will manifest but know he has a better shot of discerning God’s will than I.

This is a Friday in Lent.

I ask some of you who have been commenting here to get on your knees and give some considerations to what this reader offered.

Posted in The future and our choices |
Comments Off on A reader sends a useful comment

WDTPRS Friday after Ash Wednesday – Post communionem (2002MR)

WDTPRS Friday after Ash Wednesday – Post communionem (2002MR)

I am not sure about the origin of this prayer.  It seems to be comprised of prayers in ancient sacramentaries, such as the Gelasian and Veronese and the Hadrianum and Paduense manuscripts of the Gregorian.  I don’t think it was in the post-Tridentine editions of the Missale Romanum.

POST COMMUNIONEM:
Quaesumus, omnipotens Deus,
ut, huius participatione mysterii
a delictis omnibus expiati,
remediis tuae pietatis aptemur.

I note especially that the prayer speaks not in terms of participation in the "mysteries", but in the "mystery".  Mysterium in liturgical prayer can often be interchanged with sacramentum

The verb apto, which is in the Super oblata for the First Sunday of Lent, can have complicated theological overtones. In L&S you will see that it means “to fit, adapt, accommodate, apply, put on, adjust,” etc.  It is often used with the dative: to make apt or fit for something.  It is also “to prepare, get ready, furnish, put in order” and is constructed with the dative or ad.  Sometime the ablative is used to indicate that with which something is fitted, furnished, or provided.   Thus, since remediis could be either dative or ablative we might argue that ut… remediis … aptemur means either, “make us apt/suitable/ready to for the sacraments/mysteries” or “make us fit by means of these remedies/cures.”  You might want to say “worthy” or “properly disposed.”   Sometimes you will see apto with sacramentis

Expio is "to make satisfaction, amends, atonement for a crime or a criminal; to purify any thing defiled with crime; to atone for, to expiate, purge by sacrifice".

Pietas when applied to man means "dutifulness".  When applied to God it means "mercy".

LITERAL VERSION:
We beseech You, Almighty God,
that, having made satisfaction for all trespasses,
by the participation of this mystery,
we may be made properly disposed for the remedies of Your mercy
.

I am amused by the position of that comma: expiati, …. Perhaps some of you might have opinions.

We know that there was no punctuation in ancient times, but this isn’t really an ancient prayer.

Remember that every Holy Mass should be a participation in MYSTERY.  You will come and go and be in this mood or that.  But every Mass should at least an occasion for a meeting with mystery. If a Mass doesn’t offer you this, it has failed.

Posted in LENT, WDTPRS |
3 Comments

Blizzards and birds

Yesterday there was a bit of a blizzard here.

It came on in the late afternoon.  The wind was blowing hard enough that the chickadees were being blown off their perches.  They are quite the aeronauts, however.



As darkness came on, they were more and more covered with snow.

The snow drifted dramatically.

A guest for supper had nearly to crawl over the bank.

But by morning all traces were erased.

I rather enjoy a heavy snow storm with a good blow, for when the weather clears the next day, as it always seems to, the vista is lovely.

The birds are eating ravenously.  They are practically cleaning out the feeders in a day’s time.  Amazing.

Here are some siskins… tucking away.

Here is a redpoll.  The finches tend also to eat off the ground.

A noble chickadee comes in for a snack.

Here is a nice shot of a redpoll.  Click for a larger version.

This shot was a winner, I must say!

Your donations help.  Really.

Posted in My View |
23 Comments

What’s sauce for the goose-step…

I am reading stories that "the Vatican" has "rejected" Williamson’s recently issued apology.

Fr. Lombardi said:

…Williamson’s statement "does not seem to respect the conditions" set forth by the Vatican on February 4, when it ordered Williamson to "in an absolutely unequivocal and public way distance himself from his positions" regarding the Holocaust.

I don’t think that any apology SSPX Bp. Williamson may issue about his views on the Holocaust will ever be enough for certain groups, both of Jews and within the Church.  They may have crafted this in such a way that they know he will not do it.

But whatever else may happen with Bp. Williamson, will unambiguous apologies be required now from the more avid pro-abortion Catholic politicians?

If there are concerns that someone would deny that 6 million Jews were killed in WWII, and apologies are demanded from such a person, is there going to be equal concern over those who promote or participate in a far more extensive killing of the innocent?

Will Catholic pro-abortion politicians be required to issue apologies, as unambiguous as that which they require from Williamson… heck any apology at all…. for voting for abortion rights?

I’m just askin’

Posted in I'm just askin'... |
Comments Off on What’s sauce for the goose-step…

Blizzard

We are having a bit of a blizzard.

Supplies have been laid up.

I jarred some very spicy homemade mostarda last week for such an occasion.  I made a batch of oranges and lemons, and a batch of carrots, celery and fennel.  The second should be pretty aggressive!

Tonight a guest comes for a little beef roast and roasted veggies.

The birds are also laying up stores, despite the fierce wind and snow.

Here is a sturdy Chickadee.

Undaunted.

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen, My View |
18 Comments

QUAERITUR: difference between hand missals

From a reader:

I have a quick question if I may. Do you what the differences are, if any, between The New Missal for Every Day and The New Roman Missal by Fr. Lasance? I have the New Roman Missal, but know the other is out there as well. I was wondering if it is orth having both if the one I have currently is fine alone.

 
Quick to ask, not so quick to answer.

I will let the readers here chime in.

In the meantime, I am glad that you have your own hand missal.  They are treasures.

Some discussion of hand missals could be helpful.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
19 Comments

QUAERITUR: The Perfect Priest

I received the following e-mail:

Maybe this is a dumb question, but in a recent survey in our diocese, the priests stated that one of the most stressful problems for them were what the survey question called "expectations of the laity". Apparently, the stress is from either unreal expectations, or demands which seem impossible owing to a priest shortage.

However, one of the questions this raises is "Can the laity expect their priests to be holy, have courage and show leadership?" Are these unfair expectations? Just wondering what your opinion is of expectations from those of us in the pew.

People ought to have realistic expectations about their priests.

But think about the following:

There is an old adage that people get the priests they deserve.

Frankly, I hope we all get better than that!

People have the obligation to foster vocations and be positive about priests in their families with their children, and how the speak about priests and treat them. 

Sometimes I get the impression that many people think everything they want from the Church can be expected or demanded without reciprocal cost.

Ministry of priests included.

If people want their priest to be courageous, they can help him be so by being courageous in their vocations.  If they want him to be faithful, they must support faithfulness.  If they want him to be priestly, treat him as if he is a priest. 

Two things now pop into my head.

I am thinking of a sermon of Fr. Ronald Knox, I think for a first Mass, about expectations for priests and their own way of seeing their vocations as the years past.  He talks about the priest being, for example, during Holy Mass, a worker, just a priest saying Mass.  He gets about his work in a journeyman-like way. 

Perhaps some people think that the priest is supposed to levitate or shoot light from their eyes.  They should let him be a priest, not an angel.

Finally, I am reminded of an old chestnut about a chain letter:

The Perfect Priest

The results of a computerized survey indicate the perfect priest preaches exactly fifteen minutes. He condemns sins but never upsets anyone. He works from 8:00 AM until midnight and is also a janitor. He makes $50 a week, wears good clothes, buys good books, drives a good car, and gives about $50 weekly to the poor. He is 28 years old and has preached 30 years. He has a burning desire to work with teenagers and spends all of his time with senior citizens.

The perfect priest smiles all the time with a straight face because he has a sense of humor that keeps him seriously dedicated to his work. He makes 15 calls daily on parish families, shut-ins and the hospitalized, and is always in his office when needed.

If your priest does not measure up, simply send this letter to six other churches that are tired of their priest, too. Then bundle up your priest and send him to the church on the top of the list. In one week, you will receive 1,643 priests and one of them will be perfect. Have faith in this procedure.

One parish broke the chain and got its old priest back in less than three weeks.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
11 Comments

Way of the Cross by St. Alphonsus Liguori (voice and with chant)

For your Lenten spiritual warfare, here are two version of the Via Crucis, the Way or Stations of the Cross, by St. Alphonsus Liguori.

If people a truly impeded from going to a church, chapel or place where the Stations have been formally set up (which is a requirement for the indulgence to be gained) you can still gain an indulgence by spending at least a half hour in meditation on the Cross and death of the Lord.  This recording might be of help.

One version is plain, just my voice.  The other is the same voice recording, but with the Gregorian chant Sequence Stabat Mater interlaced between the stations.

  https://zuhlsdorf.computer/prayercazt/080314_stations_liguori_chant.mp3
https://zuhlsdorf.computer/prayercazt/080314_stations_liguori.mp3

I appreciate the support you have given to me and to WDTPRS. 

This is a token of my esteem.

UPDATE: The Way of the Cross – Joseph Ratzinger (Good Friday – 2005)

 

Posted in Classic Posts, LENT, PODCAzT, PRAYERCAzT: What Does The (Latin) Prayer Really Sound L |
16 Comments

QUAERITUR: ashes for infants

From a priest reader:

Dear Father Z.

The "mad dash" for ashes has begun here.  A question I have, that you  may know the answer to or at least have an opinion of, is, does it  make sense to impose ashes on infants or toddlers (ie –  those who do  not yet have an awareness of sin)?  Aren’t the ashes an exterior sign  that implies an interior desire for repentance? 

But, on the other  hand, is there any merit to imposing ashes on the very young for the  "teaching moment", or for the immersion into the Catholic heritage and  culture that it brings?

I know, there are several questions there.  Answer as many or few as  you wish.

You raise good points, Father.

Since this is a sacramental and not a sacrament, I think we can have some leeway.

You are right that, from the point of view of the sacramental and what it represents, there is little point to imposing ashes on an infant.

On the other hand, our Catholic identity is rooted in more than what we grasp from the light of reason.  Deep memories and emotions, implanted impressions, also play their role.

I have had several discussions with older converts who, entirely independently, make the observation that adult converts really aren’t quite "Catholic" until they have been a practicing for some 15-20 years.  It may be that it takes that long for things to sink in, settle in at the root of your mind, at your starting points of which you may not be consciously aware as you view the world and make decisions.

Hmmm… that was pretty good.  I am also reminded that some books are deeply Catholic, not because they deal with priests and stuff, but because of the world view in the book, which might remain unexpressed in an explicit way.

In that case, there is something to be said about imposing ashes on the very young, as you suggest.

Another practical point: It is worth doing it simply to avoid the ridiculous discussions you will have to have if you don’t.  Inevitably some anxious mom will be upset that junior didn’t get the ashes, especially because they are so cute with that smudge, etc. Who cares if it "means something".  No reason involved,… just emotion you can’t possibly address.

Though I am being a little facetious…. well… not too facetious really… there is another point to consider.

Ash Wednesday and Palm Sunday seem to be big days, especially because people "get something".  But not only that, they get to go forward to the rail (in traditional circumstances) and get something.  I have spoken with a number of folks who are unable to receive Holy Communion for one reason or another.  On a very deep level it is important for them to go forward to the rail, with everyone else, and receive them precisely what everyone else gets.  Even in those places where a blessing is given at Communion time, they still are getting the same thing as everyone else.

In any event, your question was good and its raises interesting points about the ineffable consequences of receiving ashes on Ash Wednesday.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Mail from priests |
38 Comments

WDTPRS: Ash Wednesday

Ash WednesdayToday’s Roman Station is Santa Sabina.

The Collect in the 2002 Missale Romanum, is an ancient prayer found in the Gelasian Sacramentary for the Vigil of Pentecost. It is also among the prayers for the 4th day of the 4th month, which more than likely involved the traditional fast of the fourth month (there were fasts in the 4th, 7th and 10th months).  This prayer is in the Veronese Sacramentary under the title In ieiunio quarti mensis

This prayer was in the 1962 Missale Romanum but at the end of the section for the blessing of and imposition of ashes, before the Introit of the Mass itself. 

Let’s see what the prayer really says.

COLLECT:
Concede nobis, Domine, praesidia militiae christianae
sanctis inchoare ieiuniis,
ut, contra spiritales nequitias pugnaturi,
continentiae muniamur auxiliis.

Praesidium has a powerfully military connotation.  It means fundamentally "defense, protection, help, aid, assistance" and thus it refers to "soldiers who are to serve as a guard".  Thus, by extension, it comes to mean "any place occupied by troops, as a hill, a camp, etc.; a post, station, entrenchment, fortification, camp".  Munio is equally military: "to build a wall around, to defend with a wall, to fortify, defend, protect, secure, put in a state of defense".  As you can imagine pugno, "to combat, give battle, engage, contend", is a military term.  Are you getting the picture?  Of course auxillium means "help, aid, assistance, support, succor", but when in the plural it is also "auxiliary troops, auxiliaries (mostly composed of allies and light-armed troops; hence opposed to the legions)".  Then there is militia, which is "military service, warfare, war" and also specifically in the genitive militiae "in military service, or on a campaign, in the field".  

LITERAL TRANSLATION:
Grant us, O Lord, to commence the defenses of the Christian field campaign by means of holy fasts,
so that, we who are about to do battle against spiritual negligences,
may be fortified by the support of continence.

This is a mighty prayer.   Several things come to mind. 

First, most of us when we were confirmed were reminded in some way that we are soldiers in this pilgrim Church.  We must be ready to suffer for the Faith. 

Militaristic imagery informs much of the history of Christian spirituality. 

Next, while we are soldiers we are on the march, pilgrim soldiers.  We are on campaign.  When the Roman legions were on the march, they would build a fortified camp when they halted.  They took no chances.  We are on the march in a vale of tears where anything and everything can happen to us and around us. 

Thirdly, when we make mistakes, the results can be deadly.  The word nequitia means "bad quality, badness" but that is because it is "bad moral quality, of all degrees, idleness, negligence, worthlessness, vileness".  It usually refers to a lack of attention that duty and prudence require, resulting in negative consequences.  Moreover, the virtue of continence is described with the same word used to describe the auxiliary troops that supported the legion’s regulars.  While it could simply refer to "abstinence", continence is the virtue which restrains the will from consenting to strong impulses of sexual desire.  So, this prayer could have a special focus. 

SUPER OBLATA:
Sacrificium quadragesimalis initii sollemniter immolamus,
te, Domine, deprecantes,
ut per paenitentiae caritatis labores
a noxiis voluptatibus temperemus,
et, a peccatis mundati,
ad celebrandam Filii tui passionem
mereamur esse devoti.

This prayer also has roots in the ancient Gelasian and the Gregorian Sacramentary.  Notice, however, how long, wordy it is.  Hardly in the style of the terse prayers of the Romans.

REALLY LITERAL VERSION:

Praying to You, O Lord,
we solemnly raise up the Sacrifice of the beginning of Lent,
so that through the exertions of the charity of penitence
we may abstain from harmful pleasures,
and, cleansed from sins,
we may be worthy to be dedicated
to celebrating the Passion of Your Son.

St. Leo the Great refers to the time of the Lenten fast as a sacramentum, preparing us for the mysterium of the dying and rising of the Lord.  

Here at the threshold of Lent, let us make our "Lenten start". In the sacrament of Penance, Christ will cleanse your slate and you may make a renewed beginning.

POST COMMUNION:
Percepta nobis, Domine,
praebeant sacramenta subsidium,
ut tibi grata sint nostra ieiunia,
et nobis proficiant ad medelam.

A VERSION:
May the sacramental mysteries which we have received, O Lord,
afford us help,
that our fasts may be pleasing to You,
and may be profitable for us unto a remedy.

I am delighted that in the 2002 Missale the tradition of the "Prayer over the people" was revived in Lent.  This is an important custom.

The origin of the Oratio super populum is quite complex and hard to pin down.  Turning to Fr. Joseph A. Jungmann’s monumental two volume The Mass of the Roman Rite: Its Origins and Development we find a history of this prayer at the beginning of the section concerning the close of the Mass (II, pp. 427ff).  Something Jungmann emphasizes that caught my attention is the fact that we are at a “frontier” moment, the threshold of the sacred precinct of the church and the world.  When properly formed we want the influence of our intimate contact with the divine to carry over into the outside world.  The use of this prayer is very ancient, found in both the Eastern liturgies of Syria and Egypt and in the West.  

Unlike the Postcommunio, the object of the prayer is not “us”.  Instead, the priest prayers for and over the people, not including himself as he does in the prayer after Communion. 

By the time of Pope Gregory the Great this was only in the Lenten season, probably because this is perceived to be a time of greater spiritual combat requiring more blessings.  Indeed it was extremely important for those who were not receiving Holy Communion, as was the case of those doing public penance before the Church, the ordo poenitentium.  

How important was this prayer to the Romans?  In 545, when Pope Vigilius (537-55) was conducting the station Mass at St. Cecilia in Trastevere, troops of the pro-Monophysite Byzantine Emperor Justinian arrived after Communion to take the Pope into custody and conduct him to Constantinople.  The people followed them to the ship and demanded “ut orationem ab eo acciperent… the they should receive the blessing prayer from him”.  The Pope recited it, the people said “Amen” and off went Vigilius who would return to Rome only after his death.

ORATIO SUPER POPULUM:
Super inclinantes se tuae maiestati, Deus,
spiritum compunctionis propitius effunde,
ut praemia paenitentibus repromissa
misericorditer consequi mereantur.

Who wants to take a crack at it?

As we begin our lenten observance, like a soldier on the march, on a mission from your great Captain, be sure you have your objectives clearly defined. Get clear in your head whatever strategies and tactics will win for you your prize. 

What will you want to gain from this Lent? 

Posted in LENT |
9 Comments