Catholic League on some Brits lecturing the Pope

From the Catholic League:

NOTED BRITS LECTURE POPE

More than 50 British notables have signed a letter in the Guardian newspaper criticizing the visit to the U.K. by Pope Benedict XVI. Responding is Catholic League president Bill Donohue:

The pope is accused of (a) opposing condoms and thereby increasing the spread of AIDS (b) promoting segregated education (c) opposing abortion (d) opposing equal rights for homosexuals, and (e) failing to address the abuse of young people in the Catholic Church. These accusations deserve a response.

No one who ever followed the teachings of the Catholic Church on sexuality ever got AIDS voluntarily, but many who rejected these teachings have. Having separate Catholic schools for girls and boys has been one of the great educational achievements in the past century, providing unparalleled upward mobility for the poor and non-whites. The Catholic Church has always stood for the equal dignity of all persons, independent of sexual preference, but it will never lower its standards by putting every conceivable sexual relationship on par with marriage. No institution today is doing more to check the sexual abuse of youngsters than the Catholic Church, having learned its lesson when many seminaries lowered their standards during the sexual revolution.

Philip Pullman, of "The Golden Compass" fame (our boycott of his atheism-for-kids film worked beautifully), signed the letter. A few months ago, he said, "I hope the wretched Catholic Church will vanish entirely." Atheist fanatic Richard Dawkins, known for charging that the Catholic Church is "the greatest force for evil in the world," signed it as well. Gay activist Peter Tatchell, an organizer of "Protest the Pope," has said, "Several of my friends—gay and straight, male and female—had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. None feel they were abused. All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy."

There you have it. The pope’s leading critics are imbued with hate and even associate with advocates of child rape. And they have the nerve to point fingers at the pontiff.

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged
21 Comments

QUAERITUR: Fragments – When does reverence become neurosis?

From a priest reader:

I’ve been a priest for ten years, and the celebration of the Holy Mass is still the high point of my day.
 
I’ve always been scrupulous about cleansing the sacred vessels after Holy Communion and the fragments of the Sacred Host on the paten.  I know that a Catholic is automatically excommunicated for throwing away the Sacred Species. I’m always afraid that if I don’t recheck and check again the paten after I’ve wiped it that I’ve missed a particle and that it will adhere to the pall when I put it over the paten and then be lost.  I’m also a little embarrassed about rechecking and checking the paten again "just in case."    When does reverence become neurosis, and when does excommunication actually come into play in the case of Eucharistic fragments? 

I don’t know when reverence becomes neurosis.  I know that I am very careful to make sure that my paten is clean, that I have scraped the corporal, that I have purified well the ciborium and chalice… and I move on.  If I see something that I think may be a fragment of a Host, I do something about it.  But then I don’t continue to look for things that may be there once I have done my best.

Also, you cannot incur the excommunication if you don’t commit the moral sin.  If you unintentionally miss a fragment, you have not done what is necessary to incur the censure.

It is good to have a solid discipline when dealing with purifying vessels and gathering the fragments, lest they be lost.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Mail from priests | Tagged ,
25 Comments

Jesus GOD!… Does it have to be like this?

hungerI cannot stand the UN.  The UN should go.

That said…  for the love of God.

I caught this, and this photo, in a CNN story. 

The UN can give us some stats, but their solutions are not the right solutions.

Why should such a thing be going on today.

Can you recite the corporal works of mercy?

When I am in Rome, with that collar on, I am the incessant target of beggars.  I give, in a measured way, what I can.  You learn.

When I go to NYC, at least when I am walking around on my own, I am the incessant target of beggars. 

I am proud of the friends I hang with.  They give before I do. 

I got off the subway the night before last and a guy hit me for money.  I went about 30 feet and went back saying I would buy him some food and, when he said yes, I went straight into the nearest food place.   He grabbed me by the sleeve suggesting a nearby Subway.  He explained that less bought more.  I placed the order.  He got the food and left.  I placed the same order once more and gave him the bag when I walked by him again at his spot.  He was already sharing his sandwich with another guy.  We have to pass it along.  We help others.

But… Jesus God! …  Jesus said that we would always have with us the poor.

Does it have to be this sort of poor?  That photo just breaks me heart.

The mystery of suffering is terrible.  It is always with us.

The Exaltation of the Cross is the only answer. 

The Cross of Jesus is the only way to cope with this.

We remove the Holy Cross of the Lord from our worship at our peril.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
52 Comments

Fr. Z’s 5 Rules of Engagement for Summorum Pontificum

Folks, remember that as of 14 September 2007 the provisions of Summorum Pontificum are in force.

The WDTPRS Rules are now in force too.

Fr. Z’s 5 Rules of Engagement now that the Motu Proprio is in force:

1) Rejoice because our liturgical life has been enriched, not because "we win".  Everyone wins when the Church’s life is enriched.  This is not a "zero sum game".

2) Do not strut.  Let us be gracious to those who have in the past not been gracious in regard to our "legitimate aspirations".

3) Show genuine Christian joy.  If you want to attract people to what gives you so much consolation and happiness, be inviting and be joyful.  Avoid the sourness some of the more traditional stamp have sadly worn for so long.

4) Be engaged in the whole life of your parishes, especially in works of mercy organized by the same.  If you want the whole Church to benefit from the use of the older liturgy, then you who are shaped by the older form of Mass should be of benefit to the whole Church in concrete terms.

5) If the document doesn’t say everything we might hope for, don’t bitch about it like a whiner.  Speak less of our rights and what we deserve, or what it ought to have been, as if we were our own little popes, and more about our gratitude, gratitude, gratitude for what God gives us.

Posted in SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM |
8 Comments

Thank you, Holy Father!

WDTPRS thanks Pope Benedict XVI for the great gift of Summorum Pontificum.

℣. Let us pray for Benedict, our Pope.
℟. May the Lord preserve him, and give him life, and make him blessed upon the earth, and deliver him not up to the will of his enemies.

Our Father,  Hail Mary.

O God, Shepherd and Ruler of all Thy faithful people, look mercifully upon Thy servant Benedict, whom Thou hast chosen as shepherd to preside over Thy Church. Grant him, we beseech Thee, that by his word and example, he may edify those over whom he hath charge, so that together with the flock committed to him, may he attain everlasting life. Through Christ our Lord. Amen.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
18 Comments

Fragment of the Holy Cross

An old reliquary given to me long ago with a sliver of the Cross of Our Lord.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
9 Comments

VORTEX REPORT: What IS that … portentous plant? That… growth?

Some time ago I was in Kansas City, MO, and I posted about …

Sometime after a frequent participant here posted the comment:

Somebody needs to determine the identity of the tree in the middle of . . . the VORTEX. Especially its Linnaean name. Surely that would be significant?

Mysteriously, on Google Earth, even though the photo is copyright 2010, the tree is a mere seedling. Look here:
View Larger Map

It’s leafed out, so the photo must have been taken in the late spring at the earliest . . . but it’s 1/3 or 1/4 of the size it is in Fr. Z’s photo. And the funnel-like shape is very mysterious . . . . . [one might even say “portentous”!]

[ cue creepy music here ]

Comment by AnAmericanMother

After deep consultation and many … many… mugs of Mystic Monk Coffee… we think we have assembled the necessary remotely … I repeat remotely control probe, powered with heavy fuel.

DATA REPORTS TO COME!

Posted in Global Killer Asteroid Questions, Lighter fare | Tagged
10 Comments

QUAERITUR: how to address a deacon?

From a reader:

What is the correct form of address for a religious who is a deacon?  The internal lore of the community is that one retains "Brother" but some of the younger brothers are insisting on "Deacon."  I have a general aversion to calling deacons "Deacon" and bishops "Bishop", mostly because I have an aversion to calling you "Priest Z".  [Thanks!] In any case, the National Director for the Permanent Diaconate is the source which people cite on this score, but that says explicitly in the introduction that it doesn’t bind religious.  So, do you have any ideas?  This is a not-terribly-important question as most religious deacons will only be so for a few months, but it’s a good thing to get straight.

 

There are different customs for addressing Bishops.

In the USA we say "Your Excellency".  In the UK we say "My Lord".  An Archbishop,  I believe, would in the UK be "Your Grace". 

In the USA we say to Deacons "Reverend Mister".  I think that is the same in the UK.  However, I recall once at a gathering in London I addressed a deacon as "Reverend Mister" and he immediately snapped "Reverend DOCTOR". He had a rather high opinion of his own degree. 

I abhor this bare address "Bishop" or "Deacon".  It lacks decorum.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
66 Comments

Orthodox Bishop to Anglicans: you are doomed if you don’t stop

Remember what Card. Dias told the assembled Anglican leadership at Lambeth in 2008.  He said that their course indicates they are heading towards "spiritual Alzheimer’s" and "ecclesial Parkinson’s"

Now here is another warning.

This comes by of His Hermeuticalness, Fr. Finigan.

Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk is Chairman of the Moscow Patriarchate’s Department for External Church Relations. Recently he gave an address to the Annual Nicean Club Dinner at Lambeth Palace in which he politely but firmly pointed out that the dialogue between the Orthodox Church and the Anglicans,

"is doomed to closure if the unrestrained liberalization of Christian values continues in many communities of the Anglican world."

He referred particularly to the impact on this dialogue of the proposed ordination of women Bishops:

We have studied the preparatory documents for the decision on female episcopate and were struck by the conviction expressed in them that even if the female episcopate were introduced, ecumenical contacts with the Roman Catholic and the Orthodox Churches would not come to an end. What made the authors of these documents so certain?

He also referred to the ordination in the USA of Jim Robertson, an openly homosexual Bishop, leading to the suspension of contact with the Episcopalian Church, and to the rupture of relations with the Church of Sweden in 2005 as a result of the ordination of the lesbian Eva Brunne as "Bishop" of Stockholm.

Metropolitan Hilarion rightly analysed the differences within Christianity as being between traditional Christians and Christians of a liberal trend. Significantly, he referred to a growing co-operation between the Orthodox and the Roman Catholic Church with the aim of restoring a Christian soul to Europe:

We are not alone in our concern for the preservation of Christian values. Liberal tendencies in Protestant and Anglican communities present a challenge to those Christians and churches that have remained faithful to Gospel principles in doctrine, church order and morality. Certainly, we seek and find allies in opposing the destruction of the very essence of Christianity. One of the major tasks in our inter-Christian work today is to unite the efforts of Christians for building a system of solidarity on the basis of Gospel morality in Europe and throughout the world. Our positions are shared by the Roman Catholic Church, with which we have held numerous meetings and conferences. Together we are considering the possibility of establishing an Orthodox-Catholic alliance in Europe for defending the traditional values of Christianity. The primary aim of this alliance would be to restore a Christian soul to Europe. We should be engaged in common defence of Christian values against secularism and relativism.

From a Catholic point of view, it could be said that the close relationship of the Orthodox Church with Anglicanism, a relationship whose history Metropolitan Hilarion recalled warmly, was perhaps partly inspired by a resistance to closer links with the Roman Catholic Church. Now that it is apparent that the Anglican Communion is wantonly abandoning much of what is recognised as traditional Christianity in both sacramental and moral matters, it is very much to be welcomed that the Orthodox Church is discovering that the Roman Catholic Church is a true ally on many central questions. We have much to learn from the Orthodox Church too, in the celebration of the Sacred Liturgy. Pope Benedict has helped that rapprochement significantly.

 

Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.

Posted in New Evangelization, Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged , , ,
34 Comments

An Alarming Development near… The Vortex

I was alarmed today to see an article in the National Catholic Fishwrap… Reporter  … wait for it and put down your freshly brewed Mystic Monk Coffee

… praising His Excellency Bp. Robert Finn of Kansas City-Joseph.

Alarming indeed.

I wondered: Did our recent foray to the very edge of The Vortex upset the delicate balance of ecclesial force vectors, thus either a) disturbing Bp. Finn or b) correcting the NCR?

Then I read the piece.

It is alarming… alarming, I repeat, to see Bp. Finn’s name in the same paragraph with Archbp. Hunthausen in the NCR.

The issue, more seriously, is about the building of a nuclear arms facility in the borders of Kansas City-St. Joseph and about which H.E. Bp. Finn has issued public comments.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged , ,
22 Comments