MartinMass and heading into rainy chilly windy London

I’ll be heading into town to meet a famous Catholic journalist for lunch.

If my energy holds, perhaps later in the evening someone might like to meet for a pint.

People may SMS me (don’t send MMS): 07501852559

If I decide for a specific place, I’ll post it, perhaps under this entry.

In the meantime… not… this won’t be about coffee for a change… here is an appropriate poem.

“Martinmass” by John Clare written on 11 Nov 1841.

‘Tis Martinmass from rig to rig
Ploughed fields and meadow lands are blea
In hedge and field each restless twig
Is dancing on the naked tree
Flags in the dykes are bleached and brown
Docks by its sides are dry and dead
All but the ivy-boughs are brown
Upon each leaning dotterel’s head

Crimsoned with awes the awthorns bend
O’er meadow-dykes and rising floods
The wild geese seek the reedy fen
And dark the storm comes o’er the woods
The crowds of lapwings load the air
With buzes of a thousand wings
There flocks of starnels too repair
When morning o’er the valley springs

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

QUAERITUR: How should seminarians make Mystic Monk Coffee?

QUAERITUR: How should seminarians make Mystic Monk Coffee?From a seminarian:

I’m a seminarian studying at a certain ____ seminary (guess). I
have begun the practice of drinking Mystic Monk coffee. I’m am curious about the means by which you brew your Mystic Monk coffee. I have a standard Black & Decker auto drip coffee maker, but I find that it makes terrible coffee. It’s never hot enough, and when I let it sit so that it becomes hot, it burns. What coffee maker/method would you recommend? As a frequent coffee drinker, this is quite a crucial
issue. After all, what else will get me out of bed in the morning?
It’s not like we have Lauds chanted in Latin!

Drip coffee is acceptable provided the heating element will heat the water sufficiently.  It should be just under the boiling point, say around 200° F.    And make sure your coffee is ground for a filter.  The coarseness of the grind makes a difference.  I don’t have any suggestions for a brand of coffee maker. For a drip, I have had better luck with Cuisinart than with B and D.  You can always do this manually, with a plastic filter folder and water heated on a stove.

I am sure readers have their own suggestions.

Burned coffee is among the most vile substances on the face of the earth and it is an affliction resulting from the sin of our first parents.  It is to be vilified.

I also use a French Press from time to time as well as a stove-top “moka” pot style “espresso” maker.  It isn’t espresso, but it is very sturdy.  I do not have a good espresso machine.

The rite of making coffee should involve some Latin, you know.  In the morning, I suggest chanting:

?. Noli diligere somnum ne te egestas opprimat aperi oculos tuos et saturare panibus.

If you have guests, they may respond:

?. Propter quod dicit surge qui dormis et exsurge a mortuis et inluminabit tibi Christus.

You may chant both yourself.

The coffee is then consumed (there may be a pause for the pouring, but from the pot directly into your WDTPRS mugs, and not from mug to mug).

If cream and sugar are to be added, the adding is completed at this time.

The coffee having been consumed, use your laptop – or desktop as an option, or a hand held mobile device as it is pastorally appropriate – and, thinking about the appropriate liturgical color for the day, order more Mystic Monk Coffee through Fr. Z’s link.

I hope that helps.

QUAERITUR: How should seminarians make Mystic Monk Coffee?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Mail from priests | Tagged
53 Comments

How to swing a thurible

Here is one way to do it:

(This video is no longer available.)

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
61 Comments

10 Nov: Leo the Great

In the newer Roman calendar this is the feast of Pope Saint Leo I, “the Great” (+461).  In the older, traditional calendar, his feast is 11 April.

You could perhaps pray to St. Leo that he will intercede with God to ask strength and courage for his successor in this difficult time. Oremus pro pontifice!10 Nov: Leo the Great

I have quite a few PODCAzTs dealing with him and his texts.  I notice that all of them are from some time ago.

061 08-05-17 Pope Leo I on a post-Pentecost weekday; Fr. Z rambles not quite aimlessly for a while
059 08-05-15 Leo the Great on Pentecost fasting; Benedict XVI’s sermon for Pentecost Sunday
053 08-03-31 Annunciation – St. Leo the Great; some voicemail Q&A
050 08-02-22 St. Leo the Great on Peter; Fr. Lang on the Cathedra of Peter
049 08-01-06 Leo the Great on Epiphany; Lefebvre compared to Athanasius; feedback
029 07-05-18 Leo’s mind blowing Ascension sermon; angels
027 07-05-16 Leo on the Ascension; a Collect; feedback
021 07-04-22 Leo the Great on Peter – Msgr. Schuler
020 07-04-19 Leo the Great and Benedict – Habemus Papam!
010 07-03-25 Leo the Great’s Letter 28 “ad Flavianum” – veiling statues – a “Tridentine” church in Rome
009 07-03-22 Leo on the Passion; Sobrino; confessions on Good Friday
008 07-03-20 Leo the Great on works of mercy in Lent

10 Nov: Leo the Great

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged
6 Comments

Responses from seminarians and priests to my post about the translation and Latin

Under another entry, I said that I would take some opinions from priests and seminarians about what they might do if the new, corrected English translation winds up not being very good.

If the translation is unsatisfactory, many of the young men being ordained will be happy to use more Latin.  People can use whatever translations they prefer.  That worked before.  It will work again.

Here are some responses.

[PUT “JUST USE LATIN RESPONSE” in the subject line and include your state in life.]

Posted in Linking Back |
3 Comments

A “SAY THE BLACK” request from seminarians

A "SAY THE BLACK" request from seminariansI had a note from some seminarians:

I and some fellow seminarians would like to order a polo shirt with the Say the Black Do the Red printed on it. We need the collared shirt to comply with dress code.

Dictum factum.

I added the shirt to the online store.

A "SAY THE BLACK" request from seminarians

I also added an iPhone 4 slip cover, a new item!

A "SAY THE BLACK" request from seminarians

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole |
4 Comments

About reported problems with the corrected English translation

You can’t imagine how many emails I have had regarding changes being made by (theoretically) the Congregation for Divine Worship to the new, corrected translation. That translation had been sent to Rome and had received an approval.

But, because Adam sinned and too many people are involved, there are now variations floating around. Confusion is building.  Gabble gabble gabble.  Blab blab blab.  This is one reason why I have been quiet.

People are reasonably curious about my opinion.  After all, I have been involved in the comparison of translations for as long as anyone out there.  Longer than most.

I have received a lot of material …too much to sift quickly, given the other things in life I really want to do.

Eventually I will address myself to this with some focus.

When I get to it, in my own time, I will do so in my own name.

If I find that I detest what is going on, I will do my best not to throw a nutty or allow a frothy squealing about it on this blog.

Until then, I can toss out some cold observations.

Some will say that regional conferences, not Rome, have the authority to prepare translations.  “The Council gave conferences the task! Wah wah wah!”

This is the same argument Bugnini pushed way back when he carried out his personal war on the Sacred Congregation for Rites (and lost), and which was echoed decades later by a certain bishop in the USCCB (and lost).

News: the Congregation, whose authority is from the Sovereign Pontiff, has the authority to make changes to the texts to whatever extent is deemed opportune by that Congregation so long as the Holy Father desires them to continue to do so.

If you are worked up about this, do please put on your big boy underwear, make yourself a nice cup of Mystic Monk Coffee, try the Jingle Bell Java, and reread Apostolos suos.

That said, if – quod Deus avertat – the Congregation makes a hash of the new translation, they will quite simply be a laughing stock.

And I welcome the folks from the Congregation reading this who are now paying much closer attention.

This is a fast communication age. Information now gets around the globe in less time than a Vatican mandarin can stir sugar into a demitasse.

For those of you in higher roles in the Roman Curia, there is something called “the I-N-T-E-R-N-E-T”.  To learn more about this “internet”, stop the first 19 year-old who walks by the big open door to the piazza out there and ask him to show you his phone. If he is busy, talk to your 10 year old niece.

If the Congregation itself – or those to whom work is farmed out – make a mess of the new translation, everyone whose opinion they care about behind closed doors will hold them in derision.

Think about it: Latin might be on the ropes, but even if only a half dozen people who read Latin as well as I do start comparing their versions to the crowbar of a “slavishly literal version”,  the Congregation will lose its moral capital.

That’s not all.

Eventually the names of everyone involved will come out.

There is plenty of derision available, by the way.  Consider.

This is no longer an age in which shoddy work goes unnoticed.  Do a hatchet job on the new translation and your deeply held ideological conviction about what the translation ought to have been apart from the norms will be but cold comfort when the blogosphere and journals are done with you.

Therefore, I gently suggest everyone try to do their very best.

Another thing.  People might begin to wonder which official in the Congregation would be in a place to coordinate the grunt work and, if necessary, ward off potential embarrassments… or not.  Is it possible that someone who believes he knows better has turned this into his own project without adequate consideration for the possible contributions of others?

If the English version is goofed up – not at all certain – imagine my grief were people simply to opt for Latin because English has been shown by ecclesiastical authority yet again not to be a liturgical language.

Don’t like the changes to the new translation?

Just say NO!  Just USE LATIN!

Consider the inexorable biological solution and shifting demographics among priests and seminarians in the wealthier English speaking world.  It is in the best interests of those for whom Latin and the older Mass are the stuff of nightmares to do a good job of the English Novus Ordo.

If the translation is unsatisfactory, many of the young men being ordained will be happy to use more Latin.  People can use whatever translations they prefer.  That worked before.  It will work again.

If seminarians and priests want to write their thoughts about that last claim, send them by email and I will sort them out with anonymity preserved. [PUT “JUST USE LATIN RESPONSE” in the subject line and identify your state in life.]

But those are my thoughts for the moment.

Posted in Random Thoughts, SESSIUNCULA, The Drill, The future and our choices, WDTPRS, Wherein Fr. Z Rants |
62 Comments

Going to town

Heading into central London.

I hope I don’t start a riot!

Meanwhile…

[CUE MUSIC]

Going to townWhen you have had a tough day of looking at paintings by Giotto and that lot and wondering if you are going to find someone with whom you might enjoy a pint, why not plan to refresh your coffee supply with Mystic Monk Coffee!

Those Italian Renaissance painters, with those characteristic almond-shaped eyes are sure to remind you that those mystic monks out there in Wyoming are just waiting for you to order some of those flavored coffees … which women seem to like more than men for reasons that are obvious.

Not that the mystic monks have an ALMOND flavored coffee mind you… and that might be where that segue didn’t quite work… but… theeeeeey… have…. lemme see…. ah!  Hazelnut! Which is just as good as almond, right?

Not only that, I received a note from them that they have revived for the season a blend they call… wait for it…

Jingle Bell Java!

Get it?

The description: “Limited time! Christmas spices with white chocolate and bourbon make up this delicious treat.”

Bourbon is so much more than just a great breakfast drink.

So, refresh your supply today or get some for the first time!

It’s swell!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
25 Comments

QUAERITUR: removal of 2nd Confiteor harmful to the faithful?

From a reader:

I am a lay Catholic and over the month past month I have felt truly
home since going to the Mass of the Ages.

Please forgive my ignorance but the missal of blessed John XXIII has
omitted the prayers at the foot of the altar at certain occasions and
the 2nd confiteor before reception of the Eucharist of the faithful.
Are these changes though indiscernible harmful to the faith or
necessary and part of the organic growth of the Mass?

The 1962 Missale Romanum (the Missal of John XXIII) did not omit the prayers at the foot of the altar, except in the normal circumstances (e.g., Good Friday).  And there is a curtailed form in the Requiem Mass.

However, the 1962MR does not have the 2nd Confiteor before Holy Communion.  In many places, I would guess most places, it is done anyway regardless.

I don’t think it is harmful to the faithful to omit the 2nd Confiteor.   It is not harmful to the faithful to be without the prayers at the foot of the altar.

At the same time, consider that these two elements of the older, traditional form of Mass were omitted in the Novus Ordo even though the Second Vatican Council’s document on liturgy Sacrosanctum Concilium said that no changes should be made unless it should be for the true good of the faithful.

I cannot quite make out how the faithful benefit from the removal of those things.  They might not necessarily be harmed, but… how do they benefit?

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
53 Comments

Pope Benedict speaks to Italian bishops about liturgy

The Holy Father sent a message to the Italian bishops through the intermediary of the President of the Italian Bishops Conference (CEI) in anticipation of a plenary meeting they will perpetrate in Assisi.

He begins the meat of his address by quoting Il Poeta, which was very satisfying.   My emphases and comments, translation by Zenit.

[…]

1. You have met these days in Assisi, the city in which “a sun was born to the world” (Dante, “Paradiso,” Canto XI), and who was proclaimed by the Venerable Pius XII as patron of Italy: St. Francis, who keeps intact his freshness and timeliness — the saints never have a sunset! — due to his having been conformed totally to Christ, of which he was a living icon.

As our own, the time in which St. Francis lived was also marked by profound cultural transformations, fostered by the birth of universities, by the growth of municipalities and by the spread of new religious experiences. [Benedict is painting that era in terms that should be familiar to us in ours.]

Precisely in that time, thanks to the work of Pope Innocent III — the one from whom the Poverello of Assisi obtained the first canonical recognition — the Church undertook a profound liturgical reformation. Eminent expression of this is the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), which counts among its fruits the “Breviary.” This book of prayer includes in itself the richness of theological reflection and of the praying experience of the previous millennium. Adopting it, St. Francis and his friars made their own the liturgical prayer of the Supreme Pontiff: In this way, the saint listened to and meditated assiduously on the Word of God, to make it his own and then transmit it in the prayers of which he was author, as in general in all his writings. [The Holy Father has been sending clear signals for us all to follow.  We too should make the Supreme Pontiff’s liturgical objectives our own.]

The Fourth Lateran Council itself, considering with particular attention the sacrament of the altar, inserted in the profession of faith the term “transubstantiation,” to affirm the presence of the real Christ in the Eucharistic sacrifice: “His Body and Blood are truly contained in the Sacrament of the altar, under the species of bread and wine, as the bread is transubstantiated into the Body and the wine into the Blood by the divine power” (DS, 802).

From attendance at Mass and reception with devotion of Holy Communion springs the evangelical life of St, Francis and his vocation to follow the way of the Crucified Christ: “The Lord — we read in the Testament of 1226 — gave me so much faith in the churches, which prayed simply thus and said: We adore you, Lord Jesus, in all the churches that are in the whole world and we bless you, because with your Holy Cross you have redeemed the world” (Franciscan Sources, No. 111). [Does that remind you of something?]

Found also in this experience is the great deference that he had toward priests and the instruction to the friars to respect them always and in every case, “because of the Most High Son of God I do not see anything else physically in this world, but his Most Holy Body and Blood which they alone consecrate and they alone administer to others” (Franciscan Sources, No. 113).  [Pope Benedict is deeply concerned for priests.  He gave us a Year for Priests.  He gave us Summorum Pontificum, which was clearly a gift for priests.  Perhaps he is suggesting to the bishops that they should value priests as well?]

Given this gift, dear brothers, what responsibility of life issues for each one of us! “Take care of your dignity, brother priests,” recommended Francis, “and be holy because He is holy” (Letter to the General Chapter and to all the friars, in Franciscan Sources, No. 220).  [NB:] Yes, the holiness of the Eucharist exacts that this mystery be celebrated and adored conscious of its greatness, importance and efficacy for Christian life, but it also calls for purity, coherence and holiness of life from each one of us, to be living witnesses of the unique Sacrifice of love of Christ.  [Note the connection of celebration of the “mystery” (mysterium = sacramentum) and identity.]

The saint of Assisi never ceased to contemplate how “the Lord of the universe, God and Son of God, humbled himself to the point of hiding himself, for our salvation, in the meager appearance of bread” (ibid., No. 221), and with vehemence he requested his friars: “I beg you, more than if I did so for myself, that when it is appropriate and you regard it as necessary, that you humbly implore priests to venerate above all the Most holy Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ and the holy names and words written of Him that consecrate the Body” (Letter to all the Custodians, in Franciscan Sources, No. 241).

2. The genuine believer, in every age, experiences in the liturgy the presence, the primacy and the work of God.  [Am I not forever harping about an “encounter with mystery”?] It is “veritatis splendor” (“Sacramentum Caritatis,” No. 35), nuptial event, foretaste of the new and definitive city and participation in it; it is link of creation and of redemption, open heaven above the earth of men, passage from the world to God; it is Easter, in the Cross and in the Resurrection of Jesus Christ; it is the soul of Christian life, called to follow, to reconciliation that moves to fraternal charity.

[We come to a concrete issue.  Note that when the Holy Father speaks to one group of bishops, he also speaks to others.  Surely what follows will also be important for the Anglophone world.] Dear brothers in the episcopate, your meeting puts at the center of the works of the Assembly the examination of the Italian translation of the third typical edition of the Roman Missal. The correspondence of the prayer of the Church (lex orandi) with the rule of the faith (lex credendi) molds the thought and the feelings of the Christian community, giving shape to the Church, Body of Christ and Temple of the Spirit. No human word can do without time, even when, as in the case of the liturgy, it constitutes a window that open beyond time. Hence, to give voice to a perennially valid reality calls for the wise balance of continuity and novelty, of tradition and actualization. [“actualization” here has to do with making things current, contemporary, apt for today’s exigencies.]

Pope Benedict speaks to Italian bishops about liturgyThe missal itself is placed within this process. Every true reformer, in fact, is obedient to faith: He does not move arbitrarily, nor does he arrogate to himself any discretion about the rite; he is not the owner but the guardian of the treasure instituted by the Lord and entrusted to us. The whole Church is present in every liturgy: To adhere to its form is the condition of the authenticity of what is celebrated.  [This is another way of saying “Say The Black – Do The Red”.]

3. May this reason drive you, in the changing conditions of the time, to make ever more transparent and practicable that same faith that dates back to the age of the nascent Church.  [continuity] It is a very urgent task in a culture that — as you yourselves say — knows the “eclipse of the sense of God and the obfuscation of the dimension of interiority, the uncertain formation of personal identity in a plural and fragmented context, the difficulties of dialogue between generations, the separation between intelligence and affectivity” (“Educare alla vita buona del Vangelo,” No. 9). These elements are the sign of a crisis of confidence in life, and influence in a considerable way the educational process, in which sure references become fleeting.

Contemporary man has invested much energy in the development of science and technology, attaining in these fields objectives that are undoubtedly significant and appreciable. This progress, however, has often taken place at the expense of the foundations of Christianity, in which is rooted the fecund history of the European Continent: the moral sphere has been confined to the subjective realm and God, when he is not denied, is nevertheless excluded from the public conscience. And yet, a person grows in the measure in which he experiences the good and learns to distinguish it from evil, beyond the calculation which considers only the consequences of an individual action or that uses as criterion of evaluation the possibility of carrying it out.

To change the direction a generic call to values is not sufficient, [I love that phrase: “a generic call to values is not sufficient”.  I have blasted away at this a few times.  It is very gratifying that the Pope states this so well.] or an educational proposal that is content with purely functional and fragmentary interventions. Necessary instead is a personal relationship of fidelity between active subjects, protagonists of the relationship, capable of taking sides and of putting into play their own liberty (cf. ibid., No. 26).  [You cannot have a personal relationship with a “value” or with a “educational proposal”.]

Because of this, most opportune is your decision to call for mobilization on educational responsibility all those who give importance to the city of men and the good of the new generations. This indispensable alliance cannot but begin from a new proximity to the family, which recognizes and supports its educational primacy: It is within it that the face of a people is molded.

As the Church that lives in Italy, attentive to interpreting what happens in depth in today’s world and, hence, to understanding man’s questions and desires, renew the commitment to work willingly to listen and to dialogue, making available to all the Good News of the paternal love of God. You are encouraged by the certainty that “Jesus Christ is the way that leads each one to a complete fulfillment of himself according to the plan of God. It is the truth, which reveals man to himself and guides him on the way of growth in liberty. It is life, because in it every man finds the ultimate meaning of his existence and of his action: full communion of love with God for eternity” (ibid., No. 19).

Pope Benedict speaks to Italian bishops about liturgy4. On this way, I exhort you to appreciate the liturgy as perennial source of education to the good life of the Gospel. The latter introduces to the encounter with Jesus Christ, who with words and deeds constantly builds the Church, forming her in the depths of listening, of fraternity and of mission. The rites speak through their intrinsic rationality and educate to a conscious, active and fruitful participation (cf. “Sacrosanctum Concilium,” No. 11).

Dear brothers, let us lift our heads and let us allow Christ to look into our eyes, the only Teacher, Redeemer from whom proceeds all our responsibility to the communities that have been entrusted to us and to every man. May Mary Most Holy, with a Mother’s heart, watch over our way and accompany us with her intercession.

On renewing my affectionate closeness and my fraternal encouragement, I impart to you, Venerable Brother, to the Bishops, to the collaborators and to all those present my heartfelt Apostolic Blessing.

In the Vatican, Nov. 4, 2010

BENEDICTUS PP. XVI

[Translation by ZENIT]

I think I would have given my right arm had the Holy Father written:

Dear Brothers in the Episcopate, exercise your oversight and energy in correcting liturgical abuses.  For those of you in the Latin Church, you have the additional treasure which is the Extraordinary Form.  Be generous in your participation in worship with the traditional rites of our Holy Church, for what was sacred then is still sacred now.

If the Holy Father needs a speech writer, I am available.

Posted in Brick by Brick, The Drill | Tagged
4 Comments