The Feeder Feed: DEATH FROM ABOVE edition

I was sitting at my desk, writing the entry about Fr. Finigan’s annd Fr. Blake’s comments on the Mass at Glasgow and ….

THWUMP!
I saw the birds at the feeders scattering.  Something large had hit the window next to my desk.

I figured it was one of the dopey Mourning Doves.

I stood up to see what happened and spotted a new visitor to the feeder… a different sort of feeder.

We stared at each other for a while.

Then he … she? … went into the bushes under my window to get, I suspect, the fallen prey.

I will go out later to see what it might have been, if anything is left.

I am thinking Broad-Winged Hawk.

UPDATE: 21:30 GMT


More than one of you have written to say that this is Accipiter striatus… Sharp-Shinned Hawk.

I am not so sure.  The tail is very like.

Anyone else?

I am still thinking Buteo platypterus Broad-Winged Hawk.

Posted in The Feeder Feed | Tagged
39 Comments

English priests comment on the Papal Mass in Glasgow

His Hermeneuticalness, Fr. Finigan and the great PP of Brighton, Fr. Blake, share their views of the Papal Mass in Glasgow today.

Be sure to visit their fine blogs.

Some comments from Fr. Finigan about the Mass today:

Liturgically, the Mass at Bellahouston Park was a mixed bag. It looked very much like the result of a tussle between the Papal celebrations team and the Scots new liturgy enthusiasts. There was some superb music and singing side by side with some that was so ghastly I took the headphones off until it finished. …
Visually, the sanctuary was disappointing. The throne, altar and lectern were made from fine materials, including marble, but managed to look pedestrian. This was particularly helped by the placing of three candles in boxes in a line either side of the altar. Whatever nuLiturgy expert managed to browbeat Mgr Marini into allowing that, instead of having some beautiful candleson the altar, should stick to school assemblies and creative liturgy prayer sessions for discussion groups.

One of the most striking positive elements was the reverent silence before Mass and at various points during the celebration. Under Pope Benedict we have learnt how to be quiet at the sacred liturgy where appropriate. I noticed this at the Mass for the Epiphany at St Peter’s in January and it seems to be something that the Holy Father takes on pilgrimage with him.

[…]

 

Some comments from Fr. Blake:

 

The announcer in a rather comperish style which seemed to break the prayerful mood announced Bishop Conti and  who welcomed the Pope rather nicely talking of the saints of Scotland. He was presented with a book on St Ninian and in return gave chalices to Bishop Conti and Cdl O’Brien.

The compere burst in again destroying prayerfulness by asking for it!

The Pope gave Holy Communion to people kneeling and on the tongue, I wonder if any bishop will follow his example, everyone else receives the Lord standing, there is not even a communion plate used. A man even received Communion from the Pope wearing a hat!!!

 

 

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , ,
13 Comments

Sounds from the Mass in Glasgow

Sounds from the Mass in Glasgow.

Also, a friend of mine is saying that Our Lord must have sent the Blessed Virgin and angels to clear the skies, given the demons that must be swirling around that Mass.

Moreover, I am told that the SKY TV has put the salient quotes from the Holy Father’s address before Her Majesty the Queen on the crawler at the bottom of their screen.  They have been running constantly the Pope’s words about "some who now seek to exclude religious belief from public discourse".

The Scots have set a high bar for the English.

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged ,
12 Comments

Benedict XVI’s sermon at Bellahouston Park, Glasgow

Holy Father’s sermon in Glasgow’s Bellahouston Park with my emphases and comments.

You will see here that the Pope is pressing something that I have for years been saying is at the heart of his pontificate: foster Catholic identity so that we can contribute in the public square.

Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,

"The Kingdom of God is very near to you!" (Lk 10:9). With these words of the Gospel we have just heard, I greet all of you with great affection in the Lord. Truly the Lord’s Kingdom is already in our midst! At this Eucharistic celebration in which the Church in Scotland gathers around the altar in union with the Successor of Peter, let us reaffirm our faith in Christ’s word and our hope – a hope which never disappoints – in his promises! I warmly greet Cardinal O’Brien and the Scottish Bishops; I thank in particular Archbishop Conti for his kind words of welcome on your behalf; and I express my deep gratitude for the work that the British and Scottish Governments and the Glasgow city fathers have done to make this occasion possible.

Today’s Gospel reminds us that Christ continues to send his disciples into the world in order to proclaim the coming of his Kingdom and to bring his peace into the world, beginning house by house, family by family, town by town. I have come as a herald of that peace to you, the spiritual children of Saint Andrew and to confirm you in the faith of Peter (cf. Lk 22:32). It is with some emotion that I address you, not far from the spot where my beloved predecessor Pope John Paul II celebrated Mass nearly thirty years ago with you and was welcomed by the largest crowd ever gathered in Scottish history.

Much has happened in Scotland and in the Church in this country since that historic visit. [That "pastoral" visit.] I note with great satisfaction how Pope John Paul’s call to you to walk hand in hand with your fellow Christians has led to greater trust and friendship with the members of the Church of Scotland, the Scottish Episcopal Church and others. Let me encourage you to continue to pray and work with them in building a brighter future for Scotland based upon our common Christian heritage. In today’s first reading we heard Saint Paul appeal to the Romans to acknowledge that, as members of Christ’s body, we belong to each other (cf. Rom 12:5) and to live in respect and mutual love. In that spirit I greet the ecumenical representatives who honour us by their presence. This year marks the 450th anniversary of the Reformation Parliament, but also the 100th anniversary of the World Missionary Conference in Edinburgh, which is widely acknowledged to mark the birth of the modern ecumenical movement. Let us give thanks to God for the promise which ecumenical understanding and cooperation represents for a united witness to the saving truth of God’s word in today’s rapidly changing society.

Among the differing gifts which Saint Paul lists for the building up of the Church is that of teaching (cf. Rom 12:7). The preaching of the Gospel has always been accompanied by concern for the word: the inspired word of God and the culture in which that word takes root and flourishes. [Word… and culture.   Word first.  The Word takes root in the culture and shapes that culture.] Here in Scotland, I think of the three medieval universities founded here by the popes, including that of Saint Andrews which is beginning to mark the 600th anniversary of its foundation. In the last 30 years and with the assistance of civil authorities, Scottish Catholic schools have taken up the challenge of providing an integral education to greater numbers of students, and this has helped young people not only along the path of spiritual and human growth, but also in entering the professions and public life. This is a sign of great hope for the Church, and I encourage the Catholic professionals, politicians and teachers of Scotland never to lose sight of their calling to use their talents and experience in the service of the faith, engaging contemporary Scottish culture at every level.

The evangelization of culture [Not just "evangelization", but "evangelization of culture".] is all the more important in our times, when a "dictatorship of relativism" threatens to obscure the unchanging truth about man’s nature, his destiny and his ultimate good.  There are some who now seek to exclude religious belief from public discourse, to privatize it or even to paint it as a threat to equality and liberty. [I hope the British Humanist Ass. is taking notes.] Yet religion is in fact a guarantee of authentic liberty and respect, leading us to look upon every person as a brother or sister. For this reason I appeal in particular to you, the lay faithful, in accordance with your baptismal calling and mission, not only to be examples of faith in public, but also to put the case for the promotion of faith’s wisdom and vision in the public forum. [Excellent.  Don’t allow your voice to be excluded from the public square.  Don’t be intimidated by the secularist and media.  Don’t wait for your ecclesiastical shepherds.  Do it.] Society today needs clear voices which propose our right to live, not in a jungle of self-destructive and arbitrary freedoms, [as humanists propose] but in a society which works for the true welfare ["true welfare"] of its citizens and offers them guidance and protection in the face of their weakness and fragility[Which includes protection of the unborn.] Do not be afraid to take up this service to your brothers and sisters, and to the future of your beloved nation.

Saint Ninian, whose feast we celebrate today, was himself unafraid to be a lone voice. In the footsteps of the disciples whom our Lord sent forth before him, Ninian was one of the very first Catholic missionaries to bring his fellow Britons the good news of Jesus Christ. His mission church in Galloway became a centre for the first evangelization of this country. [So, today is a stepping stone to a new evangelization.  (That’s "evangelisation" for my readers in Old Blighty.)] That work was later taken up by Saint Mungo, Glasgow’s own patron, and by other saints, the greatest of whom must include Saint Columba and Saint Margaret. Inspired by them, many men and women have laboured over many centuries to hand down the faith to you. [This is your patrimony!  Don’t let any one bully it away from you!] Strive to be worthy of this great tradition! Let the exhortation of Saint Paul in the first reading be your constant inspiration: "Do not lag in zeal, be ardent in spirit, serve the Lord. Rejoice in hope, be patient in suffering and persevere in prayer" (cf. Rom 12:11-12).

I would now like to address a special word to the bishops of Scotland. Dear brothers, let me encourage you in your pastoral leadership of the Catholics of Scotland. As you know, one of your first pastoral duties is to your priests (cf. Presbyterorum Ordinis, 7) and to their sanctification. [Benedict is especially interested in priests.  That is one reason why he gave them Summorum Pontificum.] As they are alter Christus to the Catholic community, so you are to them. Live to the full the charity that flows from Christ, in your brotherly ministry towards your priests, collaborating with them all, and in particular with those who have little contact with their fellow priests. Pray with them for vocations, that the Lord of the harvest will send labourers to his harvest (cf. Lk 10:2). Just as the Eucharist makes the Church, so the priesthood is central to the life of the Church. Engage yourselves personally in forming your priests as a body of men who inspire others to dedicate themselves completely to the service of Almighty God. Have a care also for your deacons, whose ministry of service is associated in a particular way with that of the order of bishops. Be a father and a guide in holiness for them, encouraging them to grow in knowledge and wisdom in carrying out the mission of herald to which they have been called.

Dear priests of Scotland, you are called to holiness and to serve God’s people by modelling your lives on the mystery of the Lord’s cross. Preach the Gospel with a pure heart and a clear conscience. Dedicate yourselves to God alone and you will become shining examples to young men of a holy, simple and joyful life: they, in their turn, will surely wish to join you in your single-minded service of God’s people. May the example of Saint John Ogilvie, dedicated, selfless and brave, inspire all of you. Similarly, let me encourage you, the monks, nuns and religious of Scotland to be a light on a hilltop, living an authentic Christian life of prayer and action that witnesses in a luminous way to the power of the Gospel.

Finally, I would like to say a word to you, my dear young Catholics of Scotland. I urge you to lead lives worthy of our Lord (cf. Eph 4:1) and of yourselves. There are many temptations placed before you every day – drugs, money, sex, pornography, alcohol – which the world [and the British Humanist Ass.] tells you will bring you happiness, yet these things are destructive and divisive. There is only one thing which lasts: the love of Jesus Christ personally for each one of you. Search for him, know him and love him, and he will set you free from slavery to the glittering but superficial existence frequently proposed by today’s society. Put aside what is worthless and learn of your own dignity as children of God. In today’s Gospel, Jesus asks us to pray for vocations: I pray that many of you will know and love Jesus Christ and, through that encounter, will dedicate yourselves completely to God, especially those of you who are called to the priesthood and religious life. This is the challenge the Lord gives to you today: the Church now belongs to you!

Dear friends, I express once more my joy at celebrating this Mass with you. I am happy to assure you of my prayers in the ancient language of your country: Sìth agus beannachd Dhe dhuibh uile; Dia bhi timcheall oirbh; agus gum beannaicheadh Dia Alba. God’s peace and blessing to you all; God surround you; and may God bless the people of Scotland!

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged
29 Comments

Thoughts on Benedict XVI’s state visit to England and Scotland

The Holy Father is about to travel to the "hedonistic wasteland … the geopolitical epicentre of the culture of death", and, judging from some of the nutty media coverage – Satan is irritated.

I think Satan particularly hates this visit to the the devil’s workshop in Europe.

As the Pope’s journey begins, here are a couple points I have been thinking about.

John Paul II’s visit was a pastoral visit.  He was the guest of the Church.

Benedict XVI is the guest of the Crown and government.  It is a state visit.

Newman is at last being beatified, the Anglican Communion is dissolving, Anglicanorum coetibus is out there, people are deciding where to worship based on new criteria.

It may be that after this trip we will not see another Pope travel to England.

I can’t help but think that this state visit brings a measure of closure some issues including those Henry VIII provoked. 

This state visit had to happen to close that rift symbolically, politically (if not religiously).  Will there be only four people and a dog to witness it?  So be it.  It will be done.  We prefer huge crowds, of course.  It may be that hordes will turn out.  They may not.  If they don’t, the Bishop of Rome still made a state visit, was received by the Queen, etc.

The Holy Father is also going to focus on something at the heart of pontificate: identity.  Pope Benedict, long before his election, has been concerned about the loss of the identity of Europe, the severing of its Christian roots.  Without that Christian component, Europe ceases to be Europe.  I believe he thinks the same must be said about England.

With those points in mind, I read in the UK’s best Catholic weekly, The Catholic Herald a story by Edward Pentin.

The Pope’s address in Westminster Hall is one of his most important ever

His address to the Queen will be equally historic, but it’s the one at the Palace of Westminster which will have a lasting impact

By Edward Pentin on Wednesday, 15 September 2010

Ask Vatican officials and others here in Rome which of Benedict XVI’s speeches will be the most important during the papal trip, and the answer is the one in Westminster Hall.

The Holy Father’s address to the Queen in Edinburgh will perhaps be equally historic, but it’s the one at the Palace of Westminster which is designed to have a lasting impact.

Freedom of conscience, faith and reason, and the positive contribution to society of the faith are the expected themes of the speech the Pope will deliver in the ancient chamber, perhaps most famous for being the place where St Thomas More was tried and condemned in 1535.

Westminster Hall has also been the site many other historical events, highly significant to British Catholics and to the nation as a whole. Originally constructed by William II (Rufus) in 1097, it was the venue for the coronation banquets of Henry VIII, Anne Boleyn, and Elizabeth I. Guy Fawkes and the Gunpowder Plot conspirators were tried there, as were Charles I and Sir William Wallace.

More recently, it was where Edward VII, George V, George VI, Queen Mary, Winston Churchill and Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother all lay in state. It is also reserved for the most important addresses: Charles de Gaulle delivered a speech in the Hall on a visit to Britain in 1960, and Nelson Mandela did so in 1996.

For the government, Westminster Hall will be a crucial event, but so too will be the working dinner at Lancaster House on the Friday, attended by officials although not the Holy Father. “It’s not the point of the visit, but they [the government] are very interested in this [dinner],” one Vatican official told me. Common issues of concern will be international development, the environment, disarmament, education, HIV/Aids care and interreligious dialogue.

In his speeches, Benedict XVI will also raise matters which might make political leaders wince, namely those relating to marriage, life and the family, but he will apparently do this in a “delicate way”.

Whatever happens, expectations are “very high”, according to the official who’s been involved in some of the visit’s preparation. “Everything is well prepared, and it will be a very special moment. True, there have been difficulties, some people are not so happy with the visit, but it’s very important that ordinary people recognise he’s not just going for Catholics but for everyone, and with an important message to transmit.”

He predicted that it will in fact be “better than expectations” and hoped that “prejudices will fall”.

It’s about the presence of the Pope,” he said, “and that changes everything.”

Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged
22 Comments

Benedict XVI’s state visit begins in Scotland

The Holy Father arrived in Scotland today and was greeted by Her Majesty the Queen at the beginning of this state visit.

ScotlandFrom VIS:

Your Majesty,

Thank you for your gracious invitation to make an official visit [not "pastoral" visit] to the United Kingdom and for your warm words of greeting on behalf of the British people. In thanking Your Majesty, allow me to extend my own greetings to all the people of the United Kingdom and to hold out a hand of friendship to each one.

It is a great pleasure for me to start my journey by saluting the members of the Royal Family, thanking in particular His Royal Highness the Duke of Edinburgh for his kind welcome to me at Edinburgh Airport. I express my gratitude to Your Majesty’s present and previous Governments and to all those who worked with them to make this occasion possible, including Lord Patten and former Secretary of State Murphy. I would also like to acknowledge with deep appreciation the work of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on the Holy See, which has contributed greatly to strengthening the friendly relations existing between the Holy See and the United Kingdom.

As I begin my visit to the United Kingdom in Scotland’s historic capital city, I greet in a special way First Minister Salmond and the representatives of the Scottish Parliament. Just like the Welsh and Northern Ireland Assemblies, may the Scottish Parliament grow to be an expression of the fine traditions and distinct culture of the Scots and strive to serve their best interests in a spirit of solidarity and concern for the common good.

The name of Holyroodhouse, Your Majesty’s official residence in Scotland, recalls the "Holy Cross" and points to [And I wonder if this isn’t going to be the theme Pope Benedict presses during the visit.] the deep Christian roots that are still present in every layer of British life. [The Holy Father’s pontificate is, in large part, about revitalizing Catholic identity, but also about recovering that which makes Europe Europe.] The monarchs of England and Scotland have been Christians from very early times and include outstanding saints like Edward the Confessor and Margaret of Scotland. As you know, many of them consciously exercised their sovereign duty in the light of the Gospel, and in this way shaped the nation for good at the deepest level. [The next thought is… lose that identity and society, at the deepest level, will suffer.] As a result, the Christian message has been an integral part of the language, thought and culture of the peoples of these islands for more than a thousand years. Your forefathers’ respect for truth and justice, for mercy and charity come to you from a faith that remains a mighty force for good in your kingdom, to the great benefit of Christians and non-Christians alike.

We find many examples of this force for good throughout Britain’s long history. Even in comparatively recent times, due to figures like William Wilberforce and David Livingstone, Britain intervened directly to stop the international slave trade. Inspired by faith, women like Florence Nightingale served the poor and the sick and set new standards in healthcare that were subsequently copied everywhere. John Henry Newman, whose beatification I will celebrate shortly, was one of many British Christians of his age whose goodness, eloquence and action were a credit to their countrymen and women. These, and many people like them, were inspired by a deep faith born and nurtured in these islands.  [Nice move to place Newman’s name along side those other names.]

Even in our own lifetime, we can recall how Britain and her leaders stood against a Nazi tyranny that wished to eradicate God from society and denied our common humanity to many, especially the Jews, who were thought unfit to live. I also recall the regime’s attitude to Christian pastors and religious who spoke the truth in love, opposed the Nazis and paid for that opposition with their lives. [Again…] As we reflect on the sobering lessons of the atheist extremism of the twentieth century, let us never forget how the exclusion of God, religion and virtue from public life leads ultimately to a truncated vision of man and of society and thus to a "reductive vision of the person and his destiny" (Caritas in Veritate, 29).

Sixty-five years ago, Britain played an essential role in forging the post-war international consensus which favoured the  establishment of the United Nations and ushered in a hitherto unknown period of peace and prosperity in Europe. [Not to mention the Marshall Plan… the US’s Marshall Plan, that is.] In more recent years, the international community has followed closely events in Northern Ireland which have led to the signing of the Good Friday Agreement and the devolution of powers to the Northern Ireland Assembly. Your Majesty’s Government and the Government of Ireland, together with the political, religious and civil leaders of Northern Ireland, have helped give birth to a peaceful resolution of the conflict there. I encourage everyone involved to continue to walk courageously together on the path marked out for them towards a just and lasting peace.

Looking abroad, the United Kingdom remains a key figure politically and economically on the international stage. Your Government and people are the shapers of ideas that still have an impact far beyond the British Isles. This places upon them a particular duty to act wisely for the common good. Similarly, because their opinions reach such a wide audience, the British media have a graver responsibility than most and a greater opportunity to promote the peace of nations, the integral development of peoples and the spread of authentic human rights. [with stress on the word "authentic".] May all Britons continue to live by the values of honesty, respect and fair-mindedness that have won them the esteem and admiration of many.

Today, the United Kingdom strives to be a modern and multicultural society. In this challenging enterprise, may it [Again…] always maintain its respect for those traditional values and cultural expressions that more aggressive forms of secularism no longer value or even tolerate. Let it not obscure the Christian foundation that underpins its freedoms; and may that patrimony, which has always served the nation well, constantly inform the example your Government and people set before the two billion members of the Commonwealth and the great family of English-speaking nations throughout the world.

May God bless Your Majesty and all the people of your realm. Thank you.

Among other things he proposes, implicit in the Holy Father’s sermon is also an argument that even aggressive humanists should look to England’s Christian roots with a positive eye, if nothing else but for utilitarian reasons.  That is, be careful.  If you undermine what you have been given, you won’t be left with anything.

Keep watching and listening for a theme in the Holy Father’s speeches: the Christian roots of England and Scotland must be preserved and fostered for without Christianity, they would not be who they are.

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged ,
13 Comments

The Guardian: Humanist letter against the Pope

The Guardian – in a spirit of helpfulness no doubt – printed a letter against the Pope and his state visit signed by some British notables. Well… they are a bit more notable now.  Most of them weren’t known by many people before, except perhaps fellow members of the British Humanist Association.

 

Harsh judgments on the pope and religion

The Guardian,  Wednesday 15 September 2010

We, the undersigned, share the view that Pope Ratzinger [In Italy this is not an uncommon way to refer to a Pope.  Everywhere else it could be tinged with insult.] should not be given the honour of a state visit to this country. We believe that the pope, as a citizen of Europe and the leader of a religion with many adherents in the UK, is of course free to enter and tour our country. However, as well as a religious leader, the pope is a head of state, and the state and organisation of which he is head has been responsible for:
Opposing the distribution of condoms and so increasing large families in poor countries and the spread of Aids.  [Among other things, they don’t help.]Promoting segregated education.  [Silly.]
Denying abortion to even the most vulnerable women.  [Abortion denies life itself to a vulnerable person, lots of them female.]
Opposing equal rights for lesbians, gay, bisexual and transgender people.  [Laws should reflect nature and God’s laws.]
Failing to address the many cases of abuse of children within its own organisation.  [I think it would be interesting to look at the careers of all the people who signed this and all the organizations they have started or worked for.]
The state of which the pope is head has also resisted signing many major human rights treaties and has formed its own treaties (“concordats”) with many states which negatively affect the human rights of citizens of those states.  [Gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.] In any case, we reject the masquerading of the Holy See as a state [The Holy See is a state.  It is not an act.] and the pope as a head of state as merely a convenient fiction [The Pope is a head of state.  These people apparently are detached from reality.] to amplify the international influence of the Vatican.  [The Vatican has been around for a while, and actually has influence.  Most of the undersigned are masquerading as… what… people other people have heard of, perhaps?  Let’s see about them:]

Stephen Fry, [homosexual humanist gameshow host with bipolar disorder who blamed the Poles for Auschwitz because they are Catholic, member of the British Humanist Assoc.] Professor Richard Dawkins [who thinks maybe aliens started all life, without dealing with who made the aliens, and member of the British Humanist Assoc.], Professor Susan Blackmore [seems to be a disciple of Dawkins into the paranormal as well as a member of the British Humanist Assoc.], Terry Pratchett [member of the British Humanist Assoc. and atheist fantasy writer], Philip Pullman [hates the Catholic Church and, btw, belongs to the member of the British Humanist Assoc.], Ed Byrne [comedian and yet another member of the British Humanist Assoc.], Baroness Blackstone [both a politician and an academic, two strikes, and member of the British Humanist Assoc., strike three], Ken Follett [novelist, atheist, member of the British Humanist Assoc.], Professor AC Grayling [philosopher, atheist, humanist member of the British Humanist Assoc.], Stewart Lee [member of the British Humanist Assoc., comedian, writer director of Jerry Springer – The Opera], Baroness Massey [member of All Party Parliamentary Humanist Group and former director of Family Planning Association and member of the British Humanist Assoc.], Claire Rayner [pres and v-pres of British Humanist Assoc. suggested killing the Pope], Adele Anderson [member of the British Humanist Assoc, actress], John Austin MP [member of the British Humanist Assoc.], Lord Avebury [Buddhist National Secular Society’s Secularist of the Year and member of the British Humanist Assoc.], Sian Berry [Green Party, and what do you know … member of the British Humanist Assoc.], Professor Simon Blackburn [philosopher VP of British Humanist Ass.], Sir David Blatherwick [yes, really… former diplomat and member of British Humanist Ass.], Sir Tom Blundell [biochemist member of, you guessed it, Brit. Hum. Ass.], Dr Helena Cronin [Darwinian and member of the Brit. Hum. Ass.], Dylan Evans [philosopher atheist and member of the Brit. Hum. Ass.], Hermione Eyre [an atheist member of the Brit. Hum. Ass. who seems not to have done much of anything], Lord Foulkes [politician], Professor Chris French [psychologist into the paranormal, member of the Brit. Hum. Ass.], Natalie Haynes [comedian member of the Brit. Hum. Ass.], Johann Hari [homosexual secularist], Jon Holmes [comedian member of the Brit. Hum. Ass.], Lord Hughes [member of Brit. Hum. Ass. and supporter of assisted suicide], Robin Ince [comedian member of Brit. Hum. Ass., author of “Carl Sagan Is My God…” ], Dr Michael Irwin [member of Brit. Hum. Ass. and promoter of euthanasia], Professor Steve Jones [geneticist and member of Brit. Hum. Ass.], Sir Harold Kroto [who thinks there are four four “religions”: humanism, atheism, amnesty-internationalism and humourism, member of Brit. Hum. Ass.], Professor John Lee [pathologist member of Brit. Hum. Ass.], Zoe Margolis [member of Brit. Hum. Ass. who seems not to have done anything except write about sex], Jonathan Meades [member of Brit. Hum. Ass., food writer], Sir Jonathan Miller [atheist member of Brit. Hum. Ass.], Diane Munday [promotes abortion, member of Brit. Hum. Ass.], Maryam Namazie [member of Brit. Hum. Ass., I like that she is against Sharia Law], David Nobbs [comedian, member of Brit. Hum. Ass., hates religion], Professor Richard Norman [member of Brit. Hum. Ass.], Lord O’Neill [member of the Brit. Hum. Ass.], Simon Price [member of Brit. Hum. Ass., wears hair in shape of horns and favors makeup and face hardware], Paul Rose [socialist, member of the Brit. Hum. Ass. ], Martin Rowson [cartoonist member of Brit. Hum. Ass.], Michael Rubenstein [member of Brit. Hum. Ass.], Joan Smith [atheist], Dr Harry Stopes-Roe [member of Brit. Hum. Ass.], Professor Raymond Tallis [member of Brit. Hum. Ass.], Lord Taverne [member of Brit. Hum. Ass.], Peter Tatchell [seems to be okay with sex with children (aka child rape)], Baroness Turner [member of Brit. Hum. Ass., hates Catholic schools], Professor Lord Wedderburn of Charlton QC FBA [member of Brit. Hum. Ass.], Ann Marie Waters [who knows], Professor Wolpert [biologist, member of Brit. Hum. Ass., doesn’t seem to have a first name], Jane Wynne Willson [Brit. Hum. Ass. member and accredited “celebrant” for humanist “religious” ceremonies]

Distinguished!

The Catholic League got into it.

And since a commentator (below) brought it up… not I

Annoy a British Humanist by drinking…

Mystic Monk Coffee!

And annoy them even more by ordering through my link.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
55 Comments

Benedict XVI to new bishops

The Holy Father recently addressed newly named and consecrated bishops during a workshop organized for them each year in Rome by the Congregation for Bishops.

The Holy Father had some good insights for these new bishops about what it means to be a bishop.

At the end of his address the Pope quoted a prayer of the English St.Aelred, Abbot of Rievaulx (+1147).

I can’t find the Latin online, and I don’t have PL 195 (I hope a seminarian or a priest at a seminary will dig this up and send it me by email… even digital photos of the pages).  Here is a fast translation from the Italian text quoted by the Pope:

"You, sweet Lord, have placed one such as me at the head of your family, of the sheep of your sheepfold (…) so that your mercy could be manifested and your wisdom revealed.  It pleased your benevolence to govern well your family through such a man, in such a way that the sublimity of your power would be seen, not that of man, in such a way that the wise man would not have anything of his own wisdom to vaunt in, nor the just man in his own justice, nor the strong man in his own strength: since when these men govern your people well, you it is who is ruling, and not them.  And therefore not unto us, Lord, not unto us, but unto Your name give glory." (Speculum caritatis, PL 195).

He also recommended St. Pope Gregory I, "the Great" and his Liber regulae pastoralis and made, I think, a rapid allusion to St. Augustine’s famous: Nos episcopi sumus, sed vobiscum Christianus sumus.  … We are bishops, but with you Christians. (Dolbeau 10D = 162C, 2.), or else "Christiani sumus propter nos, clerici et episcopi non nisi propter uos… We are Christians for ourselves, clerics and bishops for no one but you." (s. 301A), or perhaps most famously, "Vobis enim sum episcopus, vobiscum sum Christianus.  Illud est nomen suscepti officii, hoc gratiae; illud periculi est, hoc salutis.  … I am a bishop for you, with you I am a Christian.  The former is the name of the office undertaken, the latter the name of a grace; the former means danger, the later salvation" (s. 340.1). 

In this last citation, a sermon preached on the anniversary of his ordination, Augustine speaks of the burden of being a bishop, describing it as a sarcina, the heavy backpack of the Roman soldier.  He describes himself as being in the midst of the sea, tossed by a tempest, but in remembering redemption through the Blood of the Lord with the serenity of being safe in port.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged , , ,
6 Comments

The Feeder Feed

It has been a while since I have posted any shots from the feeder.Twitter

A whole bunch o’ Blue Jays.  There were a couple more as well.

This Nutchatch likes safflower.

I was surprised today to spot a Rose-breasted Grosbeak.  I thought they were gone.

Posted in The Feeder Feed |
5 Comments

QUAERITUR: Jews using a Catholic church for their services

From a reader:

EWTN is reporting that a priest at St. Louis parish in Austin is allowing a Jewish group to use his parish for Jewish holy day celebrations.  There is a picture at the EWTN article here:

The altar is visibly being used for the purposes of the Jewish celebration, has been covered with Jewish religious artifacts, and the rest of the sanctuary/nave modified for their use.  Is this permissible in the GIRMs?

This is the second year this parish has allowed this Jewish congregation to use their facility.  STORY.

I don’t know if the Catholic pastor was aware of this, but the rabbi of the group using his church is also a board member of the local Planned Parenthood.

From a standpoint of what is "acceptable use" of a Catholic Church as indicated in the rubrics, is turning over the sanctuary to a rabbi and his group permissible?

First, I have actually been to that church in Austin and have even said Mass there, quite a few year ago.

I consulted a reliable canonist to get this issue.

The 1993 Directory for the Application of the Principles and Norms on Ecumenism make provision for other Christian denominations to use our churches:

137. Catholic churches are consecrated or blessed buildings which have an important theological and liturgical significance for the Catholic community. They are therefore generally reserved for Catholic worship. However, if priests, ministers or communities not in full communion with the Catholic Church do not have a place or the liturgical objects necessary for celebrating worthily their religious ceremonies, the diocesan Bishop may allow them the use of a church or a Catholic building and also lend them what may be necessary for their services. Under similar circumstances, permission may be given to them for interment or for the celebration of services at Catholic cemeteries."

This refers to other Christian denominations. It also gives caveats to guard against scandal.

Also, note that the diocesan bishop gets to make these decisions.  I take it that pastors cannot make this decision on their own.

In an emergency situation, allowing a Jewish community to use a church for their worship could be appropriate (e.g., the synagogue burns down, there is a furnace problem in winter, etc.). In such a case, it could be appropriate to remove the Crucifix and Blessed Sacrament during the duration of their visit.

BUT… wholesale alteration or rearrangement of the sanctuary?  No.  That’s just wrong.  This story strikes me as a bit odd, frankly.  Jews are usually very sensitive and respectful of the religious spaces of Christians.  Placing the Star of David over the tabernacle is just plain wrong.  I hope that this was done from ignorance and without the knowledge of the pastor.

The altar and the tabernacle are sacred things in se, and not merely because of what they are used for.  If they can’t be moved (and they shouldn’t be able to be, really), then they should either be left barren, or covered in a nondescript fashion, not re-ordered to accommodate their use in Jewish worship.

I have little doubt that Jews would have serious problems were Catholics whose church burned down used their synagogue’s bema for Mass, put a crucifix on the ark, and replaced the Torah scrolls with the Blessed Sacrament.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , ,
36 Comments