Daily Rome Shot 785

Photo by The Great Roman™

Welcome new registrants:

bevious
Al Jolson

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit.

Black (Karpov) to move and mate (Korchnoi) in 3.

These two really hated each other. Their rivalry is legendary.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Interested in learning?  Try THIS.

Yesterday in one of the opening matches of the Chess.com Speed Chess Championship, my guy Wesley So defeated Levon Aronian handily. Still in the Round of 16. Big names are playing: Magnus, Ding, Hikaru, Fabi, Gukesh, MVL, etc. Format, three segments: 90 minutes of 5+1, 60 minutes of 3+1, and 30 minutes of 1+1. A total of $150K prize money.

I was happy to see that more of you are doing the puzzles and that some of you went to visit Chess House.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments

VIDEO: It looks like the Shroud of Turin isn’t a photograph, but rather a movie that shows Christ’s first breath, movement of the Resurrection.

So, yesterday (technically), I posted the previous post (HERE) in which I reflect on how scientific advancements tell us more about things like the Shroud of Turin.

Little did I know when I posted that, that I would stay up into the week hours watching THIS.  “The new astonishing phenomenon detected on the Shroud

If I understood this correctly, there are found on the Shroud multiple images of the same objects and parts of the body, rather like strobe photography.   Some of the objects found include a pin that exactly matches shapes of the Sudarium of Oviedo, tefillin, nails still in the wounds, a garment and belt of snakeskin around the waist, etc.  It also reveals that the body was prostrate, that is, face down.

Moreover, multiple “strobe” images of identifiable things impressed on the fabric, imply that at the moment the image was made, the body was in motion. 

In other words, the Shroud is not just a snapshot.  It’s a movie of a brief moment when the figure moves, clenches his hand, turns his foot, and starts breathing.

In addition, there is a description of the energy source that made the image.  The energy was bursting from within the body in both directions, obviously, and seemingly from a great distance, so that the “rays” are, in effect, parallel.   This would be caused, perhaps, if there is a single point of energy, by something not entirely understood, but maybe by bending of space/time.  See about 47:30 and following.

More on space/time, which involves the energy source that put the image on the Shroud.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
7 Comments

Did God make the universe so huge in order to give us some idea of what “eternity” is?

It has been a long time since I’ve read St. Gregory of Nyssa, but when I saw this video in an x-tweet, something jumped to mind.

If memory serves, Gregory described our experience of the Beatific Vision as a spiral.

I had to think about that for a while, but it makes sense.

Consider that in the Beatific we will always be striving to see the Triune God and be in union.  That implies an eternal rising toward, motion toward God, the ultimate reditus,or rather, proodos.   One might describe that motion vector as a ray, since we are moving out of ourselves towards God.

However, we are made in God’s image and likeness.  Hence, as we behold God we will be learning, coming to understand more about ourselves, considering ourselves in relation to God.  One might describe that motion vector as a circle, since we are being introspective.

These two dynamic motions, the ray and circle, are going on at the same time.  See where I’m going with this?  That would make a spiral.

I’ve sometimes marveled at the fact that which each new technological advance, we find something more to the Mystery which is so alluring and also at times frightening.  For example, photography shows us that the Shroud of Turin is a negative image.   Supercolliders show us subatomic particles while space telescopes show us so many stars even in just one degree of the sky in one direction that we can’t count them, and that’s only seeing just so far.

Did God make the universe so huge to give us some idea of what “eternity” is?  What “all-mighty” might be?

Meanwhile, we await the moment when the created universe will be destroyed in fire, renewed, and submitted by the Son to the Father so that God might be all in all (1 Cor 15:28).

 

 

GO TO CONFESSION!

UPDATE:

Posted in Four Last Things, Look! Up in the sky! |
6 Comments

Something from one of the, sadly, funniest Catholic bloggers

Here’s something from one of the, sadly, funniest Catholic bloggers, Eccles.

I don’t know who you are, friend, but if you ever identify yourself to me in person, I will a) keep your identity secret and b) buy you a beer or whatever.

Libs… try to understand something here.  Read the first sentence (which comes after the title).  It’s satire, okay?

Mongolians shocked as Genghis Khan praises Pope Francis

A surprise message received from the afterlife, which has been attributed to the late Genghis Khan, has shocked faithful Mongolians because it praises Pope Francis.

“Now he’s really put his foot in it!”

“Some ‘rigid’ people have criticised the Holy Warlord for his policy of mass-murder and torture, but we never thought he would stoop so low as to praise a man who teaches heresy, gerrymanders synods, and persecutes people who want to follow traditional forms of worship,” says sumo-wrestler Mai Cluis, who runs the popular Where Genghis Is website.

His little friend Osten Iveree, author of the warlord biographies “Genghis Khan, the great Reformer”, “Wounded Wolfman” and “Let us massacre – the path to a better future”, agrees. “Genghis should stick to what he knows best, and not try to endorse controversial figures simply to curry favour with people.”

Finally, even Chams Mahteen, another compulsive writer, responsible for “Destroying a bridge with people on it”, “Learning to Prey” and “Come forth and slaughter the Khwarezmid Empire”, thinks Genghis Khan has gone too far. “He should keep out of Catholic politics and concentrate on LGBT issues,” he says.

Next week: “I think he’s a terrible pope, too,” admits Ivan.

Dear readers, you might not see eye to eye with Eccles, you might even think that Francis was right to praise Genghis Khan, but you’ve got to admit that this is pretty clever.

And for those of you in Columbia Heights, yes, that’s how people over there spell those words.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
4 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 784

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

Welcome new registrant:

Loquitur

Meanwhile, white can force mate in two.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

The traditional Benedictine monks in Norcia make wonderful beer. Three kinds!

Tata Steel INDIA is underway. Men’s Rapid is on. Also going on is the FIDE Women’s Team Championship in Bydgoszcz. QUICK! How many of you know where Bydgoszcz without looking it up? I don’t, but I’d guess it is Poland.

Speaking of Poland, would any of you be interested in a TLM pilgrimage to Poland next year?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

Mass “facing the people”

This is fun.

You know… now that I see this…

Posted in Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
1 Comment

On airplane from Mongolia Francis is asked about the book “The Synodal (“walking together”) Process Is a Pandora’s Box: 100 Questions and Answers”. His response.

On the way back to Rome, Francis was slightly Mongolian grilled when asked about the book that is making waves The Synodal Process ((“walking together”)) Is a Pandora’s Box: 100 Questions and Answers which has a Preface by Card. Burke.  All over Twitter/X libs are having spittle-flecked nutties about this book, which is being sent out to all sorts of people.

Full disclosure: I have not read it.  It is being sent for free to various folks such as faculties in schools, but not to me.  HEY… BOOK SENDERS!  SEND ME A PDF!

Here was Francis’ “answer”. Please note – again – the repeated reliance on the undefined label “ideology”.  Also, Pentin gives an explanatory paragraph at the end of his tweet.  Don’t confuse that with Francis’ “answer”.  Well.. you won’t.

NB: Burke’s Preface says that what is at work through all this synod (“walking together”) stuff is an attempt radically to change the Church’s self-understand and her doctrine, proof of which we see in Germany where there is total chaos and division verging on schism.

You can hit the “read more” below, but here is Francis’ “answer”:

I’m not making this up.  The whole airplane interview is HERE.  The reporter who asked about the book is Antonio Pelayo (Vida Nueva).

“If you go to the root of these ideas, you will find ideologies,” Francis told the reporters. “Always, when one wants to detach from the path of communion in the Church, what always pulls it apart is ideology. And they accuse the Church of this or that, but they never make an accusation of what is true: (it is made up of) sinners. They never speak of sin … They defend a “doctrine”, a doctrine like distilled water that has no taste and is not true Catholic doctrine, that is, in the Creed. And that very often scandalizes. How scandalous is the idea that God became flesh, that God became Man, that Our Lady kept her virginity? This scandalizes.”

A few points.

“Always, when one wants to detach from the path of communion in the Church, what always pulls it apart is ideology.”

That is exactly what is being applied in the SYNODAL (“walking togetheral”) process, not the in the calls for clarity and explanations of how there isn’t being engineered a departure from communion.

And they accuse the Church of this or that, but they never make an accusation of what is true:

Gratis asseritur gratis negatur.  Sed Contra, those who are wary of the synodal (“walking togetheral”) process are citing MAGISTERIAL documents, etc.   Of course these are precisely the documents, such as Veritatis splendor and virtually the entire magisterium of John Paul II and of Benedict XVI that these synodists (“walking togetherists”) are trying to deep six.

They defend a “doctrine”, a doctrine like distilled water that has no taste and is not true Catholic doctrine, that is, in the Creed

I read this again and again.  I ran it by a serious theologian.  He seems to think that if something isn’t in the Creed, it is not really “doctrine”.  Rather, if it is something that he/they want changed it is labelled “ideology”.  It is “distilled water” (which ironically is pure and without contaminants).

And that very often scandalizes. How scandalous is the idea that God became flesh, that God became Man, that Our Lady kept her virginity? This scandalizes.”

Hence, defending doctrines (aka “distilled water ideologies” that are not in the Creed is a source of scandal.  Then he shifts over to articles in the Creed which supposedly makes his point.   What point that is, I don’t know.  It seems to me that there are in fact theologians out there who deny the virgin birth, that Christ really had two perfect natures, etc.  They often have SJ by their names.  But they are not the one’s leery of the synodal (“walking together”) process.  It’s the ones who deny articles of the Creed (BTW… he didn’t say which Creed) who want the synodal process.

In fact, he seems to have turned this whole thing inside out.

It’s sort of like Bearded-Spock Synod (“walking together” … with knives).

Can anyone set me straight here?  Where have I misunderstood him?

They defend a “doctrine”, a doctrine like distilled water that has no taste and is not true Catholic doctrine, that is, in the Creed.

What are few doctrines… sorry, gotta get used to this new category… ideologies which are NOT in the Creed (I assume the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed)?

Off the top of my head…

Institution of the Sacraments by Christ
The Assumption of Mary
The Immaculate Conception
Purgatory
Infallibility
Transubstantiation (okay, that’s in Paul’s VI Credo of the People of God)
Original Sin

These are not in the N-C Creed recited at Mass.   So, I guess it is, what?, a scandal to defend them?  They are either subject to change or they are mere ideologies?

The tweet.

Folks… I dunno.  Can someone explain what I am getting wrong?

BTW, as an exercise, go to the full interview and do a CTL+F search on “ideolog” and see what you get.  Among the results:

An ideology is incapable of incarnation; it is only an idea. But when ideology gathers strength and becomes politics, it usually becomes a dictatorship, right? It becomes an incapacity to dialogue, to move forward with cultures. And imperialisms do this. Imperialism always consolidates starting from an ideology.

Posted in Pò sì jiù, SESSIUNCULA, Synod, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
22 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 783

Photo by The Great Roman™

White to move and mate in two.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Yesterday, Magnus defeated Alireza to win the Generation Cup, part of the Chess Champions Tour.  He, of course, clinched a spot in the big battle in Toronto next December.  Carlsen has been in four of the five tournaments in the Tour.  He has won three and finished third in one.   Sam Sevian won Division 3 and Nepo won Division 2.

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
6 Comments

That look on your face when…

That look on your face when you get stuck with the bill at the Mongolian Grill.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
1 Comment

WDTPRS – 14th Sunday after Pentecost: the finger

This Sunday’s Collect for the Extraordinary Form survived the snipping and pasting of the Consilium and the late Annibale Bugnini’s liturgical experts to be used in the Ordinary Form on Tuesday of the 2nd week of Lent.  Figure that one out.

Custodi, Domine, quaesumus, Ecclesiam tuam propitiatione perpetua: et quia sine te labitur humana mortalitas; tuis semper auxiliis et abstrahatur a noxiis, et ad salutaria dirigatur.

Propitiatio, in its fundamental meaning, is “an appeasing, atonement, propitiation”. The dictionary of liturgical Latin Blaise/Dumas also gives us a view of the word as “favor”. This makes sense. God has been appeased and rendered favorable again towards us sinners by the propitiatory actions Christ fulfilled on the Cross. We have renewed these through the centuries in Holy Mass.

Mortalitas refers, as you might guess, to the fact that we die, our mortality. Inherent in the word is the concept that we die in our flesh. So, you ought also to hear “flesh” when you hear mortalitas.

Labitur is from labor. This is not the substantive labor but the verb, labor, lapsus. It means, “to glide, fall, to move gently along a smooth surface, to fall, slide”.

Auxilium, in the plural, has a military overtone. There is also a medical undertone too, “an antidote, remedy, in the most extended sense of the word”. Pair this up with noxius, a, um, which points at things which are injurious or harmful. There is a moral element as well or “a fault, offence, trespass”.

Salutaria is the plural of neuter salutare which looks like an infinitive but isn’t. Our constant companion the Lewis & Short Dictionary says the neuter substantive salutare is “salvation, deliverance, health” in later Latin. The adjectival form, salutaris, is “of or belonging to well-being, healthful, wholesome”. Think of English “salutary” and O salutaris hostia in the Eucharistic hymn by St. Thomas Aquinas (+1274).

When this word is in the neuter plural (salutaria) there is a phrase in Latin bibere salutaria alicui … to drink one’s health” or literally “to drink healths to someone”. In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet during the famous “Queen Mab” speech Mercutio declares that a soldier dreams, inter alia, of “healths five fathom deep,” (I, iv) and in Henry VIII the King says to Cardinal Wolsey, “I have half a dozen healths to drink to these” (I, iv).

Wine and health are closely related in the ancient world. In the parable of the Good Samaritan the good passerby pours oil and wine into the wounds of the man who was assaulted (Luke 10:25-37). St. Paul wrote to St. Timothy:

“No longer drink only water, but take a little wine for the sake of your stomach and your frequent ailments” (1 Tim 5:23).

Apart from its resemblance to blood, it is no surprise that Christ should choose this healthful daily staple as the matter of our saving Sacrament.

Wine was often safer to drink than water in the ancient world, though it was nearly always mixed with water to some extent. To drink uncut wine, merum in Latin (from the adjective merus “unadulterated”, giving us the English word “mere”) was considered barbaric. Cicero (+43 BC) and others hurled that accusation at Marcus Antonius (+31 BC) who was a renowned merum swiller.

Catholics sing the word merum in the hymn of the Holy Thursday liturgy, Pange lingua gloriosi, by St. Thomas Aquinas: “fitque sanguis Christi merum… and the (uncut) wine becomes the Blood of Christ”. In sacramental terms, there is a link between wine and health in the sense of salvation. During Holy Mass, we offer gifts of wine with water to become our spiritual “healths” once it is changed into the Blood of Christ. These archaic and literary references help us drill into the language of our prayers.

Let’s drill some more. Did you know that the index finger was called digitus salutaris, and that the ancient Romans held it up when greeting people? We don’t do that very often these days. I believe modern usage, at least on roadways, more commonly employs a different finger.

The special designations of fingers in Latin are pollex (thumb); index or salutaris (forefinger); medius, infamis or impudicus (middle finger); minimo proximus or medicinalis (ring finger); minimus (little finger, “pinky”). The priest, during Mass in the Vetus Ordo, always holds the consecrated Host only between his thumb and the digitus salutaris. One way to harm a priest, our mediator at the altar and in the confessional, was to chop off his index fingers.   This was done to the North American martyrs and missionaries.  Priests without those fingers were forbidden to say Mass without special permission from the Holy See.  Those significance of those fingers was clearly understood by those who hate the Church, priesthood, and the Eucharist as being especially important.  Even the thumb can play a kind of mystical priestly role in the Mass.  During Mass when the priest has his hands together, he places his right thumb over his left to form a cross.  This is deliberate in the Roman Rite, and it is indicated as such in the Ritus Servandus at the beginning of the Missal.

III De initio Missae
Sacerdos cum primum descenderit sub infimum gradum altaris, convertit se ad ipsum altare, ubi stans in medio, iunctis manibus ante pectus, extensis et iunctis pariter digitis, et pollice dextero super sinistrum posito in modum crucis (quod semper servatur quando iunguntur manus, praeterquam post Consecrationem), detecto capite, facta prius Cruci vel altari profunda reverentia, vel si in eo sit tabernaculum sanctissimi Sacramenti, facta genuflexione, erectus incipit Missam.

III. The Beginning of Mass

1. When the priest has descended to the lowest level of the Altar, he turns toward the Altar, and standing in the middle, with his hands joined before his breast with fingers extended and together, and with his right thumb over his left in the form of a cross (which form is always to be observed when joining the hands until after the Consecration), and with his head uncovered, having first reverenced the Crucifix or Altar, or if a Tabernacle containing the Blessed Sacrament is on the Altar, having genuflected, standing erect, he begins the Mass.

The Vetus Ordo is replete with details that bring great richness to our full, conscious and actual participation. Just sayin’.

And if you are wondering.  No.  It isn’t.

Let’s push this a little more.

The adjective medicinalis, “medicinal, healing”, comes from the verb medeor or medico, the original meaning of which has to do with “to heal” by magic. The verb traces back to the stem med– or “middle”. So, medicus, “doctor” is associated with “mediator”. We can think of this in terms of the English word “medium”, who is a mediator with the spirit world. The Latin poet Silius Italicus (Tiberius Catius Asconius Silius Italicus +101) called a magician “medicus vulgus” (Punica, III, 300). The ancients saw what we call the “ring finger” as having magical powers. This is reflected in the name digitus medicinalis, the “medicinal/magic” finger.

One of the most important Patristic Christological images in the ancient Church is Christus Medicus, the “Physician”. St. Augustine does amazing things with this image, and Christus Mediator. He is the doctor of the ailing soul. He is the only mediator between God and man.

LITERAL RENDERING:

Guard your Church, we beseech You, O Lord, with perpetual favor, and since without You our mortal flesh slides toward ruin by means of your helping remedies let it be pulled back from injuries and be guided unto saving healths.

Watch how the old incarnation of ICEL ruined the imagery.

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

Lord, watch over your Church,
and guide it with your unfailing love.
Protect us from what could harm us
and lead us to what will save us.
Help us always, for without you we are bound to fail.

We won’t ever have to hear that one again!

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

Guard your Church, we pray, O Lord, in your unceasing mercy,
and, since without you mortal humanity is sure to fall,
may we be kept by your constant helps from all harm
and directed to all that brings salvation
.

We all know the image of the slippery slope. Once you are on this slope, scrabble and scratch with your weak hands as you can, and you can’t get a purchase.

You slide and slide, faster and faster.  Down.

Our fallen nature and our habitual sins drag us onto the slope from which we cannot save ourselves.

In the sacraments and teachings of Holy Church, Christ extends the fingers of His saving hand.

He draws us back from a deadly slide with His Almighty hand.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS |
2 Comments