Tax reform, USCCB, Catholic Charities USA

Our friend The Motley Monk has some observations about tax reform, the USCCB and government funding of charities.  Here is the first part:

If you’re really interested in tax reform, the USCCB and Catholic Charities USA may not be…

Wall Street Journal op-ed calling into question whether tax “reform” should disallow the deduction for charitable donations offers a nugget of data that Catholics interested in tax reform should carefully consider.

The “nugget” is the total amount of money the federal government is pouring into charitable programs sponsored by the United States Catholic Conference of Bishops (USCCB) and Catholic Charities USA (CC-USA).  The op-ed notes:

Religious organizations also receive large infusions of federal funds. Catholic Charities USA receives more than half of its funding each year ($554 million in 2010) from federal grants. In 2012, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops received $63 million…in federal grants.

It’s difficult to unpack the exact numbers because the recipients oftentimes use multiple names.  That said, the USCCB directly received $34,767,249 in the form of three awards in 2012.  That’s 17.3% of its 2012 annual budget.  CC-USA directly received $34,767,249 in 2012 for 21 contracts with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The President of the William Simon Foundation, James Piereson, who wrote the op-ed, stated:

These are reputable institutions, and many of the programs they sponsor are important. Nevertheless, in view of their dependence upon government funds, no one can seriously maintain that these groups are “independent.” Instead, they form one of the more powerful lobbying forces in Washington for increasing government spending, especially spending on tax-exempt groups.

Forget all of that “lobbying” to garner more federal largess which, in turn, only increases the federal tax burden on the less than 50% of U.S. citizens who pay income tax.

Bad as that is, all of that lobbying represents these organizations’ ever-increasing dependency upon the federal government to subsidize their “charitable” work.  And that’s the problem: The government knows just how to pull those strings when it’s to the government’s advantage to do so.

[…]

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
18 Comments

Sister goes door to door asking Catholics to return to Mass

Never underestimate the power of an invitation.

Once upon a time there were groups like Legion of Mary, which could canvass parish neighborhoods.  Once upon a time, priests even walked about neighborhoods working on a census.  Then again, parish neighborhoods were often ethnically concentrated, etc. etc.  Neighborhoods were more self-enclosed, having small groceries, dairies, butchershops, hardware stores grouped on a corner every few blocks or so.  Times have changed.

But this story is perfect for your Just Too Cool file.

From The Catholic Sun, newspaper of the Diocese of Phoenix, where Bp. Olmsted reigns.

Catholics Matter: Intrepid sister goes door-to-door inviting Catholics to Mass

That knock at the door might not be a sales person. Sr. Margery Therese Harkin, PVMI, with her soft Irish brogue and sparkling blue eyes, is out pounding the streets, looking for the lost sheep, even as the summer’s brutal heat beats down on her pale blue dress and veil.

Accompanied by seminarians or lay people, Sr. Margery visits homes, inquiring if there are any baptized Catholics in residence and inviting them to church. A religious sister belonging to the New-York-based Parish Visitors of Mary Immaculate, Sr. Margery said some of those whom she visits decide to attend her RCIA classes.

“We always tell them that the priest sent us,” Sr. Margery said. “Just as the Apostles were sent, we never go in our own name.”

She and two other sisters reside in a convent at Christ the King Parish in Mesa, but 30 hours a week, Sr. Margery is working to bring people into — or home to — the Catholic Church at St. Vincent de Paul Parish in Phoenix.

This is her third year at the west-side parish and she estimates she’s visited about 4,000 homes. Previously, Sr. Margery worked in the neighborhoods surrounding Queen of Peace and St. Timothy in Mesa and St. Daniel in Scottsdale. She’s also trained teams of parish visitors in other states.

She doesn’t pressure people — she merely invites them and lets God do the rest.

In Florida, a woman answered the door and admitted she hadn’t been back to church in 30 years because something a priest did offended her.  [I know this is a real thing.  I have talked to people think this way, but – how dumb is that considering the loss of spiritual benefits? When people say things like this, I suspect there is some other reason.]

“We’re taught we have to listen,” Sr. Margery said of the encounter. “She needed to tell her story.” Though apprehensive, the woman decided to come back to the Church.

[…]

There is more there.

Fr. Z kudos to Sister.

I wonder what Sr. Simone and the bus-nuns would say about this.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS, Just Too Cool, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Women Religious | Tagged ,
40 Comments

Handy tool tip!

This has nothing to do with anything controversial for a change.

I just used my diminutive keyring-sized multi-tool to fix something and I thought I would share the joy.

This is the Swiss+Tech ST53100 Micro-Max 19-in-1 Key Ring Multi-Function Pocket Tool. (UK, a bit more expensive for you lot, click HERE).

I keep one of these clipped to my backpack.

20130718-092319.jpg

It fits in the palm of your hand and weighs only about 59 g.

20130718-092326.jpg

As opposed to the always useful Leatherman (sent from my wish list by a friendly reader here, thanks!) which comes in at 290 g.

20130718-092333.jpg

You can put it on a key-ring, it being key-ring size, and all.

To attach it, you open up the tool and open the little pliers, close them around the ring to which you desire to attach the gizmo, and then fold it up on itself again.

20130718-092350.jpg

Showing off.

20130718-092356.jpg

As I mentioned, I attached one to a strap on the backpack which I use as my carry-on when travelling.  TSA has never given it a second glance. Now that I think of it, I haven’t ever seen Taking Scissors Away even notice it.

And for anyone looking closely, I wrangle the dangling ends of those straps on the pack with these. HERE

20130718-092342.jpg

Very handy for those pesky loose ends.

This has been a public service announcement.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Just Too Cool, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
11 Comments

Bishops of England and Wales about passage of same-sex ‘marriage’

From the Bishops of England and Wales (emphases mine):

Statement on on the passing of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act

Statement by the President and Vice-President of the Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales

In receiving Royal Assent, the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act marks a watershed in English law and heralds a profound social change. This fact is acknowledged by both advocates and opponents of the Act.

Marriage has, over the centuries, been publicly recognised as a stable institution which establishes a legal framework for the committed relationship between a man and a woman and for the upbringing and care of their children. It has, for this reason, rightly been recognised as unique and worthy of legal protection.

The new Act breaks the existing legal links between the institution of marriage and sexual complementarity. With this new legislation, marriage has now become an institution in which openness to children, and with it the responsibility on fathers and mothers to remain together to care for children born into their family unit, are no longer central. That is why we were opposed to this legislation on principle.

Along with others, we have expressed real concern about the deficiencies in the process by which this legislation came to Parliament, and the speed with which it has been rushed through. We are grateful particularly therefore to those Parliamentarians in both Houses who have sought to improve the Bill during its passage, so that it enshrines more effective protection for religious freedom.

A particular concern for us has also been the lack of effective protection for Churches which decide not to opt-in to conducting same sex marriages. [They’ll be gunning for you guys over there now.] Amendments made in the House of Lords though have significantly strengthened the legal protections in the Act for the Churches. We also welcome the Government’s amendment to the Public Order Act which makes it clear beyond doubt that “discussion or criticism of marriage which concerns the sex of the parties to the marriage shall not be taken of itself to be threatening or intended to stir up hatred”. [For now.] Individuals are therefore protected from criminal sanction under the Public Order Act when discussing or expressing disagreement with same sex marriage.

In other respects, however, the amendments we suggested have not been accepted. We were concerned to provide legislative clarity for schools with a religious character. This was in order to ensure that these schools will be able to continue to teach in accordance with their religious tenets. Given the potential risk that future guidance given by a Secretary of State for education regarding sex and relationships education could now conflict with Church teaching on marriage, we were disappointed that an amendment to provide this clarity was not accepted.  The Minister made clear in the House of Lords, however, that in “having regard” to such guidance now or in the future schools with a religious character can “take into account other matters, including in particular relevant religious tenets”, and that “having regard to a provision does not mean that it must be followed assiduously should there be good reason for not doing so”. These assurances go some way to meeting the concerns we and others expressed.

We were disappointed that a number of other amendments to safeguard freedom of speech and the rights of civil registrars to conscientious objection were not passed. But Ministerial assurances have been made […riiiiiight…]that no one can suffer detriment or unfavourable treatment in employment because she or he holds the belief that marriage can only be between a man and a woman.

The legal and political traditions of this country are founded on a firm conviction concerning the rights of people to hold and express their beliefs and views, at the same time as respecting those who differ from them. It is important, at this moment in which deeply held and irreconcilable views of marriage have been contested, to affirm and strengthen this tradition.

For more information please visit our section ‘Speak Out For Marriage‘.

Well written.  Alas, I fear it will make little difference.

But, whether or not it is effective is not the point.

We must continue to struggle for religious freedom and for the truth about marriage.  Even if we lose, we retain our moral capital and – I hope – the friendship of Almighty God.

Posted in New Evangelization, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , ,
23 Comments

SSPX ITALY condemns Pope Francis for visiting refugees – UPDATED – distorted news account?

UPDATE 18 July:

There are some comments in the combox which help us get to what SSPX Italy really said.   Take a look and decide if Gazzetta distorted the story.

______________

From Gazzetta del Sud (their translation):

Lefebvrists chide pope over visit to immigrant island

‘Against centuries of defending Italy from Muslim invasion’

Rome, July 16 – The Italian chapter of the Catholic traditionalist Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) [So, this was not from the SSPX superior, Bp. Fellay.  It is hard to know if he was consulted.]condemned Pope Francis on Tuesday for visiting immigrants and refugees on the island of Lampedusa. In a statement, the Lefebvrist breakaway group criticized the pope for going against centuries of Church efforts to “preserve Catholicism” in the face of the “Mohammedan invasion,” recalling “popes, among whom many saints, who armed fleets to stop the (armed, of course) Muslims in Italy”. [Perhaps a distinction is in order: in centuries past Muslims invaded because they were intent on spreading Islam.  These illegal immigrants are probably not doing that.] Last week Francis chose Lampedusa, an island off the coast of Sicily, as the destination for his first official trip as pope, drawing attention to the plight of thousands who cross the Mediterranean – and the many who die in the process – each year trying to immigrate through Italy. SSPX said the visit reflected the influence of a “Masonic plot to create a multi-cultural society”. [Look.  Masonry in Italy is not what it is in the USA, or even in England.  It is far more virulent, anti-Catholic.  But… read that again.  Sounds pretty weird.] SSPX broke away from the Church over theological differences stemming from the changes it adopted with the Second Vatican Council of some 45 years ago. The Vatican is currently engaged in a process aimed at formally reuniting the group with the Catholic Church.

And this statement really helped that, I’m sure.

Posted in Francis, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, Throwing a Nutty, You must be joking! | Tagged , , , ,
43 Comments

St. Paul: A big small victory for religious freedom!

In my native place, more anti-Christian news, but with a small victory:

City of St. Paul stops fighting statue of Jesus atop bluff
by Bill Keller

ST. PAUL, Minn. (KMSP)

See Video HERE [Watch.  This man is an inspiration.]

There’s a marble statue of Jesus standing 17 feet tall on top of a Mississippi River bluff overlooking downtown St. Paul, and the owner says it’s there to stay now that the city has stopped fighting it.
“I’m very happy,” Tuan Pham said.
Pham told FOX 9 News he won his battle with the City of St. Paul after years of struggling over the 4-ton statue. The stony stalemate began with an anonymous complaint in 2011.
Pham bought his home in 2007 after emigrating from Vietnam with his wife and 10 children in 1980. He commissioned the statue as a replica of the 105-foot Christ of Vung Tao statue in his native country.
Initially, the city asked Pham to remove the statue because of its proximity to the edge of the bluff. They also denied his appeal because an ordinance required a 40-foot setback from the edge of the bluff.
Yet, comments made by one City Council member about religious statues on the bluff were what set the stage for a civil rights lawsuit.
“In our view, this case wasn’t about bluff setback,” explained James Magnuson, of Mohrman & Kaardal. “This case was about the right for a citizen to worship as he chose.”
So after losing his first fight with City Hall, Pham called upon a higher power – the U.S. Constitution.
Fundamentally, we think this is a case about religious liberty,” Magnuson said. “Tuan Pham was a man who escaped religious persecution in Vietnam and he came to this country, as he says, ‘to build a better life based on ability to exercise his religion freely.'”
With legal help from the Alliance Defending Freedom, Pham ultimately settled with the city without going to court. In fact, Pham was so excited he even had the settlement agreement bronzed to confirm the statue will stay for years to come. [I love this guy!]
“My reaction was, ‘Thank God,'” he said. “Here in the free country — no matter how big you are, how small I am, how rich you are, how poor I am — we have equal treatment.
Yet even as he struggled with the city, Pham also had to deal with an arsonist who damaged the statue by piling wood around the base and setting it alight in April 2012. While the statue escaped with a few streaks of soot and discoloration, the family was very shaken by the brazen vandal being on their property. The statue has since been restored and Pham said it looks “like new.”

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged ,
8 Comments

REVIEW: The book on Augustine which Pope Benedict would have wanted to write.

I am reading a new biography of Augustine published by a fresh, talented writer, Miles Hollingworth.

Don’t let the title, St Augustine of Hippo, An Intellectual Biography, fool you. This is not a highbrow book intended for college professors, with an avalanche of technical footnotes coming at you. In fact this is the most readable life of Augustine I have ever read (and I have read a few).

UK readers click HERE
USA HERE

There are two compelling features to the book. Its style is poetic. Moreover, the treatment Hollingworth offers to well chosen points in Augustine’s thought is meditative.

This is a decidedly fresh take on Augustine.

The first line from the book’s preface reads, “In writing this book I have had the sensation of having written the story of one of the world’s great novelists.” To my knowledge no one has ever looked at Augustine through that lens. This kind of original, deep thought about Augustine pervades the 250 or so pages of rich text.

The great difficulty in rendering Augustine’s thought is to translate it into our contemporary terms without debasing it. Hollingworth avoids the trap.  Sample what he offers about Augustine on Adam and Eve:

“In the original aesthetic of Eden, Adam and Eve lived as though humanity were God’s seeing of His own Goodness. Humanity, that piercing vale of sympathies, was God predicating something of Himself, though tantalizingly mysteriously. Augustine would see it of even greater moment still that Christ had been made man. Humanity for him was pluvia occultis, ‘hidden rain’.”

This book is not a fast read.

You will be forced, but not against your will, to take your time with this book, to ponder paragraphs, even sentences.

In Hollingworth’s biography, Augustine speaks to you, often interrogating you: “This is what I think, what do you think?”.

The book is a long conversation with Augustine’s reader. While evading morbidity completely, Hollingworth also focuses his attention on Augustine’s greatest concerns: love and death, which are the lodestones of his thought. These motifs wind through the whole book. In treating these and other intertwining themes, Hollingworth captures the pastoral essence of Augustine’s writings.  For example:

“To help his flock, Augustine began to go inside himself more and more to learn there what truly helps a distressed and fearful people … He studied himself: a man lying in bed at night remembering a lost lover and a lost son. And he started to see this activity as the wonderful thing, the crowning thing.”

The book itself is well bound and designed.  It even feels good in one’s hands.

This could be a good book to take on a retreat.

I hope Pope Benedict will be able to read it.

I think this is the book on Augustine which Benedict would have wanted to write.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Patristiblogging, REVIEWS | Tagged , ,
11 Comments

It’s Twofer Day!

Reason #6675 for Anglicanorum coetibus.

But wait!  There’s more!

Reason #367588 for Summorum Pontificum.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Remember: We are supposed to be more like them, right?

 

Posted in Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, You must be joking! | Tagged ,
71 Comments

When clowns attack

WARNING:

This may make your eyes and ears bleed.  No.  Really.

It is hard to know how to react to this.  I have so many thoughts and emotions at once.

Preliminary observations:

  • I think what you are going to see is not part of a Mass.  The book is a Bible and not a Lectionary.  Still.
  • This is a service presider over by a Catholic bishop.
  • What they are doing is culturally so far removed from my experience that I am left astonished.
  • But that is not quite true either: This is where what we were taught about “liturgy” in my seminary in the USA in ’80’s would eventually have lead.

Imagine going to a different planet, finding life, dropping off a couple missionaries and a subscription to the National Schismatic Reporter and then moving on.  You return a couple centuries later, open the door of your Tardis, and find…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxfO7a7_bWs&feature=player_embedded

Reason #7856642 for Summorum Pontificum!

Surely they are doing something they consider an expression of joy and of honor. I can’t, however, shake the thought that this is a different religion.

It is amazing how certain pieces of music come to be inextricably bound up with a certain activity or context.  This also shows how, over a long time, musical idioms can drift or take on an entirely different connotation.

The name of the march used in the video is really “Entrance of the Gladiators”.  Composed in the 19th century, it was originally a military march.  When played at a quicker tempo and removed to a different context, the sound of this particular march will invoke only one thing… at least to Americans.  What it means to Brazilians is hard to gauge.

At the same time, this event seems to have been at Aparecida, for their big feast day.  So this is what someone considers an exemplary liturgical moment.

UPDATE:

But wait!  There’s more!

Reason #7856643 for Summorum Pontificum:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0-9BAST1lw&feature=player_embedded

To think that we went from Stabat Mater to this in a generation.

UPDATE:

From Vatican Radio:

Aparecida awaits Pope Francis



(Vatican Radio) As Pope Francis prepares to travel to Brazil for the upcoming World Youth Day celebrations we bring you this Vatican Radio English translation of an interview done in Portugese with Cardinal Raymundo Damasceno Assis, Archbishop of Aparecida

Q: On July 24, the Pope will be in Aparecida.What will happen on this day?

A: I met Pope Francis at the Domus Sanctae Marthae, where I stayed this week, and found him very peaceful and happy about his trip to Brazil – Rio de Janeiro for the World Youth Day and in Aparecida for the visit to the National Shrine . The Pope wants to express his love and his devotion to Our Lady, called in Brazil under the title “Our Lady of Aparecida”, the patron saint of all our country and our people. The Holy Father will arrive in Aparecida around 10:00 am and Mass will begin at 10:30 am inside the Basilica. The Holy Father also told me that at the end of the celebration, he will look down from the balcony (christened with the name of Pope Benedict XVI) to pray with the faithful outside the Sanctuary who will follow the Mass on giant screens. The Pope does not remain aloof from the people. In addition to this meeting to be held immediately after the Mass, the Pope will travel in the ‘Popemobile’ to the line that separates the Basilica of the Seminary. The same will happen in the afternoon when Pope Francis will do the reverse path from the seminary to the Basilica to take the helicopter that will bring him back to Rio de Janeiro. Pope Francis will remain throughout the afternoon at the Seminary, where he will have lunch together with his entourage and in the company of seminarians. It will be a private dinner. After there is a moment of rest. The Pope will bless an image of St. Anthony de Santana Galvão (Frei Galvão, the first Brazilian saint, who was canonized by Pope Benedict XVI in 2007 in São Paulo), born in the city of Guaratinguetá, and is part of the Archdiocese of Aparecida. This image will then be carried in procession, probably in October, during the feast of the saint, in the place where in future there will be a shine built dedicated to him. Again at the seminary, Pope Francis will receive three nuns from cloistered monasteries of our region.

Q: Before Mass, there will be a moment of prayer before the image of Our Lady of Aparecida …

Before the Mass, the Pope will stop in the Chapel of the Apostles to contemplate the original image of Our Lady of Aparecida. The throne of the image is mobile, so if the Pope wants to, it can be turned, so that the image of the Madonna can be directed towards Chapel for him to say this prayer of consecration to Our Lady in the presence of guests and the priests that will be present. This consecration will, in practice, be the same as we do, although there will be slight variations. After the consecration, this will become the new official prayer that we will do every time at the end of a Mass to consecrate the people of Our Lady of Aparecida. Interview Silvonei Protz

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, You must be joking! | Tagged , , , ,
120 Comments