George Zimmerman rescued people from overturned SUV

From AP:

ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — George Zimmerman helped rescue four people from an overturned vehicle in central Florida last week, just days after he was cleared of all charges in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, officials said Monday.

Seminole County Sheriff’s spokeswoman Kim Cannaday said in a statement that deputies responding last Wednesday afternoon to the wreck in Sanford — the Orlando suburb where Martin was shot — found Zimmerman and another man had already helped a couple and their two children out of a flipped SUV off the road near Interstate 4. They were not hurt.

Zimmerman spoke with a deputy at the scene and then left, the sheriff’s office statement said. He did not see the crash happen.

This is believed to be the first time Zimmerman, 29, has been seen publicly since his acquittal on a second-degree murder charge in the 17-year-old Martin’s death in February 2012. Zimmerman’s parents and his attorneys have said in interviews since the verdict that they fear for his safety because of those who may not agree with it.

[…]

Read the rest there.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged
12 Comments

More gender bender news

From Right Wing News:

Democratic California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano has written a bill that would require public schools in his state to allow students to choose which bathrooms, locker rooms and sports teams match their gender identity. Both the Assembly and state Senate have passed Assembly Bill 1266. It now sits on the desk of Gov. Jerry Brown. If the governor allows the bill to become law, then public school administrators won’t be able to assign transgender third-graders to use a separate bathroom or play on the team of their biological gender — even if their motive is to protect a vulnerable child.

“Separate but equal,” Ammiano’s senior legislative assistant, Wendy Hill, told me, already is against the law. Indeed, the new bill wouldn’t really change anything; it would “just (clarify) what current law already states.”

Ammiano never has been known for his tolerance toward dissenting opinions. When the late KGO talk show host Pete Wilson voiced his discomfort about a child born to be raised by a gay San Francisco supervisor and a lesbian partner in 2006, Ammiano, then a San Francisco supervisor, demanded that Wilson resign. (Wilson had said, “A child is not an experiment.” Ammiano accused Wilson of homophobia and “trying to dehumanize a week-old baby.”)

So it’s no surprise that he’d be pushing for a bill that would sanctify the sensitivity of transgender children while steamrolling the feelings of girls who might not want biological boys in their locker rooms or on their soccer teams. (No worries, Hill told me. Those girls could ask for special accommodations if they didn’t want to share facilities with a biologically male girl.)

[]

Posted in Liberals, Pò sì jiù, The future and our choices, You must be joking! | Tagged ,
14 Comments

QUAERITUR: Confirmed, but in state of sin. Am I confirmed?

From a reader:

If a person is confirmed in Mortal Sin, does it ‘count’, or must he/she be conditionally re-confirmed.

What you are asking is “Was the sacrament validly conferred?” or “Is she confirmed?”

Yes.  The sacrament was validly confirmed and she is really confirmed.

But so long as she remains in the state of sin that sacrament is not effective in her life as she would otherwise want it to be.  After a good confession, the effects of that wonderful sacrament will be “activated” as it were.

There is a difference between the reality of the sacrament and the effects together with the reality of the sacrament.

A girl or woman in the state of mortal sin can be validly confirmed.  A woman without sanctifying grace can validly marry.  A man (never never ever a woman) who is lacking the state of grace can be validly ordained.  In these situations they do not benefit from the sacramental graces they could receive.  They need to make a good confession and amend their lives.

Everyone… prepare to receive sacraments through a good sacramental confession.  Reception of Communion is reception of THE Sacrament.

GO TO CONFESSION.

 

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
24 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can the priest say the older, Latin Mass ‘facing the people’?

From a reader:

A local retired priest wishes to begin offering the EF of the Mass, but he wishes to offer it versus populum. He honestly believes he has that option. Is there a specific Church document forbidding this? If I can present this good priest with a Church document, I am certain he will comply. Thank you.

Unfortunately, nothing prevents a priest from being silly.

There are rubrical provisions in the older form the Roman Rite for when the altar is so arranged that the celebrant is “facing the people”. For example, I know a number of Roman basilicas which are so arranged.  I can think of some parishes where the mensa/altar, having been detached from the main altar, is so situated that there is now almost a cliff where the priest would have to stand to say Mass ad orientem.

Alas, I can’t right now think of any document that would absolutely prevent a priest from making this weird decision, which would almost certainly annoy nearly everyone attached to the older form.

It would also be interesting to know his thinking. For example, does he think this is a good way to introduce regular versus populum Novus Ordo goers to the older form? Does he think that by celebrating the Usus Antiquior “facing the people” that that would soften the blow? Be a transition?

For what it’s worth, I think this would be a bad choice.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests | Tagged , , ,
46 Comments

Are we now a nation of blatteroons?

When I take a break from movies with lots of explosions, I like period pieces.  You can’t beat a well done production of a Jane Austen novel or just about any of the 19th century writers.

It happened the other day that I caught a few minutes of Pride and Prejudice, in one of those moments when someone entered a room where other people were.  They stood and bowed or curtsied.  People addressed each other with titles.

Too constraining?

On the other hand, are we becoming a society of cretins?  A community of slubberdegullions? A nation of blatteroons?

The lack of formality, or decorum, must over time take its toll on us collectively.

No where is this more evident than in our churches.

My friend Msgr. Charles Pope has some good comments on reverence in church.  HERE

Among other things he comments on women covering their heads, which always sparks discussion.  And for good reason, because this symbolic gesture goes to the core of what I am talking about.

Do you give thought to what you wear to church?  What your children wear?

Just to muddy the waters a bit, on that classic day when we all are obliged to go to church, does any formality follow you back to the family home, perhaps with a sit-down meal to be shared with proper manners?

ASIDE:

By the by, Msgr. Pope includes a video of the beginning of the movie True Confessions, which starts with a Solemn Nuptial Mass in the Usus Antiquior.  I have a personal connection to this movie, because the very vestments used in that movie, those actual vestments and not vestments like them, were later donated to my home parish in St. Paul, St. Agnes.  I have worn that chasuble quite a few times.  And, yes, when the priest returned to the center of the altar, the deacon and subdeacon should not have been at an angle and the priest should have kept his eyes cast down for the Dominus vobiscum… but its Hollywood and that is about as close to accurate as you get with that lot.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, New Evangelization, O'Brian Tags, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , ,
32 Comments

“brutal, cruel, ferocious and inhuman crimes”

On the Pro Life Wisconsin blog there is a good remind of how strong has been the Church’s teaching – not “policy” as many liberals, even catholics, claim – about abortion.

In 1588, Pope Sixtus V issued a Papal Bull, called Effraenatam, excommunicating anyone directly involved in abortion, and calling on civil authorities to punish abortionists severely. He uses strong language to condemn abortion, calling attacks on the unborn person “brutal, cruel, ferocious and inhuman crimes.” Here’s some more from the declaration:

Who will not condemn to a most grave punishment the impiety of him… who has deprived children of life before they could naturally see light or could be protected by maternal body from ferocious cruelty? Who will not abhor the cruelty and unrestrained debauchery of impious men who have arrived into such a state of mind that they procure poisons in order to extinguish the conceived fetuses within the viscera, and pour them out, trying to provoke by a nefarious crime a violent and untimely death and killing of their progeny? Finally who will not condemn to a most grave punishment the crimes of those who with poisons, potions and evil actions sterilize women or impede that they conceive or give birth by pernicious medicines and drugs?

We are willing to exterminate in our times also this evil as much as a We can by the strength given to Us by the Lord….

Plus ça change.

Speaking of reactions in the past, remember this?  HERE

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Linking Back | Tagged , , ,
10 Comments

DETROIT: “If I had a city….”

Detroit has joined the ranks of the bankrupt.

When I have been driven around in Detroit I had a sense, in some neighborhoods, of what the Russians did to Berlin: looked like a war zone.

What caused the phenomenon “Detroit”, a great city reduced to catastrophe?

I suppose the city never quite recovered from the riots of the 1960’s.  That may have accelerated the downward spiral from prosperity into bankruptcy.

In the meantime, the Obama Administration is doing nothing to help race relations.  In fact, the Administration and the President himself seem intent on making sure there is growing tension.

This mordant image gets at part of the problem, in a darkly humorous way:

Today Pres. Obama held a presser, and few newsies showed up for it.  Make up your own mind.

Are race relations in these USA getting better as Pres. Obama says?  And could “relations” mean?

Is the President helping or harming? He buried the actual substance of the speech in his suggestion (at least) that the Justice Department wasn’t going to prosecute Zimmerman.

I listened to this and got the sense, through all the personal empathy, that this was a political speech to his base that reintroduced race afresh back into public discussion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14moCEtd4Og&feature=player_embedded

 

Posted in Brick by Brick, Dogs and Fleas, Liberals, Pò sì jiù, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , ,
56 Comments

PODCAzT 136: John XXIII opens Vatican II – ‘Gaudet Mater Ecclesia’ – optimism and naïveté, error and continuity

 have wanted to do this for some time.

Today we have as our guest, Pope John XXIII. I read for you the whole of John’s address to the opening of the Second Vatican Council, a speech called Gaudet Mater Ecclesia, of 11 October 1962. We hear a little of the Latin too!

The whole speech is imbued with a sense of hope and optimism. John describes the situation of the Church in the modern world as he saw it the. He spoke about how the Council was announced. He describes in poetic terms what it felt like to be there in that moment, in the Vatican Basilica. The most important thing he said, however, was

The manner in which sacred doctrine is spread, this having been established, it becomes clear how much is expected from the Council in regard to doctrine. That is, the Twenty-first Ecumenical Council, which will draw upon the effective and important wealth of juridical, liturgical, apostolic, and administrative experiences, wishes to transmit the doctrine, pure and integral, without any attenuation or distortion, which throughout twenty centuries, notwithstanding difficulties and contrasts, has become the common patrimony of men. It is a patrimony not well received by all, but always a rich treasure available to men of good will.

Our duty is not only to guard this precious treasure, as if we were concerned only with antiquity, but to dedicate ourselves with an earnest will and without fear to that work which our era demands of us, pursuing thus the path which the Church has followed for twenty centuries. […]
… But from the renewed, serene, and tranquil adherence to all the teaching of the Church in its entirety and preciseness, as it still shines forth in the Acts of the Council of Trent and First Vatican Council, the Christian, Catholic, and apostolic spirit of the whole world expects a step forward toward a doctrinal penetration and a formation of consciousness in faithful and perfect conformity to the authentic doctrine, which, however, should be studied and expounded through the methods of research and through the literary forms of modern thought. The substance of the ancient doctrine of the deposit of faith is one thing, and the way in which it is presented is another. And it is the latter that must be taken into great consideration with patience if necessary, everything being measured in the forms and proportions of a magisterium which is predominantly pastoral in character.

He goes on to speak about how in dealing with errors in the past, the Church had often issued severe condemnations.  Now, however, “the Spouse of Christ prefers to make use of the medicine of mercy rather than that of severity.”

Decide for yourselves how well that has worked.

Also, I found noteworthy for consideration in our own time:

She consider that she meets the needs of the present day by demonstrating the validity of her teaching rather than by condemnations Not, certainly, that there is a lack of fallacious teaching, opinions, and dangerous concepts to be guarded against an dissipated. But these are so obviously in contrast with the right norm of honesty, and have produced such lethal fruits that by now it would seem that men of themselves are inclined to condemn them, particularly those ways of life which despise God and His law or place excessive confidence in technical progress and a well-being based exclusively on the comforts of life. They are ever more deeply convinced of the paramount dignity of the human person and of his perfection as well as of the duties which that implies. Even more important, experience has taught men that violence inflicted on others, the might of arms, and political domination, are of no help at all in finding a happy solution to the grave problems which afflict them.

John’s speech rings with optimism about human nature.

If you have troubles listening through the imbeded player, which is a little twitchy, you can download it here or from iTunes.

Posted in Linking Back, Our Catholic Identity, PODCAzT, Religious Liberty, The Drill, The future and our choices, Vatican II, Year of Faith | Tagged , , , , , ,
32 Comments

Pope Francis is “We”

Today Pope Francis established a new committee – because we needed another committee -the (take a deep breath) Pontifical Commission for Reference on the Organisation of the economic-administrative structure of the Holy See. HERE

So far what I like about this is that in the Chirograph (the personally hand written document) which establishes said committee, Francis used the Papal WE. For example:

A tale scopo, Noi abbiamo deciso … La Commissione svolge i propri compiti a norma del presente Chirografo e delle Nostre disposizioni operative… La Commissione Ci tiene informati sul suo lavoro e Ci consegna gli esiti dello stesso… Essa sarà sciolta su Nostra Disposizione.

What will the English have?

Will the translator respect the Holy Father’s HAND WRITTEN text, his clear desire to use “We”?

Bets?

Posted in Francis, Just Too Cool | Tagged , ,
11 Comments

Miracles and You. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

The Canonical Defender Ed Peters has been asking for prayers and even the intercession of God with a miracle for his injured son, blogger and good Catholic activist Thomas Peters.  Thom is doing better but he has a long way to go.  And what father would not ask these things?  And who of us would not generously respond, especially in gratitude for how much they have done to help us all in learning and defending our Catholic faith and identity?

Since the issue of miracles came up, I repost here what I have written before about miracles HERE. The original post was about the 2nd authenticated miracle for St. Gianna Beretta Molla.

  1. Saints are presented to us by Holy Mother Church for “the two I’s”: imitation and intercession.
  2. As all Christians are called to imitate Christ, we also must experience self-emptying and the Cross, abandonment to providence and self-donation. We must be willing to lose everything.
  3. We are not alone: the Church Militant and the Church Triumphant are closely knit, interwoven in charity. We on earth must intercede for each other and believe and ask for the intercession of the saints.
  4. God makes use of the weak to demonstrate His might and love.
  5. If we do not believe in miracles, we do not ask for them. If we do not ask for them, they will not be granted. [!]
  6. Our life of faith is noticed by non-believers and they are not unaffected.
  7. What a difference a bishop can make.
  8. How often do you invoke the help of the saints and holy angels?
  9. God’s ways are not our ways.
  10. No one is too small to be an occasion of grace for others.
Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, PRAYER REQUEST, Saints: Stories & Symbols, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged ,
5 Comments