Period.

Today we are celebrating the promulgation of Sacrosanctum Concilium, the Second Vatican Council’s Constitution on Liturgy.

50 years later!  Has it been so long?

Sacrosanctum Concilium, states this about Gregorian chant. The Latin of SC 116 is often rendered as:

The Church acknowledges Gregorian chant as specially suited to the Roman liturgy: therefore, other things being equal, it should be given pride of place in liturgical services.

This isi a weak. To my ear it doesn’t convey the force of the vocabulary which sounds like legal language having to do with property, possession, heredity. This is a powerful declaration about something being a prized possession, even the most prized of all, since it is in the “princeps locus” the “first/chief/most distinguished place”.

So, according to your Fathers of the Second Vatican Council, under Bugninicare

If you want your Gregorian Chant, you can keep your Gregorian Chant. PERIOD.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
10 Comments

50 years ago today: BUGNINICARE!

Today is the 50th anniversary of the promulgation of Sacrosanctum Concilium.

50 years.

FIFTY. YEARS.

I went back into the archives of the blog to find my post about…

Bugninicare!

UNIVERSAL SPIRITUAL-CARE REFORM FOR THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

(Socialized Worship)

Taking his cue from post-war European national health care programs, Annibale Bugnini, assisted by a small circle of spiritual-care specialists and church policy makers, spearheaded a massive overhaul of the Catholic Church’s spiritual care system in the 1960s. The centerpiece of “Bugninicare” was a program known as Novus Ordo, so-called because it introduced a New Order into the regulation of the Church’s worship. The NO regulations were aimed at extending spiritual-care benefits to those for whom active participation was previously thought to be inaccessible. Bugninicare guaranteed that barriers to full participation were removed, thus permitting access to spiritual care on the part of ordinary believers. Bugnini and his consultants were convinced that the costs their programs would exact would not be excessive.

Special guarantees were built in to Bugnini’s socialized spiritual care system to protect the rights of women. The program also reached out to previously disenfranchised sectors of the general population, ensuring that mainline Protestants, Pentecostals and charismatics would no longer be excluded from participation. In fact, Bugninicare so lowered the bar of spiritual care throughout the Church that other obstacles to full participation, stemming from language, education, religion, gender and sexual orientation, were also effectively removed. The goal of equal distribution of spiritual care in the Church was now guaranteed. Novus Ordo was designed by Bugnini as a monopoly, a “single-provider” liturgy that would allow no room for competition from previous forms of spiritual care delivery. In order to ensure that élite types would not be able to opt out of the Novus Ordo, spiritual care decisions in the Church were left to a small circle of bureaucrats, headed by Bugnini.

Images for your contemplation.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxfO7a7_bWs&feature=player_embedded

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , , ,
61 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can choristers receive Communion after Mass?

From a reader:

Our choir is in a loft at the back of the church. [That’s where the choir belongs!] We have always come down after the mass and received the precious host kneeling at the alter rail from deacon or a priest. Our new rector has decided that that is wrong and the choir is required by the “rules” to receive communion in the loft in the middle of trying to sing the communion antiphon and a piece of appropriate communion choral music. [?] I understand that the CDW addressed this with US bishops in a letter around 2004 allowing choir members to receive after mass; I have searched everywhere but could not find it. Can you assist me please?

I am not aware of a 2004 letter of the CDW to the USCCB in which Communion for choristers is clarified.  If someone can dig it up, I’d like to see it.

This, however, is what I gleaned from the GIRM:

86. While the priest is receiving the Sacrament, the Communion chant is begun…The singing is continued for as long as the Sacrament is being administered to the faithful. If, however, there is to be a hymn after Communion, the Communion chant should be ended in a timely manner. Care should be taken that singers, too, can receive Communion with ease [? “ease”?]. (Curetur ut etiam cantores commode communicare possint.)

As far as I know, that is about all we have on this question.   It is vague (which is good).  There is nothing herein that requires the choir members to receive at a specific time.  There is nothing herein that demands that choir members receive in a specific place.

Nor does the Latin say that they should be able to receive “with ease”.  That is what the translator made out of commode, an adverb which is “duly, properly, completely, rightly, well, skilfully, neatly”.  To get “with ease” out of that, you have to cover one eye and tilt your head and squint until the letters blur.

Let’s us practice some mutual enrichment through the provisions of Summorum Pontificum.  

Let’s see if there is help from the Extraordinary Form, which solved problems like these for centuries before the artificially created Ordinary Form was even a thought.

In the Extraordinary Form, it is fairly common for choir members to receive after Mass.  There is a rite for distribution of Communion after Mass which is both reverent and brief.

So, if the Ordinary Form Mass is over, then Mass is over, if those of you in Columbia Heights get my drift.

There is no reason why the Extraordinary Form rite for distribution could not be used after the conclusion of Mass in the Ordinary Form for the benefit of the choristers.  You aren’t mixing the forms or rites.

It would be “commode” to use it.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , , , , ,
19 Comments

Pope Francis: Peace which is not tranquility.

In his daily, non-Magisterial of-the-cuff fervorino Pope Francis said this (remember, the Vatican doesn’t give us everything – they cut it up into little snippets they deem important and thus take everything out of context… I digress):

[…]

“Jesus was full of joy, full of joy,” explained the pontiff, quoting Jesus’ words from Luke’s Gospel when, from the intimacy with his Father, the Lord proclaims “I rejoiced in the Holy Spirit and I praised the Father.”

This “is precisely the internal mystery of Jesus,” stated the Pope, “that relationship with the Father in the Spirit. It is His internal joy, the interior joy that He gives to us.”

“And this joy,” he explained, “is true peace,” which is not static, quiet or tranquil.

[…]

Peace that is not tranquil.

Peace ≠ tranquility.

What ran through my mind is the ineffable quote of Piccarda in the Paradiso:

In His will is our peace.
It is that sea to which all things move,
both what it creates and what nature makes…

E ‘n la sua volontade è nostra pace.  In His will is our peace.

Rest.

Our hearts are restless…

Somehow, peace is … not rest?

Perhaps in this life.

St. Augustine spoke of love as being his “gravity”.  The ancients thought that things had to seek the place to which they were supposed to go and that was their “gravity”, an internal force.  Augustine said: Amor meus pondus meum… My love is my weight.

In this life, so long as we on being drawn to the place of rest, we are at rest, at peace, in the hic et nunc, the here and now… which, as I think of it, are so important in Jesuit spirituality.  When we are on the way in the right direction, we have a peace which is not tranquil because, by being in our groove, our gravity zone, properly attuned, we are in untranquil peace.

Otherwise,… the Pope was just talking off the cuff and said something that, well… who knows….?

Posted in Francis, The Drill | Tagged , , , , , ,
11 Comments

Pope Bouncer

Even as I remind people that, under Pope Francis’ watch, former-Father Greg Reynolds is still excommunicated, we learn that the reigning pontiff once worked as a bouncer.

He is still working as a bouncer.

One of the most important thing that a Pope (bishop… priest) does in and for the Church and God’s people is say “NO!”.  A lot.

As a matter of fact, on the lists of things that Pope’s (bishop’s… priest’s) must do in and for the Church is say “NO!”.  A lot.

In the meantime, I like that he has Wayfarers on.  I need new sunglasses.  I may stick with the Wayfarers but I have my eyes on Persol this time.

Posted in Francis, Lighter fare | Tagged
12 Comments

ADVENT: Ideas for your season of preparation

I have decided to reread Benedict XVI’s third volume of Jesus of Nazareth: The Infancy Narratives.  It is shorter than the other two volumes, but there are riches within.

The Holy Father’s book presents a real defense of the historicity of the infancy narratives.

US hardcover HERE.  Kindle HERE. Unabridged audio HERE. Large print HERE.
UK hardcover HERE. Kindle HERE.  Large print HERE.

Also, for Advent, you might try something I read last year.  I think it is not too late to dig into it.  Try the reflections by a priest who died under the Nazi regime, Fr. Alfred Delp, in the book Advent of the Heart: Seasonal Sermons And Prison Writings 1941-1944. Kindle HERE. UKHERE.   Smart.  Moving.  I used some of this in my ADVENTCAzTs last year.

And, in the spirit of the Church Militant, you might think about toughing up your rosary!  A very cool priest had these made, modeled after the US government issued rosaries… yes, you read that right… government issued rosaries given to combat troops.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
12 Comments

ALERT! A “wine” that perhaps isn’t really wine!

As you know, for the consecration of the Eucharist to be VALID, we must use wine from grapes.  It can be fortified wine, but it must be wine (HERE).

Today I received a link from a reader which I am compelled to bring to your attention:

It’s Not Wine

Syd Abrams spent a quarter century as a lobbyist for the California Wine Institute, monitoring wine-related legislation in 12 western states until he was forced out two years ago, at age 78. All along, he’s also been a partner in eastern Washington’s pioneering, 800-acre Sagemoor Vineyards, the largest independent grape grower in the state.

Looking out for his private interests now, Abrams finds it curious that Washington State’s notoriously slack Liquor Board was letting one particular California producer get away with the enological equivalent of murder. Boxed “wine” from Franzia, specifically. Turns out, it’s not even wine…an affront to legitimate producers, and a violation of the Liquor Board’s own injunction against labeling that misleads consumers.

The phrase in question is Table Wine With Natural Flavorings.” In fact, says Abrams, the contents of the Franzia box should be called “Flavored Wine Product,” which would require Franzia to list the ingredients (including whatever distilled products are used to provide the alcohol content; Abrams doubts that it’s actually wine) and taxed as such. Franzia does provide a nutrition chart that skirts the question.

Meantime, Abrams’ former employers at the Wine Institute and Franzia’s attorneys have successfully lobbied the Liquor Board to ignore its own mandates (to collect taxes, to protect and educate the public etc.). At a recent meeting, the Board’s legal advisor pooh-poohed the argument that Franzia’s labeling was “misleading.” No minutes were kept.

Modest and courtly, Abrams is personally offended. “It’s not wine. It’s not right.”

Contact the author of this article or email tips@seattlest.com with further questions, comments or tips.

I bring this up from concern that, perhaps, in some sacristy somewhere someone might be using some of this stuff.

If there is a DOUBT… JUST DON’T USE IT.

Moral:

We DON’T SCREW AROUND WITH SACRAMENTS.

And, on that note… to all you idiot priests out there who screw around with the FORM of sacraments, such as the FORM of absolution….

KNOCK IT OFF!

If I could, I would hunt you down and make you pay…. er um… instruct you in the proper words of the form.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , ,
3 Comments

Boston church vandalized

Young idiots conducted their own version of the cowardly “knockout” game on a Catholic church in Brighton (Boston), Mass.

From CBS Boston:

Vandals Trash Brighton Church, Destroy Painting Of Pope

BOSTON (CBS) — Police are searching for answers after a Brighton church was vandalized by three teenagers.

Police say sometime between 3 p.m. on November 23 and 11:30 a.m. on Nov. 25, the teens damaged three doors and broke into Our Lady Of Presentation Church on Washington Street.

Residue from two fire extinguishers was found all over the church floors. A portrait of Pope John XXIII was found on the second floor, cut up and defaced with phrases such as “Devil’s Star,” “(Expletive) God” and “Scooby Doo.” [I’ll bet they were misspelled.]

The church organ was destroyed and a gold crucifix was removed from the altar and placed near the front entrance.

An alarm transmitter and a window were also damaged.

Officers found a bag of Tostito chips, a container of Pringles, a bottle of Sprite, a water bottle, and a half empty bottle of Italian wine at the scene.

St. John’s Seminary owns the church and uses the building as a lecture hall and rectory.

[…]

When they are caught, perhaps they should be made to clean up the mess, reimburse the diocese for the repairs through hours of hard, physical labor for which their pay will be garnished, and then – when all is paid for and cleaned up – spend time in the equivalence of the public stocks.

Just an idea.

In the meantime, we will see a lot more of this.

As the Church becomes less clear in her identity in the public square, the attacks will mount.  Soon local and federal officials will start turning a blind eye.  Then there will be draconian crack-downs on clergy and religious for any slight or imagined infraction of “hate-speech” laws.

You know the rest.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
21 Comments

Another evil attack on the Church and religious freedom in these USA

One can understand that a person might be slightly deranged because of sorrow and grief, but this is an evil act.

This is the sort of thing that will occur more and more often.

Michigan woman sues U.S. Catholic bishops over miscarriage treatment

(Reuters) – A Michigan woman has sued the U.S. Catholic bishops, arguing that a Catholic hospital in Michigan denied her adequate treatment during a painful miscarriage because of a policy banning even the discussion of abortion as an option.

Tamesha Means said she went to a Catholic hospital in Muskegon, Michigan, the only hospital within 30 minutes of her home, when her water broke in December 2010 after only 18 weeks of pregnancy, according to the lawsuit filed Friday in Detroit federal court.

Despite her being in excruciating pain and with virtually no chance her pregnancy could survive, Mercy Health Partners told Means there was nothing it could do and did not tell Means that terminating her pregnancy was an option and the safest course for her condition, the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit accuses the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops of creating health care directives “that cause pregnant women who are suffering from a miscarriage to be denied appropriate medical care, including information about their condition and treatment options.”

About 15 percent of the 800,000 beds in the U.S. are in a Catholic hospital, according to the Catholic Health Association. [Sr. Carol Keehan and the CHA gave cover to catholic politicians to vote for Obamacare, the “AFFORDABLE” Care Act.  Obamacare will result in the devastation of swaths of the economy and Catholic health providers.  Sr. Keehan… GIVE BACK THAT PEN!] In those hospitals, medical professionals must comply with the bishops’ directives, which prohibit suggesting or performing abortions.

[…]

The American Civil Liberties Union is representing Means in the lawsuit.  [Isn’t that ironic?  Who cares about the civil liberties of CATHOLICS? Not the ACLU.]

[…]

What is the solution?

Is it time to close every Catholic hospital?

Another take from another liberal news source, MSNBC.  Alas, it says that this may be the first case of its kind.  And it shows that the ACLU has been trying to stick it to the Catholic Church in a related way in Colorado.

UPDATE:

A priest wrote to me.  I will anonymize it so that he isn’t targeted and threatened:

I’m the pastor at ___, MI. During the summer, the Muskegon County Health Dept. and the Michigan ACLU had a conference at Muskegon Community College to inform women of there reproductive healthcare “rights” within religiously run institutions.

As soon as I saw the announcement, I said “this is a set-up”, as the only hospitals in Muskegon are Catholic hospitals.

Here’s the proof:

http://www.muskegonhealth.net/news/130710_knowyourrights.pdf

FYI–I saved a copy of the PDF in my iBook app.

Yes, this sure had the smell of “ambulance chaser” didn’t it?

Posted in Liberals, Magisterium of Nuns, Our Catholic Identity, Pò sì jiù, Religious Liberty, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , ,
34 Comments

Pope Francis: former bouncer

Did you see this on the Catholic News Service:

In conversations with parishioners, pope reveals he once was a bouncer

VATICAN CITY (CNS) — In addition to having worked sweeping floors and running tests in a chemical laboratory as a teenager, Pope Francis revealed he also used to work as a bouncer.

No longer kicking troublemakers out of clubs, he has discovered the secret to bringing people back, this time, into the church, according to the Vatican newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, Dec. 2.

[…]

And Australian former-priest Greg Reynolds is still excommunicated.

Posted in Francis, Lighter fare | Tagged ,
11 Comments