QUAERITUR: Can’t attend Sunday Mass. Wherein Fr. Z gives a long, convoluted answer with lots of history and some Latin.

From a reader:

I am currently in attendance at a law enforcement academy in order to become certified as a State Trooper. It runs until January of next year, is a live-in facility, and is structured in a very paramilitary format.
I’ve recently reviewed our schedule and have discovered that we will be having to go to class on certain Saturdays and Sundays in December. I am under the initial impression that no accommodation will be made permitting us to leave for Mass or other Sunday services during those particular weekends. Would I need to request a dispensation under these circumstances? What is the process? I had supposed that in the future, as a Trooper, I would time my break to attend Mass. I am very stressed out about not being able to attend, and plan on speaking with the class’

In the 13th century, Pope Gregory IX had St. Raymond of Penyafort collect important canonical legislation. Building on the important work done a century earlier by Gratian, this collection became known as the Decretals. Gregory’s successors, especially Dante’s nemesis Boniface VIII, added to and revised the Decretals.  These collections were the primary reference source for canon law until the promulgation of the 1917 Code of Canon Law.

There’s more!

Book VI of the Decretals is called the Regulae Iuris (on Wikipedia for your edification and light evening reading), published by the aforementioned Boniface in 1298. Though these 88 Rules are not found explicitly in the current, 1983 Code of Canon Law, they still have significant moral force.  Many of the Rules provide the basis of modern law.

“But Father! But Father!”, you are saying by now….

Hush!

Regulae Iuris 6 states: Nemo potest ad impossibile obligari… No one can be obliged to the impossible.

This principle still applies today.

The Church will not impose a burden on someone that is impossible for that person to fulfill.  If it is impossible for someone to get to Mass on Sunday or a Holy Day of Obligation, the obligation ceases.

It is salubrious for someone who, examining the circumstances, foresees that he will be unable to hear Holy Mass on a day of precept (which includes all Sundays) to approach his pastor for advice and counsel in order to determine if there truly is no reasonable solution.  This pastor may grant a dispensation or a commutation (e.g. altering the obligation to hear Mass on Sunday to some other pious work, such as praying a rosary, or even hearing Mass on some other day) in order to lighten the conscience of the one who will have to miss Mass. Alternatively, the pastor could simply note that, since attendance at Mass is impossible, the obligation is lifted.

Lastly, most police forces have Catholic chaplains.  You could check and see if there is a Catholic chaplain attached to the academy or to the State Police, and seek his input. It is likely that you are not the only person to face this situation.

I made this long and detailed by I have a soft spot for cops.

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , , ,
7 Comments

Help priests in this vale of vale of tears

Think about how hard it is at times to cope with the three great challenges that accompany us as while we still draw breath: the world, the flesh and the Devil.

The Devil and the fallen cohort of Hell hate everyone.  They hate and fear priests with a particular viciousness.

Something must be up in the ongoing invisible battle on the spiritual place. In the last couple weeks, I have noted an uptick in hate-mail and mail which conceals more subtle forms of spiritual and psychological attacks.  At the same time, however, I also have received email from lay people asking about how they can be of greater help to priests, to support them in their ministry.

Red flags are waving.  Perhaps we should move to SpiritDefCon2.

So.  What can people do to help priests?  Here are a few quick and easy things.

  • First and foremost, pray and fast for them.
  • Volunteer to help in the parish.
  • Say “thank you” occasionally.  It isn’t expected, but it helps.

On another track, two organizations need your support.

The first, I have mentioned before: Opus Bono Sacerdotii

They assist priests who are in trouble in different ways.  They need donations to do their work.  I have had contact with someone who benefited from their help.

Also, Justice for Priests and Deacons

I haven’t mentioned them before, but I was recently sent back issues of their newsletter, which I have been perusing.  Justice for Priests and Deacons gives canonical help in situations when clerics have been unjustly treated after an unfounded allegation or whose rights or due process has been denied.  Priests would do well to take a look at the resources at that site.  I am sure they need money, too.

I suggest that you all take a few minutes to scan the sites of both these organizations.

Remember that you are of the Church Militant.  You need your officers, who are slogging along side you and yours.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , , ,
17 Comments

Pres. Obama has made Putin Leader of the Free World

Sometimes it seems that I am living in a Salvador Dali landscape: clocks melting of tables and all that.

Even as I hear about unions turning on the First Gay President over Obamacare, I find an op-ed in today’s Hell’s Bible (aka NY Times) by former KGB colonel and present Leader of the Free World, Vladimir Putin.

I read the op-ed against the backdrop of Syrian dictator Assad, in a politically deft move, saying right on schedule that it was not the Pres. Obama’s resolve for a military solution that moved Charlie Brown’s football down the field, but rather Putin’s and Russia’s involvement. Well-coordinated. Sly.

Here are a couple points from Putin’s op-ed.

A Plea for Caution From Russia
What Putin Has to Say to Americans About Syria

[…]

The potential strike by the United States against Syria, despite strong opposition from many countries and major political and religious leaders, including the pope, … [!]

[…]

My working and personal relationship with President Obama is marked by growing trust. I appreciate this. I carefully studied his address to the nation on Tuesday. And I would rather disagree with a case he made on American exceptionalism, stating that the United States’ policy is “what makes America different. It’s what makes us exceptional.” It is extremely dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptional, whatever the motivation. There are big countries and small countries, rich and poor, those with long democratic traditions and those still finding their way to democracy. [He’s is talking to Obama’s liberal dem base!  But a KGB officer would know how to do that.] Their policies differ, too. We are all different, but when we ask for the Lord’s blessings, we must not forget that God created us equal.

You don’t get to be on the top of the pile in Russia by being either stupid or a nice guy. This was pretty slick.

Putin invokes the Pope.

Putin affirms Obama’s determination to undermine American exceptionalism.

Putin invokes our creator, who “created us equal”, which point Obama has been systematically excluding from his references to the Declaration of Independence.

Pres. Obama has made Putin Leader of the Free World.

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Francis, Liberals, Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, You must be joking! | Tagged , ,
47 Comments

Murder mystery space time continuum ham baseball fire fighter movie

Last night I watched a movie I hadn’t seen in years. I had a couple of good actors and used plot devices that I am into.

The movie: Frequency (2000)
Starring: Denis Quaid and James Caviezel
Device:  Aurora Borealis and Ham Radio

Oh yes, there is also a murder mystery and screwing around with the space time continuum.  Holes in the plot but there were twists and turns that were pretty good.

Denis Quaid was also great in The Rookie, which dealt with baseball in a mainly true story.  And we all remember Caviezel in The Passion of the Christ.

And… the bonus… it was 11 September and the movie had NYC firefighters and cops.

The movie reinforces something which we should all remember:

When you screw around with the time-space continuum, watch out for those unintended consequences!

Posted in Linking Back, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
5 Comments

QUAERITUR: Beautiful, traditional sacramental documents or certificates

Once upon a time sacramental documents were lovely and theologically meaningful.  Now, not so much.

This is from a reader:

I was wondering if you knew of where my fiancé and I could obtain a traditional catholic marriage certificate for our coming wedding. We are not very thrilled about the modern just printed off certificates that they have now.

Anyone?

This could be a cottage industry for some entrepreneur.

I did hunt up this place for First Communion. CLICK the image.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
18 Comments

Must see video about solidarity, friendship.

One of the alert readers here picked this up from Badger Catholic.  I, too, had to share it.

Great message.  (And it involves Guinness!  What’s not to like?)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwndLOKQTDs&feature=player_embedded

Powerful images and sounds.

Marshall McLuhan famously concluded that the “medium is the message”.

If only we could figure out how to harness this medium more effectively.

Some of those Catholics Come Home commercials were pretty good, weren’t they.

Posted in Just Too Cool |
4 Comments

“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema.”

First, pray for Thom Peters’ continued recovery.

The well-known canonist, Thom Peter’s father, has a great post at his place, In The Light Of The Law.  My emphases and comments.

About ‘women’s ordination’, what if Gabriel appeared and said…

Except to offer a quick prayer for the ladies who apparently like playing church the way my daughters liked to play house (you know, it looks sort of real, and participants take it very seriously, but, c’mon, it’s still pretend), my main reaction to the most recent “ordination” of a woman was to yawn. I see no point in trying to explain why, say, these women should take canon law seriously, or what the effects of excommunication really are (or are not, for that matter), for they’ve already declared such concerns irrelevant. Fine.

I pause, though, to comment for observers of such antics that, every time these women boast that they have priestly orders by dint of the orders first ‘conferred’ on a woman by a renegade (male) bishop, they miss a crucial point of John Paul II’s ap. lit. Ordinatio sacerdotalis (1994),the document precluding, forever, the possibility of female priests.

The central assertion in Ordinatio is not, repeat not, sacramental (about the nature of orders) nor even ontological (about the nature of women). It’s ecclesiological (about the nature of the Church). Grasp that, and one has the essence of the thing.

No one disputes that the bishop who first simulated conferral of orders on a woman could himself confer orders, and no one (who’s actually read it) claims that Ordinatio formally addresses the capacity of women to receive orders.

Rather, Ordinatio asserts something about the Church, namely, that “the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women”. Ordinatio is not about orders, nor even about women, it’s about the Church and about what Jesus authorized his Church to do, or not do, with priestly orders in regard to women.  Mind, there might well be sacramental and ontological obstacles to female ordination, [There are… but Dr. Peters point is what we are focused on now like lasers.  … What was it again?] but all we know for sure from Ordinatio is that there are ecclesiological obstacles to women priests. Permanent, insurmountable obstacles.

Think of it this way: If Gabriel himself appeared in fiery splendor above St. Peter’s Basilica and proclaimed “Just so you know, women are ontologically capable of receiving priestly Orders!”, not one jot [nor one tittle] of Ordinatio would have to be changed, why? because Ordinatio is not about women or orders, it’s about the Church. The pope, shielding his eyes, could say to Gabriel, “I’m confused, does this mean that we can ordain women priests after all?” Gabriel would respond [with a face-palm], “No! for Pete’s sake, because Jesus did not give that authority to his Church! Read Ordinatio, people. It’s correctly stated in there.”

Given, by the way, the ecclesiological import of Ordinatio, it’s not hard to see why those acting in disregard of it are threatened precisely with excommunication, in that….oops, sorry, I’m starting to talk canon law again, and as we’ve already been informed, ‘women priests’ just ignore canon law.

What a sad group of deluded people.

They need prayers.

The ones I get far more angry with are the protestant heretics who spit on one of the most sacred rites and realities the Catholic Church has by allowing those fake ceremonies in their churches.  I have written about that HERE without mincing words.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , , , ,
14 Comments

The Presidential, Syrian analogy I’ve been looking for!

American Catholic got it just right.

Obama is Charlie Brown to Putin’s Lucy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-LJ9qLbNJI&feature=player_embedded

Even Linus’s first line is on target for Pres. Obama’s Syrian “red line”: Never jump into a pile of leaves with a wet sucker.

Who would have thought that a year into the second term we would be able to call a former KGB Colonel the Leader of the Free World? What surprises await us in his third term?

Posted in Liberals, Lighter fare, The Coming Storm, The Drill | Tagged
8 Comments

Archbp. Nienstedt’s tough-love comments about the redefinition of marriage

On the site of Legatus Magazine you can read the text of a talk given this year’s Napa Institute by His Excellency Most Reverend John Nienstedt, Archbishop of St. Paul and Minneapolis.  He spoke about the family as the foundation of culture.

He has some tough-love comments for proponents of same-sex “marriage”.

Today, many evil forces have set their sights on the dissolution of marriage and the debasing of family life. Sodomy, abortion, contraception, pornography, the redefinition of marriage, and the denial of objective truth are just some of the forces threatening the stability of our civilization.  The source of these machinations is none other than the Father of Lies.  Satan knows all too well the value that the family contributes to the fabric of a good solid society, as well as the future of God’s work on earth.

This will cause a spittle-flecked nutty or two.

Go read the whole thing.  It is valuable.

Fr. Z kudos for the straight talk.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvH7NBAK89g&feature=player_embedded

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Just Too Cool, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , ,
15 Comments

Fishwrap’s Michael Sean Winters viciously attacks Bp. Paprocki

The National Schismatic Reporter’s Michael Sean Winters continues that non-Catholic site’s onslaught on orthodox bishops.

Here is a sample:

My colleague Brian Roewe reported yesterday on an interview given by Bishop Thomas Paprocki of Springfield, Illinois. There is much that is – how to put this as kindly as possible – jarring about the bishop’s comments. His comparison of the situation of the Church today in America to that of the early Christians in imperial Rome was histrionic to say the least: Whatever one thinks of Obama, he is not Nero or Diocletian. [Indeed.  He is not.  Nero and Diocletian were already living in a pagan culture of death.  Obama is actively promoting the conversion of our nation to a pagan culture of death.] Paprocki’s comments on homosexuality exhibited a fifth grade understanding of the issue. [What did Paprocki really say? “Homosexuality and same sex relationships have been around for centuries. There is nothing new in that. What is new is argument that somehow that it is a good thing and that it somehow should be celebrated rather than it being seen as somehow sinful.”  Is is that MSW thinks that it should be celebrated?] But, what was most alarming were the bishop’s remarks about the sex abuse crisis. Those who criticized the Church’s handling of the issue are dismissed as anti-Catholic bigots. [What did Paprocki really say?  He was was asked about a mendacious and nasty jab at the Catholic Church made on TV by David Letterman, namely, “I am telling you if there is anything kids can’t get enough of it’s a 76-year old virgin. Come on, world youth day, or as the Vatican calls it, a salute to altar boys.”  Paprocki said in reaction to that: “You ask what else could it be other than anti-Catholic bigotry – well, it certainly is that. What else could it be? It certainly is ignorance. Profound ignorance for anyone to make comments like that. For one thing it shows the ignorance of someone who identifies the Catholic Church and, particularly the priesthood, with sexual abuse. Certainly, we have had our unfortunate share of scandals and sin and the church is dealing with that.”  He goes on to say that the Church has addressed the sexual abuse issue well and that there are other institutions that need yet to address it.  In the interview he shifts the interviewer’s proposal that “bigotry” causes such nasty remarks over to “ignorance” as the probable cause.] Many bishops have forthrightly confronted the issue of clergy sex abuse, to be sure. Others, not so much. And the Holy See has so far failed to establish a procedure for removing bishops who do not enforce the canonical norms that have governed the Church’s response since 2002. Bishop Robert Finn is still the Bishop of Kansas City-St. Joseph. Archbishop John Myers is still the Archbishop of Newark. [Remember that MSW defended LA’s former auxiliary Gabino Zavala. “Nothing we learned yesterday, nor anything we are likely to learn in the days ahead, can detract an iota from Bishop Zavala’s record as one of the outstanding bishops in the United States. “]  By refusing to admit any wrong-doing, [?] but sweeping everything under the proverbial rug, [?!? Did he actually do those things?] by blaming the media for its coverage, Paprocki looks like no one so much as the tobacco executives who once insisted that smoking cigarettes had nothing to do with causing cancer. Paprocki is an embarrassment, not to me, but to his brother bishops and his cavalier comments and histrionic casting of aspersions [Look in the mirror.] on everybody else undermines the hard work of those bishops who really have tried to right the wrongs that were done and put the Church on a better path. He is like a character out of an opera – “the gods are against me!” – except, of course, this is not an opera, or even a stage, it is the Church. [Yes, the image of the diva does come to mind.]

Read for yourselves the interview Bp. Paprocki gave.  HERE

Make up your own minds.

Posted in Green Inkers, Liberals, One Man & One Woman, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , , , ,
13 Comments