QUAERITUR: Rattlers in the sanctuary!

CrotalusFrom a reader:

Our priest and I have recently come into a point of contention. While preparing for the Triduum liturgies, he has denied the use of the crotalus on Maundy Thursday, citing that the General Instruction no longer calls for its use.

As you know, in the Gospel of Mark 16 we read about the handling of snakes.  The crotalus is a particularly festive snake, for it has a great rattle (Latin crotalum, a “rattle” or a kind of castanet). Yet… when picking it up and shaking it repeatedly it can become a little testy.  This makes for a somewhat agitated liturgy and a steady decline in the number of altar boys.

When handling the crotalus, I suggest brushing up also on the use of liturgical beretta.

An alternative to the crotalus is the… crotalus, a hand-held gadget which has a ratchet within.  In Italian it can be known onomotpoetically as a raganella.  When rotated it makes a loud ratcheting sound.  These are a sound alternative to sometimes less cooperative snake.

Another instrument for this purpose is a thingie with a little wooden hammer which bangs on a piece of wood mounted on a handle.  Italians call it a “tric troc”.  What that one is called in Latin, I cannot tell.

For Holy Week, the last time bells, or organ, can be rung in the Roman Rite is for the first few words of the Gloria of Holy Thursday.  After the beginning of the Gloria there should be no bells, which produce such cheery sounds.  However, even in the older form of the Roman Rite, there is no clear indication in the rubrics that there should be some other noise-maker to substitute the bells at the elevations and during the procession.

That said, it is a strong and venerable custom that noise-maker such as the crotulus or the “tric troc”, clappers, should be used.

I cannot imagine not using some noise-maker if one is available.  The associations of the sounds with the Triduum are deeply part of the way we Catholics do things.  They set a wholly different tone during the Triduum.

It seems to me that they should always be used, whether the GIRM mentions them or not.  They are not mentioned in the rubrics of the Extraordinary Form either but.. there they are!   For centuries used widely in many cultures.   Furthermore, this would be a good and easily example of how you might foster that “mutual enrichment” desired by the Holy Father.

And there is always the liturgical beretta.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
33 Comments

Dumb liberal idea #3464 = Reason #583739 for Summorum Pontificum: Removing Holy Water during Lent

If there are any priests out there who remove Holy Water from the stoops in church for Lent…

KNOCK IT OFF!

And if you, dear readers, go into a church and you see this idiocy… for the love of God, DON’T bless yourself with SAND.

We get the powerful theology of its use in the older Rituale Romanum in the prayers for exorcism of the water and salt used and then the blessing itself.  I wrote about this in an article for the WDTPRS series and it is on this blog.

The rite of blessing holy water, in the older ritual, is powerful stuff.  It sounds odd, nearly foreign to our modern ears, especially after over 30 years of being force fed ICEL pabulum.

You are a soldier and pilgrim in a dangerous world.  What is Lent for? Spiritual discipline and war, right?

So why… why… why would these dopey liturgists and priests REMOVE a tool of spiritual warfare precisely during the season of LENT when we need it the most??

Holy Water is a power weapon of the spiritual life against the attacks of the devil.

Holy water is a sacramental.

It is not a toy, or something to be abstained from, like chocolate …. which is the stuff of a childish Lent.

Holy Water is not to be removed from fonts until after the Mass on Holy Thursday.

This is a response from the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments about this question. Enjoy.

The emphases are mine:

Prot. N. 569/00/L

March 14, 2000

Dear Father:

This Congregation for Divine Worship has received your letter sent by fax in which you ask whether it is in accord with liturgical law to remove the Holy Water from the fonts for the duration of the season of Lent.

This Dicastery is able to respond that the removing of Holy Water from the fonts during the season of Lent is not permitted, in particular, for two reasons:

1. The liturgical legislation in force does not foresee this innovation, which in addition to being praeter legem is contrary to a balanced understanding of the season of Lent, which though truly being a season of penance, is also a season rich in the symbolism of water and baptism, constantly evoked in liturgical texts.

2. The encouragement of the Church that the faithful avail themselves frequently of the [sic] of her sacraments and sacramentals is to be understood to apply also to the season of Lent. The “fast” and “abstinence” which the faithful embrace in this season does not extend to abstaining from the sacraments or sacramentals of the Church. The practice of the Church has been to empty the Holy Water fonts on the days of the Sacred Triduum in preparation of the blessing of the water at the Easter Vigil, and it corresponds to those days on which the Eucharist is not celebrated (i.e., Good Friday and Holy Saturday).

Hoping that this resolves the question and with every good wish and kind regard, I am,

Sincerely yours in Christ,
[signed]
Mons. Mario Marini [Later, the Secretary of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, now with God.]
Undersecretary

I suggest little beach chairs made from toothpicks and a drink umbrella would look good in there…. maybe a golf ball?

Some fast sprouting beans and a little water when no one is looking?

Dear readers:

Have sand in your fonts? How about some photos!?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
81 Comments

WDTPRS – Ash Wednesday (2002MR) – BATTLE!

The Roman Station for Ash Wednesday is Santa Sabina on the Aventine Hill.

The Collect in the 2002 Missale Romanum, is an ancient prayer found in the Gelasian Sacramentary for the Vigil of Pentecost.

It is also among the prayers for the 4th day of the 4th month, which more than likely involved the traditional fast of the fourth month (there were fasts in the 4th, 7th and 10th months).  This prayer is in the so-called Veronese Sacramentary under the title In ieiunio quarti mensis.

This prayer was in the 1962 Missale Romanum but at the end of the section for the blessing of and imposition of ashes, before the Introit of the Mass itself.

Let’s see what the prayer really says.

COLLECT:
Concede nobis, Domine, praesidia militiae christianae
sanctis inchoare ieiuniis,
ut, contra spiritales nequitias pugnaturi,
continentiae muniamur auxiliis.

Praesidium has a military connotation.  It means fundamentally “defense, protection, help, aid, assistance” and thus it refers to “soldiers who are to serve as a guard”.  Thus, by extension, it comes to mean “any place occupied by troops, as a hill, a camp, etc.; a post, station, entrenchment, fortification, camp”.  Munio is equally military: “to build a wall around, to defend with a wall, to fortify, defend, protect, secure, put in a state of defense”.  As you can imagine pugno, “to combat, give battle, engage, contend”, is a military term.  Are you getting the picture?  Of course auxillium means “help, aid, assistance, support, succor”, but when in the plural it is also “auxiliary troops, auxiliaries (mostly composed of allies and light-armed troops; hence opposed to the legions)”.  Then there is militia, which is “military service, warfare, war” and also specifically in the genitive militiae “in military service, or on a campaign, in the field”.

LITERAL TRANSLATION:
Grant us, O Lord, to commence the defenses of the Christian field campaign by means of holy fasts,
so that, we who are about to do battle against spiritual negligences,
may be fortified by the support of continence.

This is a mighty prayer.

Several things come to mind.

First, most of us when we were confirmed were reminded in some way that we are soldiers in this pilgrim Church.  We must be ready to suffer for the Faith.

Militaristic imagery informs much of the history of Christian spirituality.

Next, while we are soldiers we are on the march, pilgrim soldiers.  We are on campaign.  When the Roman legions were on the march, they would build a fortified camp when they halted.  They took no chances.  We are on the march in a vale of tears where anything and everything can happen to us and around us.

Thirdly, when we make mistakes, the results can be deadly.  The word nequitia means “bad quality, badness” but that is because it is “bad moral quality, of all degrees, idleness, negligence, worthlessness, vileness”.  It usually refers to a lack of attention that duty and prudence require, resulting in negative consequences.  Moreover, the virtue of continence is described with the same word used to describe the auxiliary troops that supported the legion’s regulars.  While it could simply refer to “abstinence”, continence is the virtue which restrains the will from consenting to strong impulses of sexual desire.  So, this prayer could have a special focus.

CORRECTED ICEL:
Grant, O Lord, that we may begin with holy fasting
this campaign of Christian service,
so that, as we take up battle against spiritual evils,
we may be armed with weapons of self-restraint
.

LAME-DUCK ICEL:
Father in Heaven,
Protect us in our struggle against evil.
As we begin the discipline of Lent,
make this season holy by our self-denial
.

Posted in LENT |
4 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can religious read their Office with the older books?

From a religious:

When the motu proprio came out in 2007, it gave permission for clerics to use the older breviary to fulfill their obligation. I belong to the OCDS and many of our members wondered if we could pray the older form of the breviary to fulfill our obligation (Morning and Evening Prayer). We inquired with the provincial delegate but he didn’t seem to understand the motu proprio and couldn’t give a clear answer. What do you think?

As you mentioned:

SP Art. 9 § 3. It is lawful for clerics in holy orders to use even the Roman Breviary promulgated by Blessed John XXIII in 1962.

There is nothing ambiguous about that.  If you are a cleric, and you use the older form of the Office, you fulfill your obligation.  That applies to the Roman Breviary.  I suppose it would apply to the Office for religious orders if they have a proper form.

Also,

Art. 3  If Communities of Institutes of Consecrated Life and of Societies of Apostolic Life of either pontifical or diocesan right which in conventual celebration or celebration of the “community” in their own oratories desire to have celebration of Holy Mass according to the edition of the Missale Romanum promulgated in 1962, this is licit for them. If  an individual community or the whole Institute or Society wants to put into effect such celebrations often or habitually or permanently, the matter is to be determined by the Major Superiors according to the norm of law and the particular laws and statutes.

If this is the case for Mass, why would it not be the case for the Office?

If you want a better answer, you might apply to the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei”.

Also, I will now invite members of religious orders who may have some experience with this question to sort things out.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , , ,
7 Comments

QUAERITUR: Confessions during Mass

I had a great conversation with a group of priests last night. The subject of confessions during Mass came up.  I promised to repost information I have previous shared.

The Sacrament of Penance needs to be revived.  Confessions before Masses is a great way to do this.  If there are enough priests available, confessions during Mass is another.

Here is the documentation translated from Latin found in Notitiae 37 (2001 – no. 419-420) pp. 259-260 with my emphases and comments:

Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments (October 2001)

What are the dispositions governing the time for the celebration of the sacrament of Penance? For example, can the faithful have recourse to the sacrament of Penance during Mass?

The principal norms governing the time for the celebration of the sacrament of Penance are to be found in the Instruction Eucharisticum mysterium (25 May 1967), which states: The faithful are to be constantly encouraged to accustom themselves to going to confession outside [And this is very good. People should ideally be focused on the sacred action of Holy Mass when they are at Holy Mass. Also, special effort must be made to see to one’s own spiritual welfare. Moreover, depending on the way it is handled, hearing confessions during Mass might be distracting to some other people.] the celebration of Mass, and especially at the prescribed times. [This is close to one of my 20 Tips! #3] In this way, the sacrament of Penance will be administered calmly and with genuine profit, and will not interfere with active participation inthe Mass (no. 35). The same is reiterated in the Praenotanda of the Ordo Paenitentiae (no. 13), which states that: the reconciliation of penitents can be celebrated at any time and day. [Remember those people who claimed confessions couldn’t be heard during the Sacred Triduum?]

Nevertheless this ought to be understood as a counsel [Not an imperative, that is, that confessions should be heard at scheduled times rather than during Mass.] directed to the pastoral care of the faithful, who ought to be encouraged and helped to seek health of soul in the sacrament of Penance, and have recourse to it, as far as possible outside the place and time of the celebration of Mass. On the other hand, [Here we go…] this does not in any way prohibit priests, except the one who is celebrating Mass, from hearing confessions of the faithful who so desire, including during the celebration of Mass. [There it is, ladies and gentlemen.] Above all nowadays, when the ecclesial significance of sin and the sacrament of Penance is obscured in many people, and the desire to receive the sacrament of Penance has diminished markedly, pastors ought to do all in their power to foster frequent participation by the faithful in this sacrament. [In other words… this sacrament, and the awareness among the faithful of its importance, is really in danger.] Hence canon 986.1 of the Code of Canon law states: All to whom by virtue of office the care of souls is committed,are bound to provide for the hearing of the confessions of the faithful entrusted to them, who reasonably request confession, and they are to provide these faithful with an opportunity to make individual confession on days and at times arranged to suit them.

The celebration of the sacrament of Penance is indeed one of the ministries proper to priests. The Christian faithful, on the one hand, are not only obliged to confess their sins (cf. can. 989), but on the other hand are fully entitled to be assisted by their Pastors from the spiritual riches of the Church, especially by the word of God and the sacraments (can. 213).

Consequently, it is clearly lawful, even during the celebration of Mass, to hear confessions when one foresees that the faithful are going to ask for this ministry. In the case of concelebrations, it is earnestly to be desired that some priests would abstain from concelebrating [One a side note about concelebration, which ought to be safe, legal and rare… there are some priests who are obsessed with concelebration. They nearly impose it on other priests, in violation of their rights or judge priests badly if they choose (as is their right) not to concelebrate. This has happened to me, as a matter of fact, and in a surprising place. Still, I like this advice from the CDW: confession is very important – perhaps some men could hear confessions instead of concelebrating!] so as to be available to attend to the faithful who wish to receive the sacrament of Penance. It should be borne in mind, nevertheless, that it is not permitted to unite the sacrament of Penance with the Mass, making of them both a single liturgical celebration [This is done in the Novus Ordo sometimes with baptisms, for example, or even celebrations of liturgical hours such as vespers.].

Furthermore, in Redemptionis Sacramentum 76 we read:

Furthermore, according to a most ancient tradition of the Roman Church, it is not permissible to unite the Sacrament of Penance to the Mass in such a way that they become a single liturgical celebration. This does not exclude, however, that Priests other than those celebrating or concelebrating the Mass might hear the confessions of the faithful who so desire, even in the same place where Mass is being celebrated, in order to meet the needs of those faithful. This should nevertheless be done in an appropriate manner.

Cf. Pope John Paul II, Apostolic Letter (Motu Proprio), Misericordia Dei, 7 April 2002, n. 2: AAS 94 (2002) p. 455; Cf. Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Response to Dubium: Notitiae 37 (2001) pp. 259-260.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Linking Back, Mail from priests | Tagged , ,
23 Comments

News about the Instruction on Summorum Pontificum

The intrepid Andrea Tornielli has on his blog a note about the upcoming Instruction for Summorum Pontificum.

Here, in my fast translation, is the heart of the matter.

[…]

Above all, the instruction confirms that the Motu Proprio is universal law of the Church and that all are bound to apply it and guarantee that it be appled.  The Instruction affirms that the possibility of celebration in the old rite was assured where ever there are groups of the faithful who request it.  In the text it is not made more precise any minimum numer of the faithful who must constitute the group.

It is said on the other hand that it is good – in accord also with the Post-synodal exotation on the Eucharist – that seminarians study Latin and know celebration according to the old form.  [That exhoration doesn’t, I believe, mention that seminarians should know the old rite, but it does talk about Latin.  So does the 1983 Code of Canon Law… in no uncertain terms.] The “sacerdos idoneus”, for celebration with the pre-Conciliar missal, does not have to be an expert Latinist, but that he know and understand what he is reading and is called to pronounce during the rite.  [This may go a little beyond what a normal interpretation of law suggests.  I will stick with what Card. Egan said and what seems reasonable : since favoribilia ampliantur and odiosa restringenda, it seems that a priest needs to be able to pronounce the texts properly.  It is great if he can do more.]

The Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia ei”, which for two years has been part of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, will be established as an organism called to settle questions and controversies, making judgments in the name of the Pope.

Bishops must not and cannot promulgate norms that restrict the faculty conceeded by the Motu Proprio, nor can they change the conditions.  They are called, instead, to apply it.

The Triduum can also be celebrated in the pre-Conciliar rite where there is a stable group of the faithful bound to the older liturgy.  Members of religious orders can use the Missal in their respective preconciliar rites.

After this, Tornielli, in a paragraph of tortured Italian, describes what is going on with the Ambrosian Rite.  In a nutshell, the Ambrosian Rite is not mentioned.  The Pont. Comm. “Ecclesia Dei” does not have competence over the Ambrosian Rite, instead, the Congregation for Divine Worship does. It is like that the there will be a subsequent move to clarify the situation of the Ambrosian Rite, since it is the Pope’s obvious desire that the faithful have the older rites available if they want them.  In the past, when there have liturgical reforms, the Roman Rite received attention first, and the other rites followed.   That may be the situation here.

If this is the main thrust of the Instruction, we have to say that it is favorable to those who desire an even wider use of the older form of the Roman Rite.  I am sorry for those attached to the Ambrosian Rite, but I suspect something will be done about that too when the reorganization of the Congregation takes place.  Who knows.

Still, this is positive.

I draw your attention to the point about no minimum number of people being required, at least not specified, for there to be a “group”.  This is good.  The less said about numbers, the better.   Also, the matter about the Triduum is positive.  Let there also be the Triduum in the older rite for Catholics who desire to participate, if they can pull it off well.  Why should bishops be troubled with questions like that when they are burdened with far more pressing issues.

The point about priests and seminarians and Latin needs a comment.  When bishops ordain men to the diaconate and priesthood, someone stands up and attests that they are properly trained.  But the Code of Canon Law specifically says that seminarians must be very well-trained in Latin (c. 249).   So, if they aren’t, why are the formators telling bishops that they are well-trained?  These are seminarians and deacons and priests of the LATIN CHURCH and there is a specific canon that covers this point of training.  Furthermore, the Latin Rite has two forms.  Are seminarians well-trained and ready for service if they don’t know their Rite?  Moreover, Sacrosanctum Concilium states that pastors must make sure that their flocks can both sing and speak in both their mother tongue and Latin all the parts which pertain to them.  How does that happen if they themselves have no use fo the Latin language for the Rite which they are bound to celebrate for God’s people?

Okay… I’m finished.

Posted in SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged ,
38 Comments

Australia: Auxiliary bishop writes to Pope, considers resignation, Church too narrow

The Canberra Times has this

Hard times: troubled bishop writes to Pope
BY GRAHAM DOWNIE, RELIGION REPORTER
08 Mar, 2011 08:12 AM

The parlous [“parlous”?  This is somewhat obsolete version of “perilous”.] state of the Catholic Church in Australia led Auxiliary [!] Bishop of Canberra Pat Power [the old gent in the powder-puff blue jumper, above] to write formally [Is there any other way?] to the Pope in November.

No reply has been received and Bishop Power is considering early retirement.

He said yesterday he was disappointed rather than disillusioned with the Church.

The second Vatican Council had given great hope and some wonderful things had happened, he said.

”But in other ways we have retreated into fairly narrow positions. [?] I just think it is a shame the potential we had to be a source of inspiration within the whole community has been diminished.” [Has there been nothing in Australia which contributed to that over the last few years?  Or is that Rome’s fault too?]

Bishop Power had been prompted to write to the Pope, particularly over the parlous [“parlous” again!  It wasn’t a mistake the first time!] state of the Diocese of Wilcannia-Forbes, which has remained without a bishop since the resignation of Bishop Chris Toohey almost two years ago. [And Rome didn’t appoint Bp. Power?]

The diocese, which covers more than half the area of NSW, has 20 parishes and only about 15 priests.

”I maintain that what is happening in Wilcannia-Forbes at the moment is going to progressively become the situation in other Australian dioceses,” Bishop Power said.  [If they can’t find a priest to promote to bishop in all this time…  Hmmm…]

The Archdiocese of Canberra and Goulburn had kept the ship afloat to some extent, with overseas priests. But Bishop Power said he was deeply concerned about the health and morale of its priests. ”I am not saying the morale in the diocese is not good, but it is tested when priests are doing a whole lot more than really they should be asked [So!  Retire early!] .. Part of my role is vicar for clergy. I am genuinely concerned for the health and well-being of our priests.”

Bishop Power will turn 70 next year. ”I am thinking seriously of retirement when I turn 70.” Bishops and priests normally retire at 75. [Wait a minute!  There is a priest shortage but he is thinking about retiring five years earlier than his priests?] On whether he had expected a reply from the Pope to his letter, Bishop Power chuckled and said, ”Normally, when you write a letter, you expect a reply.”

But he took no personal insult that he had not yet received a reply. [The Pope might be busy.  After all these are parlous times.]

The Canberra Times reported in December the archdiocese of Canberra and Goulburn was in difficult financial straits and parish priests were being asked how they intended to rectify the position.

Bishop Power attributes in part the crisis in Australia to undermining of the Church by conservative Catholics reporting to Rome on more liberal developments.

Given the lack of reply to his letter to the Pope, Bishop Power said, ”They are amazingly well connected.” Their views were reflective of the extreme religious right prominent in the US.

Don’t worry, Your Grace, I am sure your formal letter to the Holy Father was forwarded to the Congregation for Bishops.  Even now it rests on a desk in that Congregation’s office for auxiliaries located on sublevel 2 next to the steam pipe trunk distribution venue.

I want to give shout out to the Australian Confraternity of Catholic Clergy, an outstanding group.  These are the sort of priests who would willingly work long after 75 years of age and die, as priests, with their boots on.

I’ll leave the combox open here, though it be parlous to do so.

Don’t be nasty or I’ll suspend your posting ability.

Posted in Picture Me In My Grief | Tagged ,
73 Comments

Monday Supper … and poetry

I am posting a Monday instead of Sunday Supper offering.

We are having a meeting of our literary group, and I am cooking.

We are reading G. M. Hopkins, in a certain phase. We are having “spaghetti al seminario” and a wine tasting as well.

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen, What Fr. Z is up to |
16 Comments

Two “Brick by Brick” notes for your edification

First, may I ask the readership to take about 5, maybe 6, seconds to VOTE for this blog?  Click HERE.

I had great notes from readers.

First, …

St. Benedict’s Chapel in Chesapeake, VA … dedicated their new church this past Saturday (March 5). This is likely the first from-the-ground-up building constructed in the past 30 years specifically to say the TLM. I wrote about the new church with pictures here.

Also, …

In the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph, MO, the Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles have a new home.  They had an open house and photos are posted.

Posted in Brick by Brick |
19 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can I attend SSPX Triduum?

From a reader:

I attend the Extraordinary Form of Mass celebrated each Sunday by a priest of my diocese. This is great and I’m very grateful to be able to receive my liturgical heritage as a Catholic each Sunday. However, there will be no EF services for the Triduum; as far as I know, the bishop has never allowed for such provision for our EF community. My question is, given this situation, could I legitimately attend the SSPX chapel for Holy Thursday, Good Friday and the Easter Vigil?
Obviously I do not intend to rupture communion with my ordinary or with the Holy Father in so doing.

Since the SSPX is not in union with the Successor of Peter, I cannot say that people should attend chapels of the SSPX unless they would otherwise be denied, for one grave reason or another, the opportunity to participate at Holy Mass for a significant period of time.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
Comments Off on QUAERITUR: Can I attend SSPX Triduum?