QUAERITUR: Pilgrimages

From a reader:

Do you lead regular pilgrimages each year? If so, do you post these on your blog so we could also go? My husband and I try to go on pilgrimage once a year. God bless you!

I do not.  This last pilgrimage was the first I have ever done.  It was an interesting experience and I learned a lot from it.

I think I would be open to doing another pilgrimage, under the right conditions.

Pilgrimages are special occasions: all sorts of different people are jumbled together for a little microcosm of life’s overarching pilgrimage through this vale of tears.

 

 

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
11 Comments

IRAN: Christians sentenced with 80 lashes for drinking communion wine

IRAN: Christians sentenced with 80 lashes for drinking communion wineIn North Africa during the reign of Diocletian, at Abitina, a group of 49 Christians were convicted of celebrating Mass.

The local bishop had caved in to Diocletian’s anti-Christian edicts, but some Christians went ahead and worshiped on Sunday with their priest Saturninus.  They were arrested, tortured – including the children – and tried in Carthage. They were sentenced to death.

One of the martyrs, in whose house they were meeting – Emeritus, by name, when challenged about why they violated the Emperor’s edicts, responded “Sine dominico non possumus … We are not able [to live] without the ‘lordly thing'”, meaning without the Eucharist and Its celebration.  In Latin we use adjectives a little differently than in English.  In English we spin out, for example, Dies dominica, the ‘lord-ly day’ or the day having a characteristic pertaining to the Lord, as the Lord’s Day (Sunday).  The Lord’s Prayer is called the Oratio dominica.  Etc.

That was then, with Diocletian.

This is now, with the Religion of Peace.

From FNC:

Iran gives Christians 80 lashes for communion wine as UN blasts human rights record

Four Iranian Christians were reportedly sentenced to 80 lashes for drinking wine for communion, a shocking punishment meted out even as a new United Nations report blasted the Islamic republic for its systematic persecution of non-Muslims.

The four men were sentenced Oct. 6 after being arrested in a house church last December and charged with consuming alcohol in violation of the theocracy’s strict laws, according to Christian Solidarity Worldwide. They were among several Christians punished for their faith in a nation where converting from Islam to Christianity can bring the death penalty. According to a new October UN report by Ahmed Shaheed, UN special rapporteur on human rights in Iran, such persecution is common, despite new President Hasan Rouhani’s pledge to be a moderate.

[…]

The four Christian Iranians sentenced to 80 lashes for violating Iran’s anti-alcohol law have ten days to appeal their verdict.

“The sentences handed down to these members of the Church of Iran effectively criminalize the Christian sacrament of sharing in the Lord’s Supper and constitute an unacceptable infringement on the right to practice faith freely and peaceably,” Mervyn Thomas, chief executive of Christian Solidarity Worldwide, said.

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia, pray for us.

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Our Catholic Identity, Patristiblogging, Religious Liberty, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, The Religion of Peace | Tagged , , , ,
4 Comments

Georgetown U (Jesuits) should be Catholic or lose the title – PETITION

I direct the readership’s attention to an item in the RSS feed of the Cardinal Newman Society which is on the sidebar of this blog.

CNSNews.com Covers Blatty’s Canon Law Petition on Georgetown’s Catholic Identity

CNSNews.com’s managing editor Michael Chapman recently covered the story about the Georgetown University alumni effort (see: Blatty’s Canon Law Case to Reform Georgetown Goes to Vatican) to restore Catholic identity to their once revered alma mater:
Georgetown University alumnus William Peter Blatty, author of the best-selling book The Exorcist and its Academy Award-winning screenplay, both of which take place in Georgetown, has sent a Canon Law petition to Pope Francis, appealing to him to make Georgetown University comply with the basic rules required to be a “Catholic” school.
If Georgetown University refuses to adhere to those rules, as spelled out in the papal document Ex corde Ecclesiae by Pope John Paul II, then its official identity as a “Catholic” university, as a last possible measure, should be removed, says Blatty.
The petition, signed by more than 2,000 people so far, is not a lawsuit but a document that faithful Catholics are allowed to send to the Vatican to make known their concerns and to call upon Church authorities, including the Pope, for help.
You can read the rest of Chapman’s story here, and you can show your support for Blatty’s efforts by clicking here.

You might check out that petition.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The Campus Telephone Pole, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
4 Comments

Errare est humanum.

Here are object lessons to priests and servers who make mistakes. We go one. Don’t lose your cool, move on. Deal with it. Keep moving forward.

I saw a video that most of you have seen by now of James Taylor screwing up the beginning of the Star Spangled Banner. He launched into America The Beautiful first and then, realizing he was off, made the switch and continued. Some people think “fail!”. I don’t. Hey! Mistakes happen. You go on. How you handle screw ups is telling.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jM6mFDZsqIA&feature=player_embedded

With a tip of the biretta to Damien Thompson, at whose page I saw this, you have got to watch this video.

To set the scene piainst Maria Joao Pires is set to play for a lunch concert Amsterdam’s Concertgebouworkest conducted by Riccardo Chailly. She is expecting a different Mozart concerto than the the one the band plays! Surprise!

What to do?

Does she panic? No. Well… a little. But then she works like a pro.

After the relevant part, there is a little more on an irrelevant topic, interesting enough but… not ad rem.

Play video

We little humans make mistakes. Errare est humanum. How we recover and deal with the new situation on the ground is all.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Just Too Cool | Tagged , , ,
11 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can a rector or bishop forbid seminarians or priests use of the cassock?

QUAERITUR: Can a rector or bishop forbid seminarians or priests use of the cassock?From a reader:

In my diocese there are a small number of seminarians who wish to wear their cassock after their first year of study at the seminary. They have approached the bishop and rector about doing so, but both have refused to grant them permission, saying that can only do so after their ordination and that they must wear civilian clothing, much to their distress. I was wondering if either the bishop and/or rector (or both?) have the authority to do this?

Also, in another diocese in my country my priest friend, who has recently started celebrating the Traditional Latin Mass, wishes to wear the cassock but his bishop has refused to allow him to do so, saying he can wear a clerical shirt but anything more than that is ‘over the top’ and would cause him to draw attention to himself. Can a local bishop refuse to allow one of the priests in his diocese to wear a cassock?  [No.]

It matters not a whit if a bishop or a rector has the authority to ban cassocks for seminarians.

The only thing that matters is that they can throw you out of the seminary just because they didn’t like their corn flakes that morning.

Seminarians! LISTEN UP!

If your rector or bishop has a “cassock problem” for seminarians, fine.  Let them be as dim and dopey as they choose to be.

Smile.  Be cordial.  Obey.  Wear civvies.  Check off the days on your calendar.

These liberal ideologues are doomed.  The Biological Solution is as work.  You also have The Bux Protocol in your quivver.

When they pass you along for ordination, they are ordaining their own destruction.

Bide your time.

For priests, however, …

Bishops do not have the authority to ban, by particular law, the use of the cassock.

As the Directory for Priests indicates, the cassock is the norm for clerical garb. Furthermore, can. 284 says that clerics “are to wear suitable ecclesiastical garb according to the norms issued by the conference of bishops and according to legitimate local customs.” In these USA, the bishops conference issued particular norms, which state:

“The National Conference of Catholic Bishops, in accord with the prescriptions of canon 284, hereby decrees that without prejudice to the provisions of canon 288 (which states that permanent deacons are are exempt from these norms, unless particular law established otherwise), clerics are to dress in conformity with their sacred calling.  [That rules out Carmen Miranda fruit hats, but it cannot rule out the cassock.]

In liturgical rites, clerics shall wear the vesture prescribed in the proper liturgical books. Outside liturgical functions, a black suit and Roman collar are the usual attire for priests. The use of the cassock is at the discretion of the cleric.“

“The use of the cassock is at the discretion of the cleric.”

These norms from the US bishops were given the recognitio of the Congregation for Bishops in 1999.  Therefore, in these USA priests wear cassocks at their own discretion. A local bishop cannot, of his own authority, issue contradictory norms. He can advise, cajole, plead, threaten or bribe. He cannot mandate anything to the contrary without explicit approval from the Holy See.

Once, however, the use of the cassock in these USA was not permitted to priests as regular street clothes.  This comes from the time of the Councils of Baltimore and the anti-Catholicism of those days.  Priests used the cassock in the parish, etc., the frock coat on the street.  In these USA it is still not quite yet the custom, I think, to use the cassock as street clothes.  Some younger priests are doing this.  Fine.

But a bishop can’t tell a priest not to wear a cassock.  Of course if they bishop does and priest wear the cassock anyway, the petty and vindictive bishop has a thousand ways to hurt the priest.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, Seminarians and Seminaries | Tagged , , , ,
41 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes

Was there a good point in the sermon you heard for your Sunday Mass of precept?

Let us know what it was.

(Yes, I am indeed trying to get you to listen carefully and remember longer.  I am also aware that in some places the preaching is really bad.  Help people who don’t hear good sermons by sharing good points.)

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
19 Comments

Nice kitty!

The next time you see Felix your house cat line up on something and pounce, picture yourself in the forest with this kitty.

Play video

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
12 Comments

“Let’s go to the movies this afternoon.” Otherwise…

"Let's go to the movies this afternoon." Otherwise...

GO TO CONFESSION!

Fr. Z’s 20 Tips For Making A Good Confession o{]:¬)

We should…

1) …examine our consciences regularly and thoroughly;
2) …wait our turn in line patiently;
3) …come at the time confessions are scheduled, not a few minutes before they are to end;
4) …speak distinctly but never so loudly that we might be overheard;
5) …state our sins clearly and briefly without rambling;
6) …confess all mortal sins in number and kind;
7) …listen carefully to the advice the priest gives;
8) …confess our own sins and not someone else’s;
9) …carefully listen to and remember the penance and be sure to understand it;
10) …use a regular formula for confession so that it is familiar and comfortable;
11) …never be afraid to say something “embarrassing”… just say it;
12) …never worry that the priest thinks we are jerks…. he is usually impressed by our courage;
13) …never fear that the priest will not keep our confession secret… he is bound by the Seal;
14) …never confess “tendencies” or “struggles”… just sins;
15) …never leave the confessional before the priest has finished giving absolution;
16) …memorize an Act of Contrition;
17) …answer the priest’s questions briefly if he asks for a clarification;
18) …ask questions if we can’t understand what he means when he tells us something;
19) …keep in mind that sometimes priests can have bad days just like we do;
20) …remember that priests must go to confession too … they know what we are going through.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, GO TO CONFESSION |
13 Comments

CLOCK CHANGE – EUROPE 26/27 Oct – USA 2/3 NOV

It is “Fall Back” time again today… for European readers.

Change your clocks tonight before going to bed so that you won’t be late for Mass.

Readers in North American (except I think for Alaska) change next week.

This has been a public service announcement.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes |
11 Comments

WDTPRS: Christ the King (1962MR) – “no hugs and fluffy lambs”

Each year Holy Church presents to us the history of salvation, from Creation to the Lord’s Coming (His First and also His Final Coming).  At this time of year, as we move in the Northern Hemisphere into the darkness of autumn and winter, as we head toward the end of the liturgical year, we more and more in the Church’s liturgy consider the Four Last Things: death, judgment, heaven and hell.   This feast reminds us that the Lord Jesus is indeed coming and that He will not come as “friend” or “brother” or “gentle shepherd” with hugs and a fluffy lamb on His shoulders.  He will come as King and our Judge.  The Dies Irae prayed at Requiem Masses identifies Christ as “King of Fearful Majesty” and “Just Judge”.  He is of course a King and Judge of mercy to those who submit themselves to His rule.

What will His coming be like? Not with hugs and fluffy lambs.  Will it be all trumpets and angels with harps and banners?  Consider the description of His Coming in 2 Peter 3: 10-12 (Douay-Rheims):

“But the day of the Lord shall come as a thief, in which the heavens shall pass away with great violence and the elements shall be melted with heat and the earth and the works which are in it shall be burnt up. Seeing then that all these things are to be dissolved, what manner of people ought you to be in holy conversation and godliness? Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of the Lord, by which the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with the burning heat?”

Christ Jesus will judge us all, dear friends, and submit all things to the Father (cf. 1 Cor 15:28).  Having excluded some from His presence, our King, Christ Jesus, will reign in majestic glory with the many who accepted His gifts and thereby merited eternal bliss.

In the post-Conciliar, Novus Ordo calendar, the Solemnity of Christ the King is the last Sunday of the liturgical year, just before Advent begins.  In the traditional Roman calendar it falls on the last Sunday of October.  The feast was established by Pope Pius XI in 1925, as Pius Parsch says in The Church’s Year of Grace, to “renew in the minds and hearts of the faithful the ancient concept of Christ as divine King who, enthroned at the right hand of the Father, will return at the end of time in might and majesty.”  It also falls during October, a month of celebration for Communists, who impose radical atheistic materialism.  The different editions of the Missale Romanum give different emphases to this feast, though both look to the end times and the definitive coming of Christ’s Kingdom.

Since all of the prayers are of relatively modern origin, those for the older, traditional Mass and the Novus Ordo both written in the 20th century, we can dispense this week with abstruse references to 9th century sacramentaries.  I am sure you will miss them.

The change made to the Collect for Christ the King in the Novus Ordo is a good example of the change in theological perspective from the older form of the Roman Rite to the newer.

I want to put the three main orations of the older, traditional Missale Romanum along with those of the so-called Novus Ordo.  We will forsake the Latin this time as well as vocabulary from the never to be neglected Lewis & Short Dictionary.  Since the1973 lame-duck ICEL versions don’t convey what the Latin really says, I will dig into the WDTPRS archive for our own slavishly literal renderings of the prayers.  For the translations of the older prayers, we can use the version in the beautifully bound hand missal from Baronius Press, The Daily Missal and Liturgical Manual (2007).

What is the point of this exercise?  Let’s see what theological changes were made to the feast by the reformers.  How we pray has a reciprocal relationship with what we believe: change the prayer and you change the belief.

OLDER COLLECT (1962MR)
Baronius Press:
Almighty and everlasting God,
who in Thy beloved Son,
the King of the whole world,
hast willed to restore all things,
mercifully grant that all the families of nations
now kept apart by the wound of sin,
may be brought under the sweet yoke of His rule.

In this Collect Christ is King “of the whole world” (Latin: universorum Rex) and the goal is that all nations be brought under His “yoke”, His rule.  The “yoke” from the Latin word iugum, is a symbol of subjugation. The ancient Romans made conquered armies pass under a yoke as a sign of their status.

NEWER COLLECT (2002MR)
LITERAL VERSION:
Almighty eternal God,
who desired to renew all things
in Your beloved Son, the King of the universe,
graciously grant
that the whole of creation, having been freed from servitude,
may zealously serve Your majesty and praise You greatly without end.

The first part of the prayer is the same as the older version, as you can see even from the different translations.  In the second part, however, instead of a reference to “nations”, we hear of “the whole of creation”.  Instead of “nations” being subjected to the King, “creation” is freed from the bondage caused by the Fall and sin.  In the older prayer there is an emphasis on this world, probably because of the rise of atheistic Communism.  In a sense, the older prayer has strong political overtones. The newer prayer has in mind the Prince of this world, the Enemy who dominates material creation until the end times, when Christ will return.  Both prayer have an eschatological vector to them, however.  They both aim at the ultimate triumph of Christ.

OLDER SECRET (1962MR)
Baronius Press:
O Lord, we offer Thee the Victim of man’s redemption:
grant, we beseech Thee, that Jesus Christ Thy Son our Lord,
Whom we are immolating in this sacrifice,
may Himself bestow on all nations the gifts of unity and peace.

Once again we see the emphases on “nations”, meaning not just the Gentiles, or non-Jews, but on the actual nations of the earth.   Furthermore, the Latin has “nations” capitalized, “Gentes”.

NEWER SUPER OBLATA (2002MR)
LITERAL VERSION:
O Lord, offering to You the victim sacrifice of the reconciliation of humanity,
we are praying submissively that Your Son Himself
will grant all peoples the gifts of unity and of peace.

Again, the first part of the prayer is same as the older.  In the Latin there are minor changes, but it is effectively the same.  The second part, however, shows the theological change desired by the snipping and pasting experts of Fr. Bugnini’s Consilium.  In the older prayer there is an explicit appeal to “sacrifice” with also a strong verb “immolate”.  This sacrificial language was removed from the newer prayer.  But this prayer retains the reference “nations” (gentes).

OLDER POSTCOMMUNION (1962MR)
Baronius Press:
We have received the food of immortality and beg, Lord,
that we who are proud to fight under the banner of Christ our King,
may reign with Him for ever in His realm above.


There is clear military imagery and language.  We have a sense from this prayer that we are soldiers of a Militant Church under a great Captain and King.  We have been given food for the march to battle and glory.

NEW POST COMMUNION (2002MR)
LITERAL VERSION:

Having been remodeled according to the nourishment of immortality,
we beseech You, O Lord,
that, we who glory in obeying the mandates of Christ the King of all things,
will be able to live with Him without end in the heavenly kingdom.


The first part of the prayer and the very last part are essentially the same as they were before the Conciliar reform.  The middle part eliminates the military images.  Instead of fighting through the victory and glory in heaven, we “live” (vivere) with Him in the heavenly kingdom.

All in all, it is hard to find fault with the newer prayers for the Solemnity of Christ the King, celebrated at the end of the liturgical year.  The change of placement of the feast and the change of the theology of the prayers probably reflect the soft approach to Communism adopted by Rome in those years, called ostpolitik, a conscious de-emphasis of triumphant language and imagery.  It is as if the writers of the newer prayers did not want to give the impression that Christ was to be accepted as Lord and King by political entities in this earthly existence.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Drill, WDTPRS | Tagged
8 Comments