Bp. Vasa of Santa Rosa about the new, corrected translation

From a reader:

Last night I attended a talk by Santa Rosa Ca Diocese Bishop Vasa. He explained aspects of the new translation with powerpoint presentation help. This was for lay people and quite well attended by mainly older people, but some young families too. The bishop, during his remarks, said at one point that “we priests must read the black and do the red.” Thought you’d like to know that.

He made it clear that he thinks the new translation will help priests (and himself) to have to concentrate again and review texts before Mass so they will not stumble during Mass. He showed examples of changes that he thinks will prod priests to just read what’s is written and do what is stated.

He is no fan of priests doing things their own way. As the new bishop here he has been visiting a lot of the parishes and said he found it “interesting” when priests or others told him, “We do it this way here, Bishop.” We got the feeling he told them in a pastoral way, “not anymore.”

I think he will be very good for this diocese!

WDTPRS kudos to Bp. Vasa!

Does your priest need a reminder to “Say The Black and Do The Red“?

Click HERE.

And the implicit instruction in your gift could be softened if it came with some Mystic Monk Coffee together with the mug.  There are lots of priests out there who need to wake up and smell the Mystic Monk Coffee!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
13 Comments

Common gesture of reverence in unity with… whom?

This again.

From a seminarian somewhere in the depths of Canada comes an excerpt of text from an insert on the new, corrected translation prepared for parish bulletins (my emphases):

“The third change is related to approaching Communion.  As each person approaches the minister to receive Communion he or she is asked to make a simple bow of the head.  This is a sign of reverence in immediate preparation for the act of receiving Communion, which, in Canada, is to be received standing.  This gesture is made only once before receiving Communion.  It is not repeated again when receiving Communion from the chalice. Other personal expressions of piety or devotion, such as profound bows or genuflections are not appropriate.  A common gesture of reverence is desirable to foster the unity of faith which Communion expresses.”

Common gesture of reverence in unity with… whom?

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
Comments Off on Common gesture of reverence in unity with… whom?

Bugninicare, revisited

A friend and I were talking this morning and he brought back to mind something I posted a few years ago.

Given the fact that, as this presidential election cycle revs up and Obamacare is a huge issue, it is opportune to repost this.

Liberals pit the experience of the individual during Mass against the assembly. Most liberals think congregations should be nearly constrained to do everything everyone else does (including what the priest does).

Is it possible that the Novus Ordo lends itself to this more than the TLM, the Extraordinary Form?

Some will argue that it does. Some will argue that it does by intention and design.

Perhaps we need a townhall meeting to discuss this?

BUGNINICARE

UNIVERSAL SPIRITUAL-CARE REFORM FOR THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

(Socialized Worship)

Taking his cue from post-war European national health care programs, Annibale Bugnini, assisted by a small circle of spiritual-care specialists and church policy makers, spearheaded a massive overhaul of the Catholic Church’s spiritual care system in the 1960s. The centerpiece of “Bugninicare” was a program known as Novus Ordo, so-called because it introduced a New Order into the regulation of the Church’s worship. The NO regulations were aimed at extending spiritual-care benefits to those for whom active participation was previously thought to be inaccessible. Bugninicare guaranteed that barriers to full participation were removed, thus permitting access to spiritual care on the part of ordinary believers. Bugnini and his consultants were convinced that the costs their programs would exact would not be excessive.

Special guarantees were built in to Bugnini’s socialized spiritual care system to protect the rights of women. The program also reached out to previously disenfranchised sectors of the general population, ensuring that mainline Protestants, Pentecostals and charismatics would no longer be excluded from participation. In fact, Bugninicare so lowered the bar of spiritual care throughout the Church that other obstacles to full participation, stemming from language, education, religion, gender and sexual orientation, were also effectively removed. The goal of equal distribution of spiritual care in the Church was now guaranteed. Novus Ordo was designed by Bugnini as a monopoly, a “single-provider” liturgy that would allow no room for competition from previous forms of spiritual care delivery. In order to ensure that élite types would not be able to opt out of the Novus Ordo, spiritual care decisions in the Church were left to a small circle of bureaucrats, headed by Bugnini.

He sent some photos.

Posted in Caption Call, Classic Posts, Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, SESSIUNCULA, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill, Wherein Fr. Z Rants |
27 Comments

“The best catechesis on the Eucharist is the Eucharist itself, celebrated well.”

Let me give you a couple hooks.

When we talk about “the Eucharist” we must keep in mind always that we are talking not only about the Blessed Sacrament, but also the celebration of the Blessed Sacrament.

Also, the Church is all about communication.  God communicates His life to us through the mediation of the Church.  The Church mediates the Gospel to her members (ad intra) and to the world (ad extra).  The Incarnation is communication.  Christ, the Incarnate Word, is the Perfect Communicator (Communio et Progressio, 11).

That said.

I just read another great offering by Leroy Huizenga on the site of First Things.  Be sure to go read the whole thing there.

A key point:

As a new Catholic, I’m beginning to wonder if the way we receive the Eucharist at Mass has served to undercut our particularly Catholic understanding of the Eucharist. Lex orandi lex credendi, after all.

Indeed. The way we worship has a reciprocal relationship with what we believe.  Change how we pray and we change what we believe.. and their other way round.

The Church’s most perfect form of communication with her members and the world is her liturgical worship.

The concluding paragraph:

Given what Catholics believe about the Eucharist, reverence matters, for God’s sake and our own. In any event the Catechism makes clear that the liturgy is “the privileged place for catechizing the People of God”. Indeed, Pope Benedict emphasized in Sacramentum Caritatis 64 that “the best catechesis on the Eucharist is the Eucharist itself, celebrated well.” It’s God, after all.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , ,
17 Comments

The Holy Father’s sermon at Mass in Freiburg im Breisgau

The Holy Father’s sermon at Freiburg im Breisgau:

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

It is moving for me to be here once again to celebrate this Eucharist, this Thanksgiving, with so many people from different parts of Germany and the neighbouring countries. We offer our thanks above all to God, in whom we live and move. [and have our being.] But I would also like to thank all of you for your prayers that the Successor of Peter may continue to carry out his ministry with joy and faithful hope, and that he may strengthen his brothers in faith[This, in Germany.]

“Father, you show your almighty power in your mercy and forgiveness”, as we said in today’s Collect. In the first reading we heard how God manifested the power of his mercy in the history of Israel. The experience of the Babylonian Exile caused the people to fall into a crisis of faith: Why did this calamity happen? Perhaps God was not truly powerful?  [Did he just compare the situation in secularized modern Europe, in Germany, to the Babylonian Captivity?]

There are theologians who, in the face of all the terrible things that happen in the world today, say that God cannot be all-powerful. [In which case God would not be God.] In response to this we profess God, the all-powerful Creator of heaven and earth. We are glad and thankful that God is all-powerful. [Some people fear the loss of self-control and self-determination in the face of the affirmation that God is Almighty.] At the same time, we have to be aware that he exercises his power differently from the way we normally do. He has placed a limit on his power, by recognizing the freedom of his creatures. We are glad and thankful for the gift of freedom. However, when we see the terrible things that happen as a result of it, we are frightened. Let us put our trust in God, whose power manifests itself above all in mercy and forgiveness. Let us be certain, dear faithful, that God desires the salvation of his people. He desires our salvation. He is always close to us, especially in times of danger and radical change, his heart aches for us and he reaches out to us. We need to open ourselves to him so that the power of his mercy can touch our hearts. We have to be ready to abandon evil, to raise ourselves from indifference and make room for his word. God respects our freedom. He does not constrain us[Remember his inaugural sermon in 2005?  Remember his call never the be afraid to give oneself over to Christ?  That we lose nothing of our freedom?]

In the Gospel Jesus takes up this fundamental theme of prophetic preaching. He recounts the parable of the two sons invited by their father to work in the vineyard. The first son responded: “‘I will not go’, but afterward he repented and went.” Instead the other son said to the father: “‘I go, sir,’ but did not go.” When asked by Jesus which of the two sons did the father’s will, those listening respond: “the first” (Mt 21:29-31). The message of the parable is clear: it is not words that matter, but deeds, deeds of conversion and faith. Jesus directs this message to the chief priests and elders of the people, that is, to the experts of religion for the people of Israel. [Is Benedict redirecting it to the priests and elders of the Church?] At first they say “yes” to God’s will, but their piety becomes routine and God no longer matters to them. For this reason they find the message of John the Baptist and the message of Jesus disturbing. The Lord concludes his parable with harsh words: “Truly, the tax collectors and the harlots go into the Kingdom of God before you. For John came to you in the way of righteousness, and you did not believe him, but the tax collectors and the harlots believed him, and even when you saw it, you did not afterward repent and believe him” (Mt 21:32). [NB:] Translated into the language of our time, this statement might sound something like this: agnostics, who are constantly exercised by the question of God, those who long for a pure heart but suffer on account of our sin, are closer to the Kingdom of God than believers whose life of faith is “routine” and who regard the Church merely as an institution, without letting their hearts be touched by faith[If, on the one hand, secularists can be criticized by the Church, the experience of some outside the Church may be even a rebuke to those within who are not living their Faith in an authentic way.]

The words of Jesus should make us all pause, in fact they should disturb us. However, this is by no means to suggest that everyone who lives in the Church and works for her should be considered far from Jesus and the Kingdom of God. Absolutely not! On the contrary, this is a time to offer a word of profound gratitude to the many co-workers, employees and volunteers, without whom life in the parishes and in the entire Church would be hard to imagine. The Church in Germany has many social and charitable institutions through which the love of neighbour is practised in ways that bring social benefits and reach to the ends of the earth. I would like to express my gratitude and appreciation to all those working in Caritas Germany and in other church organizations who give their time and effort generously in voluntary service to the Church. In the first place, such service requires objective and professional expertise. But in the spirit of Jesus’ teaching something more is needed – an open heart that allows itself to be touched by the love of Christ, and thus gives to our neighbour, who needs us, something more than a technical service: it gives love, in which the other person is able to see Christ, the loving God. So let us ask ourselves, how is my personal relationship with God: in prayer, in participation at Sunday Mass, in exploring my faith through meditation on sacred Scripture and study of the Catechism of the Catholic Church? Dear friends, in the last analysis, the renewal of the Church will only come about through openness to conversion and through renewed faith.  [cf. Deus caritas est.]

The Gospel for this Sunday speaks of two sons, but behind them, in a mysterious way, there is a third son. The first son says “no,” but does the father’s will. The second son says “yes,” but does not do what he was asked. The third son both says “yes” and does what he was asked. This third son is the Only-begotten Son of God, Jesus Christ, who has gathered us all here. Jesus, on entering the world, said: “Lo, I have come to do thy will, O God” (Heb 10:7). He not only said “yes”, he acted on it. As the Christological hymn from the second reading says: “Though he was in the form of God, [Jesus] did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on a Cross” (Phil. 2: 6-8). In humility and obedience, Jesus fulfilled the will of the Father and by dying on the Cross for his brothers and sisters, he saved us from our pride and obstinacy. Let us thank him for his sacrifice, let us bend our knees before his name and proclaim together with the disciples of the first generation: “Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father” (Phil 2:11).  [Let us bend our knees in receiving Him in Communion!]

The Christian life must continually measure itself by Christ: “Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus” (Phil 2:5), as Saint Paul says in the introduction to the Christological hymn. A few verses before, he exhorts his readers: “So if there is any encouragement in Christ, any incentive of love, any participation in the Spirit, any affection and sympathy, complete my joy by being of the same mind, having the same love, being in full accord and of one mind” (Phil 2:1-2). Just as Christ was totally united to the Father and obedient to him, so too the disciples must obey God and be of one mind among themselves. Dear friends, with Paul I dare to exhort you: complete my joy by being firmly united in Christ. The Church in Germany will overcome the great challenges of the present and future, and it will remain a leaven in society, if the priests, consecrated men and women, and the lay faithful, in fidelity to their respective vocations, work together in unity, if the parishes, communities, and movements support and enrich each other, if the baptized and confirmed, in union with their bishop, lift high the torch of untarnished faith and allow it to enlighten their abundant knowledge and skills. The Church in Germany will continue to be a blessing for the entire Catholic world: if she remains faithfully united with the Successors of Saint Peter and the Apostles, if she fosters cooperation in various ways with mission countries and allows herself to be “infected” by the joy that marks the faith of these young Churches.

To his exhortation to unity, Paul adds a call to humility: “Do nothing from selfishness or conceit, but in humility count others better than yourselves. Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others” (Phil 2:3-4). Christian life is a life for others: existing for others, humble service of neighbour and of the common good. Dear friends, humility is a virtue that does not enjoy great esteem today. But the Lord’s disciples know that this virtue is, so to speak, the oil that makes the process of dialogue fruitful, cooperation simple and unity sincere. The Latin word for humility, humilitas, is derived from humus and indicates closeness to the earth. Those who are humble stand with their two feet on the ground, but above all they listen to Christ, the Word of God, who ceaselessly renews the Church and each of her members.

Let us ask God for the courage and the humility to walk the path of faith, to draw from the riches of his mercy, and to fix our gaze on Christ, the Word, who makes all things new and is for us “the way, the truth, and the life” (Jn 14:6): he is our future. Amen.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , , ,
3 Comments

Paolo Rodari interprets Benedict XVI’s State Visit to Germany

Paolo Rodari has an interesting analysis of the Holy Father’s visit to Germany.  I am still think about what he wrote, but I thought I would get it out to the anglophone blogosphere for your opportune knowledge.

My quick translation.

Hitler and Luther.  National Socialism and Protestantism. The Pope’s journey, just concluded, had at its foundation these two great faults of the German world.

The Pope, as a Catholic and as a German, senses these two faults as his own, but the attempt that he made in this trip, it seems to me, was to show them as possible for all.

The Pope’s call to the West that it return to a recognition of God as origin and its very life, is decisive in him precisely because of that “reign of terror” with which he had to coexist: “National Socialism”, which “grounded itself on a racist myth, part of which was the rejection of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of Jesus Christ and of all who believe in Him”, the Pope said in Germany.

And then there is the fault of Protestantism, also deeply German fault.  It isn’t that Benedict XVI scorns the Protestant world, on the contrary.  It’s that there is in him the wound of Luther’s tearing, Christianity divided from his own country that hasn’t been able to remain in the Church in spite of its countless problems and its  countless contradictions.

The sense of the trip to Germany, in my opinion, rests here, in these two faults which the Pope wanted in some way to expiate and, at the same time, show as faults possible for everyone.

Intriguing proposal.  I wonder if he is right.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Pope of Christian Unity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , ,
3 Comments

“RETREEEEEAT!” Surrendering the Arsenal of the West! We need Latin!

I am always dismayed when I see that a new bishop dumbs-down his coat-of-arms, or stemma as it is called in Italian, with a modern language motto.  Of course I and some jocular priest friends suggested some less-often-considered mottos here.

Any time there is a total abandonment of Latin for English bad things happen.

From the Daily Telegraph:

Arsenal’s new motto – another blow to Western civilisation

By Harry Mount

Hot on the heels of the BBC’s banal replacement of BC with BCE comes another sad corporate binning of history.

As an Arsenal fan, it pains me to say it, but they too have joined the anti-history club. This season, to celebrate the club’s 125th anniversary, they have commissioned a new crest; as I noticed playing football with my 10-year-old nephew, Tommy, yesterday. Looking at his replica shirt, I saw that, horror of horrors, rather than using Arsenal’s wonderful old motto (“Victoria Concordia Crescit“) they have gone for the dull, Blairite platitude, “Forward”.

As the picture above shows, they try to justify the new motto by saying “Forward” is “one of the first recorded mottos related to armament and battle”. It’s also one of the dreariest and emptiest.

[..]

The only consolation I can think of is that Spurs, our arch-rivals, might also be persuaded to drop their Latin motto – “Audere est facere” (“To dare is to do”) – and change it simply to “Backward”.

I don’t have a preference for any team across the pond, but I am tempted now to cheer against Arsenal and any other team that rejects Latin.

I think I saw the Arsenal stadium.  Is it possible I passed by it when leaving Kings Cross by train for Letchworth, where Fr. Fortescue’s parish was/is?

Posted in Global Killer Asteroid Questions, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , , ,
33 Comments

I just don’t get it. Do they hate what they claim to want to be?

Over at Coo-ees In The Cloister:

Look at this photo.  What does it say to you?  What questions come to mind as you look at the way these people are dressed, at the signs they are holding?

Is there any dissonance here?  This is Anglican, but it is perfectly applicable to the Catholic angle as well.

This reminds me of a parade in San Francisco.

If you and I wanted to make fun of the idea of women bishops, could we beat this?

The way they behave suggests that they are mocking the institution to which they demand admission.

At the end of the day, their idea of hierarchy and church resembles the Metropolitan Community Church rather than the Holy Catholic Church.

As mentioned, above, I think these are Anglicans in the photo.  But this is hardly different from what some Catholic women do.  They claim to be or want to be Catholic bishops.  But, in almost every instance of some wymyn pryyst protest, do you ever get these sense that they either understand what a bishop is or respect what a bishop is?

Over at the blog where I found this photo, they have reference to the Biological Solution view of what these oldsters are up to.  Fine.  They are right to do so.  But let’s open up another front.

There is something of the post-modern affirmation/negation thing going on here.  They want to belong to it and, at the same time, they want to destroy it.

Posted in Lighter fare, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , ,
45 Comments

From The Catholic League: SINEAD O’CONNOR—”KILL THE POPE”

From The Catholic League:

SINEAD O’CONNOR—”KILL THE POPE”

Irish singer Sinead O’Connor is warning Pope Benedict XVI not to come to Ireland, and if he does, she wants him shot. She warned on Twitter there will be a “f***in bloodbath” if the pope visits Ireland.

Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments on her outburst:

Sinead O’Connor has a long history of Catholic bashing, so in one sense her latest foray is not unusual. What’s new, however, is her advocacy of violence. Given her precarious condition, it is not likely she could shoot straight, but her violent appeal may trigger others to act. That is the danger.

O’Connor is not doing well. The cops were recently summoned to her home after she Tweeted about suicide. She needs long-term help. In the meantime, whatever family or friends she has would do well to get her to ramp down her rhetoric and at least pretend to be normal.

I don’t know about Irish law, but …

I understand that this deeply disturbed woman spent some time in a “Magdalen Asylum”.  Weren’t there instances of sexual abuse of children by women religious reported?  I may be wrong.

Posted in New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, Throwing a Nutty |
18 Comments

RECENT POSTS OF INTEREST

Here are some recent posts of interest.

First, thank you to all the readers who have sent donations and items from my wishlist. I have an open Mass intention on Saturday and will say Mass for the intentions of you kind benefactors.

Here are some recent posts which are scrolling along as I add more.


Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on RECENT POSTS OF INTEREST