NOTE TO READERS and FRIENDS

I think I am not getting all my email.  And even the email I am getting is overwhelming. Just an FYI.

Second, among the emails I am getting right now are requests from people to help me write letters to their bishops and their priests, etc., about a range of issues.  I can’t do that.  I have provided some common-sense tips about writing to Church authorities here.

And here are a couple tips for writing to me.

Also, people are curious as to why I write about some things, but I don’t write about others.   Sometimes it is a matter of whim.  Sometimes I don’t think it is useful to feed the media attention.   Sometimes I get busy and forget.  It’s a mystery.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on NOTE TO READERS and FRIENDS

Canceling Mass because of the Super Bowl

A reader alerted me to the following from northwestern.com of Oshkosh, WI… which Google maps informs me is less than an hour south by car from Lambeau Field… Green Bay, WI.

This is from the first part of a letter to the editor:

On Friday I found this notice posted on a door at my parish: “Super Bowl, Sunday (February 6, 2011), No 6:30 p.m. Mass. (Because our Green Bay Packers are in this year’s Super Bowl, we have cancelled the 6:30 p.m. Sunday Night Mass that night. We assume that most would be in agreement … (unless you are a Chicago Bear fan).”

Catholics who do not take their Faith seriously will not object to the above notice. But to those who believe that we should place the Mass above any worldly pursuit like watching a football game, it is an insult.

[…]

Okay.  Let me play devil’s advocate here and argue the other position.

Is that the only Mass on Sunday at that parish?  The parish is certainly not canceling all its Sunday Masses because of the Super Bowl.

Get a grip.  People can go to Mass on Sunday.

People who can’t make adjustments for something that is as important as Mass are not blameless in this.

Besides, who says evening Masses are good?

Mass in the evening was never the Church’s tradition.  Until just a very short time ago, Mass in the evening was hard to imagine.  In view of the Church’s tradition this is something very new and the jury is still out.  Well… it’s out for some.

Sure, for some who work late Masses are good as “last chance” Masses.  But still… is that good?

The writer was worried that football was being placed ahead of Mass.

If people are working, aren’t they placing work before Mass?  If they want to have the whole day to themselves and go to a late Mass on Sunday, aren’t they putting everything else before Mass?

I am bringing these things up to put it all in perspective.  I don’t have a dog in this hunt.  I’m from Minnesota.  Moreover, I have my devil’s advocate horns on right now.

Also, I would rather people stay at home and watch the game rather than come to Mass with their hand helds and radios etc., listening to the game during Mass.  That would be a real insult.

Another point: considering that there may be just a little alcohol involved among the fair denizens of Oshkosh that day – weren’t there ‘overalls’ by that name? –  and the roads may therefore be a little sporty perhaps it is a good idea that Mass at that time was canceled! As a matter of fact it is an act of pastoral solicitude!

Finally, if the Packers lose I am sure that Father will ring the funeral toll in the bell tower, set up the catafalque with the helmet on it and put on his black vestments, the one with the little Gs.   All still able to stand will rush to the church for the exsequies.

Solution to the Mass cancellation?   Go to Church in the morning.  Can’t do that?  Go Saturday night.  Can’t do that?  Go to another parish.  Can’t do that?  Your are relieved of your obligation.  The priest who canceled the Mass can sort things out with God.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
77 Comments

PIQUA, OHIO & ENVIRONS – ALERT! ALERT!

Read this.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on PIQUA, OHIO & ENVIRONS – ALERT! ALERT!

QUAERITUR: Does a parish priest have to ask permission of a bishop to allow marriages in the Extraordinary Form?

From a priest:

I am a priest almost 3 yrs ordained last year I was asked to officiate at a wedding which was to be conducted according to the 1962 missal. The PP would not allow the wedding to go ahead unless I had the bishops permission to do so. What is the deal here re: Summorum? Doesn’t the PP grant permission? It seemed that the PP didn’t want to step on the bishop’s toes and abdicated responsibility. I wrote to the Vicar General who “gave” me “permission” for a once off celebration. All in all it still seems like we are working under Ecclesia Dei.

It is amazing how many people who had no interest in implementing Ecclesia Dei adflicta when it was in force, are now eager to enforce it now that Summorum Pontificum superseded it.

The P.P. (parish priest, pastor) there has the right to allow priests to perform weddings at his parish.  He can and should permit them also in the Extraordinary Form. In Summorum Pontificum 5 § 3 he is urged to do so in rather direct language.

The pastor really ought to let visiting priests do marriages under normal circumstances, but he doesn’t have to.  If the pastor wishes he can ask a visiting priest to arm-wrestle, walk on coals, or fetch from its cave on the mountain by the sea the Holy Handgrenade of AntiochHoly Handgrenade of Antioch to prove his worthiness.  All of these are stupid ideas, of course.  Unless there are some circumstances none of us understand in the background, so is asking the bishop for permission.   He wouldn’t do so for an wedding in the Ordinary Form.  It is entirely unnecessary.   The parish priest makes these decisions without bothering the bishop.  As a matter of fact, the bishop would get annoyed rather swiftly were priests to badger him constantly about visiting priests and weddings.

Of course a diocese might have particular law about any priest from outside doing anything.  That must be taken into consideration.  But in general a visiting priest for a wedding is a routine matter and a double standard shouldn’t be applied simply because it is Extraordinary Form.  A double standard is not to be applied: that’s the point of Summorum Pontificum.

Remember: to use the Extraordinary Form for a marriage, according to the provisions of Summorum Pontificum, no permission from the bishop is necessary.  And the Motu Proprio is entirely silent about the Vicar General.

That said, I will repeat… there may be circumstances at work in that parish that we don’t know about.  In that case consultation with the bishop could be a good idea.  But under normal circumstances, no permission is necessary.

Summorurum Pontificum says:

5 § 3.  Let the pastor permit to the faithful or priests requesting it, celebrations in this extraordinary form also in particular circumstances as are marriages, funerals, or celebratory occasions, for example, pilgrimages.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Mail from priests, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged ,
14 Comments

QUAERITUR: Is a Communion rail obligatory for TLMs?

From a reader:

I am interested in seeing the EF come to my local parish. The main
church is a monstrosity, but there is a separate chapel that might do
nicely.

Unfortunately, there is no altar rail in the chapel. Is the rail
indispensable? I have seen some churches line up a few prie-dieux
where there is no rail. Is that ok?

While we’re at is, how about steps in front of the altar? Are they
necessary? I know this discussion isn’t ideal, but it seems important to know when a paucity of bricks warrants throwing in the towel.

Throw in the towel?  Tut! Tut!  By Grabthar’s Hammer!  A strong confirmed Catholic like you with this sort of talk?  Never give up!  Never surrender!

That said, an altar rail is not a requirement.  I refer you to Mass on the hoods of Jeeps near battlefields.

Think of how much more beautiful your ugly church will seem once there is liturgical worship worthy of the name therein?

Lining up kneelers can work.  I have seen that done far and wide.   It is a good idea to provide something.  It is of particular help to communicants carrying the burden of a certain number of years.

Go for it!  Overcome those obstacles!  Line up those kneelers and have at!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Brick by Brick | Tagged
16 Comments

I foresee big things for this kid.

During the Wednesday General Audience a little boy just decided to go up and see the Pope.

Sinite parvulos!

[wp_youtube]IUgAB_5GfGE[/wp_youtube]

UPDATE:

After the “how cute” factor wears off, there are concerns to be addressed.

Think of a scenario in which a nefarious nerdowell and rapscallion puts the teddy bear with the C4 and the remote detonator in it into junior’s hands and says “Run up to the Pope and give him this!  It’s okay!  I’ll take you for ice cream later!”

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Lighter fare |
26 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can a priest wear a Cross around his neck?

don CamilloFrom a seminarian:

I am currently a Seminarian and still have 5 years ahead of me until, God willing, ordination. I personally feel a priest should always wear his clericals if not also a cassock, I plan to be in collar always. But my question is, I have always liked the idea of wearing a crucifix around the neck as a witness of faith, are priest allowed to wear a crucifix with the collar and what is your opinion on the subject? Of course I’m not speaking of a pectorial cross.

I am reminded of a story told about the late Bp. Alphonse Schladweiler, great old gent.  At a confirmation he once said, in his booming voice, “Now children, the bishop has been asking you questions.  Do have any questions for the bishop?”  Always dangerous.  One lad piped up, “What’s a Monsignor?”  The priest at the place was a Monsignor.  Without missing a beat the old bishop said “Why, sonny, a Monsignor is the Cross that hangs around the bishop’s neck!”

I don’t believe anything prohibits a secular/diocesan priest from wearing a crucifix suspended from his neck.  Bishops do this routinely.  

I am talking only about Latin Church priests now.  I don’t know what the customs of my Eastern brothers are.  I suspect they use Crosses abundantly as part of their regular garb.

In any event, I don’t think there is any law prohibiting a priest from wearing a Cross or Crucifix.

For my part, I find it a bit odd.  I can see a label pin, but a Cross?  Not so much, for me at least.  Some religious have the Crucifix or Cross as part of their habit.  But that’s a habit.   I think the military or Roman collar says a great deal and it was not really the custom of diocesan priests to wear Crosses like that.

As far as the cassock is concerned, in the USA it was once ecclesiastical law that secular/diocesan priests were not to go about in cassocks except in the course of, say, bringing the Last Sacraments or Communion.  They would wear the cassock at home and church and in the course of their regular duties, such as teaching.  Otherwise they were to use black secular dress with clerical bands or military “Roman” collar.  I think I am old enough and had enough influence from older priests to the point that that is my preference when in the USA.  In Italy I pretty much live in my cassock most of the day.

That said, those laws for the USA which were established at the Council of Baltimore are no longer in effect.   The Directory for Priests indicates that the cassock is the dress of the priest and, as a substitute, the clerical suit.

The Directory says:

[66.] … For this reason, the clergy should wear “suitable ecclesiastical dress, in accordance with the norms established by the Episcopal Conference and the legitimate local custom”. This means that the attire, when it is not the cassock, must be different from the manner in which the laity dress, and conform to the dignity and sacredness of his ministry. The style and colour should be established by the Episcopal Conference, always in agreement with the dispositions of the universal law.

I believe that in the USA the conference has permitted as colors for priests to wear just black clothing.  In Italy priests can use black, dark blue, or gray.

The USCCB, dealing with CIC 1983 can. 284, on clerical dress,  said:

In liturgical rites, clerics shall wear the vesture prescribed in the proper liturgical books. Outside liturgical functions, a black suit and Roman collar are the usual attire for priests. The use of the cassock is at the discretion of the cleric.

We had some discussion once about what deacons can wear.  Apparently, according to this note of the USCCB, if deacons perhaps should go about in the black suit and Roman collar, they can in the cassock.  I think someone didn’t have their coffee that morning.

In any event, many young diocesan priests these days, in the USA have made the choice the wear the cassock everywhere.  That’s fine.  It gives me pause, I must say.  This must be because I am a bit old fashioned and my sensibilities about this were formed by contact with men such as the fabled late Msgr. Schuler and those coeval priests who were in orbit around the place.  This is also why I have never taken to facial hair or jewelry, etc., which were prohibited in the old days for diocesan priests.

Bottom line: Worry about getting through seminary with good grades and good formation.  If they say were clerical dress, wear it when they tell you to.

Worry about what to wear as a priest when you are a priest.

My practice in the USA, which is open to adjustments, is to stick to the American custom of the black suit on the streets and cassock when in the course of liturgical or other functions.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
24 Comments

QUAERITUR: I am unsure about whether my marriage is valid.

From a reader:

Can ones marriage be valid if it is clear that impediments listed in
Canon Law were present at the time of the marriage (and continued to
be as well) ? If not valid, then can the couple agree on continence
and focusing their attention in their growth in holiness and the
proper rearing of Catholic children – and be in the state of grace?

You don’t give me much to work with here.

My best advice is, if you have the slightest doubt that your marriage is valid, seek out your parish priest right away and explain your concerns.   If it is necessary, the parish priest/pastor can help you deal with the impediments there may be, or at least provide you with clear knowledge so that you can take the correct next step.

If there are children who depend on you, you have a natural responsibility to their rearing.  In that case, if there is a problem with your marriage, you can remain together, but in perfect continence, until such time as the difficulties with your marriage are solved or your children are grown to a point where you can separate if necessary.

The point is: Don’t sit and wonder about this.  Go to the parish priest and explain what your concerns are.  Find out what can be or must be done.

This is a matter of your immortal soul and that of your spouse.  The overriding purpose of marriage is to help you both get to heaven.  Don’t put that in jeopardy because you are hesitant or embarrassed.  It is awful not knowing what the situation actually is.

It may be that you are imagining problems that are not really there.  There may be real problems.  FIND OUT.

If your parish priest is lies than concerned to deal with your questions, or tries to brush off real problems as if they were not important, or tells you that something you know is wrong is not a big deal, or he is just moron, then find another priest or inquire from the bishop what you should do.   But if he can explain the situation and tell you your situation really is okay, and what he says sounds kosher, don’t insist that there is a problem when there isn’t one.  You can always ask for a second opinion, but usually the priest, if he isn’t a dope, will give you the right information to begin with.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
13 Comments

Summorum Pontificum: what is possible?

I have been writing more about Summorum Pontificum lately than I have for a while.

We have to remind people that Summorum Pontificum gave us some provisions that have the force of law.  They are not merely part of the vision of this Pope, which means a lot especially when it comes to liturgy.  They are the law of the Latin Church.

It may be that priests and bishops you deal with don’t personally like the provisions of the Motu Proprio.  So long as they follow them, they are within the bounds of the law whatever their personal preferences may be.

This comes from Rorate:

You Report: Nearly 1 in 5 Diocese of Arlington Churches offer TLM …

“A newly added Mass will begin this Sunday in the Diocese of Arlington (Va.). Saint Anthony (mission church of Saint Elizabeth of Hungary) in King George, Va., will have Mass each Sunday at 12:45 p.m. This brings the total to 12 churches (plus Christendom College’s chapel) with regularly scheduled TLMs in the Diocese of Arlington, which has a total of 68 parishes, or nearly 20 percent of diocesan parishes.”

This example proves that, even under the thumb of a bishop historically hostile to tradition, holy priests determined to bring about true restoration of the Mass and Faith can be successful.

I give the credit to the lay faithful, especially, and also the priests.

20% of parishes in the diocese.  Arlington is a small diocese, with only 68 parishes.

What would that look like in your diocese?

Keeping in mind that 20% is still only 1-in-5, a small minority….

… if you live in say the …

Archdiocese of New York: 96 parishes

Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis: 44 parishes

Archdiocese of Los Angeles: 66 parishes

Diocese of …. ?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged ,
91 Comments

QUAERITUR: How should we approach a priest to ask for the Extraordinary Form?

Vote for Fr. Z!From a reader:

A group at my parish is planning on approaching our pastor to request Mass in the Extraordinary Form. I would like to be prepared to answer his questions about the “mechanics” of putting on this Mass: training the altar servers; providing for the expense of additional altar “equipment” that the parish may need, such as patens, bells, etc. The most important question: what do we need to do about placement of  the tabernacle? Ours is off to one side on a side altar in the sanctuary, not on the main central altar. I have not been able to find an answer to this question on-line. Thank you for your help.

I applaud your desire to request Holy Mass in the Extraordinary Form.

The Supreme Pontiff’s Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum says (my translation):

Art. 5, § 1.  In parishes, where there is stably present a group of the faithful attached to the previous liturgical tradition, let the pastor willingly receive their petitions that Mass be celebrated according to the Rite of the Missale Romanum issued in 1962.  Let him see to it that the good of these faithful be harmoniously brought into accord with the ordinary pastoral care of the parish, under the governance of the Bishop according to canon 392, by avoiding discord and by fostering the unity of the whole Church.

I think your answer to any questions from the pastor about the “mechanics” must be this:

Father, don’t worry about a thing.  We will do everything.  We will set up for every Mass.  We will train the servers, though if you would pop in once in a while that would be great!  We will form the schola cantorum and we will pay from our pockets any musicians or singers we need.  We will purchase for you right away a beautiful edition of the Missale Romanum: just pick the one you desire (Fr. Z reviewed two great editions here).  We will take care of printing any sheets people in the pews might need.  We will do all the scheduling for the lay people who will be involved.  We will unlock and lock the church and clean it up.  Perhaps you, Father, could suggest the names of a few priests we can contact on your behalf if you need a substitute.  We will, when necessary, provide him some transportation if he desires and also pay his stipend.  If you, Father, need any training materials, just say the word and we will order everything for you immediately.  We will also take care of taking up the collection during Mass and making sure you get it right away.  Is there anything else you can think of, Father, that we can do to make this easy for you? Do you want some Roman-style vestments?  Just tell us the colors.  Do you have a biretta?  We will get you one right away.  What is your hat size?  Don’t know?  I have a tape measure in my pocket.  Would you like a new cassock?  Do we need sacred vessels?  We can sit with a catalog and you can indicate which you will prefer for these Masses.  We would also be happy to pay to have the whole sanctuary tidied up.  We would be pleased to pay to get rid of the carpet and return the main altar to its prominence by removing the free-standing altar and putting the tabernacle back in the center.  No, Father!  Really, we mean that.  You chuckle, but just say the word.  We will handle anything you point us at!   We will make due with the tabernacle to the side… until you are ready to move it.  Then we will pay for it. Furthermore, after Mass the servers will kneel by the tabernacle when everything is put in its place and say a prayer for you, our pastor, and the bishop.

There.  That should do it.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged
57 Comments