A glimpse into planning for liturgy!

A friend of mine who works in the ad biz (that’s advertisement business for people who live to close to the Vortex) to give me a glimpse into his world.

"But wait, friend!", quoth I.  "This reminds me of something.  What could it be?

Yes, this harks to what we were taught in our über-liberal seminary liturgy colloquium and liturgy preparation planning sessions about how to, yes, plan and prepare liturgy (always pronounced with the italics). 

It could be that this process of blue-skying together lends itself well to planning liturgy. 

I wonder if this is what meetings of the Consilium were like when they presented their liturgy plans to Paul VI?

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wac3aGn5twc&p=77CD2615F3B6A00F]

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
15 Comments

In search of … THE VORTEX

I was recently in Kansas City, MO.

Denizens of Kansas City and travelers alike take a great risk when moving about in that city.

They may fall into…

THE VORTEX.

No, I am not talking about the guy with the videos.

I mean …

THE VORTEX.

Some of you may not realize that Kansas City is the location of divergent ecclesial vectors of force.  When considered in isolation, they are remarkable but not necessarily of great concern.

But when considered in relation to each other

THE VORTEX.

In Kansas City – all within a few blocks of each other – you will find:

  • The Chancery of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph
  • The HQ of the National Catholic Fishwrap… errr… Reporter
  • The chapel of the SSPX, St. Vincent’s

You know about the Bermuda Triangle, right?

Stuff went in and never came out again!

My friends and I are convinced that were to to find the exact epicenter of the ecclesial forces at work between these three coordinates, you would encounter…

THE VORTEX.

Go to the exact center and you never come out.

If Preserved Killick were in a Superman movie instead of an 18th British ship of the line, not at all unlikely given this subject matter, he would surely say, “Which the Phantom Zone ain’t in it!”

As a public service, and for your safety, we sacrificed ourselves and went on a hunt for…

THE VORTEX.

Having made a good confession, and a map from Google, we set out cheered by a hot mug of Mystic Monk Coffee to find the three-fold force vectors.

We sought first the SSPX chapel, St. Vincent’s and determined that that force was probably located at the position of the altar in the church.  It stands to reason, no?

Note the papal flag and the sinister “Reserved” sign.  Portentous.  But of what, we didn’t know at the time.

And we still don’t know!  We thought it may have something to do with excommunications, or maybe… parking.

The church is nice, though it is a fixer-upper.  Tidy and orderly it needs work.

Here is the altar.

The baldichin is surely portentous.  It signifies faith in the Presence of God in the Eucharist and reverence.   Think about that… situated at the end of an ecclesial force vector reaching not so very far to the HQ of the NCR!

In the narthex, we found some helpful tools for our quest, including some literature, which would serve an important purpose later.

We figured we would not need any emergency chapel veils.

Then it was off to plot the next coordinate.  To the chancery!

Behold the administrative center of the diocese, where we figured the source of the ecclesial force vector would be, of course, Bp. Finn’s office.  We pinpointed it, and moved on.

BTW… on the outer wall of the chancery there was set in shining bronze the coat of arms of the diocese.  It reminded me of things like jurisdiction.  Portentous to be sure.

We didn’t have to go far, but this was one of the most dangerous of the steps…. around the block to the offices of the National Catholic Reporter.

Yes, this is nearly within a stone’s throw of the bishop’s office.

Imagine the riptides of ecclesial force vectors that must eddy around this area… pulled north and west by the SSPX altar!

Here I am again, putting on a brave front.

Remember: I am a professional.

Do not attempt this without a priest!

I don’t know what the flowering bush portended.  It was as if … I don’t know.  It was so different from the last time I trod upon … that ground.

Even now I can feel the coldness that started to rise upward from the ground.  I shiver.

At the side entrance, you could see traces of some work going on.  There were, for example, some cleaning cloths, a squirt-bottle and what appeared to be … a box.

Any two of those things by themselves… well you get the idea.  But the box had a portentous aspect to it that even now, gives me chills.

Because we had been crisscrossing these forces, we decided to go home and fortify ourselves with some Mystic Monk Coffee and do the calculations.  At the crossing of these vectors, we were about to find at long last…

THE VORTEX.

We marked the coordinates of our three ecclesial force vectors on our precision map and then used a pamphlet from the SSPX narthex to draw the first line, from the chancery to the exact location of the altar of the chapel.

Then, for the longer line we used a sturdier newsletter also from the chapel, to draw the line between the SSPX and the NCR.

We were going to use a copy of the NCR itself for this, but found to our horror that we could not draw a straight line with it!

It was a simpler matter to draw the line between the NCR and chancery, which was mercifully short.

Then it was time to draw the intersecting lines from each angle to the midpoints of the force vectors to get a high-precision exact pin-pointed location.  We had to measure to find the exact mid-points.

One line was drawn with the Mystic Monk Coffee product list.

To draw the intersecting line of the offices of the NCR and the midpoint between the SSPX and the chancery, well… as you can see, we had to switch to a sturdier high-precision measuring device.

It took both of us to hold it down at this stage!

Having plotted all the coordinates and traced the lines with precision exactitude, we studied the map with excitement but trepidation.  Mostly trepidation.  Maybe about 70% trepidation, and 20% excitement with curiosity thrown in.  But then trepidation is a sort of excitement, no?  How to measure?

Back to the map.  We studied our findings.

This is part of the studying process.

I have added some red lines to help you see what we found…. that is, the location of…

THE VORTEX.

But… as I am sure you are also asking…. “But Father! But Father!”, you are surely asking.  “What is this I see?!?  What is that triangle to the west of … that thing you are talking about?”

Yes, friends.  We noticed it and placed some subtle indicators lest we lose track of it while we investigated further.

On the surface of the data, you would think that we found the very place.  But, it was simply too much of a coincidence that there should be nearby a TRIANGULAR street lay out, I repeat TRIANGULAR street layout intersection thingy so close to our precision calculated epicenter.

Coincidence?  I think not.

Perhaps synchronicity, since this is dealing with the vicissitudes of time and space impinging on the matter of the cosmos?

But why, we asked ourselves, would there be this offset?  Making a mistake about the location and then going there could have drastic consequences!

It was necessary to return to the map to search for clues.

Finally, after more Mystic Monk Coffee, we figured it out.

Look at this map detail.

I placed a thin red circle about.. yes… a Scottish Rite MASONIC TEMPLE just slightly to the SW of the SSPX Chapel!

See?  See?!?

The anti-ecclesial force vectors emanating from the Masonic lodge so close to the SSPX chapel are just strong enough to weaken its influence!  Therefore the anti-pull and retrograde-polarity exerted by the NCRyes, the NCR and not the SSPXwas able to dislocate the epicenter of the forces slightly in its favor, thus shifting the location of…

THE VORTEX.

I had to leave Kansas City at this point, and put some distance between myself and these powers.

But I can now report that we have a photo of what we believe is the actual location of…

THE VORTEX.



Note the center island … at the very center there is … what must we call it… a funnel-shaped form.

A warning?

Now avert your eyes for a moment and then refocus on this detail.

What is this we see?

You have seen them ten thousand times if you have seen them once.

But was there ever one more portentous?

“DO NOT ENTER”, says the sign.

Theologically we know that signs point to invisible realities.

An apophatic approach to these theological physics suggests that the power of the signs is actually in the space between the signs, what is not there!

Get it?!?

This, folks, must be it.  The center of …

… THE VORTEX.

On my next trip to Kansas City, encouraged by Mystic Monk Coffee, we will mount an expedition to the very place to see what happens when we enter.

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", "How To..." - Practical Notes, Global Killer Asteroid Questions, Just Too Cool, On the road, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
58 Comments

NCR’s latest Magical Liturgical Mystery Tour

On the site of the National Catholic Fishwrap, Eugene Kennedy, ex-priest and humanistic psychologist, attacks the "reform of the reform".  He is actually attacking the new translation of the Roman Missal. 

His piece is so turgid that it is hard to know just what he is driving at. 

I caught in the first part that he thinks that those who created and issued the new translation were reacting to a perceived ill in the Church which, in Kennedy’s opinion, doesn’t actually exist.  The new translation is being peddled as snake oil.

In any event, what are we to make of this.  Read it slowly:

"Joseph Campbell termed this massive tear in the fabric of life as "Mythic Dissociation." When this occurs we find ourselves in what poet T.S. Eliot describes as The Waste Land. This basic estrangement from any feeling for the mystical energy of the church as the Sacramentum Mundi, the mystical mirror in which the beleaguered world can see a reflection of its profound longings and strivings, can be observed in the way the sacraments are almost exclusively discussed. They are spoken of as static objects to be regulated rather than living symbols to be celebrated."

Mystical energy?  What would that be? 

Mystical mirror

Do we really want to turn to Joseph Campbell in this matter?

Beyond the fact that this is sheer gobbledygook, note that Kennedy’s notion of liturgy and liturgy language closes us in on ourselves.  It is entirely immanent

Don’t be distracted by the sprinkling of "mystical" in there.  The Beatles did that too, in 1967.  I think Kennedy’s thought is more closely aligned with that than with The Waste Land.

There is absolutely NOTHING transcendent about Kennedy’s view.  His liturgical vision is a a reflection of the world’s "strivings".  For Kennedy, the rites must be constantly adapted to our needs.  Fellow travelers, such as His Excellency Bp. Trautman, believe that liturgical language should be constantly adapted to common parlance and be made immediately comprehensible.  Their approach makes our rites into reflections of ourselves, self-enclosed gazing at ourselves. 

There is no salvation in me or in you.  

Kennedy criticizes the new translation. 

"The new texts, in effect, split our everyday experience of struggling to work and to love from their sacramental symbolization in the renewed liturgy of Vatican II."

No surprise there.  What does surprise is that, at the same time, he is really defending the old, lame-duck texts.

Over and against the new text, Kennedy would retain the lame-duck translation which includes such sparkling gems as this, which appears on the 19th Sunday of Ordinary Time.  We need the Latin first.

Super Oblata:
LATIN (2002 Missale Romanum):
Ecclesiae tuae, Domine, munera placatus assume,
quae et misericors offerenda tribuisti,
et in nostrae salutis potenter efficis transire mysterium
.

Now, in offering next a literal version I am not saying that we should pray this way!  Read this for content, not the clunky style of a …

SLAVISH and CLUNKY LITERAL TRANSLATION:
O Lord, having been appeased take unto yourself the gifts of your Church
which you both mercifully bestowed as things to be offered as sacrifices
and you mightily are causing to transform into the mysterious sacrament of our salvation
.

Now look at the …

Lame-Duck ICEL:
God of power,
giver of the gifts we bring,
accept the offering of your Church
and make it the sacrament of our salvation
.

This isn’t just bad translation.  This is insidious distortion.

Again, it isn’t that the people at ICEL back in the day didn’t know how to translate the Latin correctly.  They didn’t want to translate the Latin correctly.  They understood the Latin content and they rejected it.

They eliminated the concept of sacrifice entirely.  They didn’t like the idea of an God to be appeased, which is at the heart of what Sacrifice is for.  Mystery is banished   Mercy is ignored.  The gifts are all about us. 

You take away from the ICEL version that we actually deserve something from our partner-God, who will do her part after we do ours. 

The Latin, however, tells you something very different.

This, friends, is why Liturgiam authenticam was issued.

Let’s review:

19.  The words of the Sacred Scriptures, as well as the other words spoken in liturgical celebrations, especially in the celebration of the Sacraments, are not intended primarily to be a sort of mirror of the interior dispositions of the faithful; rather, they express truths that transcend the limits of time and space. Indeed, by means of these words God speaks continually with the Spouse of his beloved Son, …

20. The Latin liturgical texts of the Roman Rite, while drawing on centuries of ecclesial experience in transmitting the faith of the Church received from the Fathers, are themselves the fruit of the liturgical renewal, just recently brought forth. In order that such a rich patrimony may be preserved and passed on through the centuries, it is to be kept in mind from the beginning that the translation of the liturgical texts of the Roman Liturgy is not so much a work of creative innovation as it is of rendering the original texts faithfully and accurately into the vernacular language. While it is permissible to arrange the wording, the syntax and the style in such a way as to prepare a flowing vernacular text suitable to the rhythm of popular prayer, the original text, insofar as possible, must be translated integrally and in the most exact manner, without omissions or additions in terms of their content, and without paraphrases or glosses. Any adaptation to the characteristics or the nature of the various vernacular languages is to be sober and discreet.

Kennedy wants us to look into our own little pond and see ourselves reflected. 

The Latin prayer wants to bring us to an understanding of pardon, propitiation, Sacrifice, mystery outside ourselves.

You decide.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Translation, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, Throwing a Nutty, WDTPRS | Tagged , ,
17 Comments

MUGS GONE WILD: New Translation Coffee Mug

Coffee MugIt is fun to receive photos from readers of their WDTPRS coffee mugs “in the wild”.

This morning I found this in my mailbox from FH of OH.

Looks like a nice way to start the morning.

This is a new edition of the “Say The Black – Do The Red” mug, which is on the other side.

UPDATE 1758 GMT:

A priest reader, Fr. MG of NY, sent the following note:

Today I inaugurated (baptized?) my new “Oremus pro pontifice” mug at breakfast with Orange Zinger herbal tea – I just can’t drink coffee, even if it’s made by Mystic Monks.  [Unicuique!]

This momentous event took place at the rectory of …. The tea was accompanied by Americanized “huevos rancheros”: a scrambled egg mixed with onions and shredded chicken fried in olive oil, topped with grated sharp cheddar and chunky salsa (medium strength), served on a medium-dark slice of 12-grain whole grain toast.  I don’t usually do more than toast and jam, but the papal mug deserved a more noble entourage.

I also put the corresponding magnet on the fridge to hold up our rectory grocery list, and plan on giving out the other 9 of the 10-pack to friends.

WDTPRS applauds the diligence of this good and wise priest.

Oremus pro Pontifice nostro Benedicto!

_________

This morning I had the Mystic Monk Espresso Blend.

I’m Fr. Z, and I endorse this coffee!

 

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
15 Comments

Connection of liturgical abuse and abuse of minors?

I read an interesting take today with a new view of a possible nexus of abuse of children by women religious and priests and, on the other hand liturgical abuse of congregations by women religious and priests.

On the blog MommyWrites comes, the writer starts with an explanation that she is teaching CCD to 2nd graders… may God bless her.  She describes a video that has something to do with her mandatory VIRTUS program.  The video showed how to deal with children and it showed really bad liturgy.  She makes a very interesting point toward the end. 

Here is what she said:

As I watched, I wondered what message the Bishops were trying to send by including bad liturgy in the Virtus video.

1. Was it supposed to evoke warm fuzzy feelings? “Why, that parish is just like MY parish!” It didn’t, because those liturgical abuses wouldn’t fly around here.

2. Was it supposed to show us what the Bishops think a parish SHOULD look like? If so, I weep for our Church.

3. Or was it something more subtle? Was it supposed to help us make the connection between Liturgical abuse and sexual abuse? [NB:] After all, if we can’t treat the body of our Lord and Saviour with respect, why would we treat the bodies of our neighbors with respect? Is there a short, slippery slope that runs between sloppiness at Mass and sin?

I have a feeling that the makers of the video were aiming for 1 and 2. But I think our pope would probably point to number 3. When we take Mass and the Eucharist seriously and let all our relationships flow forth from that first, essential relationship as Christ, we cannot use other people as objects. When the Mass goes, everything else starts to go too.

Of course, abuse can happen in ‘Good Liturgy’ settings too – because good liturgy can not be our goal. Our goal is to love and adore Christ. I think that a reverent liturgy flows naturally from a love of Christ in the Eucharist and a realization that we’re in the presence of God. (For instance, I noticed my 6-year-old’s behavior at Mass has improved DRAMATICALLY since we started attending Children’s adoration once a month.) If you have a nice-looking Liturgy, but no love, it’s just an empty pageant.

On the other hand, most awful liturgies are also empty pageants, focused on the congregation instead of the Divine.

In the end, I did learn something at Virtus training. Father Z is right. “Save the Liturgy, Save the World.” It’s not a coincidence that the pope who is focused on cleaning up the filth of abuse in the Church is also focused on cleaning up the Liturgy. If we can’t respect God, we won’t respect each other.

 

Interesting.

I wonder if it is possible to make a connection at this point with those who are trying to poison the atmosphere regarding the implementation of the new English translation.

Posted in Clerical Sexual Abuse | Tagged , , ,
55 Comments

Whose feast today in the Roman Calendar?

According to the 2005 Martyrologium Romanum today is  …

1. Commemoratio sancti Iosue, filii Nun, servi Domini, qui, cum Moyses manus ei imposuisset, repletus est spiritu sapientiae et post Moysis mortem populum Israel per Iordanis alveum in terram promissionis mirabiliter introduxit.

Anyone want to take a crack at this?

Today is also the feast of St. Egidius, called St. Glies, Abbot.

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged ,
40 Comments

A Mystic Monk Memo

While I was ordering some Mystic Monk Coffee for myself, I noticed that they sell large format bags of 5 lbs.

This would be a good idea for rectories and religious houses or simply for all of you who consume a lot of coffee!

Buy coffee from the monks in larger amounts!

Do the math: $6 per pound.  A 1 pound bag from Starbucks is usually around $10.95. So…

I’m Fr. Z, and I endorse this coffee!
  • REVIEW: Mystic Monk Coffee
  • Pounds and Grounds and Compounds

 

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
22 Comments

An alternate altar design for Cofton Park

Thanks to the great Vincenzo, we can see how to rescue the design for the big Papal Mass at Cofton Park.

For some background:

WDTPRS POLL: sanctuary design for Pope Benedict’s visit to England

UPDATE: 1 Sept 17:52 GMT:

I see that England’s best Catholic weekly, The Catholic Herald has linked to the original post with the WDTPRS POLL.  Perhaps you readers might reciprocate and contribute well-considered and respectful comments in the discussion over there as well.

Posted in Lighter fare |
13 Comments

A request to readers about a really bad liturgy book from the 60’s

A question to readers:

Does anyone out there have a copy of that fons malorum, a book from the late 60’s …

Hoey, Robert F., The experimental liturgy book / collected and edited by Robert F. Hoey.  —  [New York] : Herder and Herder, 1969

I could use a photo of the cover.  Send by e-mail?

A friend describes this book as satanic because of its effect on a generation.  Apparently this book did huge damage.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
18 Comments

What happens when you break one of those over-sized Hosts.

Over at southern orders I spotted an interesting post which reminded me of the famous Communion in the hand fragments posting here.

My emphases and comments:

Do you see the large fragment to the left of the large un-consecrated host–that’s a crumb on my black trousers as I was breaking the large host! More about this below!

Another picture of crumbs or large fragments from large unconsecrated host I was breaking at the scored part of these hosts!

For the past 30 years I have used the large host in the photo above for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. But no more! [OORAH!] I’ve become more conscious of the fact that when these are "broken" after the Consecration of the Mass, during the "Breaking of the Bread" that large fragments of the host fly all over the place, on clothes, corporal, floor and elsewhere.

I saw this happen this morning in my office as I sat at my desk chair with a Tupperware container. I was breaking the large breads and realized that against my black trousers and the florescent light, I could see large and small fragments flying everywhere! If I had filmed this in slow motion, it would look like these fragments would become like an aerosol spray or a sneeze from a person’s mouth filmed in slow motion. One can’t see this during Mass with the white altar cloth background and the lighting of the Church. [A good point.]

I have already made a decision no longer to use the large, whole wheat hosts because I would find large fragments on the corporal after the Breaking of the Bread. But I had no idea to what extent this was happening. On top of that, the broken hosts from the large one have a very jagged edge with large fragments easily falling as these are given to communicants. [There was a reason why the Church used smaller Hosts.]

I am not a scrupulous person, but I do believe what the Church teaches about transubstantiation and that every fragment of the host no matter how large or small is the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of our Risen Lord. Accidents happen with small fragments and certainly our Risen Lord can take care of Himself. However, knowing now from what I have seen, I cannot in good conscience continue using these large hosts.

We are using the Cavanaugh hosts in white bleached wheat and the traditional smaller large host for the priest beginning this Sunday!

 

WDTPRS kudos to Fr. McDonald. 

And I am happy to report that they are well on their way to solving the rectory rat problem.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
32 Comments