Coming up at Notre Shame…

Remembering always that the Traditional Latin Mass needs to be snuffed at Catholic schools like Steubenville, here’s what’s going on at Notre Shame.

From Breitbart:

The University of Notre Dame’s gender studies program is hosting a talk with the author of a book titled “Queer Holiness.” [And I suppose there are a lot of those who are High Atop The Thing were wondering, “Is there any other kind?”]

Set to take place on March 23rd, the event titled “Queer Holiness” will focus on “the gift of LGBTQI people to the church” and will feature Charles Bell, the author of a book by the same name.

“For millennia, institutional churches have told LGBTQI people what God expects them to be and how to act,” [The NERVE of that “institutional” Church!] the description reads before going on to say “in parts of the church, LGBTQI people remain the subject of hostile questions.” [Ooops!  Wrong acronym.  Shouldn’t that be “TLM”?]

A description of the book says, “From prohibitions on who they might love or marry, to erasure and denial, the theological record is one in which LGBTQI people are far too often objectified and their lives seen as the property of others.” [Do I sense a whiff of Marxism?]

“In no other significant religious question are ‘theological’ arguments made that so clearly reject overwhelming scientific and experiential knowledge about the human person,” the description also reads. [B as in B.  S as in S.]

It goes on to explain, “This book seeks to find a better way to do theology…[ without annoying references to God …]  taking insights from the sciences and personal narratives as it seeks to answer the question: ‘What does human flourishing look like?’” [again, without all that God-stuff.]

Additionally, the event description also states that Dr. Charles Bell is “grounded in his work as both an Anglican priest and a practicing psychiatrist.” [Yeahhh… what could go wrong with that combination.]

Meanwhile, the University of Notre Dame Law School hosted an event last semester called “Transgender Public Interest Litigation,” which was hosted in conjunction with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).  [Probably a “How To” workshop.]

Posted in Pò sì jiù, Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, What are they REALLY saying?, You must be joking! | Tagged ,
15 Comments

From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 23-03-11 – Fr. Tommy and Chester go for a walk

March 11th, 2023

Dear Diary

Stormy day. Sent Fr. Tommy out to walk Chester. Pretty soon I hear him yelling outside my office.  He’s on his phone. I’m looking down from my office window and he’s pacing up and down in the parking lot, or trying to. Chester sank his teeth in Tommy’s fosha (sp?).  Even with the deform thing going on, Chester’s fast.   Tommy managed to wrestle it away and went on stomping around in the lot, pulling C away from the cars.  He’s lost so much weight, like a stick figure with that fosha thing. C dragged him into the bushes. Eventually Tommy dragged him back onto the sidewalk.  I could hear T when the wind blew in this direction. “……I’m gonna have a heart attack!”  Mr Drama Queen! He’s only 29. I don’t think your gonna have a heart attack (at least not before me!).   He got closer to my window and I risked a little crack to hear better.  Pretty bad wind.  He was saying stuff like blah blah jump out the window blah blah convert to Islam blah blah.   I know Fr. Tommy enjoys his time walking C just as much as Sr. Randi but if he gets any thinner Chester’s gonna just take over.  Gotta get this boy more cheeseburgers.

Posted in Diary of Bp. McButterpants | Tagged ,
1 Comment

The Synodal (“walking together”) Way – German Style

That was in the Cathedral of Frankfurt at the end of the first day of Der Synodalen (“zusammen gehen”) Weg

Are we all enlightened enough to walk together that way?

Meanwhile, the Traditional Latin Mass must be extirpated from parishes and bulletins must be micromanaged.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
12 Comments

WDTPRS – 3rd Sunday of Lent (2002MR): Two wings of prayer

Lenten-Discipline

Almsgiving, Fasting, Abstinence, Mortification

WARNING BELOW…

Roman Station: St. Lawrence outside the walls

An examination of our conscience is a humbling experience.  When we look to see who really are inside, we can have different reactions.  Sometimes we find things which frighten and discourage us.  If we are weak in our habits and our faith, that inveterate enemy of ours souls, the Devil who is “father of lies” will rub us raw with our ugliness tempting us to lose hope about the possibility of living a moral life or, in extreme cases, about our salvation.

On a less dramatic plane, falling down in our Lenten resolve on one day can cause a collapse of our will so that we will “flag” and give up.

This is why the Lenten discipline is so important.   By it we learn to govern our appetites, examine our consciences, do penance, and learn the habits which are virtues.  On the other hand, a recognition of sins and failures will “incline” us to call with humble confidence upon the mercy of God who paid the price for our salvation.

Today’s Collect taken from the ancient Gelasian Sacramentary for Saturday of the 4th week of Lent, has many Lenten elements and only a close look at the words can unlock what it really says.

COLLECT
– LATIN TEXT (2002MR):

Deus, omnium misericordiarum et totius bonitatis auctor,
qui peccatorum remedia
in ieiuniis, orationibus et eleemosynis demonstrasti,
hanc humilitatis nostrae confessionem propitius intuere,
ut, qui inclinamur conscientia nostra,
tua semper misericordia sublevemur.

Misericordia means generally “tender-heartedness, pity, compassion, mercy”.  In the plural, as we find it today, it refers to works of mercyWe find both a plural and a singular in today’s prayer and we must make a distinction between them.  Our bulky and bountiful Lewis & Short Dictionary explains that bonitas is the “good quality of a thing” and also various benevolent and virtuous behaviors.  When referring to a parent, bonitas means “parental love, tenderness.”  Demonstro indicates, “to point out” as with the finger, “indicate, designate, show.”  Demonstrasti is a “syncopated” form for demonstravisti, which helps the prayer to flow.  The L&S states that inclino means, “to cause to lean, bend, incline, turn.”  In a more neutral sense it signifies, “to bend, turn, incline, decline, sink.”  By extension it means, “to decline, as in a fever, or sink down in troubles”, but it can also mean, more rarely, “to change, alter from its former condition”.  We are all at sea with this word, so we turn to Souter’s A Glossary of Later Latin and find “to humble”.  This is probably the direction we must go.  Sublevo literally means to lift up from beneath, to raise up, hold up, support.”   Thus it comes to mean also, to sustain, support, assist, encourage, console” and also, “to lighten, qualify, alleviate, mitigate, lessen an evil, to assuage.”

This word is in the beautiful 10th century Mozarabic Lenten hymn Attende, Domine often sung in parishes around the world even today: “Give heed, O Lord, and be merciful, for we have sinned against you. / To you, O high King, Redeemer of all, / we raise up (sublevamur) our eyes weeping:/ hear, O Christ, the prayers of those bent down begging.”

Confessio is from confiteor (con-fateor – the first word in our expression of sorrow for sins at the beginning of Mass).  This is a complicated word.  First, confessio is obviously “a confession or acknowledgment”.  The Latin Vulgate (Heb 3:1) and St. Gregory the Great (+604 – Ep. 7,5) use it for “a creed, avowal of belief” in the sense of an acknowledgment of Christ.  The most famous use of confessio, however, must be that of St. Augustine of Hippo (+430), whose stupendous autobiographical prayer is now known as Confessiones.  The excellent Augustinus Lexicon now being developed says confessio has three major meanings: profession of faith in God, praise of God, and admission to God of sins.  We can say “testify” or “give witness to.”  Augustine uses the word testimonium twice in the second sentence of his Confessions.  This is not “confession” in the sense of admission of criminal guilt, nor is it merely to a Christian confession of sins.  Rather, it is a way of giving witness to the Christian character we put on in baptism, a witness by how we live to what the Lord has done within us.  Sometimes that response requires humble admission of sins, sometimes it requires humbly giving glory to God.  Sometimes it demands patient fidelity and the practice virtue in the tedium of everyday life.  Sometimes it requires more spectacular deeds, even martyrdom.  It always demands humility.  The best confession we make is in our words and deeds, according to our state in life, in the midst of the circumstances we face each day no matter what they are.

Our Collect reminds us of the remedies for sin identified by Jesus Himself: prayer, fasting (cf. Matthew 9:14), and almsgiving or works of mercy (cf. Matthew 6:1; Luke 12:33).

When Jesus cures the epileptic demoniac, He says that that sort of demon is driven out only by both prayer and fasting (Mark 9:27 Vulgate).  In Acts 10 an angel tells the centurion Cornelius that his prayers and alms have been seen favorably by God (literally, they ascended as a memorial before God in the manner of a sacrifice).

St. Augustine said: “Do you wish your prayer to fly toward God? Make for it two wings: fasting and almsgiving” (En. ps. 42, 8).

In a Lenten Angelus address on 16 February 1997, St. John Paul II said:

The Church points out to us a path (of moving from a superficial life to deep interiority, from selfishness to love, of striving to live according to the model of Christ himself, that) … can be summarized in three words: prayer, fasting, almsgiving.  Prayer can have many expressions, personal and communal. But we must above all live its essence, listening to God who speaks to us, conversing with us as children in a “face to face” dialogue filled with trust and love.  In addition to being an external practice, fasting, which consists in the moderation of food and life-style, is a sincere effort to remove from our hearts all that is the result of sin and inclines us to evil.  Almsgiving, far from being reduced to an occasional offering of money, means assuming an attitude of sharing and acceptance. We only need to “open our eyes” to see beside us so many brothers and sisters who are suffering materially and spiritually. Thus Lent is a forceful invitation to solidarity.

This brings us to conscientiaConscientia signifies in the first place, “a knowing of a thing together with another person, joint knowledge, consciousness”.  Note the unity, or solidarity, of knowledge in the prefix con-.  It also means, “conscientiousness” in the sense of knowledge or feelings about a thing.  It also has a moral meaning also as, “a consciousness of right or wrong, the moral sense”.

LITERAL TRANSLATION:
O God, author of all acts of mercy and all goodness,
who in fasts, prayers, and acts of almsgiving indicated the remedies of sins,
look propitiously on this testimony of our humility,
so that we who are being humbled in our conscience
may always be consoled by your mercy.

Remember, words have different meanings, which I why I provide raw vocabulary.

I must point out something that could change this literal translation.

St. Augustine in one of his sermons speaks of the mercy of God.  Using the example of Jesus’ mercy to the woman caught in adultery (John 8), Augustine says – as if Jesus were talking – “Those others were restrained by conscience (conscientia) from punishing, mercy moves (inclinat misericordia) me to help you (ad subveniendum)” (s. 13.5 – 27 May 418 on the feast of St. Cyprian of Carthage).   Even though in the Collect inclino is paired with conscientia rather than misericordia as it is in the sermon, the vocabulary suggests that this sermon may have been a partial source for this ancient Collect.  This could provide a clue as to how to translate it.   So, we can say “we who are being moved by our conscience” or even “we who are being brought low, bent down, humbled by our conscience” or “we who are flagging (as if under a weight) in our conscience”.

What to do?  When translating we have to make a choice.  This time around I chose “being humbled”.

As a people united before Christ’s altar of sacrifice, humbled and cast down low, we raise our eyes upwards to the Father who tenderly sees our efforts.   But we can become weary in the midst of our Lenten discipline and the enemy is tirelessly working for our defeat.

Do not forget the military imagery of exercises and discipline we had in previous weeks.

In today’s Collect we beg Him to pick us back up, dust us off, and help us stay upright for the rest of the hard Lenten march (sublevemur).

In am reminded of the moment in the film The Passion of the Christ when Christ falls under His horrible burden of the Cross.  His Mother, our Mother, recalling how once He had fallen as a child and how she had run to Him to console Him in His unexpected pain, runs to Him to give Him what support she might in His entirely expected suffering.

She ran to Him and then stood with Him.

Mary hurries also to each of us and stays by our side.

We are not in our Lenten discipline alone.  When we are flagging in our efforts, when we are humbled in our failures, our Blessed Mother is our help, together with all the saints and angels of whom she is the glorious Queen.

We too can be help to others, particularly by not causing for them an occasion of temptation to break their resolve.

WARNING: I seem not to be able to watch this without choking up.  I’ll bet you will too.  If you are a “tough guy”, I’d shut the door.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
3 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 688

Photo by The Great Roman™

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Meanwhile,…

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

In Pro Chess League action the Norway Gnomes will go to the playoffs by defeating MGD1 and the Saint Louis Arch Bishops iced the Maniac Shrimps.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

ASK FATHER: Can. 1116! “How might this apply to SSPX weddings?”

I’m about to attempt a Herculean task: help people to understand something about the Church’s law about marriages in light of SSPX issues.

May God have mercy on my soul.

Firstly, I had a question come in:

How might this apply to SSPX weddings?

Can. 1116 §1. If a person competent to assist according to the norm of law cannot be present or approached without grave inconvenience, those who intend to enter into a true marriage can contract it validly and licitly before witnesses only:

Okay, let’s see the whole of can. 1116 of the 1863 Code:

Can. 1116 §1. If a person competent to assist according to the norm of law cannot be present or approached without grave inconvenience, those who intend to enter into a true marriage can contract it validly and licitly before witnesses only:

1/ in danger of death;
2/ outside the danger of death provided that it is prudently foreseen that the situation will continue for a month.

§2. In either case, if some other priest or deacon who can be present is available, he must be called and be present at the celebration of the marriage together with the witnesses, without prejudice to the validity of the marriage before witnesses only.

The “grave inconvenience” means that if Catholics have ZERO access to a Catholic bishop, priest, deacon, or even a suitable lay person appointed by the bishop, either for a long time or for a shorter time in the case of danger of death, they can use this option to exchange matrimonial consent in front of just two witnesses.

What situation(s) would allow the application of this canon? Danger of death or “grave inconvenience.” “Grave inconvenience” can result from extreme geographical distance and/or the physical inability of the parties to drive a car or to walk.  It includes the inability of the priest, deacon, or lay person appointed by the bishop to, e.g., cross through a war zone to reach the parties, etc.

Moreover, the canon does not in any way indicate that it can be invoked for “moral impossibility”, which is the understandable sentiment of some Catholics who do not wish to exchange consent before a Novus Ordo priest or have any kind of Novus Ordo celebration of marriage.  That said, the “Green” commentary explicitly states that the canon cannot be invoked by a couple who do not want to be married in front of a priest of questionable theological orthodoxy.

In the rare instance that this canon is invoked, it is done in consultation with the bishop’s office when the parties must get married and cannot wait until the following month when a Catholic priest or deacon will be in the area (e.g., places in Alaska).  They can exchange consent in the presence of two witnesses, even non-Catholics.

PLEASE NOTE: Do not for a nanosecond imagine that, just because you are having a hard time finding a TLM Nuptial Mass and a traditionally minded to witness your vows, you can just get married in front of two witnesses on your own.  You CAN NOT DO THAT.  It would be invalid. This canon is for super-rare circumstances that I have laid out.

Hence, this provision does not apply to 99% of people in 99% of situations. It does not, I think, apply to the chapels of the SSPX, although I know of a video about a heroic SSPX priest who goes on rounds to Alaska.

Then I got another question:

But what about a sympathetic parish priest of the local diocesan Latin Mass parish no longer permitted to celebrate weddings according to the traditional form. Couldn’t that priest (who has jurisdiction) deliberately participate in an SSPX wedding (the way he might at a Lutheran Church or Synagogue) to create validity? That wouldn’t seem to violate the letter of TC but would no doubt eventually, if effective, be stopped by the Bishop. But at least it would work for some at the beginning.

No. There can only be one “official witness of the Catholic Church” (that is, the celebrant or officiant) for a wedding.

A Catholic priest who “participates” in a Lutheran or Jewish wedding described above presumes that one of the parties is Catholic and has either asked for permission for a mixed marriage (in the case of marrying a Lutheran), or has received a dispensation for disparity of worship (in the case of marrying a Jew).  In both or in either case, the Catholic party would also have to have requested and obtained a dispensation from the Catholic canonical form of marriage (including exchanging consent in front of the Catholic Church’s official witness, i.e., a bishop, priest, deacon, or in a case of necessity a lay person appointed by the bishop).

When a Catholic requests a dispensation from the Catholic canonical form of marriage in order to marry a non-Catholic, the celebrant or officiant is the non-Catholic minister or other non-Catholic official (e.g., Lutheran minister, rabbi). IF A CATHOLIC PRIEST IS PRESENT at such a wedding, it is not in any official capacity. He would not be the celebrant or officiant, of which there can only be one. The Catholic priest’s presence at a wedding of this kind does not in any way “create validity”. All the more so if the Lutheran chapel or synagogue falls outside of the Catholic priest’s own parish territory.

Therefore, at an SSPX wedding, either the bishop would have to give the SSPX priest the faculty and delegation for a wedding (which is what the 2017 Letter asks bishops to do), or a local diocesan priest would have to be the celebrant or officiant for the Rite of Marriage after which the SSPX priest could celebrate the Nuptial Mass.

Given that the Rite of Marriage in the traditional form takes place just before the Nuptial Mass begins, the local diocesan priest would have to be the one witnessing the bride and groom’s exchange of consent. Again, if the local diocesan priest is doing this outside of his own parish of which he is pastor, he, too, must have delegation in order to do so validly.

People are coming up with very “creative” canonical half-guesses, not understanding how canon law actually works.  I’m afraid that there’s no canonical workaround. The bottom line seems to be that other than the Mass, all sacraments according to the older forms are being forbidden. There really is no way around this that I can see.

The message from restrictive shepherds to those who embrace Tradition is clear: We don’t love you.

 

Posted in Canon Law, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
16 Comments

From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 23-03-10 – Odds and ends

March 10th, 2023

Dear Diary,

I was subtle in asking Fr. Tommy about “VF” — and he said it was “Vicar Forane.” It sounded like “foreign” because Fr. Algernon is certainly that. But Tommy spelled it out, f-o-r-a-n-e.  I thought it was one of those degrees like an MDiv they give to seminarians.

Turns out it’s just a fancy way of saying “dean” of a deanery.  Why can’t they just say dean?

I sneaked a peek in Tommy’s Latin dictionary to look up “Estis”. It’s not there!  Latin is hard.  I really don’t know why I have to get the “Vos Estis” treatment since it’s my predecessor’s fault. Wasn’t the nickname “Feel the Byrne” enough?

Note to self: Ask Tommy about that nice Latin saying embroidered by Mr. Domenico in my new chasuble.

Still unsure about using DD.

Posted in Diary of Bp. McButterpants, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
Comments Off on From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 23-03-10 – Odds and ends

Daily Rome Shot 687

Photo by The Great Roman™

Welcome registrant:

Trad94

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Meanwhile,…

White to move.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Interested in learning?  Try THIS.

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

The wonderful Summit Dominicans provide more than soap! Check their shop.

In Pro Chess League news, the Levitov Wizards decisively beat Magnus and the Chessbrahs of Canada to advance to the Playoffs. The Passers advance to Week 5 over the Unicorns. Today the Norway Gnomes are matched again MGD1 and the Spain Maniac Shrimps take on the Arch Bishops of St. Louis.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
3 Comments

NOPE!

I’ll let you readers tell us why.

Posted in You must be joking! | Tagged , , ,
16 Comments

From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 23-03-09 – Regional meeting

March 9th, 2023

Dear Diary,

We had a regional bishops meeting yesterday.  They were all there… Dozer, Jude, Andy, Mateo, Jack of course since it was at the archdiocese.  Usually they’re a blast. Other folks do the work preparing policy statements for us to sign. We get together, tell a few jokes and reminisce, then the archbishop tells us to get serious (which always causes me to chuckle a bit), we say a prayer, all agree to whatever it is were there to agree about, then get on to the preprandials and usually have a decent dinner. This time, Jack’s young punk auxiliary – Terry? Larry? – who doesn’t get it actually wanted to discuss whatever it was we were suppose to sign, which meant I had to take the time to read it. I’m still not sure I understand it, but I just wanted to get along to the socializing, so I agreed with him. That made the archbishop mad, so I reconsidered my opinion. Then someone else quibbled with the wording – as if anyone is ever going to take the time to read this crap! All the while, my coffee is getting cold and I’m sure the gin in the next room was getting warm. Dozer at last suggested tabling it and “revisiting” (good word) at the next meeting which means between now and then the arch is going to sit down with his aux and tell him what his role is, and we’ll sign it three months from now. Sheesh. That was a wasted hour of my time. Still, a good dinner afterwards.  Sure glad Fr. Tommy does the driving.

Posted in Diary of Bp. McButterpants | Tagged
2 Comments