Air Force Bases to change names: SPACE FORCE BASE!

For your Just Too Cool file.

From Florida Today

Air Force: Space Coast bases will change names to reflect Space Force

The Space Coast’s two Air Force bases will soon change names to reflect their connections to the military’s newly minted Space Force branch.

Patrick Air Force Base and Cape Canaveral Air Force Station will become Patrick Space Force Base and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station within 30 days, 45th Space Wing Commander Brig. Gen. Douglas Schiess said during his “State of the Installation” briefing early Friday. [How cool is that?  Space Wing!  If I were 40 years younger….]

“The names of the two bases will change,” Schiess said, adding that Secretary of the Air Force Barbara Barrett and Space Force commander Gen. John Raymond will attend a local name change ceremony. “When that happens, we believe we’ll probably be one of the first, if not the first, bases to do that.”

Other than switching from “Air” to “Space,” Schiess said the designations will retain their historic references.

“We’re not going to change the Patrick part,” he said of the beachside installation, which is named after Gen. Mason Patrick, first chief of the Air Force’s predecessor. “And we would never think about changing the name of Cape Canaveral.”

Schiess said he also anticipates a name change for the 45th Space Wing itself, though no final decisions have been made. Uniform updates and designs are still being decided, too.

Space Force!

Posted in Just Too Cool, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged
13 Comments

Germans go to the zoo. Synod (“walking together”) and heresy. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

Weird German bishop (tautology?) of Osnabrück, Franz-Josef Bode, is for pretty everything that would tear the Church apart and remake her in the secularist image so hotly desired by the Left.

At katolisch.de we find that Bode, emerging puffed up from the Synod (“walking together”) has said that – I am not making this up

Christus sei “für uns Mensch, nicht Mann geworden”.

Christ became a human being for us, not a man.

Bode was paired up with a woman theologian Dorothea Sattler, who quipped that it is new to emphasize Jesus’ manhood. God could have become a woman, but it was only sociological conditions that … I dunno… forced? God to become a man.

Moreover,

“it was always about the incarnation of God, not about becoming man. The question of gender was of no relevance to theology of salvation in the history of tradition.”

This is both a lie and heresy.

This, folks, is what is coming from the German Church.  Caput malorum omnium.

This is what has been driving the Germans to force an agenda onto the whole Church through their virtual colonial approach to the people of the Amazon.

Consider the implications.

  • God has to bend to sociological conditions that we set.  We can constrain God.
  • Maleness is irrelevant to Christ’s salvific mission.
  • There is nothing particularly male about what He did that wasn’t, necessarily, culturally conditioned.
  • No one has paid much attention to Christ’s maleness until recently, but we can put all that aside as not relevant.
  • If sex (not gender) is irrelevant, then every aspect of the Church, in effect, can be overhauled, beginning with priesthood.

Once again we find the demonic attack on the priesthood that the Lutherans launched. Protestantism, deep down, is a sustained attack on the priesthood and Mass.

They might has well be dancing around a golden calf in that German synodal process.

Remember: In the history of the world only the Jews referred to God as male and only they had male priesthood.  In other highly patriarchal cultures there were also priestesses.  Not so with the Jews.  That in itself was not unnoticed over the millennia. Moreover, where there is a female priesthood there is, inevitably, temple prostitution.

Where are our LEVITES?

Exodus 32

And the people seeing that Moses delayed to come down from the mount, gathering together against Aaron, said: Arise, make us gods, that may go before us: for as to this Moses, the man that brought us out of the land of Egypt, we know not what has befallen him. [2] And Aaron said to them: Take the golden earrings from the ears of your wives, and your sons and daughters, and bring them to me. [3] And the people did what he had commanded, bringing the earrings to Aaron. [4] And when he had received them, he fashioned them by founders’ work, and made of them a molten calf. And they said: These are thy gods, O Israel, that have brought thee out of the land of Egypt. [5] And when Aaron saw this, he built an altar before it, and made proclamation by a crier’s voice, saying: Tomorrow is the solemnity of the Lord.

[6] And rising in the morning, they offered holocausts, and peace victims, and the people sat down to eat, and drink, and they rose up to play. [In other words, an orgy] [7] And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: Go, get thee down: thy people, which thou hast brought out of the land of Egypt, hath sinned. [8] They have quickly strayed from the way which thou didst shew them: and they have made to themselves a molten calf, and have adored it, and sacrificing victims to it, have said: These are thy gods, O Israel, that have brought thee out of the land of Egypt. [9] And again the Lord said to Moses: See that this people is stiffnecked: [10] Let me alone, that my wrath may be kindled against them, and that I may destroy them, and I will make of thee a great nation.

[11] But Moses besought the Lord his God, saying: Why, O Lord, is thy indignation kindled against thy people, whom thou hast brought out of the land of Egypt, with great power, and with a mighty hand? [12] Let not the Egyptians say, I beseech thee: He craftily brought them out, that he might kill them in the mountains, and destroy them from the earth: let thy anger cease, and be appeased upon the wickedness of thy people. [13] Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, thy servants, to whom thou sworest by thy own self, saying: I will multiply your seed as the stars of heaven: and this whole land that I have spoken of, I will give to your seed, and you shall possess it for ever. [14] And the Lord was appeased from doing the evil which he had spoken against his people. [15] And Moses returned from the mount, carrying the two tables of the testimony in his hand, written on both sides,

[16] And made by the work of God: the writing also of God was graven in the tables. [17] And Josue hearing the noise of the people shouting, said to Moses: The noise of battle is heard in the camp. [Hebrew euphemism for sex in concert with the worship of pagan idols.] [18] But he answered: It is not the cry of men encouraging to fight, nor the shout of men compelling to flee: but I hear the voice of singers. [19] And when he came nigh to the camp, he saw the calf, and the dances: and being very angry, he threw the tables out of his hand, and broke them at the foot of the mount: [20] And laying hold of the calf which they had made, he burnt it, and beat it to powder, which he strowed into water, and gave thereof to the children of Israel to drink.

[And now things get serious.  Whereas before all the men were priests, God strips them of priesthood and confers it on the Levites.]

[21] And he said to Aaron: What has this people done to thee, that thou shouldst bring upon them a most heinous sin? [22] And he answered him: Let not my lord be offended: for thou knowest this people, that they are prone to evil. [23] They said to me: Make us gods, that may go before us: for as to this Moses, who brought us forth out of the land of Egypt, we know not what is befallen him. [24] [And now the lamest excuse ever uttered in the Bible.] And I said to them: Which of you hath any gold? and they took and brought it to me: and I cast it into the fire, and this calf came out. [25] And when Moses saw that the people were naked, (for Aaron had stripped them by occasion of the shame of the filth, and had set them naked among their enemies,) [26] Then standing in the gate of the camp, he said: If any man be on the Lord’s side let him join with me. And all the sons of Levi gathered themselves together unto him: [27] [Note well!  This is tough.] And he said to them: Thus saith the Lord God of Israel: Put every man his sword upon his thigh: go, and return from gate to gate through the midst of the camp, and let every man kill his brother, and friend, and neighbour. [28] And the sons of Levi did according to the words of Moses, and there were slain that day about three thousand men. [29] And Moses said: You have consecrated your hands this day to the Lord, every man in his son and in his brother, that a blessing may be given to you. [The ordination of the Levites was through an anointing with blood.  Their ordination was the bloodbath of the idolatrous.] [30] And when the next day was come, Moses spoke to the people: You have sinned a very great sin: I will go up to the Lord, if by any means I may be able to entreat him for your crime.

[31] And returning to the Lord, he said: I beseech thee: this people hath sinned a heinous sin, and they have made to themselves gods of gold: either forgive them this trespass, [32] Or if thou do not, strike me out of the book that thou hast written. [33] And the Lord answered him: He that hath sinned against me, him will I strike out of my book: [34] But go thou, and lead this people whither I have told thee: my angel shall go before thee. And I in the day of revenge will visit this sin also of theirs. [35] The Lord therefore struck the people for the guilt on occasion of the calf which Aaron had made.

Because of this bloody episode, spiritual adultery by idol worship, God loaded onto the people all the additional laws of the Book of Leviticus.  He stripped all the men of their priesthood and gave it to the Levites.

Posted in Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , ,
17 Comments

READ: NRO piece by Daniel J. Mahoney, “Pope Francis, Wayward Shepherd”

First, an image to set the scene.

Let’s now move along.

In the wake of posting about Robert Royal’s roundup of books on Francis, I read today at NRO a piece by Daniel J. Mahoney, “Pope Francis, Wayward Shepherd”.

The article is more than about ways in which Francis seems to be leading the Church into a secular NGO mode of action, obsessed with climate change, and through it, even population control (what the hell is Jeffrey Sachs doing at the Vatican all the time?) and the glossing over of perennial teachings.

It is about a wider element.

[…]

Political correctness — and hostility to the West as the West — pervades a good deal of what this papacy says and does.

[…]

Royal refers to these juvenile ideological clichés, and predictable policies, as manifestations of “simplistic progressivism.” This is a Vatican that conflates the truth of Christ with a “religion of humanity” that has become a substitute for a religion that affirms transcendence. Sober political thinking is not much in evidence, nor even a modicum of realism and moderation in human affairs. Love and charity have been hopelessly politicized, confused with a sentimentality that excuses every excess carried out in the name of a perfected “humanity.” When one sides with an atheistic and totalitarian regime that endangers the children of God, one has entered into morally and theologically troubled territory, indeed.

What is responsible for this steady evacuation of, this open assault on, classical Christian orthodoxy and moral-political good sense? To begin with, Francis and his cohort are partisans of a “new Christianity” that pays insufficient attention to the horizon that Christians call “eternity.

[…]

“The silence of most of the bishops in the Catholic Church on this embarrassing but destructive mixture of progressivism, reflexive activism, and casual dismissal of the deepest wisdom of the Church is disconcerting.”

And…

Instead of kneeling before the world and succumbing to the allure of a late modernity that has no place for elevating conscience and binding truth, Cardinal Sarah calls on the Church to fearlessly witness to the truth about man. It must witness, with evangelical zeal and fidelity to the natural moral law, against the terrible perversions that are gender theory and transhumanism. They are the “pernicious face” of totalitarianism in the 21st century since they, too, “hope to mutilate and control [human] nature.” The Church now should have one paramount mission: to defend human nature, moral responsibility, and a conscience informed by natural and divine truth (not pernicious self-will) as precious gifts that come from the Lord of Hosts. Sarah puts it so well: Men and women of good will would respond with enthusiasm and gratitude to a “splendid act of courage by the Church” to recover the true sources of human liberty, dignity, and responsibility. Without such an act of courage, the progressives will lead the Church of Christ down a path of gradual renunciation of everything that defines the Christian Church as a vehicle of divine truth, of the moral law, and of liturgical fidelity to the worship of the Most High. And as he argues in a new book, Des profondeurs de nos coeurs (From the Depths of Our Hearts), written with a contribution by Benedict XVI, the new Christianity undermines an authentic and faithful understanding of celibate priesthood, of priesthood truly sanctified by God. [US Pre-Order Soon HERE for 12 March 2020 release! – FRENCH HERE]

By becoming shrill, dogmatic, and moralistic practitioners of a politically correct religion of humanity, the Church follows the path of perdition. The political philosopher Leo Strauss, speaking in 1964 at the University of Detroit, a Jesuit institution, said that the Roman Catholic Church was the last remaining spiritual body or institution to truly appreciate all the pitfalls of a modern project that openly and self-consciously rejected natural right in the classical and Christian senses of the term. Strauss made that remark at the very moment when important elements within the Church were succumbing to modernity at its least wise, least sober, least admirable. This is what the political philosopher Eric Voegelin so aptly called “modernity without restraint.”

For generations to come, the Catholic Church will bear the shame of its capitulation before a totalitarian regime in Beijing, a regime that demands loyalty to state power and Communist ideology before fidelity to the saving grace of Christ.

[…]

It’s a sobering assessment.

On a macro level there is not a lot must of us can do, even though we know that prayer and charity have no borders.

On the micro level, the sphere we reach each day, there is a lot we can do in word and in deed, dicta et facta.

One thing we must do is assess where we are and where we want to go.   The piece above describes: “partisans of a ‘new Christianity’ that pays insufficient attention to the horizon that Christians call ‘eternity.’”

In geometry, when two lines diverge from the same point, the farther they extend, the farther apart they get.

In a journey, if you take a road leading the opposite direction of your destination, the farther you go from it.  If you are smart, and you really want to get to your goal, you have to turn around and find the correct road.  If you are smart.  Or … if you are not perverse.

I think that a false road was purposely created for our naive feet by the City of Man’s diabolical civil engineers and we were lead astray.

But we’ve now had time to study the map.

Heaven.  Not heaven.

On the path of the Church?  On the path of the world?

Do you like the direction we are going?

Friends, stay close to the sacraments.

Find good reading sources.

Form small “base communities”, to study good sources.

Participate well in your sacred liturgical worship.

Fathers, get serious about catechesis and get those altars turned back the right way.  Preach about the Blessed Sacrament in such a way that people of their own accord will never want to receive in the hand again.  Put rails back in.  Learn more about who you really are by learning the Traditional Latin Mass.  I virtually guarantee a knock on effect in your parish.

And hear confessions.

And GO TO CONFESSION!

Posted in Francis, Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
7 Comments

Sequel to Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ”? RESURRECTION

This is pretty exciting.  I read at Messa in Latino that Mel Gibson is making a sequel to The Passion Of Christ about the Resurrection.

The cast should come back for this next offering.

Anyone know anything else for sure?

For the great movie…

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged
21 Comments

IL MESSAGGERO: Archbp. Gänswein sacked? #BOOKGATE continues – UPDATED

UPDATE 6 Feb 2020:

Some updates at the bottom: how other newsies are treating this.

___ Originally published on: Feb 6, 2020 at 02:43

The Italian daily Il Messaggero of 6 February has run with the story that was in the German Die Tagespost, namely, that Francis has sidelined the head of the Pontifical Household, Archbp. Georg Gänswein, who is also the private secretary to Benedict XVI, because of the dust up over the book Benedict co-authored with Card. Sarah.  That book argues against what some people claim: Francis wanted to open the possibility of “married priests” through the upcoming Apostolic Exhortation following the Amazon Synod (“walking together”).   It was thought – based on a leak repeated without solid confirmation – that Francis would undermine priestly celibacy through the approval of “viri probati“.

That said, it seems that the upcoming document won’t break with tradition about celibacy.  Some folks got out over their skiis a little too far.

It is possible that the document did contain something about celibacy, but maybe the exceptionally good Sarah/Benedict book (out in French, in English, March) threw a spanner into the works and changes were made to the text.

The story goes that Francis was/is furious at Gänswein for #Bookgate. Gänswein has now effectively vanished from sight, been “disappeared” as it were.

In any event, here is the page from the 6 February Il Messaggero.

Gänswein has been seen less and less and is now, apparently, on a leave from his duties in the Pontifical Household for an indeterminate time.  However, Il Messaggero says that this is because of a “normal change” a new “redistribution of internal work”.

The writer at Il Messaggero used a grim Spanish word for Gänswein: “Una sorta di desaparecido … A kind of disappeared.”  As in “los desaparecidos” during the Argentinian “Dirty War”.  People considered to be ideological threats to the junta were “disappeared”, dropped alive out of airplanes into the Atlantic.  No bodies. No crime.  Just a shrug.

The writer of the piece guesses that another “head will roll”: Card. Sarah.   However, the writer also mentions that Sarah is just a few months from the obligatory age of retirement and it is unlikely that Francis will renew his mandate.

The writer for Il Messaggero archly concluded:

“The ultraconservative fringe of the Church which brought some of the bishops of the United States to threaten schism is in a state of alarm, but the text of Pope Francis (after some corrections [alcune correzioni], it seems) appears not to create any openings.  It seems that there isn’t a hint of married priests.”

American bishops?  Threat of schism?  After some corrections?  Perhaps the book made the difference.

However, it remains that Archbp. Gänswein is – right now – still officially Prefect of the Household.

Right.

And Card. Burke is – right now – still officially the Cardinalis Patronus of the Sovereign Order of Malta.

Speaking of desaparecido, as Il Messaggero suggested, at only 63 years of age Gänswein has perhaps not been given a golden parachute.

__

You should read this book, which caused a good deal of the sort of “mess” which Francis invited.  See what the fuss is about.

¡Hagan lío!

From the Depths of our Hearts

US Pre-Order Soon HERE for 12 March 2020 release! – FRENCH HERE

UPDATE: later 6 Feb 2020:

Die Tagespost today says that Gänswein has a leave of absence and that the papal spox says there are no openings for “viri probati” in the upcoming Exhortation.   But!  They end on a hopeful note for the libs!  Francis doesn’t have to use an Exhortation to announce married priests or deaconettes!  He could create “new commissions” to study these questions, and announce them in an apostolic letter.  Uh huh.

Il Fatto Quotidiano seems to go with the punishment scenario

Corriere della Sera goes with punishment, after a looong ramble to fill column inches.

From Il Simografo another take.   They try to “decode” what is going on with a simpler answer.  Benedict XVI’s health is declining and it was decided that Gänswein would take time off – he is still officially head of the papal household – to take care of Benedict.

 

 

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , , ,
10 Comments

BREAKING: SECRET PROTEST CALLED AGAINST FUTURE PAPAL CONCLAVE APP

On the heels of posting this – BREAKING: IOWA CAUCUSES AND PAPAL CONCLAVES! – I just received the following…

February 5, 2020 – (ROME, ITALY)

An unconfirmed source reported on Tuesday, 4 February, that Pope Francis has hired the Iowa Democrat Party to develop an app for use in the next papal conclave to count the votes of the cardinal electors. The progressive pontiff reportedly desires that conclaves should have more transparency.

The app, which was developed by former members of the 2016 Clinton campaign, caused widespread confusion during the recent Iowa caucuses, jeopardizing their future.

Conclaves, held in the Vatican’s Sistine Chapel, are historically closed meetings, literally meaning “lockup up together”.  By church law, electronic devices are not permitted in conclaves.  Many think that conclaves, like political caucuses, are outdated and undemocratic.

An anonymous informant stated that there is being organized a secret, by invitation only, protest at the development of the conclave app.  According that sole source, protesters will stand silently in a line at the entrance to the Vatican Museum, which is the usual public access to the Sistine Chapel.

“It should be moving,” the organizer said.  “This cannot be permitted.  Action is needed.  The integrity of conclaves is sacrosanct.   There mustn’t be leaks.”

An expert on the history of conclaves, Prof. Mario Rossi of Rome’s La Sapienza University, reacted to the news of the conclave app.  “Not good. The risks of disinformation would multiply by orders of magnitude.   Imagine the confusion of  voting miscounts because of a compromised app.  White smoke.  Then black smoke.  Then white again.  Chaos.”

The Vatican’s papal spokesman was questioned about the conclave app and Francis’s determination to bring transparency to conclaves.  At the time of publication no response had yet been received.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
4 Comments

ASK FATHER: Priest says “for all” rather than “for many”

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Can a priest change the words”for many “ to “for all?” The priest said it’s optional.

No. A priest may not by his own authority change the liturgical texts. That would be a liturgical abuse. The priest does NOT have the option to do that.

Furthermore, “for all” is precisely what the Latin “pro multis” does not mean.  “For all” is precisely what the Church has officially taught for centuries that should not be said.

And this liturgical abuse is graver than others by the fact that it concerns the form of the sacrament, the words of consecration of the Precious Blood.

Since it seems that you have already spoken to the priest about it, you should get a recording of the priest saying this and send it to the local bishop. If that does not produce results, send it to the Congregation for Divine Worship in Rome.

What that priest is doing does not invalidate the consecration, but it is still a big deal.

The Church, much less an individual priest or bishop or Pope, cannot blithely change the language of the text, which has an official Latin foundation, from pro multis to pro universis (for all). That would explicitly contradict the Church’s teaching as expressed in Latin by the Council of Trent (cf. Catechism of the Council of Trent, Part II, 4). Such a change would contradict doctrine and not simply change emphasis about an aspect of that doctrine. The English must reflect the Latin.

UPDATE 6 Feb 2020:

A good point has been made in the comments.

It could be that the priest just slipped back into an older mode.

I remember an old priest who, late in the pontificate of John Paul II, slipped into “for Paul our Pope”.

I myself have to concentrate hard on the rare occasions when I say the Novus Ordo, not to do certain things, which are now powerfully wired in as muscle memory.  And even though I have written extensively on the propers of the Novus Ordo, the new translation of the ordinary is still “new” to me.

So, it is possible that the priest in question just slipped.

However, the questioner said she asked the priest and he responded that he had the option.

No.  He really doesn’t.  That suggests that he knows what he is doing.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
19 Comments

Rush has lung cancer. Catholics owe him BIG TIME. Wherein Fr. Z rants. ACTION ITEM!

Rush Limbaugh has advanced lung cancer.  He made the sad announcement yesterday.

ACTION ITEM: Please pray for a complete, swift, durative miraculous cure for him, perhaps through the intercession of Ven. Augustus Tolton.

Every reader here, every committed conservative, faithful Catholic in these USA and elsewhere, owes Rush a huge debt.

Some of you are young and don’t remember what main stream media was like back in the day.  It was dominated by few, extraordinarily liberal outlets.

Then came Rush.

He busted the liberal hegemony.

I think he made it possible for the emergence of a new conservative movement in general and, therefore, in the Catholic sphere.

Talk radio changed everything.  And there really isn’t much of a lib talk radio.   The same goes in the Catholic blogosphere.

When ideas are truly exchanged, libs flee.

Rush was the trailblazer.  He developed a new genre in radio.

Last night I heard Mark Steyn, frequent sub for Rush, say that once when he was in Australia he was called up to fill in for Rush.  He told the PM there that he had to go back to these USA for Rush.  When Steyn remarked that Rush, then, had 25-30 million listeners, the PM said that that Rush had more listeners than there were Australians.

I once had a conversation with the late Card. George of Chicago.  He asked me how many readers I had.  When I told him, he was surprised.  He said, “You have more readers in a day than I have in a month.”

The same phenomenon, but in different settings.

It is unassailable that Rush has a galactic influence on the media.  He made it possible that more than one side of issues be aired.

Older folks might not have grasped completely what was going on back then.  Younger people did.   Libs are still bumfuzzled.

Those of us who were young when Rush started, are older now.  We remember what it was like to experience this shift in the media.  We know what Rush did and will continue to do for as long as he can.

Again, please pray for a complete, swift, durative miraculous cure for Rush Limbaugh through the intercession of Ven. Augustus Tolton.

 

Posted in ACTION ITEM!, PRAYER REQUEST, The Coming Storm, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , ,
30 Comments

BREAKING: IOWA CAUCUSES AND PAPAL CONCLAVES!

I just received the following…

February 4, 2020 – (ROME, ITALY)

A source within the Vatican, whose identity must remain secret, divulged that Pope Francis has hired the Iowa Democrats to develop an app for the next conclave.

In the past, some have questioned the secretive conclave method of choosing a Pope, calling it outdated and non-viable.

It is hoped that the use of this app will provide for unprecedented transparency in the historically closed-door process and increase confidence in the validity of future papal elections.

Los Angeles Times reports that the Iowa app was originally developed by veterans of the Clinton campaign.

Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI was unavailable for comment.

Posted in Lighter fare |
9 Comments

ACTION ITEM: Another young family man with ALS, “Lou Gherig’s Disease” – UPDATED

A little while ago, I posted about a young priest with ALS, Fr. Dana Christensen.  He has asked people to pray to Ven. Fulton Sheen for a miraculous complete cure.

Another affliction of ALS has stuck another young man I know, Rintaro Arakane, who does IT for the Diocese of Madison.  This is a great young man, with a family, a wife and infant daughter.

A GOFUNDME drive has been organized for Rintaro.

>>HERE<<

For example, how about praying to Ven. Augustus Tolton for a complete, swift and durative cure for Rintaro’s ALS?

Please couple that with giving up less than what you might spend on a Big Mac meal – heck, give up a meal! – for a donation?

It can be more than a Big Mac, too.

Will you help?   Lot’s people making even small donations turn into a powerful force.

You’ve done this often to great effect.  This is one of the ways this blog can bring forth corporal and spiritual works of mercy.

Tell them Fr. Z sent you!

The campaign was started a few days ago.  Let’s see if we can’t hit that mark so that they can raise the amount!

Here’s where they are now.

UPDATE 4 February 2020:

You did it!

I hope they raise the fundraiser goal.

Posted in ACTION ITEM! | Tagged ,
1 Comment