“Katonda!” The Feast of St Charles Lwanga, Martyr. Best patron saint for LGBT month!

St Charles Lwanga

“Katonda!”

 

This year today is the Feast of Corpus Christi, but in 2022 I will with real pleasure be able to celebrate, using the Traditional Missale Romanum, the Feast of St. Charles Lwanga.  The decree Cum sanctissima allows for the celebration of Saints canonized after 1962 provided that the day is not some feast that would outweigh it.

Here is what I posted on St. Charles in the past.

If you don’t know this saint, be sure to read it.  It is powerful.


As “Pride” month continues…

Today is the feast of St. Charles Lwanga and companions, murder victims and martyrs of homosexual depravity.

Today we might also contemplate the various ways in which the State is encroaches in our lives in this regard and tries to force us to do things that are repugnant to nature and to God’s laws.

Today we should especially ask God to forgive and convert all those who in any way have contributed to or succumbed to any aspect of what is rightly called toxic “gender theory” and called demonic, due to its origin.

More on that HERE and HERE and HERE.

Today is the feast day of a saint, who died as a martyr especially because he resisted a sodomite king, who was furious that he and many children wouldn’t have homosexual sex with him.

St. Charles Lwanga and many other martyrs died between 1885 and 1887 in Uganda. They were beatified in 1920 and canonized by Pope Paul VI in 1964.

In 1879 the White Fathers were working successfully as missionaries in Uganda.  They were, at first well received by King Mutesa.

Then there came a new pharaoh, as it were.

Mutesa died and his son, Mwanga, took over.  He was a ritual pedophile.

Charles Lwanga, a 25 year old man who was a catechist, forcefully protected boys in his charge from the king’s sodomite advances.

The king had murdered an Anglican Bishop and tried to get his page, who was protected by Joseph Mukasa, later beheaded for his trouble.  On the night of the martyrdom of Joseph Mukasa, Lwanga and other pages sought out the White Fathers for baptism. Some 100 catechumens were baptized.

A few months later, King Mwanga ordered all the pages to be questioned to find out if they were being catechized.  15 Christians 13 and 25 identified themselves.  When the King asked them if they were willing to keep their faith, They answered in unison, “Until death!”

They were bound together and force marched for 2 days to Namugongo where they were to be burned at the stake.  On the way, Matthias Kalemba, one of the eldest boys, exclaimed, “God will rescue me. But you will not see how he does it, because he will take my soul and leave you only my body.”  He was cut to pieces and left him by the road.

When they reached Nanugongo, they were kept tied together for seven days while the executioners prepared the wood for the fire.

On 3 June 1886 (that year the Feast of the Ascension… therefore a Thursday), Charles Lwanga was separated from the others and burned at the stake. The executioners burnt his feet until only the charred stumps remained.  He survived.  His tormentors promised that they would let him go if he renounced his Faith. Charles refused saying, “You are burning me, but it is as if you are pouring water over my body.”  They set him on fire.

As flames engulfed him he said in a loud voice, “Katonda! – My God!”

“Katonda!”  … Better than “Wakanda!”

His companions were also burned together the same day. They prayed and sang hymns.

Charles Lwanga and companions died for their Faith and because they resisted the intrinsically evil of homosexual sex.

[…]

Charles Lwanga, pray for us!

Katonda!

st_charles_lwanga_photo

Thanks to the Great Roman™.  Here are a couple of shots of the canonization ceremony for St. Charles and companions…. during Vatican II.

Quite self-referential and maybe even neo-Pelagian, I’d say.


Meanwhile….

 

Posted in Linking Back, Modern Martyrs, Saints: Stories & Symbols, Sin That Cries To Heaven | Tagged
6 Comments

ASK FATHER: Cursed by a witch through a dating site. Now really bad things are happening.

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Hi Father,

Here is a hard one, and a subject you would probably rather avoid.  But I truly need to talk to someone and I hope you can offer a few words of advice.

What happened was that I was using an international dating site and chatting with women around the world, just kind of fun and harmless.  A middle aged black women from Sudan messaged me and I responded. We chatted just a few seconds amiably and she asked if I had a picture.  Well, stupidly, I sent her a picture of myself and my Golden Retriever. She immediately disconnected from the website. Then a couple days later reappeared there and said “Good Evening. I ran out of airtime.”  However that was not the case.

I was now getting red splotches on my arms and hands and just a day after this my back gave out and I have had to begin using a cane to get around. Several times in my house my nose started bleeding spontaneously.  I have had a number of very strange uncanny experiences right in my own home (I can send you physical evidence of some of this by email). Worst of all, I am no longer able to sleep at night. I have to take Ambien or there is not one minute of sleep, night after night. Ambien can only be taken short-term.

This will gradually wear me down and I am frankly scared. If this goes on indefinitely my health will collapse. The idea that a woman in Sudan, a witch presumably, can or would do this to an American on the other side of the world for no obvious reason is bizarre I know. But it has happened to me and I don’t know what to do. I need some advice badly.

Many thanks for any insights you may be able to provide.

An “international dating site”.  What could go wrong?

Firstly, check in with your doctor.

I took this seriously and consulted an highly experienced exorcist.

His advice.

1. Order this book: HERE

Say the pertinent prayers for your case – there are many there. Do a severance of soul ties.  “In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, I (state his name) renounce and reject all the legitimate soul ties all illegitimate soul ties with the Sudanese witch. Everything I gave her, I take back. Everything she gave me, I return to her. In the name of the father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.” (THREE TIMES).

2. Contact the diocese and ask to meet with the diocesan exorcist. If the diocese refuses to help, seek to seek a local priest who is willing to do prayers of deliverance and minor exorcisms, using this book: HERE

3. If they all refuse to help contact the Society of the Most Sorrowful Mother: https://dolorans.org

Comment moderation is ON.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Si vis pacem para bellum! | Tagged , , , ,
15 Comments

Daily Rome (not!) Shot 177


In the first days
of the year 2020
an unknown virus
which came from China
sewed distress and many dead
in the whole world.
Moreover, the Palio of July
and August was not run.
This stone is intended to call to mind
this terrible occurrence.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on Daily Rome (not!) Shot 177

A repressive document against the Traditional Latin Mass would be a disaster for those who promulgate and enforce it

At Catholic Culture Phil Lawler has some thoughts about the rumored document that would enervate Benedict XVI’s “emancipation proclamation” Summorum Pontificum.  Such a document, as rumor has it, could be a kind of ecclesiastical “slave act of 2021”* which would return diocesan priests to forced servitude to their ring-wearing masters in the big house.

Lawler argues that such a document would be a “disaster”, and not just for those who desire the Traditional Latin Mass, the number of whom is growing very fast.   In some places it is the most vibrant sector of the Church’s life due to the increasingly dedicated participation of young people and, especially, young families.

It is Lawler’s view that the “disaster” also resides in the contradiction that the document implies.  Benedict XVI said that the TLM was never abrogated and said that “what earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too, and it cannot be all of a sudden entirely forbidden or even considered harmful”.

If this rumored document is released, to the detriment of all these priests and people, a signal of traumatic discontinuity will be sent through the whole Church.  As Lawler puts it:

[I]f Pope Francis can contradict the teaching of Pope Benedict, what is to prevent a future Pontiff from contradicting Pope Francis? Anyone who is genuinely interested in preserving papal authority (as opposed to gaining a temporary advantage in intramural debates) should recognize the mischief this draft document could cause.

[…]

If he contradicts the teaching of previous Pontiffs—if he suggests that what was once sacred is sacred no longer—he attacks the base on which his own authority rests.

In Rome there is a saying: “Morto ‘n papa se ne fa un antro. … A Pope dies, you make another.”  Popes come and go.  If one Pope, through sheer use of force, overturns the work of his predecessor, the next Pope could do the same to his work. And so on and so on.  The whole institution is undermined.  This works on every level, in the Church: diocesan chanceries… parishes.  A new pharaoh bishop or pastor arrives and – BAM! – he overturns what his predecessor worked to build.

Ironically, those who want to bring down a sledge-hammer on the aspirations of young people and so many priests spent the pontificates of John Paul II and Benedict XVI whining about top-down use of power.

But that is the sort of hypocrisy with which the Left rolls.

It is possible that the rumors about a new “slave act of 2021” are part of a “false flag” campaign of disinformation, to discomfit and incite those who have traditional aspirations.   It is possible.

But, as the Romans say, “Fidasse è bbene, nun fidasse è mmejo”.

 

*The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was ” arguably the most hated and openly violated piece of federal legislation in the nation’s history.”

 

Posted in Si vis pacem para bellum!, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill |
19 Comments

RECENT POSTS and THANKS!

Things scroll off the main page pretty quickly, so here is a reminder of some recent posts.

Also, this is an opportunity to thank my benefactors.  Some of you have sent things from my wish list.  Some of you have signed up for my “200” project.  Some of you have sent ad hoc donations.  Some of you – I hope more of you! – use my link to enter Amazon for online shopping.  Some of you – I hope many more of you! – use my link to buy Mystic Monk Coffee.  Thank you VENMO donors!

Use phone camera

Every little bit helps and I am grateful to all of you.  As a matter of fact, in this truly chaotic time in my life, lots of big changes, your support – both spiritual and material – is a morale boost as I see it come in.

As a result, for a few weeks now I have been more regularly celebrating Holy Mass for my benefactors, whose names I note when I know them and whose names I don’t I commend to God who does.  Today, as a matter of fact, I will say Mass for my benefactors.  It is my duty and pleasure.

Please note that I exclude from the following list of links my daily . Click that to pull them up.

I am grateful to St. Joseph for his recent aid.  Get to know him.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on RECENT POSTS and THANKS!

NEW can. 1379 § 3 makes a canonical crime an attempt to ordain a woman to ANY of the three sacred orders (episcopate, priesthood, diaconate)

Yesterday I wrote about the new Book VI of the Latin Church’s Code of Canon Law. This new Book VI, dealing with offenses and punishments, completely replaces the older version. Some changes are mere rearranging. Others are more substantive. Yesterday I mentioned one of the substantive changes.

Can. 1379 § 3. Both a person who attempts to confer a sacred order on a woman, and the woman who attempts to receive the sacred order, incur a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; a cleric, moreover, may be punished by dismissal from the clerical state.

However, this new canon makes it explicit: women cannot be ordained.   Women cannot be ordained to any of the three sacred orders.  Period.  They cannot be ordained as bishops, priests or deacons.

The diaconate (order of deacon) is a sacred order.  It is one of the three grades of Holy Orders.

Two “deaconette” study Commissions in Rome notwithstanding, if there were any serious notion of a possible ordination of women to the diaconate, this canon would not have been included in the new Book VI.  Instead, in the interim, the older language would have been retained or expunged.  But, no.  It was made more explicit still.

And please note that word “attempts”. “A person who attempts to ordain…”.  That excludes the suggestion that the ordination would be valid but illicit.   The point of “attempt” means that the “attempt” fails and the woman in question is not ordained.  But it is still such a grave crime even to try, that it incurs the censure by the fact of attempting it.

The previous corresponding canon, in the now lame-duck Book VI, said that anyone who “simulates the administration of a sacrament” was to be punished with a just penalty.  Any attempt to ordain a woman to any sacred order would be simulation of a sacrament.  The sacrament is not conferred, even though what happened simulated the rite of ordination.

That said, because there are some people who go on and on and on and on and on about the ordination of women either to the priesthood or to the diaconate, this new canon removes all doubt: woman cannot be ordained to any of the Holy Orders.

Other commentators, canonists, have noted this too.  NB: “graviora delicta“.

It is a canonical crime to attempt to ordain a woman to any of the three Holy Orders.

Let us accept this new canon with both gratitude, because it gives strong guidance to those who obsessively push for the ordination of women, and also resolve, because it underscores our own responsibility in fostering vocations and in supporting those who are ordained.

Posted in Canon Law, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World | Tagged , ,
10 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 176

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
1 Comment

ACTION ITEM: Fathers, do not wait any longer.  It’s time.  Get things in gear NOW.

I’ll lead off with a mind exercise.  It is possible that the rumored document that would undo Benedict XVI’s “emancipation proclamation” Summorum Pontificum is actually founded on a well-constructed campaign of disinformation.  It could be a psy-op designed to get “trads” to over-react, rear up in defiance before anything is promulgated.  Like a “false flag” operation, it would give the powers-that-be cover to enact what they want because, after all, “look how they are behaving”.   Göring bragged that the Nazis actually started the Reichstag Fire in order to be able to blame the Communists, whom they then had an excuse to repress.   A recent alleged “insurrection” was probably a “false flag” operation.   These folks are good as this sort of thing.

That’s the mind exercise.

Paix Liturgique and The Remnant are writing about the rumored, still rumored, document by which restrictions would be reasserted over Benedict XVI’s – who is still alive – “emancipation proclamation”.

The document supposedly, if The Remnant is correct in what it as heard, could transfer control over the use of the Traditional Roman Rite away from the “Fourth Section” of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments (CDW).  The CDW under-secretary, Aurelio García Macías, a bishop, could theoretically be the one to implement it.

The Remnant speculates that the document would be aimed “to thwart the growth of the Traditional Latin Mass and other sacraments particularly among diocesan clergy.”

It is true.  It IS growing among diocesan clergy.  Rapidly, in some places.

This is incredibly scary for those who hate the “emancipation proclamation” that is Summorum Pontificum and its amazing effects.

To halt the growth, to halt the fruits, they are willing to suspend the “emancipation proclamation” and return diocesan priests to the slave-state.

If, as it is said to have been in an early draft, the institutes and communities which use the Traditional Rite are removed from the supervision of the CDF and given over to the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, that would be… not very good.  Think, Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate.

This is June, the month dedicated to Most Sacred Heart of Jesus.

I’ve already posted a couple things today about intensifying your prayer life and even performing acts of reparation because of the spread of certain evils in society.

I am asking you to do more now.

By all means read what Paix Liturgique and The Remnant have offered.

The Remnant provides addresses for your respectful letters.  Remember: Write something edgy or nasty and you HURT EVERYONE.  If you can’t restrain yourself, DON’T write at all.  Don’t harm the cause because you want to vent.  How selfish would that be.  Think about it: “Your Eminence… Holiness… see?  This is the kind of letter these people are sending!  These are the sort of people who want to overturn Vatican II.  See how nasty and disrespectful they are?”

And KEEP WORKING.  Do more.  Do not panic.  Keep your cool.  Get organized and get TLMs established far and wide.

Fathers, do not wait any longer.  It’s time.  Do NOT let the perfect be the enemy of the good.  Get things in gear NOW.

 

 

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "How To..." - Practical Notes, ACTION ITEM! |
10 Comments

CRISIS: A Catholic response to “Pride Month”

Today I saw with disgust that the US Embassy to the Holy See in Rome has displayed a homosexuality flag.

At Crisis today there is a good piece entitled “The Catholic Response to ‘Pride Month'” by John A. Monaco.

After recounting the increasingly rapid incrementalism by which the homosexalist agenda is being shoved down everyone’s throats, the writer make positive suggestions for how we, as faithful Catholics, should comport ourselves in the face of incessant LGBTQ+ aggression.

[…]

What is the Catholic response to “Pride Month,” then? Certainly, it is not found in Ontario’s Catholic schools, nor is it found in Fr. Martin’s celebration and promotion of how “Pride Month” is congenial to Catholicism. Nor can a Catholic in good conscience march in “Pride Month’s” scantily-clad parades and tolerate the LGBT community’s attempts to redefine the family, love, and compassion.

Aggressive protest measures, such as burning the rainbow flag, will only result in fifteen years of imprisonment. But as the oft-quoted motto goes, “silence is violence”; and to remain silent in the wake of a growing LGBT movement is to show one’s apathy and complicity in it. An appropriate and prudent response is required, one that will be consistent with traditional Catholic moral teaching and living. Three responses come to mind: prayer, penance, and proselytization.

It goes without saying that prayer is essential to the life of any Catholic. Prayer, in itself, may take many forms—our prayer may be mental, vocal, imaginative, devotional, liturgical, communal. Each of us have our own preferred methods and established habits.

What I suggest for June, then, is not merely to pray (I take that as a given), but to focus and add to our spiritual lives by praying for those who experience same-sex attractions and those involved in the homosexual lifestyle. This should not be interpreted in a condescending way (“I’ll pray for you, sinner!”), but rather in a truly loving way. Whether in our recitation of the rosary, Eucharistic adoration, or morning and nighttime prayers, let us make a conscious effort to bring same-sex attracted men and women—perhaps our friends, maybe our enemies—to the Lord by our intercession.

If June is a month of “pride” for the LGBT community, Catholics should counter the celebrated vice of pride with the oft-scorned virtue of humility. There is no better way to grow in this virtue than to remember in our minds and hearts those involved in certain lifestyles and carrying particular crosses.

[…]

Penance is often understood as a “making up” for one’s own wrongdoings. However, a true definition of penance avoids individualism. While we are solely to confess our own sins in the Sacrament of Penance, we are encouraged by the tradition to not only do penance for ourselves but for the whole world. Even if we ourselves are not involved in homosexual activity, we still are connected to those who are by virtue of our common humanity and, in many cases, our shared baptism.

We need not to be guilty of a specific wrongdoing to perform penance in satisfaction for the sins of others, especially for those sins which cry out to heaven for vengeance. After all, if Christ—who is sinless—suffered out of love for all humanity—how much more is it appropriate for we—who are sinners—to perform acts of voluntary penance on behalf of our fellow sinners? Admittedly, this is not a popular concept today. But it nonetheless remains true.

[…]

The final suggestion I have is that of proselytization. This is often considered a dirty word, especially in the post-conciliar epoch. Pope Francis has repeatedly warned against proselytization, preferring the more neutral term “evangelization” and “witness.” However, by proselytization, I am referring to its literal, etymological definition—coming from the Greek word prosêlutos meaning “to come over/towards.” In ancient times, it was understood to refer to someone who leaves one community for another, such as a Gentile convert to Judaism. Despite numerous attempts to suggest the contrary, one cannot simultaneously celebrate homosexual activity and remain committed to the teachings of Christ’s Church.

Whatever the fruits of the “New Evangelization,” it cannot include in them the conversion of society—if not all bishops and clergy in the Church—to the truth of human sexuality as illuminated by Christian identity. In fact, I would go as far to suggest that attempts by some Catholics to weaken Church teaching on homosexuality in the name of “accompaniment” and “dialogue” are more worthy of damnation than anything one might witness at any given “Pride” parade.

[…]

Interwoven in these snippets from his piece are good suggestions about concrete things to do and how to tie them to, for example, certain feast days.  Also, check his original piece at Crisis for the links he embedded.

It is important for all of us to engage this pervasive and growing problem in the positive ways the writer proposes.   Remember: the stakes are high and their homosexualist agenda won’t end at creating “welcoming communities”.  No.  There is a great deal more to the homosexualist agenda, ultimately, including demonic gender ideology and the lowering of the age of consent as well as the totalitarian principle that “everything not forbidden is compulsory”.

Homosexualists and abortion defenders are, at heart, totalitarians.    My friend Jennifer Roback Morse make this argument, demonstrating how their thought and agenda is, in essence, totalitarian in scope and tactic.   You can start with her book:

The Sexual State: How Elite Ideologies Are Destroying Lives and Why The Church Was Right All Along

US HERE – UK HERE

“Why The Church Was Right All Along…”.  Well… iuxta modum.  There is plenty of silence from our lots of our leaders on this and downright complicity from many.

I’ll add something to the writer’s suggestions.

GO TO CONFESSION!

Good initiatives ought always to start with a good examination of conscience and a good confession and good Holy Communion.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Si vis pacem para bellum!, Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
14 Comments

Heartbeat International and the Abortion Pill Rescue Network – SAFELY REVERSE the abortion after the first pill

There is a terrific piece at Epoch Times today about a teen-age mother who took the abortion pill, changed her mind, and used the abortion reversal treatment.

Yes, the pill process can be reversed… safely.

The young woman, now mother of two, works for a wonderful organization called Heartbeat International, which I have been involved with over the years.

Heartbeat has something called the Abortion Pill Rescue Network which has a 24/7 contact center for women who regret their abortion decision. Statistics show that more than 2,000 lives have been saved (and counting) through the abortion pill reversal protocol.

Half the abortions in these USA are from the “abortion pill”, which is in two parts, first, RU-486 (mifepristone) and then misoprostol.

If a woman has regret after taking the first pill, the pregnancy may be saved by the Abortion Pill Rescue Network.

This ought to be more widely known.  Spread the word.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Emanations from Penumbras, Just Too Cool | Tagged
2 Comments