Archbp. Burke describes why he built the Shrine to Our Lady – VIDEO

His Excellency Archbishop Raymond Burke, now Prefect of the Apostolic Segnatura, was once the Bishop of La Crosse.

During his time as bishop, he began the construction of a great shrine to Our Lady of Guadalupe.

The result is spectacular.   If you are ever in the area, you must visit.Twitter

Archbp. Burke returned to the Shrine this week for a Canon Law Conference.

During the course of the conference, His Excellency explained  why he build the Shrine.

UPDATE: I added a lower quality version, below.

BTW… Archbp. Burke speaks of the possibility that body of the late Fr. John Hardon, SJ might be eventually moved to the Shrine, if it is found to be opportune.   Fr Hardon’s Catechism (great for adults) was instrumental in my conversion to the Catholic Church.

Play

This little video, in which Archbp. Burke explains a project so close to his heart, really gives you a sense of the man’s intellect and piety.

Posted in Brick by Brick, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, PODCAzT | Tagged , ,
18 Comments

50K young people at Wednesday General Audience

From CNA:

More than 50,000 altar servers on Rome pilgrimage learn communion of faith

The pilgrimage that brought altar boys and girls [sic] to Rome en masse this week concluded on a high note at Wednesday’s general audience. Bringing tens of thousands of young people together in what appeared to be a small scale World Youth Day, the event showed the true colors of Church and the communion of its youth.

The final tally of participants included well over 50,000 young people from at least 17 European countries, who took over St. Peter’s Square during the general audience with the Pope. The altar servers were seen dancing, singing and generally enjoying the culminating event of their pilgrimage to Rome, organized by the Coetus Internationalis Ministrantium (CIM).

Youth from each country represented were distinguishable by the color of their pilgrims’ scarves. By far, the dominant shade seen in the square and all over the city in the last three days was the German participants’ vanilla-colored garment, one of which CIM president Bishop Martin Gächter offered to Pope Benedict XVI during the audience.

Austrian pilgrims with their yellow scarves were the second-most visible, while the 18 Lithuanians in pink and the six Albanians wearing blue were a much rarer sight among the over 80,000 total audience attendees.

More than 25,000 people who were not directly involved in the pilgrimage were also there to be with the Pope for a little over an hour.

Flags from Europe and many other countries waved ceaselessly during the audience, which was described in the context of the greater pilgrimage by L’Osservatore Romano editor Gian Vian as an "extraordinary Catholic party."

The colorful and happy gathering resembled the World Youth Day 2010 celebration Benedict XVI hosted in the square last March that drew 70,000 young people.

Many in the media have referred to the greater meaning of the event amidst Church scandals, as proof that the Catholic Church is strong, however, Bishop Gächter, in his words to Pope Benedict at the beginning of the audience, commented on the meaning of the pilgrimage through the eyes of the youth.

He said simply, "Here in Rome, we have learned to better know our communion of faith," a reality witnessed these days on the streets of the city.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Lighter fare, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
12 Comments

Does Speaker Pelosi’s hypocrisy have no limit?

Does the Speaker’s hypocrisy have no limit?

From CNA:

Speaker Pelosi avoids question about unborn Jesus’ right to life

Washington D.C., Aug 5, 2010 / 06:10 am (CNA).- Citing her previous references to the Incarnation, a journalist recently asked legal abortion supporter House Speaker [Catholic] Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) at what point she believes Jesus acquired the right to life. However, she declined to answer the question, saying she’d rather talk about the subject “in church.”

At a July 29 press briefing a reporter with CNSNews.com noted her remarks at the Catholic Community Conference on Capitol Hill, where she said that her favorite word was “the Word, as in the word made flesh.”  [READ THIS. Did the Speaker think people would forget?]

At the May 6 conference, Pelosi told her audience “you know the Gospel reference of the Word.” She added that people have to give voice to “what that means in terms of public policy that would be in keeping with the values of the Word.”

She cited the Prologue to the Gospel of John’s description of Jesus Christ, “the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us.”

At last week’s press briefing CNSNews.com reporter Jane McGrath asked: “So, when was the Word made flesh? Was it at the Annunciation, when Jesus was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit, as the Creed says, or was it at the Nativity when he was born of the Virgin Mary? And when did the Word get the right to life?

Speaker Pelosi, a self-described Catholic, replied: “Whenever it was, we bow our heads when we talk about it in church, and that’s where I’d like to talk about that.”  [I think the Speaker has forgotten that St. Paul forbids women to speak in church. And what was that point the Lord made about…. what was it again… something about tepid….  There was that other thing too… if I could only recall… something about denying me and denying you.  Gosh.  Gotta look that up.]

CNSNews.com reports that it sought clarification from Speaker Pelosi’s press secretary Nadeam Elshami, asking in an e-mail what the speaker’s position is on the question “Did Jesus have the right to life from the moment of conception?

Elshami replied in an e-mail “The speaker answered the question. Thanks.”  [No.  The Speaker did NOT answer that question.   I think we should keep asking until she does.]

The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that the Son of God assumed humanity and “made it his own, from his conception.” The Church also recognizes that the child has the right to life “from its conception.”

Speaker Pelosi favors legalized abortion and voted against a ban on partial-birth abortion.

WDTPRS applauds the journalists who put these questions to the Speaker.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
32 Comments

Concerning matters of taste

Here is a fun piece via the Laudator:

R.S. Thomas, Taste:

I had preferred Chaucer
but for the slop in his saucer:

or grave Edmund Spenser
moving formally as a dancer.

But Shakespeare’s cut and thrust,
I allow you, was a must

on my bookshelves; and after,
Donne’s thin, cerebral laughter.

Dryden I could not abide,
nor the mincing fratricide

of Pope. Jonathan Swift,
though courageous, had no uplift.

But Wordsworth, looking in the lake
of his mind, him I could take;

and Percy Shelley at times;
Byron, too, but only for his rhymes.

Tennyson? Browning? If I mention
them, it is but from convention,

despite the vowel technique
of the one, the other’s moral cheek.

Then Hardy, for many a major
poet, is for me just an old-stager,

shuffling about a bogus heath
cobwebbed with his Victorian breath.

And coming to my own century
with its critics’ compulsive hurry

to place a poet, I must smile
at the congestion at the turnstile

of fame, the faceless, formless amoeba
with the secretion of its vers libre.

Posted in Lighter fare |
3 Comments

QUAERITUR: confessing sins in both number and kind

From an older response.

A reader asked:

I’ve often heard priests say that when going to confession it’s important to confess sin both in kind and number. I recently went to confession though to a priest who told me at the beginning of the confession that he’s "not the kind of priest who wants to hear the number or frequency" and just to confess the sin. I didn’t know what to do. This seemed contrary to what the Church teaches and what I’ve been told in the past. Is it official teaching of the Church to confess sin both in kind and number, and if so, where can I find some references to this? How can a priest understand the gravity of the sin if he doesn’t know the frequency?

You are absolutely correct in your understanding that mortal sins are to be confessed, to the best of one’s ability, in both kind and number. This is very important and it is the ordinary way in which we are to make every auricular confession.

Emergencies can be different, but even after the emergency is over, we are still obliged to make a full confession in both kind and number.

In the 1983 Code of Canon Law we read:

Canon 988 – §1. A member of the Christian faithful is obliged to confess in kind and number all serious sins committed after baptism and not yet directly remitted through the keys of the Church nor acknowledged in individual confession, for which one is conscious after diligent examination of conscience.
§2. It is to be recommended to the Christian faithful that venial sins also be confessed.

The Council of Trent stated pretty clearly that

"To obtain the saving remedy of the sacrament of penance, according to the plan of our merciful God, the faithful must confess to a priest each and every grave sin that they remember after a diligent examination of conscience" (cf. sess. XIV de poenitentia cc. 7-8: COD 712).

Remember that each sacrament has both matter and form. The matter of the sacrament of penance is the telling of sins. While we are not obliged to include all sorts of circumstantial information surrounding the sins, we do need to indicate number and/or frequency, by number can change the severity of the sin and indicate to the confessor (and yourself) where your principle problems are.

Sometimes it will happen that your memory is not clear about the number of times you committed a sin. Just do your best, in that case. Even when your memory is faulty, if you do your best the sins you don’t remember or confess (through no fault of your own) are also indirectly remitted.

So, this priest was ABSOLUTELY WRONG to suggest that you do not need to confess sins also in number/frequency. As a matter of fact, he suggested that you violate the Church’s law in this matter. Confession is a matter of spiritual life or death.

You don’t mess around with confession.

Finally, there is nothing so bad that we can do that God cannot forgive. So, confess EVERYTHING!

Let’s mix a few analogies, to get at what a magnificent gift this sacrament is.

The confessional is not the rack. The confessional is a tribunal in which you are at the same time the prosecutor and the accused. The priest acts, in the person of Christ, as judge who exercises God’s loving mercy.

The confessional is an operating table on which our Savior, with your cooperation, acts as the Physician of your soul and heals your ills.  Sometimes that process of healing will have its painful moments.  But the relief at the end is worth any measure of discomfort.

Both these images, though on the surface seemingly stern or intimidating, lead through on the other side to blessed blessed relief.

There is nothing so fine as making a good confession, for it leads to the good reception of Holy Communion in the state of grace.

If you know you are not in the state of grace, don’t receive Holy Communion until you have made your good confession of all you sins in both number and kind.

You need to be in the habit of making a thorough examination of your conscience to be able to do this well.

See my 20 Tips for Making a Good Confession.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , ,
54 Comments

Anglicans! Come Home!

Keep repeating: Anglicanorum coetibus!

From CNA:

Anglo-Catholic bishops try to rally supporters but foresee conversions to Rome

London, England, Aug 3, 2010 / 12:20 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Fifteen Anglican bishops have acknowledged that many Anglicans will convert to Roman Catholicism because of current proposals to ordain women as bishops. Granting that the Anglo-Catholic tradition will not have room to grow under the proposals, they nonetheless urged “traditionalist” priests and deacons to continue their opposition.

The prelates responded to an open letter from over 1,000 Church of England priests and deacons who oppose new changes that would allow the ordination of women as bishops without concessions for those who reject the practice as inconsistent with the Christian tradition.

“These are grave times in the Church of England especially for those of us unable in good conscience to accept that any particular church has the authority to admit women to the episcopate,” the fifteen Anglican bishops’ July 27 letter began.

The bishops acknowledged that some Anglo-Catholics, including some bishops, are considering joining the Ordinariate established by Pope Benedict XVI for former Anglicans. Others will individually convert to Roman Catholicism.

Were the present proposals not to be substantially amended or defeated, many more of us will need to consider seriously these options,” the bishops wrote.

A number of Anglo-Catholics will remain in the Church of England because of personal circumstances, family loyalty or financial necessity, but they will do so with a well-founded “deep sense of unease,” the bishops said.

“Our concerns are not only about sacramental assurance though that is of profound importance. If the legislation now proposed passes, it will not provide room for our tradition to grow and flourish,” they warned.

The 15 bishops said a majority of the Church of England supports the ordination of women as bishops, and many in authority will not encourage the church’s “traditional integrity.” Noting that a recent compromise measure proposed by Archbishops Rowan Williams and John Sentamu only narrowly failed, the bishops argued that the “closeness of the vote” suggests “at least a measure of disquiet” in the majority about proceeding.

“Those who are not actively seeking a home elsewhere must work to defeat the currently proposed legislation,” the bishops urged.

“We are all bishops united in our belief that the Church of England is mistaken in its actions. However, we must be honest and say we are not united as to how we should respond to these developments,” they continued, pledging respect for other Anglo-Catholics’ decisions and advising against “unguarded or uncharitable criticism” of those who take different action.

The bishops’ letter noted that provincial meetings of the clergy in late September will have opportunities to discuss the future.

 

Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged
55 Comments

QUAERITUR: sign of the Cross when passing a non-Catholic church

From a reader:

I was taught to cross myself when passing by a Roman Catholic Church out of reverence for the Real Presence in the Eucharist that is present in that house of God. I live outside Washington D.C. and I see various Orthodox Churches, including a Ukrainian Orthodox, Indian Orthodox, Armenian (Iglesia Getsemani AIC), Russian Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox, Antiochian Orthodox, Greek Orthodox, et. al.

Given that the Vatican recognizes other churches as having the Eucharist, how do I know which churches, besides Roman Catholic ones, I should show reverence for when I pass by? Or should I keep it simple and only cross myself by Roman Catholic ones?

I think it is a good idea to make the Sign of the Cross, and you can accompany the pious gesture with any one of a number of short phrases which can gain partial indulgences.

 

If you know you are going in front of a Church where you are certain the Blessed Sacrament, valid Eucharist, is being reserved, I cannot see the harm in blessing yourself.

But it is up to you.  It isn’t a sin not to make the Sign of the Cross when going in front of a Church unless, perhaps, you are purposely ignoring the Lord whom you know to be present.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
50 Comments

The Feeder Feed: Who is this? Baeolophus bicolor!

I think I have a new visitor at the feeder.Twitter

I saw him once, yesterday.

Another view.

This is Tufted Titmouse!  Baeolophus bicolor.

He pecks at seeds like a chickadee or jay.

YIPPEE!

Didn’t get along with the Grosbeak.

Note the little tuft on the head.

Tufted Titmouse.

Mystery solved.

Posted in The Feeder Feed | Tagged
19 Comments

2 August: Portiuncula Indulgence

To Midnight 2 August,  you can gain the "Portinuncula" Indulgence.

Catholic Encyclopedia

St. Francis, as you know, repaired three chapels. The third was popularly called the Portiuncula or the Little Portion, dedicated to St. Mary of the Angels.  It is now enclosed in a sanctuary at Assisi.

The friars came to live at the Little Portion in early 1211.  It became the “motherhouse” of the Franciscans. This is where St. Clare came to the friars to make her vows during the night following Palm Sunday in 1212 and where Sister Death came to Francis on 3 October 1226.

Because of the favors from God obtained at the Portiuncula, St. Francis requested the Pope to grant remission of sins to all who came there.  The privilege extends beyond the Portiuncula to others churches, especially held by Franciscans, throughout the world.

A plenary indulgence is a mighty tool for works of mercy and weapon in our ongoing spiritual warfare.  A plenary indulgence is the remission, through the merits of Christ and the saints, through the Church, of all temporal punishment due to sin already forgiven.

To obtain the Portiuncula plenary indulgence, a person must visit the Chapel of Our Lady of the Angels at Assisi, or a Franciscan sanctuary, or one’s parish church, with the intention of honoring Our Lady of the Angels.  Then perform the work of reciting the Creed and Our Father and pray for the Pope’s designated intentions.  You should be free, at least intentionally, of attachment to venial and mortal sin, and truly repentant. Make your sacramental confession 8 days before or after.  Participate at assist at Mass and receive Holy Communion 8 days before or after. 

BTW… the faithful can gain a plenary indulgence on a day of the year he designates (cf. Ench. Indul. 33 1.2.d).  You might choose the anniversary of your baptism or of another sacrament or name day.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Just Too Cool, New Evangelization, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged
11 Comments

Sunday Supper 5 – What happened!

I said that for this Sunday’s supper I would make a broccoli dish from Apicius’ 2nd century and indeed I did.   I would do it differently next time (since the recipe was pretty sketchy).   for some hints about how to use all the broccoli that is coming in.work De re coquinaria

The recipe was from De re coquinaria, Apicius’ 2nd century cookbook in a modernized edition by John Edwards called The Roman Cookery of Apicius, I could make coliculi elixati, “Broccoli and Cabbage in Coriander Wine Sauce”.  I had everything in the garden, with the exception of the cumin.

There wasn’t much to the recipe except to put cooked broccoli in the concoction they designated, “boiled wine” and some herbs and onion.   Just about the prevalent ingredient in ancient Roman fare was pepper, and of course garum.  I didn’t use garum, but I did use pepper.  I think I could have used more.  The basic idea is to seethe your broccoli in this cooking fluid, which has onion, coriander, cumin and pepper.  The fluid itself was a sweet wine I reduced to less than half.  I should have reduced it more and increased the spices.

The main course was a chicken recipe from Julia Child’s Mastering the Art of French Cooking, Poulet Sauté aux Herbes de Provence Chicken sauteed with Herbs and Garlic, Egg Yolk and Butter Sauce.  The recipe calls for thyme or savory, I and used both.

The recipe as described in the book:

Basil, thyme or savory, a pinch of fennel, and a bit of garlic give this sauté a fine Provencal flavor that is even more pronounced if your herbs are fresh.  The sauce is a type of hollandaise, as the herbal, buttery pan juices are beaten into the egg yolks to make Julia Childa thick and creamy liaison.  Serve this dish with potatoes sauteed in butter or potato crepes, broiled tomatoes and a chilled rosé wine.

The total time I used was about an hour of really intense work, which included setting the table in the gaps.

I would not have been any fun to talk with during that first half hour, for sure.  Then things settled in and didn’t get bad until the last 5 minutes.

I brought in lots of coriander (= ciilantro) which had gone to seed.  I wanted the seeds.  Next time I will also use leave of fresh cilantro.

Now to shake of the seeds and store them against the next time.

Grinding some coriander.

Reducing the wine.

The seething mixture, includes olive oil.

The beginning of the preparation of the chicken is not so interesting in itself.

Brown the chicken in butter, take out the white meat at a certain point and season the dark and keep cooking with the herbs.

Then add the white back in and finish cooking.

Then the fun starts.

One of the things you added when the white meat came out the first time were three cloves of unpeeled garlic.

Now that all the chicken is cooked and out of the pan, you mash the garlic and take out the skins.

Deglaze with white wine or vermouth.  I used vermouth.  Reduce.

If you have other things going, you need to pay attention, because it was at this point that I forgot to keep my eye on the hashbrowns I decided to make.

You make a sauce from the pan juices along the lines of a Hollandaise.

This means use set up a double-boiler and start beating the juices into egg yolks.

Cook it as you go to thicken it.

I strained the juices a bit before I started, but I wouldn’t have had to.

Add more herbs.

Put it on the platter and haul it outside!  Dark hashbrowns on the left, of course.

Plated with ancient Roman broccoli.

The broccoli…. I don’t know what to say.  The recipe was perfectly sketchy.

I need to try this again, to get into the theory of it.  It just didn’t seem right to me.

Don’t get me wrong.  It was good.

First, the broccoli discolored, which in itself doesn’t bother me too much, but I think that having a more intense and reduced fluid and slower cook time will help.

Also, I will steam the broccoli above the mixture before I put it in to blend the flavors.

And it must be more intense.  I need to reduce far more than the recipe suggested.  We have to consider what ancient Roman wine was like.  This needed a thicker and more rasiny impact.  And I will use also more of the spices.  Also, I will probably also add sliced cabbage.

I think I know what this recipe is about, but today… it wasn’t quite there.  Good, but not yet right.

The chicken was tender and the sauce intense with a perfect balance of the herbs.  The hashbrowns were a good choice, and they were not burned, though they came close while I was doing the sauce.  Gotta remember that and set up the time line so they are done and the sauce is the last thing I have to prepare.

For dessert we had crisp apples and a soft cheese and some little cookies with very strong coffee.

Here is a shot of the wine we had with the meal.

Thus, Sunday supper.

PENJING REPORT

Penjing and the bonsais were banished to the kiddie table.

Penjing, protesting the marginalization, is putting on a show with little white flowers.

Once again, make plans for Sunday meals with others.

Families who eat together tend to have stronger bonds.

Invitations to meals, especially to those who are alone, can be a great source of consolation, a real work of mercy.

From John Paul II’s Dies Domini:

72. The Eucharist is an event and programme of true brotherhood. From the Sunday Mass there flows a tide of charity destined to spread into the whole life of the faithful, beginning by inspiring the very way in which they live the rest of Sunday. If Sunday is a day of joy, Christians should declare by their actual behaviour that we cannot be happy “on our own”. They look around to find people who may need their help. It may be that in their neighborhood or among those they know there are sick people, elderly people, children or immigrants who precisely on Sundays feel more keenly their isolation, needs and suffering. It is true that commitment to these people cannot be restricted to occasional Sunday gestures. But presuming a wider sense of commitment, why not make the Lord’s Day a more intense time of sharing, encouraging all the inventiveness of which Christian charity is capable? Inviting to a meal people who are alone, visiting the sick, providing food for needy families, spending a few hours in voluntary work and acts of solidarity: these would certainly be ways of bringing into people’s lives the love of Christ received at the Eucharistic table.

And don’t forget to pray before and after meals.

BEFORE: Benedic, Domine, nos et haec tua dona quae de tua largitate sumus sumpturi. Per Christum Dominum nostrum. Amen.

AFTER: Agimus tibi gratias, omnipotens Deus, pro universis beneficiis tuis, qui vivis et regnas in saecula saeculorum. Amen.

and… Fidelium animae per misericordiam Dei requiescant in pace. R. Amen.

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen | Tagged , , , , ,
21 Comments