I have had a couple notes today from readers who report that the blog is hanging or crashing.
Anyone having problems? Lemme know what’s going on.
I have had a couple notes today from readers who report that the blog is hanging or crashing.
Anyone having problems? Lemme know what’s going on.
From Space Weather:
FIRST METEOR SHOWER OF 2012: The annual Quadrantid meteor shower peaks on Wednesday morning, Jan. 4th, when Earth passes through a narrow stream of debris from a comet thought to have broken apart some 500 years ago. The shower is expected to be strong (as many as 100 meteors per hour), but elusive, with a peak that lasts no longer than a couple of hours. The shower’s radiant near Polaris favors observers in the northern hemisphere. Images, live audio from a meteor radar, and more information are available on today’s edition of http://spaceweather.com.
Polaris is, of course, the “North Star”. Pretty easy to find if the sky is clear!
Sometime I get feedback from a reader saying that something I wrote prompted him to return to the sacrament of penance or moved her to get her marriage straightened out. Those notes help me keep this blog going.
This is from a priest, about something I posted here:
Thank you for the post on the invalid matter (wheatless hosts).
Ziegler’s has a store in ___. I e-mailed it to several priests in the diocese and at least one had purchased it and was going to use it (the box is now thrown away). Also, I love reading you blog. Again Thank You!
That’s great! And you are welcome. Good work, Father!
Everyone, keep in mind that Ziegler’s is a store. They do not make the wheatless hosts themselves. They just sell them. I am sure they have many perfectly sound hosts useful for Mass.
Therefore, as always, the priest and the person doing the purchasing for a parish or chapel, needs to exercise careful oversight about the matter used for the Eucharist.
For your Just Too Cool file.
A reader sent me a link to an article about the integration of fetal cells into the mother’s body and vice versa. The content of the article is excerpted from a book called Do Chocolate Lovers Have Sweeter Babies?: The Surprising Science of Pregnancy by Jena Pinctott, who also did the aforementioned excerpting.
Here is a portion with my emphases and comments.. I love the title of the article, which is a riff on an old scripture of the feminist movement’s canon:
Our Selves, Other Cells
By Jena Pincott at 6:00 am Tuesday, Jan 3Living With Someone Else’s Cells
Is it any solace to sentimental mothers that their babies will always be part of them?
[…]
Of course, we nosy mothers would like to know exactly what our children’s cells are up to while they hang out in us. Are they just biding time in our bodies? Are they mother’s little helpers? Or are they baby rebels, planning an insurgency? [Is that the argument of some of the pro-abortion advocates? That the baby is an an “invader” whom a woman has a right to fight off?]
It turns out that when fetal cells are good, they are very, very good. They may protect mothers from some forms of cancer. Fetal cells show up significantly more often in the breast tissue of women who don’t have breast cancer than in women who do (43 versus 14 percent). Why is this? Fetal cells are foreign to the mother because they contain DNA from the baby’s father. One theory is that this “otherness” stimulates the mother’s immune system just enough to help keep malignant cells in check. The more fetal cells there are in a woman’s body, the less active are autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis. These conditions improve during pregnancy and for some time afterward — suggesting that the mother’s immune system is more focused on attacking the “other,” not herself. There’s also tantalizing evidence that fetal cells may offer the mother increased resistance to certain diseases, thanks to the presence of the father’s immune system genes. These are new weapons in the war chest.
Some fetal cells have the potential to grow up and be anything. While many of the cells that enter the mother are immune system cells, some are stem cells. [Sounds like the only legitimate form of embryonic stem cell therapy. I wouldn’t push that analogy, however, since therapy implies an illness. Pregnancy is NOT an illness, which is an argument of the pro-abortion people.] Stem cells have magical properties: they can morph into other types of cells (a process called differentiation), like liver, heart, or brain cells, and become part of those organs. Fetal stem cells migrate to injury sites—for instance, they’ve been found in diseased thyroid and liver tissue and have turned themselves into thyroid and liver cells respectively. At the triage sites of wounds they accelerate healing, reducing scars after pregnancy and restoring the normal structure of the skin. It’s striking, the evidence that a fetus’s cells repair and rejuvenate moms. Of course, evolutionarily speaking, the baby has its own interests in mind. It needs a healthy mom.
Then there’s baby on the brain. This is the truly startling stuff. Researchers working with mice have found evidence that cells from the fetus can cross a mother’s brain-blood barrier and generate new neurons. If this happens in humans—and there’s reason to believe it does—then it means, in a very real sense, that our babies integrate themselves into the circuitry of our minds. Could this help explain the remarkable finding that new mothers grow new gray matter in their prefrontal cortex (goals and social control), hypothalamus (hormonal regulation), and other areas of the brain?
[…]
You can read the rest there.
Very cool stuff.
Today in Houston there was a presser with Card. DiNardo of Houston-Galveston and Msgr. Steenson the Ordinary of the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of Peter.
Both men has good Patristic credentials.
Card. DiNardo is an alumus of my school, the Patristic Institute “Augustinianum”.
Msgr. Steenson did his DPhil in Oxford in Patristics.

From a reader:
Dear Fr. Z., I am aware that the GIRM for OF Masses requires all passing in front of a tabernacle to BOW instead of genuflect, and for everyone to comport to the action of the priest during procession and recession. However, the faithful are supposed to genuflect at all other times. I notice that out of any ten able-bodied parishioners, I see maybe two or three genuflexions to 7 or 8 bows, and only two or three of those are executed in what one might construe as a reverent sense.
How long until the USCCB authorizes them to wave or flash a gang sign?
Our pastor and priests set a good example (one bows, but bows very deeply), but the implications of lex orandi lex credendi here are disturbing — what can a layman do?
Set a good example.
Continue to genuflect.
BENEDICT XVI’S PRAYER INTENTIONS FOR JANUARY 2012
VATICAN CITY, 30 DEC 2011 (VIS) – Pope Benedict’s general prayer intention for January 2012 is: “That the victims of natural disasters may receive the spiritual and material comfort they need to rebuild their lives”.
His mission intention is: “That the dedication of Christians to peace may bear witness to the name of Christ before all men and women of good will”.
I watched a segment on Hannity’s show tonight (between plays) and candidate Rick Santorum was on. He explained the death of his newborn child, which became a point of – I am not making this up – mockery from liberal pundit Alan Colmes.
Karen & Rick Santorum had a baby who lived for only a couple hours. Karen, who had been a neo-natal intensive care nurse, and Rick kept the baby with them and brought their deceased child home so that their other children could know they had another sibling and so that they could all say goodbye. Then they had a proper and dignified burial. In other words, they treated their dead child with dignity as a human being and member of a family.
This is what Colmes said in a segment on Fox News in a box across from Rich Lowry.
[The embedded video was causing some problems for the page. Click HERE.]
Later, Alan Colmes called Santorum and apologized.
Apology accepted by Santorum.
Nevertheless, Colmes remarks reveal the attitude of his sort of liberal about pregnancy, birth, babies, children, (natural) sexuality, family over and opposed to the beliefs, thoughts, even feelings of those who defend the dignity of human life.
Meanwhile, I picked this up from my friend Fr. John Boyle’s blog, Caritas in Veritate. Aside from the fact that Rick Santorum is a candidate, he has great comments about marriage in this video clip. I wasn’t going to post this until after the Iowa Caucuses but, in light of the other news today about Santorum’s family, this video clip reveals something about what men ought to think about families.
It is helpful to see these videos back to back.
Have a look. You can see why a liberal such as Alan Colmes would ridicule Rick Santorum and try to label him as an extremist.
[The embedded video was causing some problems for the page. Click HERE.]
Do you have good news to share with the readers?
Any resolutions?
Was there a good point from the Sunday/Holy Day sermon you heard?