QUAERITUR: Missing Masses with the “corny music”

From a reader:

I am having difficulties reconciling my love of the EF Mass with the
fact that sometimes I miss the OF Mass and it’s corny music. You know, sometimes I miss being able to expressively belt out Table of Plenty or something classic like Peace is Flowing Like a River or something hip smacking like Lord of Glory. I don’t know what to do, and I can’t help but feel like I’m sinning because it’s the sheer comedic enjoyment I get out of such Masses rather than the most holy sacrifice.

What should I do?

First, make sure you fulfill your Mass obligation on days of precept and receive Holy Communion in the state of grace in either form of Holy Mass

I have here sometimes used the provocative image of the TLM being the grown-up Mass (T-Bone steak and Cabernet) and the Novus Ordo, at least as celebrated in many places, as the kiddy Mass (jar of pureed carrot and milk). Condescending? I suppose. I can live with that. While milk and pureed carrots are the proper food for the very young, sometimes adults eat it too, as for example when she has a broken jaw. Each form of food has its time and purpose.

So, if you want to attend Holy Mass with the out of tune guitars and tambourines and poorly written, self-referential music, I say go for it!





Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , , , , ,
55 Comments

QUAERITUR: Priests and a silent Roman Canon

In another post I wrote about an option for a silent Canon/Eucharistic Prayer in the Ordinary Form.

This comes from a priest:

I have had an interesting experience with the new translation of the Roman Missal. Since it arrived, I decided that I will use the Roman Canon solely. However, because of it’s beauty, I am being drawn into it unlike the older translation. That may be because it is so new and I’m being a bit more intent on it. And, it is difficult not to add all of the signs of the cross that I have become accustomed to in the Extraordinary Form. On about three occasions I have begun to to recite the Roman Canon in silence as I would in the EF and then realize what I was doing and start again. I wonder if any other priests have had this experience?

Good question.

I sure do resonate with the tendency to insert many of the TLM gestures into the Novus Ordo (genuflections, signs of the Cross).  We become creatures of habit.  I really have to concentrate.  The same applies with the new translation, doesn’t it?

For many years I said Mass daily at St. Peter’s Basilica, often privately or with only one or a few people. To the consternation of the censorious sacristans I said the TLM most of the time, but I would also use the Novus Ordo entirely in Latin. I would say the Roman Canon silently, not only because it is best not to disturb other priests saying Mass, but because it seems the most natural thing in the world to do so.

Fathers?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Brick by Brick, Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
28 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can EMCHs give “blessings”?

From a reader:

At Mass this morning, at least one of the EMs was ‘blessing’ children
as they came forward. My understanding was that only priests could
give blessings.

We are a parish with 2 priests covering 3 churches, plus one Permanent Deacon.

The priest in charge was officiating today, alone. He also happens to
be the Vicar General.

I’m only in RCIA so I don’t feel I can comment but it just didn’t seem
quite right. Can you advise?

Since you are in RCIA, you are no doubt curious and interested to learn about Catholic worship and practices. I wish all Catholics were interested for their whole lives in learning about our worship.

I will refer you to a good entry about this issue HERE. It includes an article by Mr. Paul M. Matenaer, who wrote it for the newspaper of the Diocese of Madison.  My emphases and comments.

Excerpt:

In 2008, the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments received a letter asking precisely this question. The congregation responded in a private reply with five observations on why this practice is not permitted. [NOT]

But first, let me note that even though private replies do not have the force of universal law, they typically (and this one especially) contain an excellent analysis and resolution of the issue, giving us a unique look at the practice of the Roman Curia. In other words, this private reply is persuasive not by reason of authority but by the authority of right reason, to which every well-intentioned Catholic should submit. Here are their five observations:

Blessing given at end of Mass

[1] The Congregation for Divine Worship points out in their first observation that the liturgical blessing of the Mass is given to everyone gathered in the church just a few moments after the distribution of Holy Communion. This occurs when the priest, making the sign of the cross, says, “May Almighty God bless you, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit.”

In other words, there is no need to bless only some members of the congregation (e.g. children and non-Catholics) during communion, when the entire congregation is blessed by the priest just moments later.
Laity unable to bless at Mass

[2] In the second observation, we are reminded that within the context of Mass, blessings are the competency of the priest, not lay persons. Article 18 of the Book of Blessings [ugh] notes that even though lay persons may give some blessings, “whenever a priest or deacon is present, the office of presiding [over a blessing] should be left to him.”  [And at Mass there is always a sacerdos present.]

A 1997 instruction, Ecclesia de Mysterio, on the collaboration of the lay faithful further indicates that the laity should never say prayers or perform actions during the Mass which are proper to the priest, as this may lead to a confusion of roles. Since the blessing of the congregation during Mass is reserved to the priest, lay persons must avoid doing so.

Laying on of hands discouraged

[3] The third observation addresses the practice in some places where the EMHC lays hands on a member of the congregation as a sign of blessing. The private reply states that this practice “is to be explicitly discouraged” because the laying on of hands has its own “sacramental significance” which is inappropriate here. The Catechism notes that since this specific sign commonly accompanies the administration of sacraments (e.g. Confirmation) and the succession of the apostles, the laying on of hands must not be used here.

Some prohibited from receiving blessings

[4] Finally, in the fourth and fifth observations, the private reply notes there are some who should neither approach Holy Communion nor receive a blessing. This would include non-Catholics and those mentioned in canon 915 of the Code of Canon Law, such as those under the penalty of excommunication and those persisting in manifest grave sin. [!] Giving a blessing to these persons might give the impression that they are in full communion with the Church or have returned to good standing. In order to avoid the possibility of scandal, EMHCs should not give blessings.

Additions to the rite prohibited

[5] Finally, even though the private reply does not specifically mention this, we ought to recall that “no one may on a personal initiative add to or omit or alter anything in [liturgical] books” as canon 846 of the Code of Canon Law clearly states. Nowhere in the Roman Missal or the GIRM are the extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion instructed to bless those unable to receive communion; therefore, this practice of blessing is one of these additions to the rite which is strictly prohibited.

Making use of the sacramentals

Sometimes we may be tempted to think that since something is not part of the Mass it has no spiritual importance. But this would be to neglect the power of the sacramentals, such as blessings, which are liturgical actions signifying spiritual effects obtained through the intercession of the Church. Done properly and in the right context, these blessings better dispose us to receive grace and sanctify various occasions in life.

[NB] One such sacramental that lay persons may administer is the blessing of sons/daughters, which can be as simple as praying over your children: “May the Lord keep you and make you grow in his love, so that you may live worthy of the calling he has given you, now and for ever. Amen.”

Therefore, even if EMHCs are not permitted to give blessings during Mass, the desire to bless is good nonetheless and can become a fruitful aspect of our faith when done in accordance with the Church’s rites. As a parent, I have always enjoyed the practice of blessing my young children before bed and teaching them to reverence the Eucharist with a simple bow of the head as they walk past the minister of Holy Communion at Mass.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
50 Comments

A golden subject: Reclaiming silence in our churches. A Scotish bishop’s good insights.

The Bishop of Aberdeen, Scotland, has issued in interesting pastoral letter about the need to reclaim, indeed, “create” silence and, through silence, prayer.  The bishop, Most Rev. Hugh Gilbert, OSB, was once a monk and abbot of Pluscarden Abbey. He really gets silence.

He does not shy from the “third rail”: babies.

He makes a few great points along the way. Here are a few:

… There can be no real relationship with God, there can be no real meeting with God, without silence. Silence prepares for that meeting and silence follows it. … ‘Two people talking stop forty people praying.’ … ‘If deep silence has a hold on what is inside us, then into us too the all-powerful Word will slip quietly from the Father’s throne.’ …

Here, however, is a point that could use more thought:

Now often there is talking up to the very beginning of Mass, and it starts again immediately afterwards.

“Hmmm”, thought I (silently, of course) as I read this.

Not only does the noise/talking precede Mass and follow Mass but in many cases noise/talking continues through the whole of the Mass as well. Certainly talking does, in the Novus Ordo. It’s talk talk talk talk talk talk talk straight through. No?

I think the Bishop is right about this undoubtedly golden subject.

I suggest that, to help recover and create silence, we have far more celebrations of the Extraordinary Form.

I suggest that we diligently petition Rome to provide an Ordinary Form option for a silent Canon.

Even if the option might be for just a silent Roman Canon/1st Eucharistic Prayer, that would be helpful.  We have options here, there, and everywhere for so many things in the Ordinary Form.  Why not that also?

The rest is – as you know – silence.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
41 Comments

Aw…shucks!

One from a bushel of oysters!  This was a nice surprise.

The right tool makes all the difference.

Yum.

20111211-201113.jpg

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Fr. Z's Kitchen | Tagged
13 Comments

Recent Posts of Interest, Voice Mails, Pingbacks, and THANKS!

First, many thanks to those of you who have been buying Mystic Monk Coffee and tea and other swag and mugs, etc., from my shops, and using the Amazon links and search boxes here.  I haven’t been at home for a while, so I don’t know what items from my wishlists might be awaiting my return, but thanks to you as well.  Sometimes things come with no notifications about who sent x,y, or z.  I did get a notification by email about the gift from the Kindle book wishlist came in the other day, but there is never an email link back to the giver.  Furthermore, some of you have used my donation button (I’ll put the “coffee cup” at the bottom of this post). This month is a little behind the trend, but thanks especially to:

JdR, PMF, CS, RB, MFJ, BB, HM, JR, MR, LS, EMcG, AR, MQ, DG, BB, WH, PP, MH, APLE, PS, DFP, VdG!

I should be able to say Mass for the intentions of all you benefactors next Thursday.  It is my privilege and duty to pray for benefactors, which is what I consider you to be.

Moreover, I have had a few nice voice-mails from readers.  I enjoy listening to them.  Thanks!  One person shared his thought that perhaps someone at iTunes was purposely blocking my PODCAzT feed, since many of the audio projects I make don’t show up there.  For my part, I think it is my own incompetence and lack of skill in getting all the settings right that causes the problems.

Also, I will be approving more “pingbacks” that wind up in my moderation queue. I have not been letting any through, but, when they come from fellow bloggers, I think I will approve them to help some of you add to your traffic a bit. We all have to help each other out in this “digital continent” of ours!  So, if you link to me and I get a pingback, I try to let your pingbacks through to the combox.

Here are some links to posts that are scrolling along:

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on Recent Posts of Interest, Voice Mails, Pingbacks, and THANKS!

QUAERITUR: Can a bishop forbid Mass in Latin?

From a reader:

You recently had a post about Latin and the Novus Ordo with a
reference to canon 928. You asserted that Mass can always be
celebrated in Latin based on that canon. If one’s bishop makes it a
policy
that priests who want to have a Mass (with a Congregation) in Latin must obtain permission from him, is this a legitimate exercise of his authority?

I took this to a trusted canonist and received back this response which I have edited slightly and to which I have added some emphases and notes of my own:

Before we address the matter, we need to know precisely what the situation is. A bishop has made this “a policy.” How did he do so? Did he simply state to the priests that this is his preference? Did he issue some sort of a decree? How did he make this “policy” known?

I don’t see how a bishop could legitimately could require that priests get his permission to celebrate the liturgy publicly in the normative language of the Rite. [Exactly.] If it were merely stated as a “policy,” any priest should feel completely free to disregard it, as “policies” have no real force in law. If it was issued as a decree, then the priest could – and should [!] – seek administrative recourse, first asking the bishop to reverse the decree, and then pursuing the matter before the Congregation for Divine Worship. I am certain he would obtain a favorable hearing.  [Haudquaquam dubitandum’st!]

We also need to know precisely what the policy states. The bishop is, legitimately, the moderator of the liturgy in his diocese. He has an obligation to see to the legitimate needs of the faithful under his care.

[Let the fun begin!] The allowance of the vernacular in the liturgy has given rise to the legitimate aspirations of the faithful to have the liturgy celebrated – at least in part, and at least some of the time – in the vernacular.

If, say, there is a town with three parishes, and all three parishes offer Holy Mass each weekend only in Latin – two in the Ordinary form and one in the Extraordinary Form – and there is a coetus of people who wish to have Mass celebrated in the vernacular, [LOL!] it would be reasonable for the bishop to step in and require that one of the parishes have one Mass on the weekend in the vernacular. Perhaps at 3:00 p.m. in the afternoon, in a side chapel, after the heat in the church has been turned off, and while the janitor is cleaning the rest of the church with a loud buffer. (a bit too snarky?)  [Noooooooo…..]

On the whole, however, I wish that bishops spent as much time and energy eliminating real liturgical abuse as they seem to spend on making some legitimate options mandatory and others verboten.

How strenuously does this bishop enforce a “policy” against the abuse of General Absolution, or stoles being worn over chasubles, or the use of extraordinary ministers when none are warranted?

Superb.

What many people don’t realize is that the Second Vatican Council mandate that Latin be retained in the Latin Church’s liturgical worship (SC 36.1).  It said that the vernacular could be used at times for some parts of the Mass (SC 36.2).

In other words, the esteemed canonist, in his Rod Serling-esque response (above) hit the right tone.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, HONORED GUESTS, Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , , ,
29 Comments

Phoenix: Mercy Sister excomm’d for abortion decision at Catholic hospital no longer excomm’d?

Did anyone notice this little story in the “briefs” at CNS?

Mercy nun at hospital that allowed abortion ‘no longer excommunicated

PHOENIX (CNS) — A Mercy sister who was automatically excommunicated because of her role on the ethics committee that allowed an abortion to be performed at a Catholic hospital in Phoenix in 2009 is back in good standing in the Catholic Church. In May 2010, officials at St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center publicly acknowledged that an abortion had occurred at the hospital in late 2009. Officials said the woman was 11 weeks pregnant and suffered from pulmonary hypertension, a condition that the hospital said carried a near-certain risk of death for the mother if the pregnancy continued. It also was revealed at the time that Mercy Sister Margaret McBride had incurred automatic excommunication because of her role on the ethics committee that sanctioned the abortion. On Dec. 21, 2010, Phoenix Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted announced that the hospital could no longer identify itself as a Catholic hospital. [NB:] In a Dec. 8 statement, the hospital said Sister Margaret has since “met the requirements for reinstatement with the church and she is no longer excommunicated. She continues to be a member in good standing with the Sisters of Mercy and is a valued member of the St. Joseph’s executive team.” [Has there also been a statement from the Diocese of Phoenix?] The statement, emailed to Catholic News Service in response to a query about her status, provided no more details and the hospital had no further comment. [I hate to bring this up, but there is an old adage: “Gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.“] Sister Margaret is currently the medical center’s vice president for organizational outreach. Last year when Bishop Olmsted issued his decree revoking the 116-year-old hospital’s affiliation with the Catholic Church, he wrote that he could not verify that the hospital provided health care consistent with “authentic Catholic moral teaching.” “It became clear that, in their decision to abort, the equal dignity of mother and her baby were not both upheld,” he said. The baby “was directly killed,” which is a violation of the church’s ethical and religious directives.

I am always happy when erstwhile errant person returns to Communion in the One True Holy Catholic Church.  But this is a little fuzzy.  If there was a public statement made confirming that the excommunication was incurred, shouldn’t there be a public statement confirming that the censure was lifted?

UPDATE 1648 GMT:

Think about this.  In November she was given an award by Call To Action for what she did.

There is a video in which she effectively mocks the Church concerning the censure.  Is that the attitude of someone who is going to be reconciled?

Am I missing something?

UPDATE 1915 GMT:

Okay, I am ready to believe that Sr. McBride has been reconciled.  GREAT!  I am happy for that, as all Catholics ought to be.

What I am wondering about is this: If there was a public statement from the diocese giving a confirmation of the excommunication, in justice shouldn’t there be a public statement from the diocese stating that it was lifted?

UPDATE 2005 GMT:

Don’t forget Dr. Peters’ excellent and affordable book on excommunications. HERE.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Linking Back | Tagged , , , , , ,
18 Comments

A reading tip – Catholic Priests Falsely Accused: The Facts, The Fraud, The Stories

Not exactly light reading, but this is an important topic… and not just for priests and bishops!  Everyone should be concerned about this.

Check out David F. Pierre Jr.’s book Catholic Priests Falsely Accused: The Facts, The Fraud, The Stories.

It is available for US readers HERE (Kindle version HERE) and UK readers HERE (Kindle version HERE).

Need a Kindle?  US HERE and UK HERE.

This is the Kindle I have.  Love it!  (UK HERE)

Kindle

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Clerical Sexual Abuse, Our Catholic Identity, REVIEWS, SESSIUNCULA, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

John Patrick Card. Foley, RIP

In your charity, please remember to pray for the repose of the soul of His Eminence John Patrick Card. Foley, who died on 11 December at the age of 76.

Eternal rest grant unto him, O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon him.
May he rest in peace.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
8 Comments