If you install it, they will kneel.

Is kneeling the new standing?

From a deacon:

We just finished a refurbishing of the inside of our church shortly
before Christmas which included bringing out of the basement the old
altar rail and re-installing it
. For midnite mass our pastor
announced before mass that “the norm in our diocese for reception of
communion is a solemn bow just before recieving standing either on the
tongue or in the hand . In order to accomodate those who wish to
recieve our Lord while kneeling we will from now on recieve communion
at the rail . You can either stand or kneel and recieve either on the
tongue or in the hand but all will be done at the rail “. Happy to say
that over 75% OF THE CONGREGATION KNELT ! Of those who knelt to
recieve the majority were on the tongue . Several had tears in their
eyes as they recieved our Lord.What a great start .

Will old traditions be forgot?

In with the old and out with the new?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
30 Comments

Brick by brick! A reader describes how the Sacrament of Penance is being revived.

It is of critical importance that we rebuild, revive the use of the Sacrament of Penance. One way to start would be to hear confessions for a few minutes before Masses.

From a reader:

I’ve noticed over the last few weeks that there has been a great increase in the amount of discussion about confession and I thought you might like to hear this story.

A few years ago I used to have to beg and beg to get the local priest to hear my confession. I won’t go into details as I’m sure you don’t want to just read a list of complaints but it was tough.

Anyway, suffice to say I had trouble getting the old priest to hear my confession. Then a couple of years ago the priest was moved (I had nothing to do with it, I think they all just move around every so often). We got a new pastor who also gave me lots of excuses why he couldn’t hear my confession. Luckily there was another priest from another country assigned to help him. He was happy the hear my confessions any time I would ask. I could just show up at some random time and if he was there he would hear my confession. He said that that pastor wouldn’t allow him to set certain hours for confession and publish them for the parish but that he would keep an open door policy for anyone. It turned out that I would usually ask him about an hour before Mass and there has never been a problem.

Then something happened. I guess the word got out to everyone else because now it’s not just me. I come to the Church an hour before Mass as usual but now there is usually a line. He’s usually in the confessional right up to about five minutes to the start of Mass. So on the one hand I feel very happy that everyone now has a chance to go to confession but I also feel a bit responsible for causing more work for the priest who was so generous of his time to hear my confessions in the first place.

Brick by brick.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
25 Comments

QUAERITUR: Why so many variations in Mass depending on the priest?

QUAERITUR: Why so many variations in Mass depending on the priest?

From a reader:

I am a new convert to the Faith within the last nine months, and I am
still in the process of joining the Church formally. As such I’m still
learning a good deal about the Church, her liturgy, etc. One thing
that I’ve noticed that’s struck me as odd is the sheer number of
variations there are within the ordinary form. I’ve seen Priests vary
how they hold the Hosts during consecration, I’ve seen some not even
raise the Host. Then after the canon of the Mass I’ve seen some
variance regarding whether the Priest raises the Host over the Chalice
in front of the people, or whether they just raise them both in
opposite hands, and on and on. Are any of these type of variations
liturgical abuses, or is there *that* much room for variation in the
OF?

Congratulations on your journey into union with the Church Christ Himself established.

In a nutshell, some decades ago in the books for the older form of Holy Mass, what we call the Extraordinary Form, there were clear indications that some “defects” in how the priest celebrated Mass were sins. The Missal said, in black and white, that if a priest did certain things wrong he committed a sin. Furthermore, since the issue of rubrics (the red writing in the Missal providing “stage directions” for Mass) was a matter of moral theology, when seminarians and priests studied moral theology and also how to say Mass, they learned specific ways to do things. There would still be a little variation from priest to priest, but in general every priest in the world said Mass more or less the same way.

Sadly, some seminarians and priests who came out of particularly rigid programs of formation because, if they were on the scrupulous side, fixated on certain details of celebration to such an extent that their concerns for perfection were rather unhealthy. This rigidity in some, tarred the whole clear, precise method and approach to following the rubrics with the same brush. When the chance came with the post-Conciliar reform of the liturgy, the complex web of clear and understandable rules was swept aside. There was no longer any mention of sin in the forward for the newer Missal (Ordinary Form) if someone went off and did his own thing or made up his own words. There was also a terrible antinomian spirit that flooded into the Church through that crack Paul VI famously mentioned as the ingress of the smoke of Satan. There was a wave of wild-experimentation that was utterly at odds with the way Catholics had done things for centuries.

We are still living in trailing edge of the riptide of those times, especially when it comes to priests who went through those wild days in the 60s and priests who were trained by the iconoclasts through about the 80s.

Another problem is that the book for the Ordinary Form describes how to do certain things in rather vague terms. Therefore, variations crop up.  Some legitimate.  Some not.

Happily younger priests are more and more inclined to follow the book exactly, to say the black words on the page and do what the red words indicate. They are happy to take their cue from the older, Extraordinary Form to recuperate a Roman style of celebration consistent with our Latin Church identity.

In short, we are growing out of the silly season.

But we are a long way from consistency from priest to priest (especially those of a certain age) when it comes to the Ordinary Form. It’ll take quite a while for that to happen.

This is one of the reason why we need more and more and more celebrations of Holy Mass with the Extraordinary Form. This is one of the reasons Pope Benedict issued his provision in his document Summorum Pontificum, the “emancipation proclamation” for the older form of Mass.  He thinks that a kind of gravitational pull will be exerted by side-by-side use of both Forms of the Roman Rite.  The growing use of the older, Extraordinary Form will do a great deal to clean up liturgical sloppiness in the Ordinary Form.

In the meantime, don’t let the small variations bother you too much, unless they are simply weird.  And you should also attend the Extraordinary Form if it is available in your area.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , , ,
36 Comments

PLENARY INDULGENCE for Te Deum at end of the year

We read in the Enchiridion Indulgentiarum 26 that, under the usual conditions, people can gain a plenary indulgence by participating in a liturgical praying of the Te Deum for the end of the year.

Is there one in your diocese or parish?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
23 Comments

QUAERITUR: Why does the pope say a couple living together is “not excluded from the love of the Church or from the love of Christ”?

From a reader:

Why does the pope say a couple living together ‘married’ without an
annulment of a previous marriage is “not excluded from the love of
the Church or from the love of Christ”? Christ said they were
committing adultery. Mortal sin excludes one from the sacraments
because without repentance the soul is dead to the love of God.

Think about what you asked.

Even though we sin, God loves us and desires us to return to the state of grace. God gives us graces also when we are separated from Him in mortal sin so that we may the easier return to His friendship.

Such a couple may be excluded from receiving the sacraments until they get things straightened out. That doesn’t mean they can’t be members of the Church or that God has stopped loving them.

Holy Church continues to hold the door open for sinners, for the Church never desires the permanent exclusion of any person from a fuller participation in the Church’s journey towards God in heaven. Holy Church asks, however, that they be honest and not receive the sacraments if they are impeded for some reason (read = mortal sin, risk of public scandal, etc.).

When YOU commit a mortal sin, do you think God stops loving you? Do you think the Church slams the door of reconciliation in your face?

I think you need to review a bit.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity |
31 Comments

Whatever happend to transparency?

Over at the National catholic Fishwrap there is an interesting story about SNAP resisting a deposition.

Whatever happened to the transparency SNAP always demands from everyone else?

Hasn’t SNAP perpetually demanded that every diocese hand over every scrap of paper that has ever crossed a diocesan desk? Am I mistaken about that?

NCR seems to be taking SNAP’s side. What a surprise!

I noticed this line in NCR’s article: “NCR is one of the organizations that may be impacted by the submission of documents, as reporters have been in contact with Clohessy as a source for decades.”

We shall have to watch how this all works out.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage |
Comments Off on Whatever happend to transparency?

Your checked luggage: where does it go?

Biretta tip to Patrick Madrid, who also flies a lot.  Delta (with which I am … never mind…) has a new app for the iPhone that tracks your checked luggage.  I have used it, as a matter of fact, recently.  I had a flight delay that caused me to miss a connection.  The app tracked my bag, as advertised!

To advertise their app Delta has a video of where your bag goes, from the time it disappears behind the rubber flaps until you pick it up.  They made a case with 6 cameras and sent it from Atlanta to La Guardia in NYC.

(This video is no longer available.)

UPDATE:

Remember this one?

[wp_youtube]8C-e96m4730[/wp_youtube]

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged
7 Comments

The Feeder Feed: Rose Without Thorns Edition

Here is a lovely statue of Mary, portrayed as a Queen, with her scepter of a stem of roses. She was made in about 1350. This statue is related to one in silver given by Jeanne d’Evreux to the Abbey of Saint-Denis in 1339.

20111230-122845.jpg
Her scepter is a stem of roses without a thorn.

20111230-123018.jpg
The Lord has His bird, probably a dove in this case, rather than His finch.

20111230-123149.jpg
But for those of you who want a finch, look closely at this unicorn tapestry.

20111230-123259.jpg
Zoom in on the fountain.

20111230-123346.jpg
It is probably not a coincidence that the finch is here, since the unicorn to be killed in this series is a symbol of Christ.

Posted in Just Too Cool, On the road, The Feeder Feed, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
2 Comments

NYC breakfast

20111230-103126.jpg

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
10 Comments

Impossible lunch

I came today to Veselka in the East Village. It is jammed but I slid into a seat at the counter. I am across from the grill where a very competent fellow is doing well. It brings back memories of my first cooking job.

20111229-131807.jpg
I dream about their borscht. Fir Christmas they added mushroom dumplings.

20111229-131905.jpg
And, ever the optimist, I ordered a sandwich.

20111229-131954.jpg
If this wasn’t enough it came with a potato pancake.

Impossible.

It has been fun trading quips with the guys next to me and tucking into this provender. I’ll have to take half the sandwich with me.

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged , ,
14 Comments